Книги
Schiffer
M.Goodall, A.Tagg
British Aircraft before the Great War
743
M.Goodall, A.Tagg - British Aircraft before the Great War /Schiffer/
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AERIAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY monoplane with subsidiary stabilizers. (Aerial Manufacturing Co. of Great Britain and Ireland, Upper Charles St., Finsbury. Designer W.J. Potter, Elysia, Woodham Ferrers, Essex.)
The machine illustrated was built in 1909 and was flown by Alec Ogilvie at Camber Sands, near Rye in Sussex, at the end of the year for distances up to 250 yards.
The special feature was the undercarriage that folded forward in stages and was designed to provide extra lift at takeoff and to provide a braking effect on landing. This was achieved by mounting two aerofoils on the undercarriage, which presented a change of incidence as the undercarriage was raised or lowered. A fixed aerofoil as wide as the fuselage was also fitted forward of the airscrew together with additional small aerofoils on top of the rudder and below the rear fuselage. Another feature was the fuel tank of aerofoil section.
Power: 50hp believed to be a four-cylinder vee NEC two-stroke as used by Ogilvie in his Short-Wright biplane, driving a four-bladed propeller.
Data
Span 44ft
Length 44ft
In 1910 they were reported to be building a Farman type biplane for Edward Mines.
In January 1910 they were advertising aeroplanes with very imposing names 'The British King', 'The British Queen', 'The Flying Scotsman' and 'The Tradescent'. None of them appear to have been sold and nothing further was heard of them. Potter registered the following patents in 1910: 19198 (monoplane), 20108 (biplane), 21189 and 22475.
The machine illustrated was built in 1909 and was flown by Alec Ogilvie at Camber Sands, near Rye in Sussex, at the end of the year for distances up to 250 yards.
The special feature was the undercarriage that folded forward in stages and was designed to provide extra lift at takeoff and to provide a braking effect on landing. This was achieved by mounting two aerofoils on the undercarriage, which presented a change of incidence as the undercarriage was raised or lowered. A fixed aerofoil as wide as the fuselage was also fitted forward of the airscrew together with additional small aerofoils on top of the rudder and below the rear fuselage. Another feature was the fuel tank of aerofoil section.
Power: 50hp believed to be a four-cylinder vee NEC two-stroke as used by Ogilvie in his Short-Wright biplane, driving a four-bladed propeller.
Data
Span 44ft
Length 44ft
In 1910 they were reported to be building a Farman type biplane for Edward Mines.
In January 1910 they were advertising aeroplanes with very imposing names 'The British King', 'The British Queen', 'The Flying Scotsman' and 'The Tradescent'. None of them appear to have been sold and nothing further was heard of them. Potter registered the following patents in 1910: 19198 (monoplane), 20108 (biplane), 21189 and 22475.
Aerial Manufacturing Company monoplane with folding undercarriage and subsidiary stabilizers covered by Patent No.21 189/1909.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AERIAL WHEEL monoplane. (Aerial Wheel Syndicate Ltd., Ralph Platts and George Sturgess, Mablethorpe, Lincolnshire.)
This most unorthodox monoplane arrived incomplete at Larkhill for the Military Trials in September 1912 but although entered as No. 18 it took no part in the trials. The machine, which was built in Birmingham, was a tractor canard with swept wings and was powered by a 50hp NEC four-cylinder, water-cooled, two-stroke engine. A nacelle between the booms that supported the front elevator housed both engine and crew and was surrounded by a circular frame incorporating a revolving tread which, with skids under the wings, constituted the landing gear. Patent No.26 924/1908 was an early version by the Sturgess brothers.
Pilots were reluctant to test the Aerial Wheel and it is believed that the machine was abandoned unflown. It was still in existence in a hangar at the Midland Flying School at Billesley Common, King's Heath, Birmingham when it was wrecked by a gale in the autumn of 1915.
This most unorthodox monoplane arrived incomplete at Larkhill for the Military Trials in September 1912 but although entered as No. 18 it took no part in the trials. The machine, which was built in Birmingham, was a tractor canard with swept wings and was powered by a 50hp NEC four-cylinder, water-cooled, two-stroke engine. A nacelle between the booms that supported the front elevator housed both engine and crew and was surrounded by a circular frame incorporating a revolving tread which, with skids under the wings, constituted the landing gear. Patent No.26 924/1908 was an early version by the Sturgess brothers.
Pilots were reluctant to test the Aerial Wheel and it is believed that the machine was abandoned unflown. It was still in existence in a hangar at the Midland Flying School at Billesley Common, King's Heath, Birmingham when it was wrecked by a gale in the autumn of 1915.
Aerial Wheel monoplane. The design of this 1912 monoplane concentrated on the rough field performance for the Military Trials, but its flying ability was never tested.
Two rough sketches giving an idea of the arrangement and proportions of the monoplane entered by the Aerial Wheel Syndicate.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AEROPLANE BUILDING and FLYING SOCIETY gliders. (Sec. W. le Maitre, Workshop Kings Rd., Hammersmith. Shed at Kensal Rise Athletic Ground.)
J.D. North, later chief designer at the Grahame-White Company and Boulton and Paul Aircraft designed a biplane glider with front elevator and tail. This was built in 1910-1911 and donated to the society. Because of the lack of gradient at the ground, a launching apparatus consisting of a trolley on two ropes, giving a gradient of 1 in 6 was prepared. This seems to have been used successfully.
Later it was fitted with a 15hp JAP engine lent by one of the members. It had two propellers, one on each side of the tail. There is no evidence that the machine flew in this form.
A monoplane glider, with a span of 30 ft, designed by AN Myers and donated to the Society was in the shed at the ground in October 1910 and awaiting the fitting of an engine.
Data
Biplane glider
Span 27ft
Length 30ft
Chord 5ft
Weight 130 lb
J.D. North, later chief designer at the Grahame-White Company and Boulton and Paul Aircraft designed a biplane glider with front elevator and tail. This was built in 1910-1911 and donated to the society. Because of the lack of gradient at the ground, a launching apparatus consisting of a trolley on two ropes, giving a gradient of 1 in 6 was prepared. This seems to have been used successfully.
Later it was fitted with a 15hp JAP engine lent by one of the members. It had two propellers, one on each side of the tail. There is no evidence that the machine flew in this form.
A monoplane glider, with a span of 30 ft, designed by AN Myers and donated to the Society was in the shed at the ground in October 1910 and awaiting the fitting of an engine.
Data
Biplane glider
Span 27ft
Length 30ft
Chord 5ft
Weight 130 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ALDRITT monoplane (Aldritt's Garage, Portlaiose, Ireland)
This Bleriot type monoplane was built by the Aldritts in 1912, but does not seem to have been very successful. The three-cylinder engine was also designed and built by the Aldritts, but was rather heavy. The main wing spars were made of large diameter bamboo poles, possibly from a local market garden.
The monoplane took off and flew several hundred yards, but the excessive weight caused it to make a very heavy landing. The engine was unfortunately sent to a scrap yard by mistake but this very early monoplane still exists, minus engine, as an exhibit at Filching Manor Motor Museum, near Polegate, Sussex.
Data
Span c.40ft
Length c.30ft
This Bleriot type monoplane was built by the Aldritts in 1912, but does not seem to have been very successful. The three-cylinder engine was also designed and built by the Aldritts, but was rather heavy. The main wing spars were made of large diameter bamboo poles, possibly from a local market garden.
The monoplane took off and flew several hundred yards, but the excessive weight caused it to make a very heavy landing. The engine was unfortunately sent to a scrap yard by mistake but this very early monoplane still exists, minus engine, as an exhibit at Filching Manor Motor Museum, near Polegate, Sussex.
Data
Span c.40ft
Length c.30ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ALLEN Flying Bicycle ornithopter (Richard 'Bobby'Allen, Bradford, Yorkshire)
Designed by a policeman, the 'Bobby' Allen Flying Bicycle was exhibited at Stoney Bridge and Peel Park Gala in June 1908. It was built as a bamboo structure on a bicycle and had a wingspan of 33ft.
The machine had three pairs of narrow chord, beating wings driven by a belt passing over the rims of the cycle wheels. Further pulleys at the top of the structure, with cranks converted the drive into reciprocating motion, which actuated the wings. A tall rectangular fin and rudder were mounted at the front, the latter controlled by the cycle handlebars.
The machine refused to fly or even to move along the ground.
Designed by a policeman, the 'Bobby' Allen Flying Bicycle was exhibited at Stoney Bridge and Peel Park Gala in June 1908. It was built as a bamboo structure on a bicycle and had a wingspan of 33ft.
The machine had three pairs of narrow chord, beating wings driven by a belt passing over the rims of the cycle wheels. Further pulleys at the top of the structure, with cranks converted the drive into reciprocating motion, which actuated the wings. A tall rectangular fin and rudder were mounted at the front, the latter controlled by the cycle handlebars.
The machine refused to fly or even to move along the ground.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ALVAREZ monoplane (C.G. Spencer and Co. of Highbury, tested at the Welsh Harp at Hendon)
This machine was taken aloft by a 23,000 cubic ft balloon. A larger machine was reported to be under construction in December 1906.
Power: 2hp
Data
Span 40ft
Wing area 400 sq ft
Weight 150 lb
This machine was taken aloft by a 23,000 cubic ft balloon. A larger machine was reported to be under construction in December 1906.
Power: 2hp
Data
Span 40ft
Wing area 400 sq ft
Weight 150 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AMOORE monoplane (Frank Amoore, Dover, Kent and 4 City Rd., London EC)
This machine was under construction late in 1913 and early 1914, but appears not to have been completed. It incorporated a lateral pendulum arrangement, to maintain the occupant in a perpendicular attitude, by controlling the seat, which swung below the mainplane. This movement, relative to the airframe, automatically operated the ailerons to correct the attitude of the aircraft. The construction was mainly of light steel tubing. British patent No.29252 of 1912 refers.
The system was similar to that patented in France and Britain by Mons J.A. Moreau No.9445/1911, except that the Moreau Aerostable system operated in the longitudinal sense.
Power: 80hp Dutheil-Chalmers either four- or six-cylinder water-cooled.
Data
Span 36ft
Length 24ft 3in
Weight 1,000lb
This machine was under construction late in 1913 and early 1914, but appears not to have been completed. It incorporated a lateral pendulum arrangement, to maintain the occupant in a perpendicular attitude, by controlling the seat, which swung below the mainplane. This movement, relative to the airframe, automatically operated the ailerons to correct the attitude of the aircraft. The construction was mainly of light steel tubing. British patent No.29252 of 1912 refers.
The system was similar to that patented in France and Britain by Mons J.A. Moreau No.9445/1911, except that the Moreau Aerostable system operated in the longitudinal sense.
Power: 80hp Dutheil-Chalmers either four- or six-cylinder water-cooled.
Data
Span 36ft
Length 24ft 3in
Weight 1,000lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ANDERSON and SINGER glider
This Chanute type biplane glider was built at Aberdeen in 1911 and was flown successfully. Glides up to 30 yards were reported after September 1911.
Data
Span 24ft
Wing area 288 sq ft
This Chanute type biplane glider was built at Aberdeen in 1911 and was flown successfully. Glides up to 30 yards were reported after September 1911.
Data
Span 24ft
Wing area 288 sq ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ARMSTRONG monoplane (Gordon Armstrong, Beverley, near Hull, Yorkshire)
No doubt inspired by Bleriot's Channel flight, the monoplane built by Gordon Armstrong, resembled a Bleriot XI in general layout and its use of the 35hp Anzani fan type radial. The levered type suspension and the tip elevators were similar features but the rest of the aircraft appeared to be of original conception.
The fuselage was a triangular section open girder structure with a single bottom longeron, the three longerons curving to a point at the extreme rear. There was no fin and the rectangular shaped rudder was hinged on a vertical post, braced by a diagonal strut. The tail was supported by a flexible strip, clamped to the bottom longeron.
The monoplane was housed at the East Riding Garage and tested at Beverley Westwood on 26 August 1910 and 2 September 1910, damage occurring on both occasions. The machine complete with engine was offered for sale in February 1912.
From small beginnings at Beverley, Armstrong shock absorbers were developed for cars, together with other engineering products, forming the basis of a large engineering company with several factories in Britain and overseas.
No doubt inspired by Bleriot's Channel flight, the monoplane built by Gordon Armstrong, resembled a Bleriot XI in general layout and its use of the 35hp Anzani fan type radial. The levered type suspension and the tip elevators were similar features but the rest of the aircraft appeared to be of original conception.
The fuselage was a triangular section open girder structure with a single bottom longeron, the three longerons curving to a point at the extreme rear. There was no fin and the rectangular shaped rudder was hinged on a vertical post, braced by a diagonal strut. The tail was supported by a flexible strip, clamped to the bottom longeron.
The monoplane was housed at the East Riding Garage and tested at Beverley Westwood on 26 August 1910 and 2 September 1910, damage occurring on both occasions. The machine complete with engine was offered for sale in February 1912.
From small beginnings at Beverley, Armstrong shock absorbers were developed for cars, together with other engineering products, forming the basis of a large engineering company with several factories in Britain and overseas.
The Armstrong monoplane as modified after crashing on its first flight. The tailwheel has been replaced by a Bleriot-type bamboo tail-skid.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK.1 (Sir W.G. Armstrong Whitworth Co., Gosforth, Newcastle on Tyne)
This two-seater tractor scout biplane, designed by Dutchman Frederick Koolhoven, was the first type built by the Aircraft Dept of this large company. It was a typical biplane design of the period and flew for the first time in September 1914.
The fuselage was a wooden girder which tapered to a horizontal knife-edge. The single bay wings were not staggered and the top wings were connected at the aircraft centerline, where two inverted vee struts supported them. Parallel chord ailerons were replaced with tapered surfaces with a large rear overhang. No tailplane was originally provided but one was added during the early trials.
The machine was under-powered, having been planned for an 80hp engine, which was not available at the time. The performance was not as good as contemporary types and no production resulted.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Speed range 30-75 mph
This two-seater tractor scout biplane, designed by Dutchman Frederick Koolhoven, was the first type built by the Aircraft Dept of this large company. It was a typical biplane design of the period and flew for the first time in September 1914.
The fuselage was a wooden girder which tapered to a horizontal knife-edge. The single bay wings were not staggered and the top wings were connected at the aircraft centerline, where two inverted vee struts supported them. Parallel chord ailerons were replaced with tapered surfaces with a large rear overhang. No tailplane was originally provided but one was added during the early trials.
The machine was under-powered, having been planned for an 80hp engine, which was not available at the time. The performance was not as good as contemporary types and no production resulted.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Speed range 30-75 mph
Armstrong Whitworth FK1. Koolhoven's first design for this large armament company.
The completed F.K.l, also known as the Sissit, was originally designed as a monoplane. It was first flown by Koolhoven himself, probably in 1914.
The completed F.K.l, also known as the Sissit, was originally designed as a monoplane. It was first flown by Koolhoven himself, probably in 1914.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ASL. The Aeronautical Syndicate Ltd. (Horatio C. Barber, Hendon Aerodrome, Sheds 5, 6 and 7. Testing at Larkhill discontinued in September 1910. Head Office at 30 Moorgate St., London EC.l)
ASL monoplane No.2
This second machine for Horatio Barber was built by Howard Wright at Battersea in January and February 1910 and was tested at Larkhill, when it flew in the hands of B. Woodrow on the 6 March. (For first machine see Barber Monoplane)
The ASL No.2 was a pusher monoplane of wooden construction with divided four wheel undercarriage and double nose wheels, together with wheels at the wing tips. The tapered wings had considerable camber and control by warping was aided by hinging the rear spar at the fuselage joint.
The monoplane flew for short distances on several occasions and sustained damage but flew successfully again after repair. The ASL No.2 was succeeded by the Valkyrie also of pusher type.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled with 8ft 2in diameter propeller.
Data
Mainplane Span 42ft
Foreplane Span 12ft
Chord 1 Oft tapering to 6ft
Foreplane Chord 3ft
Area 310sqft
Foreplane Area 36sq ft inc. elevators
Length 31ft
Cruising speed 35mph
Weight 8021b
ASL monoplane No.2
This second machine for Horatio Barber was built by Howard Wright at Battersea in January and February 1910 and was tested at Larkhill, when it flew in the hands of B. Woodrow on the 6 March. (For first machine see Barber Monoplane)
The ASL No.2 was a pusher monoplane of wooden construction with divided four wheel undercarriage and double nose wheels, together with wheels at the wing tips. The tapered wings had considerable camber and control by warping was aided by hinging the rear spar at the fuselage joint.
The monoplane flew for short distances on several occasions and sustained damage but flew successfully again after repair. The ASL No.2 was succeeded by the Valkyrie also of pusher type.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled with 8ft 2in diameter propeller.
Data
Mainplane Span 42ft
Foreplane Span 12ft
Chord 1 Oft tapering to 6ft
Foreplane Chord 3ft
Area 310sqft
Foreplane Area 36sq ft inc. elevators
Length 31ft
Cruising speed 35mph
Weight 8021b
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ASL VALKYRIE monoplanes, Types A, B and C
The first Valkyrie Type A was flown during September 1910 at Larkhill on Salisbury Plain, but was moved soon after to Hendon, where new works had been established in three sheds. It is uncertain whether No. 1 was built at Larkhill or by Howard Wright, but all later machines were certainly made there. Flight of 24 September 1910 (p.774) illustrated No.1 in the air and stated that it was the fifth of a series of experimental models tested on Salisbury Plain over a period of seventeen months. This suggestion of two additional types to those identified may refer to major variations of the Barber and ASL2 monoplanes.
Production of Valkyrie aircraft continued until it was announced in April 1912 that the company was to be closed down, by which time it was reported that nearly 30 machines had been built. Valkyrie No. 11 was the highest number referred to in reports of the time. Most machines were used by ASL for pilot training, some experimental mail flights and the carriage of light freight. On 25 May 1911 pupil Benson was killed in the crash of Type A No.7.
Barber had been discouraged when refused permission to demonstrate any of his five available aircraft, when the Parliamentary Defense Committee visited Hendon on 12 May 1911. Despite this, he presented four machines to the Government in July, three of which had Green engines and one with a Gnome. Two of these were supplied to the Army and two to the Navy at Eastchurch, later moved to Shomcliffe, but it seems that they were never flown.
Various versions of these pusher canard monoplanes were built and flown at Hendon, the original being a single-seater, but other types able to carry one or two passengers, including some referred to as "military" types followed. All were of similar basic type and construction with wooden open fuselages with fabric covered wings and flying surfaces, all extensively wire braced.
The pilot was seated in an exposed position on the level of the top longerons, just in front of the engine; on the three-seater the passengers were positioned on either side of the engine. The radiator on the Green-engined machines was positioned horizontally below the wing center section. A gravity fuel tank above the engine was supplied from a tank by a plunger pump added to the magneto drive of the Green. On the Gnome engined Type B the combined fuel and oil tank was horseshoe shaped and carried on the front of the engine mounting.
No.1 flew originally with rudders close to the structure and no "blinker" fins at the front. Extensions to mount the rudders further aft and the "blinkers" were added to improve control and became standard for all subsequent machines.
Valkyrie Type A monoplane
This was a single-seater for solo practice flying. First flight was on 13 September 1910.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline driving a 7ft 3in diameter propeller.
Data
Mainplane span 34ft Single surfaced
(The Aero 31ft 6in)
Foreplane span 14ft Single surfaced
Mainplane chord 6ft
Foreplane chord 3ft
Mainplane area 190 sq ft
Foreplane area 42 sq ft
Elevators area 20 sq ft
Length 22ft increased to 28ft
Width between skids 8ft
Weight 520 lb
Valkyrie Type B monoplane
A single-seater for racing or cross-country work. A passenger could be accommodated behind the pilot. First flight was on 12 November 1910.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft diameter propeller.
Data
Mainplane span 31ft Single surfaced
Foreplane span 12ft Single surfaced
Mainplane chord 6ft
Foreplane chord 3 ft
Mainplane area 168 sq ft
Foreplane area 42 sq ft
Elevators area 20 sq ft
Length 26ft
Width between skids 8ft 4in
Weight 550 lb
Max speed 70mph
Price ?920
Valkyrie Type C monoplane
Three-seater with passengers seated either side of the engine. First flight was on 13 September 1913.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Mainplane span 39ft double-surfaced
Foreplane span 14ft
Length 29 ft 9in
Mainplane chord 7ft 6in
Foreplane chord 3ft
Mainplane area 302 sq ft
Foreplane area 42 sq ft
Width between skids 9 ft
Weight 800 lb
Max speed 70mph
Price ?1000
The first Valkyrie Type A was flown during September 1910 at Larkhill on Salisbury Plain, but was moved soon after to Hendon, where new works had been established in three sheds. It is uncertain whether No. 1 was built at Larkhill or by Howard Wright, but all later machines were certainly made there. Flight of 24 September 1910 (p.774) illustrated No.1 in the air and stated that it was the fifth of a series of experimental models tested on Salisbury Plain over a period of seventeen months. This suggestion of two additional types to those identified may refer to major variations of the Barber and ASL2 monoplanes.
Production of Valkyrie aircraft continued until it was announced in April 1912 that the company was to be closed down, by which time it was reported that nearly 30 machines had been built. Valkyrie No. 11 was the highest number referred to in reports of the time. Most machines were used by ASL for pilot training, some experimental mail flights and the carriage of light freight. On 25 May 1911 pupil Benson was killed in the crash of Type A No.7.
Barber had been discouraged when refused permission to demonstrate any of his five available aircraft, when the Parliamentary Defense Committee visited Hendon on 12 May 1911. Despite this, he presented four machines to the Government in July, three of which had Green engines and one with a Gnome. Two of these were supplied to the Army and two to the Navy at Eastchurch, later moved to Shomcliffe, but it seems that they were never flown.
Various versions of these pusher canard monoplanes were built and flown at Hendon, the original being a single-seater, but other types able to carry one or two passengers, including some referred to as "military" types followed. All were of similar basic type and construction with wooden open fuselages with fabric covered wings and flying surfaces, all extensively wire braced.
The pilot was seated in an exposed position on the level of the top longerons, just in front of the engine; on the three-seater the passengers were positioned on either side of the engine. The radiator on the Green-engined machines was positioned horizontally below the wing center section. A gravity fuel tank above the engine was supplied from a tank by a plunger pump added to the magneto drive of the Green. On the Gnome engined Type B the combined fuel and oil tank was horseshoe shaped and carried on the front of the engine mounting.
No.1 flew originally with rudders close to the structure and no "blinker" fins at the front. Extensions to mount the rudders further aft and the "blinkers" were added to improve control and became standard for all subsequent machines.
Valkyrie Type A monoplane
This was a single-seater for solo practice flying. First flight was on 13 September 1910.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline driving a 7ft 3in diameter propeller.
Data
Mainplane span 34ft Single surfaced
(The Aero 31ft 6in)
Foreplane span 14ft Single surfaced
Mainplane chord 6ft
Foreplane chord 3ft
Mainplane area 190 sq ft
Foreplane area 42 sq ft
Elevators area 20 sq ft
Length 22ft increased to 28ft
Width between skids 8ft
Weight 520 lb
Valkyrie Type B monoplane
A single-seater for racing or cross-country work. A passenger could be accommodated behind the pilot. First flight was on 12 November 1910.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft diameter propeller.
Data
Mainplane span 31ft Single surfaced
Foreplane span 12ft Single surfaced
Mainplane chord 6ft
Foreplane chord 3 ft
Mainplane area 168 sq ft
Foreplane area 42 sq ft
Elevators area 20 sq ft
Length 26ft
Width between skids 8ft 4in
Weight 550 lb
Max speed 70mph
Price ?920
Valkyrie Type C monoplane
Three-seater with passengers seated either side of the engine. First flight was on 13 September 1913.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Mainplane span 39ft double-surfaced
Foreplane span 14ft
Length 29 ft 9in
Mainplane chord 7ft 6in
Foreplane chord 3ft
Mainplane area 302 sq ft
Foreplane area 42 sq ft
Width between skids 9 ft
Weight 800 lb
Max speed 70mph
Price ?1000
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ASL VIKING 1 biplane
This was the last design by Horatio Barber and was constructed at Hendon towards the end of 1911. It flew in January 1912 shortly before the closure of the company in April. The pilot and passenger were seated side-by-side behind the rotary engine, which drove the two tractor propellers through chains. Fuel was supplied from two external tanks alongside the cockpit and one in the rear fuselage. The rubber-sprung main undercarriage was supplemented by sprung nose, tail and wing tip skids. The ailerons were mounted on three rear interplane struts. The rudder was above, and the fin below the fuselage.
The first flight was at Hendon on 18 January 1912. The Viking was sold to the Chanter Aviation School at Shoreham, where it was converted into a seaplane. At the same time the twin propeller system was discarded and replaced by a single conventional tractor propeller.
Power: 50hp Gnome driving two 8ft 6in diameter propellers through chains.
Data
Mainplane span 31 ft
Tailplane span 9 ft
Elevator span 9 ft
Mainplane chord 4 ft 6 in
Tailplane chord 2 ft 9 in
Elevator chord 2 ft
Mainplane area 310 sq ft
Foreplane area 24 sq ft
Elevator area 18 sq ft
Length 29 ft 6 in
Cruising speed 55 mph
Endurance 6 hrs
Weight 800 ib
This was the last design by Horatio Barber and was constructed at Hendon towards the end of 1911. It flew in January 1912 shortly before the closure of the company in April. The pilot and passenger were seated side-by-side behind the rotary engine, which drove the two tractor propellers through chains. Fuel was supplied from two external tanks alongside the cockpit and one in the rear fuselage. The rubber-sprung main undercarriage was supplemented by sprung nose, tail and wing tip skids. The ailerons were mounted on three rear interplane struts. The rudder was above, and the fin below the fuselage.
The first flight was at Hendon on 18 January 1912. The Viking was sold to the Chanter Aviation School at Shoreham, where it was converted into a seaplane. At the same time the twin propeller system was discarded and replaced by a single conventional tractor propeller.
Power: 50hp Gnome driving two 8ft 6in diameter propellers through chains.
Data
Mainplane span 31 ft
Tailplane span 9 ft
Elevator span 9 ft
Mainplane chord 4 ft 6 in
Tailplane chord 2 ft 9 in
Elevator chord 2 ft
Mainplane area 310 sq ft
Foreplane area 24 sq ft
Elevator area 18 sq ft
Length 29 ft 6 in
Cruising speed 55 mph
Endurance 6 hrs
Weight 800 ib
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ASTLEY monoplanes Nos.1 and 2 (H.J.D. Astley, Chequers Court, Ellesborough, near, Tring, Buckinghamshire)
Astley's first machine was at Brooklands in December 1909, where it was photographed with a damaged undercarriage, an occurrence which took place during trials.
The aircraft had an enclosed rectangular section fuselage mounted on a rather weak-looking Bleriot-style undercarriage. The wing spars passed through the fuselage just below the top longerons, the pilot being seated behind the rear spar. The wing was braced by a tall cabane and to the undercarriage and carried small triangular ailerons, hinged at the trailing edge. The fixed fin and tail surfaces were triangular and extended well forward along the fuselage. The elevator was rectangular and in one piece, with small triangular rudders above and below. Separate wheels were provided for control of the moving surfaces, that for the elevator being mounted outside the fuselage on the top longeron.
Astley built a second monoplane in 1910, using the remains of the first, including the engine, in its construction. The undercarriage and front portion of the fuselage were much as before, but the pilot's seat was repositioned on a structure below the bottom longerons. The full length top longerons of No. 1 were shortened and joined to the bottom longerons, midway along the fuselage, where a small tail wheel was fitted on a vertical post. The lower longerons were presumably increased in strength to deal with the loads from the tail, which was of triangular cruciform shape. No fabric was applied to the fuselage. The ailerons were inset into the trailing edges of the wings, which otherwise resembled those of No.1.
No.2 was probably only capable of taxiing and Astley soon discarded these machines and learnt to fly on a Sommer biplane of the Universal Aviation Co. operating from Shed No. 17 at Brooklands, obtaining RAeC certificate No.48 on 24 January 1911. He subsequently carried out many exhibition flights and flew competitively in the UAC Birdling and Bleriot aircraft, including a cross-Channel flight to France and into Germany. He was regarded as a pilot of considerable ability, but was killed in a Bleriot, while performing aerobatics at low level at Belfast on 21 September 1912.
Power: 30-40hp NEC four-cylinder two-stroke inline watercooled
Data
Span 24ft
Length 24ft
Astley's first machine was at Brooklands in December 1909, where it was photographed with a damaged undercarriage, an occurrence which took place during trials.
The aircraft had an enclosed rectangular section fuselage mounted on a rather weak-looking Bleriot-style undercarriage. The wing spars passed through the fuselage just below the top longerons, the pilot being seated behind the rear spar. The wing was braced by a tall cabane and to the undercarriage and carried small triangular ailerons, hinged at the trailing edge. The fixed fin and tail surfaces were triangular and extended well forward along the fuselage. The elevator was rectangular and in one piece, with small triangular rudders above and below. Separate wheels were provided for control of the moving surfaces, that for the elevator being mounted outside the fuselage on the top longeron.
Astley built a second monoplane in 1910, using the remains of the first, including the engine, in its construction. The undercarriage and front portion of the fuselage were much as before, but the pilot's seat was repositioned on a structure below the bottom longerons. The full length top longerons of No. 1 were shortened and joined to the bottom longerons, midway along the fuselage, where a small tail wheel was fitted on a vertical post. The lower longerons were presumably increased in strength to deal with the loads from the tail, which was of triangular cruciform shape. No fabric was applied to the fuselage. The ailerons were inset into the trailing edges of the wings, which otherwise resembled those of No.1.
No.2 was probably only capable of taxiing and Astley soon discarded these machines and learnt to fly on a Sommer biplane of the Universal Aviation Co. operating from Shed No. 17 at Brooklands, obtaining RAeC certificate No.48 on 24 January 1911. He subsequently carried out many exhibition flights and flew competitively in the UAC Birdling and Bleriot aircraft, including a cross-Channel flight to France and into Germany. He was regarded as a pilot of considerable ability, but was killed in a Bleriot, while performing aerobatics at low level at Belfast on 21 September 1912.
Power: 30-40hp NEC four-cylinder two-stroke inline watercooled
Data
Span 24ft
Length 24ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO (ROE) aircraft (Alliott Verdon Roe, later A.V. Roe and Co.)
The early machines built by A. V. Roe were initially identified as Roe types, later the name AVRO was adopted. Manufacture of his first machine was carried out at the home of his brother, Dr. H.V. Roe at 47 West Hill, Putney in 1907, with trials at Brooklands from December until 17 July 1908. The Roe 1 triplanes were also partly made at Putney, but erection and flight trials took place at the Lea Valley, Walthamstow, or at Blackpool.
A.V. Roe and Co. was formed in January 1910 and, from that date, manufacture was carried out at Brownsfield Mills, Great Ancoats St. Manchester with flying at Brooklands. The company became a limited company in January 1913, and moved the factory to Clifton St. Miles Platting, Manchester, in April 1913. The training operations, carried out at Brooklands, had been moved to Shoreham in the previous October, and although some use was made of Brooklands, this ceased by the end of the year. Flying continued from Shoreham and elsewhere until Hamble aerodrome became available much later in wartime.
AVRO aircraft have been extensively researched and are comprehensively dealt with in many publications, to which reference should be made for more complete descriptions and data. The company became a major part of the British aircraft industry and elements of it continue in being to the present day.
ROE I biplane (Avroplane)
The machine was a pusher type canard biplane, mounted on an undercarriage consisting of two pairs of main wheels, spaced well apart, and with small wheels at the wing tips. There was covering on the lower surfaces of the wings and flying controls only, leaving the ribs exposed above.
There was insufficient power to fly with the JAP engine originally used, but towing by car along the Finishing Straight at Brooklands achieved short glides. A later claim to have flown on 8 June 1908 with the Antoinette engine was not accepted officially, through lack of evidence, although hops of a few feet in height were probably accomplished. The Roe I was dismantled in July 1908.
A modern replica of the biplane, and its shed, now exists at the Brooklands Museum.
Power: 6hp JAP vee twin air-cooled driving a four-bladed metal propeller. Replaced by a 24hp Antoinette eight-cylinder vee water-cooled driving a two-bladed metal propeller
Data
Span top 36ft
Additional wing surfaces added to the center section on the fitting of the Antoinette, converting the machine into a semi-triplane.
Length 23 ft
Weight 650 lb loaded
The early machines built by A. V. Roe were initially identified as Roe types, later the name AVRO was adopted. Manufacture of his first machine was carried out at the home of his brother, Dr. H.V. Roe at 47 West Hill, Putney in 1907, with trials at Brooklands from December until 17 July 1908. The Roe 1 triplanes were also partly made at Putney, but erection and flight trials took place at the Lea Valley, Walthamstow, or at Blackpool.
A.V. Roe and Co. was formed in January 1910 and, from that date, manufacture was carried out at Brownsfield Mills, Great Ancoats St. Manchester with flying at Brooklands. The company became a limited company in January 1913, and moved the factory to Clifton St. Miles Platting, Manchester, in April 1913. The training operations, carried out at Brooklands, had been moved to Shoreham in the previous October, and although some use was made of Brooklands, this ceased by the end of the year. Flying continued from Shoreham and elsewhere until Hamble aerodrome became available much later in wartime.
AVRO aircraft have been extensively researched and are comprehensively dealt with in many publications, to which reference should be made for more complete descriptions and data. The company became a major part of the British aircraft industry and elements of it continue in being to the present day.
ROE I biplane (Avroplane)
The machine was a pusher type canard biplane, mounted on an undercarriage consisting of two pairs of main wheels, spaced well apart, and with small wheels at the wing tips. There was covering on the lower surfaces of the wings and flying controls only, leaving the ribs exposed above.
There was insufficient power to fly with the JAP engine originally used, but towing by car along the Finishing Straight at Brooklands achieved short glides. A later claim to have flown on 8 June 1908 with the Antoinette engine was not accepted officially, through lack of evidence, although hops of a few feet in height were probably accomplished. The Roe I was dismantled in July 1908.
A modern replica of the biplane, and its shed, now exists at the Brooklands Museum.
Power: 6hp JAP vee twin air-cooled driving a four-bladed metal propeller. Replaced by a 24hp Antoinette eight-cylinder vee water-cooled driving a two-bladed metal propeller
Data
Span top 36ft
Additional wing surfaces added to the center section on the fitting of the Antoinette, converting the machine into a semi-triplane.
Length 23 ft
Weight 650 lb loaded
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ROE I Triplane (Bulls-Eye Avroplane)
Two of these triplanes were built; No.1 was made at Putney and erected and tested at Lea Valley, Walthamstow. Flight trials of No.2 were carried out at Wembley Park and Brooklands.
A.V. Roe had two triplanes of different types, under construction in the railway arch workshops in the Lea Valley in 1909. The larger one, for car dealer Friswell, was not completed and was auctioned incomplete. The smaller machine was assembled and flown on 23 July 1909, becoming the first all-British machine to fly. It was then taken to Blackpool with second machine of similar type, which was not able to fly at the Meeting. The first triplane was discarded after the Blackpool Meeting and has been on display at the Science Museum since 1925.
The second triplane, with a tail skid instead of a wheel, was taken to the Old Deer Park, Richmond, but since facilities were unsuitable, was moved in November 1909 to Wembley Park, where it flew on 6 December 1909. Brooklands aerodrome was properly established in 1910, and Roe moved the triplane there, housing it in Shed No. 14. It flew in various forms until dismantled in May 1910.
Variations were made in the course of development which included a tapered fuselage to the second aircraft, repositioned fuel tank and a later type undercarriage on this machine known as the 'Two-and-a-Bit Plane'.
On both machines the tailplanes were fixed lifting surfaces and pitch control was by varying the incidence of the mainplanes, which could also be warped to provide roll control. Additional fin area between the outboard struts of the triplane tail was originally fitted to No.1. This system was inadequate for fully controlled flight.
Power: 6hp JAP vee twin air-cooled with four-bladed metal propeller; also a 9-10hp JAP vee twin was fitted to the first machine at a later stage. A 14-20hp JAP vee four-cylinder air-cooled with four-bladed metal propeller was fitted to the second machine.
Data
Mainplane span 20 ft
Mainplane chord 3ft 6in
Mainplane area 210 sq ft
Tailplane span 10ft
Tailplane chord 3ft 6in
Tailplane area 105 sq ft
Length 20 ft
Weight loaded 450 lb
Two upper planes later extended and lower planes reduced on the second machine only, then nicknamed 'Two-and-a-Bit Plane'.
ROE II triplanes (No.1 Mercury)
Two of these machines were built at Brownsfield Mills and flown at Brooklands. They were built of better materials and had improved design features. Most of the fuselage was covered with light wooden sheeting, the rest with fabric. The wings and tail unit were now inter connected, to enable the incidence of both to be controlled.
A triangulated undercarriage, as fitted to the 'Two-and-a-Bit Plane', was used and although wing warping was used initially, this was superseded by ailerons fitted to the center wing from 27 April 1910, and a rudder the full height of the tail unit. A water-cooled Green engine with small vertical radiator behind, provided the power. A second cockpit in front of the pilot could accommodate a passenger.
No. 1 was exhibited at the Manchester Aero Club Exhibition at White City, Manchester, on 4 March 1910, when it was named Mercury; then it appeared at the Olympia Aero Show in London between 11-19 March 1910. The first flight trials followed at Brooklands, with several minor incidents, before the machine was prepared for dispatch by rail to Blackpool for the flying meeting. Roe II No.1, with the successor Roe III, were accidentally burnt on the train on 27 July 1910. No.2 was built for W.G. Windham, being ordered by him at Olympia. It flew for the first time on 26 May 1910. And remained at Brooklands, being used intermittently by the owner.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 8ft diameter wooden propeller.
Data
Mainplane span 26 ft
Mainplane chord 3 ft 6in
Mainplane area 280 sq ft
Tailplane span 8ft 4in
Tailplane chord 3ft
Tailplane area. 75 sq ft
Length 23 ft
Weight allup 550 lb
Two of these triplanes were built; No.1 was made at Putney and erected and tested at Lea Valley, Walthamstow. Flight trials of No.2 were carried out at Wembley Park and Brooklands.
A.V. Roe had two triplanes of different types, under construction in the railway arch workshops in the Lea Valley in 1909. The larger one, for car dealer Friswell, was not completed and was auctioned incomplete. The smaller machine was assembled and flown on 23 July 1909, becoming the first all-British machine to fly. It was then taken to Blackpool with second machine of similar type, which was not able to fly at the Meeting. The first triplane was discarded after the Blackpool Meeting and has been on display at the Science Museum since 1925.
The second triplane, with a tail skid instead of a wheel, was taken to the Old Deer Park, Richmond, but since facilities were unsuitable, was moved in November 1909 to Wembley Park, where it flew on 6 December 1909. Brooklands aerodrome was properly established in 1910, and Roe moved the triplane there, housing it in Shed No. 14. It flew in various forms until dismantled in May 1910.
Variations were made in the course of development which included a tapered fuselage to the second aircraft, repositioned fuel tank and a later type undercarriage on this machine known as the 'Two-and-a-Bit Plane'.
On both machines the tailplanes were fixed lifting surfaces and pitch control was by varying the incidence of the mainplanes, which could also be warped to provide roll control. Additional fin area between the outboard struts of the triplane tail was originally fitted to No.1. This system was inadequate for fully controlled flight.
Power: 6hp JAP vee twin air-cooled with four-bladed metal propeller; also a 9-10hp JAP vee twin was fitted to the first machine at a later stage. A 14-20hp JAP vee four-cylinder air-cooled with four-bladed metal propeller was fitted to the second machine.
Data
Mainplane span 20 ft
Mainplane chord 3ft 6in
Mainplane area 210 sq ft
Tailplane span 10ft
Tailplane chord 3ft 6in
Tailplane area 105 sq ft
Length 20 ft
Weight loaded 450 lb
Two upper planes later extended and lower planes reduced on the second machine only, then nicknamed 'Two-and-a-Bit Plane'.
ROE II triplanes (No.1 Mercury)
Two of these machines were built at Brownsfield Mills and flown at Brooklands. They were built of better materials and had improved design features. Most of the fuselage was covered with light wooden sheeting, the rest with fabric. The wings and tail unit were now inter connected, to enable the incidence of both to be controlled.
A triangulated undercarriage, as fitted to the 'Two-and-a-Bit Plane', was used and although wing warping was used initially, this was superseded by ailerons fitted to the center wing from 27 April 1910, and a rudder the full height of the tail unit. A water-cooled Green engine with small vertical radiator behind, provided the power. A second cockpit in front of the pilot could accommodate a passenger.
No. 1 was exhibited at the Manchester Aero Club Exhibition at White City, Manchester, on 4 March 1910, when it was named Mercury; then it appeared at the Olympia Aero Show in London between 11-19 March 1910. The first flight trials followed at Brooklands, with several minor incidents, before the machine was prepared for dispatch by rail to Blackpool for the flying meeting. Roe II No.1, with the successor Roe III, were accidentally burnt on the train on 27 July 1910. No.2 was built for W.G. Windham, being ordered by him at Olympia. It flew for the first time on 26 May 1910. And remained at Brooklands, being used intermittently by the owner.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 8ft diameter wooden propeller.
Data
Mainplane span 26 ft
Mainplane chord 3 ft 6in
Mainplane area 280 sq ft
Tailplane span 8ft 4in
Tailplane chord 3ft
Tailplane area. 75 sq ft
Length 23 ft
Weight allup 550 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Farman type biplane
In 1910 a machine was constructed for M.F. Edwards of Bolton with a 20hp two-cylinder two-stroke engine, which although identified as an Avro engine, was designed by M.F. and W. Edwards and made by H.W. Cowley and Co. of Daubhill, Bolton. No details of the machine are available, but it was owned by a Manchester group of enthusiasts, including four Edwards brothers, until advertised for sale at the end of 1912.
In 1910 a machine was constructed for M.F. Edwards of Bolton with a 20hp two-cylinder two-stroke engine, which although identified as an Avro engine, was designed by M.F. and W. Edwards and made by H.W. Cowley and Co. of Daubhill, Bolton. No details of the machine are available, but it was owned by a Manchester group of enthusiasts, including four Edwards brothers, until advertised for sale at the end of 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ROE III triplanes
This was a larger machine capable of carrying a passenger in front of the pilot, facing either forward or aft. A major change from Roe II was to fix the wings at the fuselage and rely on the tail unit for control in pitch. Ailerons were fitted to the top wing on the first machine and on the center wing on the three subsequent machines. The substantial undercarriage was of Farman type with four wheels, although it is believed that on the fourth machine, only two were used. A JAP engine was fitted to the first machine and Green engines to the remainder.
This was the first Avro machine capable of fully controlled flight. 'AV' had flown "straights" on it for the first time on 4 July 1910. By 9 July 1910 he was making turns and figures of eight, being airborne for up to twenty-five minutes. He took his tests for the RAeC certificate on the 20 July 1910 and was issued with No. 18 a week later.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee. 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Top and center span 31ft
Bottom span 20ft
Mainplane chord 3 ft 6in
Mainplane area 287 sq ft
Length 23ft
Tailplane span 8ft 4in
Tailplane chord 3ft
Tailplane area 75 sq ft
Weight allup 750 lb
No.1 35hp JAP first flown at Brooklands 24 June 1910. For sale May 1911.
No.2 35hp Green first flown at Brooklands 9 July 1910. Burnt on train on way to the Blackpool Flying Meeting 27 July 1910.
No.3 35hp Green Replacement built urgently after loss of No.2. Assembled at Blackpool. First flown at Blackpool 1 August 1910. Destroyed at Boston on 8 August 1910
No.4 35hp Green supplied to the Harvard Aeronautical Society less engine. First flown at Boston, Massachusetts in the United States using engine from No.3. Crashed but rebuilt.
This was a larger machine capable of carrying a passenger in front of the pilot, facing either forward or aft. A major change from Roe II was to fix the wings at the fuselage and rely on the tail unit for control in pitch. Ailerons were fitted to the top wing on the first machine and on the center wing on the three subsequent machines. The substantial undercarriage was of Farman type with four wheels, although it is believed that on the fourth machine, only two were used. A JAP engine was fitted to the first machine and Green engines to the remainder.
This was the first Avro machine capable of fully controlled flight. 'AV' had flown "straights" on it for the first time on 4 July 1910. By 9 July 1910 he was making turns and figures of eight, being airborne for up to twenty-five minutes. He took his tests for the RAeC certificate on the 20 July 1910 and was issued with No. 18 a week later.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee. 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Top and center span 31ft
Bottom span 20ft
Mainplane chord 3 ft 6in
Mainplane area 287 sq ft
Length 23ft
Tailplane span 8ft 4in
Tailplane chord 3ft
Tailplane area 75 sq ft
Weight allup 750 lb
No.1 35hp JAP first flown at Brooklands 24 June 1910. For sale May 1911.
No.2 35hp Green first flown at Brooklands 9 July 1910. Burnt on train on way to the Blackpool Flying Meeting 27 July 1910.
No.3 35hp Green Replacement built urgently after loss of No.2. Assembled at Blackpool. First flown at Blackpool 1 August 1910. Destroyed at Boston on 8 August 1910
No.4 35hp Green supplied to the Harvard Aeronautical Society less engine. First flown at Boston, Massachusetts in the United States using engine from No.3. Crashed but rebuilt.
A. V. Roe seated in the 35 h.p. Green engined Roe III triplane at Squantum Point, Boston, U.S.A. in September 1911. This machine was destroyed by fire on the train on the way to the Blackpool Meeting. (Green engine).
Roe III Triplane. Four of these were built, including one exported to the United States. (JAP engine).
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ROE IV triplane
This single-seater, developed from the earlier machines, was the last of A.V. Roe's triplanes. It incorporated a single tailplane with elevators but reverted to warping wings with the bottom wing of narrow chord. The single machine built was retained at Brooklands for the Avro Flying School. It was crashed on several occasions, including a crash on 14 February 1911, when the opportunity was taken, during the subsequent repair, to insert an extra 4ft length in the fuselage. The Roe IV first flew in September 1910 and was operated until August 1911.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Top and center span 32 ft
Top and center chord 3ft 6in
Bottom span 20 ft
Bottom chord 3 ft
Area 284 sq ft
Weight allup 650 lb
Length 30 ft
(Later extended to 34 ft.)
This single-seater, developed from the earlier machines, was the last of A.V. Roe's triplanes. It incorporated a single tailplane with elevators but reverted to warping wings with the bottom wing of narrow chord. The single machine built was retained at Brooklands for the Avro Flying School. It was crashed on several occasions, including a crash on 14 February 1911, when the opportunity was taken, during the subsequent repair, to insert an extra 4ft length in the fuselage. The Roe IV first flew in September 1910 and was operated until August 1911.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Top and center span 32 ft
Top and center chord 3ft 6in
Bottom span 20 ft
Bottom chord 3 ft
Area 284 sq ft
Weight allup 650 lb
Length 30 ft
(Later extended to 34 ft.)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO monoplane
A scheme for a monoplane was advertised in 'The Aviator's Storehouse', the AVRO catalogue, in 1910. The machine was not built. The price less engine was ?200.
Power: 20 or 40hp Avro engine. These were two-stroke engines designed by M.F. and W. Edwards and made by H.W. Cowley of Bolton. The smaller engine was a horizontally opposed two-cylinder air-cooled type, the larger a four-cylinder. 20hp or 35hp JAP or NEC with two or four cylinders were also offered. The JAPs were air-cooled two or four-cylinder vee types. The NECs were water-cooled two-stroke inlines and vee-fours. 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled could also be used.
Data
Span 36ft
Area 220 sq ft
Price 20hp Avro ?325
with engine 20hp JAP or NEC ?375
AVRO biplane
Also advertised in 'The Aviator's Storehouse' and again, never built, was a biplane with the engine alternatives as for the monoplane. The price less engine was ?225
Data
Span 29ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 21ft
Height 7ft 6in
Weight 250 lb less engine
Prices 20hp Avro ?350
with engine 20hp JAP or NEC ?400
35hp JAP or NEC ?500
35hp Green ?550
40hp Avro ?450
AVRO Type D biplanes
The first of these biplanes arrived from Manchester in March and was flown for the first time on 1 April 1911 at Brooklands by Howard Pixton. The fuselage and tail surfaces were similar to those of the Roe IV, but with two bay warping biplane wings, plus a partial center section bay. A further six were built in about a year after the first had flown, and these varied in a number of respects. Several types of engine were used, radiator positions were changed, the tailplane shape became rectangular and two machines were converted to sesquiplanes for competition work. Although the basic Type D was a two-seater, provision of an extra fuel tank and other changes converted the machine to a single-seater The prototype was sold for ?700 to Cdr. Schwann RN, for seaplane experiments and was used with seven types of floats, both single and twin type, flown mainly by S.V Sippe at Barrow-in-Furness.
Power:
35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
45hp Green with drilled cylinder barrels.
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
35hp Viale five-cylinder air-cooled radial.
50hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial.
Data
Span top 31ft
Bottom 31ft
Chord 5ft
Area 310 sq ft
Length 28 ft (No. 1 26 ft)
Height 9 ft 2in
Weight allup 500 lb
Sesquiplane
Span top 33ft
Bottom 23ft (No.2 28ft)
Chord 5ft
Area 279 sq ft (No.2 329 sq ft)
Weight allup 550 lb
Speed 45-50 mph
Seaplane 40 mph
No.1 35 and 45hp Green. First flown at Brooklands 1 April 1911. Converted to a seaplane at Barrow-in-Furness from August 1911. Last reported in use April 1912.
No.2 60hp ENV Intended for Circuit of Britain. First flown Brooklands 18 July 1911, but crashed 22 July 1911. Converted to sesquiplane with large triangular tailplane. Extensions fitted to lower wings were unsuccessful.
No.3 35hp Green with slanting radiator. First flown Brooklands 12 October 1911. Used by the Avro School at Brooklands and Shoreham until May 1914.
No.4 45hp Green with fore and aft radiator. Single-seater. First flown at Brooklands 12 October 1911. Abortive attempt at Michelin Prize but used mainly by the Avro School at Brooklands and Shoreham until May 1914.
No.5 35hp Green. Sesquiplane similar to No.2. First flown Brooklands October-November 1911. Reported for sale at Shed No.4 in May 1912 and scrapped in December at Brooklands.
No.6 50hp Viale. School machine. First flown at Brooklands 20 November 1911 and crashed at Abingdon 29 January 1912. The engine was installed by Mons Ducrocq, agent for Viale, and Jack Alcock, later of Atlantic fame.
No.7 50hp Isaacson. School machine. Completed November-December 1911, used at Brooklands and Shoreham until May 1914.
A scheme for a monoplane was advertised in 'The Aviator's Storehouse', the AVRO catalogue, in 1910. The machine was not built. The price less engine was ?200.
Power: 20 or 40hp Avro engine. These were two-stroke engines designed by M.F. and W. Edwards and made by H.W. Cowley of Bolton. The smaller engine was a horizontally opposed two-cylinder air-cooled type, the larger a four-cylinder. 20hp or 35hp JAP or NEC with two or four cylinders were also offered. The JAPs were air-cooled two or four-cylinder vee types. The NECs were water-cooled two-stroke inlines and vee-fours. 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled could also be used.
Data
Span 36ft
Area 220 sq ft
Price 20hp Avro ?325
with engine 20hp JAP or NEC ?375
AVRO biplane
Also advertised in 'The Aviator's Storehouse' and again, never built, was a biplane with the engine alternatives as for the monoplane. The price less engine was ?225
Data
Span 29ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 21ft
Height 7ft 6in
Weight 250 lb less engine
Prices 20hp Avro ?350
with engine 20hp JAP or NEC ?400
35hp JAP or NEC ?500
35hp Green ?550
40hp Avro ?450
AVRO Type D biplanes
The first of these biplanes arrived from Manchester in March and was flown for the first time on 1 April 1911 at Brooklands by Howard Pixton. The fuselage and tail surfaces were similar to those of the Roe IV, but with two bay warping biplane wings, plus a partial center section bay. A further six were built in about a year after the first had flown, and these varied in a number of respects. Several types of engine were used, radiator positions were changed, the tailplane shape became rectangular and two machines were converted to sesquiplanes for competition work. Although the basic Type D was a two-seater, provision of an extra fuel tank and other changes converted the machine to a single-seater The prototype was sold for ?700 to Cdr. Schwann RN, for seaplane experiments and was used with seven types of floats, both single and twin type, flown mainly by S.V Sippe at Barrow-in-Furness.
Power:
35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
45hp Green with drilled cylinder barrels.
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
35hp Viale five-cylinder air-cooled radial.
50hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial.
Data
Span top 31ft
Bottom 31ft
Chord 5ft
Area 310 sq ft
Length 28 ft (No. 1 26 ft)
Height 9 ft 2in
Weight allup 500 lb
Sesquiplane
Span top 33ft
Bottom 23ft (No.2 28ft)
Chord 5ft
Area 279 sq ft (No.2 329 sq ft)
Weight allup 550 lb
Speed 45-50 mph
Seaplane 40 mph
No.1 35 and 45hp Green. First flown at Brooklands 1 April 1911. Converted to a seaplane at Barrow-in-Furness from August 1911. Last reported in use April 1912.
No.2 60hp ENV Intended for Circuit of Britain. First flown Brooklands 18 July 1911, but crashed 22 July 1911. Converted to sesquiplane with large triangular tailplane. Extensions fitted to lower wings were unsuccessful.
No.3 35hp Green with slanting radiator. First flown Brooklands 12 October 1911. Used by the Avro School at Brooklands and Shoreham until May 1914.
No.4 45hp Green with fore and aft radiator. Single-seater. First flown at Brooklands 12 October 1911. Abortive attempt at Michelin Prize but used mainly by the Avro School at Brooklands and Shoreham until May 1914.
No.5 35hp Green. Sesquiplane similar to No.2. First flown Brooklands October-November 1911. Reported for sale at Shed No.4 in May 1912 and scrapped in December at Brooklands.
No.6 50hp Viale. School machine. First flown at Brooklands 20 November 1911 and crashed at Abingdon 29 January 1912. The engine was installed by Mons Ducrocq, agent for Viale, and Jack Alcock, later of Atlantic fame.
No.7 50hp Isaacson. School machine. Completed November-December 1911, used at Brooklands and Shoreham until May 1914.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO-BURGA monoplane
While the Type E prototype was being built at Manchester, a monoplane to the design of Lt. Burga of the Peruvian Navy was in hand, in which a unique system of lateral control by rudders, above and below the fuselage, was featured. These operated in opposed directions and served instead of ailerons or wing warping. Wings of alternative sections and set at various angles of incidence could be fitted. The narrow fuselage, tail unit and undercarriage owed much to the Avro Type E.
Construction took place throughout 1912 and first flight at Shoreham on 12 November 1912, piloted by H.R. Simms. After severe damage in January 1913 the monoplane was returned to Manchester but was not repaired.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data Length 29ft
While the Type E prototype was being built at Manchester, a monoplane to the design of Lt. Burga of the Peruvian Navy was in hand, in which a unique system of lateral control by rudders, above and below the fuselage, was featured. These operated in opposed directions and served instead of ailerons or wing warping. Wings of alternative sections and set at various angles of incidence could be fitted. The narrow fuselage, tail unit and undercarriage owed much to the Avro Type E.
Construction took place throughout 1912 and first flight at Shoreham on 12 November 1912, piloted by H.R. Simms. After severe damage in January 1913 the monoplane was returned to Manchester but was not repaired.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data Length 29ft
The monoplane built by A.V. Roe for Lt. R. Burga of the Peruvian Navy, at Shoreham in November 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Duigan biplane
This biplane was made to an order from John R. Duigan, an Australian, who had built his own Wright type glider and Farman-type powered aircraft in 1909-1911, with which he achieved a number of successful flights. He came to England to learn more of current practice and to receive flying instruction.
On arrival he ordered a biplane from Avro, which was built at Manchester and delivered to Huntingdon, when completed in December 1911. The machine was not a great success and Duigan took it back to Brooklands. After some limited straight flights in February, Duigan joined the Avro school. At Brooklands the original Alvaston engine was replaced by an ENV, and together with improvements, the machine was eventually capable of flying for one hour at up to 600ft with the pilot only; flights with a passenger were limited to "straights".
Duigan returned to Australia and his Avro was bought by the Lakes Flying Co. for ?180 and was moved to Windermere on 4 June 1912. At Windermere it was largely rebuilt with a new engine and became the Lakes Sea Bird (q.v.).
This Avro biplane had a deep fuselage with radiators positioned either side of the front cockpit; wing warping was employed. The undercarriage had a leaf spring axle with a central skid. The skid became a feature of many later Avro aircraft. In its final form this machine was the basis of the next type, a much-improved machine, which eventually led to the outstanding Type 504.
Power:
40hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled
35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 34ft
Chord 4ft 6in
Length 29ft 6in
Area 300 sq ft
Speed 40mph
AVRO Type. E and Es (later known as Types 500 and 502)
This was a slightly larger version of the biplane built for John Duigan, more powerful and able to fly successfully as a two-seater. It was built to meet an official requirement and was often referred to as the 'Military Biplane'. The first flight took place at Brooklands on 14 March 1912 in the hands of Lt. Wilfred Parke RN. Testing proceeded, following which an entry was made for the Mortimer Singer Prize of ?500, offered to an army or navy officer who flew the longest flight with a passenger, in Britain, before the end of March. Parke left Brooklands with W.H. Sayers on 20 March 1912 for Hendon for his bid, but the aircraft suffered engine failure and crashed badly on takeoff. Sayers in the front cockpit was trapped by the radiators and was extricated with difficulty; the radiators were reduced in height in the course of the rebuilding.
Trials at Farnborough were carried out successfully in June 1912, and subsequently the engine was replaced by the new ABC. Testing recommenced in the hands of Raynham and later R.L. Charteris of the engine company until early in 1913, when the ENV was refitted. The machine was then handed over to the Avro school at Shoreham, where it flew until 29 June 1913, when it was crashed by a pupil and burned. The pupil was the first fatality in an Avro aircraft.
Type E prototype
Power:
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
60hp ABC eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Flight
Mainplane span 36 ft
Mainplane chord 4ft 10in The Aeroplane 4ft 9in
Mainplane gap 5 ft
Mainplane area 338 sq ft The Aeroplane 332 sq ft
Tailplane span 8 ft
Area inc. elevators 32 sq ft The Aeroplane 33 sq ft
Length 31 ft The Aeroplane 30ft 6in
Height 9 ft 9in
Weight 1,2001b (Also quoted as 1,100lb)
Weight allup 1,650lb
Speed 60 mph
Production: Eighteen aircraft of various versions.
Type E 1 Prototype. First flight 14 March 1912 at Brooklands. Destroyed at Shoreham 29 June 1913.
This biplane was made to an order from John R. Duigan, an Australian, who had built his own Wright type glider and Farman-type powered aircraft in 1909-1911, with which he achieved a number of successful flights. He came to England to learn more of current practice and to receive flying instruction.
On arrival he ordered a biplane from Avro, which was built at Manchester and delivered to Huntingdon, when completed in December 1911. The machine was not a great success and Duigan took it back to Brooklands. After some limited straight flights in February, Duigan joined the Avro school. At Brooklands the original Alvaston engine was replaced by an ENV, and together with improvements, the machine was eventually capable of flying for one hour at up to 600ft with the pilot only; flights with a passenger were limited to "straights".
Duigan returned to Australia and his Avro was bought by the Lakes Flying Co. for ?180 and was moved to Windermere on 4 June 1912. At Windermere it was largely rebuilt with a new engine and became the Lakes Sea Bird (q.v.).
This Avro biplane had a deep fuselage with radiators positioned either side of the front cockpit; wing warping was employed. The undercarriage had a leaf spring axle with a central skid. The skid became a feature of many later Avro aircraft. In its final form this machine was the basis of the next type, a much-improved machine, which eventually led to the outstanding Type 504.
Power:
40hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled
35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 34ft
Chord 4ft 6in
Length 29ft 6in
Area 300 sq ft
Speed 40mph
AVRO Type. E and Es (later known as Types 500 and 502)
This was a slightly larger version of the biplane built for John Duigan, more powerful and able to fly successfully as a two-seater. It was built to meet an official requirement and was often referred to as the 'Military Biplane'. The first flight took place at Brooklands on 14 March 1912 in the hands of Lt. Wilfred Parke RN. Testing proceeded, following which an entry was made for the Mortimer Singer Prize of ?500, offered to an army or navy officer who flew the longest flight with a passenger, in Britain, before the end of March. Parke left Brooklands with W.H. Sayers on 20 March 1912 for Hendon for his bid, but the aircraft suffered engine failure and crashed badly on takeoff. Sayers in the front cockpit was trapped by the radiators and was extricated with difficulty; the radiators were reduced in height in the course of the rebuilding.
Trials at Farnborough were carried out successfully in June 1912, and subsequently the engine was replaced by the new ABC. Testing recommenced in the hands of Raynham and later R.L. Charteris of the engine company until early in 1913, when the ENV was refitted. The machine was then handed over to the Avro school at Shoreham, where it flew until 29 June 1913, when it was crashed by a pupil and burned. The pupil was the first fatality in an Avro aircraft.
Type E prototype
Power:
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
60hp ABC eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Flight
Mainplane span 36 ft
Mainplane chord 4ft 10in The Aeroplane 4ft 9in
Mainplane gap 5 ft
Mainplane area 338 sq ft The Aeroplane 332 sq ft
Tailplane span 8 ft
Area inc. elevators 32 sq ft The Aeroplane 33 sq ft
Length 31 ft The Aeroplane 30ft 6in
Height 9 ft 9in
Weight 1,2001b (Also quoted as 1,100lb)
Weight allup 1,650lb
Speed 60 mph
Production: Eighteen aircraft of various versions.
Type E 1 Prototype. First flight 14 March 1912 at Brooklands. Destroyed at Shoreham 29 June 1913.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type. E and Es (later known as Types 500 and 502)
<...>
A second machine of the type, but with a 50hp Gnome, was built and was flown by Parke at Brooklands on 8 May 1912. This proved to have a better performance and resulted in a early War Office order for three machines. The third of these was given its first flight from Eccles cricket ground near the Manchester factory. It was now also known as the Type 500. Further orders followed from the War Office, Admiralty, the Portuguese Government and civilian sources. It was during the time that these machines were in production that the company moved its Manchester premises in April 1913.
A number of changes were made to the aircraft during its operational life, including fitting ailerons to both top and bottom wings. The sprung rudder was replaced by a separate tail skid also various types of wing tip skids, some with wheels, were fitted. Later the rudder shape was changed to the more familiar comma shape of future Avro aircraft.
The War Office ordered a batch of five of the single-seater version, which were basically the same as the two-seaters and subject to the same modifications. These were identified as Type Es or Type 502.
Flight of 30 March 1912 and The Aeroplane of 11 April 1912 earned drawings and data for the prototype, with dimensions slightly at variance in some respects and neither agreed on the position of the radiators. The risk to the passenger was commented on by The Aeroplane. Flight showed auxiliary radiators just below the top wing, probably fitted later and the cause of Sayers' entrapment.
Type E (Avro Type 500)
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 9ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 36ft
Weight 900lb
Weight allup 1,300lb
Length 29ft
Area 335 sq ft
Max speed 62 mph
Production: Eighteen aircraft of various versions.
Type E 1 Prototype. First flight 14 March 1912 at Brooklands. Destroyed at Shoreham 29 June 1913.
Type E (Avro 500) seven machines delivered between May 1912 - April 1913 to the War Office. Serial Nos.404-406, 430, 432-433, 448 used at CFS Upavon.
Two machines delivered May 1913 and February 1914 to Admiralty contract, serial Nos.41 and 150 used at Hendon and Eastchurch.
One machine to Portuguese Government delivered Lisbon October 1912 named Republica.
One machine first flight July 1913 to private owner at Hendon later with RNAS serial No.939.
One machine to Hall School at Hendon January 1914, later with the RFC serial No.491.
Type Es (Avro 502) 5 machines delivered between April-June 1913. to War Office contract. Serial Nos.285, 288-291.
<...>
A second machine of the type, but with a 50hp Gnome, was built and was flown by Parke at Brooklands on 8 May 1912. This proved to have a better performance and resulted in a early War Office order for three machines. The third of these was given its first flight from Eccles cricket ground near the Manchester factory. It was now also known as the Type 500. Further orders followed from the War Office, Admiralty, the Portuguese Government and civilian sources. It was during the time that these machines were in production that the company moved its Manchester premises in April 1913.
A number of changes were made to the aircraft during its operational life, including fitting ailerons to both top and bottom wings. The sprung rudder was replaced by a separate tail skid also various types of wing tip skids, some with wheels, were fitted. Later the rudder shape was changed to the more familiar comma shape of future Avro aircraft.
The War Office ordered a batch of five of the single-seater version, which were basically the same as the two-seaters and subject to the same modifications. These were identified as Type Es or Type 502.
Flight of 30 March 1912 and The Aeroplane of 11 April 1912 earned drawings and data for the prototype, with dimensions slightly at variance in some respects and neither agreed on the position of the radiators. The risk to the passenger was commented on by The Aeroplane. Flight showed auxiliary radiators just below the top wing, probably fitted later and the cause of Sayers' entrapment.
Type E (Avro Type 500)
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 9ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 36ft
Weight 900lb
Weight allup 1,300lb
Length 29ft
Area 335 sq ft
Max speed 62 mph
Production: Eighteen aircraft of various versions.
Type E 1 Prototype. First flight 14 March 1912 at Brooklands. Destroyed at Shoreham 29 June 1913.
Type E (Avro 500) seven machines delivered between May 1912 - April 1913 to the War Office. Serial Nos.404-406, 430, 432-433, 448 used at CFS Upavon.
Two machines delivered May 1913 and February 1914 to Admiralty contract, serial Nos.41 and 150 used at Hendon and Eastchurch.
One machine to Portuguese Government delivered Lisbon October 1912 named Republica.
One machine first flight July 1913 to private owner at Hendon later with RNAS serial No.939.
One machine to Hall School at Hendon January 1914, later with the RFC serial No.491.
Type Es (Avro 502) 5 machines delivered between April-June 1913. to War Office contract. Serial Nos.285, 288-291.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type F monoplane
One of the first aeroplanes where the pilot was seated inside the fuselage for the maximum protection. The pilot entered through a door in the roof of the cabin and was provided with a celluloid windscreen and various windows for vision. In addition a circular opening was provided on each side. The fuselage was built with a joint, at a point midway between the wing and the tail, for ease of dismantling and transport. The undercarriage and tail units were similar to those of the type E. The wing, of single spar construction, was attached at the fuselage centerline and was braced to the fuselage by a kingpost below and a pylon above.
The monoplane was flown at Brooklands on 1 May 1912 for the first time by W. Parke, who was involved at the end of May in a forced landing at Weybridge. After repairs at Brooklands it saw little use until 13 September, when being flown by R.H. Barnwell, it turned over on landing and was not repaired.
Power: 35hp Viale five-cylinder air-cooled radial previously fitted in the sixth Type D. Currently preserved in the Science Museum.
Data
Span 28ft
Length 23 ft
Area 158 sq ft
Weight 550lb
Weight allup 800lb
Max speed 65 mph
One of the first aeroplanes where the pilot was seated inside the fuselage for the maximum protection. The pilot entered through a door in the roof of the cabin and was provided with a celluloid windscreen and various windows for vision. In addition a circular opening was provided on each side. The fuselage was built with a joint, at a point midway between the wing and the tail, for ease of dismantling and transport. The undercarriage and tail units were similar to those of the type E. The wing, of single spar construction, was attached at the fuselage centerline and was braced to the fuselage by a kingpost below and a pylon above.
The monoplane was flown at Brooklands on 1 May 1912 for the first time by W. Parke, who was involved at the end of May in a forced landing at Weybridge. After repairs at Brooklands it saw little use until 13 September, when being flown by R.H. Barnwell, it turned over on landing and was not repaired.
Power: 35hp Viale five-cylinder air-cooled radial previously fitted in the sixth Type D. Currently preserved in the Science Museum.
Data
Span 28ft
Length 23 ft
Area 158 sq ft
Weight 550lb
Weight allup 800lb
Max speed 65 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type G biplane
The monoplane was followed by a two-seater cabin biplane, two of which were intended as entries Nos.6 and 7 in the Military Aeroplane Competition of August 1912; this was amongst the first enclosed type biplanes in the world.
The crew were seated one behind the other in the narrow fuselage which filled the gap between the wings. The warping wings, the tail unit and the undercarriage were basically components of the Type 500. The non-availability of the new 60hp ABC engine prevented completion of the second machine and, with limited time available, the first machine with a 60hp Green was delivered to Larkhill for the trials unflown. First flight by Wilfred Parke took place on 7 August 1912 in poor conditions, and the machine overturned on landing from a curtailed flight. The damage was sufficient for the aircraft to be returned to Manchester for repair, but it was back at Larkhill a week later. Parke participated further in the trials, making a notable recovery from a spin in what became known as 'Parkes Dive' and although attempting all the tests, the machine did not take a major award, mainly owing to its poor rate of climb. On 24 October F.P Raynham, flying the Type G from Brooklands, established a British Duration Record of 7hr 31 min, which was broken later that day by H.G. Hawker flying the Sopwith-Wright biplane.
The Type G was transferred to Shoreham, but was not greatly in evidence, although still in the hangar there in February 1913.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 10ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 35ft 3in
Chord 4ft 9in
Area 310 sq ft
Tailplane span 8ft
Tailplane area 20 sq ft
Elevators area 14 sq ft
Length 28ft 6in
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 1,191 lb
Weight allup 1,792lb
Initial rate of climb 105 ft per min
Max speed 62 mph
Range 345 miles
The monoplane was followed by a two-seater cabin biplane, two of which were intended as entries Nos.6 and 7 in the Military Aeroplane Competition of August 1912; this was amongst the first enclosed type biplanes in the world.
The crew were seated one behind the other in the narrow fuselage which filled the gap between the wings. The warping wings, the tail unit and the undercarriage were basically components of the Type 500. The non-availability of the new 60hp ABC engine prevented completion of the second machine and, with limited time available, the first machine with a 60hp Green was delivered to Larkhill for the trials unflown. First flight by Wilfred Parke took place on 7 August 1912 in poor conditions, and the machine overturned on landing from a curtailed flight. The damage was sufficient for the aircraft to be returned to Manchester for repair, but it was back at Larkhill a week later. Parke participated further in the trials, making a notable recovery from a spin in what became known as 'Parkes Dive' and although attempting all the tests, the machine did not take a major award, mainly owing to its poor rate of climb. On 24 October F.P Raynham, flying the Type G from Brooklands, established a British Duration Record of 7hr 31 min, which was broken later that day by H.G. Hawker flying the Sopwith-Wright biplane.
The Type G was transferred to Shoreham, but was not greatly in evidence, although still in the hangar there in February 1913.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 10ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 35ft 3in
Chord 4ft 9in
Area 310 sq ft
Tailplane span 8ft
Tailplane area 20 sq ft
Elevators area 14 sq ft
Length 28ft 6in
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 1,191 lb
Weight allup 1,792lb
Initial rate of climb 105 ft per min
Max speed 62 mph
Range 345 miles
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type 501
This machine, built and tested initially in amphibian form, was flown for the first time by H. Stanley Adams at Windermere in January 1913.
The large central float, designed by O.T. Gnosspelius, housed three wheels, two at the rear, one at the front, and was sprung. This undercarriage, together with small wingtip floats, contributed greatly to the weight and was replaced by twin floats, with a tail float fitted to the sprung rudder. In this form the aircraft was delivered to the Isle of Grain for trials, but proved to be unacceptable as a seaplane. The machine was converted to a land-plane and delivered to Eastchurch as serial No. 16, against Contract No.77177/1913. It operated from Dover and Dunkirk, without much success, being finally deleted in February 1916.
The construction of the 501, which generally followed previous Avro practice, had two bay wings with strut braced top wing extensions and parallel chord ailerons, later inversely tapered ailerons were fitted to the top wings only.
Power: 100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span top 47ft 6in
Bottom 39ft 6in
Area 478 sq ft
Height 12ft 6in
Weight 1,740lb
Weight allup 2,700lb
Max speed 55 mph seaplane,
65 mph (land-plane)
This machine, built and tested initially in amphibian form, was flown for the first time by H. Stanley Adams at Windermere in January 1913.
The large central float, designed by O.T. Gnosspelius, housed three wheels, two at the rear, one at the front, and was sprung. This undercarriage, together with small wingtip floats, contributed greatly to the weight and was replaced by twin floats, with a tail float fitted to the sprung rudder. In this form the aircraft was delivered to the Isle of Grain for trials, but proved to be unacceptable as a seaplane. The machine was converted to a land-plane and delivered to Eastchurch as serial No. 16, against Contract No.77177/1913. It operated from Dover and Dunkirk, without much success, being finally deleted in February 1916.
The construction of the 501, which generally followed previous Avro practice, had two bay wings with strut braced top wing extensions and parallel chord ailerons, later inversely tapered ailerons were fitted to the top wings only.
Power: 100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span top 47ft 6in
Bottom 39ft 6in
Area 478 sq ft
Height 12ft 6in
Weight 1,740lb
Weight allup 2,700lb
Max speed 55 mph seaplane,
65 mph (land-plane)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type 503 (originally Type H)
This larger version of the Type 501 was first flown at Shoreham by FP Raynham on 28 May 1913, with a similar twin float arrangement to that used finally on the 501. After completion of trials the machine was sold to the German Navy and was identified as D12. in that service. Three more of the type Serial Nos.513 were built for the RNAS against Contract No.CP36208/1913 and were delivered to the Isle of Grain in September-October 1913 as seaplanes. All three were later converted to land-planes for use as trainers at various stations but were all deleted by January 1916.
Power: 100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder or Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotaries driving a 8ft 9in diameter propeller. Replaced in Nos.523 by 60hp Le Rhone in service.
Data
Span top 50ft
Span bottom 47ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft 9in
Area 567 sq ft
Length 33ft 6in
Height 12ft 8in
Weight allup 2,2001b
Initial rate of'climb 225 ft per min
Max speed 50 mph (seaplane)
This larger version of the Type 501 was first flown at Shoreham by FP Raynham on 28 May 1913, with a similar twin float arrangement to that used finally on the 501. After completion of trials the machine was sold to the German Navy and was identified as D12. in that service. Three more of the type Serial Nos.513 were built for the RNAS against Contract No.CP36208/1913 and were delivered to the Isle of Grain in September-October 1913 as seaplanes. All three were later converted to land-planes for use as trainers at various stations but were all deleted by January 1916.
Power: 100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder or Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotaries driving a 8ft 9in diameter propeller. Replaced in Nos.523 by 60hp Le Rhone in service.
Data
Span top 50ft
Span bottom 47ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft 9in
Area 567 sq ft
Length 33ft 6in
Height 12ft 8in
Weight allup 2,2001b
Initial rate of'climb 225 ft per min
Max speed 50 mph (seaplane)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type 504
When A.V. Roe initiated work in November 1912 on a development of the Type 500, he could not have anticipated the success that this machine would have. It became mainly a training machine during the war period and with progressive improvements, continued in this role until 1932. Many other uses, both civil and military, were found for this outstanding aircraft, which was also built in large numbers by other contractors in wartime and in various countries around the world. The major changes to the aircraft or its role were identified by a suffix and ranged from 504A to 504S. These variants were started in 1915 and so are outside the period of this work.
Although Roe must rightly be given credit for the basic design, credit must also be given to his three designers, Chadwick, Taylor and Broadsmith, whose contributions were to make the overall design one which was outstanding.
The prototype 504 flew at Brooklands on 18 September 1913, having been partly built at Brownsfield Mills and completed at Clifton St. works and then delivered to Brooklands the day before. Just two days after the first flight it competed in the Aerial Derby, in which contest Raynham finished fourth at 66.5 mph. Following further trials the machine was returned to Manchester for various modifications, including replacing the bulky cowling with one of circular form. The tapered ailerons, which were fixed at the inboard end, and were warped separately from the wing structure, were replaced with hinged parallel units. A number of less obvious changes were also made. After further flight trials the machine was bought by the Daily Mail and, from April 1914, was flown as a twin float seaplane. The outbreak of war saw the prototype 504 seaplane commandeered at Shoreham by the Navy, but it crashed on land during the delivery flight in June 1914 and was not rebuilt.
Production for the War Office began in mid-1913, when a contract for twelve aircraft was issued and further aircraft for trials and for private owners, probably four, were put in hand. The Admiralty also placed orders for seven machines in early 1914 and a further forty-four were ordered by the War Office, before the end of the year.
The single 504 fitted with the ABC engine was one sold to Armstrong Whitworth Ltd. to test the first engine of the type made by that company. The engine was fitted to a machine which arrived at Brooklands from Manchester on 16 February 1913, but the engine was not a success and after only one flight in April the project was abandoned.
Power:
80hp Gnome and Gnome Monosoupape seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries.
100hp ABC eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 36ft
Area 330 sq ft
Length 29ft 5in
Height 10ft 5in
Weight land-plane 924 lb
Weight allup 1,574 lb (Prototype 1,550 lb)
Weight seaplane 1,070lb
Weight allup 1,717lb
Climb to 3,500 ft prototype 9min 30sec Gnome
7min Monosoupape
Max speed land-plane 82 mph
seaplane 75 mph
Production.
Prototype. First flight at Brooklands 18 September 1913, destroyed. June 1914. S/No.889.
Four Aircraft for trials and private sales.
Twelve to the War Office. Serial Nos.376, 390, 397-398, 637-638, 652, 665, 685, 692, 715-716
Forty-four to the War Office. Serial Nos.750-793.
Seven to the Admiralty. Serial Nos.179, 873-878
When A.V. Roe initiated work in November 1912 on a development of the Type 500, he could not have anticipated the success that this machine would have. It became mainly a training machine during the war period and with progressive improvements, continued in this role until 1932. Many other uses, both civil and military, were found for this outstanding aircraft, which was also built in large numbers by other contractors in wartime and in various countries around the world. The major changes to the aircraft or its role were identified by a suffix and ranged from 504A to 504S. These variants were started in 1915 and so are outside the period of this work.
Although Roe must rightly be given credit for the basic design, credit must also be given to his three designers, Chadwick, Taylor and Broadsmith, whose contributions were to make the overall design one which was outstanding.
The prototype 504 flew at Brooklands on 18 September 1913, having been partly built at Brownsfield Mills and completed at Clifton St. works and then delivered to Brooklands the day before. Just two days after the first flight it competed in the Aerial Derby, in which contest Raynham finished fourth at 66.5 mph. Following further trials the machine was returned to Manchester for various modifications, including replacing the bulky cowling with one of circular form. The tapered ailerons, which were fixed at the inboard end, and were warped separately from the wing structure, were replaced with hinged parallel units. A number of less obvious changes were also made. After further flight trials the machine was bought by the Daily Mail and, from April 1914, was flown as a twin float seaplane. The outbreak of war saw the prototype 504 seaplane commandeered at Shoreham by the Navy, but it crashed on land during the delivery flight in June 1914 and was not rebuilt.
Production for the War Office began in mid-1913, when a contract for twelve aircraft was issued and further aircraft for trials and for private owners, probably four, were put in hand. The Admiralty also placed orders for seven machines in early 1914 and a further forty-four were ordered by the War Office, before the end of the year.
The single 504 fitted with the ABC engine was one sold to Armstrong Whitworth Ltd. to test the first engine of the type made by that company. The engine was fitted to a machine which arrived at Brooklands from Manchester on 16 February 1913, but the engine was not a success and after only one flight in April the project was abandoned.
Power:
80hp Gnome and Gnome Monosoupape seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries.
100hp ABC eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 36ft
Area 330 sq ft
Length 29ft 5in
Height 10ft 5in
Weight land-plane 924 lb
Weight allup 1,574 lb (Prototype 1,550 lb)
Weight seaplane 1,070lb
Weight allup 1,717lb
Climb to 3,500 ft prototype 9min 30sec Gnome
7min Monosoupape
Max speed land-plane 82 mph
seaplane 75 mph
Production.
Prototype. First flight at Brooklands 18 September 1913, destroyed. June 1914. S/No.889.
Four Aircraft for trials and private sales.
Twelve to the War Office. Serial Nos.376, 390, 397-398, 637-638, 652, 665, 685, 692, 715-716
Forty-four to the War Office. Serial Nos.750-793.
Seven to the Admiralty. Serial Nos.179, 873-878
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type 506 (Originally Type J)
This larger version of the Type 508 was to be a two-seat, twin float seaplane, but it was not built and remained only as a project in 1913.
Power: 160hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 70ft
Area 980 sq ft
Length. 44ft
Height 15ft 5in
Weight allup 3,800lb
Endurance 4 hr
AVRO Type 508
This, the first pusher of Avro design, was intended for reconnaissance purposes, with the observer well forward in the front cockpit. The tail booms were of steel tube but the nacelle and wings were of wooden construction, derived from earlier Avro types. The undercarriage and engine installation were based on the units of the Type 504.
The single prototype was exhibited incomplete in January 1914 at a show in Manchester and in March, as a finished aircraft, at the Olympia Aero Show. The machine is known to have been available for use at Brooklands in April 1915 and may possibly have been tested as a seaplane in the Southampton area, as reported in The Aeroplane of 9 September 1914. The machine was sold to the Hall School of Flying at Hendon, but seemingly was not used, being still there in a dismantled state in April 1916.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 44ft
Area 468 sq ft
Length 26ft 9in
Height 10ft
Weight 1,000lb
Weight allup 1,680lb
Max speed 65 mph
Endurance 4hr
This larger version of the Type 508 was to be a two-seat, twin float seaplane, but it was not built and remained only as a project in 1913.
Power: 160hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 70ft
Area 980 sq ft
Length. 44ft
Height 15ft 5in
Weight allup 3,800lb
Endurance 4 hr
AVRO Type 508
This, the first pusher of Avro design, was intended for reconnaissance purposes, with the observer well forward in the front cockpit. The tail booms were of steel tube but the nacelle and wings were of wooden construction, derived from earlier Avro types. The undercarriage and engine installation were based on the units of the Type 504.
The single prototype was exhibited incomplete in January 1914 at a show in Manchester and in March, as a finished aircraft, at the Olympia Aero Show. The machine is known to have been available for use at Brooklands in April 1915 and may possibly have been tested as a seaplane in the Southampton area, as reported in The Aeroplane of 9 September 1914. The machine was sold to the Hall School of Flying at Hendon, but seemingly was not used, being still there in a dismantled state in April 1916.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 44ft
Area 468 sq ft
Length 26ft 9in
Height 10ft
Weight 1,000lb
Weight allup 1,680lb
Max speed 65 mph
Endurance 4hr
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type 509
A contract, valued at ?3,384, was received from the Admiralty in January 1914 for a twin-float seaplane with two engines driving pusher propellers. The scheme for this 2/3 seater machine, fitted with radio equipment and a heavy gun in the nose, had been prepared in the previous November. The Navy allocated Serial No.94 to this aircraft, and it appeared on the lists of HM Naval Aircraft at least until October 1914, noted as being on order. Presumably some construction actually took place in the period since January, but the machine was not completed.
Power: Two 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span top 80ft
Span bottom 56ft
Area 931sqft
Length 44ft 3in
Weight 2,800 lb
Weight allup 4,510lb
Max speed 70mph
AVRO Type 513
A design study made in March 1914 for a two-seat, twin float bomber seaplane powered by two 80hp. Gnome engines. The wings were designed to fold, and floats and flying surfaces were interchangeable with those of the Avro 510.
Data
Span top 72ft
Span bottom 47ft.
Length 36ft 6in.
A contract, valued at ?3,384, was received from the Admiralty in January 1914 for a twin-float seaplane with two engines driving pusher propellers. The scheme for this 2/3 seater machine, fitted with radio equipment and a heavy gun in the nose, had been prepared in the previous November. The Navy allocated Serial No.94 to this aircraft, and it appeared on the lists of HM Naval Aircraft at least until October 1914, noted as being on order. Presumably some construction actually took place in the period since January, but the machine was not completed.
Power: Two 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span top 80ft
Span bottom 56ft
Area 931sqft
Length 44ft 3in
Weight 2,800 lb
Weight allup 4,510lb
Max speed 70mph
AVRO Type 513
A design study made in March 1914 for a two-seat, twin float bomber seaplane powered by two 80hp. Gnome engines. The wings were designed to fold, and floats and flying surfaces were interchangeable with those of the Avro 510.
Data
Span top 72ft
Span bottom 47ft.
Length 36ft 6in.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type 510
The first of these machines was intended to compete in the Seaplane Circuit of Britain to be held between 1-15 August 1914, starting from Southampton Water. The contest was canceled and the machine was immediately taken over by the Admiralty for ?2,500 and five more of the same type were ordered. The prototype was delivered by rail to Calshot, where first flight took place in August. F.P. Raynham carried out the flying on behalf of the company. The production aircraft were delivered direct to the RNAS stations at Killingholme and Dundee between December 1914 and April 1915 and were the subject of criticism, which delayed their final acceptance.
The Type 510 had considerable top wing overhang braced to kingposts and was a seaplane with twin main floats, as well as tail and wing tip floats. The first machine sat low on the water and had smoothly shaped floats, mounted on a complex structure of steel tubes, and were sprung internally. Subsequent aircraft embodied fixed pontoon like floats on a revised chassis which raised the machine higher and was probably detrimental to the performance. A fin was not fitted initially to the first machine, but was later added to all aircraft.
The machine was normally flown from the rear cockpit, although dual controls were fitted. The Navy found the 510 to be a disappointing machine with poor performance, and it was mainly used as a single-seater.
Power: 150hp Sunbeam eight-cylinder water-cooled with front radiator. (Later named Crusader)
Data
Span top 63ft
Span bottom 38ft
Chord 5ft 9in
Gap 6ft 6in
Area 564 sq ft
Length 37ft 6 in later 38ft
Weight 2,080 lb
Weight allup 2,800 lb
Max speed 70 mph
Climb to 1,000ft 4 1/2 min
Climb to 3,000ft 20 min
Endurance 4 1/2 hr
Production
No.881 'Circuit' machine to Calshot August 1914. Commandeered by the Admiralty at outbreak of war.
No.130 To Killingholme. June - December 1914.
No.131 To Killingholme 5 February 1915. First flight 15April 1915. by Raynham.
No.132 To Killingholme 17February 1915. First flight 15 April 1915. by Raynham.
No.133 To Dundee. First flight 31 March 1915.
No.134 To Dundee 4 April 1915. First flight 12 April 1915.
The first of these machines was intended to compete in the Seaplane Circuit of Britain to be held between 1-15 August 1914, starting from Southampton Water. The contest was canceled and the machine was immediately taken over by the Admiralty for ?2,500 and five more of the same type were ordered. The prototype was delivered by rail to Calshot, where first flight took place in August. F.P. Raynham carried out the flying on behalf of the company. The production aircraft were delivered direct to the RNAS stations at Killingholme and Dundee between December 1914 and April 1915 and were the subject of criticism, which delayed their final acceptance.
The Type 510 had considerable top wing overhang braced to kingposts and was a seaplane with twin main floats, as well as tail and wing tip floats. The first machine sat low on the water and had smoothly shaped floats, mounted on a complex structure of steel tubes, and were sprung internally. Subsequent aircraft embodied fixed pontoon like floats on a revised chassis which raised the machine higher and was probably detrimental to the performance. A fin was not fitted initially to the first machine, but was later added to all aircraft.
The machine was normally flown from the rear cockpit, although dual controls were fitted. The Navy found the 510 to be a disappointing machine with poor performance, and it was mainly used as a single-seater.
Power: 150hp Sunbeam eight-cylinder water-cooled with front radiator. (Later named Crusader)
Data
Span top 63ft
Span bottom 38ft
Chord 5ft 9in
Gap 6ft 6in
Area 564 sq ft
Length 37ft 6 in later 38ft
Weight 2,080 lb
Weight allup 2,800 lb
Max speed 70 mph
Climb to 1,000ft 4 1/2 min
Climb to 3,000ft 20 min
Endurance 4 1/2 hr
Production
No.881 'Circuit' machine to Calshot August 1914. Commandeered by the Admiralty at outbreak of war.
No.130 To Killingholme. June - December 1914.
No.131 To Killingholme 5 February 1915. First flight 15April 1915. by Raynham.
No.132 To Killingholme 17February 1915. First flight 15 April 1915. by Raynham.
No.133 To Dundee. First flight 31 March 1915.
No.134 To Dundee 4 April 1915. First flight 12 April 1915.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Type 511 'Arrowscout'
This single-seat scout biplane made its first appearance at the Olympia Aero Show of March 1914. It flew for the first time at Brooklands shortly before the Aerial Derby of May 23, for which it carried racing number 14. The contest was postponed due to poor weather, but Raynham flew to Hendon from Brooklands and demonstrated the aircraft. The race was flown on 6 June, but the 'Arrowscout' was by this time modified to become the Type 514, with alternative wings and other changes to improve its disappointing performance.
The swept wings, a new departure, introduced design problems and justified the manufacture of the alternative straight wings as a safeguard. Another new feature was the fitting of air brakes, which formed the inboard sections of the lower wings, to reduce the landing speed.
Power: 80hp Gnome Monosoupape seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Gap 5ft 3in
Area 236 sq ft
Length 22ft 9in
Weight 675 lb
Weight allup 1,165 1b
Max speed 95-100 mph
AVRO Type 512
A projected land-plane with one 65hp Austro-Daimler engine.
Span 26ft.
AVRO Type 514
The main changes to the Type 511, to improve its performance, were to replace the wings with unswept units with conventional interplane struts and to redesign the undercarriage, which was an unsprung vee type and without the central skid. The aircraft was entered as No.20 in the postponed Aerial Derby, but its undercarriage failed on takeoff at Brooklands, before the event.
Although the 514 was repaired at Manchester and flown by Raynham at Southport in July, no further development took place.
AVRO Type 515
This was a September 1914 design for a biplane with a 150hp Sunbeam engine.
This single-seat scout biplane made its first appearance at the Olympia Aero Show of March 1914. It flew for the first time at Brooklands shortly before the Aerial Derby of May 23, for which it carried racing number 14. The contest was postponed due to poor weather, but Raynham flew to Hendon from Brooklands and demonstrated the aircraft. The race was flown on 6 June, but the 'Arrowscout' was by this time modified to become the Type 514, with alternative wings and other changes to improve its disappointing performance.
The swept wings, a new departure, introduced design problems and justified the manufacture of the alternative straight wings as a safeguard. Another new feature was the fitting of air brakes, which formed the inboard sections of the lower wings, to reduce the landing speed.
Power: 80hp Gnome Monosoupape seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Gap 5ft 3in
Area 236 sq ft
Length 22ft 9in
Weight 675 lb
Weight allup 1,165 1b
Max speed 95-100 mph
AVRO Type 512
A projected land-plane with one 65hp Austro-Daimler engine.
Span 26ft.
AVRO Type 514
The main changes to the Type 511, to improve its performance, were to replace the wings with unswept units with conventional interplane struts and to redesign the undercarriage, which was an unsprung vee type and without the central skid. The aircraft was entered as No.20 in the postponed Aerial Derby, but its undercarriage failed on takeoff at Brooklands, before the event.
Although the 514 was repaired at Manchester and flown by Raynham at Southport in July, no further development took place.
AVRO Type 515
This was a September 1914 design for a biplane with a 150hp Sunbeam engine.
The Avro 511 at Hendon on 23 May 1914 carrying the racing number 14 for the Aerial Derby race around London (which was cancelled owing to bad weather). It was to have been flown by Fred Raynham, seen here in the cockpit.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
Avro 519
Built for the Admiralty early in 1916, the Avro 519 single seat biplane bore a distinct resemblance to the Avro 510 seaplane of two years previously. Few technical details of the Avro 519 survive but it appears to have been fitted with the same wing structure as the 510, redesigned for folding and rigged with decreased gap. An enlarged version of the standard central skid undercarriage replaced the floats and the neat nose radiator was abandoned in favour of an ugly, high drag unit above and behind the engine which blocked the pilot's forward view. A large fin and rudder of the type used on the Avro 504B was also fitted.
The exact purpose of the aircraft is not known but pilot-comfort was evidently of some importance for the flat top of the Avro 510 fuselage gave place to a deep and generous decking. An elongated secondary structure on top of this formed a streamlined headrest.
Four prototypes were built, comprising two Avro 519s for the R.N.A.S. and two Avro 519A two seaters for the R.F.C. The latter were fitted with a stout Vee strut undercarriage with no skid, and photographs taken by test pilot Capt. F. T. Courtney suggest that all four were delivered to Farnborough for tests during or before May 1916. It is said that neither the R.N.A.S. nor the R.F.C. considered them strong enough for the powerful 150 h.p. engine, and apart from the fact that they were dubbed "The Big Avros" and that their rate of climb was poor, no hint of their career or ultimate fate remains.
SPECIFICATION AND DATA
Manufacturers: A. V. Roe and Co. Ltd., Clifton Street, Miles Platting, Manchester
Power Plant: One 150 h.p. Sunbeam Nubian
Production:
(For R.N.A.S.) 8440 and 8441
(For R.F.C.) 1614 and 1615
Built for the Admiralty early in 1916, the Avro 519 single seat biplane bore a distinct resemblance to the Avro 510 seaplane of two years previously. Few technical details of the Avro 519 survive but it appears to have been fitted with the same wing structure as the 510, redesigned for folding and rigged with decreased gap. An enlarged version of the standard central skid undercarriage replaced the floats and the neat nose radiator was abandoned in favour of an ugly, high drag unit above and behind the engine which blocked the pilot's forward view. A large fin and rudder of the type used on the Avro 504B was also fitted.
The exact purpose of the aircraft is not known but pilot-comfort was evidently of some importance for the flat top of the Avro 510 fuselage gave place to a deep and generous decking. An elongated secondary structure on top of this formed a streamlined headrest.
Four prototypes were built, comprising two Avro 519s for the R.N.A.S. and two Avro 519A two seaters for the R.F.C. The latter were fitted with a stout Vee strut undercarriage with no skid, and photographs taken by test pilot Capt. F. T. Courtney suggest that all four were delivered to Farnborough for tests during or before May 1916. It is said that neither the R.N.A.S. nor the R.F.C. considered them strong enough for the powerful 150 h.p. engine, and apart from the fact that they were dubbed "The Big Avros" and that their rate of climb was poor, no hint of their career or ultimate fate remains.
SPECIFICATION AND DATA
Manufacturers: A. V. Roe and Co. Ltd., Clifton Street, Miles Platting, Manchester
Power Plant: One 150 h.p. Sunbeam Nubian
Production:
(For R.N.A.S.) 8440 and 8441
(For R.F.C.) 1614 and 1615
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BADEN-POWELL gliders (Major B. Fletcher Smythe Baden-Powell, 32 Prince's Gate, London)
Major Baden-Powell was the brother of the Chief Scout. He had experience of military ballooning and later carried out experiments with man-lifting kites. His 36ft kite of 500 sq ft area was the first to lift a man, on 27 June 1894. In 1897 he made a small ornithopter glider which was not successful. In 1904 he experimented with gliders from a chute over water at the Crystal Palace, assisted by J.T.C. Moore-Brabazon. The gliders were tried in both biplane and monoplane form, achieving short glides on a number of occasions. The crude structure illustrated may have been involved in these trials, but could have been a mockup of the later Quadruplane.
Major Baden-Powell was the brother of the Chief Scout. He had experience of military ballooning and later carried out experiments with man-lifting kites. His 36ft kite of 500 sq ft area was the first to lift a man, on 27 June 1894. In 1897 he made a small ornithopter glider which was not successful. In 1904 he experimented with gliders from a chute over water at the Crystal Palace, assisted by J.T.C. Moore-Brabazon. The gliders were tried in both biplane and monoplane form, achieving short glides on a number of occasions. The crude structure illustrated may have been involved in these trials, but could have been a mockup of the later Quadruplane.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BADEN-POWELL quadruplane
Designed by Major Baden-Powell, and built in 1909, this machine appeared at the Dagenham Flying Ground in that year. It was basically a pusher biplane with large extra surfaces fore and aft. The pilot sat on the lower center section with the engine directly behind. The fuselage consisted of four bowed metal tubes, meeting together at both front and rear, and braced by spacing members. The lower portion of the forward fuselage was covered in, perhaps for alighting on water. The front surface was the elevator, the larger rear surface was fixed. The wings were rotatable around the main spar for steering. The machine did not fly. The structure of this and his other machines was covered by patent number 6443 of 1906.
Power: 10-12hp Buchet three-cylinder air-cooled fan type semi-radial.
Data
Span 22ft
Length 24ft
BADEN-POWELL quadruplane 1910-1911 version
The construction of another machine appears to have begun in 1910, which was to be powered by a 50hp Antoinette engine, driving twin pusher propellers. It seems that it was not completed, and the only information is that conveyed by the adjacent illustration. Patent No.6443/1906 has some relevance to this and to the earlier machine.
Designed by Major Baden-Powell, and built in 1909, this machine appeared at the Dagenham Flying Ground in that year. It was basically a pusher biplane with large extra surfaces fore and aft. The pilot sat on the lower center section with the engine directly behind. The fuselage consisted of four bowed metal tubes, meeting together at both front and rear, and braced by spacing members. The lower portion of the forward fuselage was covered in, perhaps for alighting on water. The front surface was the elevator, the larger rear surface was fixed. The wings were rotatable around the main spar for steering. The machine did not fly. The structure of this and his other machines was covered by patent number 6443 of 1906.
Power: 10-12hp Buchet three-cylinder air-cooled fan type semi-radial.
Data
Span 22ft
Length 24ft
BADEN-POWELL quadruplane 1910-1911 version
The construction of another machine appears to have begun in 1910, which was to be powered by a 50hp Antoinette engine, driving twin pusher propellers. It seems that it was not completed, and the only information is that conveyed by the adjacent illustration. Patent No.6443/1906 has some relevance to this and to the earlier machine.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BADEN-POWELL SCOUT monoplane
This single-seat pusher monoplane was designed by Baden-Powell and built by Handley Page at Barking in 1909. It was exhibited at the Stanley Show in November 1910. The machine, also known as The Midge, had a notice 'Scout Aero Club' alongside.
Like his earlier machine, the Scout was constructed with four curved longerons meeting at the nose and tail, these were made of bamboo and were spaced at the center by a substantial X-shaped wooden member, which also formed the engine mounting and the rear support for the pilot's seat. The machine was controlled by the front elevator, this surface being divided to provide directional control. The tailplane and fin were apparently fixed surfaces. There is no record that the aircraft flew.
Power: 10- 12hp Buchet three-cylinder air-cooled semi-radial driving a 5ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 22ft
Weight 140 lb
Wing area 90 sq ft
Total area 150 sq ft
Length 20ft
This single-seat pusher monoplane was designed by Baden-Powell and built by Handley Page at Barking in 1909. It was exhibited at the Stanley Show in November 1910. The machine, also known as The Midge, had a notice 'Scout Aero Club' alongside.
Like his earlier machine, the Scout was constructed with four curved longerons meeting at the nose and tail, these were made of bamboo and were spaced at the center by a substantial X-shaped wooden member, which also formed the engine mounting and the rear support for the pilot's seat. The machine was controlled by the front elevator, this surface being divided to provide directional control. The tailplane and fin were apparently fixed surfaces. There is no record that the aircraft flew.
Power: 10- 12hp Buchet three-cylinder air-cooled semi-radial driving a 5ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 22ft
Weight 140 lb
Wing area 90 sq ft
Total area 150 sq ft
Length 20ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BAIRD monoplane (Andrew B. Baird, 115 High St., Rothesay, Isle of Bute, Scotland)
Constructed by a master blacksmith in 1909-1910, this was a single-seat tractor monoplane, which was completed and tested at Ettrick Bay in September 1910. Although the machine rose into the air briefly, it was not capable of sustained flight, and was damaged and not repaired. The machine was said to embody features of the Bleriot and Antoinette with a Demoiselle type tail.
The fuselage was of triangular section with bamboo longerons and steel tube cross members braced by wires. The wings were heavily cambered, of parallel chord and covered with a single layer of fabric.
The engine is believed to have been made by Alexander Bros, of Edinburgh, as shown at the Scottish Motor Show in January 1910.
Power: 20hp Alexander four-cylinder inline air and water-cooled
Data
Span 29ft
Wing area 180 sq ft
Weight 380 lb
Constructed by a master blacksmith in 1909-1910, this was a single-seat tractor monoplane, which was completed and tested at Ettrick Bay in September 1910. Although the machine rose into the air briefly, it was not capable of sustained flight, and was damaged and not repaired. The machine was said to embody features of the Bleriot and Antoinette with a Demoiselle type tail.
The fuselage was of triangular section with bamboo longerons and steel tube cross members braced by wires. The wings were heavily cambered, of parallel chord and covered with a single layer of fabric.
The engine is believed to have been made by Alexander Bros, of Edinburgh, as shown at the Scottish Motor Show in January 1910.
Power: 20hp Alexander four-cylinder inline air and water-cooled
Data
Span 29ft
Wing area 180 sq ft
Weight 380 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BALSTON ornithopters (R.M. Balston, Mereworth, Kent)
Little is known of Balston's machines, the earliest being reported built at Cadland, near Southampton in 1895-1900, referred to as an 'orthornicopter'. He built a large model to compete in the Daily Mail contest at Alexandra Palace in 1907, when A.V. Roe won the main prize. The man carrying machine followed in 1908 and was built mainly of bamboo. His patent No.23235 of 1905 relates to folding wings for aircraft to facilitate transport.
Power: 1 1/2hp driving two-bladed propeller
Data
Span 17ft
Little is known of Balston's machines, the earliest being reported built at Cadland, near Southampton in 1895-1900, referred to as an 'orthornicopter'. He built a large model to compete in the Daily Mail contest at Alexandra Palace in 1907, when A.V. Roe won the main prize. The man carrying machine followed in 1908 and was built mainly of bamboo. His patent No.23235 of 1905 relates to folding wings for aircraft to facilitate transport.
Power: 1 1/2hp driving two-bladed propeller
Data
Span 17ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BARBER monoplane (Horatio C. Barber)
This machine was constructed by Howard Wright and designer W.O. Manning at Battersea during 1908-1909 and was tested at Larkhill from June 1909.
It was a two-seater with passenger in front and incorporated Barber's patented system of automatic stability (Patent No. 1999 of January 1909). This system required the wings to be hinged at the fuselage so that the dihedral angle could be varied by the control of the bracing wires, which passed over kingposts. Wing warping appears to have replaced the original scheme for wing tip ailerons. During the course of the trials various features were modified, including the shape of the tail surfaces, which were changed to triangular units and the wing tip wheels which were discarded.
The machine did not fly and the trials were abandoned. Barber then went on to form in April 1909, the Aeronautical Syndicate Ltd. which produced machines mainly of the Valkyrie type.
Power: 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving contra-rotating propellers.
Data
Span 32ft
Length 27ft
Wing area 200 sq ft
Weight allup 1,000lb
This machine was constructed by Howard Wright and designer W.O. Manning at Battersea during 1908-1909 and was tested at Larkhill from June 1909.
It was a two-seater with passenger in front and incorporated Barber's patented system of automatic stability (Patent No. 1999 of January 1909). This system required the wings to be hinged at the fuselage so that the dihedral angle could be varied by the control of the bracing wires, which passed over kingposts. Wing warping appears to have replaced the original scheme for wing tip ailerons. During the course of the trials various features were modified, including the shape of the tail surfaces, which were changed to triangular units and the wing tip wheels which were discarded.
The machine did not fly and the trials were abandoned. Barber then went on to form in April 1909, the Aeronautical Syndicate Ltd. which produced machines mainly of the Valkyrie type.
Power: 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving contra-rotating propellers.
Data
Span 32ft
Length 27ft
Wing area 200 sq ft
Weight allup 1,000lb
Horatio Barber's first aeroplane, built for him at Battersea by Howard Wright in 1908-1909, seen at Larkhill on SalIsbury Plain.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BARNES monoplane (G.A. Barnes, Abbey Wood, Kent)
This machine, described as 'similar to an Antoinette', was shown at the Stanley Show in the Agricultural Hall, Islington, in November 1909 in skeleton form.
A single-seat tractor monoplane, it was designed and built by G.A. Barnes, a well known racing motorcyclist, during 1909. The power was provided by a 20hp JAP engine and it was reported to have flown for about a mile and a half at low altitude when tested in October 1909 at Abbey Wood, but was damaged on landing.
The fuselage was of vee-section and the wing tapered in plan.
This machine, described as 'similar to an Antoinette', was shown at the Stanley Show in the Agricultural Hall, Islington, in November 1909 in skeleton form.
A single-seat tractor monoplane, it was designed and built by G.A. Barnes, a well known racing motorcyclist, during 1909. The power was provided by a 20hp JAP engine and it was reported to have flown for about a mile and a half at low altitude when tested in October 1909 at Abbey Wood, but was damaged on landing.
The fuselage was of vee-section and the wing tapered in plan.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BARNWELL Bros, aircraft (Frank Sowter Barnwell and Richard Harold Barnwell. Grampian Motor & Engineering Co., Causewayhead, Stirling, Scotland)
The brothers were members of the Scottish Aeronautical Society, but ran the Grampian Company after training in shipbuilding. Between them they were responsible for the construction of six machines, before they moved on to appointments with other aviation concerns. Their first types were biplane gliders, of which little is recorded. It is believed that two were built from 1905 at Balfron, their parent's home.
BARNWELL Bros, biplane
This lightly built biplane was a single seater pusher powered by a 7hp Peugeot engine. It did not fly when tested in 1908 at Cornton Farm, Causewayhead.
BARNWELL Bros, monoplane
Frank went to America in 1907 and met the Wright brothers and, upon returning, started the construction of a monoplane. Harold designed the engine. The wing spars were made of bamboo and the wing ribs were in pockets in the covering of light sail canvas. The undercarriage had four main wheels and a tailskid. The machine was completed in December 1908 and reached 25 mph on the ground but would not lift off.
Power: 40hp Grampian two-cylinder horizontally opposed air-cooled vee.
The brothers were members of the Scottish Aeronautical Society, but ran the Grampian Company after training in shipbuilding. Between them they were responsible for the construction of six machines, before they moved on to appointments with other aviation concerns. Their first types were biplane gliders, of which little is recorded. It is believed that two were built from 1905 at Balfron, their parent's home.
BARNWELL Bros, biplane
This lightly built biplane was a single seater pusher powered by a 7hp Peugeot engine. It did not fly when tested in 1908 at Cornton Farm, Causewayhead.
BARNWELL Bros, monoplane
Frank went to America in 1907 and met the Wright brothers and, upon returning, started the construction of a monoplane. Harold designed the engine. The wing spars were made of bamboo and the wing ribs were in pockets in the covering of light sail canvas. The undercarriage had four main wheels and a tailskid. The machine was completed in December 1908 and reached 25 mph on the ground but would not lift off.
Power: 40hp Grampian two-cylinder horizontally opposed air-cooled vee.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BARNWELL Bros, biplane
The next effort by the Barnwell brothers was constructed by their Grampian company and was a large single-seat canard biplane. Harold Barnwell succeeded in flying for eighty yards on 8 July 1909, but the machine was damaged on landing. After repairs and with the wingspan reduced to 45ft further trials were carried out on 8 September 1909 using a starting rail. A height of 25ft was reached before the machine was damaged beyond repair on 10 September 1909.
Power: 40hp Humber TT car engine four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving two 10ft diameter pusher propellers by chain.
Data
Span 48ft
Chord 8ft
Gap 7ft 6in
Weight 1,568 lb
The next effort by the Barnwell brothers was constructed by their Grampian company and was a large single-seat canard biplane. Harold Barnwell succeeded in flying for eighty yards on 8 July 1909, but the machine was damaged on landing. After repairs and with the wingspan reduced to 45ft further trials were carried out on 8 September 1909 using a starting rail. A height of 25ft was reached before the machine was damaged beyond repair on 10 September 1909.
Power: 40hp Humber TT car engine four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving two 10ft diameter pusher propellers by chain.
Data
Span 48ft
Chord 8ft
Gap 7ft 6in
Weight 1,568 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BARNWELL monoplane
This was a design by Harold, the elder of the two brothers and was built by the Grampian company including the engine. It is recorded as the sixth machine built by the Barnwells. It was a single-seat tractor low wing monoplane of conventional layout. The sloping radiator with an air intake above the engine crankcase provided a windscreen for the pilot. The axle of the substantial undercarriage with central skid was wire braced to the body.
On 14 January 1911 at Causewayhead near Stirling, Harold made the longest flight of any Scottish aircraft or pilot to that date, and followed this on 30 January 1911 with a flight reaching a height of 200ft, but damaged the machine on landing. For these flights the J.R.K. Law Prize of ?50 was awarded by the Scottish Aeronautical Society. (14 January 1911. 600 yards at a height of 50ft: 30 January 1911 distance 1 mile, endurance 1 min 2 2/3 sec)
The damaged machine was repaired and further flights were carried out at Cambussdrennie Farm, Blair Drummond on 16 August 1911 and 13 October 1911, but these were the last to be reported.
Power: 40hp Grampian two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled.
This was a design by Harold, the elder of the two brothers and was built by the Grampian company including the engine. It is recorded as the sixth machine built by the Barnwells. It was a single-seat tractor low wing monoplane of conventional layout. The sloping radiator with an air intake above the engine crankcase provided a windscreen for the pilot. The axle of the substantial undercarriage with central skid was wire braced to the body.
On 14 January 1911 at Causewayhead near Stirling, Harold made the longest flight of any Scottish aircraft or pilot to that date, and followed this on 30 January 1911 with a flight reaching a height of 200ft, but damaged the machine on landing. For these flights the J.R.K. Law Prize of ?50 was awarded by the Scottish Aeronautical Society. (14 January 1911. 600 yards at a height of 50ft: 30 January 1911 distance 1 mile, endurance 1 min 2 2/3 sec)
The damaged machine was repaired and further flights were carried out at Cambussdrennie Farm, Blair Drummond on 16 August 1911 and 13 October 1911, but these were the last to be reported.
Power: 40hp Grampian two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BARTELT ornithopter (F.T. Bartelt J.P., Corston Lodge, Brislington, Bristol)
This biplane-like machine with beating wings was designed by the chairman of the Polysuphin Co. Ltd. of Bristol and was exhibited at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911.
The rectangular center structure was made of steel tubing and mounted the engine, radiators and chain and crank drive mechanism, which actuated the top and bottom wings alternatively to provide a beating motion in both forward and reverse directions.
The wings, which were tapered, were also made of steel tubing and braced by wires. The fabric covering was loosely applied with the object of this billowing out on the down-stroke to hold the maximum of air.
No further reports of progress appeared and it is certain that this machine was not successful.
Power: 40hp Star four-cylinder inline water-cooled (113 m/m bore 126 m/m stroke)
Data
Span 30ft 6in
Taper 12ft at root to 7ft at tip
Length 12ft.
This biplane-like machine with beating wings was designed by the chairman of the Polysuphin Co. Ltd. of Bristol and was exhibited at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911.
The rectangular center structure was made of steel tubing and mounted the engine, radiators and chain and crank drive mechanism, which actuated the top and bottom wings alternatively to provide a beating motion in both forward and reverse directions.
The wings, which were tapered, were also made of steel tubing and braced by wires. The fabric covering was loosely applied with the object of this billowing out on the down-stroke to hold the maximum of air.
No further reports of progress appeared and it is certain that this machine was not successful.
Power: 40hp Star four-cylinder inline water-cooled (113 m/m bore 126 m/m stroke)
Data
Span 30ft 6in
Taper 12ft at root to 7ft at tip
Length 12ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BARTON-RAWSON multi-plane (Dr. F.A. Barton and F.L. Rawson, St. Helens, Isle of Wight)
This twin-floatplane of bamboo construction was built at St. Helens in 1905 by Dr. Barton, his son Dudley and Rawson with the intention of being powered. Owing to the lack of a light-weight engine, it was tested by towing behind a launch, but was wrecked in the course of these trials on 26 September 1905.
Power: (proposed) 35hp engine driving a 7ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 34ft
Area 1,200 sq ft
Length 36ft
Height 9ft
Twin floats 20ft long 20in wide 4in deep
Weight unpowered 240 lb
This twin-floatplane of bamboo construction was built at St. Helens in 1905 by Dr. Barton, his son Dudley and Rawson with the intention of being powered. Owing to the lack of a light-weight engine, it was tested by towing behind a launch, but was wrecked in the course of these trials on 26 September 1905.
Power: (proposed) 35hp engine driving a 7ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 34ft
Area 1,200 sq ft
Length 36ft
Height 9ft
Twin floats 20ft long 20in wide 4in deep
Weight unpowered 240 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BASS-PATERSON flying boat (Capt. Ernest Bass and Compton C. Paterson)
This machine, also referred to as a 'Bat-Boat,' was built to the ideas of Paterson by S.E. Saunders Ltd. of Cowes, Isle of Wight. It was nearing completion in December 1914, but was destroyed by fire when on test in early 1915 before it could be flown.
The hull of Saunders 'Consuta' construction contained the engine, which drove a pusher propeller by chain. The two bay wings were swept aft at about 30 degrees and provided lateral control by warping. Wing tip floats were mounted flush to the undersides of the wings.
The open tailbooms carried a high mounted tailplane with elevators and large rudder and fin, together with a supporting float for the tail.
Power: 100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Hull length 13ft 9in
This machine, also referred to as a 'Bat-Boat,' was built to the ideas of Paterson by S.E. Saunders Ltd. of Cowes, Isle of Wight. It was nearing completion in December 1914, but was destroyed by fire when on test in early 1915 before it could be flown.
The hull of Saunders 'Consuta' construction contained the engine, which drove a pusher propeller by chain. The two bay wings were swept aft at about 30 degrees and provided lateral control by warping. Wing tip floats were mounted flush to the undersides of the wings.
The open tailbooms carried a high mounted tailplane with elevators and large rudder and fin, together with a supporting float for the tail.
Power: 100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Hull length 13ft 9in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BASTIN ornithopter (T. Hugh Bastin, Clapham, London, SW)
Little is known of this machine, built between 1900 and 1902, except that it had four wings of 25ft span and was 50ft long.
Little is known of this machine, built between 1900 and 1902, except that it had four wings of 25ft span and was 50ft long.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BATCHELOR monoplane (Albert Batchelor, Strood, near Rochester, Kent)
Batchelor built his aircraft in his spare time at the cement works, which he owned, starting work in September 1909. It was taken to Eastchurch when ready in July 1910. The machine had not flown by October and was abandoned.
The single-seat monoplane was fitted with a Bleriot type castering undercarriage with skids and Demoiselle seating position; lateral control was by warping.
Power: 35hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally-opposed air-cooled driving a Cochrane propeller.
Data
Span 28ft
Length 26ft
Weight 480 lb
Batchelor built his aircraft in his spare time at the cement works, which he owned, starting work in September 1909. It was taken to Eastchurch when ready in July 1910. The machine had not flown by October and was abandoned.
The single-seat monoplane was fitted with a Bleriot type castering undercarriage with skids and Demoiselle seating position; lateral control was by warping.
Power: 35hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally-opposed air-cooled driving a Cochrane propeller.
Data
Span 28ft
Length 26ft
Weight 480 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BEER glider (H. Beer, Cardiff, South Wales)
This biplane glider of Wright type with front elevator and rear rudder had a span of 33ft and was constructed in 1912.
This biplane glider of Wright type with front elevator and rear rudder had a span of 33ft and was constructed in 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BELBIN cycleplane (H.W.G. Belbin, 1A William St., New Road, Battersea, London SW)
Belbin was a blacksmith with an inventive turn of mind and decided to enter for the Peugeot Prize of ?400 for the first man to clear 20ft on a man powered cycle aeroplane. Belbin achieved 6ft 11in, which so impressed Grahame-White that he gave him free unlimited access to Hendon aerodrome so that he could continue his experiments there.
The Belbin machine was of quite sophisticated appearance, with ailerons, elevator and rudder, with an auxiliary aerofoil surface mounted above the aviator's head.
Belbin went on to design, build and test amphibious bicycles.
Belbin was a blacksmith with an inventive turn of mind and decided to enter for the Peugeot Prize of ?400 for the first man to clear 20ft on a man powered cycle aeroplane. Belbin achieved 6ft 11in, which so impressed Grahame-White that he gave him free unlimited access to Hendon aerodrome so that he could continue his experiments there.
The Belbin machine was of quite sophisticated appearance, with ailerons, elevator and rudder, with an auxiliary aerofoil surface mounted above the aviator's head.
Belbin went on to design, build and test amphibious bicycles.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BELLAMY biplane (Monsieur Bellamy, Brooklands Track, Weybridge, Surrey)
Bellamy was a flamboyant Frenchman who had experimented in France and Italy in 1906 and claimed a flight of 500m at Modane in France on the biplane which he showed at a Milan exhibition, where it was suspended below a balloon. He arrived in England in December 1906 with a dismantled 'aeroplane', which he stated had been damaged in transit and established himself at Brooklands on the uncompleted site of the Railway Straight. His original experiments in France and Italy are believed to have made use of the Voisin-Archdeacon glider on floats much modified by Bellamy. The machine was described at the time in the Auto and ten years later in Flight and was quite different from that which Bellamy erected at Brooklands.
His arrival at Brooklands followed the offer of a prize by the Brooklands Automobile Racing Club of ?2500 for the first aviator to fly a circuit of the track. Preparatory to attempting flight Bellamy carried out experiments with propellers on a catamaran on the lake in Mr. Locke-King's grounds.
However, at Brooklands, the Bellamy aircraft was constructed on the site, largely from bamboo, and was fitted with a Panhard engine driving a pusher propeller direct on the crankshaft and a tractor propeller on an extension shaft. The machine had a front mounted cruciform fin and horizontal plane, both of triangular shape, and a large flexible tailplane, serving as an elevator control, mounted midway between the top and bottom longerons of the rear structure. The whole machine looked extremely flimsy and unlikely to achieve sustained flight, which in the event it did not.
Power: 35hp Panhard four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled.
Data
Span 48ft
Span tailplane 12ft
Length behind wings 30ft
Bellamy was a flamboyant Frenchman who had experimented in France and Italy in 1906 and claimed a flight of 500m at Modane in France on the biplane which he showed at a Milan exhibition, where it was suspended below a balloon. He arrived in England in December 1906 with a dismantled 'aeroplane', which he stated had been damaged in transit and established himself at Brooklands on the uncompleted site of the Railway Straight. His original experiments in France and Italy are believed to have made use of the Voisin-Archdeacon glider on floats much modified by Bellamy. The machine was described at the time in the Auto and ten years later in Flight and was quite different from that which Bellamy erected at Brooklands.
His arrival at Brooklands followed the offer of a prize by the Brooklands Automobile Racing Club of ?2500 for the first aviator to fly a circuit of the track. Preparatory to attempting flight Bellamy carried out experiments with propellers on a catamaran on the lake in Mr. Locke-King's grounds.
However, at Brooklands, the Bellamy aircraft was constructed on the site, largely from bamboo, and was fitted with a Panhard engine driving a pusher propeller direct on the crankshaft and a tractor propeller on an extension shaft. The machine had a front mounted cruciform fin and horizontal plane, both of triangular shape, and a large flexible tailplane, serving as an elevator control, mounted midway between the top and bottom longerons of the rear structure. The whole machine looked extremely flimsy and unlikely to achieve sustained flight, which in the event it did not.
Power: 35hp Panhard four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled.
Data
Span 48ft
Span tailplane 12ft
Length behind wings 30ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BELLAMY monoplane (Mons Bellamy, Petersham Meadows, Richmond, Surrey.)
Monsieur Bellamy's second known attempt at flight was with a single-seat tailless tractor monoplane on 18 August 1908. This is almost certainly the machine which was reported to be under construction at Old Oak Farm, Shepherds Bush, London in February 1908. The trials were carried out on Petersham Meadows, below the 'Star and Garter Hotel', Richmond, and although the machine taxied well, it failed to take off. The wing span was reported as 14ft which seems unlikely. Weight empty was 700lb and the engine was 30hp of unknown make.
In the summer of 1908 Bellamy was involved in a scheme to advertise a newspaper by a balloon flight across the Channel to France which did not transpire. In March 1909 he was again experimenting with a catamaran to test improved propellers, this time on the Thames at Hammersmith.
Monsieur Bellamy's second known attempt at flight was with a single-seat tailless tractor monoplane on 18 August 1908. This is almost certainly the machine which was reported to be under construction at Old Oak Farm, Shepherds Bush, London in February 1908. The trials were carried out on Petersham Meadows, below the 'Star and Garter Hotel', Richmond, and although the machine taxied well, it failed to take off. The wing span was reported as 14ft which seems unlikely. Weight empty was 700lb and the engine was 30hp of unknown make.
In the summer of 1908 Bellamy was involved in a scheme to advertise a newspaper by a balloon flight across the Channel to France which did not transpire. In March 1909 he was again experimenting with a catamaran to test improved propellers, this time on the Thames at Hammersmith.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BENTON B.I & B.II. biplanes (John Frederick Benton, Manor Farm, Chalvey, near Slough, Buckinghamshire)
The B.I and its development, the B.II, were built with the help of John Allen of Bray Rd., Maidenhead. Both were single-seat, two bay biplanes with equal span wings and open frame fuselages. Power was provided by a 35-50hp NEC vee four-cylinder, water-cooled two-stroke engine driving twin pusher propellers.
Lateral control was by single acting ailerons and control in pitch was by variable incidence wings covered by Patent No.24945/1910. A sprung undercarriage, to counter lateral drift, was also covered by Patent No. 12375/1911. The Benton is believed not to have flown, and the B.II, although entered as No.31 in the 1911 Circuit of Britain Contest, was no more successful.
The B.I and its development, the B.II, were built with the help of John Allen of Bray Rd., Maidenhead. Both were single-seat, two bay biplanes with equal span wings and open frame fuselages. Power was provided by a 35-50hp NEC vee four-cylinder, water-cooled two-stroke engine driving twin pusher propellers.
Lateral control was by single acting ailerons and control in pitch was by variable incidence wings covered by Patent No.24945/1910. A sprung undercarriage, to counter lateral drift, was also covered by Patent No. 12375/1911. The Benton is believed not to have flown, and the B.II, although entered as No.31 in the 1911 Circuit of Britain Contest, was no more successful.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BENTON B.III, IV, V, VI and VII biplanes
The Benton B.III was a conventional tractor biplane with warping wings, powered by the same NEC engine as used on the earlier types. The machine was modified progressively to become the B.IV to B.VII, the most radical change being to introduce hinged trailing edges to the wings, operated by the pilot, to provide camber-changing flaps.
The B.III and its successors were flown successfully between 1912 and 1914 for distances of about a mile from the field at Chalvey. The final version survived in the hangar there until it was scrapped in 1919.
The Benton B.III was a conventional tractor biplane with warping wings, powered by the same NEC engine as used on the earlier types. The machine was modified progressively to become the B.IV to B.VII, the most radical change being to introduce hinged trailing edges to the wings, operated by the pilot, to provide camber-changing flaps.
The B.III and its successors were flown successfully between 1912 and 1914 for distances of about a mile from the field at Chalvey. The final version survived in the hangar there until it was scrapped in 1919.
Benton B.III and later versions were conventional tractor biplanes. The illustration is of the B.VII.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BETT aeroplane (James M. Bett & Co., Beverley Aeroplane Works, Barnes, Surrey)
A design with two 20hp coupled engines was proposed in 1909-1910 and was covered by Patents 27082/1909,7333/1910 and 22001/1910 in conjunction with T.C. Murphy. The machine did not materialize.
A design with two 20hp coupled engines was proposed in 1909-1910 and was covered by Patents 27082/1909,7333/1910 and 22001/1910 in conjunction with T.C. Murphy. The machine did not materialize.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BILLING biplane (Eardley Billing, Aero Construction Co., Shed No.2 Brooklands)
This single-seat tractor biplane was constructed at Brooklands using the wings of the Voisin pusher of C.A. Moreing. The engine was a 40hp ENV Type D. It was originally flown with an uncovered fuselage but fabric was added later.
The machine was in use from May 1911 to the end of the season, becoming nicknamed the 'Oozley Bird'. Eardley, who previously managed the Lane Gliding School, was the brother of Noel Pemberton Billing, and his wife ran the Bluebird restaurant at Brooklands until its closure at the outbreak of war.
Billing had previously made a ground trainer at Brooklands which was exhibited at the Stanley Show in November 1910. Two replica Billing biplanes were made in 1964 for the film 'Those Magnificent Men in their Flying Machines'.
The Billing biplane was crashed on 4 October 1911 by N.S. Percival, who rebuilt it as the Percival Parseval I at the end of 1911. (q.v.)
This single-seat tractor biplane was constructed at Brooklands using the wings of the Voisin pusher of C.A. Moreing. The engine was a 40hp ENV Type D. It was originally flown with an uncovered fuselage but fabric was added later.
The machine was in use from May 1911 to the end of the season, becoming nicknamed the 'Oozley Bird'. Eardley, who previously managed the Lane Gliding School, was the brother of Noel Pemberton Billing, and his wife ran the Bluebird restaurant at Brooklands until its closure at the outbreak of war.
Billing had previously made a ground trainer at Brooklands which was exhibited at the Stanley Show in November 1910. Two replica Billing biplanes were made in 1964 for the film 'Those Magnificent Men in their Flying Machines'.
The Billing biplane was crashed on 4 October 1911 by N.S. Percival, who rebuilt it as the Percival Parseval I at the end of 1911. (q.v.)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BIRMINGHAM AERO Co. (67 Moseley St., Birmingham)
This firm advertised in 1909 that it would manufacture aircraft to customers' designs or their own specially designed Albatross monoplane at prices between ?250 and ?600. There is no evidence that any were built.
BIRMINGHAM AERO CLUB gliders
This club was active from 1911 to 1914 and several members built full size and half-size models. The secretary was G. Haddon Wood, who built two gliders and sent drawings and details of these to Flight and The Aero. The identified gliders built by club members are as follows:
J.H. Else-Mynard
Small monoplane built November 1909 and tried at Sutton Park. Chanute type built early in 1910.
Ernest Noble
Half-size monoplane built early in 1910 and tried in May.
G. Haddon Wood
Haddon 1. Built early 1911 and wrecked 26 August 1911. Wright type with front elevator and double-surfaced wings. Constructed of red deal. Span 32ft Chord 4ft Area 292 sq ft Weight 130 lb
Haddon 2. Completed January 1912; wrecked in a gale November 1912. Rear-mounted control surfaces and single-surfaced wings. Built of bamboo. Span 32ft Chord 6ft Area 416 sq ft Weight 120 lb
Frank Warren
Built a 20ft span monoplane. Wrecked in a gale, unflown in October 1911.
R. Platts
Built a canard monoplane in March 1911 which was wrecked in a gale in October 1911. Subsequently rebuilt as a powered monoplane. Area 222 sq ft Weight 70 lb
Trykle
A biplane similar to Haddon 1, built of bamboo in early 1911. The top wing had upturned tips. Span of lower wing 20ft.
E. Prosser & A.M. Bonehill
These partners built a Chanute type glider in August 1910, which was wrecked at the same time as Haddon 1 on 26 August 1911.
F. Hill
Designed a monoplane glider which was built by the Belmont Aeroplane Co. in 1911. Later converted to a hydroplane with a small engine.
N. Stamps
Completed a Bleriot type monoplane glider in December 1913. Span 30ft Chord 7ft Area 210 sq ft Length 20ft
Club glider
Built from the remains of Haddon 2 and Trykle gliders after they were wrecked in November 1912.
BELMONT glider (Belmont Aeroplane Co., Ladywood, Birmingham)
In 1911 this company built a 40ft span glider to the design of F.Hill with a tapered wing. A low-powered engine was also fitted. (See also Birmingham Aero Club.)
This firm advertised in 1909 that it would manufacture aircraft to customers' designs or their own specially designed Albatross monoplane at prices between ?250 and ?600. There is no evidence that any were built.
BIRMINGHAM AERO CLUB gliders
This club was active from 1911 to 1914 and several members built full size and half-size models. The secretary was G. Haddon Wood, who built two gliders and sent drawings and details of these to Flight and The Aero. The identified gliders built by club members are as follows:
J.H. Else-Mynard
Small monoplane built November 1909 and tried at Sutton Park. Chanute type built early in 1910.
Ernest Noble
Half-size monoplane built early in 1910 and tried in May.
G. Haddon Wood
Haddon 1. Built early 1911 and wrecked 26 August 1911. Wright type with front elevator and double-surfaced wings. Constructed of red deal. Span 32ft Chord 4ft Area 292 sq ft Weight 130 lb
Haddon 2. Completed January 1912; wrecked in a gale November 1912. Rear-mounted control surfaces and single-surfaced wings. Built of bamboo. Span 32ft Chord 6ft Area 416 sq ft Weight 120 lb
Frank Warren
Built a 20ft span monoplane. Wrecked in a gale, unflown in October 1911.
R. Platts
Built a canard monoplane in March 1911 which was wrecked in a gale in October 1911. Subsequently rebuilt as a powered monoplane. Area 222 sq ft Weight 70 lb
Trykle
A biplane similar to Haddon 1, built of bamboo in early 1911. The top wing had upturned tips. Span of lower wing 20ft.
E. Prosser & A.M. Bonehill
These partners built a Chanute type glider in August 1910, which was wrecked at the same time as Haddon 1 on 26 August 1911.
F. Hill
Designed a monoplane glider which was built by the Belmont Aeroplane Co. in 1911. Later converted to a hydroplane with a small engine.
N. Stamps
Completed a Bleriot type monoplane glider in December 1913. Span 30ft Chord 7ft Area 210 sq ft Length 20ft
Club glider
Built from the remains of Haddon 2 and Trykle gliders after they were wrecked in November 1912.
BELMONT glider (Belmont Aeroplane Co., Ladywood, Birmingham)
In 1911 this company built a 40ft span glider to the design of F.Hill with a tapered wing. A low-powered engine was also fitted. (See also Birmingham Aero Club.)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLACK helicopter (R. Black, Mollinsburn and Cumbernauld, near Glasgow, Lanarkshire)
A report in 1909 described this machine as being fitted with two FN motorcycle engines driving a 'multi-blade fan and a two-bladed propeller above the head'. At the back were wings with a crossbar to control incidence. The engine was also reported as a seven-cylinder rotary
Black had previously made an unsuccessful biplane using the same powerplant.
A report in 1909 described this machine as being fitted with two FN motorcycle engines driving a 'multi-blade fan and a two-bladed propeller above the head'. At the back were wings with a crossbar to control incidence. The engine was also reported as a seven-cylinder rotary
Black had previously made an unsuccessful biplane using the same powerplant.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLACKBURN monoplane (Later referred to as the Heavy Type Monoplane)
This high wing monoplane earned the pilot and engine on a platform beneath the wing. The propeller was driven by chain and was carried on a shaft mounted just below the wing, with radiators on either side. The braced girder fuselage structure extended aft to carry a fixed tailplane and a cruciform tail with triangular surfaces, mounted on a universal joint for control in two directions; lateral control was by waiping the wing.
The machine was completed in September 1909 but was damaged beyond repair at Saltburn Sands on 24 May 1909. It had made short hops only and was dismantled later that year at Balm Rd.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller at half engine speed by chain.
Data
Span 24ft
Chord 6ft 5in
Area 170 sq ft
Length 23ft
Weight allup 800lb
Speed estimated 60 mph
A proposed military version with span increased to 30ft and length to 26ft was not built.
This high wing monoplane earned the pilot and engine on a platform beneath the wing. The propeller was driven by chain and was carried on a shaft mounted just below the wing, with radiators on either side. The braced girder fuselage structure extended aft to carry a fixed tailplane and a cruciform tail with triangular surfaces, mounted on a universal joint for control in two directions; lateral control was by waiping the wing.
The machine was completed in September 1909 but was damaged beyond repair at Saltburn Sands on 24 May 1909. It had made short hops only and was dismantled later that year at Balm Rd.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller at half engine speed by chain.
Data
Span 24ft
Chord 6ft 5in
Area 170 sq ft
Length 23ft
Weight allup 800lb
Speed estimated 60 mph
A proposed military version with span increased to 30ft and length to 26ft was not built.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLACKBURN monoplane (Second type, also referred to as Light Type Monoplane)
This single-seat machine was built in 1910 at Benson St. and was taken incomplete to the Blackpool Flying Meeting in July-August 1910, but was first flown at Filey on 8 March 1911. It later flew well and continued in use for some time.
The fuselage design was rather like an Antoinette, but with parallel chord warping wings and a triangulated undercarriage with twin skids.
Power: 40hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial with built in twenty-one reduction gearing
Data
Span 30ft
Length 32ft
BLACKBURN MERCURY monoplanes
The third Blackburn design was basically a two-seat development of its predecessor and nine of these were produced with considerable differences between individual machines. All variants had substantial four wheel undercarriage with side springing. Warping wings were standard, except for a short period when one aircraft was fitted with a tapered wing.
The triangular-section fuselage was covered around the cockpit with polished veneered wood; all aft of this was covered with fabric. A variety of engines, initially an uncowled Isaacson radial, was fitted, but later there were radial and rotary powered machines with ring cowlings and finally a curved cowling and decking back as far as the cockpit. There were three distinct versions of the Mercury, including single seater types for racing and school work, identified as Type B.
The third version incorporated many internal changes, particularly the use of tubular steel wing spars to facilitate wing warping. The first of this version was fitted with a Renault vee-eight engine, although rotary and radial engines were mainly used. This version was known as the Mercury Passenger Type, although one at least was built as a single-seater.
Type I. One aircraft built
Power: 50hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span 38ft 4in
Chord 7ft 6in
Length 33ft
Weight allup 1,000lb
Area 288sq ft
Height. 6ft 9in
Max speed 60 mph
Type II. Mercury B. Two aircraft built
No.1. A single-seater first flown at Filey in July 1911, but destroyed at Brooklands on 22 July 1911.
No.2. A single-seater first flown at Filey 7 July 1911, but converted to a two-seater in August 1911. Damaged at Eastbourne 23 March 1912 and rebuilt as a single-seater. Used at the Filey School from April 1912 to September, then transferred to Hendon School, where used until June 1913, when the school closed. Identified by 'Type B' on rudders and racing number "33" by the cockpit.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 32ft (36ft second machine)
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 200 sq ft (220 sq ft second machine)
Length 31ft (32ft second machine)
Height 8ft 6in
Weight allup 700lb
Max speed 70 mph
Type III. Six aircraft built
No.1 60hp Renault eight-cylinder vee air-cooled. First flight at Filey 6 December 1911 but wrecked there on 6 December 1911. The original parallel chord wing had been replaced with a tapered wing.
No.2 50hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial. First flight May 1912, then used at Hendon School until June 1913. Fitted with a raised top rudder.
No.3 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. First flight at Brooklands 25 December 1911. Taken over by Lt. Spenser Grey RN, but damaged at Weymouth 10 January 1912. Reflown after repair at Eastchurch 21 February 1912, then to Hendon School in September 1912.
No.4 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. First flight at Filey in March 1912. Wings with cutaway roots.
No.5 50hp Anzani six-cylinder air-cooled radial.
No.6 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. First flight at Filey June 1912. Fitted with wings with cutaway roots and redesigned undercarriage.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 6ft 3in
Area 195 sq ft
Length 31ft
Weight allup 800 lb
Height 8ft 6in
Speed with Renault 75 mph
This single-seat machine was built in 1910 at Benson St. and was taken incomplete to the Blackpool Flying Meeting in July-August 1910, but was first flown at Filey on 8 March 1911. It later flew well and continued in use for some time.
The fuselage design was rather like an Antoinette, but with parallel chord warping wings and a triangulated undercarriage with twin skids.
Power: 40hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial with built in twenty-one reduction gearing
Data
Span 30ft
Length 32ft
BLACKBURN MERCURY monoplanes
The third Blackburn design was basically a two-seat development of its predecessor and nine of these were produced with considerable differences between individual machines. All variants had substantial four wheel undercarriage with side springing. Warping wings were standard, except for a short period when one aircraft was fitted with a tapered wing.
The triangular-section fuselage was covered around the cockpit with polished veneered wood; all aft of this was covered with fabric. A variety of engines, initially an uncowled Isaacson radial, was fitted, but later there were radial and rotary powered machines with ring cowlings and finally a curved cowling and decking back as far as the cockpit. There were three distinct versions of the Mercury, including single seater types for racing and school work, identified as Type B.
The third version incorporated many internal changes, particularly the use of tubular steel wing spars to facilitate wing warping. The first of this version was fitted with a Renault vee-eight engine, although rotary and radial engines were mainly used. This version was known as the Mercury Passenger Type, although one at least was built as a single-seater.
Type I. One aircraft built
Power: 50hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span 38ft 4in
Chord 7ft 6in
Length 33ft
Weight allup 1,000lb
Area 288sq ft
Height. 6ft 9in
Max speed 60 mph
Type II. Mercury B. Two aircraft built
No.1. A single-seater first flown at Filey in July 1911, but destroyed at Brooklands on 22 July 1911.
No.2. A single-seater first flown at Filey 7 July 1911, but converted to a two-seater in August 1911. Damaged at Eastbourne 23 March 1912 and rebuilt as a single-seater. Used at the Filey School from April 1912 to September, then transferred to Hendon School, where used until June 1913, when the school closed. Identified by 'Type B' on rudders and racing number "33" by the cockpit.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 32ft (36ft second machine)
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 200 sq ft (220 sq ft second machine)
Length 31ft (32ft second machine)
Height 8ft 6in
Weight allup 700lb
Max speed 70 mph
Type III. Six aircraft built
No.1 60hp Renault eight-cylinder vee air-cooled. First flight at Filey 6 December 1911 but wrecked there on 6 December 1911. The original parallel chord wing had been replaced with a tapered wing.
No.2 50hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial. First flight May 1912, then used at Hendon School until June 1913. Fitted with a raised top rudder.
No.3 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. First flight at Brooklands 25 December 1911. Taken over by Lt. Spenser Grey RN, but damaged at Weymouth 10 January 1912. Reflown after repair at Eastchurch 21 February 1912, then to Hendon School in September 1912.
No.4 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. First flight at Filey in March 1912. Wings with cutaway roots.
No.5 50hp Anzani six-cylinder air-cooled radial.
No.6 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. First flight at Filey June 1912. Fitted with wings with cutaway roots and redesigned undercarriage.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 6ft 3in
Area 195 sq ft
Length 31ft
Weight allup 800 lb
Height 8ft 6in
Speed with Renault 75 mph
The Second Monoplane in unfinished state at the Blackpool Flying Meeting, August 1910, showing the original undercarriage and airscrew. The second Blackburn monoplane flew at Filey in March 1911.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLACKBURN monoplane 1912 single-seater type
This machine was built to the private order of C.E. Foggin and it flew at the end of 1912 in the hands of Harold Blackburn at Leeds. After initial tests it was taken over by the owner early in 1913. Later the hooked undercarriage skids were replaced with more usual curved type and the wingtips were rounded off. A new owner, M.F. Glew, took over but crashed the machine at Wittering in 1914 and it was not rebuilt before the war began. R.O. Shuttleworth acquired the remains in 1938, but rebuilding was delayed by the second outbreak of war. Nevertheless the machine was rebuilt and re-flown on 17 September 1949 at Henlow.
It remains with the Shuttleworth Collection at Old Warden as the oldest flyable British designed aircraft.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 32 ft 1 in
Chord 7ft
Area 236 sq ft
Length 26ft 3in
Height 8ft 9in
Weight 550 lb
Weight allup 980lb
Max speed 60 mph
Endurance 2 1/2 3 hr
This machine was built to the private order of C.E. Foggin and it flew at the end of 1912 in the hands of Harold Blackburn at Leeds. After initial tests it was taken over by the owner early in 1913. Later the hooked undercarriage skids were replaced with more usual curved type and the wingtips were rounded off. A new owner, M.F. Glew, took over but crashed the machine at Wittering in 1914 and it was not rebuilt before the war began. R.O. Shuttleworth acquired the remains in 1938, but rebuilding was delayed by the second outbreak of war. Nevertheless the machine was rebuilt and re-flown on 17 September 1949 at Henlow.
It remains with the Shuttleworth Collection at Old Warden as the oldest flyable British designed aircraft.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 32 ft 1 in
Chord 7ft
Area 236 sq ft
Length 26ft 3in
Height 8ft 9in
Weight 550 lb
Weight allup 980lb
Max speed 60 mph
Endurance 2 1/2 3 hr
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLACKBURN Type E monoplane
This type was designed to meet the first official British specification for a military reconnaissance two-seater. The basic structure was of steel tube and the fuselage was covered with aluminum panels. The tail surfaces were mainly of light steel tube with fabric covering. The warping wings were constructed on two tubular steel spars, as for the Mercury III.
The first machine was built as a single-seater to a private order. The second of the two machines had a fairing behind the pilot which continued down to the dorsal fin and an extra streamlined fuel tank between the undercarriage struts. A developed version remained as a project only.
No.1 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled. First flown at Filey in April 1912 and supplied to Lt. Lawrence of the Indian Aviation Co. Ltd. at Brooklands in May, identified as 'No.1 L'Oiseau Gris'. After further tests this machine was abandoned.
No.2 70hp Renault eight-cylinder vee air-cooled. When tested at Knavesmire, Yorkshire, in June 1912 the machine failed to rise. Except for being shown on the ground at the Cockburn High School, Dewsbury Rd., Leeds, late in 1912, no further use was made of this machine, which it had been planned to enter in the Military Trials, to be flown Lt. Spenser Grey and Capt. R. Gordon.
Data
Span 38ft 4in
Chord 7ft 6in
Weight allup 9501b
Area 290 sq ft
Length 31ft 2in
Max speed 80 mph
Endurance 4hr (1st m/c) 5hr (2nd m/c)
This type was designed to meet the first official British specification for a military reconnaissance two-seater. The basic structure was of steel tube and the fuselage was covered with aluminum panels. The tail surfaces were mainly of light steel tube with fabric covering. The warping wings were constructed on two tubular steel spars, as for the Mercury III.
The first machine was built as a single-seater to a private order. The second of the two machines had a fairing behind the pilot which continued down to the dorsal fin and an extra streamlined fuel tank between the undercarriage struts. A developed version remained as a project only.
No.1 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled. First flown at Filey in April 1912 and supplied to Lt. Lawrence of the Indian Aviation Co. Ltd. at Brooklands in May, identified as 'No.1 L'Oiseau Gris'. After further tests this machine was abandoned.
No.2 70hp Renault eight-cylinder vee air-cooled. When tested at Knavesmire, Yorkshire, in June 1912 the machine failed to rise. Except for being shown on the ground at the Cockburn High School, Dewsbury Rd., Leeds, late in 1912, no further use was made of this machine, which it had been planned to enter in the Military Trials, to be flown Lt. Spenser Grey and Capt. R. Gordon.
Data
Span 38ft 4in
Chord 7ft 6in
Weight allup 9501b
Area 290 sq ft
Length 31ft 2in
Max speed 80 mph
Endurance 4hr (1st m/c) 5hr (2nd m/c)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLACKBURN monoplane Type I
This was the two-seater development of the 1912 machine with more power and the size increased to accommodate the passenger in the front cockpit. Three of the type were built, the first to the order of a private owner, with minor variations between each machine. There were visible differences to the engine cowlings, where cutaways were made to improve the cooling and air intake supply, and later when no cowling was fitted to the radial engine. One machine had a single kingpost and was a single-seater with freight compartment in place of the front cockpit. The original version had one large cockpit for both crew, but this was modified to make two separate cockpits.
The third machine was known as the 'Improved Type F, and this was later modified into a twin-float seaplane with tail float. This was known as the 'Land/Sea' monoplane since the main floats were clamped direct to the original undercarriage structure and the machine could readily be converted back for land use.
Type I. Two machines built
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 7ft diameter propeller.
No.1 Built for Dr. M.G. Christie as a two-seater and first flown on 14 August 1913 at the Yorkshire Aerodrome, Loft house Park, Leeds. It was used extensively until the outbreak of war, when it was commandeered, after which there is no record of its use.
No.2 This was a single-seater with freight compartment and single kingpost. First flown by Harold Blackburn on 14 December 1913. Damaged at York in May 1914. Acquired by W.R. Ding of the Northern Aircraft Co. and converted to a twin-float seaplane at Cockshot Point, Windermere. It was found to be unsatisfactory and not flown.
Improved Type I. One machine built
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary, later replaced by a 100hp Anzani ten-cylinder air-cooled radial when converted to Land/Seaplane. The only machine built was a two-seater shown at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1914. It was commandeered in September 1914 but, being of no military value, was returned to the makers. It was then sold to W.R. Ding of the Northern Aircraft Co. in 1915 as the Land/Sea monoplane. It was first flown on floats on 26 October 1915 at Bowness-on-Windermere, where it was used as a trainer until written off on 1 April 1916.
Data
Span 38ft
Chord 6ft 8in
Area 252 sq ft
Length 28ft 6in
Seaplane length 29ft 6in
Weight (Type I) 950 lb
Allup(Type I) 1,500 lb
Weight (Land/Sea) 1,124 lb
Allup (Land/Sea) 1,733 1b
This was the two-seater development of the 1912 machine with more power and the size increased to accommodate the passenger in the front cockpit. Three of the type were built, the first to the order of a private owner, with minor variations between each machine. There were visible differences to the engine cowlings, where cutaways were made to improve the cooling and air intake supply, and later when no cowling was fitted to the radial engine. One machine had a single kingpost and was a single-seater with freight compartment in place of the front cockpit. The original version had one large cockpit for both crew, but this was modified to make two separate cockpits.
The third machine was known as the 'Improved Type F, and this was later modified into a twin-float seaplane with tail float. This was known as the 'Land/Sea' monoplane since the main floats were clamped direct to the original undercarriage structure and the machine could readily be converted back for land use.
Type I. Two machines built
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 7ft diameter propeller.
No.1 Built for Dr. M.G. Christie as a two-seater and first flown on 14 August 1913 at the Yorkshire Aerodrome, Loft house Park, Leeds. It was used extensively until the outbreak of war, when it was commandeered, after which there is no record of its use.
No.2 This was a single-seater with freight compartment and single kingpost. First flown by Harold Blackburn on 14 December 1913. Damaged at York in May 1914. Acquired by W.R. Ding of the Northern Aircraft Co. and converted to a twin-float seaplane at Cockshot Point, Windermere. It was found to be unsatisfactory and not flown.
Improved Type I. One machine built
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary, later replaced by a 100hp Anzani ten-cylinder air-cooled radial when converted to Land/Seaplane. The only machine built was a two-seater shown at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1914. It was commandeered in September 1914 but, being of no military value, was returned to the makers. It was then sold to W.R. Ding of the Northern Aircraft Co. in 1915 as the Land/Sea monoplane. It was first flown on floats on 26 October 1915 at Bowness-on-Windermere, where it was used as a trainer until written off on 1 April 1916.
Data
Span 38ft
Chord 6ft 8in
Area 252 sq ft
Length 28ft 6in
Seaplane length 29ft 6in
Weight (Type I) 950 lb
Allup(Type I) 1,500 lb
Weight (Land/Sea) 1,124 lb
Allup (Land/Sea) 1,733 1b
The first Blackburn Type I two-seater monoplane of 1913 ready for one of its early flights, with M. G. Christie and Harold Blackburn aboard and showing the original engine cowling.
Sydney Pickles with the Improved Type I at West Auckland on 11 July 1914. This view shows the twin tail skid and narrow-chord tailplane.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLACKBURN Type L seaplane
After preparing a seaplane project in 1913, Blackburn proceeded with the design of a large 'hydrobiplane' for entry in the 1914 Seaplane Circuit of Britain. This was Blackburn's first biplane and the first to be built at the Olympia Works. When the contest was abandoned the Type L was commandeered by the Admiralty and moved in August to Scalby Mills, where it was tested and flown by freelance pilot Sydney Pickles. It was operated for a period on coastal reconnaissance, armed with a machine gun. Early in 1915 the machine crashed into a cliff at Speeton in poor visibility, when being flown by Rowland Ding from Scarborough to Killingholme.
The Type L was a conventional biplane design of the period, although it was the first Blackburn machine with a square-section fuselage. During the course of its development, the longspan, parallel ailerons on the top wing were replaced by shortspan, tapered units. Other changes included the removal of the engine cowling and the moving of the radiators to the rear center section struts.
A proposed larger development of the Type L was not proceeded with.
Power: 130hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) nine-cylinder water-cooled radial.
Data
Span top 49ft 6in
Span bottom 35ft
Chord. 6ft
Area 481 sq ft
Length 32ft 6in
Height 12ft 6in
Weight 1,717lb
Weight allup 2,475lb
Max speed 85 mph
Ceiling 11,000 ft
Range 445 miles
1913 Project.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder rotary or 100hp Anzani ten-cylinder both air cooled.
Data
Span top 44ft.
Span bottom 36ft
Chord 5ft
Area 410 sq ft
Length 33 ft
Weight. 1,250lb
Max speed estimated 65 mph
1914 Project.
Power: 200hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span top 62ft
Span bottom 47ft 6in
Weight 1,450lb
Weight allup 3,000lb
After preparing a seaplane project in 1913, Blackburn proceeded with the design of a large 'hydrobiplane' for entry in the 1914 Seaplane Circuit of Britain. This was Blackburn's first biplane and the first to be built at the Olympia Works. When the contest was abandoned the Type L was commandeered by the Admiralty and moved in August to Scalby Mills, where it was tested and flown by freelance pilot Sydney Pickles. It was operated for a period on coastal reconnaissance, armed with a machine gun. Early in 1915 the machine crashed into a cliff at Speeton in poor visibility, when being flown by Rowland Ding from Scarborough to Killingholme.
The Type L was a conventional biplane design of the period, although it was the first Blackburn machine with a square-section fuselage. During the course of its development, the longspan, parallel ailerons on the top wing were replaced by shortspan, tapered units. Other changes included the removal of the engine cowling and the moving of the radiators to the rear center section struts.
A proposed larger development of the Type L was not proceeded with.
Power: 130hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) nine-cylinder water-cooled radial.
Data
Span top 49ft 6in
Span bottom 35ft
Chord. 6ft
Area 481 sq ft
Length 32ft 6in
Height 12ft 6in
Weight 1,717lb
Weight allup 2,475lb
Max speed 85 mph
Ceiling 11,000 ft
Range 445 miles
1913 Project.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder rotary or 100hp Anzani ten-cylinder both air cooled.
Data
Span top 44ft.
Span bottom 36ft
Chord 5ft
Area 410 sq ft
Length 33 ft
Weight. 1,250lb
Max speed estimated 65 mph
1914 Project.
Power: 200hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span top 62ft
Span bottom 47ft 6in
Weight 1,450lb
Weight allup 3,000lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLACKPOOL & FYLDE AERO CLUB glider (Sec. Jack Kemp)
Under construction in February 1910.
Under construction in February 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BLAND Mayfly biplane (Miss Lilian E. Bland, Carmoney, Belfast, N. Ireland assisted by S. Girvany of Ballymore)
This machine was built as a glider and tested as a kite and in free flight in early 1910. Various changes were made as a result of these tests before the conversion to power was made. Miss Bland sent a series of letters to 'Flight" and reported that the aeroplane was flown under power by September 1910. She later described in detail the construction of the machine in 'Flight of 17 December 1910 (p. 102-157).
MAYFLY glider
Data
Span 27ft 6in
Chord 5ft
Area 200 sq. ft
Weight 2001b
MAYFLY biplane
The final version was a pusher biplane with open braced booms front and rear, mounted on a tricycle subframe with skids. Unbalanced ailerons were fitted just below the top wing and the front elevators were also capable of being operated differentially. Rear elevators and a small fixed tailplane were employed. For ease of transport the booms were removed and the subframe turned through 90 degrees.
By March 1911 Miss Bland was flying a scale model of a proposed 30ft span Mayfly 2 which was not built, for she married later and disposed of the dismantled aircraft at the end of the year. The engine was bought by the Windsor Model and Gliding Club.
Power: 20hp Avro (Edwards) two-cylinder horizontally opposed air-cooled two-stroke driving a 6ft 6in diameter Avro propeller.
Data
Span 27ft 7in
Chord 5ft
Area 250 sq ft
Length 23 ft
Height 9ft 10in
This machine was built as a glider and tested as a kite and in free flight in early 1910. Various changes were made as a result of these tests before the conversion to power was made. Miss Bland sent a series of letters to 'Flight" and reported that the aeroplane was flown under power by September 1910. She later described in detail the construction of the machine in 'Flight of 17 December 1910 (p. 102-157).
MAYFLY glider
Data
Span 27ft 6in
Chord 5ft
Area 200 sq. ft
Weight 2001b
MAYFLY biplane
The final version was a pusher biplane with open braced booms front and rear, mounted on a tricycle subframe with skids. Unbalanced ailerons were fitted just below the top wing and the front elevators were also capable of being operated differentially. Rear elevators and a small fixed tailplane were employed. For ease of transport the booms were removed and the subframe turned through 90 degrees.
By March 1911 Miss Bland was flying a scale model of a proposed 30ft span Mayfly 2 which was not built, for she married later and disposed of the dismantled aircraft at the end of the year. The engine was bought by the Windsor Model and Gliding Club.
Power: 20hp Avro (Edwards) two-cylinder horizontally opposed air-cooled two-stroke driving a 6ft 6in diameter Avro propeller.
Data
Span 27ft 7in
Chord 5ft
Area 250 sq ft
Length 23 ft
Height 9ft 10in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BONNARD biplane (L.H. Bonnard, International Aero Co., Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire)
This small single-seat pusher biplane was built on Farman lines except for the position of the ailerons, which were hinged to the front outboard interplane struts. At the time the machine was described and illustrated in 'The Aero ' on 28 December 1910 (p.506) no engine was fitted.
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 4ft 3in
Area 221 sq ft
Tailplane 28 sq ft
Elevators 17 sq ft each
This small single-seat pusher biplane was built on Farman lines except for the position of the ailerons, which were hinged to the front outboard interplane struts. At the time the machine was described and illustrated in 'The Aero ' on 28 December 1910 (p.506) no engine was fitted.
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 4ft 3in
Area 221 sq ft
Tailplane 28 sq ft
Elevators 17 sq ft each
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BOULTBEE monoplane (Harold E. Boultbee, Holy Trinity Vicarage, Burton-on-Trent and James Gardiner, Woolton, Liverpool)
This was a single-seater, midwing monoplane, with a fuselage constructed of steel tubing. The longerons curved down to the nose, where a bearing supported the propeller shaft. The rotary engine was set back in the fuselage, where it was mounted on a cruciform frame carried on the four longerons. The wing was constructed of wood and warping was used for lateral control. The control system was covered by patent No. 14990/1909. The under-carriage, fitted with long coil springs, was raked well forward as a precaution, owing to uncertainty about the fore and aft balance. It was to be retractable in flight and was covered by patent No. 17291/1909. A tall strut with tail wheel was fitted.
The partners separated and work on the machine was stopped at an advanced stage. Boultbee later held various senior design positions at Bristol and Handley Page and for a time, between the wars, had his own company, the Civilian Aircraft Co.
Power: 12hp Scott two-cylinder horizontally-opposed rotary driving a 6ft Hollands two-bladed steel propeller.
Data
Span 36ft
This was a single-seater, midwing monoplane, with a fuselage constructed of steel tubing. The longerons curved down to the nose, where a bearing supported the propeller shaft. The rotary engine was set back in the fuselage, where it was mounted on a cruciform frame carried on the four longerons. The wing was constructed of wood and warping was used for lateral control. The control system was covered by patent No. 14990/1909. The under-carriage, fitted with long coil springs, was raked well forward as a precaution, owing to uncertainty about the fore and aft balance. It was to be retractable in flight and was covered by patent No. 17291/1909. A tall strut with tail wheel was fitted.
The partners separated and work on the machine was stopped at an advanced stage. Boultbee later held various senior design positions at Bristol and Handley Page and for a time, between the wars, had his own company, the Civilian Aircraft Co.
Power: 12hp Scott two-cylinder horizontally-opposed rotary driving a 6ft Hollands two-bladed steel propeller.
Data
Span 36ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BOUSTEAD glider (Cedric Boustead, Wimbledon Park, London)
The machine was a biplane with curved lower wing brought up to join the tips of the upper wing. It was a canard controlled by the front elevator. The main structure was of ash with a bamboo elevator. It was flown briefly but successfully at Wimbledon Park.
Data
Span 22ft 6in
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 285 sq ft
Span of elevators 13ft
Weight 150lb
The machine was a biplane with curved lower wing brought up to join the tips of the upper wing. It was a canard controlled by the front elevator. The main structure was of ash with a bamboo elevator. It was flown briefly but successfully at Wimbledon Park.
Data
Span 22ft 6in
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 285 sq ft
Span of elevators 13ft
Weight 150lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRAGG-SMITH biplane (G.P. Bragg-Smith, Mitcham, Surrey)
Bragg-Smith, a model maker, began construction of a full size canard biplane in 1911, but it was not completed. The machine was shown in model form at Olympia in April 1911 and won first prize for workmanship at the display organized by the RAeC, the AA and the Motor Union.
Bragg-Smith, a model maker, began construction of a full size canard biplane in 1911, but it was not completed. The machine was shown in model form at Olympia in April 1911 and won first prize for workmanship at the display organized by the RAeC, the AA and the Motor Union.
Bragg-Smith model of automatic stability biplane. The fullsize machine was started at Brooklands in 1911 but was not completed.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BREAREY glider (F.W. Brearey)
The real founder of the Aeronautical Society in 1866 was Fred Brearey, who was to be its Hon. Secretary for its first thirty years. When the first enthusiasm in the Society started to flag it was Brearey who kept it alive until his death in 1896; by then there had been a great revival of interest in aviation matters.
Brearey was an ardent advocate of heavier-than-air flight and designed at least one glider. This was an elegant-looking machine, with birdlike wings and tail. It is not known if it was ever built.
In 1879 Brearey filed a patent (No.2376) for a flying machine described as 'an elongated body pointed at both ends contains the requisite machinery and the passengers. Flexible lever arms extend on either side, and a flexible spar extends from the tail end of the body. Silk or other suitable fabric is extended from the arms and along the spar of the tail, thus giving a large supporting surface, and vibrations are imparted to the area which propels the machine by a wave like motion'.
The real founder of the Aeronautical Society in 1866 was Fred Brearey, who was to be its Hon. Secretary for its first thirty years. When the first enthusiasm in the Society started to flag it was Brearey who kept it alive until his death in 1896; by then there had been a great revival of interest in aviation matters.
Brearey was an ardent advocate of heavier-than-air flight and designed at least one glider. This was an elegant-looking machine, with birdlike wings and tail. It is not known if it was ever built.
In 1879 Brearey filed a patent (No.2376) for a flying machine described as 'an elongated body pointed at both ends contains the requisite machinery and the passengers. Flexible lever arms extend on either side, and a flexible spar extends from the tail end of the body. Silk or other suitable fabric is extended from the arms and along the spar of the tail, thus giving a large supporting surface, and vibrations are imparted to the area which propels the machine by a wave like motion'.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL AIRCRAFT (British & Colonial Aeroplane Co. Ltd., Clare St., Filton, Bristol
The company was established at Filton early in 1910 and later that year acquired sheds at Brooklands and Larkhill for test flying and training schools. In order to establish itself as a manufacturer the company obtained a license from the Societe Zodiac of Paris for its biplane, an example of which it was arranged to exhibit at the Olympia Aero Show in March, together with a monoplane, which did not arrive. The biplane was not a success, and thereafter the company produced its own designs, the first of which became well known as the Boxkite. It was similar to a Farman and was most successful. The future of the enterprise was assured, and it expanded to produce a succession of types, making the company the largest producer of aircraft in the country in the early years of the industry.
The Flying Schools at Brooklands and Larkhill were equally successful and were responsible for training the highest number of pilots of any such establishment between 1910-1914.
BRISTOL BOXKITE biplane
Bristol took the easy way to establish itself, after the failure of the Zodiac, by copying, with some improvements in both design and workmanship, the Farman pusher biplane. The engineer was G.H. Challenger.
The prototype was unable to fly with the Gregoire water-cooled engine at first fitted. This was replaced by a 50hp Gnome and when taken to Larkhill flew extremely well on 29 July 1910. Gnome engines, some of increased power, were mainly fitted to the subsequent aircraft, which reached a total of seventy-six when production was completed in 1915. Of this number, twenty-two were exported to nine different countries.
The Boxkite was basically a two-seater largely employed for pilot training at the Bristol Schools and elsewhere. Apart from the use of various engines, other differences of note on individual machines were the use of three rudders, protection for the crew and double surfaced wings. Upper wing extensions were fitted to the 'Military' type.
Two special single-seat racing machines were also constructed; the first was No.44 flown on 30 May 1911 for M. Tetard to fly in the Circuit de l'Europe (Racing No.3) in which it failed to finish due to engine trouble. This machine had single bay wings with upper wing extensions and a nacelle. The second was a redesign by Gabriel Voisin, with reduced gap and front booms and elevator removed and with single rudder and tailplane. It was at Larkhill in February 1912 in this form, but was rebuilt as a standard school biplane.
Power:
40/50hp Gregoire four-cylinder inline water-cooled initially in prototype (No.7)
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee (two aircraft only Nos.8 and 16)
60hp Renault seven-cylinder water-cooled vee (one aircraft only No.39)
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary, (six aircraft Nos.31, 32, 42, 60, 79 and 139)
Data Standard Type
Span 34ft 6in
Area 457 sq ft
Length 38ft 6in
Height 11ft 10in
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,050lb
Speed 40 mph
Production 15
Data Racing Type No.69
Span 32ft 8in
Area 420 sq ft
Length 30ft 9in
Height 9ft 6in
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,000lb
Speed 50 mph
Production 1
The company was established at Filton early in 1910 and later that year acquired sheds at Brooklands and Larkhill for test flying and training schools. In order to establish itself as a manufacturer the company obtained a license from the Societe Zodiac of Paris for its biplane, an example of which it was arranged to exhibit at the Olympia Aero Show in March, together with a monoplane, which did not arrive. The biplane was not a success, and thereafter the company produced its own designs, the first of which became well known as the Boxkite. It was similar to a Farman and was most successful. The future of the enterprise was assured, and it expanded to produce a succession of types, making the company the largest producer of aircraft in the country in the early years of the industry.
The Flying Schools at Brooklands and Larkhill were equally successful and were responsible for training the highest number of pilots of any such establishment between 1910-1914.
BRISTOL BOXKITE biplane
Bristol took the easy way to establish itself, after the failure of the Zodiac, by copying, with some improvements in both design and workmanship, the Farman pusher biplane. The engineer was G.H. Challenger.
The prototype was unable to fly with the Gregoire water-cooled engine at first fitted. This was replaced by a 50hp Gnome and when taken to Larkhill flew extremely well on 29 July 1910. Gnome engines, some of increased power, were mainly fitted to the subsequent aircraft, which reached a total of seventy-six when production was completed in 1915. Of this number, twenty-two were exported to nine different countries.
The Boxkite was basically a two-seater largely employed for pilot training at the Bristol Schools and elsewhere. Apart from the use of various engines, other differences of note on individual machines were the use of three rudders, protection for the crew and double surfaced wings. Upper wing extensions were fitted to the 'Military' type.
Two special single-seat racing machines were also constructed; the first was No.44 flown on 30 May 1911 for M. Tetard to fly in the Circuit de l'Europe (Racing No.3) in which it failed to finish due to engine trouble. This machine had single bay wings with upper wing extensions and a nacelle. The second was a redesign by Gabriel Voisin, with reduced gap and front booms and elevator removed and with single rudder and tailplane. It was at Larkhill in February 1912 in this form, but was rebuilt as a standard school biplane.
Power:
40/50hp Gregoire four-cylinder inline water-cooled initially in prototype (No.7)
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee (two aircraft only Nos.8 and 16)
60hp Renault seven-cylinder water-cooled vee (one aircraft only No.39)
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary, (six aircraft Nos.31, 32, 42, 60, 79 and 139)
Data Standard Type
Span 34ft 6in
Area 457 sq ft
Length 38ft 6in
Height 11ft 10in
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,050lb
Speed 40 mph
Production 15
Data Racing Type No.69
Span 32ft 8in
Area 420 sq ft
Length 30ft 9in
Height 9ft 6in
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,000lb
Speed 50 mph
Production 1
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL glider
This biplane glider was designed by Challenger for Sir George White to present to the Bristol and West of England Aero Club, of which he was President. It was similar to the Boxkite in layout, and designed to carry two people and was later to be fitted with a 30hp engine, which was never installed. It was flown for the first time on 17 December 1910 by Challenger at Keynsham, Somerset, and continued in use until 1912, the inevitable damage being repaired from time to time by the company.
Data
Span 32ft 4in
Length 33ft 10in
Height 6ft 8in
This biplane glider was designed by Challenger for Sir George White to present to the Bristol and West of England Aero Club, of which he was President. It was similar to the Boxkite in layout, and designed to carry two people and was later to be fitted with a 30hp engine, which was never installed. It was flown for the first time on 17 December 1910 by Challenger at Keynsham, Somerset, and continued in use until 1912, the inevitable damage being repaired from time to time by the company.
Data
Span 32ft 4in
Length 33ft 10in
Height 6ft 8in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL Racing biplane. (Challenger-Grandseigne 1911)
This single-seater, unequal span biplane was designed by Frenchmen, M.M. Grandseigne and Versepuy, under the supervision of G.H. Challenger and first appeared at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911. It was wrecked on its first attempt to fly at Larkhill in April.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 27ft
Area 210sqft
Length 25ft
one aircraft built, works no. 33.
This single-seater, unequal span biplane was designed by Frenchmen, M.M. Grandseigne and Versepuy, under the supervision of G.H. Challenger and first appeared at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911. It was wrecked on its first attempt to fly at Larkhill in April.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 27ft
Area 210sqft
Length 25ft
one aircraft built, works no. 33.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL VOISIN monoplane
The only record of this machine, which was designed and partly built by Voisin Freres, was an illustration and brief details in Flight of 19 August 1911 (p.727). It had been hoped to acquire a Zodiac monoplane for exhibition in March 1910 and although the report is much later, this may have been the machine, since Voisin had already been engaged as a consultant to work for Bristol. This machine is seldom featured in published records of Bristol aircraft.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 36ft lin
Area 215 sq ft
Length 26ft 3in
Weight 882 lb
The only record of this machine, which was designed and partly built by Voisin Freres, was an illustration and brief details in Flight of 19 August 1911 (p.727). It had been hoped to acquire a Zodiac monoplane for exhibition in March 1910 and although the report is much later, this may have been the machine, since Voisin had already been engaged as a consultant to work for Bristol. This machine is seldom featured in published records of Bristol aircraft.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 36ft lin
Area 215 sq ft
Length 26ft 3in
Weight 882 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL BOXKITE biplane
Bristol took the easy way to establish itself, after the failure of the Zodiac, by copying, with some improvements in both design and workmanship, the Farman pusher biplane. The engineer was G.H. Challenger.
The prototype was unable to fly with the Gregoire water-cooled engine at first fitted. This was replaced by a 50hp Gnome and when taken to Larkhill flew extremely well on 29 July 1910. Gnome engines, some of increased power, were mainly fitted to the subsequent aircraft, which reached a total of seventy-six when production was completed in 1915. Of this number, twenty-two were exported to nine different countries.
The Boxkite was basically a two-seater largely employed for pilot training at the Bristol Schools and elsewhere. Apart from the use of various engines, other differences of note on individual machines were the use of three rudders, protection for the crew and double surfaced wings. Upper wing extensions were fitted to the 'Military' type.
Two special single-seat racing machines were also constructed; the first was No.44 flown on 30 May 1911 for M. Tetard to fly in the Circuit de l'Europe (Racing No.3) in which it failed to finish due to engine trouble. This machine had single bay wings with upper wing extensions and a nacelle. The second was a redesign by Gabriel Voisin, with reduced gap and front booms and elevator removed and with single rudder and tailplane. It was at Larkhill in February 1912 in this form, but was rebuilt as a standard school biplane.
Power:
40/50hp Gregoire four-cylinder inline water-cooled initially in prototype (No.7)
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee (two aircraft only Nos.8 and 16)
60hp Renault seven-cylinder water-cooled vee (one aircraft only No.39)
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary, (six aircraft Nos.31, 32, 42, 60, 79 and 139)
Data Military Type
Span 47ft 8in or 46ft 6in
Area 517sqft
Length 38ft 6in
Height 11ft 10in
Weight 900 lb
Weight allup 1,150lb
Speed 40 mph
Production 61
Data Racing Type No.44
Span 35ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 38ft
Height 11ft 10in
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,000lb
Speed 50 mph
Production 1
Bristol took the easy way to establish itself, after the failure of the Zodiac, by copying, with some improvements in both design and workmanship, the Farman pusher biplane. The engineer was G.H. Challenger.
The prototype was unable to fly with the Gregoire water-cooled engine at first fitted. This was replaced by a 50hp Gnome and when taken to Larkhill flew extremely well on 29 July 1910. Gnome engines, some of increased power, were mainly fitted to the subsequent aircraft, which reached a total of seventy-six when production was completed in 1915. Of this number, twenty-two were exported to nine different countries.
The Boxkite was basically a two-seater largely employed for pilot training at the Bristol Schools and elsewhere. Apart from the use of various engines, other differences of note on individual machines were the use of three rudders, protection for the crew and double surfaced wings. Upper wing extensions were fitted to the 'Military' type.
Two special single-seat racing machines were also constructed; the first was No.44 flown on 30 May 1911 for M. Tetard to fly in the Circuit de l'Europe (Racing No.3) in which it failed to finish due to engine trouble. This machine had single bay wings with upper wing extensions and a nacelle. The second was a redesign by Gabriel Voisin, with reduced gap and front booms and elevator removed and with single rudder and tailplane. It was at Larkhill in February 1912 in this form, but was rebuilt as a standard school biplane.
Power:
40/50hp Gregoire four-cylinder inline water-cooled initially in prototype (No.7)
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee (two aircraft only Nos.8 and 16)
60hp Renault seven-cylinder water-cooled vee (one aircraft only No.39)
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary, (six aircraft Nos.31, 32, 42, 60, 79 and 139)
Data Military Type
Span 47ft 8in or 46ft 6in
Area 517sqft
Length 38ft 6in
Height 11ft 10in
Weight 900 lb
Weight allup 1,150lb
Speed 40 mph
Production 61
Data Racing Type No.44
Span 35ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 38ft
Height 11ft 10in
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,000lb
Speed 50 mph
Production 1
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL monoplane. (Challenger-Low 1911)
This single-seater was the first monoplane designed at Bristol, and two were built, the first arriving at Larkhill in February 1911. The tests were curtailed to return the machine to Filton to prepare it for exhibition at Olympia in March. The second machine was shown at St. Petersburg, Russia in April. The type was abandoned after unsuccessful attempts to fly at Larkhill by Versepuy. The machine had a triangular-section fuselage and warping wings.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 33ft 6in
Length 31ft 6in
Area 215 sq ft
Weight 580 lb
Weight allup 760lb
Speed estimated 55 mph
Two aircraft built works Nos.35 and 36.
This single-seater was the first monoplane designed at Bristol, and two were built, the first arriving at Larkhill in February 1911. The tests were curtailed to return the machine to Filton to prepare it for exhibition at Olympia in March. The second machine was shown at St. Petersburg, Russia in April. The type was abandoned after unsuccessful attempts to fly at Larkhill by Versepuy. The machine had a triangular-section fuselage and warping wings.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 33ft 6in
Length 31ft 6in
Area 215 sq ft
Weight 580 lb
Weight allup 760lb
Speed estimated 55 mph
Two aircraft built works Nos.35 and 36.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL monoplanes. (Type Prier PI, Prier-Dickson and Prier-Coanda)
Following the earlier unsuccessful monoplane design, the company engaged Pierre Prier, chief instructor at the Bleriot School at Hendon and a capable engineer, to prepare the next monoplane design. The first PI, Works No.46, was not ready for the Gordon Bennett Cup Race on 1 July 1911 but flew soon after. The second and third Nos.56, 57 intended for the Circuit of Britain Contest later that month, also failed to start, No.56 being crashed by Prier before the race and No.57 having a pilot problem.
Thereafter production of both single-seater and two-seaters of five versions proceeded to a total of thirty-four aircraft, when production terminated in December 1912, with two major rebuilds recorded in addition. Of the total, fourteen were exported including those used at the Bristol schools in Germany and Italy. Only two aircraft were bought by the British government owing to the ban on the use of monoplanes by the military.
The original machine had a front mounting to the rotary engine, which was not used on subsequent aircraft. All types had warping wings and sprung undercarriage skids, but a fixed tailplane and hinged elevators were introduced and the fuselage lengthened by 2ft 6in for the majority of machines from No.82 onwards, when the type became known as the Prier-Dickson because of the latter's involvement.
After Prier left the company Henri Coanda designed a side-by-side two-seater, of which three were built.
Power:
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Three PI aircraft Nos.46, 56 and 57. Eleven short fuselage two-seaters Nos.58, 71-76, 83, 84, 90 and 94.
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Ten long fuselage two-seaters and three side-by-side Nos.82, 85, 89 and 107-109.
35hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan type radial. Seven single-seaters Nos.68, 81, 95-98 and 102
40hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial. Replacement for 50hp Gnome. One single-seater No.56.
Data PI single-seater
Span 30ft 2in
Area 166 sq ft
Length 24ft 6in
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 640 lb
Weight allup 820lb
Speed 68 mph
Data School single-seater
Span 30ft 2in
Area 166 sq ft
Length 24ft 6in
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 620 lb
Weight allup 780lb
Speed 58 mph
Data Short fuselage two-seater
Span 32ft 9in
Area 185 sq ft
Length 24ft 6in
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 650 lb
Weight allup 1,000lb
Speed 65 mph
Data Long fuselage two-seater
Span 34ft
Area 200 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 660 lb
Weight allup 1,080lb
Speed 65 mph
Data Side-by-side two-seater
Span 35ft 6in
Area 200 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 660 lb
Weight allup 1,080lb
Speed 65 mph
Following the earlier unsuccessful monoplane design, the company engaged Pierre Prier, chief instructor at the Bleriot School at Hendon and a capable engineer, to prepare the next monoplane design. The first PI, Works No.46, was not ready for the Gordon Bennett Cup Race on 1 July 1911 but flew soon after. The second and third Nos.56, 57 intended for the Circuit of Britain Contest later that month, also failed to start, No.56 being crashed by Prier before the race and No.57 having a pilot problem.
Thereafter production of both single-seater and two-seaters of five versions proceeded to a total of thirty-four aircraft, when production terminated in December 1912, with two major rebuilds recorded in addition. Of the total, fourteen were exported including those used at the Bristol schools in Germany and Italy. Only two aircraft were bought by the British government owing to the ban on the use of monoplanes by the military.
The original machine had a front mounting to the rotary engine, which was not used on subsequent aircraft. All types had warping wings and sprung undercarriage skids, but a fixed tailplane and hinged elevators were introduced and the fuselage lengthened by 2ft 6in for the majority of machines from No.82 onwards, when the type became known as the Prier-Dickson because of the latter's involvement.
After Prier left the company Henri Coanda designed a side-by-side two-seater, of which three were built.
Power:
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Three PI aircraft Nos.46, 56 and 57. Eleven short fuselage two-seaters Nos.58, 71-76, 83, 84, 90 and 94.
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Ten long fuselage two-seaters and three side-by-side Nos.82, 85, 89 and 107-109.
35hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan type radial. Seven single-seaters Nos.68, 81, 95-98 and 102
40hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial. Replacement for 50hp Gnome. One single-seater No.56.
Data PI single-seater
Span 30ft 2in
Area 166 sq ft
Length 24ft 6in
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 640 lb
Weight allup 820lb
Speed 68 mph
Data School single-seater
Span 30ft 2in
Area 166 sq ft
Length 24ft 6in
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 620 lb
Weight allup 780lb
Speed 58 mph
Data Short fuselage two-seater
Span 32ft 9in
Area 185 sq ft
Length 24ft 6in
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 650 lb
Weight allup 1,000lb
Speed 65 mph
Data Long fuselage two-seater
Span 34ft
Area 200 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 660 lb
Weight allup 1,080lb
Speed 65 mph
Data Side-by-side two-seater
Span 35ft 6in
Area 200 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 9ft 9in
Weight 660 lb
Weight allup 1,080lb
Speed 65 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL biplane Type T. (Challenger-Dickson)
This single-seat racing biplane was a new design based on the Boxkite experience and recommendations by Capt. Dickson. Five of the type were built and a sixth partly finished.
The first, Works No.45, was flown by Tabuteau in the Circuit de l'Europe in June-July 1911, in which he finished ninth. Works Nos.51,54 were built for a team to compete in the Daily Mail Circuit of Britain Contest held in July 1911, but none achieved success in this.
The first four machines had 70hp Gnomes, but No.54 was fitted with a 60hp Renault; No.78, the last machine, was not completed, but would have had a 100hp Gnome; No.51 was sold to a private owner and was fitted with a 50hp Gnome, but was soon involved in a fatal crash. One of the remaining machines was converted to become the Challenger-England biplane No.59 (q.v.).
The first machine had twin rudders set close together, but on the later machines the rudders were moved into line with the booms. Other changes were made to the nacelle and flying controls.
Power:
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Works Nos.45, 51,53.
60hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee. Works No.54.
100hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Works No.78 not completed.
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Fitted before sale in No.51.
Data
Span 35ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 24ft 6in
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,000lb
Speed 58 mph
Five aircraft built, one aircraft partly built.
BRISTOL biplane. (Challenger-England)
This was the conversion to tractor configuration of one of the Type T pushers. The work was mainly done by Gordon England, a pilot with no formal design qualifications but with a good practical background.
The front booms and elevator were discarded and a new single-seater nacelle was built on the lower wing. A single rudder, centrally mounted tailplane and divided elevator replaced the originals.
The machine flew from Larkhill in November 1911 and, although not very successful, was flown at intervals by advanced pupils until 19May 1912, when it was taxied into spectators, one of whom was killed. The machine was then dismantled.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 35ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 23ft
This single-seat racing biplane was a new design based on the Boxkite experience and recommendations by Capt. Dickson. Five of the type were built and a sixth partly finished.
The first, Works No.45, was flown by Tabuteau in the Circuit de l'Europe in June-July 1911, in which he finished ninth. Works Nos.51,54 were built for a team to compete in the Daily Mail Circuit of Britain Contest held in July 1911, but none achieved success in this.
The first four machines had 70hp Gnomes, but No.54 was fitted with a 60hp Renault; No.78, the last machine, was not completed, but would have had a 100hp Gnome; No.51 was sold to a private owner and was fitted with a 50hp Gnome, but was soon involved in a fatal crash. One of the remaining machines was converted to become the Challenger-England biplane No.59 (q.v.).
The first machine had twin rudders set close together, but on the later machines the rudders were moved into line with the booms. Other changes were made to the nacelle and flying controls.
Power:
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Works Nos.45, 51,53.
60hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee. Works No.54.
100hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Works No.78 not completed.
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Fitted before sale in No.51.
Data
Span 35ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 24ft 6in
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,000lb
Speed 58 mph
Five aircraft built, one aircraft partly built.
BRISTOL biplane. (Challenger-England)
This was the conversion to tractor configuration of one of the Type T pushers. The work was mainly done by Gordon England, a pilot with no formal design qualifications but with a good practical background.
The front booms and elevator were discarded and a new single-seater nacelle was built on the lower wing. A single rudder, centrally mounted tailplane and divided elevator replaced the originals.
The machine flew from Larkhill in November 1911 and, although not very successful, was flown at intervals by advanced pupils until 19May 1912, when it was taxied into spectators, one of whom was killed. The machine was then dismantled.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 35ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 23ft
Collyns Pizey on Bristol-Challenger-Dickson Type T No.52 at Larkhill, June 1911. One of a batch of racing biplanes based on the Boxkite.
The Bristol Challenger-England Biplane No.59 (a conversion of a Type T to tractor type) on it back at Larkhill after running into a crowd on 19th May, 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL BURNEY hydroplanes
A series of three of these machines with buoyant hulls, buoyancy bags in the first case, and hydrofoils on legs for lifting the machine from the water, were built. The original biplane suggested by Lt. Burney RN was not constructed, as Barnwell had reservations and he proposed a larger monoplane, two versions of which were both built and tested. The design required the use of both air and water propellers.
BRISTOL BURNEY X.1 biplane
This was to be a two-seater biplane based on the GE.1 design, to which it was proposed to add five flotation bags below the wings and fuselage. Three hydroped legs carrying hydrofoils were immersed when the machine was at rest and two of these carried underwater propellers, driven from the single engine. The transfer of power from water to air propeller was effected by engaging and disengaging clutches on a countershaft mounted between the cylinder banks. The X.l was not built.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 34ft
Area 325 sq ft
Length 30ft
BRISTOL BURNEY X.2 monoplane
This second design was built as a flying boat with a planked and sealed hull. It was a side-by-side two-seater monoplane with dual controls and wing warping for lateral control. A similar layout to that of the X.l, was used, with three hydropeds and hydrofoils and water propellers on the two front legs.
Trials were carried out at Dale in May 1912, but damage to the hydrofoils occurred during taxiing before the airscrew could be engaged. During later tests with both air and water propellers engaged the engine proved to be insufficiently powerful. On 21 September 1912, during towing tests with engine removed and equivalent ballast, the aircraft rose and sideslipped into the water and the resulting damage was not repaired.
Power: 80hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) seven-cylinder water-cooled radial.
Data
Span 55ft 9in
Area 480 sq ft
Length 30ft 8in
One aircraft built Works No.92.
BRISTOL BURNEY X.3 monoplane
A larger replacement for the X.2 was begun in May 1913. The hull framework was made at Filton, but was made lighter by being covered with 'Consuta' wire-sewn plywood, this work being carried out by SE Saunders Ltd. at Cowes. The lateral control was by ailerons. In addition to the hydrofoil legs a central mounting for contra-rotating water propellers was adopted to cancel out torque reaction and improve stability.
Initial trials in 1913 were carried out with an 80hp Gnome engine installed and with the wings replaced by a temporary structure with floats at the tips. The main hydropeds were fitted with both water rudders and elevators. An elevator just behind the airscrew was operated in conjunction with the clutch, when the airscrew was engaged.
The final aircraft was ready for testing by Harry Busteed in June 1914, but it grounded on a sandbank and was damaged. Further work was not approved and the machine was stored until 1920, when it was scrapped. One aircraft built Works No. 159.
Power: 200hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) 2.M.7 fourteen-cylinder water-cooled radial.
Data
Span 57ft 10in
Area 500 sq ft
Length 36ft 8in
A series of three of these machines with buoyant hulls, buoyancy bags in the first case, and hydrofoils on legs for lifting the machine from the water, were built. The original biplane suggested by Lt. Burney RN was not constructed, as Barnwell had reservations and he proposed a larger monoplane, two versions of which were both built and tested. The design required the use of both air and water propellers.
BRISTOL BURNEY X.1 biplane
This was to be a two-seater biplane based on the GE.1 design, to which it was proposed to add five flotation bags below the wings and fuselage. Three hydroped legs carrying hydrofoils were immersed when the machine was at rest and two of these carried underwater propellers, driven from the single engine. The transfer of power from water to air propeller was effected by engaging and disengaging clutches on a countershaft mounted between the cylinder banks. The X.l was not built.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 34ft
Area 325 sq ft
Length 30ft
BRISTOL BURNEY X.2 monoplane
This second design was built as a flying boat with a planked and sealed hull. It was a side-by-side two-seater monoplane with dual controls and wing warping for lateral control. A similar layout to that of the X.l, was used, with three hydropeds and hydrofoils and water propellers on the two front legs.
Trials were carried out at Dale in May 1912, but damage to the hydrofoils occurred during taxiing before the airscrew could be engaged. During later tests with both air and water propellers engaged the engine proved to be insufficiently powerful. On 21 September 1912, during towing tests with engine removed and equivalent ballast, the aircraft rose and sideslipped into the water and the resulting damage was not repaired.
Power: 80hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) seven-cylinder water-cooled radial.
Data
Span 55ft 9in
Area 480 sq ft
Length 30ft 8in
One aircraft built Works No.92.
BRISTOL BURNEY X.3 monoplane
A larger replacement for the X.2 was begun in May 1913. The hull framework was made at Filton, but was made lighter by being covered with 'Consuta' wire-sewn plywood, this work being carried out by SE Saunders Ltd. at Cowes. The lateral control was by ailerons. In addition to the hydrofoil legs a central mounting for contra-rotating water propellers was adopted to cancel out torque reaction and improve stability.
Initial trials in 1913 were carried out with an 80hp Gnome engine installed and with the wings replaced by a temporary structure with floats at the tips. The main hydropeds were fitted with both water rudders and elevators. An elevator just behind the airscrew was operated in conjunction with the clutch, when the airscrew was engaged.
The final aircraft was ready for testing by Harry Busteed in June 1914, but it grounded on a sandbank and was damaged. Further work was not approved and the machine was stored until 1920, when it was scrapped. One aircraft built Works No. 159.
Power: 200hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) 2.M.7 fourteen-cylinder water-cooled radial.
Data
Span 57ft 10in
Area 500 sq ft
Length 36ft 8in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL COANDA monoplanes. (Henri Coanda)
After working in France, Henri Coanda, son of the Rumanian War Minister, began work as a designer at Bristol in January 1912. After carrying out some redesign of the Prier-Dickson monoplanes, he followed with a tandem two-seater of similar type. The prototype, Works No.77 went to Larkhill for testing in March 1912 and was followed by a batch of five more for Italy and Rumania. In March a side-by-side version, Works No.80 was flown followed by a further six, of which Italy purchased two and Rumania three.
Two of a variant for the British Military Trials were produced later in the year, Works Nos. 105-106 and both were entered. After achieving joint third place, both were bought by the War Office for operation by the RFC as serial Nos.263 and 262 respectively. The former machine crashed with fatal results to the crew on 10 September 1912, and this initiated a ban by the War Office on the use of monoplanes, which was to have far-reaching effects, although the Admiralty continued with their use.
A single machine built with new wings, Works No.111, was tested but was not a success. The final version of the Coanda monoplanes was affected by the accident and although twenty were built, most were converted to biplanes. The overseas sales, mainly to Rumania and license manufacture in Italy, were badly affected, resulting in only one machine being built by Caproni.
All machines were built as two-seaters except for Works No.183, known as the SB.5, construction of which for Italy was discontinued. The fuselage was used later in the construction of the Scout Type A.
Power:
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Six school aircraft, Works Nos.77, 132, 186-189. Seven side-byside, Works Nos.80, 110, 164-166 and 176-177.
80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Two Military Trials aircraft, Works Nos. 105-106
70hp Daimler four-cylinder inline water-cooled. One aircraft, Works No.111.
80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Twenty aircraft approx., Works Nos. 118, 121-123, 131, 142, 154 and 196 plus one built by Caproni
Data School
Span 40ft
Area 275 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 7ft
Weight 770 lb
Weight allup 1,100lb
Data Side-by-side
Span 41ft 3in
Area 275 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 7ft
Weight 770 lb
Weight allup 1,100lb
Data Military Competition
Span 40ft
Area 242 sq ft
Length 28ft 3in
Height 7ft
Weight 1,000lb
Weight allup 1,710lb
Data Daimler
Span 39ft 4in
Area 260 sq ft
Length 30ft 9in
Height 7ft
Weight 1,200lb
Weight allup 1,850lb
Data Military
Span 42ft 9in
Area 280 sq ft
Length 29ft 2in
Height 7ft
Weight 1,050lb
Weight allup 1,775 lb
After working in France, Henri Coanda, son of the Rumanian War Minister, began work as a designer at Bristol in January 1912. After carrying out some redesign of the Prier-Dickson monoplanes, he followed with a tandem two-seater of similar type. The prototype, Works No.77 went to Larkhill for testing in March 1912 and was followed by a batch of five more for Italy and Rumania. In March a side-by-side version, Works No.80 was flown followed by a further six, of which Italy purchased two and Rumania three.
Two of a variant for the British Military Trials were produced later in the year, Works Nos. 105-106 and both were entered. After achieving joint third place, both were bought by the War Office for operation by the RFC as serial Nos.263 and 262 respectively. The former machine crashed with fatal results to the crew on 10 September 1912, and this initiated a ban by the War Office on the use of monoplanes, which was to have far-reaching effects, although the Admiralty continued with their use.
A single machine built with new wings, Works No.111, was tested but was not a success. The final version of the Coanda monoplanes was affected by the accident and although twenty were built, most were converted to biplanes. The overseas sales, mainly to Rumania and license manufacture in Italy, were badly affected, resulting in only one machine being built by Caproni.
All machines were built as two-seaters except for Works No.183, known as the SB.5, construction of which for Italy was discontinued. The fuselage was used later in the construction of the Scout Type A.
Power:
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Six school aircraft, Works Nos.77, 132, 186-189. Seven side-byside, Works Nos.80, 110, 164-166 and 176-177.
80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Two Military Trials aircraft, Works Nos. 105-106
70hp Daimler four-cylinder inline water-cooled. One aircraft, Works No.111.
80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Twenty aircraft approx., Works Nos. 118, 121-123, 131, 142, 154 and 196 plus one built by Caproni
Data School
Span 40ft
Area 275 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 7ft
Weight 770 lb
Weight allup 1,100lb
Data Side-by-side
Span 41ft 3in
Area 275 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 7ft
Weight 770 lb
Weight allup 1,100lb
Data Military Competition
Span 40ft
Area 242 sq ft
Length 28ft 3in
Height 7ft
Weight 1,000lb
Weight allup 1,710lb
Data Daimler
Span 39ft 4in
Area 260 sq ft
Length 30ft 9in
Height 7ft
Weight 1,200lb
Weight allup 1,850lb
Data Military
Span 42ft 9in
Area 280 sq ft
Length 29ft 2in
Height 7ft
Weight 1,050lb
Weight allup 1,775 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL GE.1 biplane. (Gordon England)
After the conversion of the Type T biplane, Gordon England was responsible for the design of a two-seater, side-by-side, two bay biplane for military use; it was to be easily transportable. The machine was tested in May and June 1912 and passed to the German Bristol Co., but was found to be unsuitable for school use. It was returned to Filton in September and scrapped.
The fuselage had a front mounted radiator and a hinged bonnet and was plywood covered at the front. The lower wing passed below the fuselage. Lateral control was by warping with dual control by wheel. The long fin was later deleted and one as on the GE.2 fitted. One aircraft, Works No.64, was built.
Power: 50hp Clerget four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving the propeller at half engine speed.
Data
Span 33ft 8in
Area 320 sq ft
Length 29ft
Speed 65 mph
After the conversion of the Type T biplane, Gordon England was responsible for the design of a two-seater, side-by-side, two bay biplane for military use; it was to be easily transportable. The machine was tested in May and June 1912 and passed to the German Bristol Co., but was found to be unsuitable for school use. It was returned to Filton in September and scrapped.
The fuselage had a front mounted radiator and a hinged bonnet and was plywood covered at the front. The lower wing passed below the fuselage. Lateral control was by warping with dual control by wheel. The long fin was later deleted and one as on the GE.2 fitted. One aircraft, Works No.64, was built.
Power: 50hp Clerget four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving the propeller at half engine speed.
Data
Span 33ft 8in
Area 320 sq ft
Length 29ft
Speed 65 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL GE.2 biplanes
Two aircraft, developed from the GE.1, were built for entry in the Military Trials of August 1912. Both machines had increased span and rounded wing tips and the fuselage was mounted above the lower wing. One aircraft was fitted with an air-cooled rotary, the other retained a front radiator for a water-cooled engine with geared down propeller. Two aircraft were built, Works No. 103 with Gnome was No. 12, and Works No. 104 with Daimler-Mercedes was No. 13 in the Military Trials.
Power:
100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 9ft 6in diameter propeller.
70hp Daimler-Mercedes four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a four-bladed propeller at half engine speed.
Data No.103
Span 40ft
Chord 5ft
Area 400 sq ft
Length 31ft
Weight 1,080 lb (No. 104, 1,100 lb)
Weight allup 1,980 lb (No.104, 2,000 lb)
Speed 68 mph (No. 104, 62 mph)
Two aircraft, developed from the GE.1, were built for entry in the Military Trials of August 1912. Both machines had increased span and rounded wing tips and the fuselage was mounted above the lower wing. One aircraft was fitted with an air-cooled rotary, the other retained a front radiator for a water-cooled engine with geared down propeller. Two aircraft were built, Works No. 103 with Gnome was No. 12, and Works No. 104 with Daimler-Mercedes was No. 13 in the Military Trials.
Power:
100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 9ft 6in diameter propeller.
70hp Daimler-Mercedes four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a four-bladed propeller at half engine speed.
Data No.103
Span 40ft
Chord 5ft
Area 400 sq ft
Length 31ft
Weight 1,080 lb (No. 104, 1,100 lb)
Weight allup 1,980 lb (No.104, 2,000 lb)
Speed 68 mph (No. 104, 62 mph)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL GE.3 biplanes
The GE.3 was the final development from the GE.1 and was intended for the Turkish government. The seats were in tandem and the fuselage was faired to circular section. The wings, tail surfaces and detail features were derived from the GE.2. Turkey, at war with Italy, was blockaded by the Italians and delivery was prevented. Problems also existed with weakness of the wing structure and the design was abandoned. Two aircraft were built Works Nos. 11, 23.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving an 8ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 39ft 4in
Chord 5ft
Area 387 sq ft
Length 26ft 3in
Weight 1,0961b
Weight allup 1,9961b
Speed 65 mph
The GE.3 was the final development from the GE.1 and was intended for the Turkish government. The seats were in tandem and the fuselage was faired to circular section. The wings, tail surfaces and detail features were derived from the GE.2. Turkey, at war with Italy, was blockaded by the Italians and delivery was prevented. Problems also existed with weakness of the wing structure and the design was abandoned. Two aircraft were built Works Nos. 11, 23.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving an 8ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 39ft 4in
Chord 5ft
Area 387 sq ft
Length 26ft 3in
Weight 1,0961b
Weight allup 1,9961b
Speed 65 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL COANDA Type BR.7 and Daimler biplanes
This long-range, two-seater biplane was designed as a result of interest by Spain and Germany, and was first seen at Olympia in February 1913. There was a divergence of requirements, for the Spanish type had a Renault engine, whilst a Daimler was specified by Germany. Only one of the latter machines was eventually built at Halberstadt by the German Bristol works. This had extended wings, tapered ailerons and an extra rudder below the tail.
At Bristol seven BR.7's were built, of which five for the Spanish government were not accepted. The prototype, Works No. 157, flew in March 1913, but was kept at Larkhill as an advanced trainer. Works No. 158 was destroyed after a fire in the air, Nos.160, 163 were rarely used. A vee type undercarriage was tested on No. 163 and the final machine, No. 178, was built with increased span, but remained at Filton.
Power:
70hp Renault vee eight-cylinder air-cooled
90hp Daimler vee eight-cylinder water-cooled
Data 70hp Renault
Span 38ft
Area 440 sq ft
Length 27ft
Weight 946 lb
Weight allup 1,826lb
Speed 63 mph
Endurance 5hr
Seven aircraft built. Works Nos.157-158, 160-163 & 178.
Data 90hp Daimler
Span 57ft
Area 570 sq ft
Length 27ft 5in
Weight 1,200lb
Weight allup 2,100lb
Speed 65 mph
Endurance 5hr
One aircraft built at Deutsche-Bristol Werke, Halberstadt, Germany
This long-range, two-seater biplane was designed as a result of interest by Spain and Germany, and was first seen at Olympia in February 1913. There was a divergence of requirements, for the Spanish type had a Renault engine, whilst a Daimler was specified by Germany. Only one of the latter machines was eventually built at Halberstadt by the German Bristol works. This had extended wings, tapered ailerons and an extra rudder below the tail.
At Bristol seven BR.7's were built, of which five for the Spanish government were not accepted. The prototype, Works No. 157, flew in March 1913, but was kept at Larkhill as an advanced trainer. Works No. 158 was destroyed after a fire in the air, Nos.160, 163 were rarely used. A vee type undercarriage was tested on No. 163 and the final machine, No. 178, was built with increased span, but remained at Filton.
Power:
70hp Renault vee eight-cylinder air-cooled
90hp Daimler vee eight-cylinder water-cooled
Data 70hp Renault
Span 38ft
Area 440 sq ft
Length 27ft
Weight 946 lb
Weight allup 1,826lb
Speed 63 mph
Endurance 5hr
Seven aircraft built. Works Nos.157-158, 160-163 & 178.
Data 90hp Daimler
Span 57ft
Area 570 sq ft
Length 27ft 5in
Weight 1,200lb
Weight allup 2,100lb
Speed 65 mph
Endurance 5hr
One aircraft built at Deutsche-Bristol Werke, Halberstadt, Germany
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL COANDA hydro-biplanes
A central float two-seater seaplane, attributed to Coanda but similar in some respects to the GE.3 land-plane, was sent to the Saunders works at Cowes for trials early in 1913. The float, designed by Gnosspelius, was too heavy and the machine could not lift off from the water by pilot Harry Busteed. A Saunders-made Consuta float was fitted, and on 15 1913 the aircraft took off successfully, but engine failure necessitated an emergency alighting, the force of which burst the float and nearly resulted in the drowning of Busteed. The aircraft, Works No.120, was destroyed and a replacement for the Admiralty (Serial No. 15) was provided by conversion of one of the Coanda monoplanes (Serial No.121). This was tested initially as a land-plane at Larkhill but needed a new fuselage. After the rebuilding it was tested as a seaplane in September 1913 at Dale in Pembrokeshire. It was further rebuilt as Works No.205 and delivered again early in 1914. Further improvements were needed and the machine was again largely rebuilt with staggered wings with ailerons and a new fin, identified as Type TB.8H.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data Works No.120 (No type number)*
Span 38ft 8in
Area 436 sq ft
Length 27ft 10in
*As a land-plane before conversion to No.205.
Data Works No.121 (TB.8)
Span 37ft 8in
Area 450 sq ft
Length 29ft 2in
Weight 970 lb
Weight allup 1,665lb
Speed 65-75 mph
Endurance 5hr
Data Works No.205 (TB.8)
Span 37ft 8in
Area 450 sq ft
Length 30ft 6in
Weight 970 lb
Weight allup 1,650lb
Endurance 4hr
BRISTOL COANDA biplane Type BC.2
This project for a large seaplane was prepared for the Admiralty between April and June 1913 before the TB.8H, Works No.205, was accepted. It was to be fitted with a 200hp Clerget V8 water-cooled engine with two-speed reduction gear. In the spring of 1914 the Admiralty again pursued the purchase of two large seaplanes with the two speed gear. Works Nos.1478 were allocated, but these were eventually built as TB.8 aircraft.
A central float two-seater seaplane, attributed to Coanda but similar in some respects to the GE.3 land-plane, was sent to the Saunders works at Cowes for trials early in 1913. The float, designed by Gnosspelius, was too heavy and the machine could not lift off from the water by pilot Harry Busteed. A Saunders-made Consuta float was fitted, and on 15 1913 the aircraft took off successfully, but engine failure necessitated an emergency alighting, the force of which burst the float and nearly resulted in the drowning of Busteed. The aircraft, Works No.120, was destroyed and a replacement for the Admiralty (Serial No. 15) was provided by conversion of one of the Coanda monoplanes (Serial No.121). This was tested initially as a land-plane at Larkhill but needed a new fuselage. After the rebuilding it was tested as a seaplane in September 1913 at Dale in Pembrokeshire. It was further rebuilt as Works No.205 and delivered again early in 1914. Further improvements were needed and the machine was again largely rebuilt with staggered wings with ailerons and a new fin, identified as Type TB.8H.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data Works No.120 (No type number)*
Span 38ft 8in
Area 436 sq ft
Length 27ft 10in
*As a land-plane before conversion to No.205.
Data Works No.121 (TB.8)
Span 37ft 8in
Area 450 sq ft
Length 29ft 2in
Weight 970 lb
Weight allup 1,665lb
Speed 65-75 mph
Endurance 5hr
Data Works No.205 (TB.8)
Span 37ft 8in
Area 450 sq ft
Length 30ft 6in
Weight 970 lb
Weight allup 1,650lb
Endurance 4hr
BRISTOL COANDA biplane Type BC.2
This project for a large seaplane was prepared for the Admiralty between April and June 1913 before the TB.8H, Works No.205, was accepted. It was to be fitted with a 200hp Clerget V8 water-cooled engine with two-speed reduction gear. In the spring of 1914 the Admiralty again pursued the purchase of two large seaplanes with the two speed gear. Works Nos.1478 were allocated, but these were eventually built as TB.8 aircraft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL COANDA biplane Type TB.8
The first of these two-seater land-planes for the Admiralty was made by the conversion of one of the redundant monoplanes (No. 144). It flew on 12 August 1913 at Eastchurch for the first time. It was rebuilt after a crash as Works No.225 with a vee type undercarriage and served in the RNAS from April 1914, still with its original serial No.43.
The TB.8 was most successful, and ten of the monoplanes, previously supplied to Italy Germany and Rumania, were bought back for conversion. After this new biplanes were built from Works No. 197, fitted with various engines to a total of fifty-three aircraft, mainly for use by the RNAS. The delivery of the last aircraft took place in early 1916. An exception was Works No.218, the only side-by-side TB.8 converted from the monoplane No. 177 and used at Larkhill.
Power:
80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
60hp and 80hp Le Rhone seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries.
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
100hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 37 ft 8 in
Length 29 ft 3 in
Area 450 sq ft
Weight 970 lb
Weight allup 1,665 lb
Speed 65-75 mph
Endurance 5hr
Aircraft built.WorksNos.il 8, 121, 143-4, 147-153, 196-198, 218, 225, 227-228, 331, 342, 870, 893
BRISTOL COANDA biplane Type GB.75.
This two-seater biplane was designed as an improvement on the TB.8, and was largely the work of Frank Barnwell. It was ordered by the Rumanian Prince Cantacuzene and was flown for the first time at Larkhill on 7 1914. Trials continued into June to overcome cooling and balance problems. The order was canceled at the end of June and, after an engine change, the aircraft was taken over by the RFC as serial No.610 or 601. It was exhibited at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1914.
Power:
75hp Gnome Monosoupape seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 37ft 8in
Area 450 sq ft
Weight 970 lb
Weight allup 1,650lb
Speed 65-75 mph
Endurance 5hr
One aircraft built. Works No.223.
BRISTOL COANDA biplane Type RB
A project for a two-seater tractor biplane with staggered seats, believed to be for Prince Cantacuzene and to be fitted with the 75hp Gnome Monosoupape that he had supplied for the GB .75, was prepared in May 1914.
The first of these two-seater land-planes for the Admiralty was made by the conversion of one of the redundant monoplanes (No. 144). It flew on 12 August 1913 at Eastchurch for the first time. It was rebuilt after a crash as Works No.225 with a vee type undercarriage and served in the RNAS from April 1914, still with its original serial No.43.
The TB.8 was most successful, and ten of the monoplanes, previously supplied to Italy Germany and Rumania, were bought back for conversion. After this new biplanes were built from Works No. 197, fitted with various engines to a total of fifty-three aircraft, mainly for use by the RNAS. The delivery of the last aircraft took place in early 1916. An exception was Works No.218, the only side-by-side TB.8 converted from the monoplane No. 177 and used at Larkhill.
Power:
80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
60hp and 80hp Le Rhone seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries.
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
100hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 37 ft 8 in
Length 29 ft 3 in
Area 450 sq ft
Weight 970 lb
Weight allup 1,665 lb
Speed 65-75 mph
Endurance 5hr
Aircraft built.WorksNos.il 8, 121, 143-4, 147-153, 196-198, 218, 225, 227-228, 331, 342, 870, 893
BRISTOL COANDA biplane Type GB.75.
This two-seater biplane was designed as an improvement on the TB.8, and was largely the work of Frank Barnwell. It was ordered by the Rumanian Prince Cantacuzene and was flown for the first time at Larkhill on 7 1914. Trials continued into June to overcome cooling and balance problems. The order was canceled at the end of June and, after an engine change, the aircraft was taken over by the RFC as serial No.610 or 601. It was exhibited at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1914.
Power:
75hp Gnome Monosoupape seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 37ft 8in
Area 450 sq ft
Weight 970 lb
Weight allup 1,650lb
Speed 65-75 mph
Endurance 5hr
One aircraft built. Works No.223.
BRISTOL COANDA biplane Type RB
A project for a two-seater tractor biplane with staggered seats, believed to be for Prince Cantacuzene and to be fitted with the 75hp Gnome Monosoupape that he had supplied for the GB .75, was prepared in May 1914.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL GB.1 biplane
A design was prepared by Barnwell for a single-seat racer to compete in the 1914 Gordon Bennett Contest, to be held in September, which was canceled by the war. The Board had earlier decided not to compete in the event and the machine was not built. It was similar in layout to the contemporary Scout, but with a fin, and was to be fitted with a 100hp Gnome Monosoupape engine.
BRISTOL SCOUT biplane Types A and B
The redundant fuselage of the monoplane SB .5 (Works No. 183) was the basis on which Barnwell designed a small single-seat biplane (Works No.206), which arrived at Larkhill for testing by Busteed in February 1914. After initial trials it was required for display at the Olympia Aero Show opening on 16 March 1914. Soon after the Show the Scout was fitted with increased span wings at Filton and was re-flown in May.
In June Lord Carbery bought the airframe for ?400 and installed his own Le Rhone. In the race from London to Manchester and back he damaged the machine during an intermediate landing. After repair at Filton he used it for a race from London to Paris and back on 11 July 1914, but ran out of fuel on the return leg and came down in the Channel. Carbery was saved but the Scout was lost.
Two additional machines were already in hand (Works Nos.229, 230) with some improvements to the cowling and wing bracing and became known as the Scout Type B. The machines, which had not flown when war was declared on 4 August 1914, were requisitioned by the War Office and identified with serial Nos.633 and 648 and then flown to Farnborough on 21 and 23 August 1914. Both saw service in France, and 633 at least was fitted with fixed rifles firing either side of the airscrew.
The performance of the Scout was sufficiently good to result in further orders for improved versions, the Types C and D, which were ordered in considerable numbers and delivered from 1915 onwards.
Power: Scout A and B 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Scout A also had 80hp Le Rhone seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data Scout A
Span 22ft & 24ft 7in
Area 161 sq ft and 198 sq ft
Length 19ft 9in
Height 8ft 6in
Weight 617 lb and 750 lb
Weight allup 957 lb &1,100 lb
Max speed 95 and 100 mph
Initial rate of climb 800ft per min
Endurance 3 and 5hr
One aircraft built Works No.206.
Data Scout B
Span 24ft 7in
Area 198 sq ft
Length 20ft 8in
Height 8ft 6in
Weight 750 lb
Weight allup 1,100lb
Max speed 100 mph
Initial rate of climb 1,000ft per min
Endurance 2 1/2 hr
Two aircraft built Works Nos.229, 230
A design was prepared by Barnwell for a single-seat racer to compete in the 1914 Gordon Bennett Contest, to be held in September, which was canceled by the war. The Board had earlier decided not to compete in the event and the machine was not built. It was similar in layout to the contemporary Scout, but with a fin, and was to be fitted with a 100hp Gnome Monosoupape engine.
BRISTOL SCOUT biplane Types A and B
The redundant fuselage of the monoplane SB .5 (Works No. 183) was the basis on which Barnwell designed a small single-seat biplane (Works No.206), which arrived at Larkhill for testing by Busteed in February 1914. After initial trials it was required for display at the Olympia Aero Show opening on 16 March 1914. Soon after the Show the Scout was fitted with increased span wings at Filton and was re-flown in May.
In June Lord Carbery bought the airframe for ?400 and installed his own Le Rhone. In the race from London to Manchester and back he damaged the machine during an intermediate landing. After repair at Filton he used it for a race from London to Paris and back on 11 July 1914, but ran out of fuel on the return leg and came down in the Channel. Carbery was saved but the Scout was lost.
Two additional machines were already in hand (Works Nos.229, 230) with some improvements to the cowling and wing bracing and became known as the Scout Type B. The machines, which had not flown when war was declared on 4 August 1914, were requisitioned by the War Office and identified with serial Nos.633 and 648 and then flown to Farnborough on 21 and 23 August 1914. Both saw service in France, and 633 at least was fitted with fixed rifles firing either side of the airscrew.
The performance of the Scout was sufficiently good to result in further orders for improved versions, the Types C and D, which were ordered in considerable numbers and delivered from 1915 onwards.
Power: Scout A and B 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary. Scout A also had 80hp Le Rhone seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data Scout A
Span 22ft & 24ft 7in
Area 161 sq ft and 198 sq ft
Length 19ft 9in
Height 8ft 6in
Weight 617 lb and 750 lb
Weight allup 957 lb &1,100 lb
Max speed 95 and 100 mph
Initial rate of climb 800ft per min
Endurance 3 and 5hr
One aircraft built Works No.206.
Data Scout B
Span 24ft 7in
Area 198 sq ft
Length 20ft 8in
Height 8ft 6in
Weight 750 lb
Weight allup 1,100lb
Max speed 100 mph
Initial rate of climb 1,000ft per min
Endurance 2 1/2 hr
Two aircraft built Works Nos.229, 230
Bristol Scout Type A of 1914.
The 80 hp Le Rhone Bristol Scout prototype which Lord John Carbery flew in the London-Paris-London Race on 11 July, 1914, and which was lost in the English Channel on the retun trip.
The 80 hp Le Rhone Bristol Scout prototype which Lord John Carbery flew in the London-Paris-London Race on 11 July, 1914, and which was lost in the English Channel on the retun trip.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL COANDA biplane Type PB.8
This two-seater pusher biplane was a Boxkite replacement for the Brooklands school. It was delivered to Brooklands in July 1914 after a long period on low priority in the works, but was never flown as the engine was immediately requisitioned on arrival, by the War Office.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 27ft 6in
Length 27ft 6in
One aircraft built. Works No. 199.
This two-seater pusher biplane was a Boxkite replacement for the Brooklands school. It was delivered to Brooklands in July 1914 after a long period on low priority in the works, but was never flown as the engine was immediately requisitioned on arrival, by the War Office.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 27ft 6in
Length 27ft 6in
One aircraft built. Works No. 199.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRISTOL S.S.A. (single-seat armored) biplane
This Scout type was designed by Coanda for a French government requirement with which Breguet was to be involved. It first flew on 8 May 1914. at Larkhill piloted by Sippe. After being damaged at Filton when being flown by Busteed, it was sent to the Breguet works in the damaged condition.
The forward fuselage to aft of the pilot's seat was a riveted steel monocoque enclosing the engine, tanks and pilot. The front of the engine was covered by a large steel spinner with cooling slots. The undercarriage featured castor wheels and rearward extended skids, which obviated the need for a tail-skid. The tail units were similar to those of the Scout biplane. One aircraft built Works No.219.
Power: 80hp Clerget seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 26ft 3in
Weight 913 1b
Area 200 sq ft
Max. speed 106 mph (estimated)
Length 18ft 9in
Endurance 5hr
This Scout type was designed by Coanda for a French government requirement with which Breguet was to be involved. It first flew on 8 May 1914. at Larkhill piloted by Sippe. After being damaged at Filton when being flown by Busteed, it was sent to the Breguet works in the damaged condition.
The forward fuselage to aft of the pilot's seat was a riveted steel monocoque enclosing the engine, tanks and pilot. The front of the engine was covered by a large steel spinner with cooling slots. The undercarriage featured castor wheels and rearward extended skids, which obviated the need for a tail-skid. The tail units were similar to those of the Scout biplane. One aircraft built Works No.219.
Power: 80hp Clerget seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 26ft 3in
Weight 913 1b
Area 200 sq ft
Max. speed 106 mph (estimated)
Length 18ft 9in
Endurance 5hr
Bristol SSA biplane. This armored Scout was built for a French requirement, but only one example was built.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRITAIN triplane (Seamer Brothers, Enfield, Middlesex)
This machine was designed by Mr. Henry Britain and was tested successfully by B. Seamer on 30 August 1909 at Middleton House, Forty Hill, Wembley, Middlesex. It rose to a height of about two feet but lack of space prevented a longer flight. A 40hp engine was fitted. Patent No.21952 of 1908 refers.
This machine was designed by Mr. Henry Britain and was tested successfully by B. Seamer on 30 August 1909 at Middleton House, Forty Hill, Wembley, Middlesex. It rose to a height of about two feet but lack of space prevented a longer flight. A 40hp engine was fitted. Patent No.21952 of 1908 refers.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BRITISH MATCHLESS convertiplane (Arthur Phillips, Market Drayton, Shropshire)
This machine was the invention of Phillips, an engineer and cycle maker, and was covered by Patent No.28 119/1908. It consisted of a rectangular tubular structure, which tapered down to the base where the operator was placed. The biplane wings were mounted on large bearings and could pivot through 90 degrees in unison with the four fanlike propellers. The propeller shafts and wing chord line would be vertical for takeoff and turned to horizontal for forward flight. The propeller shafts were fitted with universal joints to enable the thrust to be deflected for control purposes.
The machine was built in scale form with a Douglas motor cycle engine and was flown on several occasions tethered by a rope. A seven-cylinder two-stroke engine of 12hp was to be fitted and this, together with the structure of the machine, are still to be seen in the Shuttleworth Collection. Phillips was said to know the Wright brothers and to be esteemed by Moore-Brabazon and other enthusiasts.
Data for model.
Span 14ft 6in.
Chord 3 ft 6in.
Gap 2ft 6in.
Length 6ft 2in.
Height 6ft 6in.
This machine was the invention of Phillips, an engineer and cycle maker, and was covered by Patent No.28 119/1908. It consisted of a rectangular tubular structure, which tapered down to the base where the operator was placed. The biplane wings were mounted on large bearings and could pivot through 90 degrees in unison with the four fanlike propellers. The propeller shafts and wing chord line would be vertical for takeoff and turned to horizontal for forward flight. The propeller shafts were fitted with universal joints to enable the thrust to be deflected for control purposes.
The machine was built in scale form with a Douglas motor cycle engine and was flown on several occasions tethered by a rope. A seven-cylinder two-stroke engine of 12hp was to be fitted and this, together with the structure of the machine, are still to be seen in the Shuttleworth Collection. Phillips was said to know the Wright brothers and to be esteemed by Moore-Brabazon and other enthusiasts.
Data for model.
Span 14ft 6in.
Chord 3 ft 6in.
Gap 2ft 6in.
Length 6ft 2in.
Height 6ft 6in.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BROCKLEHURST monoplane. (Major Brocklehurst, Windermere & Eastchurch.)
This machine appeared at Eastchurch in January 1912 after construction at Windermere. It was described as being designed by Major Brocklehurst, with wings of Etrich style to have automatic stability. The wings were pivoted to allow them to lift under pressure and were interconnected to the undercarriage, through springs, to effect their return. It is believed to have been fitted with an Anzani engine and was based on Patent 24902/1909 for such a wing. FB Fowler, who later ran the Eastbourne Aviation Co., was probably responsible for the design of the landing chassis and other aspects of its construction.
The first mention of this machine refers to a mishap at Eastchurch on 13 January 1913. (The Aeroplane 25 January 1913 (p.85), when it was towed back to its shed across the airfield at 25 mph by the Jezzi biplane, from the point where it was stranded.
The machine was transferred to Windermere and fitted with 'roller floats' possibly of the type covered by Patent 6999/1909 granted to Kitchen and Storey. The last reference to the aircraft was in The Aeroplane dated 10 April 1913 (p.431), where it was stated that 'Major Brocklehurst's hydromonoplane with Bat's wings' was under construction.
Brocklehurst's earlier Patent No.5662/1909 was for a scheme to provide lateral and pitch control by twisting the tail of an aircraft. His later Patent No.26810/1911, was for 'Batlike' wings in either biplane or monoplane form, which could be folded.
This machine appeared at Eastchurch in January 1912 after construction at Windermere. It was described as being designed by Major Brocklehurst, with wings of Etrich style to have automatic stability. The wings were pivoted to allow them to lift under pressure and were interconnected to the undercarriage, through springs, to effect their return. It is believed to have been fitted with an Anzani engine and was based on Patent 24902/1909 for such a wing. FB Fowler, who later ran the Eastbourne Aviation Co., was probably responsible for the design of the landing chassis and other aspects of its construction.
The first mention of this machine refers to a mishap at Eastchurch on 13 January 1913. (The Aeroplane 25 January 1913 (p.85), when it was towed back to its shed across the airfield at 25 mph by the Jezzi biplane, from the point where it was stranded.
The machine was transferred to Windermere and fitted with 'roller floats' possibly of the type covered by Patent 6999/1909 granted to Kitchen and Storey. The last reference to the aircraft was in The Aeroplane dated 10 April 1913 (p.431), where it was stated that 'Major Brocklehurst's hydromonoplane with Bat's wings' was under construction.
Brocklehurst's earlier Patent No.5662/1909 was for a scheme to provide lateral and pitch control by twisting the tail of an aircraft. His later Patent No.26810/1911, was for 'Batlike' wings in either biplane or monoplane form, which could be folded.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BROCKLEY monoplane (Messrs. Norrie, Duval & Mitchell, Brockley Jack Inn, London, SE.4)
Tests were made of this machine at Abbey Wood, Kent, but damage to the undercarriage and propeller prevented the machine from flying. The construction of the machine, which began in 1908, was of bamboo and steel tubing. Various JAP engines, all of motorcycle type, were tried, starting with a single-cylinder 2.5hp, then a 6hp twin and finally a 16hp racing vee-twin.
Tests were made of this machine at Abbey Wood, Kent, but damage to the undercarriage and propeller prevented the machine from flying. The construction of the machine, which began in 1908, was of bamboo and steel tubing. Various JAP engines, all of motorcycle type, were tried, starting with a single-cylinder 2.5hp, then a 6hp twin and finally a 16hp racing vee-twin.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BUSH biplane glider (Eldon, Gilbert and Jon Bush, Keynsham, Bristol)
These three brothers designed and built seven biplane gliders between 1909 and 1912.
No.1 was constructed of ash, was of Wright type, but was heavy and did not fly.
No.2 was No.1 reduced in weight and, although flown, was unstable longitudinally.
No.3 was of Curtiss type and built in 1910. It had ailerons hinged to the trailing edges of the bottom wings. Span 30ft, length 24ft, area 260 sq ft. This machine flew for short distances.
No.4 was of Farman type and built at Cambridge by Eldon Bush in 1910. It was fitted with a wheeled undercarriage.
Nos.5, 6 and 7 were modifications of No.4 with the front elevator omitted.
No.7, known as 'The Chocolate Soldier' had Bleriot type elevators but was smashed while under tow by a car.
These three brothers designed and built seven biplane gliders between 1909 and 1912.
No.1 was constructed of ash, was of Wright type, but was heavy and did not fly.
No.2 was No.1 reduced in weight and, although flown, was unstable longitudinally.
No.3 was of Curtiss type and built in 1910. It had ailerons hinged to the trailing edges of the bottom wings. Span 30ft, length 24ft, area 260 sq ft. This machine flew for short distances.
No.4 was of Farman type and built at Cambridge by Eldon Bush in 1910. It was fitted with a wheeled undercarriage.
Nos.5, 6 and 7 were modifications of No.4 with the front elevator omitted.
No.7, known as 'The Chocolate Soldier' had Bleriot type elevators but was smashed while under tow by a car.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BUSH MOTORPLANE biplanes Nos.8 and 9
No.8 was built at Bath by the brothers in 1912. It was similar to a Caudron and was a single-seater intended to be powered by an inline engine.
No.9 was No.8 with the nacelle widened to accept a 50hp Gnome rotary engine, the propeller shaft of which broke on test. The machine was not fitted with a replacement as Eldon Bush went to Canada, returning in 1915 to join the RNAS in which service he was killed in 1917.
No.8 was built at Bath by the brothers in 1912. It was similar to a Caudron and was a single-seater intended to be powered by an inline engine.
No.9 was No.8 with the nacelle widened to accept a 50hp Gnome rotary engine, the propeller shaft of which broke on test. The machine was not fitted with a replacement as Eldon Bush went to Canada, returning in 1915 to join the RNAS in which service he was killed in 1917.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CAMERON monoplane (Donald 'Dhonal' Angus Allan Cameron, Castlewood College, Rathmines, Dublin)
Built by an eighteen year old pupil and illustrated in Flight 14 May 1910 (p.369), it appears to have been built as a glider, perhaps for a motor to be fitted later. Dhonal Cameron was of Scottish birth but later moved to England, where between 1950 and 1965 he worked as a draughtsman tracer with Vickers at Weybridge.
Built by an eighteen year old pupil and illustrated in Flight 14 May 1910 (p.369), it appears to have been built as a glider, perhaps for a motor to be fitted later. Dhonal Cameron was of Scottish birth but later moved to England, where between 1950 and 1965 he worked as a draughtsman tracer with Vickers at Weybridge.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CAMPBELL BRITON monoplane (built for Malcolm Campbell, Bromley, Kent by C.F. McGeorge at Orpington)
Campbell, who became famous as a record breaker on both land and water in later years, built a monoplane in 1909-1910. Inspired by Bleriot's Channel crossing, the machine resembled a Bleriot in many respects, but was fitted with a 10hp JAP vee-twin motorcycle engine of insufficient power. Damage was caused after it stalled on takeoff, but after repairs a larger 40hp engine was fitted and hops were achieved on several occasions in the summer and autumn of 1910. However, lack of funds precluded continued testing and the machine was finally sold by Friswells.
Data
Span 39ft
Campbell, who became famous as a record breaker on both land and water in later years, built a monoplane in 1909-1910. Inspired by Bleriot's Channel crossing, the machine resembled a Bleriot in many respects, but was fitted with a 10hp JAP vee-twin motorcycle engine of insufficient power. Damage was caused after it stalled on takeoff, but after repairs a larger 40hp engine was fitted and hops were achieved on several occasions in the summer and autumn of 1910. However, lack of funds precluded continued testing and the machine was finally sold by Friswells.
Data
Span 39ft
Campbell Briton monoplane of 1910. Malcolm Campbell later became a famous racing and record breaking motorist.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CANDLER STELLA or MONOFOIL monoplane (Hilda Vale Rd., Farnborough, Kent)
This single-seat tractor monoplane, similar to a Bleriot, was being built in 1909-1910 for H.A. Wagstaff Candler of London. The construction was earned out by the Farnborough Aviation Works in Kent, assistance being provided by C.H.M. Alderson (q.v.). The Stella, also referred to as the Monofoil, was offered in an incomplete state to the Science Museum in 1926, but was not accepted.
Data
Span 30ft
Area 247 sq ft
Length 26ft
Weight 250 lb
ALDERSON monoplane (C.H.M.A. Alderson, Farnborough Aviation Works, Farnborough, Orpington, Kent)
Few details of this machine, reported built in 1910, can be traced. Alderson, who formed his company in 1909, had been actively interested in aviation since he experienced a balloon flight in France in 1880. In 1901 he assisted Thomas Moy with experiments with a model ornithopter and in 1905-1909, as a friend of Frederick J. Stringfellow, he assisted with the reclamation of the Stringfellow artifacts for donation to the Science Museum. A member of the Aeronautical Society and Aeronautical Institute and Club, he contributed to the building of the Candler Stella (q.v.) in 1909 at his works. In that year he appealed for funds to complete his aircraft, which may have referred to the Candler Stella, which was never completed.
However, in March 1910 The Times reported that Alderson had built a monoplane of 38ft wingspan with a 50hp four-cylinder engine. The weight without engine was 250 lb. In August 1910 Alderson visited Cumberland, where he had been born in 1854 and while there flew a Cody kite. At this time he was reported to be building a biplane to be named The Brae, of which nothing further was heard. Alderson died in 1929.
This single-seat tractor monoplane, similar to a Bleriot, was being built in 1909-1910 for H.A. Wagstaff Candler of London. The construction was earned out by the Farnborough Aviation Works in Kent, assistance being provided by C.H.M. Alderson (q.v.). The Stella, also referred to as the Monofoil, was offered in an incomplete state to the Science Museum in 1926, but was not accepted.
Data
Span 30ft
Area 247 sq ft
Length 26ft
Weight 250 lb
ALDERSON monoplane (C.H.M.A. Alderson, Farnborough Aviation Works, Farnborough, Orpington, Kent)
Few details of this machine, reported built in 1910, can be traced. Alderson, who formed his company in 1909, had been actively interested in aviation since he experienced a balloon flight in France in 1880. In 1901 he assisted Thomas Moy with experiments with a model ornithopter and in 1905-1909, as a friend of Frederick J. Stringfellow, he assisted with the reclamation of the Stringfellow artifacts for donation to the Science Museum. A member of the Aeronautical Society and Aeronautical Institute and Club, he contributed to the building of the Candler Stella (q.v.) in 1909 at his works. In that year he appealed for funds to complete his aircraft, which may have referred to the Candler Stella, which was never completed.
However, in March 1910 The Times reported that Alderson had built a monoplane of 38ft wingspan with a 50hp four-cylinder engine. The weight without engine was 250 lb. In August 1910 Alderson visited Cumberland, where he had been born in 1854 and while there flew a Cody kite. At this time he was reported to be building a biplane to be named The Brae, of which nothing further was heard. Alderson died in 1929.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CARTER biplane
No details are available of this single-seat biplane, which arrived at Salisbury Plain early in January 1911. The power plant was a 60hp eight-cylinder air-cooled motor of X-form made by the Nonpareil Fitting Co. of Birmingham. The machine made a number of short straight flights only by the end of January in the hands of the owner. There were no further reports.
No details are available of this single-seat biplane, which arrived at Salisbury Plain early in January 1911. The power plant was a 60hp eight-cylinder air-cooled motor of X-form made by the Nonpareil Fitting Co. of Birmingham. The machine made a number of short straight flights only by the end of January in the hands of the owner. There were no further reports.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CAYLEY helicopter-aeroplane, 1842-1843
This was a project described in the Mechanics Magazine, which was not constructed, no doubt because of the lack of a suitable motor so its practicability was not proved. The configuration can be seen in the drawings, which are those that accompanied the article and show certain similarities with the No.2 and 3 gliders. The four rotating wings opened out into eight blades for lifting, but became fixed surfaces for forward flight, with propulsion by two four-bladed propellers.
Cayley appears to have been inspired by a letter dated 25 July 1842, written to him by Robert Taylor, proposing a similar scheme some nine months before Cayley's article.
This was a project described in the Mechanics Magazine, which was not constructed, no doubt because of the lack of a suitable motor so its practicability was not proved. The configuration can be seen in the drawings, which are those that accompanied the article and show certain similarities with the No.2 and 3 gliders. The four rotating wings opened out into eight blades for lifting, but became fixed surfaces for forward flight, with propulsion by two four-bladed propellers.
Cayley appears to have been inspired by a letter dated 25 July 1842, written to him by Robert Taylor, proposing a similar scheme some nine months before Cayley's article.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CAYLEY GLIDERS (Sir George Cayley, 1773-1857. Brompton Hall, near Scarborough, Yorkshire)
Sir George Cayley was a scientist and inventor in a number of fields and included aeronautics among his studies. In articles in various journals he described the principles and configuration of the aeroplane. Much of his work is recorded in his notebooks, which have survived, and he is internationally regarded as the inventor of the aeroplane in its basic form. Apart from his designs for gliders, he published a scheme to a 'borrowed' theory for a double rotor helicopter in 1842. He realized the need for a source of lightweight power other than manpower and experimented with a gunpowder engine, but none of the craft actually constructed was fitted with an engine.
His known designs of full size gliders, realized over a period of forty-two years were flown mostly with ballast, but later a boy and finally a man, his coachman, were carried aloft.
CAYLEY monoplane glider No.1, 1809
This machine, which had a wing area of 300 sq ft and a loaded weight of 140 lb, was fitted with a tail unit with adjustable rudder. The glides were initiated by towing and, in some, ballast was carried, although in certain conditions the lift generated was sufficient to carry the man or boy towing the machine into the air.
CAYLEY triplane glider No.2,1849.
A sketch of this triplane glider was found by C.H. Gibbs-Smith in 1961. It was operated mainly with ballast, but carried a boy on a few occasions for short glides.
The triplane wing structure was extended aft to carry a cruciform tail unit and a boat shaped nacelle was carried on struts below. The whole machine rested on three lightweight wooden wheels. Control was provided by a second cruciform tail unit on a pole at the rear of the nacelle and by adjustment of the upper elevator by cords from the nacelle. Two wings of 6 ft span were also fitted for control by the pilot, so that Cayley could observe their effect on the glide angle.
Data
Wing area 338 sq ft
Weight 130lb
CAYLEY monoplane glider No.3,1853
Also referred to as possibly a biplane or triplane, this monoplane design was described as 'a Governable Parachute' and information on it was published in Mechanics Magazine of 25 September 1852. This is believed to be the version tested in 1853 which made the first known manned glider flight of some 500 yards across Brompton Dale. Apart from the use of a monoplane lifting surface, the general layout was similar in most respects to the 1849 glider. The empty weight was 165 lb.
Subsequent to the finding of Sir George's notebooks in the 1960s, a reproduction of this machine was constructed. This was towed or launched by bungee when flown for filming purposes, prior to being housed in the Museum of Science and Industry, Manchester.
Sir George Cayley was a scientist and inventor in a number of fields and included aeronautics among his studies. In articles in various journals he described the principles and configuration of the aeroplane. Much of his work is recorded in his notebooks, which have survived, and he is internationally regarded as the inventor of the aeroplane in its basic form. Apart from his designs for gliders, he published a scheme to a 'borrowed' theory for a double rotor helicopter in 1842. He realized the need for a source of lightweight power other than manpower and experimented with a gunpowder engine, but none of the craft actually constructed was fitted with an engine.
His known designs of full size gliders, realized over a period of forty-two years were flown mostly with ballast, but later a boy and finally a man, his coachman, were carried aloft.
CAYLEY monoplane glider No.1, 1809
This machine, which had a wing area of 300 sq ft and a loaded weight of 140 lb, was fitted with a tail unit with adjustable rudder. The glides were initiated by towing and, in some, ballast was carried, although in certain conditions the lift generated was sufficient to carry the man or boy towing the machine into the air.
CAYLEY triplane glider No.2,1849.
A sketch of this triplane glider was found by C.H. Gibbs-Smith in 1961. It was operated mainly with ballast, but carried a boy on a few occasions for short glides.
The triplane wing structure was extended aft to carry a cruciform tail unit and a boat shaped nacelle was carried on struts below. The whole machine rested on three lightweight wooden wheels. Control was provided by a second cruciform tail unit on a pole at the rear of the nacelle and by adjustment of the upper elevator by cords from the nacelle. Two wings of 6 ft span were also fitted for control by the pilot, so that Cayley could observe their effect on the glide angle.
Data
Wing area 338 sq ft
Weight 130lb
CAYLEY monoplane glider No.3,1853
Also referred to as possibly a biplane or triplane, this monoplane design was described as 'a Governable Parachute' and information on it was published in Mechanics Magazine of 25 September 1852. This is believed to be the version tested in 1853 which made the first known manned glider flight of some 500 yards across Brompton Dale. Apart from the use of a monoplane lifting surface, the general layout was similar in most respects to the 1849 glider. The empty weight was 165 lb.
Subsequent to the finding of Sir George's notebooks in the 1960s, a reproduction of this machine was constructed. This was towed or launched by bungee when flown for filming purposes, prior to being housed in the Museum of Science and Industry, Manchester.
Cayley's 'Governable Parachute' monoplane glider of 1852-1853 which made a manned flight of 500 yards.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CHANNON biplane (Ernest Huddleston and Ralph Channon, Dorchester)
The glider was based on the Wright-type with front biplane elevator and single rudder on the rear boom. It was later converted to a powered pusher type with twin booms and rudders. The ailerons were transferred from the struts to the top wings. The wheels were removed and it was tested at Maiden Castle using starting tracks in September 1910, when it flew for 100 yards. The machine was under-powered, finance was short, and the project was discontinued. The machine was destroyed by a fire at the works.
Power: 23hp White and Poppe six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 50ft.
The glider was based on the Wright-type with front biplane elevator and single rudder on the rear boom. It was later converted to a powered pusher type with twin booms and rudders. The ailerons were transferred from the struts to the top wings. The wheels were removed and it was tested at Maiden Castle using starting tracks in September 1910, when it flew for 100 yards. The machine was under-powered, finance was short, and the project was discontinued. The machine was destroyed by a fire at the works.
Power: 23hp White and Poppe six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 50ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CHANTER monoplane (M. Chanter, Hendon and Shoreham)
This machine was built at Hendon and moved to Shoreham in November 1911, when Chanter transferred his school. It was a single-seater monoplane based on the Nieuport and fitted with a 35hp fan-type Anzani. It flew for the first time at Shoreham on 1 January 1912, but was destroyed in a hangar fire on 29 February 1912.
This machine was built at Hendon and moved to Shoreham in November 1911, when Chanter transferred his school. It was a single-seater monoplane based on the Nieuport and fitted with a 35hp fan-type Anzani. It flew for the first time at Shoreham on 1 January 1912, but was destroyed in a hangar fire on 29 February 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CHITTENDEN-ROBINSON biplane No.l (J.P. Chittenden and L.H. Robinson, Chiswick, London W)
This was a single-seat, pusher, canard biplane built in 1909, and was fitted with biplane control surfaces at the front and rested on a tricycle undercarriage.
This was a single-seat, pusher, canard biplane built in 1909, and was fitted with biplane control surfaces at the front and rested on a tricycle undercarriage.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CHITTENDEN-ROBINSON biplane No.2
The second CR biplane was a single-seat tractor with uncovered fuselage structure. The wings, of two and a half bays, were parallel with square tips and with single acting ailerons hinged behind the top wings. In a letter to Flight, 19 November 1910 (p.960), Robinson said the machine had not flown owing to the limited space at the ground, although it had lifted some eighteen inches from the ground during tests.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled driving a 7ft diameter Lascelles propeller.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 4ft
The second CR biplane was a single-seat tractor with uncovered fuselage structure. The wings, of two and a half bays, were parallel with square tips and with single acting ailerons hinged behind the top wings. In a letter to Flight, 19 November 1910 (p.960), Robinson said the machine had not flown owing to the limited space at the ground, although it had lifted some eighteen inches from the ground during tests.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled driving a 7ft diameter Lascelles propeller.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 4ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CHITTENDEN-ROBINSON (SEYMOUR) monoplane
This single-seater tractor monoplane was built at Chiswick for A.W. Seymour, Motor and Aeronautical Engineers of Rugby, in which name it was hoped to continue the business which seemingly did not happen.
Power: 40hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type radial driving a 7ft diameter Weiss propeller.
This single-seater tractor monoplane was built at Chiswick for A.W. Seymour, Motor and Aeronautical Engineers of Rugby, in which name it was hoped to continue the business which seemingly did not happen.
Power: 40hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type radial driving a 7ft diameter Weiss propeller.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
T.W.K. CLARKE & Co. (14 Union St., later at Crown Works, 22a High St. Kingston-on-Thames and also High St., Hampton Wick, Kingston Bridge)
T.W.K. Clarke was very active from about 1906 in model making and flying, and, having a learned approach to the problems of flight, gave a number of lectures on the subject. His business originally sold models and materials and progressed to full size gliders. Later, powered machines were built, mainly to other people's designs, and propellers were a specialty. He advertised gliders from ?40 and aeroplanes from ?200, less engine, in 1909 and although the quality of the company's products was highly praised, there is evidence of only a few machines being constructed. There was little publicity given to clients' machines which may account for the few types recorded.
From at least September 1911 to February 1913 he operated from Crown Works, the original boathouse of Alfred Burgoine, but when he moved to Hampton Wick the company appears to have supplied materials, components and models only. It is understood that Clarke joined the staff at Farnborough during the war. The premises at Kingston have long since disappeared.
CLARKE biplane glider 1906-1907
This rather frail-looking biplane was originally fitted with a plain rectangular front elevator but later triangular extensions were added. It appears that a launching rail was first tried, but later testing was carried out as a kite, before Clarke himself accomplished glides. These took place on Cooper's Hill, now known as Telegraph Hill, near Manor Rd. South, Hinchley Wood, at the time when this was an open area. Subsequent trials took place near Aldershot.
Data
Span upper 39ft
Span lower 31ft
Chord 5ft 3in
CLARKE biplane glider 1909-1910
This equal span biplane with tail mounted elevators and rudder was probably inspired by one of the Chanute types. The operator rested on pads under his arms, on the rails of the main frame, and stood in the cutaway in the center section of the bottom plane and could perhaps transfer his weight to the rear spar when in flight. Two levers controlled the rudder and elevators, which could also be warped independently.
The glider was first shown at the Stanley Show at the Agricultural Hall, Islington in November 1909 and has survived in the Science Museum's National Collection. It has recently been exhibited at the RAF Museum, Hendon.
Data
Span 22ft
Chord 3ft 9in
Length 10ft
CLARKE glider 1910
A simple tailless glider was designed by Clarke especially for The Aero, which published working drawings on 12 December 1910 to enable their readers to build the machine. It was an equal span biplane with a forward mounted elevator earned on double booms. There was no fin or rudder and no ailerons or provision for wing warping.
The aviator picked up the glider and ran down a hill with it until flying speed was reached. He then lifted himself bodily on to the machine with his feet on the skids. His right hand operated the elevator by means of a cable mounted on a wing strut.
Data
Span 24ft
Chord 4ft 3 in
Length 14ft lin
Height 5ft 11 in
Weight c. 120lb
CLARKE monoplane glider 1918
During 1918 a tailless monoplane glider with considerable sweep-back and tip mounted ailerons was photographed in the Farnborough area. It is not known if this had official backing or was a private venture and may even have been a survivor from Clarke's prewar activities.
T.W.K. Clarke was very active from about 1906 in model making and flying, and, having a learned approach to the problems of flight, gave a number of lectures on the subject. His business originally sold models and materials and progressed to full size gliders. Later, powered machines were built, mainly to other people's designs, and propellers were a specialty. He advertised gliders from ?40 and aeroplanes from ?200, less engine, in 1909 and although the quality of the company's products was highly praised, there is evidence of only a few machines being constructed. There was little publicity given to clients' machines which may account for the few types recorded.
From at least September 1911 to February 1913 he operated from Crown Works, the original boathouse of Alfred Burgoine, but when he moved to Hampton Wick the company appears to have supplied materials, components and models only. It is understood that Clarke joined the staff at Farnborough during the war. The premises at Kingston have long since disappeared.
CLARKE biplane glider 1906-1907
This rather frail-looking biplane was originally fitted with a plain rectangular front elevator but later triangular extensions were added. It appears that a launching rail was first tried, but later testing was carried out as a kite, before Clarke himself accomplished glides. These took place on Cooper's Hill, now known as Telegraph Hill, near Manor Rd. South, Hinchley Wood, at the time when this was an open area. Subsequent trials took place near Aldershot.
Data
Span upper 39ft
Span lower 31ft
Chord 5ft 3in
CLARKE biplane glider 1909-1910
This equal span biplane with tail mounted elevators and rudder was probably inspired by one of the Chanute types. The operator rested on pads under his arms, on the rails of the main frame, and stood in the cutaway in the center section of the bottom plane and could perhaps transfer his weight to the rear spar when in flight. Two levers controlled the rudder and elevators, which could also be warped independently.
The glider was first shown at the Stanley Show at the Agricultural Hall, Islington in November 1909 and has survived in the Science Museum's National Collection. It has recently been exhibited at the RAF Museum, Hendon.
Data
Span 22ft
Chord 3ft 9in
Length 10ft
CLARKE glider 1910
A simple tailless glider was designed by Clarke especially for The Aero, which published working drawings on 12 December 1910 to enable their readers to build the machine. It was an equal span biplane with a forward mounted elevator earned on double booms. There was no fin or rudder and no ailerons or provision for wing warping.
The aviator picked up the glider and ran down a hill with it until flying speed was reached. He then lifted himself bodily on to the machine with his feet on the skids. His right hand operated the elevator by means of a cable mounted on a wing strut.
Data
Span 24ft
Chord 4ft 3 in
Length 14ft lin
Height 5ft 11 in
Weight c. 120lb
CLARKE monoplane glider 1918
During 1918 a tailless monoplane glider with considerable sweep-back and tip mounted ailerons was photographed in the Farnborough area. It is not known if this had official backing or was a private venture and may even have been a survivor from Clarke's prewar activities.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CLARKE-WRIGHT glider
This biplane glider was ordered by Alec Ogilvie and his partner, T.P. Seawright, in order to obtain practice before delivery of a Short-Wright biplane. Delivery took place in August 1909, after only four weeks under construction and gliding took place at Camber Sands thereafter. The design was based on the Wright No.3 glider, but with a biplane front elevator with fixed fin and upright seating. Launching was by weight and pylon as with the Wright machine. A glide of 343 yards was the most achieved.
Data
Span 32ft 8in
Area 318 sq ft
Length 18ft
OGILVIE & SEAWRIGHT glider (Alec Ogilvie and T.P. Seawright, Finchley, London)
A quadruplane glider was constructed in 1908 by the partners. It was fitted with a four wheeled undercarriage and was towed behind a car. It apparently came to grief when the tow rope broke, when the machine was at a height of thirty feet, piloted by Ogilvie's brother.
The following year Ogilvie bought a Wright type glider from T. W.K. Clarke and a Wright aircraft from Short Brothers.
This biplane glider was ordered by Alec Ogilvie and his partner, T.P. Seawright, in order to obtain practice before delivery of a Short-Wright biplane. Delivery took place in August 1909, after only four weeks under construction and gliding took place at Camber Sands thereafter. The design was based on the Wright No.3 glider, but with a biplane front elevator with fixed fin and upright seating. Launching was by weight and pylon as with the Wright machine. A glide of 343 yards was the most achieved.
Data
Span 32ft 8in
Area 318 sq ft
Length 18ft
OGILVIE & SEAWRIGHT glider (Alec Ogilvie and T.P. Seawright, Finchley, London)
A quadruplane glider was constructed in 1908 by the partners. It was fitted with a four wheeled undercarriage and was towed behind a car. It apparently came to grief when the tow rope broke, when the machine was at a height of thirty feet, piloted by Ogilvie's brother.
The following year Ogilvie bought a Wright type glider from T. W.K. Clarke and a Wright aircraft from Short Brothers.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CLARKE monoplane
This is the only Clarke powered aircraft of which information exists, as it was described in The Aeronautical Journal of October 1910, having won a prize for its design in a competition. It was for Clarke's own use, and was reported to be nearly ready for trial, probably at Brooklands. No reports of trials or successful flights appeared. The machine was a canard with a monoplane foreplane serving as elevator and with a front mounted rudder. Lateral control was by warping the wing.
Power: 25/30hp Thames four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled driving a 7ft 6in diameter Clarke propeller.
Data
Span 30ft
Foreplane Span 14ft
Mean chord 5ft
Mean foreplane chord 3ft 6in
Area 150 sq ft
Foreplane area 50 sq ft
Length 20ft
Weight allup 750 lb
CLARKE double triplane
This machine, with front elevator and biplane tail, was under construction in September 1911 when P.K. Turner of The Aeroplane inspected the Kingston works. No further reports of its existence can be traced.
This is the only Clarke powered aircraft of which information exists, as it was described in The Aeronautical Journal of October 1910, having won a prize for its design in a competition. It was for Clarke's own use, and was reported to be nearly ready for trial, probably at Brooklands. No reports of trials or successful flights appeared. The machine was a canard with a monoplane foreplane serving as elevator and with a front mounted rudder. Lateral control was by warping the wing.
Power: 25/30hp Thames four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled driving a 7ft 6in diameter Clarke propeller.
Data
Span 30ft
Foreplane Span 14ft
Mean chord 5ft
Mean foreplane chord 3ft 6in
Area 150 sq ft
Foreplane area 50 sq ft
Length 20ft
Weight allup 750 lb
CLARKE double triplane
This machine, with front elevator and biplane tail, was under construction in September 1911 when P.K. Turner of The Aeroplane inspected the Kingston works. No further reports of its existence can be traced.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CLAYTON Amphibious Flyer (CD. Clayton and Commercial Aero Club)
C.D. Clayton designed a direct lift flyer and floating aircraft to carry three or more persons and which would rise from water vertically.
The machine was a biplane and had four pairs of motors which powered eight aerial wheel-lifting propellers which gave direct lift and also a forward propulsive thrust.
The Flyer was to have been built in cooperation with the Commercial Aero Club and a scale model was completed; nothing further is known of this project.
C.D. Clayton designed a direct lift flyer and floating aircraft to carry three or more persons and which would rise from water vertically.
The machine was a biplane and had four pairs of motors which powered eight aerial wheel-lifting propellers which gave direct lift and also a forward propulsive thrust.
The Flyer was to have been built in cooperation with the Commercial Aero Club and a scale model was completed; nothing further is known of this project.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CLEVELAND biplane (J. Cleveland Jones, Newcastle-on-Tyne, and T. Taylor, Pelaw, Co. Durham)
This was a tractor biplane with an uncovered, square section, wooden girder fuselage, tapering in both planes to a vertical post at the rear. The forward bays back to the pilot's seat were cross braced with steel tubes, aft of which cable bracing was employed. The sternpost supported a biplane tail with hinged elevators and twin, square shaped, all moving rudders between the tips of the fixed tailplanes. The undercarriage consisted of pairs of separate vee shaped units made from streamlined section steel tube and aluminum sockets, braced by cables. Twin skids with upturned tips carried pairs of wheels on axles sprung by flexible bands. The engine was mounted low down in the front of the fuselage and drove a two-bladed propeller by chain at about half engine speed. Long shallow radiators were mounted below the top longerons.
The wings, which had marked camber, were built with the front spar and interplane struts along the leading edge. Three pairs of interplane struts were provided, dividing the wing structure into two outboard bays of equal size, with a smaller center section bay. Ailerons were fitted to both top and bottom wings which were of the single acting type.
The Cleveland biplane, which was designed by Jones and built by Taylor, was completed but there were no reports of tests or of successful flights.
Power: 35hp Thames four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled, driving a two-bladed propeller by chain reduction gear (2:1 approx.)
Data
Span 30ft
Length 26ft
Weight 800 lb
This was a tractor biplane with an uncovered, square section, wooden girder fuselage, tapering in both planes to a vertical post at the rear. The forward bays back to the pilot's seat were cross braced with steel tubes, aft of which cable bracing was employed. The sternpost supported a biplane tail with hinged elevators and twin, square shaped, all moving rudders between the tips of the fixed tailplanes. The undercarriage consisted of pairs of separate vee shaped units made from streamlined section steel tube and aluminum sockets, braced by cables. Twin skids with upturned tips carried pairs of wheels on axles sprung by flexible bands. The engine was mounted low down in the front of the fuselage and drove a two-bladed propeller by chain at about half engine speed. Long shallow radiators were mounted below the top longerons.
The wings, which had marked camber, were built with the front spar and interplane struts along the leading edge. Three pairs of interplane struts were provided, dividing the wing structure into two outboard bays of equal size, with a smaller center section bay. Ailerons were fitted to both top and bottom wings which were of the single acting type.
The Cleveland biplane, which was designed by Jones and built by Taylor, was completed but there were no reports of tests or of successful flights.
Power: 35hp Thames four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled, driving a two-bladed propeller by chain reduction gear (2:1 approx.)
Data
Span 30ft
Length 26ft
Weight 800 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CLOUT helicopter (George Clout, Durrington, near Worthing, Sussex)
This machine, for which patent application No.13 075/1903 was made, was offered to the War Office, presumably for observation purposes and was abandoned after lack of interest.
The fuselage was a tubular structure with a circular wooden frame on top at the front. On this were mounted the motor, triangular wings and two large fanlike propellers, the whole being free to rotate on the mounting ring. Control was by altering the balance of the car and by the use of 'the steering tail'. The frame of the fuselage could be 'enveloped in descent, converting it into a 13 ft diameter parachute' in an emergency. The photograph shows a scale model built of oak, bamboo and steel tube.
Power: 3.75hp
Data
Rotating wings 30ft diameter
Propellers 10ft diameter
Weight 350 lb
Aircraft Annual 1968 (p45) &1970 (p623)
This machine, for which patent application No.13 075/1903 was made, was offered to the War Office, presumably for observation purposes and was abandoned after lack of interest.
The fuselage was a tubular structure with a circular wooden frame on top at the front. On this were mounted the motor, triangular wings and two large fanlike propellers, the whole being free to rotate on the mounting ring. Control was by altering the balance of the car and by the use of 'the steering tail'. The frame of the fuselage could be 'enveloped in descent, converting it into a 13 ft diameter parachute' in an emergency. The photograph shows a scale model built of oak, bamboo and steel tube.
Power: 3.75hp
Data
Rotating wings 30ft diameter
Propellers 10ft diameter
Weight 350 lb
Aircraft Annual 1968 (p45) &1970 (p623)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CODY AIRCRAFT
Samuel Franklin Cody, real name Cowdery, was engaged by the Army's Balloon School, and based with the Balloon Factory at Aldershot as Chief Kiting Instructor in February 1905. A set of his kites had been ordered by the War Office, and these had been made by Cody in his workshop at the Crystal Palace. He had already supplied four sets to the Admiralty, which were also made there or at his earlier premises at Alexandra Palace.
During 1905 the Balloon Factory moved to Farnborough and Cody continued his work there although he retained his own premises at the Crystal Palace, where he constructed and tested a large kite like glider. This was moved to Aldershot and later to Farnborough, where it was flown successfully until September, when it crashed heavily, seriously injuring his son Vivian. The method of operation was to fly it as a kite to the required height and the pilot, lying prone on the lower wing, controlled the resulting glide to earth.
There followed a period of effort with the Nulli Secundus airship before the next heavier than air machine appeared. This was the Motor Kite, and was generally operated on a wire between poles, although it may also have been flown freely.
<...>
CODY biplane glider
In 1905 Cody built this large glider, which had kite like construction and was designed to be easily transportable. It was subject to a number of changes in the course of its use until September when it crashed, badly injuring Vivian Cody.
The basic strength of the glider was provided by two 26ft lengths of bamboo, joined at the center, which could be separated to collapse the wings, together with six 10ft removable vertical poles. The outlines of the wings were encircled by cables which braced the fabric when the machine was assembled. The vertical struts fitted into pockets, forming fins above and below the wings and the central spar fitted into triangular wingtip panels, and with bracing wires in each bay, formed a rigid but extremely light structure when assembled. A tailplane and rudder were fitted and, at one stage, a forward elevator. Diamond shaped ailerons were fitted below the wing, later above the top wing, and may have been operated as elevators also. The pilot lay in a cradle in a cutout in the lower center section operating the control surfaces by cords.
In addition to Cody and his sons, a number of Army men flew the glider when trials took place at the Long Valley, Aldershot.
Data
Span 51ft
Area 807 sq ft
Weight 116lb
CODY Motor-Kite biplane
After the airship Nulli Secundus was deflated in August 1907, Cody used the redundant tail surfaces and incorporated them into a sesquiplane with boxkite center section. Bamboo booms extended aft to carry twin vertical fins with a warpable horizontal tail between. The undercarriage consisted of two bicycle wheels and a continuous curved tail-skid between the booms. Single interplane struts passed through the top wing to form kingposts for bracing wires. The engine, mounted in front of the center section drove a pusher propeller by belt and a long shaft. In this form it was tested running along a wire strung between two poles with the wing warping controlled by ropes from the ground. Subsequently front outriggers with biplane elevators and a prone pilot position, with the controls operated by cords, were provided. In this condition it is possible that Cody raised the Motor-Kite a few inches from the ground for very short distances in the vicinity of the Factory.
Power: 12-15hp Buchet three-cylinder fantype air-cooled radial driving a 8ft diameter metal propeller.
Data
Span 40ft approx.
Width of center section 12ft between wing panels
CODY biplane glider
In October 1907 the War Office approved an alternative to the Dunne machine to be manufactured at Farnborough. To test features for the new machine, Cody was empowered to make a simple glider of 36ft wingspan, within a cost limit of ?50. The glider was similar in layout to the Wright biplane, but avoided the simultaneous wing warping and rudder control, which was the basis of the Wright brother's claim to originality. The machine was flown as a kite with control of warping by wires and bridle from the ground.
Samuel Franklin Cody, real name Cowdery, was engaged by the Army's Balloon School, and based with the Balloon Factory at Aldershot as Chief Kiting Instructor in February 1905. A set of his kites had been ordered by the War Office, and these had been made by Cody in his workshop at the Crystal Palace. He had already supplied four sets to the Admiralty, which were also made there or at his earlier premises at Alexandra Palace.
During 1905 the Balloon Factory moved to Farnborough and Cody continued his work there although he retained his own premises at the Crystal Palace, where he constructed and tested a large kite like glider. This was moved to Aldershot and later to Farnborough, where it was flown successfully until September, when it crashed heavily, seriously injuring his son Vivian. The method of operation was to fly it as a kite to the required height and the pilot, lying prone on the lower wing, controlled the resulting glide to earth.
There followed a period of effort with the Nulli Secundus airship before the next heavier than air machine appeared. This was the Motor Kite, and was generally operated on a wire between poles, although it may also have been flown freely.
<...>
CODY biplane glider
In 1905 Cody built this large glider, which had kite like construction and was designed to be easily transportable. It was subject to a number of changes in the course of its use until September when it crashed, badly injuring Vivian Cody.
The basic strength of the glider was provided by two 26ft lengths of bamboo, joined at the center, which could be separated to collapse the wings, together with six 10ft removable vertical poles. The outlines of the wings were encircled by cables which braced the fabric when the machine was assembled. The vertical struts fitted into pockets, forming fins above and below the wings and the central spar fitted into triangular wingtip panels, and with bracing wires in each bay, formed a rigid but extremely light structure when assembled. A tailplane and rudder were fitted and, at one stage, a forward elevator. Diamond shaped ailerons were fitted below the wing, later above the top wing, and may have been operated as elevators also. The pilot lay in a cradle in a cutout in the lower center section operating the control surfaces by cords.
In addition to Cody and his sons, a number of Army men flew the glider when trials took place at the Long Valley, Aldershot.
Data
Span 51ft
Area 807 sq ft
Weight 116lb
CODY Motor-Kite biplane
After the airship Nulli Secundus was deflated in August 1907, Cody used the redundant tail surfaces and incorporated them into a sesquiplane with boxkite center section. Bamboo booms extended aft to carry twin vertical fins with a warpable horizontal tail between. The undercarriage consisted of two bicycle wheels and a continuous curved tail-skid between the booms. Single interplane struts passed through the top wing to form kingposts for bracing wires. The engine, mounted in front of the center section drove a pusher propeller by belt and a long shaft. In this form it was tested running along a wire strung between two poles with the wing warping controlled by ropes from the ground. Subsequently front outriggers with biplane elevators and a prone pilot position, with the controls operated by cords, were provided. In this condition it is possible that Cody raised the Motor-Kite a few inches from the ground for very short distances in the vicinity of the Factory.
Power: 12-15hp Buchet three-cylinder fantype air-cooled radial driving a 8ft diameter metal propeller.
Data
Span 40ft approx.
Width of center section 12ft between wing panels
CODY biplane glider
In October 1907 the War Office approved an alternative to the Dunne machine to be manufactured at Farnborough. To test features for the new machine, Cody was empowered to make a simple glider of 36ft wingspan, within a cost limit of ?50. The glider was similar in layout to the Wright biplane, but avoided the simultaneous wing warping and rudder control, which was the basis of the Wright brother's claim to originality. The machine was flown as a kite with control of warping by wires and bridle from the ground.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CODY AIRCRAFT
<...>
Thereafter Cody turned his attention mainly to the aeroplane which became British Army Aeroplane No. 1 in which he made the first officially recognized flight of a powered heavier-than-air machine in Britain on 16 October 1908.
The government reviewed the current state of aeronautics with economies in mind and decided to discontinue work on aircraft at Farnborough, as a consequence of which Cody and his contemporary in the field, Lt. J.W. Dunne, were discharged at the end of March 1909. Cody was allowed to keep his aeroplane, but not the engine, although this was loaned to him for a period of time and he was allowed to build a shed on Laffan's Plain on military ground and to operate in the area. British Army Aeroplane No. 1 went through many changes and some crashes during its life and in Cody's ownership became known as Cody No.l. It was followed by six more aeroplanes of five basic types, although most were modified in various ways in the course of their lives. Cody designed and redesigned his aircraft, experimenting and improvising and showing great ingenuity and determination, oft en in most difficult circumstances. Successive types up to No.VI all displayed improvements, which enabled Cody to win a number of prizes, including that for the Military Trials of 1912, with No.V, of which two were built and were the only aircraft that Cody sold. His last machine, No.VI, was that which carried him and his passenger to their deaths on 7 August 1913. At the time Cody was planning to build a machine for a transatlantic flight.
The type and subtype numbers used are a convenient means of identification and may not have been in use when the aircraft were current.
CODY British Army Aeroplane No.I and IA
Construction of this machine began in October 1907 and it was substantially complete in the Airship Shed, minus a suitable engine, by January 1908. The Antoinette engine did not become available until July, and in the meantime some minor work was carried out, including fitting a temporary source of power, perhaps an electric motor, to activate the propellers and their drive. For a time, from May, the machine was transferred to a small shed to allow work to proceed in secure conditions. By September the aircraft was back in the Airship Shed and the engine installation was complete enabling it to appear outside for engine and taxiing tests on the 19 September 1908. From this date several hops and minor damage occurred, but on 16 October 1908 a sustained flight of 1,390ft, reaching a height of some 30ft, was achieved. Although this resulted in a crash, with considerable damage, this is officially recognized as the first powered, sustained and controlled flight in Britain.
The BAA No.I was basically a twin pusher biplane with front elevator, a boom mounted tail rudder and wingtip ailerons near the leading edge. The pilot was seated behind the engine and the machine rested on a two wheel, narrow track undercarriage with a front buffer wheel and a tail-wheel, together with wheels at the wingtips. A flexible triangular panel, 'the fantail', extended from the center section of the top wing to the top of the rudder. A further addition was a 'top rudder' above the wing after which the ailerons were discarded. The radiators were moved outboard to the first interplane struts. In this condition the first flight was accomplished.
Changes were made during the rebuild, and the aircraft appeared again as No. 1A on 9 January 1909 to fly with streamers attached to check the airflow. Further damage occurred on 20 January 1909 after a flight of 1,200ft but tests resumed again from mid-February until the end of March, when the machine, less engine, was given to Cody upon his discharge from the Factory.
When the machine emerged at the beginning of the year the 'top rudder', introduced to provide lateral control, and the 'fantail' were removed. The front elevator had been increased in span to 25ft, and in addition ailerons were mounted outboard of this, supported on triangular bamboo booms back to the wingtips. The radiators were moved aft and changes were made to strengthen the undercarriage and wingtip wheels. The machine was lengthened by extending the rear boom. In this condition, a forty yard flight, when a height of 10ft resulted in a stall and a heavy landing, proving the center of gravity being too far aft.
Before its next appearance on 20 January 1909 the ailerons were transferred to trail on struts mounted on the rear interplane struts and braced by wires. The 'top rudder' had earlier been mounted within the front booms. However, a short flight resulted in a crash when the front booms folded backwards. Changes were made during the subsequent repair, the ailerons being removed and made into a biplane tail, fitted within the rear booms. Triangular flaps were fitted to the front lower wingtips to act as 'spoilers', probably in conjunction with warping. The Factory drawings of March 1909 show most of these changes and illustrate the general configuration of the aircraft when presented to Cody.
Power: 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving twin pusher propellers by flat belts.
Data No.I
Span 52ft
Chord 7ft
Gap 8ft
Area 790 sq ft
Length 32ft
Height 17ft
Weight 2,260 lb
Weight allup 2,540 lb
Speed 40 mph
Data No.IA
Area 857 sq ft including ailerons
Length 44ft
Height 17ft
CODY biplane No.lB and 1C
No.IB. After March 1909, when the aeroplane became his property, Cody continued with its development, still using the Antoinette engine on loan and with the machine still housed at the Factory until his shed on Laffan's Plain was ready in May. He had earlier removed Capper's biplane tail, and on 14 May 1909 was testing a new rudder mounted above the front elevator, instead of within the booms, coupled to twin rear rudders. Lateral control was still being resolved by repositioning the ailerons; at one stage they were again mounted on the rear outboard interplane struts with wire bracings, and also on booms trailing behind the wings on the second and outboard struts.
Cody flew for over a mile at up to 30ft high in the morning, but crashed in the afternoon while attempting to repeat the performance. In the course of being rebuilt the machine reverted to a single rear rudder and the tailwheel was replaced by a long curved wooden skid referred to as the 'kangaroo tail'. Shortly after the front elevator was increased in span and divided into two separate flaps, capable of differential movement, to provide lateral control.
In June Cody flew distances up to two miles, in July four possibly six miles, and was contemplating a more powerful engine.
No.IC. At this stage a major reconstruction of the aircraft took place with the Antoinette being replaced by a French-made ENV and the pilot's position being moved to in front of the engine. The propellers, now driven by chains, were lowered and the radiators moved to the front of the engine.
Cody flew the reconstructed aircraft on 11 August 1909 for the first time, and considered it a great improvement. A seat was arranged behind the pilot's position and on 14 August 1909 he carried his first passenger. On the 8 September 1909 he flew for 1hr 3min, covering forty miles and reaching a height of 600ft, a record for a flight in Britain.
Cody took the machine to the Doncaster Meeting in October, but after one short flight it overturned on soft ground and was damaged. Cody, now a British subject, was forestalled in his entry for the Daily Mail ?1,000 prize for a circular flight of one mile, which he could easily have achieved, by Moore-Brabazon on 30 October 1909.
He subsequently moved to Aintree to compete for the Hartley prize of ?1,000 for a flight from Liverpool to Manchester, in which he was unsuccessful after several abortive attempts. He abandoned further flights with the onset of winter, and the last use of this machine was made in early January.
At the Doncaster Meeting the machine had acquired the nickname 'Cathedral'.
Power:
No.IB 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving twin propellers by flat belt.
No.IC 60-80hp ENV type C eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving twin propellers by chains, French-made to British parent company's design.
Data
Span 52ft
Length 44ft
Chord 7ft
Area 790 sq ft plus
67 sq ft when ailerons fitted
Height 13ft
Gap 9ft
Weight 2,200 lb
Weight allup 2,500lb
<...>
Thereafter Cody turned his attention mainly to the aeroplane which became British Army Aeroplane No. 1 in which he made the first officially recognized flight of a powered heavier-than-air machine in Britain on 16 October 1908.
The government reviewed the current state of aeronautics with economies in mind and decided to discontinue work on aircraft at Farnborough, as a consequence of which Cody and his contemporary in the field, Lt. J.W. Dunne, were discharged at the end of March 1909. Cody was allowed to keep his aeroplane, but not the engine, although this was loaned to him for a period of time and he was allowed to build a shed on Laffan's Plain on military ground and to operate in the area. British Army Aeroplane No. 1 went through many changes and some crashes during its life and in Cody's ownership became known as Cody No.l. It was followed by six more aeroplanes of five basic types, although most were modified in various ways in the course of their lives. Cody designed and redesigned his aircraft, experimenting and improvising and showing great ingenuity and determination, oft en in most difficult circumstances. Successive types up to No.VI all displayed improvements, which enabled Cody to win a number of prizes, including that for the Military Trials of 1912, with No.V, of which two were built and were the only aircraft that Cody sold. His last machine, No.VI, was that which carried him and his passenger to their deaths on 7 August 1913. At the time Cody was planning to build a machine for a transatlantic flight.
The type and subtype numbers used are a convenient means of identification and may not have been in use when the aircraft were current.
CODY British Army Aeroplane No.I and IA
Construction of this machine began in October 1907 and it was substantially complete in the Airship Shed, minus a suitable engine, by January 1908. The Antoinette engine did not become available until July, and in the meantime some minor work was carried out, including fitting a temporary source of power, perhaps an electric motor, to activate the propellers and their drive. For a time, from May, the machine was transferred to a small shed to allow work to proceed in secure conditions. By September the aircraft was back in the Airship Shed and the engine installation was complete enabling it to appear outside for engine and taxiing tests on the 19 September 1908. From this date several hops and minor damage occurred, but on 16 October 1908 a sustained flight of 1,390ft, reaching a height of some 30ft, was achieved. Although this resulted in a crash, with considerable damage, this is officially recognized as the first powered, sustained and controlled flight in Britain.
The BAA No.I was basically a twin pusher biplane with front elevator, a boom mounted tail rudder and wingtip ailerons near the leading edge. The pilot was seated behind the engine and the machine rested on a two wheel, narrow track undercarriage with a front buffer wheel and a tail-wheel, together with wheels at the wingtips. A flexible triangular panel, 'the fantail', extended from the center section of the top wing to the top of the rudder. A further addition was a 'top rudder' above the wing after which the ailerons were discarded. The radiators were moved outboard to the first interplane struts. In this condition the first flight was accomplished.
Changes were made during the rebuild, and the aircraft appeared again as No. 1A on 9 January 1909 to fly with streamers attached to check the airflow. Further damage occurred on 20 January 1909 after a flight of 1,200ft but tests resumed again from mid-February until the end of March, when the machine, less engine, was given to Cody upon his discharge from the Factory.
When the machine emerged at the beginning of the year the 'top rudder', introduced to provide lateral control, and the 'fantail' were removed. The front elevator had been increased in span to 25ft, and in addition ailerons were mounted outboard of this, supported on triangular bamboo booms back to the wingtips. The radiators were moved aft and changes were made to strengthen the undercarriage and wingtip wheels. The machine was lengthened by extending the rear boom. In this condition, a forty yard flight, when a height of 10ft resulted in a stall and a heavy landing, proving the center of gravity being too far aft.
Before its next appearance on 20 January 1909 the ailerons were transferred to trail on struts mounted on the rear interplane struts and braced by wires. The 'top rudder' had earlier been mounted within the front booms. However, a short flight resulted in a crash when the front booms folded backwards. Changes were made during the subsequent repair, the ailerons being removed and made into a biplane tail, fitted within the rear booms. Triangular flaps were fitted to the front lower wingtips to act as 'spoilers', probably in conjunction with warping. The Factory drawings of March 1909 show most of these changes and illustrate the general configuration of the aircraft when presented to Cody.
Power: 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving twin pusher propellers by flat belts.
Data No.I
Span 52ft
Chord 7ft
Gap 8ft
Area 790 sq ft
Length 32ft
Height 17ft
Weight 2,260 lb
Weight allup 2,540 lb
Speed 40 mph
Data No.IA
Area 857 sq ft including ailerons
Length 44ft
Height 17ft
CODY biplane No.lB and 1C
No.IB. After March 1909, when the aeroplane became his property, Cody continued with its development, still using the Antoinette engine on loan and with the machine still housed at the Factory until his shed on Laffan's Plain was ready in May. He had earlier removed Capper's biplane tail, and on 14 May 1909 was testing a new rudder mounted above the front elevator, instead of within the booms, coupled to twin rear rudders. Lateral control was still being resolved by repositioning the ailerons; at one stage they were again mounted on the rear outboard interplane struts with wire bracings, and also on booms trailing behind the wings on the second and outboard struts.
Cody flew for over a mile at up to 30ft high in the morning, but crashed in the afternoon while attempting to repeat the performance. In the course of being rebuilt the machine reverted to a single rear rudder and the tailwheel was replaced by a long curved wooden skid referred to as the 'kangaroo tail'. Shortly after the front elevator was increased in span and divided into two separate flaps, capable of differential movement, to provide lateral control.
In June Cody flew distances up to two miles, in July four possibly six miles, and was contemplating a more powerful engine.
No.IC. At this stage a major reconstruction of the aircraft took place with the Antoinette being replaced by a French-made ENV and the pilot's position being moved to in front of the engine. The propellers, now driven by chains, were lowered and the radiators moved to the front of the engine.
Cody flew the reconstructed aircraft on 11 August 1909 for the first time, and considered it a great improvement. A seat was arranged behind the pilot's position and on 14 August 1909 he carried his first passenger. On the 8 September 1909 he flew for 1hr 3min, covering forty miles and reaching a height of 600ft, a record for a flight in Britain.
Cody took the machine to the Doncaster Meeting in October, but after one short flight it overturned on soft ground and was damaged. Cody, now a British subject, was forestalled in his entry for the Daily Mail ?1,000 prize for a circular flight of one mile, which he could easily have achieved, by Moore-Brabazon on 30 October 1909.
He subsequently moved to Aintree to compete for the Hartley prize of ?1,000 for a flight from Liverpool to Manchester, in which he was unsuccessful after several abortive attempts. He abandoned further flights with the onset of winter, and the last use of this machine was made in early January.
At the Doncaster Meeting the machine had acquired the nickname 'Cathedral'.
Power:
No.IB 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving twin propellers by flat belt.
No.IC 60-80hp ENV type C eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving twin propellers by chains, French-made to British parent company's design.
Data
Span 52ft
Length 44ft
Chord 7ft
Area 790 sq ft plus
67 sq ft when ailerons fitted
Height 13ft
Gap 9ft
Weight 2,200 lb
Weight allup 2,500lb
Cody British Army Aeroplane No. I B as it appeared after reconstruction after the removal of its biplane tail and the installation of mid-gap ailerons on 14 May 1909.
Cody No.I C. Although suffering a mishap at Doncaster, the much modified machine was flying strongly to the end of 1909.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CODY biplane No.IIA, B, C, D and E (British Michelin Trophy Type)
No.IIA. For 1910 Cody planned a smaller machine with single pusher propeller, but much in the style of the last version of his first machine. He required more power and planned to fit a ten-cylinder 100hp Phoenix rotary engine, which did not materialize. The design was changed to accept two 60hp Green engines, but only one was fitted initially. On its first appearance the radiators were above the engine and no horizontal tail surface was fitted. In this form it flew two circuits of Laffan's Plain on 23 June 1910, at about 50ft but crashed on landing, injuring Cody.
In the course of the rebuild a fixed tailplane was added. Cody took the machine to the Wolverhampton and Bournemouth meetings in June and July, but his flying was limited and no prize money was won. In August he arrived at Lanark with the machine, but he received a second engine on loan from the Green Company. This could not be synchronized, with the other so both were removed. Cody's visit to Lanark was most unsuccessful.
No.IIB His original French ENV was then fitted and this remained in use until late October. During September he carried nine passengers on various flights, flying 113 miles in the first week and 126 miles in the third. On 30 September 1910 he flew for 1hr 15min and then for 50min. The French-made engine could not be used for the Michelin Contest, for which a ?500 prize and trophy were offered. In late October he refitted the Green on a new single mounting and on 4 November 1910 made an attempt lasting 2hr 25min. He then installed a British ENV, which was on loan, in the first week of November, but after a minor accident on 12 November 1910, this was removed and returned to the ENV company.
No.IIC. Cody reverted to a single Green and used this until the end of the year, winning the British Empire Michelin Trophy for a flight of 4hr 47min in a closed circuit, calculated as 185.46 miles, on his third attempt on the last day of the year and of the Contest.
No.IID. Cody exhibited his aircraft at the 1911 Olympia Aero Show, held between 24 March and 1 April. Apart from the various engine changes, to all appearances it had changed very little from its early condition and, by the standards of the day, had proved to be very successful.
The lateral control was by ailerons aided by differential elevators, operated by sideways movement of the control column. A hand-wheel on the column controlled the rudder. The throttle control was by foot pedal. The undercarriage had spring loaded main legs and buffer wheels at the front; the tail-skid was a long wooden 'kangaroo tail' on which the machine normally rested. Cody could see through the honeycomb radiator, and derived warmth from this and small radiators by his feet. A passenger could be carried on a second plough type seat mounted behind and higher than the pilot.
No.IIE. (Omnibus) Cody's earlier Michelin Trophy machine was brought back into use at the end of 1911. It flew fitted with an Austro-Daimler engine giving the power that Cody had long been seeking, on 3 January 1912. Twin booms and tail surfaces, reportedly transferred from No.III, were fitted. The performance of the aircraft was greatly improved and later carried Cody and up to four passengers on agricultural type seats mounted in a line at midgap behind him. The aircraft crashed in April 1912 and was not rebuilt.
Power:
No.IIA, B and C 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a single pusher propeller by Brampton chain. Two engines were fitted briefly but not flown.
No.IIB. 60-80hp ENV Type C eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee, French-made.
60hp ENV Type F eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee, British-made driving a 10ft 2in diameter propeller by Brampton chain.
No.IIE. 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder, inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 46ft (49ft including aileron overhang)
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 540 sq ft
Area front 116 sq ft
elevator
Area ailerons 101 sq ft
Gap 8ft 6in
Length 38ft 6in
No.IIA. For 1910 Cody planned a smaller machine with single pusher propeller, but much in the style of the last version of his first machine. He required more power and planned to fit a ten-cylinder 100hp Phoenix rotary engine, which did not materialize. The design was changed to accept two 60hp Green engines, but only one was fitted initially. On its first appearance the radiators were above the engine and no horizontal tail surface was fitted. In this form it flew two circuits of Laffan's Plain on 23 June 1910, at about 50ft but crashed on landing, injuring Cody.
In the course of the rebuild a fixed tailplane was added. Cody took the machine to the Wolverhampton and Bournemouth meetings in June and July, but his flying was limited and no prize money was won. In August he arrived at Lanark with the machine, but he received a second engine on loan from the Green Company. This could not be synchronized, with the other so both were removed. Cody's visit to Lanark was most unsuccessful.
No.IIB His original French ENV was then fitted and this remained in use until late October. During September he carried nine passengers on various flights, flying 113 miles in the first week and 126 miles in the third. On 30 September 1910 he flew for 1hr 15min and then for 50min. The French-made engine could not be used for the Michelin Contest, for which a ?500 prize and trophy were offered. In late October he refitted the Green on a new single mounting and on 4 November 1910 made an attempt lasting 2hr 25min. He then installed a British ENV, which was on loan, in the first week of November, but after a minor accident on 12 November 1910, this was removed and returned to the ENV company.
No.IIC. Cody reverted to a single Green and used this until the end of the year, winning the British Empire Michelin Trophy for a flight of 4hr 47min in a closed circuit, calculated as 185.46 miles, on his third attempt on the last day of the year and of the Contest.
No.IID. Cody exhibited his aircraft at the 1911 Olympia Aero Show, held between 24 March and 1 April. Apart from the various engine changes, to all appearances it had changed very little from its early condition and, by the standards of the day, had proved to be very successful.
The lateral control was by ailerons aided by differential elevators, operated by sideways movement of the control column. A hand-wheel on the column controlled the rudder. The throttle control was by foot pedal. The undercarriage had spring loaded main legs and buffer wheels at the front; the tail-skid was a long wooden 'kangaroo tail' on which the machine normally rested. Cody could see through the honeycomb radiator, and derived warmth from this and small radiators by his feet. A passenger could be carried on a second plough type seat mounted behind and higher than the pilot.
No.IIE. (Omnibus) Cody's earlier Michelin Trophy machine was brought back into use at the end of 1911. It flew fitted with an Austro-Daimler engine giving the power that Cody had long been seeking, on 3 January 1912. Twin booms and tail surfaces, reportedly transferred from No.III, were fitted. The performance of the aircraft was greatly improved and later carried Cody and up to four passengers on agricultural type seats mounted in a line at midgap behind him. The aircraft crashed in April 1912 and was not rebuilt.
Power:
No.IIA, B and C 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a single pusher propeller by Brampton chain. Two engines were fitted briefly but not flown.
No.IIB. 60-80hp ENV Type C eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee, French-made.
60hp ENV Type F eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee, British-made driving a 10ft 2in diameter propeller by Brampton chain.
No.IIE. 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder, inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 46ft (49ft including aileron overhang)
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 540 sq ft
Area front 116 sq ft
elevator
Area ailerons 101 sq ft
Gap 8ft 6in
Length 38ft 6in
Cody No.IIC and D. The 1910 British Empire Trophy No.l winner with Green engine at Olympia in March 1911.
Cody No.II. This smaller biplane, built for use in 1910, survived until April 1912 in various forms. No.IIb illustrated with British ENV Type F engine.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CODY biplane No.III (Circuit of Britain Type)
Cody's third aircraft was again smaller, but built on similar lines to its predecessor. No ailerons were fitted, lateral control being achieved by the use of wing warping and differential front elevators. An obvious change was the use of twin booms and rudders with fixed circular tailplanes, which could be folded against the mainplanes for storage in the confined space of his shed, now needed to house two aeroplanes. As in his previous aircraft, bamboo was used extensively for the booms and control rods, spruce and hickory being used elsewhere.
The Daily Mail Circuit of Britain Contest started at Brooklands on 22 July 1911 and was over a course of 1,010 miles for a ?1,000 prize. It was won by a Bleriot flown by Lt. Conneau in four days of flying. Cody had problems including poor weather, which extended his time to fourteen days, nevertheless his biplane was the only British-built machine to finish and he was placed fourth. This machine proved to be Cody's most successful aircraft to date and went on to win both of the British Empire Michelin Prizes of 1911.
Trophy No.l. 29 October 1911. 5hr 15min, a flight of 261 1/2 miles, ?500.
Trophy No.2. 11 September 1911. 3hr 6 1/2 min, a circuit of 125 miles at 40mph, ?400.
The machine continued in use for instruction, demonstration and passenger work into 1912, but was crashed badly on 3 June 1912, when being flown by a pupil, Lt. Harvey-Kelly. It was cannibalized to provide parts for a later machine, No.V.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder, inline, water-cooled driving a pusher propeller by chain.
Data
Span 40ft
Area 450 sq ft
Length 30ft
Height lift
Weight 1,750lb
Weight allup 2,500lb
Speed range 40-58 mph
Ceiling 5,000 ft
Range 350 miles
Cody's third aircraft was again smaller, but built on similar lines to its predecessor. No ailerons were fitted, lateral control being achieved by the use of wing warping and differential front elevators. An obvious change was the use of twin booms and rudders with fixed circular tailplanes, which could be folded against the mainplanes for storage in the confined space of his shed, now needed to house two aeroplanes. As in his previous aircraft, bamboo was used extensively for the booms and control rods, spruce and hickory being used elsewhere.
The Daily Mail Circuit of Britain Contest started at Brooklands on 22 July 1911 and was over a course of 1,010 miles for a ?1,000 prize. It was won by a Bleriot flown by Lt. Conneau in four days of flying. Cody had problems including poor weather, which extended his time to fourteen days, nevertheless his biplane was the only British-built machine to finish and he was placed fourth. This machine proved to be Cody's most successful aircraft to date and went on to win both of the British Empire Michelin Prizes of 1911.
Trophy No.l. 29 October 1911. 5hr 15min, a flight of 261 1/2 miles, ?500.
Trophy No.2. 11 September 1911. 3hr 6 1/2 min, a circuit of 125 miles at 40mph, ?400.
The machine continued in use for instruction, demonstration and passenger work into 1912, but was crashed badly on 3 June 1912, when being flown by a pupil, Lt. Harvey-Kelly. It was cannibalized to provide parts for a later machine, No.V.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder, inline, water-cooled driving a pusher propeller by chain.
Data
Span 40ft
Area 450 sq ft
Length 30ft
Height lift
Weight 1,750lb
Weight allup 2,500lb
Speed range 40-58 mph
Ceiling 5,000 ft
Range 350 miles
Cody No.III Circuit of Britain biplane won the British Empire Michelin Trophies Nos.l and 2 of 1912 but was unsuccessful in the circuit contest.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CODY monoplane No.IV
Cody began testing this new machine, intended for entry in the Military Trials, in the middle of June 1912. Its life was brief, however, for on 8 July he was forced to land after the engine failed and in the resulting collision with a cow, the machine was damaged beyond repair.
The aircraft was a shoulder-wing monoplane which rested on a two wheel undercarriage with sprung struts and curved hickory wood struts supporting a central skid with twin front wheels. The skid was extended aft to form a tail support. The front fuselage comprising the engine bay and the side-by-side seating was a spruce structure with cabane for the anchorage of wing bracing wires. The fuselage aft of the cockpit was an unconventional structure of four bamboo longerons, faired with fabric covering tapered to a point. The longerons as they extended aft were splayed out to provide mountings for a fixed cruciform tail, plus pivot points for twin rudders and elevators.
The engine drove, by chain, the propeller mounted above on a shaft at two thirds engine speed. The radiator was mounted in front of the engine, but behind the chain drive. The exhaust was fitted with a silencer, which doubled as a heater and emerged from the top of the starboard fuselage side. Fuel and oil tanks were housed in the decking in front of the cockpit, which had transparent sides. Although the engine was exposed it is probable that cowlings were to be added later.
Lateral control was by wing warping, all control movements being made from a central control column between the two occupants. The elevators were operated by a bamboo rod by fore and aft movement and the rudders by cable by a wheel on the column.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder, inline, water-cooled driving by Brampton chain a 10ft 2in diameter Chauviere propeller at two thirds engine speed.
Data
Span 43ft 6in *44ft
Chord 6ft 9in
Area 260 sq ft
Elevator area 46 sq ft
Rudder area 46 sq ft
Length 37ft *41ft
Height 12ft 6in * 13ft
Weight 2,400 lb
Weight allup 3,100lb
Speed range 58-83 mph
*from other sources
Cody began testing this new machine, intended for entry in the Military Trials, in the middle of June 1912. Its life was brief, however, for on 8 July he was forced to land after the engine failed and in the resulting collision with a cow, the machine was damaged beyond repair.
The aircraft was a shoulder-wing monoplane which rested on a two wheel undercarriage with sprung struts and curved hickory wood struts supporting a central skid with twin front wheels. The skid was extended aft to form a tail support. The front fuselage comprising the engine bay and the side-by-side seating was a spruce structure with cabane for the anchorage of wing bracing wires. The fuselage aft of the cockpit was an unconventional structure of four bamboo longerons, faired with fabric covering tapered to a point. The longerons as they extended aft were splayed out to provide mountings for a fixed cruciform tail, plus pivot points for twin rudders and elevators.
The engine drove, by chain, the propeller mounted above on a shaft at two thirds engine speed. The radiator was mounted in front of the engine, but behind the chain drive. The exhaust was fitted with a silencer, which doubled as a heater and emerged from the top of the starboard fuselage side. Fuel and oil tanks were housed in the decking in front of the cockpit, which had transparent sides. Although the engine was exposed it is probable that cowlings were to be added later.
Lateral control was by wing warping, all control movements being made from a central control column between the two occupants. The elevators were operated by a bamboo rod by fore and aft movement and the rudders by cable by a wheel on the column.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder, inline, water-cooled driving by Brampton chain a 10ft 2in diameter Chauviere propeller at two thirds engine speed.
Data
Span 43ft 6in *44ft
Chord 6ft 9in
Area 260 sq ft
Elevator area 46 sq ft
Rudder area 46 sq ft
Length 37ft *41ft
Height 12ft 6in * 13ft
Weight 2,400 lb
Weight allup 3,100lb
Speed range 58-83 mph
*from other sources
Cody No.IV. The monoplane intended for the Military Trials of 1912 but damaged beyond repair before the competition.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CODY biplane No.VA, B and C (Military Trials Type)
Cody entered both his monoplane and biplane in the Military Trials, but both were damaged about three weeks before the start of the trials. By a great effort he managed to build a new biplane basically using No.III, which had first flown in June 1911, and the engine and parts from the monoplane. He began testing this on 23 July, flying after dusk on some evenings, to have the aircraft ready for the Trials, which began on 4 August, when he flew to Larkhill. He performed so successfully that he was declared the winner of the ?5,000 prize.
Cody's success resulted in a War Office order for this machine, which became RFC No.301, and a similar one, No.304. No.301 broke up in the air on 28 May 1913, and Lt. Rogers-Harrison was killed when the front elevators, dating from June 1911, failed. No.304 served briefly with the RFC, but after being damaged, was passed to the Science Museum in November 1913, where it is still displayed.
Some variations existed between the two machines initially, but later they were made identical. The notable differences included the change from anhedral to dihedral setting of the wings; the placing of the rudders closer together and the raising of the elevators. In appearance the Cody V resembled the Cody III except for the shape of the rudders and tail surfaces. The crew area was partly enclosed with fabric.
After winning the Trials, Cody changed the engine for a 100hp Green and proceeded to win the British Michelin Trophy No.2 of 1912 and a prize of ?600 for a flight of 186 miles in 3hr 26min. After this the Austro-Daimler was reinstalled before the machine was handed over to the RFC at the end of the year. It was exhibited by the War Office at the Olympia Aero Show in February 1913.
The machine was basically a two-seater but four seats were fitted to VA at one time.
Power:
No.VA and B. 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 10ft 4in diameter Cody propeller by Brampton chain at 1.75:1 reduction.
No.VC. 100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 43ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft. 6in.
Wing Area 430 sq ft
Area Elevators 60 sq ft
Rudders 30sq.ft
Length 37ft 9in
Height 11ft 6in
Tail damper planes 10 sq ft
VA&B. Weight 1,850 lb allup 2,850 lb
VC Weight 2,000 lb allup 2,800 lb
Speed range 48-72 mph
Cody entered both his monoplane and biplane in the Military Trials, but both were damaged about three weeks before the start of the trials. By a great effort he managed to build a new biplane basically using No.III, which had first flown in June 1911, and the engine and parts from the monoplane. He began testing this on 23 July, flying after dusk on some evenings, to have the aircraft ready for the Trials, which began on 4 August, when he flew to Larkhill. He performed so successfully that he was declared the winner of the ?5,000 prize.
Cody's success resulted in a War Office order for this machine, which became RFC No.301, and a similar one, No.304. No.301 broke up in the air on 28 May 1913, and Lt. Rogers-Harrison was killed when the front elevators, dating from June 1911, failed. No.304 served briefly with the RFC, but after being damaged, was passed to the Science Museum in November 1913, where it is still displayed.
Some variations existed between the two machines initially, but later they were made identical. The notable differences included the change from anhedral to dihedral setting of the wings; the placing of the rudders closer together and the raising of the elevators. In appearance the Cody V resembled the Cody III except for the shape of the rudders and tail surfaces. The crew area was partly enclosed with fabric.
After winning the Trials, Cody changed the engine for a 100hp Green and proceeded to win the British Michelin Trophy No.2 of 1912 and a prize of ?600 for a flight of 186 miles in 3hr 26min. After this the Austro-Daimler was reinstalled before the machine was handed over to the RFC at the end of the year. It was exhibited by the War Office at the Olympia Aero Show in February 1913.
The machine was basically a two-seater but four seats were fitted to VA at one time.
Power:
No.VA and B. 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 10ft 4in diameter Cody propeller by Brampton chain at 1.75:1 reduction.
No.VC. 100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 43ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft. 6in.
Wing Area 430 sq ft
Area Elevators 60 sq ft
Rudders 30sq.ft
Length 37ft 9in
Height 11ft 6in
Tail damper planes 10 sq ft
VA&B. Weight 1,850 lb allup 2,850 lb
VC Weight 2,000 lb allup 2,800 lb
Speed range 48-72 mph
Cody No.VA and B. The winner of the Military Trials of 1912 became No.301 in the RFC. A second machine No.304 is still on display at the Science Museum.
Cody No.V C was fitted with a 100hp Green engine and then won the British Empire Michelin Trophy No.2 of 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CODY biplane No.VIA and B (Water-plane)
The last Cody aeroplane to be constructed was built to compete in the Daily Mail Seaplane Circuit of Britain, due to start from Calshot in August 1913. It was completed in July and was taken to Eelmoor Flash on the Basingstoke Canal for flotation trials. Thereafter the floats were removed and a wheel undercarriage fitted for flight trials. These included flying the machine to Brooklands on 3 August 1913 for the meeting on Sunday before the Bank Holiday. Cody planned to fly the machine to Calshot on Thursday 7 August for the floats to be fitted. However, in the morning he arranged to take up passengers and while he was flying with W.H.B. Evans, the Hampshire cricket captain, the machine broke up over Ball Hill near Cove and both Cody and his passenger fell to their deaths.
No.VI was the largest Cody aircraft, and had warping wings and a single front elevator. A large diamond shaped rudder pivoted between the booms and carried a small fixed triangular tailplane. Two seats were fitted in tandem, the pilot's controls and the chain driven propeller were similar to those on previous types. An enclosure to protect the crew was provided after the machine's early appearances.
No.VIA The narrow track land undercarriage incorporated a central skid serving as a front buffer and rear support. Sprung skids pivoted at the wing leading edge below the intermediate interplane struts prevented contact of the lower wingtips with the ground.
No.VIB The machine never flew as a seaplane, but the flotation gear consisted of a large three stepped central float with fabric decking. The balancing floats were fitted below the first set of interplane struts. These three floats were made by Harmsworth's Boatyard of Ash Vale, constructors of barges and boats, and were tested by being towed along the canal.
Power: 100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving by chain a 10ft 8in diameter four-bladed Garuda propeller. A four-bladed Integral was due to be fitted.
Data
Span 59ft 6in
Chord 6ft 10in
Gap 8ft
Area 770 sq ft
Area Elevators 75 sq ft
Area Rudders 40 sq ft
Area Damper tailplane 25 sq ft
Length 40ft 9in
Height 12ft 9in
Speed range 45-70 mph
CODY PROJECTS
In 1913 Cody considered establishing his own company for producing aircraft in greater numbers. A catalogue of types was produced in which were listed the No.III biplane and No.IV monoplane, which had been built. In addition there were a smaller and a larger version of No.III, of which there were no sales and these remained unbuilt. The following is the estimated data extracted from the catalogue.
Data 30-35hp
Weight 750 lb without fuel or pilot
Lifting surface 400 sq ft
Width 35ft
Depth, fore and aft 25ft
Height overall 9ft 6in
Test flight 1hr
Speed range 35-45 mph
Gliding angle 1 in 7
Weight carrying 300 lb
Angle of ascent after 100 yard run on level ground
First 50 yd 1 in 7
Next 100 yd 1 in 10
Next mile 1 in 30
Price ?750
Data 50-60hp
Weight 1300 lb without fuel or pilot
Lifting surface 450 sq ft
Width 40ft
Depth, fore and aft 30ft
Height overall lift
Test flight Ihr
Speed range 40-58 mph
Gliding angle 1 in 6.5
Weight carrying 800 lb
Angle of ascent after 100 yard run on level ground
First 50 yd 1 in 6
Next 100 yd 1 in 9
Next mile 1 in 25
Price ?1,000
Data 100-160hp
Weight 1850 lb without fuel or pilot
Lifting surface 500 sq ft
Width 45ft
Depth, fore and aft 35ft
Height overall 12ft 6in
Test flight 1hr
Speed range 50-75 mph
Gliding angle 1 in 5
Weight carrying 1,000lb
Angle of ascent after 100 yard run on level ground
First 50 yd 1 in 4
Next 100 yd 1 in 6
Next mile 1 in 20
Price ?1,200 to ?1,800
The above details referred to the ordinary types of 'Touring Machines'. Specifications of 50-60hp and 100-160hp 'Special Racing Types' were available on application.
CODY monoplane No.VII (Transatlantic)
In April 1913 the Daily Mail offered a ? 10,000 prize for a Transatlantic flight, a challenge which Cody intended to accept. He planned to build a monoplane of 120ft span, mounted on twin floats and with a crew of three. For this venture he required a 400hp engine. He prepared a specification for a large twelve-cylinder engine and passed drawings and ?600 deposit to a French company to manufacture. This was abandoned after his death.
The last Cody aeroplane to be constructed was built to compete in the Daily Mail Seaplane Circuit of Britain, due to start from Calshot in August 1913. It was completed in July and was taken to Eelmoor Flash on the Basingstoke Canal for flotation trials. Thereafter the floats were removed and a wheel undercarriage fitted for flight trials. These included flying the machine to Brooklands on 3 August 1913 for the meeting on Sunday before the Bank Holiday. Cody planned to fly the machine to Calshot on Thursday 7 August for the floats to be fitted. However, in the morning he arranged to take up passengers and while he was flying with W.H.B. Evans, the Hampshire cricket captain, the machine broke up over Ball Hill near Cove and both Cody and his passenger fell to their deaths.
No.VI was the largest Cody aircraft, and had warping wings and a single front elevator. A large diamond shaped rudder pivoted between the booms and carried a small fixed triangular tailplane. Two seats were fitted in tandem, the pilot's controls and the chain driven propeller were similar to those on previous types. An enclosure to protect the crew was provided after the machine's early appearances.
No.VIA The narrow track land undercarriage incorporated a central skid serving as a front buffer and rear support. Sprung skids pivoted at the wing leading edge below the intermediate interplane struts prevented contact of the lower wingtips with the ground.
No.VIB The machine never flew as a seaplane, but the flotation gear consisted of a large three stepped central float with fabric decking. The balancing floats were fitted below the first set of interplane struts. These three floats were made by Harmsworth's Boatyard of Ash Vale, constructors of barges and boats, and were tested by being towed along the canal.
Power: 100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving by chain a 10ft 8in diameter four-bladed Garuda propeller. A four-bladed Integral was due to be fitted.
Data
Span 59ft 6in
Chord 6ft 10in
Gap 8ft
Area 770 sq ft
Area Elevators 75 sq ft
Area Rudders 40 sq ft
Area Damper tailplane 25 sq ft
Length 40ft 9in
Height 12ft 9in
Speed range 45-70 mph
CODY PROJECTS
In 1913 Cody considered establishing his own company for producing aircraft in greater numbers. A catalogue of types was produced in which were listed the No.III biplane and No.IV monoplane, which had been built. In addition there were a smaller and a larger version of No.III, of which there were no sales and these remained unbuilt. The following is the estimated data extracted from the catalogue.
Data 30-35hp
Weight 750 lb without fuel or pilot
Lifting surface 400 sq ft
Width 35ft
Depth, fore and aft 25ft
Height overall 9ft 6in
Test flight 1hr
Speed range 35-45 mph
Gliding angle 1 in 7
Weight carrying 300 lb
Angle of ascent after 100 yard run on level ground
First 50 yd 1 in 7
Next 100 yd 1 in 10
Next mile 1 in 30
Price ?750
Data 50-60hp
Weight 1300 lb without fuel or pilot
Lifting surface 450 sq ft
Width 40ft
Depth, fore and aft 30ft
Height overall lift
Test flight Ihr
Speed range 40-58 mph
Gliding angle 1 in 6.5
Weight carrying 800 lb
Angle of ascent after 100 yard run on level ground
First 50 yd 1 in 6
Next 100 yd 1 in 9
Next mile 1 in 25
Price ?1,000
Data 100-160hp
Weight 1850 lb without fuel or pilot
Lifting surface 500 sq ft
Width 45ft
Depth, fore and aft 35ft
Height overall 12ft 6in
Test flight 1hr
Speed range 50-75 mph
Gliding angle 1 in 5
Weight carrying 1,000lb
Angle of ascent after 100 yard run on level ground
First 50 yd 1 in 4
Next 100 yd 1 in 6
Next mile 1 in 20
Price ?1,200 to ?1,800
The above details referred to the ordinary types of 'Touring Machines'. Specifications of 50-60hp and 100-160hp 'Special Racing Types' were available on application.
CODY monoplane No.VII (Transatlantic)
In April 1913 the Daily Mail offered a ? 10,000 prize for a Transatlantic flight, a challenge which Cody intended to accept. He planned to build a monoplane of 120ft span, mounted on twin floats and with a crew of three. For this venture he required a 400hp engine. He prepared a specification for a large twelve-cylinder engine and passed drawings and ?600 deposit to a French company to manufacture. This was abandoned after his death.
Cody No.VIA for the Seaplane Circuit of Britain was flown only with land undercarriage. This is the machine in which Cody was killed.
Cody No.VIB. The Waterplane, fitted with floats by Harmsworth of Ash Vale, was flotation tested but not flown.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COLE Tandem monoplane (W. Cole & Sons Ltd., 92 High St., Kensington, W14)
A tandem monoplane designed by a Frenchman, M. Magnodex, was exhibited in an unfinished state at the Olympia Show of March 1911. The two wings of equal span were separated by a gap equal to the chord, the pilot being seated between and above the level of the wings. The engine intended to be a 120hp rotary or radial was to drive two propellers mounted on the ends of a single shaft driven by chain. A rudder was pivoted above a fixed tailplane, pitch control being by means of a flap below the pilot's seat. It is believed that the machine was not completed and did not fly.
A tandem monoplane designed by a Frenchman, M. Magnodex, was exhibited in an unfinished state at the Olympia Show of March 1911. The two wings of equal span were separated by a gap equal to the chord, the pilot being seated between and above the level of the wings. The engine intended to be a 120hp rotary or radial was to drive two propellers mounted on the ends of a single shaft driven by chain. A rudder was pivoted above a fixed tailplane, pitch control being by means of a flap below the pilot's seat. It is believed that the machine was not completed and did not fly.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COLLIER monoplane (H.A. and C.R. Collier, Plumstead, London, SE)
This machine was tested by the Collier brothers on Plumstead Marshes in early 1910, achieving a flight of half a mile on 7 March 1910. It was made by the family concern that later became famous for Matchless motorcycles, and was very similar to a Bleriot. The fuselage was of ash and the wings, elevators and rudder were of spruce. It was taken to Brooklands in September 1910, but was damaged during testing by F. Conway Jenkins when the machine was reported fitted with a more powerful engine.
Power:
20hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 8in diameter Chauviere propeller
40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee fitted later.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 6ft
Area 180sqft
Length 26ft
Weight 500 lb
Weight allup 650lb
This machine was tested by the Collier brothers on Plumstead Marshes in early 1910, achieving a flight of half a mile on 7 March 1910. It was made by the family concern that later became famous for Matchless motorcycles, and was very similar to a Bleriot. The fuselage was of ash and the wings, elevators and rudder were of spruce. It was taken to Brooklands in September 1910, but was damaged during testing by F. Conway Jenkins when the machine was reported fitted with a more powerful engine.
Power:
20hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 8in diameter Chauviere propeller
40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee fitted later.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 6ft
Area 180sqft
Length 26ft
Weight 500 lb
Weight allup 650lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COLLINS-HANCOCK monoplane
This machine, illustrated in Flight on 24 January 1914 (p. 102), was designed as a lightweight military scout. It could be easily transported by road, the fuselage being detachable and the wings could be folded; the dimensions were thus reduced to 20ft by 7ft.
The ailerons and elevators were controlled by rods and links. The propeller revolved round the central top longeron and was driven by bevel gears by an engine of unknown type set low at the rear of the nacelle. The pilot, seated at the front of the nacelle would have had a very good all-round view.
This interesting and potentially useful machine appears not to have been built.
Data
Span 25ft
Chord 5ft
Prop, diameter 6ft
Area 115 sq ft
Area: Rudder 2 x 8 sq ft
Area Tailplane 24.5 sq ft
Length 21ft
Front elevator 10 sq ft
This machine, illustrated in Flight on 24 January 1914 (p. 102), was designed as a lightweight military scout. It could be easily transported by road, the fuselage being detachable and the wings could be folded; the dimensions were thus reduced to 20ft by 7ft.
The ailerons and elevators were controlled by rods and links. The propeller revolved round the central top longeron and was driven by bevel gears by an engine of unknown type set low at the rear of the nacelle. The pilot, seated at the front of the nacelle would have had a very good all-round view.
This interesting and potentially useful machine appears not to have been built.
Data
Span 25ft
Chord 5ft
Prop, diameter 6ft
Area 115 sq ft
Area: Rudder 2 x 8 sq ft
Area Tailplane 24.5 sq ft
Length 21ft
Front elevator 10 sq ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COLLYER-ENGLAND biplane (Collyer and B.H. England, Shoreham, Sussex)
This machine, built in 1911, was an equal span tractor biplane with three bay wings having squarecut tips. Ailerons were fitted to both top and bottom wings. The undercarriage consisted of two pairs of wheels, each with a central skid, below the inboard interplane struts.
The original engine was a 30hp Alvaston, later replaced by a 35hp Green. Both engines were water-cooled with a radiator mounted below the top wing, the Green requiring a larger unit.
The machine is believed to have been abandoned after damage at Shoreham on 3 May 1912.
This machine, built in 1911, was an equal span tractor biplane with three bay wings having squarecut tips. Ailerons were fitted to both top and bottom wings. The undercarriage consisted of two pairs of wheels, each with a central skid, below the inboard interplane struts.
The original engine was a 30hp Alvaston, later replaced by a 35hp Green. Both engines were water-cooled with a radiator mounted below the top wing, the Green requiring a larger unit.
The machine is believed to have been abandoned after damage at Shoreham on 3 May 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COLLYER-LANG aeroplane (Nicknamed 'Otasell' and 'Hellhound')
This single-seater monoplane arrived at Brooklands during November 1910 and testing continued until February 1911 without much success, only brief hops being achieved. In its original form it was a pusher with twin rear booms, with the pilot seated ahead of the wings, between the two front skids. Inset single acting ailerons provided lateral control, and twin rudders within the booms and a tail mounted elevator comprised the other control surfaces. The engine was a 30hp WLA (Adams) motor.
In March 1911 the machine reappeared at Brooklands converted to a tractor biplane with pilot and engine positions interchanged and described as a 'one and a bit plane', with a pair of smaller planes fitted above the originals. No subsequent reports appeared.
This single-seater monoplane arrived at Brooklands during November 1910 and testing continued until February 1911 without much success, only brief hops being achieved. In its original form it was a pusher with twin rear booms, with the pilot seated ahead of the wings, between the two front skids. Inset single acting ailerons provided lateral control, and twin rudders within the booms and a tail mounted elevator comprised the other control surfaces. The engine was a 30hp WLA (Adams) motor.
In March 1911 the machine reappeared at Brooklands converted to a tractor biplane with pilot and engine positions interchanged and described as a 'one and a bit plane', with a pair of smaller planes fitted above the originals. No subsequent reports appeared.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COLSTON glider (A. Miller, Bishopsbriggs, Glasgow)
A canard monoplane glider was built in 1914 by Colston Gliding Club members and crashed in 1915.
Data
Span 24ft,
Chord 6ft,
Length 24ft.
A canard monoplane glider was built in 1914 by Colston Gliding Club members and crashed in 1915.
Data
Span 24ft,
Chord 6ft,
Length 24ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COMET Aerocycle (Portman Academy of Motoring and Aviation, Little George St., London W)
As the name implies, the basis of the machine was a bicycle to which a superstructure was added to mount a monoplane wing. This was braced to a cabane above and to the cycle frame and had considerable taper and dihedral. The rider sat below a covered center section the pedals driving a tractor propeller in addition to the rear wheel. The machine was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910 in the Model Section.
Data
Span 23ft
Length 13ft
Optional extra 5 1/2hp engine.
Price ?160.
As the name implies, the basis of the machine was a bicycle to which a superstructure was added to mount a monoplane wing. This was braced to a cabane above and to the cycle frame and had considerable taper and dihedral. The rider sat below a covered center section the pedals driving a tractor propeller in addition to the rear wheel. The machine was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910 in the Model Section.
Data
Span 23ft
Length 13ft
Optional extra 5 1/2hp engine.
Price ?160.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CONISBROUGH gliders (Conisbrough & District Aeroplane Society, 18 Church St., Conisbrough)
This mainly model building club was presented with a full size glider by the Sheffield Model Aero Club in May 1911. In the course of rebuilding it was reduced in span from 42ft to 24ft. In this form it was only capable of lifting a light person to a height of 20ft when towed manually. The machine consisted of a pair of two bay wings with no stabilizing surfaces. Gliding in this manner was dangerous and was soon discontinued. A second glider of Demoiselle type was under construction by club members F.J. Wright and G.N. Wilton at Doncaster in the second half of 1911, but may not have been completed.
This mainly model building club was presented with a full size glider by the Sheffield Model Aero Club in May 1911. In the course of rebuilding it was reduced in span from 42ft to 24ft. In this form it was only capable of lifting a light person to a height of 20ft when towed manually. The machine consisted of a pair of two bay wings with no stabilizing surfaces. Gliding in this manner was dangerous and was soon discontinued. A second glider of Demoiselle type was under construction by club members F.J. Wright and G.N. Wilton at Doncaster in the second half of 1911, but may not have been completed.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COOPER glider No.1 (G.T. Cooper, Charterhouse School, Godalming, Surrey)
During his last year at Charterhouse School Cooper built a biplane glider between February and July 1911, which was tested under tow.
Data
Span 24ft,
Chord 5ft,
Length 18ft.
COOPER glider No.2 (G.T. Cooper, 41 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh)
After settling in Scotland, Cooper built a second glider in 1911, which he later presented to the East of Scotland Aero Club. It was an unequal span biplane with single-acting ailerons hinged on the trailing edge of the top plane extensions. Bamboo booms carried a horizontal tail and divided elevator.
Cooper was a civil engineer and the Hon. Secretary of the Edinburgh Aeronautical Society and was a driving force behind aviation in Scotland.
Data
Span, 22ft,
Length 18ft.
During his last year at Charterhouse School Cooper built a biplane glider between February and July 1911, which was tested under tow.
Data
Span 24ft,
Chord 5ft,
Length 18ft.
COOPER glider No.2 (G.T. Cooper, 41 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh)
After settling in Scotland, Cooper built a second glider in 1911, which he later presented to the East of Scotland Aero Club. It was an unequal span biplane with single-acting ailerons hinged on the trailing edge of the top plane extensions. Bamboo booms carried a horizontal tail and divided elevator.
Cooper was a civil engineer and the Hon. Secretary of the Edinburgh Aeronautical Society and was a driving force behind aviation in Scotland.
Data
Span, 22ft,
Length 18ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COOPER biplane (G.T. Cooper, Edinburgh)
Cooper designed a biplane in 1913 and it was partly built by John Gibson (q.v.), to whom it was known as his Caledonia XI. It was fitted with a 35hp Humber engine and made several flights in September 1913 between Cramond and Cramond Sands. The wingspan was 30ft.
Cooper designed a biplane in 1913 and it was partly built by John Gibson (q.v.), to whom it was known as his Caledonia XI. It was fitted with a 35hp Humber engine and made several flights in September 1913 between Cramond and Cramond Sands. The wingspan was 30ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CORDNER monoplane No.l (Joseph Cordner, John St., Londonderry, N. Ireland)
The aeronautical Press seem to have missed the work that Corder was carrying out in Northern Ireland until Flight published an article on his latest machine in 1915. This was the result of several years of work which included this, and one other full size aircraft, the first of which was tested on the foreshore of Lough Swilly at Lisfannon, near Buncrana, County Donegal in late 1909 and 1910.
The layout was fairly conventional, but with an original type of wing. The fuselage was a triangular section braced wooden girder, originally open, but later covered with fabric. The main struts of the undercarriage were continued up as a pylon for the wing bracing cables, forming a substantial Aframe; a large nosewheel, mounted on tubular struts, completed the chassis; a tail-skid was also fitted.
The tail unit consisted of a one piece tailplane mounted on the top longerons probably moveable for control in pitch. There was no fin or rudder. The wing incorporated the feature of the design covered in Patent No.2521/1911, consisting of a series of triangular section tunnels across the chord, allowing air to enter below the leading edge and to exit above the trailing edge. The system was claimed to 'grip' the air and prevent sideslip. Similar tunnels were fitted to the tailplane.
Power: 40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee.
The aeronautical Press seem to have missed the work that Corder was carrying out in Northern Ireland until Flight published an article on his latest machine in 1915. This was the result of several years of work which included this, and one other full size aircraft, the first of which was tested on the foreshore of Lough Swilly at Lisfannon, near Buncrana, County Donegal in late 1909 and 1910.
The layout was fairly conventional, but with an original type of wing. The fuselage was a triangular section braced wooden girder, originally open, but later covered with fabric. The main struts of the undercarriage were continued up as a pylon for the wing bracing cables, forming a substantial Aframe; a large nosewheel, mounted on tubular struts, completed the chassis; a tail-skid was also fitted.
The tail unit consisted of a one piece tailplane mounted on the top longerons probably moveable for control in pitch. There was no fin or rudder. The wing incorporated the feature of the design covered in Patent No.2521/1911, consisting of a series of triangular section tunnels across the chord, allowing air to enter below the leading edge and to exit above the trailing edge. The system was claimed to 'grip' the air and prevent sideslip. Similar tunnels were fitted to the tailplane.
Power: 40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CORDNER monoplane No.2
The second Cordner monoplane still embodied the tunnels in the wing, but was considerably different in other respects. Although it was not reported by Flight until 1915, it is believed to have been tested in 1911-1912 at Bond's Field, The Waterside, Londonderry.
The fuselage, apart from the engine bay, was fully covered and was mounted on a two-wheeled undercarriage with twin skids, the front struts being well forward and connected to the engine mounting. The pylon for the bracing cables consisted of four struts on the top longerons just ahead of the pilot. The tailplane on the top longerons, extended well forward and carried a divided elevator. The triangular rudder with rounded corners was pivoted on the rearmost fuselage member; there was no fin.
The top surface of the wing was uncovered for about one third of the chord, revealing the exits of the tunnels. Lateral control was by flaps near the tips, acting as spoilers, in an upward direction only.
Power: 45, 50/60 or 80hp Anzani six-cylinder air-cooled radial.
The second Cordner monoplane still embodied the tunnels in the wing, but was considerably different in other respects. Although it was not reported by Flight until 1915, it is believed to have been tested in 1911-1912 at Bond's Field, The Waterside, Londonderry.
The fuselage, apart from the engine bay, was fully covered and was mounted on a two-wheeled undercarriage with twin skids, the front struts being well forward and connected to the engine mounting. The pylon for the bracing cables consisted of four struts on the top longerons just ahead of the pilot. The tailplane on the top longerons, extended well forward and carried a divided elevator. The triangular rudder with rounded corners was pivoted on the rearmost fuselage member; there was no fin.
The top surface of the wing was uncovered for about one third of the chord, revealing the exits of the tunnels. Lateral control was by flaps near the tips, acting as spoilers, in an upward direction only.
Power: 45, 50/60 or 80hp Anzani six-cylinder air-cooled radial.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
COVENTRY ORDNANCE WORKS biplanes
This company took over the Howard Wright works at Battersea and hangar No.32 at Brooklands in late 1911, and manufactured two biplanes for entry in the Military Trials, due to start in August 1912. Howard Wright and W.O. Manning were responsible for the design and manufacture at Battersea, although Howard Wright resigned in the autumn when the first aircraft was complete. Although there was some similarity, there were also considerable differences between the two machines.
COW Military Trials biplane No.10
This was a side-by-side two-seater with rotary engine, with fuselage sides parallel in plan view to the tail. The fuselage was mounted above the lower wing, to which it was connected by struts enclosed in a fairing housing the main fuel tank. There was a wide gap between the top and bottom wings, which were connected by four pairs of interplane struts. The wings were tapered, with well-rounded tips and with considerable overhang to the top wing, which was braced to kingposts above the outer pair of interplane struts. The tail unit was unconventional, consisting of small twin fins and rudders and large fixed surfaces on either side of the fuselage. The two rudders and elevators were of similar part circular shape with aerodynamic balance areas. The undercarriage, with central skid, was not sprung and relied on the tires to absorb shocks. The top wing center section was cut away at the trailing edge after the machine's initial appearance.
Sopwith tested the machine at Brooklands from 5 May 1912 including the first week of the trials at Larkhill, when he was committed to leave to race in America for the Harmsworth Trophy for power boats. On one flight at Brooklands Sopwith carried three passengers, causing the machine to be nicknamed 'Wombus' (W.O. Manning's omnibus). Raynham flew the aircraft subsequently in the trials at Larkhill, where it was forced to withdraw for various reasons after a poor performance.
After the return of the machine to Brooklands, Manning, still with the company after Wright had left, redesigned the machine which flew in its modified form on 13 January 1913 for the first time. New four-bay wings of increased span and parallel chord were fitted and, as the gap was reduced, the fuselage rested directly on the lower wing. Inversely tapered ailerons replaced wing warping and larger elevators were fitted. A lengthened undercarriage maintained the propeller ground clearance. Later the chain drive was discarded and a smaller two-bladed propeller was fitted. The machine continued in use to the end of 1913.
Power: 100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled rotary, driving by Renolds chain and shaft at 2:1 reduction a 11ft 6in diameter two-bladed propeller.
Data 1st Version 2nd Version 3rd Version
Span top 40ft - 56ft
Span bottom 24ft 8in - -
Chord top 6ft tapering to 4ft 6in - -
Chord bottom 6ft tapering to 5ft 2in - -
Gap 8ft - -
Wing area 350 sq ft(1) - 630 sq ft
Tailplane span - 8ft 2in -
Elevators span - 11ft 9in 14ft 3 in
Area tailplane - 35 sq ft(2) -
Area elevators - 14sq.ft(3) 27.4 sq ft
Area fin - 4 sq ft -
Area rudder - 14sq.ft(4) -
Height rudder - 4ft. -
Length 33ft 3in - -
Height 12ft 8in - -
Weight 1,200lb - 1,100lb
Weight allup 1,950 lb - 1,900 lb
Speed range 20-60 mph - -
(1) Also reported as 337 sq ft. (3) Also reported as 17.3 sq ft.
(2) Also reported as 31 sq ft. (4) Also reported as 15.6 sq ft.
COW Military Trials biplane No.II
The second machine for the trials was a tandem two-seater with a water-cooled engine, and although of generally similar conception, varied from the first in many features. The fuselage was narrower and shorter but was still parallel in plan and was mounted higher in the wing gap. A similar center skid undercarriage had the addition of two skids behind the wheels. The wings were reduced in span and parallel with rounded tips and with skids under the wingtips. A single fin and rudder were fitted and both these and the tailplane and elevators were large and curvaceous in shape. The Chenu engine had a gear reduction drive and was cooled by radiators on either side of the fuselage.
This machine arrived late at Larkhill for the trials and did not fly owing to engine problems. It seems to have been abandoned soon after.
Power: 110hp Chenu six-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving by gearing at 2:1 reduction a lift 6in diameter four-bladed propeller.
Data
Span top 35ft
Span bottom 22ft
Tailplane span 10ft
Elevators span 13ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 8ft
Area 290.5 sq ft
Tailplane area 35.8 sq ft
Elevators area 24 sq ft
Rudder area 10.8 sq ft
Length 31ft 3in
Rudder height 5 ft 3 in
Height 13ft 2in
Weight 1,250lb
Weight allup 2,050 lb
Max speed 68-70 mph
COW biplane seaplane
A tractor biplane seaplane was ordered from COW under Contract CP40688/13, to be fitted with a 160hp Gnome. It was allotted the RN serial number 54, but was never delivered, although it was still on order in September 1915. It was also listed to have an 80hp Gnome.
This company took over the Howard Wright works at Battersea and hangar No.32 at Brooklands in late 1911, and manufactured two biplanes for entry in the Military Trials, due to start in August 1912. Howard Wright and W.O. Manning were responsible for the design and manufacture at Battersea, although Howard Wright resigned in the autumn when the first aircraft was complete. Although there was some similarity, there were also considerable differences between the two machines.
COW Military Trials biplane No.10
This was a side-by-side two-seater with rotary engine, with fuselage sides parallel in plan view to the tail. The fuselage was mounted above the lower wing, to which it was connected by struts enclosed in a fairing housing the main fuel tank. There was a wide gap between the top and bottom wings, which were connected by four pairs of interplane struts. The wings were tapered, with well-rounded tips and with considerable overhang to the top wing, which was braced to kingposts above the outer pair of interplane struts. The tail unit was unconventional, consisting of small twin fins and rudders and large fixed surfaces on either side of the fuselage. The two rudders and elevators were of similar part circular shape with aerodynamic balance areas. The undercarriage, with central skid, was not sprung and relied on the tires to absorb shocks. The top wing center section was cut away at the trailing edge after the machine's initial appearance.
Sopwith tested the machine at Brooklands from 5 May 1912 including the first week of the trials at Larkhill, when he was committed to leave to race in America for the Harmsworth Trophy for power boats. On one flight at Brooklands Sopwith carried three passengers, causing the machine to be nicknamed 'Wombus' (W.O. Manning's omnibus). Raynham flew the aircraft subsequently in the trials at Larkhill, where it was forced to withdraw for various reasons after a poor performance.
After the return of the machine to Brooklands, Manning, still with the company after Wright had left, redesigned the machine which flew in its modified form on 13 January 1913 for the first time. New four-bay wings of increased span and parallel chord were fitted and, as the gap was reduced, the fuselage rested directly on the lower wing. Inversely tapered ailerons replaced wing warping and larger elevators were fitted. A lengthened undercarriage maintained the propeller ground clearance. Later the chain drive was discarded and a smaller two-bladed propeller was fitted. The machine continued in use to the end of 1913.
Power: 100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled rotary, driving by Renolds chain and shaft at 2:1 reduction a 11ft 6in diameter two-bladed propeller.
Data 1st Version 2nd Version 3rd Version
Span top 40ft - 56ft
Span bottom 24ft 8in - -
Chord top 6ft tapering to 4ft 6in - -
Chord bottom 6ft tapering to 5ft 2in - -
Gap 8ft - -
Wing area 350 sq ft(1) - 630 sq ft
Tailplane span - 8ft 2in -
Elevators span - 11ft 9in 14ft 3 in
Area tailplane - 35 sq ft(2) -
Area elevators - 14sq.ft(3) 27.4 sq ft
Area fin - 4 sq ft -
Area rudder - 14sq.ft(4) -
Height rudder - 4ft. -
Length 33ft 3in - -
Height 12ft 8in - -
Weight 1,200lb - 1,100lb
Weight allup 1,950 lb - 1,900 lb
Speed range 20-60 mph - -
(1) Also reported as 337 sq ft. (3) Also reported as 17.3 sq ft.
(2) Also reported as 31 sq ft. (4) Also reported as 15.6 sq ft.
COW Military Trials biplane No.II
The second machine for the trials was a tandem two-seater with a water-cooled engine, and although of generally similar conception, varied from the first in many features. The fuselage was narrower and shorter but was still parallel in plan and was mounted higher in the wing gap. A similar center skid undercarriage had the addition of two skids behind the wheels. The wings were reduced in span and parallel with rounded tips and with skids under the wingtips. A single fin and rudder were fitted and both these and the tailplane and elevators were large and curvaceous in shape. The Chenu engine had a gear reduction drive and was cooled by radiators on either side of the fuselage.
This machine arrived late at Larkhill for the trials and did not fly owing to engine problems. It seems to have been abandoned soon after.
Power: 110hp Chenu six-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving by gearing at 2:1 reduction a lift 6in diameter four-bladed propeller.
Data
Span top 35ft
Span bottom 22ft
Tailplane span 10ft
Elevators span 13ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 8ft
Area 290.5 sq ft
Tailplane area 35.8 sq ft
Elevators area 24 sq ft
Rudder area 10.8 sq ft
Length 31ft 3in
Rudder height 5 ft 3 in
Height 13ft 2in
Weight 1,250lb
Weight allup 2,050 lb
Max speed 68-70 mph
COW biplane seaplane
A tractor biplane seaplane was ordered from COW under Contract CP40688/13, to be fitted with a 160hp Gnome. It was allotted the RN serial number 54, but was never delivered, although it was still on order in September 1915. It was also listed to have an 80hp Gnome.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CREESE-DEDERICH monoplane (A.E. Creese and W. Dederich designers)
Although this machine arrived at the Blackpool Meeting in October 1909 there were no reports of any successful flights taking place there or subsequently. The aircraft was a single-seat tractor monoplane with lateral control by sliding panels to increase the wing area, and consequently the lift, as selected. The undercarriage was sprung pneumatically. These features were covered by Patent Nos.23757-8/1909.
Power: 30hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan type semiradial.
Data
Span 25ft increasing to 28ft
Normal area 168 sq ft
Length 24ft
Weight 450 lb
Speed 30mph (estimated)
Although this machine arrived at the Blackpool Meeting in October 1909 there were no reports of any successful flights taking place there or subsequently. The aircraft was a single-seat tractor monoplane with lateral control by sliding panels to increase the wing area, and consequently the lift, as selected. The undercarriage was sprung pneumatically. These features were covered by Patent Nos.23757-8/1909.
Power: 30hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan type semiradial.
Data
Span 25ft increasing to 28ft
Normal area 168 sq ft
Length 24ft
Weight 450 lb
Speed 30mph (estimated)
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
CROMPTON monoplane (H.D. Crompton, Walton-on-the-Hill, Surrey)
Nothing further was heard after Flight published a photograph and details of this single-seat pusher monoplane with front elevator on 4 November 1911 (p.965). The engine was for sale in September 1912.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled.
Data
Span 30ft
Area 160 sq ft
Length 28ft
Weight allup 600lb
Nothing further was heard after Flight published a photograph and details of this single-seat pusher monoplane with front elevator on 4 November 1911 (p.965). The engine was for sale in September 1912.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled.
Data
Span 30ft
Area 160 sq ft
Length 28ft
Weight allup 600lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DAVIDSON Air-Car monoplane 1897-1898 (George Louis Outram Davidson, Davidson Air-Car Construction Syndicate Ltd., Banchory, Grampian, Scotland)
Davidson's interest in flight began in 1883, and he intended his machine to operate in a series of lifts, followed by horizontal flights, like a bird; the airflow being regulated by flaps in the wings, as appropriate. Some of his work is covered by patent Nos. 12469/1896 and 13207/1889. Model tests took place at Banchory in 1897 and lift fans were tested by a London consultant, followed by the preparation of a design by a constructional engineer W.L. Hamilton. Finance for construction was sought into 1897, when the project lapsed.
The machine was a high wing monoplane, with a double-decker fuselage for twenty passengers and crew. The lift was obtained from 22 propellers of 6ft diameter in the wings, with their axes set vertically. These were driven by belts from the powerplant in the center section. Automatic stability in all planes, was to be provided by a pendulum arrangement, controlling the tail surfaces, and directional control by nose rudder or 'beak'.
Data
Span 100ft
Length 48ft
Height 14ft
Fuselage width 10ft
Lift generated 10 tons
DAVIDSON Air-Car monoplane 1906-1908 (Head Office, Jermyn St., London. Construction Site, Nichol's Castle, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.)
A second version of the project was revived by Davidson in 1906, working from offices in London, where he engaged A. V. Roe as a draughtsman. In April the project was moved to the U.S.A., where Davidson had mining interests. British patent No. 1960/1907 was taken out in January to protect the design.
The machine was still a monoplane with deep arched wings, but the lift and propulsion system now consisted of a single large lifter in each wing, the outer half of which protruded from the wing. The vertical axis could be tilted to control the direction of flight, and was a means of overcoming the undulating flight path of the first scheme.
The incomplete center section, with its rotary lifters, was constructed at Montclair, near Denver, but suffered a mishap when tested on 6 May 1908, with just one Stanley steam engine of only 10hp. No further progress was made with this machine and activities returned to Britain.
Power: Two 50hp Stanley steam engines driving two 110 blade, 27ft 8in diameter rotary 'lifters'.
Data
Span 67ft
Lift generated 7 tons
Length 60ft
Height 13ft
Fuselage width 8ft
Distance between 40ft
axes of lifters
Davidson's interest in flight began in 1883, and he intended his machine to operate in a series of lifts, followed by horizontal flights, like a bird; the airflow being regulated by flaps in the wings, as appropriate. Some of his work is covered by patent Nos. 12469/1896 and 13207/1889. Model tests took place at Banchory in 1897 and lift fans were tested by a London consultant, followed by the preparation of a design by a constructional engineer W.L. Hamilton. Finance for construction was sought into 1897, when the project lapsed.
The machine was a high wing monoplane, with a double-decker fuselage for twenty passengers and crew. The lift was obtained from 22 propellers of 6ft diameter in the wings, with their axes set vertically. These were driven by belts from the powerplant in the center section. Automatic stability in all planes, was to be provided by a pendulum arrangement, controlling the tail surfaces, and directional control by nose rudder or 'beak'.
Data
Span 100ft
Length 48ft
Height 14ft
Fuselage width 10ft
Lift generated 10 tons
DAVIDSON Air-Car monoplane 1906-1908 (Head Office, Jermyn St., London. Construction Site, Nichol's Castle, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.)
A second version of the project was revived by Davidson in 1906, working from offices in London, where he engaged A. V. Roe as a draughtsman. In April the project was moved to the U.S.A., where Davidson had mining interests. British patent No. 1960/1907 was taken out in January to protect the design.
The machine was still a monoplane with deep arched wings, but the lift and propulsion system now consisted of a single large lifter in each wing, the outer half of which protruded from the wing. The vertical axis could be tilted to control the direction of flight, and was a means of overcoming the undulating flight path of the first scheme.
The incomplete center section, with its rotary lifters, was constructed at Montclair, near Denver, but suffered a mishap when tested on 6 May 1908, with just one Stanley steam engine of only 10hp. No further progress was made with this machine and activities returned to Britain.
Power: Two 50hp Stanley steam engines driving two 110 blade, 27ft 8in diameter rotary 'lifters'.
Data
Span 67ft
Lift generated 7 tons
Length 60ft
Height 13ft
Fuselage width 8ft
Distance between 40ft
axes of lifters
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DAVIDSON Gyropter biplane 1908-1911 (Davidson's Gyropter Flying Machine Ltd. Amerden Bank, Taplow, Berkshire)
Davidson returned to Britain to build his next machine named 'Gyropter', which he entered for the Daily Mail prize of ?10,000, for a flight from London to Manchester. The first plans were for a machine weighing four tons, carrying twelve passengers, which would do the flight in three hours. The machine was shown in model form at Olympia in 1911, and was a biplane with three pairs of wings in tandem with lifting fans, as on the previous machine, fitted at the center pair. The fuselage was again a double-decker, with a 'beak' nose rudder, and tail surfaces. The two steam engines in the fuselage drove the lifters through shafts and bevel gearing. By June 1910 the wooden structure was well advanced, but funds were short, so Davidson issued a new company prospectus. By February 1911 both lifters and one engine had been installed. Further funds were required and a new brochure now gave a weight of seven tons, a lifting power of ten tons, twenty passengers and speed in excess of 100 mph. The finance was not forthcoming and the project faded away.
Power: Two 60hp Stanley steam engines driving two 26ft 10in diameter 'lifters'.
Data
Span 76ft
Length 66ft
Davidson returned to Britain to build his next machine named 'Gyropter', which he entered for the Daily Mail prize of ?10,000, for a flight from London to Manchester. The first plans were for a machine weighing four tons, carrying twelve passengers, which would do the flight in three hours. The machine was shown in model form at Olympia in 1911, and was a biplane with three pairs of wings in tandem with lifting fans, as on the previous machine, fitted at the center pair. The fuselage was again a double-decker, with a 'beak' nose rudder, and tail surfaces. The two steam engines in the fuselage drove the lifters through shafts and bevel gearing. By June 1910 the wooden structure was well advanced, but funds were short, so Davidson issued a new company prospectus. By February 1911 both lifters and one engine had been installed. Further funds were required and a new brochure now gave a weight of seven tons, a lifting power of ten tons, twenty passengers and speed in excess of 100 mph. The finance was not forthcoming and the project faded away.
Power: Two 60hp Stanley steam engines driving two 26ft 10in diameter 'lifters'.
Data
Span 76ft
Length 66ft
Davidson Gyropter tandem biplane of 1908-1911. This model was at the Olympia Aero Show in 1911 and construction was well advanced at Taplow.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DAVIES biplane gliders (Walter Davies, Dudley, Worcestershire.)
The first of Davies' two gliders was built in 1911, and his report on his first experience under tow was conveyed in a letter to Flight of 12 August 1911 (p.708). Later, when describing his second glider, he explained that the lack of a suitable ground and local disinterest caused him to dismantle it and build a more readily transportable machine. A drawing of the No.2 glider and notes on his trials appeared in Flight on 6 December 1913 (p.133-178). Both towed and free flights were made, the longest being 130ft.
Data No.1 No.2
Span top 30ft 30ft lin
Span bottom 20ft 20ft lin
Chord 5ft 5ft
Area 283.75 sq ft 285 sq ft
Length - 21ft
Weight allup - 285lb
The first of Davies' two gliders was built in 1911, and his report on his first experience under tow was conveyed in a letter to Flight of 12 August 1911 (p.708). Later, when describing his second glider, he explained that the lack of a suitable ground and local disinterest caused him to dismantle it and build a more readily transportable machine. A drawing of the No.2 glider and notes on his trials appeared in Flight on 6 December 1913 (p.133-178). Both towed and free flights were made, the longest being 130ft.
Data No.1 No.2
Span top 30ft 30ft lin
Span bottom 20ft 20ft lin
Chord 5ft 5ft
Area 283.75 sq ft 285 sq ft
Length - 21ft
Weight allup - 285lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DAWSON glider (Mr. and Mrs. Charles E. Dawson (nee Miss Gertrude Robins) Naphill, near High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire)
This unequal span glider was designed by Dawson and made by Mulliners Coachworks Ltd., Long Acre, London and Northampton in 1911. It carried the stage name of his actress wife, Gertrude Robins, under the front elevator.
This unequal span glider was designed by Dawson and made by Mulliners Coachworks Ltd., Long Acre, London and Northampton in 1911. It carried the stage name of his actress wife, Gertrude Robins, under the front elevator.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DAWSON & de PAVILLET monoplane (Canterbury Motor Co., The Pavilion, Rhodaus Town, Canterbury, Kent)
H.A. Dawson was the driving force behind the construction of this aircraft, his partner, H.F. de Pavillet, being more concerned with the business aspects of the motor manufacturing and sales side.
The machine, which resembled a Demoiselle, was constructed of bamboo and steel tube, and was fitted with a 30hp Alvaston twin-cylinder, horizontally opposed, water-cooled engine. This had sufficient power for only a few hops when the machine was tested by Dawson in June 1910 at Old Park, St. Martin's Hill, Canterbury. The engine was changed for an Antoinette, probably a vee four, water-cooled type of 24hp, which proved to be too heavy. An Anzani, reportedly a horizontally opposed engine, was then fitted, but the aircraft was still not successful. It was sold to Mr. Dan Sherrin of Whitstable, less the engine, which was used to drive a compressor at the works for many years.
H.A. Dawson was the driving force behind the construction of this aircraft, his partner, H.F. de Pavillet, being more concerned with the business aspects of the motor manufacturing and sales side.
The machine, which resembled a Demoiselle, was constructed of bamboo and steel tube, and was fitted with a 30hp Alvaston twin-cylinder, horizontally opposed, water-cooled engine. This had sufficient power for only a few hops when the machine was tested by Dawson in June 1910 at Old Park, St. Martin's Hill, Canterbury. The engine was changed for an Antoinette, probably a vee four, water-cooled type of 24hp, which proved to be too heavy. An Anzani, reportedly a horizontally opposed engine, was then fitted, but the aircraft was still not successful. It was sold to Mr. Dan Sherrin of Whitstable, less the engine, which was used to drive a compressor at the works for many years.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DAY monoplane (F.W. Day, 334 Commercial Rd., Portsmouth, Hampshire)
Also referred to as the Hampshire Aero Club monoplane. The machine was at Fort Grange in April 1910, no engine was fitted, and it was offered for sale in May 1910.
Data
Span 35ft
Chord 6ft lin
Area 220 sq ft
Length 22ft
Weight 320 lb
Area tailplane 30 sq ft
Area rudder 6 sq ft
Also referred to as the Hampshire Aero Club monoplane. The machine was at Fort Grange in April 1910, no engine was fitted, and it was offered for sale in May 1910.
Data
Span 35ft
Chord 6ft lin
Area 220 sq ft
Length 22ft
Weight 320 lb
Area tailplane 30 sq ft
Area rudder 6 sq ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
De HAVILLAND biplane No.l (Geoffrey de Havilland, Bothwell Rd., Fulham & Newbury)
The design and manufacture of this machine began in 1908 and continued throughout 1909 at Fulham until November, when it was moved to a shed at Seven Barrows near Newbury on Lord Carnarvon's estate for final assembly. This was completed and initial tests were carried out by December, when, during a fast run, de Havilland attempted to take off. This resulted in complete failure of the wing spars, made from weak pinewood. de Havilland was assisted with the construction by FT. Hearle, later a director of the DH company, and his wife.
The design was a three bay biplane with twin pusher propellers. The fuselage was an open girder tapering to the front, which mounted a divided elevator, and to the rear where the rudder was pivoted between the girder and a boom mounted on the top wing. Single acting ailerons on the top wing provided lateral control. The undercarriage had front and rear wheels in addition to the main pair, supplemented by wingtip skids.
The engine was also designed by Geoffrey de Havilland and was made for him for ?250 by the Iris Motor Co. of Willesden, where his elder brother Ivor had been chief designer before his early death.
Power: 45hp Iris four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled driving two aluminum adjustable pitch propellers through shafts and gearing.
Data
Span 36ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft
Area 408 sq ft
Area elevators 36 sq ft
Tailplane 25 sq ft
Rudder 7 sq ft
Length 29ft
Height 10ft
Weight 850 lb
The design and manufacture of this machine began in 1908 and continued throughout 1909 at Fulham until November, when it was moved to a shed at Seven Barrows near Newbury on Lord Carnarvon's estate for final assembly. This was completed and initial tests were carried out by December, when, during a fast run, de Havilland attempted to take off. This resulted in complete failure of the wing spars, made from weak pinewood. de Havilland was assisted with the construction by FT. Hearle, later a director of the DH company, and his wife.
The design was a three bay biplane with twin pusher propellers. The fuselage was an open girder tapering to the front, which mounted a divided elevator, and to the rear where the rudder was pivoted between the girder and a boom mounted on the top wing. Single acting ailerons on the top wing provided lateral control. The undercarriage had front and rear wheels in addition to the main pair, supplemented by wingtip skids.
The engine was also designed by Geoffrey de Havilland and was made for him for ?250 by the Iris Motor Co. of Willesden, where his elder brother Ivor had been chief designer before his early death.
Power: 45hp Iris four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled driving two aluminum adjustable pitch propellers through shafts and gearing.
Data
Span 36ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft
Area 408 sq ft
Area elevators 36 sq ft
Tailplane 25 sq ft
Rudder 7 sq ft
Length 29ft
Height 10ft
Weight 850 lb
"Havilland No. I" completed and ready for trial at Seven Barrows. Note the bevel-driven propellers and the hinged wing-tips. De Havilland No.l was a twin-pusher biplane which suffered structural failure during taxiing trials in December 1909.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
De HAVILLAND biplane No.2
The second de Havilland machine used the original engine, but was an entirely new design resembling a Farman in layout. The Iris engine was cooled by a radiator mounted horizontally above the fuel tank between the wings. The wooden structure of twin booms, parallel in plan, carried at the front a single elevator, and the tapering rear booms mounted a fixed tailplane and fin, elevator and rudder. The small fixed tailplane was added to overcome tail heaviness. Lateral control was by ailerons, hinged at the trailing edge of the top wings.
The machine flew for the first time on 10 September 1910, and by November flights up to forty minutes had been accomplished, including some with a passenger. In this month de Havilland applied to Mervyn O'Gorman, Superintendent at Farnborough, for a technical post which he took up in January 1911. In addition, the aircraft was purchased for ?400 by the War Office and used at Farnborough for development work, being renamed FE.l after its acceptance in January 1911. The foreplane and front booms were removed during the course of this work.
Power: 45hp Iris four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled driving a two-bladed wooden propeller.
Data
Span 33ft 6in
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5 ft 6in
Area 340 sq ft
Weight allup 1,100lb
Length 40ft
Speed 37 mph
FE.1 (Farman Experimental) biplane
This aircraft was not built at Farnborough, but was the second aircraft designed and built by Geoffrey de Havilland, which became Government property in January 1911, when he joined the Factory. It was designated FE.l, and survived at Farnborough until 15 August 1911, when it was crashed by Lt. T. Ridge and became the subject for a 'reconstruction' as FE.2.
In its short life at Farnborough, it was improved and used for experiments with new tailplane, elevator and wing extensions, including flights with the front elevator removed. An altitude of 920 feet was reached and passengers were carried on a number of occasions which included tuition for Lt. Ridge, who was the Assistant Superintendent of the Factory.
Power: 45hp Iris four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled
Data
Span 33 ft
Length 40ft
Area 340 sq. ft
Weight allup 1,100lb.
The second de Havilland machine used the original engine, but was an entirely new design resembling a Farman in layout. The Iris engine was cooled by a radiator mounted horizontally above the fuel tank between the wings. The wooden structure of twin booms, parallel in plan, carried at the front a single elevator, and the tapering rear booms mounted a fixed tailplane and fin, elevator and rudder. The small fixed tailplane was added to overcome tail heaviness. Lateral control was by ailerons, hinged at the trailing edge of the top wings.
The machine flew for the first time on 10 September 1910, and by November flights up to forty minutes had been accomplished, including some with a passenger. In this month de Havilland applied to Mervyn O'Gorman, Superintendent at Farnborough, for a technical post which he took up in January 1911. In addition, the aircraft was purchased for ?400 by the War Office and used at Farnborough for development work, being renamed FE.l after its acceptance in January 1911. The foreplane and front booms were removed during the course of this work.
Power: 45hp Iris four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled driving a two-bladed wooden propeller.
Data
Span 33ft 6in
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5 ft 6in
Area 340 sq ft
Weight allup 1,100lb
Length 40ft
Speed 37 mph
FE.1 (Farman Experimental) biplane
This aircraft was not built at Farnborough, but was the second aircraft designed and built by Geoffrey de Havilland, which became Government property in January 1911, when he joined the Factory. It was designated FE.l, and survived at Farnborough until 15 August 1911, when it was crashed by Lt. T. Ridge and became the subject for a 'reconstruction' as FE.2.
In its short life at Farnborough, it was improved and used for experiments with new tailplane, elevator and wing extensions, including flights with the front elevator removed. An altitude of 920 feet was reached and passengers were carried on a number of occasions which included tuition for Lt. Ridge, who was the Assistant Superintendent of the Factory.
Power: 45hp Iris four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled
Data
Span 33 ft
Length 40ft
Area 340 sq. ft
Weight allup 1,100lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DING-SAYERS monoplane (Rowland Ding and W.H. Sayers, Brooklands)
This single-seat canard monoplane was built during 1911 and was tested at Brooklands. It was fitted with a 50hp Gnome engine and was based on Sayers' design of a model biplane which won first prize at the 1911 Olympia Aero Show.
This single-seat canard monoplane was built during 1911 and was tested at Brooklands. It was fitted with a 50hp Gnome engine and was based on Sayers' design of a model biplane which won first prize at the 1911 Olympia Aero Show.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DIXON NIPPER No.l monoplane (H.S. Dixon, 73 Twyford Avenue, Park Royal, W3)
This single-seat, tail first monoplane was built in 1910-1911 and was tested at the London Aviation Ground, Acton, in February 1911. After a number of short, straight flights it was badly damaged, and although Dixon requested assistance for its reconstruction, it was not heard of again. Warping of the wings was controlled by a waist belt and wires by sideways movement. A biplane elevator at the nose and rudders at the wingtips served for pitch and yaw control.
Power: 25hp Advance four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 4in diameter Twining two-bladed pusher propeller.
Data
Span 26ft
Area 210sqft
Length 20ft
Weight allup 530lb
This single-seat, tail first monoplane was built in 1910-1911 and was tested at the London Aviation Ground, Acton, in February 1911. After a number of short, straight flights it was badly damaged, and although Dixon requested assistance for its reconstruction, it was not heard of again. Warping of the wings was controlled by a waist belt and wires by sideways movement. A biplane elevator at the nose and rudders at the wingtips served for pitch and yaw control.
Power: 25hp Advance four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 4in diameter Twining two-bladed pusher propeller.
Data
Span 26ft
Area 210sqft
Length 20ft
Weight allup 530lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DONOVAN monoplane (Donovan Aeroplane Co., West Hartlepool. Built by the Howcroft Carriage Co., Oxford Rd., West Hartlepool)
This machine was built by the Howcroft Company as a result of the initiative of Capt. Joseph Donovan, who interested a group of friends in the project, and who formed a company in May 1909. It was to be a two-seater based on Patent No.21618/1909 taken out by Donovan.
The engine was designed and tested in two-cylinder form by Mr. Harry Fothergill, a trained engineer of Richardson, Westgarth Ltd. The six-cylinder version was completed by Gale's, a local garage.
The machine was an annular wing pusher monoplane with the additional feature of twin contra-rotating lifting screws, a type later described as a 'convertiplane'. The main framework of struts and spars, made of sycamore wood, contained a central platform, above which was mounted the circular canvas wing. The platform provided the mounting for the engine and the operator's station. Power was taken by belts and shafts to the contra-rotating pusher propellers and, at right angles, by a similar arrangement to the lifting blades. The pairs of screws were not coaxial, but were offset from one another, the final drive being by spur gearing to provide contra-rotation.
A tall rudder behind the pusher propeller was pivoted between the top and bottom members of the frame. An elevator, identified as a 'scaling rudder', ahead of the operator, was to be set at an angle of forty-five degrees for takeoff and, with the lifting screws engaged, the machine was intended to take to the air, by a combination of vertical thrust and wing induced lift. When airborne, a clutch could then release the drive to the lifting screws leaving full power available for propulsion. The machine rested on three wheels, the front pair being mounted on two flexible skids, and were designed to be jettisoned after takeoff to save weight. It was envisaged that the wing would act as a parachute to cushion the landing.
Unfortunately Capt. Donovan and his associates had no real appreciation of the design requirements and the aircraft proved to be excessively heavy. It was housed in a shed at Rift House Farm and when brought out for trials on 25 October 1909, failed even to taxi. It was eventually sold for ?35 at auction a year later.
Power: 30hp Fothergill six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 28ft
Weight 1,000lb
This machine was built by the Howcroft Company as a result of the initiative of Capt. Joseph Donovan, who interested a group of friends in the project, and who formed a company in May 1909. It was to be a two-seater based on Patent No.21618/1909 taken out by Donovan.
The engine was designed and tested in two-cylinder form by Mr. Harry Fothergill, a trained engineer of Richardson, Westgarth Ltd. The six-cylinder version was completed by Gale's, a local garage.
The machine was an annular wing pusher monoplane with the additional feature of twin contra-rotating lifting screws, a type later described as a 'convertiplane'. The main framework of struts and spars, made of sycamore wood, contained a central platform, above which was mounted the circular canvas wing. The platform provided the mounting for the engine and the operator's station. Power was taken by belts and shafts to the contra-rotating pusher propellers and, at right angles, by a similar arrangement to the lifting blades. The pairs of screws were not coaxial, but were offset from one another, the final drive being by spur gearing to provide contra-rotation.
A tall rudder behind the pusher propeller was pivoted between the top and bottom members of the frame. An elevator, identified as a 'scaling rudder', ahead of the operator, was to be set at an angle of forty-five degrees for takeoff and, with the lifting screws engaged, the machine was intended to take to the air, by a combination of vertical thrust and wing induced lift. When airborne, a clutch could then release the drive to the lifting screws leaving full power available for propulsion. The machine rested on three wheels, the front pair being mounted on two flexible skids, and were designed to be jettisoned after takeoff to save weight. It was envisaged that the wing would act as a parachute to cushion the landing.
Unfortunately Capt. Donovan and his associates had no real appreciation of the design requirements and the aircraft proved to be excessively heavy. It was housed in a shed at Rift House Farm and when brought out for trials on 25 October 1909, failed even to taxi. It was eventually sold for ?35 at auction a year later.
Power: 30hp Fothergill six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 28ft
Weight 1,000lb
Donovan monoplane with additional contra-rotating propellers for vertical lift of 1909 was a failure. The drawings are from Patent No.21618/1908.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DRUIFF-NEATE Cycloplane
Constructed in 1909 for the designers by Messrs. C.G. Spencer & Co. of Highbury, N London, the machine was pedal powered driving a 4ft diameter propeller, although the fitting of a motor was contemplated. The movable wingtips and tailplane were operated by wires from the handlebar.
Data
Span 20ft
Chord 5ft
Area 100 sq ft
Weight 50 lb
The Car 22 December 1909 (p.264)
Constructed in 1909 for the designers by Messrs. C.G. Spencer & Co. of Highbury, N London, the machine was pedal powered driving a 4ft diameter propeller, although the fitting of a motor was contemplated. The movable wingtips and tailplane were operated by wires from the handlebar.
Data
Span 20ft
Chord 5ft
Area 100 sq ft
Weight 50 lb
The Car 22 December 1909 (p.264)
Druiff-Neate Cycloplane. A pedal-powered machine made for the designers by C.G. Spencer & Co. in 1909.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DUGUE self-propelled monoplanes (Andrew L. Dugue)
Two cycloplanes were designed in autumn 1909. The No.1 machine had a monoplane wing mounted on a bicycle. A rear extension carried a rudder linked to the handlebars and a propeller driven by a system of chains and sprockets linked to the bicycle's pedals. A front extension carried an elevator controlled by a joystick. The No.2 machine was similar in layout but had the airscrew mounted in front of the handlebars.
Two cycloplanes were designed in autumn 1909. The No.1 machine had a monoplane wing mounted on a bicycle. A rear extension carried a rudder linked to the handlebars and a propeller driven by a system of chains and sprockets linked to the bicycle's pedals. A front extension carried an elevator controlled by a joystick. The No.2 machine was similar in layout but had the airscrew mounted in front of the handlebars.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DUNNE aircraft (J.W. Dunne, Lt. and Capt., Balloon/Aircraft Factory, Farnborough 1906-1909. Blair-Atholl Syndicate Ltd., 1 Queen Victoria St., London EC, 1909-1914)
Lt. Dunne was transferred onto halfpay owing to being physically unfit for active service in the Army. He was not a trained engineer but, from 1904, had ideas for aircraft possessing automatic stability. In 1906 he was engaged by Col. Capper to work at the Balloon Factory to develop these ideas, beginning with a glider and later powered aircraft, all relying on swept wings as their main feature. In order to preserve secrecy, when the early machines were ready for trials in 1907-1908, they were taken to Blair Atholl in Scotland with a mainly military team of support personnel.
As a result of economy measures in 1909, Dunne together with Cody, was discharged from Farnborough, being allowed to keep his aircraft, less the engine, when he severed his connection in March. Thereafter the Blair Atholl Syndicate was formed by several titled men of wealth with offices only in the City, the aircraft construction being carried out mainly by Short Bros, at Leysdown or Eastchurch. License arrangements were later concluded to make the aircraft in the U.S.A. by the Burgess Co. of Marblehead. In France a similar arrangement was begun with the Astra Co. but was concluded with Nieuport.
The total number of machines built was small, but included two for the War Office in 1913. It soon became evident that there was no great future for machines of the Dunne type and the Syndicate was liquidated and Dunne withdrew from aeronautical work in May 1914.
DUNNE D.1A biplane glider
This was built at the Balloon Factory in 1906-1907 and taken in a dismantled condition to Blair Atholl for tests, which lasted between July and October 1907. Col. Capper achieved a number of short flights from downhill launches, but the machine was eventually damaged. The glider was an unstaggered biplane with constant chord, swept back wings with negative incidence at the tips, and a drooped trailing edge at the intersection of the wings. There were skids below the center section for landing, but for takeoff the machine rested on a trolley. The pilot was seated on the lower wing and appeared to rely on the inherent stability of the design, as there was no evidence of means of controlling pitch and roll, nor was there a rudder for directional control.
DUNNE D.1B biplane
The original glider had been built with a view to later conversion to become a powered aircraft, and towards the end of the work in Scotland, the conversion of the damaged glider took place. The powerplant was two Buchet 12hp engines mounted coaxially on a tubular frame, driving twin pusher propellers through flat belts, similar to the scheme used later on the D.4. The takeoff was arranged using a track of wooden planks, but on the first attempt in October, the machine veered off and was badly damaged. The pilot may have been Dunne himself or possibly Lt. Westland. This and the onset of winter, caused the party to return to Farnborough.
DUNNE D.3 glider
This was a biplane of hang glider type with swept wings, which was to test features of the D4 powered aircraft, of which it was a smaller version. The component parts were taken to Blair Atholl and erected with some difficulty, between 2 and 19 September 1908. The glider was flown for the first time on 20 September 1908 by Lt. L.D. Gibbs. This officer did most of the gliding in the time that the machine was in use until 16 October 1908, during which period a longest flight of 157ft was achieved.
The top wings had ailerons serving also as elevators, with an auxiliary elevator at the trailing edge of the wing intersection. Two small triangular flaps were fitted later, hinged to the leading edge on either side of the point of the lower wing. These both had straight leading edges and were coupled to the other controls, but were soon discarded after criticism by Lt. Gibbs of their effect on handling.
Data
Area 200 sq ft
Weight 80 lb
DUNNE D.4 biplane
The wings of D. 1 were used to build this machine, in conjunction with a new tubular steel structure incorporating a sprung four wheel undercarriage, also providing the housing for the powerplant. This was a REP fan-type semi-radial, driving a pair of steel pusher propellers through flat belts, one of which was crossed. The transmission incorporated a clutch, and the shafts carrying the belt pulleys were supported at both ends. The propellers, whose blades were adjustable for pitch, were 6ft diameter originally, but were later reduced to 5ft 7in. The wingtip interplane struts were covered in fabric to form side curtains.
The machine seems to have been assembled for the first time at Blair Atholl and trials took place there between 15 November and 4 December 1908. Straight runs only were made reaching a maximum of 40 yards airborne distance.
This was the last machine made by the Balloon Factory and was given to Dunne, less the engine, upon his discharge.
Power: 25hp REP seven-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type semiradial driving twin pusher propellers
Data
Wing area 504 sq ft
Weight allup 1,035 1b
Lt. Dunne was transferred onto halfpay owing to being physically unfit for active service in the Army. He was not a trained engineer but, from 1904, had ideas for aircraft possessing automatic stability. In 1906 he was engaged by Col. Capper to work at the Balloon Factory to develop these ideas, beginning with a glider and later powered aircraft, all relying on swept wings as their main feature. In order to preserve secrecy, when the early machines were ready for trials in 1907-1908, they were taken to Blair Atholl in Scotland with a mainly military team of support personnel.
As a result of economy measures in 1909, Dunne together with Cody, was discharged from Farnborough, being allowed to keep his aircraft, less the engine, when he severed his connection in March. Thereafter the Blair Atholl Syndicate was formed by several titled men of wealth with offices only in the City, the aircraft construction being carried out mainly by Short Bros, at Leysdown or Eastchurch. License arrangements were later concluded to make the aircraft in the U.S.A. by the Burgess Co. of Marblehead. In France a similar arrangement was begun with the Astra Co. but was concluded with Nieuport.
The total number of machines built was small, but included two for the War Office in 1913. It soon became evident that there was no great future for machines of the Dunne type and the Syndicate was liquidated and Dunne withdrew from aeronautical work in May 1914.
DUNNE D.1A biplane glider
This was built at the Balloon Factory in 1906-1907 and taken in a dismantled condition to Blair Atholl for tests, which lasted between July and October 1907. Col. Capper achieved a number of short flights from downhill launches, but the machine was eventually damaged. The glider was an unstaggered biplane with constant chord, swept back wings with negative incidence at the tips, and a drooped trailing edge at the intersection of the wings. There were skids below the center section for landing, but for takeoff the machine rested on a trolley. The pilot was seated on the lower wing and appeared to rely on the inherent stability of the design, as there was no evidence of means of controlling pitch and roll, nor was there a rudder for directional control.
DUNNE D.1B biplane
The original glider had been built with a view to later conversion to become a powered aircraft, and towards the end of the work in Scotland, the conversion of the damaged glider took place. The powerplant was two Buchet 12hp engines mounted coaxially on a tubular frame, driving twin pusher propellers through flat belts, similar to the scheme used later on the D.4. The takeoff was arranged using a track of wooden planks, but on the first attempt in October, the machine veered off and was badly damaged. The pilot may have been Dunne himself or possibly Lt. Westland. This and the onset of winter, caused the party to return to Farnborough.
DUNNE D.3 glider
This was a biplane of hang glider type with swept wings, which was to test features of the D4 powered aircraft, of which it was a smaller version. The component parts were taken to Blair Atholl and erected with some difficulty, between 2 and 19 September 1908. The glider was flown for the first time on 20 September 1908 by Lt. L.D. Gibbs. This officer did most of the gliding in the time that the machine was in use until 16 October 1908, during which period a longest flight of 157ft was achieved.
The top wings had ailerons serving also as elevators, with an auxiliary elevator at the trailing edge of the wing intersection. Two small triangular flaps were fitted later, hinged to the leading edge on either side of the point of the lower wing. These both had straight leading edges and were coupled to the other controls, but were soon discarded after criticism by Lt. Gibbs of their effect on handling.
Data
Area 200 sq ft
Weight 80 lb
DUNNE D.4 biplane
The wings of D. 1 were used to build this machine, in conjunction with a new tubular steel structure incorporating a sprung four wheel undercarriage, also providing the housing for the powerplant. This was a REP fan-type semi-radial, driving a pair of steel pusher propellers through flat belts, one of which was crossed. The transmission incorporated a clutch, and the shafts carrying the belt pulleys were supported at both ends. The propellers, whose blades were adjustable for pitch, were 6ft diameter originally, but were later reduced to 5ft 7in. The wingtip interplane struts were covered in fabric to form side curtains.
The machine seems to have been assembled for the first time at Blair Atholl and trials took place there between 15 November and 4 December 1908. Straight runs only were made reaching a maximum of 40 yards airborne distance.
This was the last machine made by the Balloon Factory and was given to Dunne, less the engine, upon his discharge.
Power: 25hp REP seven-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type semiradial driving twin pusher propellers
Data
Wing area 504 sq ft
Weight allup 1,035 1b
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DUNNE D.5 biplane
Dunne went on to prepare the design of the first machine after he had left Farnborough. He made arrangements, with C.R. Fairey as his assistant, for Short Bros, to make the machine at Leysdown, from whence it was taken to Eastchurch to fly in the spring of 1910. Dunne flew the machine himself for a distance of 2 1/4 miles on 27 May 1910. It continued in use until the following year, when it was wrecked by an inexperienced pilot.
The wing design of D.5 followed the line of development pursued by Dunne to achieve automatic stability, incorporating negative incidence and reducing gap towards the tips. The wings were divided into four bays, with radiators on the inboard, and side curtains on the outboard interplane struts. The hinged flaps at the tips of the top wing combined all the control functions.
The single-seater fuselage was extended well aft and was covered along its length, and was constructed around the tubular structure comprising the engine and outboard propeller shaft mountings. The machine rested on a substantial undercarriage with twin main wheels and a tailwheel with skid, all sprung independently. Twin nosewheels controlled the initial attitude on takeoff, but were later removed.
Power:
60hp Green four-cylinder, water-cooled inline driving two 7ft diameter propellers through chains, sprockets and shafts.
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee was also reported fitted
Data
Span 46ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft at center
Angle of sweep 32 degrees at leading edge
Area 552 sq ft including elevons
Length of fuselage 18ft
Overall length 20ft 4 l/2in
Dunne went on to prepare the design of the first machine after he had left Farnborough. He made arrangements, with C.R. Fairey as his assistant, for Short Bros, to make the machine at Leysdown, from whence it was taken to Eastchurch to fly in the spring of 1910. Dunne flew the machine himself for a distance of 2 1/4 miles on 27 May 1910. It continued in use until the following year, when it was wrecked by an inexperienced pilot.
The wing design of D.5 followed the line of development pursued by Dunne to achieve automatic stability, incorporating negative incidence and reducing gap towards the tips. The wings were divided into four bays, with radiators on the inboard, and side curtains on the outboard interplane struts. The hinged flaps at the tips of the top wing combined all the control functions.
The single-seater fuselage was extended well aft and was covered along its length, and was constructed around the tubular structure comprising the engine and outboard propeller shaft mountings. The machine rested on a substantial undercarriage with twin main wheels and a tailwheel with skid, all sprung independently. Twin nosewheels controlled the initial attitude on takeoff, but were later removed.
Power:
60hp Green four-cylinder, water-cooled inline driving two 7ft diameter propellers through chains, sprockets and shafts.
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee was also reported fitted
Data
Span 46ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft at center
Angle of sweep 32 degrees at leading edge
Area 552 sq ft including elevons
Length of fuselage 18ft
Overall length 20ft 4 l/2in
Dunne D5 at Eastchurch in 1910 after modifications to the undercarriage and removal of the nosewheel.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DUNNE D.6 monoplane
A new version of the monoplane was described and illustrated in Flight 24 June 1911 (p.542-545) and was reported to be undergoing trials at Eastchurch. The wing was of similar type to that used earlier on Capper's monoplane, but the fuselage structure was considerably changed.
The main tubular structure was built of two vertical frames 9ft 6in apart, with cross members between, on which an open wooden structure housed the pilot, tanks and engine.
The wing was attached to the four vertical members of the frame, which extended above to form kingposts for the bracing wires. The radiator was mounted vertically above the centerline. The machine was a single-seater and was built by Short Bros.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a 7ft 3in diameter pusher propeller
Data
Span 36ft
Length 21ft
Chord 6ft 3in tapering to 5ft
Height lift
Area 248 sq ft. including ailerons/elevators
DUNNE D.7 Auto-Safety monoplane
This lighter and smaller machine was exhibited incomplete on the stand of the Blair Atholl Syndicate in March 1911 at the Aero Show at Olympia, placarded as being built to the order of Col. J.E. Capper. The general configuration was similar to the D.6, whose appearance it preceded. It was a reconstruction of the Dunne-Capper monoplane by Short Bros., with Fairey acting for the Blair Atholl Syndicate. Capper had decided in February that his machine should be modified and it was still being worked on when the show opened on 24 March 1911.
The D.7. was tested in June 1911 at Eastchurch and was still airworthy in the early part of 1912. On 12 January 1912 Dunne flew the machine to demonstrate its stability to Alec Ogilvie and T. O'Brien Hubbard of the Aeronautical Society, during which he wrote a note while the aircraft was flying 'hands-off at 60mph.
Power 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a pusher propeller.
Data
Span 35ft
Weight 1,0501b
Area 200 sq ft
Weight allup 1,4091b
Speed 60mph
DUNNE D.7 bis monoplane
This was the conversion of the original D.6 to a two-seater with air-cooled engine. It followed the general configuration of the earlier machine but had an additional flap, centrally mounted to improve pitch control.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a pusher propeller.
Data
Span 35ft
Area 200 sq ft
Weight 1,2001b
Weight allup 1,7281b
Speed 60 mph
A new version of the monoplane was described and illustrated in Flight 24 June 1911 (p.542-545) and was reported to be undergoing trials at Eastchurch. The wing was of similar type to that used earlier on Capper's monoplane, but the fuselage structure was considerably changed.
The main tubular structure was built of two vertical frames 9ft 6in apart, with cross members between, on which an open wooden structure housed the pilot, tanks and engine.
The wing was attached to the four vertical members of the frame, which extended above to form kingposts for the bracing wires. The radiator was mounted vertically above the centerline. The machine was a single-seater and was built by Short Bros.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a 7ft 3in diameter pusher propeller
Data
Span 36ft
Length 21ft
Chord 6ft 3in tapering to 5ft
Height lift
Area 248 sq ft. including ailerons/elevators
DUNNE D.7 Auto-Safety monoplane
This lighter and smaller machine was exhibited incomplete on the stand of the Blair Atholl Syndicate in March 1911 at the Aero Show at Olympia, placarded as being built to the order of Col. J.E. Capper. The general configuration was similar to the D.6, whose appearance it preceded. It was a reconstruction of the Dunne-Capper monoplane by Short Bros., with Fairey acting for the Blair Atholl Syndicate. Capper had decided in February that his machine should be modified and it was still being worked on when the show opened on 24 March 1911.
The D.7. was tested in June 1911 at Eastchurch and was still airworthy in the early part of 1912. On 12 January 1912 Dunne flew the machine to demonstrate its stability to Alec Ogilvie and T. O'Brien Hubbard of the Aeronautical Society, during which he wrote a note while the aircraft was flying 'hands-off at 60mph.
Power 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a pusher propeller.
Data
Span 35ft
Weight 1,0501b
Area 200 sq ft
Weight allup 1,4091b
Speed 60mph
DUNNE D.7 bis monoplane
This was the conversion of the original D.6 to a two-seater with air-cooled engine. It followed the general configuration of the earlier machine but had an additional flap, centrally mounted to improve pitch control.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a pusher propeller.
Data
Span 35ft
Area 200 sq ft
Weight 1,2001b
Weight allup 1,7281b
Speed 60 mph
Dunne D7 Auto-Safety monoplane was a smaller version of D6 built for Col. Capper and here seen exhibited at the 1911 Aero Show at Olympia.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DUNNE D.8 and D.8bis biplanes
The first of these was a rebuild of the original D.5 but with a propeller driven direct by the engine, replacing the twin propeller arrangement. Some of the weight saved was offset by a most complex steel tube undercarriage structure with narrow track wheels and front and rear skids, supplemented by sprang wing tip skids.
Dunne was flying the D.8, still with Green engine and the D.7bis monoplane, at Eastchurch in June 1912 after a long illness. Capt. Carden and N.S. Percival also flew the machine in 1912 and 1913. The former obtained his pilot's certificate on it and purchased the machine, although it was subsequently bought back by the Syndicate.
The Dunne biplane was present at Larkhill in August 1912 during the Military Trials although not as an entry; it still had a Green engine with a single four-bladed propeller. The indications are that it was a partial conversion from the D.5 before the Gnome, which became the standard power plant, was fitted.
A second D.8 was assembled at Hendon and flew on 18 October 1913 in the hands of the French pilot, Commandant Felix. It was he who had flown the first D.8 to Villacoublay from Eastchurch on 11-12 August 1912 for demonstrations in France in connection with the Nieuport license, which followed the earlier interest of the Astra company. Nieuport produced a machine with a simplified undercarriage, in time to exhibit it at the Paris Show in December 1912.
The War Office ordered two D.8 aircraft, referred to by Dunne as D.8bis, in March 1913, one was canceled due to late delivery, the remaining aircraft arrived at Farnborough in March 1914 and was identified with the serial No.366. The exact number of the type built is uncertain. There is a reference to a Green-engined machine in 1913, but this may have been confused with the D.8 at Larkhill in 1912.
Apart from the undercarriage changes, on the second machine onwards, the shape of the side curtains was altered, eliminating the rectangular cutout at the top and tapering the outline at both top and bottom. The control surfaces in the top wings of the D.8 were increased to four, although each pair apparently worked in unison, but were still capable of being moved differentially for control of roll and yaw. The later machines also had the nacelle extended further forward.
Power:
50 and 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 2in diameter Integrale propeller.
60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a four-bladed propeller.
Data
Span 46ft
Angle of sweep 30 degrees at leading edge
Chord 6ft
Area 545 sq ft
Length 25ft 9in
Weight 1,400 lb (1,900 lb with Green)
Weight allup 1,900 lb (2,114 lb with Green)
Max speed 56 mph
DUNNE D.10 biplane
The D.10 was a variant of the D.8 and was a two-seater with 80hp Gnome built in 1912, but later converted to D.8 standard.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 45ft
Area 448 sq ft
Weight allup 2,202lb
Max speed 50 mph
The first of these was a rebuild of the original D.5 but with a propeller driven direct by the engine, replacing the twin propeller arrangement. Some of the weight saved was offset by a most complex steel tube undercarriage structure with narrow track wheels and front and rear skids, supplemented by sprang wing tip skids.
Dunne was flying the D.8, still with Green engine and the D.7bis monoplane, at Eastchurch in June 1912 after a long illness. Capt. Carden and N.S. Percival also flew the machine in 1912 and 1913. The former obtained his pilot's certificate on it and purchased the machine, although it was subsequently bought back by the Syndicate.
The Dunne biplane was present at Larkhill in August 1912 during the Military Trials although not as an entry; it still had a Green engine with a single four-bladed propeller. The indications are that it was a partial conversion from the D.5 before the Gnome, which became the standard power plant, was fitted.
A second D.8 was assembled at Hendon and flew on 18 October 1913 in the hands of the French pilot, Commandant Felix. It was he who had flown the first D.8 to Villacoublay from Eastchurch on 11-12 August 1912 for demonstrations in France in connection with the Nieuport license, which followed the earlier interest of the Astra company. Nieuport produced a machine with a simplified undercarriage, in time to exhibit it at the Paris Show in December 1912.
The War Office ordered two D.8 aircraft, referred to by Dunne as D.8bis, in March 1913, one was canceled due to late delivery, the remaining aircraft arrived at Farnborough in March 1914 and was identified with the serial No.366. The exact number of the type built is uncertain. There is a reference to a Green-engined machine in 1913, but this may have been confused with the D.8 at Larkhill in 1912.
Apart from the undercarriage changes, on the second machine onwards, the shape of the side curtains was altered, eliminating the rectangular cutout at the top and tapering the outline at both top and bottom. The control surfaces in the top wings of the D.8 were increased to four, although each pair apparently worked in unison, but were still capable of being moved differentially for control of roll and yaw. The later machines also had the nacelle extended further forward.
Power:
50 and 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 2in diameter Integrale propeller.
60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a four-bladed propeller.
Data
Span 46ft
Angle of sweep 30 degrees at leading edge
Chord 6ft
Area 545 sq ft
Length 25ft 9in
Weight 1,400 lb (1,900 lb with Green)
Weight allup 1,900 lb (2,114 lb with Green)
Max speed 56 mph
DUNNE D.10 biplane
The D.10 was a variant of the D.8 and was a two-seater with 80hp Gnome built in 1912, but later converted to D.8 standard.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 45ft
Area 448 sq ft
Weight allup 2,202lb
Max speed 50 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DUNNE D.9 monoplane (Also referred to as the James monoplane)
This was a tailless pusher design of almost delta wing form. It was a single-seater with a protective cage above the cockpit, serving also as an anchorage for the bracing wires. The wheels on the twin skid undercarriage were covered by fairings. The power plant was a 35hp Levis five-cylinder inline two-stroke engine designed by H. Newey, mounted inverted in the nose, and driving the propeller by extension shaft.
Dunne was assisted by C.R. Fairey with the stressing and the machine was constructed in 1913 for a Mr. James by Levis Ltd. of Stechford, Warwickshire, motorcycle manufacturers. The name 'Leonie' and the initials 'AB', probably of Arthur Butterfield, one of the directors of Levis, were painted on the wheel covers.
The machine was wrecked on its first attempt at flight by hitting an obstruction on a playing field at Castle Bromwich, forestalling the proposal to fit floats for later trials on Edgbaston Reservoir.
This was a tailless pusher design of almost delta wing form. It was a single-seater with a protective cage above the cockpit, serving also as an anchorage for the bracing wires. The wheels on the twin skid undercarriage were covered by fairings. The power plant was a 35hp Levis five-cylinder inline two-stroke engine designed by H. Newey, mounted inverted in the nose, and driving the propeller by extension shaft.
Dunne was assisted by C.R. Fairey with the stressing and the machine was constructed in 1913 for a Mr. James by Levis Ltd. of Stechford, Warwickshire, motorcycle manufacturers. The name 'Leonie' and the initials 'AB', probably of Arthur Butterfield, one of the directors of Levis, were painted on the wheel covers.
The machine was wrecked on its first attempt at flight by hitting an obstruction on a playing field at Castle Bromwich, forestalling the proposal to fit floats for later trials on Edgbaston Reservoir.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DUNNE-CAPPER monoplane glider
As early as 1905 Dunne had made a model of a monoplane, the design of which was submitted to the War Office and rejected. A full size glider version of this was made at Farnborough in 1907 under Col. Capper's authority. It is believed to have been tested at Blair Atholl, unsuccessfully by Capper, at the end of August during the first official expedition.
The glider was a parasol monoplane with swept wing and down turned wingtips, which was mounted on a structure of two A-frames, joined by longitudinal members, on which the pilot was supported by his arms, control being effected by weight shift.
DUNNE-CAPPER monoplane
When designing his early monoplane, Dunne required a 10-12hp engine, but nothing of suitable weight was available, consequently work proceeded on the machine as the glider previously referred to.
It was not until 5 January 1911 that Capper's monoplane with Green engine was reported undergoing tests on Salisbury Plain (Larkhill) handled by Lt. Cammell. In the week ending 14 January further tests were carried out, in which Col. Capper participated. The machine could not be made to lift and Capper decided that further changes were required.
In its new form the fuselage consisted of three A-frames, at the lower ends of which, a four wheeled undercarriage and twin skids were fitted. A third skid was fitted forward of these. The pilot and engine were mounted on a floor formed on the crossbars of the A-frames, with a radiator mounted outboard on the port side. The parasol wing, which was attached at the top of the A-frames, was well braced to these, and by additional cables, to three kingposts.
Parts from the glider, probably the complete wing, were reported to have been used in its construction, which was largely the work of C.R. Fairey and was carried out at Larkhill.
As early as 1905 Dunne had made a model of a monoplane, the design of which was submitted to the War Office and rejected. A full size glider version of this was made at Farnborough in 1907 under Col. Capper's authority. It is believed to have been tested at Blair Atholl, unsuccessfully by Capper, at the end of August during the first official expedition.
The glider was a parasol monoplane with swept wing and down turned wingtips, which was mounted on a structure of two A-frames, joined by longitudinal members, on which the pilot was supported by his arms, control being effected by weight shift.
DUNNE-CAPPER monoplane
When designing his early monoplane, Dunne required a 10-12hp engine, but nothing of suitable weight was available, consequently work proceeded on the machine as the glider previously referred to.
It was not until 5 January 1911 that Capper's monoplane with Green engine was reported undergoing tests on Salisbury Plain (Larkhill) handled by Lt. Cammell. In the week ending 14 January further tests were carried out, in which Col. Capper participated. The machine could not be made to lift and Capper decided that further changes were required.
In its new form the fuselage consisted of three A-frames, at the lower ends of which, a four wheeled undercarriage and twin skids were fitted. A third skid was fitted forward of these. The pilot and engine were mounted on a floor formed on the crossbars of the A-frames, with a radiator mounted outboard on the port side. The parasol wing, which was attached at the top of the A-frames, was well braced to these, and by additional cables, to three kingposts.
Parts from the glider, probably the complete wing, were reported to have been used in its construction, which was largely the work of C.R. Fairey and was carried out at Larkhill.
The Dunne-Capper monoplane was evolved from Col. Capper's glider at Larkhill and was first tested in January 1911 but could not be made to lift off.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DUNNE-HUNTINGTON triplane
This unusual machine, variously referred to as a triplane, a biplane or a monoplane, was basically designed by Dunne during the winter of 1907-1908. The layout was passed to Professor Huntington, an active member of the Aero Club, to complete the detailed drawings. The machine was built by Short Bros, at Leysdown, and after a long gestation period, was flying at Eastchurch in April 1910. It went through a number of changes, and was still flying well in April 1913, its original design by this time being quite outdated.
When operating at Eastchurch in early 1910, the open fuselage structure was originally mounted on a three wheeled chassis and skid plus a tailwheel; later the nosewheel was removed and replaced by two semicircular skids at the front. The front wing was mounted at the nose and had considerable sweep back. On the same level, at the rear end, was a wing of parallel chord, with anhedral on the outboard section. This was also split diagonally to form triangular flaps for control in roll and pitch. The top wing was mounted above the central fuselage and braced to it by struts, and to the rear wing by vertical struts at the leading edge; also by raked struts to the front where the anhedral began. The area between the staggered struts was, at one time, filled in to form side curtains. The pilot was seated well forward of the biplane wings in the inner apex of the vee shaped front wing.
The engine was a Wolseley water-cooled unit mounted in the center, with the radiator placed well behind. It drove the twin tractor propellers through chains and shafts. A Gnome rotary replaced this heavy installation in 1912, in which form the machine was reported to reach 43 mph.
Power:
50hp Wolseley eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving twin tractor propellers.
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 59ft
Chord 10ft
Length 50ft
This unusual machine, variously referred to as a triplane, a biplane or a monoplane, was basically designed by Dunne during the winter of 1907-1908. The layout was passed to Professor Huntington, an active member of the Aero Club, to complete the detailed drawings. The machine was built by Short Bros, at Leysdown, and after a long gestation period, was flying at Eastchurch in April 1910. It went through a number of changes, and was still flying well in April 1913, its original design by this time being quite outdated.
When operating at Eastchurch in early 1910, the open fuselage structure was originally mounted on a three wheeled chassis and skid plus a tailwheel; later the nosewheel was removed and replaced by two semicircular skids at the front. The front wing was mounted at the nose and had considerable sweep back. On the same level, at the rear end, was a wing of parallel chord, with anhedral on the outboard section. This was also split diagonally to form triangular flaps for control in roll and pitch. The top wing was mounted above the central fuselage and braced to it by struts, and to the rear wing by vertical struts at the leading edge; also by raked struts to the front where the anhedral began. The area between the staggered struts was, at one time, filled in to form side curtains. The pilot was seated well forward of the biplane wings in the inner apex of the vee shaped front wing.
The engine was a Wolseley water-cooled unit mounted in the center, with the radiator placed well behind. It drove the twin tractor propellers through chains and shafts. A Gnome rotary replaced this heavy installation in 1912, in which form the machine was reported to reach 43 mph.
Power:
50hp Wolseley eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving twin tractor propellers.
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 59ft
Chord 10ft
Length 50ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DYOTT monoplane (George M. Dyott)
This small single seater was completed in early 1913 by Hewlett and Blondeau Ltd., of Clapham Junction, London SW, to the design of G.M. Dyott. Soon after its initial flight tests he took it to the U.S.A. for a tour lasting six months. Dyott returned with the machine to Hendon in October, and in November it overturned at Beachy Head during the London to Brighton Race and was damaged. It was repaired and in 1914 was taken over by the Admiralty as serial No. 1598.
Dyott entered the Royal Navy, but before the war had also designed a large twin-engined machine, two of which were completed in 1916 for the Admiralty by Hewlett and Blondeau.
The monoplane was a handsome machine designed for easy assembly and servicing and it performed well on its small Gnome engine. The lateral control was by wing warping and the wing bracing wires were carried to a pylon of vee-shape above the fuselage and to the undercarriage below; the latter being a point of criticism. The cockpit was well furnished with instruments, including a control movement recorder of Dyott's own design.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 29ft
Chord 5ft 10in
Area 148sqft
Area tailplane 14 sq ft
Area elevators 12 sq ft
Area rudder 4 sq ft
Length 23ft
Speed 45-75 mph
Endurance 3hr
This small single seater was completed in early 1913 by Hewlett and Blondeau Ltd., of Clapham Junction, London SW, to the design of G.M. Dyott. Soon after its initial flight tests he took it to the U.S.A. for a tour lasting six months. Dyott returned with the machine to Hendon in October, and in November it overturned at Beachy Head during the London to Brighton Race and was damaged. It was repaired and in 1914 was taken over by the Admiralty as serial No. 1598.
Dyott entered the Royal Navy, but before the war had also designed a large twin-engined machine, two of which were completed in 1916 for the Admiralty by Hewlett and Blondeau.
The monoplane was a handsome machine designed for easy assembly and servicing and it performed well on its small Gnome engine. The lateral control was by wing warping and the wing bracing wires were carried to a pylon of vee-shape above the fuselage and to the undercarriage below; the latter being a point of criticism. The cockpit was well furnished with instruments, including a control movement recorder of Dyott's own design.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 29ft
Chord 5ft 10in
Area 148sqft
Area tailplane 14 sq ft
Area elevators 12 sq ft
Area rudder 4 sq ft
Length 23ft
Speed 45-75 mph
Endurance 3hr
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
DYOTT monoplane (George M. Dyott)
<...>
Dyott entered the Royal Navy, but before the war had also designed a large twin-engined machine, two of which were completed in 1916 for the Admiralty by Hewlett and Blondeau.
<...>
<...>
Dyott entered the Royal Navy, but before the war had also designed a large twin-engined machine, two of which were completed in 1916 for the Admiralty by Hewlett and Blondeau.
<...>
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EAST GRINSTEAD BOY SCOUTS glider (Patrol Leaders Smith and Beard)
This glider, of Chanute type, was constructed by the Scouts in 1912. It had a span of 20ft and achieved flights up to 25ft high and 200ft long.
This glider, of Chanute type, was constructed by the Scouts in 1912. It had a span of 20ft and achieved flights up to 25ft high and 200ft long.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EAST LONDON AERO CLUB glider
This club proposed to build a glider based on the Valkyrie design. A sketch appeared in The Aero of 22 March 1911 (p.249), but there were no further reports.
This club proposed to build a glider based on the Valkyrie design. A sketch appeared in The Aero of 22 March 1911 (p.249), but there were no further reports.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EASTBOURNE AVIATION Co. Ltd. (KB. Fowler, Managing Director; E.L. Gassier, Chief Designer, St. Anthony's Hill, Eastbourne, Sussex)
This was one of the small manufacturers, which evolved from a flying training school established by F.B. Fowler in 1911, with himself as instructor. Mon E.L. Gassier was a Swiss pupil, who continued with the company as chief designer and pilot.
Monoplane
This was a single-seat monoplane of conventional design, built during 1913. No fin was fitted and lateral control was by ailerons. It was intended for advanced pupils and private owner use, but only one was built because of lack of demand due to the impending war.
Power: 35hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan-type radial.
Data
Span 29ft.2in.
Chord 4ft 11 in
Area 135 sq ft
Area tailplane 14 sqft
Area elevator 10 sq ft
Area rudder 7 sq ft
Length 21ft
Height 8ft in flying attitude
This was one of the small manufacturers, which evolved from a flying training school established by F.B. Fowler in 1911, with himself as instructor. Mon E.L. Gassier was a Swiss pupil, who continued with the company as chief designer and pilot.
Monoplane
This was a single-seat monoplane of conventional design, built during 1913. No fin was fitted and lateral control was by ailerons. It was intended for advanced pupils and private owner use, but only one was built because of lack of demand due to the impending war.
Power: 35hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan-type radial.
Data
Span 29ft.2in.
Chord 4ft 11 in
Area 135 sq ft
Area tailplane 14 sqft
Area elevator 10 sq ft
Area rudder 7 sq ft
Length 21ft
Height 8ft in flying attitude
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
Biplane
This single-seater was completed in February 1914, to the order of Lt. R.E.B. Hunt and was for exhibition flying. It was in use at Eastbourne until just before the outbreak of war.
The design, by Gassier, was of a simple unstaggered two bay biplane with warping top wing. The overhang of the wing was braced from kingposts, in line with the outboard interplane struts. The front struts were connected to the front spar, which lay along the leading edge. The lower wing was of parallel chord, but the trailing edge of the top wing tapered from a cutaway center section, but changed to become parallel over the warpable length of the span.
The four wheel undercarriage included twin skids, joined by struts to the bottom longerons. There was no fin and the rudder was unbalanced. The engine was a 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary, enclosed in a circular cowling, cutaway at the lower quarter.
Data
Cruising speed 65 mph
This single-seater was completed in February 1914, to the order of Lt. R.E.B. Hunt and was for exhibition flying. It was in use at Eastbourne until just before the outbreak of war.
The design, by Gassier, was of a simple unstaggered two bay biplane with warping top wing. The overhang of the wing was braced from kingposts, in line with the outboard interplane struts. The front struts were connected to the front spar, which lay along the leading edge. The lower wing was of parallel chord, but the trailing edge of the top wing tapered from a cutaway center section, but changed to become parallel over the warpable length of the span.
The four wheel undercarriage included twin skids, joined by struts to the bottom longerons. There was no fin and the rudder was unbalanced. The engine was a 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary, enclosed in a circular cowling, cutaway at the lower quarter.
Data
Cruising speed 65 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
Circuit biplane
The Daily Mail Seaplane Circuit of Britain, which was due to be held in August 1914, was prevented by the outbreak of war. The EAC aircraft, built to compete as No.5, was to be flown by F.B. Fowler and was also sponsored by Frank Hucks.
The aircraft was a twin tractor biplane with the engine buried in the fuselage. This drove the two propellers, which were mounted on the first pair of interplane struts, through shafts and bevel gearing. The deep fuselage provided accommodation for two crew, seated side by side, in the open cockpit ahead of the wings, and was large enough for one other crew member just behind, with space for a further man beside the engine.
The three bay wings were parallel in chord and of equal span with three degrees of dihedral on the lower. Control was by normal ailerons, elevators and rudder. There was no fixed fin, although provision to increase the side area, both above and below the fuselage, was made if found necessary as a result of trials.
The twin floats, with a single step and air ventilated, were spaced wide apart and of such proportions that wingtip and tail floats were unnecessary.
There were reports of problems with distortion of the struts mounting the two propellers and although the machine was still at Eastbourne at the end of the year, there was no indication that it had ever flown, and it was dismantled later.
Power: 100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving twin-tractor propellers 8ft 2in diameter by shafts in torque tubes, and bevel gearing.
Data
Span 54ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 700 sq ft
Length 31ft
Height lift 6in
Floats length 19ft
Floats beam 2ft
Spacing at centerline 12ft
Endurance 7hr
Weight 1,850lb
Weight allup 2,500 lb
Speed range 45-65 mph
The Daily Mail Seaplane Circuit of Britain, which was due to be held in August 1914, was prevented by the outbreak of war. The EAC aircraft, built to compete as No.5, was to be flown by F.B. Fowler and was also sponsored by Frank Hucks.
The aircraft was a twin tractor biplane with the engine buried in the fuselage. This drove the two propellers, which were mounted on the first pair of interplane struts, through shafts and bevel gearing. The deep fuselage provided accommodation for two crew, seated side by side, in the open cockpit ahead of the wings, and was large enough for one other crew member just behind, with space for a further man beside the engine.
The three bay wings were parallel in chord and of equal span with three degrees of dihedral on the lower. Control was by normal ailerons, elevators and rudder. There was no fixed fin, although provision to increase the side area, both above and below the fuselage, was made if found necessary as a result of trials.
The twin floats, with a single step and air ventilated, were spaced wide apart and of such proportions that wingtip and tail floats were unnecessary.
There were reports of problems with distortion of the struts mounting the two propellers and although the machine was still at Eastbourne at the end of the year, there was no indication that it had ever flown, and it was dismantled later.
Power: 100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving twin-tractor propellers 8ft 2in diameter by shafts in torque tubes, and bevel gearing.
Data
Span 54ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 700 sq ft
Length 31ft
Height lift 6in
Floats length 19ft
Floats beam 2ft
Spacing at centerline 12ft
Endurance 7hr
Weight 1,850lb
Weight allup 2,500 lb
Speed range 45-65 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
Military biplane
The Military biplane, designed by M. Gassier, was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1914. Quick assembly and dismantling for transport were a feature, and included hinges enabling the tailplane to fold down against the fuselage. The use of bolts and quick release cable fittings enabled the wings to be removed and packed flat for transport.
The machine itself was a conventional unstaggered biplane, with large gap and top wing extensions. The top wing was carried on four steel struts of streamlined section. These were splayed to clear the cockpit area, which was a single opening, with the pilot in front and passenger behind. A starting handle was provided in the pilot's cockpit.
The engine was totally enclosed, except for the lower quarter, with a rather flat fronted circular cowl. The rear undercarriage struts, also of streamlined steel tubes, were extended forward to form short skids.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 2in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 34 ft 6 in
Area 245 sq ft
Weight 950 lb
Length 25 ft
Speed range 50-75 mph
The Military biplane, designed by M. Gassier, was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1914. Quick assembly and dismantling for transport were a feature, and included hinges enabling the tailplane to fold down against the fuselage. The use of bolts and quick release cable fittings enabled the wings to be removed and packed flat for transport.
The machine itself was a conventional unstaggered biplane, with large gap and top wing extensions. The top wing was carried on four steel struts of streamlined section. These were splayed to clear the cockpit area, which was a single opening, with the pilot in front and passenger behind. A starting handle was provided in the pilot's cockpit.
The engine was totally enclosed, except for the lower quarter, with a rather flat fronted circular cowl. The rear undercarriage struts, also of streamlined steel tubes, were extended forward to form short skids.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 2in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 34 ft 6 in
Area 245 sq ft
Weight 950 lb
Length 25 ft
Speed range 50-75 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EDGAR glider (Norman W. Edgar, Bristol)
Flown by members of the Bristol and West of England Aero Club, this biplane glider was built during 1913 with the intention of fitting a light engine later. However the wing area was found to be inadequate and the intention was not realized.
It was a sesquiplane with twin booms, parallel in plan, carrying the tailplane and rudder, and was mounted on an undercarriage with two motorcycle wheels and skids.
Data
Span 26ft
Length 21ft
Area 170 sq ft
Chord 4ft 7in
Flown by members of the Bristol and West of England Aero Club, this biplane glider was built during 1913 with the intention of fitting a light engine later. However the wing area was found to be inadequate and the intention was not realized.
It was a sesquiplane with twin booms, parallel in plan, carrying the tailplane and rudder, and was mounted on an undercarriage with two motorcycle wheels and skids.
Data
Span 26ft
Length 21ft
Area 170 sq ft
Chord 4ft 7in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EDINBURGH cycle biplane
A letter in The Aero of 21 September 1909 (p.298), referred to a self-propelled machine constructed near Edinburgh and also gave a sketch. It was based on a bicycle and was, no doubt, the machine reported earlier to be on test at Colinton Mains.
Data
Span 18ft
Length 20ft
A letter in The Aero of 21 September 1909 (p.298), referred to a self-propelled machine constructed near Edinburgh and also gave a sketch. It was based on a bicycle and was, no doubt, the machine reported earlier to be on test at Colinton Mains.
Data
Span 18ft
Length 20ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EDWARDS Rhomboidal biplane. (Walton & Edwards Aeroplane Co., Shed 37, Brooklands)
First described in Flight on 5 February 1910 (p.87-90), and reported to be backed by a large automobile firm, believed to be Humber, the Rhomboidal made its first appearance at Brooklands on 11 March 1911. It was not until June that attempts to taxi or to fly were made. On 27 June 1911 the pilot, named Martin Rucker, lost control and ran across a ditch onto the racing track, causing severe damage to the machine. There were no further reports and it was apparently not repaired.
This most unusual form of annular biplane was built around two triangular section longitudinal girders, built up from wooden sections, and was wire braced. The lower girder provided the mounting for the engine and seat for the pilot, and rested on splayed struts, which were the main undercarriage members. These were wire braced and carried twin skids and two pairs of wheels. A nose wheel was mounted at the extreme front and a skid at the rear end.
The wings, in plan, were in the form of a rhomboid or open diamond shape. The structure for these consisted of builtup spars of streamlined section, at top and bottom, and at right angles to the main girders, with interplane struts between. The shape of the wings was maintained by tension cables along the leading edges and curved battens across the chord, but the trailing edges were allowed to remain flexible. Bracing wires from the top and bottom wingtips were taken down to the undercarriage structure. The twin tractor propellers were mounted on shafts on outriggers and were extensively braced by cables to the main structure.
Elevators and a rudder were mounted at the tail, but reliance was placed on wing dihedral for lateral balance.
Power:
50hp Humber four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving by chains twin tractor 8ft diameter propellers.
60hp Green, four-cylinder inline, water-cooled from June 1911.
Data
Span 38ft
Chord 3ft front areas 9ft rear areas
Area 1,200 sq ft
Length 48ft
Height 14 ft 11 in (16ft 10in to top of rudder)
Weight 1,600lb
Dihedral 8 degrees
First described in Flight on 5 February 1910 (p.87-90), and reported to be backed by a large automobile firm, believed to be Humber, the Rhomboidal made its first appearance at Brooklands on 11 March 1911. It was not until June that attempts to taxi or to fly were made. On 27 June 1911 the pilot, named Martin Rucker, lost control and ran across a ditch onto the racing track, causing severe damage to the machine. There were no further reports and it was apparently not repaired.
This most unusual form of annular biplane was built around two triangular section longitudinal girders, built up from wooden sections, and was wire braced. The lower girder provided the mounting for the engine and seat for the pilot, and rested on splayed struts, which were the main undercarriage members. These were wire braced and carried twin skids and two pairs of wheels. A nose wheel was mounted at the extreme front and a skid at the rear end.
The wings, in plan, were in the form of a rhomboid or open diamond shape. The structure for these consisted of builtup spars of streamlined section, at top and bottom, and at right angles to the main girders, with interplane struts between. The shape of the wings was maintained by tension cables along the leading edges and curved battens across the chord, but the trailing edges were allowed to remain flexible. Bracing wires from the top and bottom wingtips were taken down to the undercarriage structure. The twin tractor propellers were mounted on shafts on outriggers and were extensively braced by cables to the main structure.
Elevators and a rudder were mounted at the tail, but reliance was placed on wing dihedral for lateral balance.
Power:
50hp Humber four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving by chains twin tractor 8ft diameter propellers.
60hp Green, four-cylinder inline, water-cooled from June 1911.
Data
Span 38ft
Chord 3ft front areas 9ft rear areas
Area 1,200 sq ft
Length 48ft
Height 14 ft 11 in (16ft 10in to top of rudder)
Weight 1,600lb
Dihedral 8 degrees
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EGGLETON gliders (R.H. Eggleton, 24 Cranbury Rd., Eastleigh, Hampshire. Flying at North End, Eastleigh)
Eggleton was an apprentice at the LSWR Carriage Works at Eastleigh, and is reported to have made eleven gliders in the years 1911 to 1914. Of these, three can be identified and illustrated, the first and second being illustrated in Flight 17 February 1912 (p.159).
The first, a parasol monoplane with ailerons and normal tail surfaces, had an enclosed section for the operator, but was of rather flimsy construction, perhaps accounting for its early replacement.
No.2 was a canard monoplane of Valkyrie type with forward elevator, where the pilot sat in a gap in the wing center section. The span was 28ft and the length 24ft.
<...>
Eggleton was an apprentice at the LSWR Carriage Works at Eastleigh, and is reported to have made eleven gliders in the years 1911 to 1914. Of these, three can be identified and illustrated, the first and second being illustrated in Flight 17 February 1912 (p.159).
The first, a parasol monoplane with ailerons and normal tail surfaces, had an enclosed section for the operator, but was of rather flimsy construction, perhaps accounting for its early replacement.
No.2 was a canard monoplane of Valkyrie type with forward elevator, where the pilot sat in a gap in the wing center section. The span was 28ft and the length 24ft.
<...>
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EGGLETON gliders (R.H. Eggleton, 24 Cranbury Rd., Eastleigh, Hampshire. Flying at North End, Eastleigh)
<...>
No.3 was a biplane of unequal span, rather like a Caudron, with a small nacelle on the lower wing. No rudder was fitted and control was achieved with wings and elevators which could be warped. A wheeled undercarriage was fitted. This machine was the subject of a note and illustrations in Flight 18 October 1913 (p. 1144).
Few details of any of the other gliders remain, except that the last had a span of 31ft 6in and was 24ft long. Activities were terminated by the outbreak of war.
<...>
No.3 was a biplane of unequal span, rather like a Caudron, with a small nacelle on the lower wing. No rudder was fitted and control was achieved with wings and elevators which could be warped. A wheeled undercarriage was fitted. This machine was the subject of a note and illustrations in Flight 18 October 1913 (p. 1144).
Few details of any of the other gliders remain, except that the last had a span of 31ft 6in and was 24ft long. Activities were terminated by the outbreak of war.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ELSWORTH monoplane (Oswald Elsworth, Tyneside Foundry Co., Water St., Newcastle)
Elsworth was a member of the Northumberland Aero Club, with flying ground at Bolden Racecourse. His machine was nearing completion in February 1910.
The layout was similar to a Bleriot with open, square section girder fuselage, but with a triangulated undercarriage with twin skids, designed to receive the landing loads and provide drag for braking. The wings had squarecut tips and were warped by a wheel control, fore and aft movement of which operated the elevators. A tailplane and rudder were fitted but no fin. There is no evidence that flight was achieved.
Power: 25hp Advance four-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data
Span 28ft
Weight 150 lb without engine.
Elsworth was a member of the Northumberland Aero Club, with flying ground at Bolden Racecourse. His machine was nearing completion in February 1910.
The layout was similar to a Bleriot with open, square section girder fuselage, but with a triangulated undercarriage with twin skids, designed to receive the landing loads and provide drag for braking. The wings had squarecut tips and were warped by a wheel control, fore and aft movement of which operated the elevators. A tailplane and rudder were fitted but no fin. There is no evidence that flight was achieved.
Power: 25hp Advance four-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data
Span 28ft
Weight 150 lb without engine.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EMPRESS monoplanes Nos.l and 2 (Empress Engineering Co., 180 Stockport Rd., Manchester. Proprietor Charles A. Fletcher)
The first of Fletcher's monoplanes was built in 1909 and tested on 20 October 1909 at Heaton Park, after attempts to start the engine failed, a week earlier. Several runs were made during which the machine lifted off the ground for 20-30 yards, before damage to the wheels and one of the wings occurred. The machine then appears to have been abandoned, although it was shown at the Manchester Aero Club Show at White City in early March 1910.
The second monoplane was reported to be larger and was to be tested on 17 January 1910.
However, before Fletcher could take his seat, the machine was blown twenty feet into the air and finished up severely damaged in a clump of trees. Fletcher claimed to have flown 75-100 yards on previous trials, but this was the last reported appearance of this monoplane
The first aircraft was a parasol monoplane and was a mixed structure of steel tube and bamboo with the pilot seated in a wicker chair. The propeller was made of steel tube laced across with wire and covered with canvas. There are no details of the second monoplane except that the same engine was probably used.
The power was supplied by a five-cylinder Empress engine, which Fletcher also designed. It was rated at 50hp and was an air-cooled rotary, which apparently infringed Gnome patents and later became the subject of a court case.
Data
Span 34ft
Length 30ft
Propeller 6ft
Area 345 sq ft (*320 sq ft)
Weight 365 lb (*330 sq ft)
* alternative figures
The first of Fletcher's monoplanes was built in 1909 and tested on 20 October 1909 at Heaton Park, after attempts to start the engine failed, a week earlier. Several runs were made during which the machine lifted off the ground for 20-30 yards, before damage to the wheels and one of the wings occurred. The machine then appears to have been abandoned, although it was shown at the Manchester Aero Club Show at White City in early March 1910.
The second monoplane was reported to be larger and was to be tested on 17 January 1910.
However, before Fletcher could take his seat, the machine was blown twenty feet into the air and finished up severely damaged in a clump of trees. Fletcher claimed to have flown 75-100 yards on previous trials, but this was the last reported appearance of this monoplane
The first aircraft was a parasol monoplane and was a mixed structure of steel tube and bamboo with the pilot seated in a wicker chair. The propeller was made of steel tube laced across with wire and covered with canvas. There are no details of the second monoplane except that the same engine was probably used.
The power was supplied by a five-cylinder Empress engine, which Fletcher also designed. It was rated at 50hp and was an air-cooled rotary, which apparently infringed Gnome patents and later became the subject of a court case.
Data
Span 34ft
Length 30ft
Propeller 6ft
Area 345 sq ft (*320 sq ft)
Weight 365 lb (*330 sq ft)
* alternative figures
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EMPRESS biplane
Fletcher produced his third machine in 1910 and it first appeared at the Manchester Aero Club Show in March, followed by testing on 8 August 1910 at Manchester Race Course, Castle Irwell. One of the 'pilots' who lifted the machine off for short distances was Jack Alcock of later Atlantic fame, who, as an apprentice at the Empress Works, assisted in the construction of all three of Fletcher's aircraft. Under pressure from the racecourse management after various crashes, Fletcher removed the aircraft to Brooklands, but after losing the case over the Gnome patents, the company went out of business.
The biplane was a pusher on the lines of a Farman and was powered by an Empress seven-cylinder rotary engine. An Edwards four-cylinder two-stroke engine of 30hp was also fitted for a time, and reports indicate that either engine could enable the aircraft to become airborne.
Fletcher produced his third machine in 1910 and it first appeared at the Manchester Aero Club Show in March, followed by testing on 8 August 1910 at Manchester Race Course, Castle Irwell. One of the 'pilots' who lifted the machine off for short distances was Jack Alcock of later Atlantic fame, who, as an apprentice at the Empress Works, assisted in the construction of all three of Fletcher's aircraft. Under pressure from the racecourse management after various crashes, Fletcher removed the aircraft to Brooklands, but after losing the case over the Gnome patents, the company went out of business.
The biplane was a pusher on the lines of a Farman and was powered by an Empress seven-cylinder rotary engine. An Edwards four-cylinder two-stroke engine of 30hp was also fitted for a time, and reports indicate that either engine could enable the aircraft to become airborne.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EVANS monoplane (Evans, Doe Lea, Derbyshire)
This variant of a Bleriot type monoplane was built, over a period of sixteen months in 1910-1911, by Mr. Evans, a miner. The power plant was a 12hp Madison motorcycle engine driving a 6ft diameter propeller. The power was insufficient for the machine to fly.
Data
Span 26ft
Length 24ft
This variant of a Bleriot type monoplane was built, over a period of sixteen months in 1910-1911, by Mr. Evans, a miner. The power plant was a 12hp Madison motorcycle engine driving a 6ft diameter propeller. The power was insufficient for the machine to fly.
Data
Span 26ft
Length 24ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EVERETT-EDGECUMBE monoplane (Everett-Edgecumbe & Co., Colindale, Hendon)
E.I. Everett began the design of his monoplane in 1908, and constructed it in the wooden shed used by Paulhan in his flight from London to Manchester in April 1910, the area around which was later absorbed into Hendon aerodrome. The machine was assembled over a long period and C.R. Fairey was one who assisted in his spare time. It was finally ready for testing on 6-7 December 1910, when Bernard Clutterbuck was able to make short hops, also Everett himself in January 1911.
Although described as Bleriot-like, there were major differences, in particular the marked dihedral and camber and the end plates of the squarecut wings. The axle for the wheels was moved forward during the trials from the sprung trailing portion of the twin skids to a central position between the mounting struts.
The fuselage was originally covered throughout with fabric, but later was uncovered aft of the trailing edge of the wings. The fixed fin was triangular and mounted on top of the rear fuselage and carried a square shaped rudder the lower edge of which was cut at an angle to clear the one piece elevator. Separate fixed tail surfaces were attached to the lower longerons.
Power: 35hp JAP four-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a 6ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 25ft
Area 140 sq ft
Length 16ft
Height 9ft 6in
Max speed 30 mph.
E.I. Everett began the design of his monoplane in 1908, and constructed it in the wooden shed used by Paulhan in his flight from London to Manchester in April 1910, the area around which was later absorbed into Hendon aerodrome. The machine was assembled over a long period and C.R. Fairey was one who assisted in his spare time. It was finally ready for testing on 6-7 December 1910, when Bernard Clutterbuck was able to make short hops, also Everett himself in January 1911.
Although described as Bleriot-like, there were major differences, in particular the marked dihedral and camber and the end plates of the squarecut wings. The axle for the wheels was moved forward during the trials from the sprung trailing portion of the twin skids to a central position between the mounting struts.
The fuselage was originally covered throughout with fabric, but later was uncovered aft of the trailing edge of the wings. The fixed fin was triangular and mounted on top of the rear fuselage and carried a square shaped rudder the lower edge of which was cut at an angle to clear the one piece elevator. Separate fixed tail surfaces were attached to the lower longerons.
Power: 35hp JAP four-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a 6ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 25ft
Area 140 sq ft
Length 16ft
Height 9ft 6in
Max speed 30 mph.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
EVERSHED biplane (Sydney H. Evershed, Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire. Flying Ground at Netherseal)
This machine was constructed during the winter of 1909-1910 and attempts to fly were made at Grangewood Farm, Netherseal on several weekends in May-June 1910 without success. The final attempt was on 11 June 1910 when, under pressure from the farmer who had charged for admission, use was made of a slope to gain speed. The machine rose 6ft in the air, but landed awkwardly, damaging a wheel and causing more general damage. Sydney Evershed had overspent on the project and abandoned all further attempts to fly, but went on to develop electrical equipment, later founding the firm of Evershed and Vignoles.
The machine was a small biplane loosely based on the early Wright glider but driven by a single tractor propeller. The wings were parallel and with slight dihedral and camber. The fuselage consisted of three bamboo longerons tapering to a universal joint at the rear to carry the box kite tail, which was the sole means of control. The pilot was seated on the lower center section behind the engine. The undercarriage consisted of two motorcycle wheels and a single cycle type tail wheel.
Power: 10hp JAP two-cylinder air-cooled vee type.
Data
Span 25ft
Length 23ft
This machine was constructed during the winter of 1909-1910 and attempts to fly were made at Grangewood Farm, Netherseal on several weekends in May-June 1910 without success. The final attempt was on 11 June 1910 when, under pressure from the farmer who had charged for admission, use was made of a slope to gain speed. The machine rose 6ft in the air, but landed awkwardly, damaging a wheel and causing more general damage. Sydney Evershed had overspent on the project and abandoned all further attempts to fly, but went on to develop electrical equipment, later founding the firm of Evershed and Vignoles.
The machine was a small biplane loosely based on the early Wright glider but driven by a single tractor propeller. The wings were parallel and with slight dihedral and camber. The fuselage consisted of three bamboo longerons tapering to a universal joint at the rear to carry the box kite tail, which was the sole means of control. The pilot was seated on the lower center section behind the engine. The undercarriage consisted of two motorcycle wheels and a single cycle type tail wheel.
Power: 10hp JAP two-cylinder air-cooled vee type.
Data
Span 25ft
Length 23ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FARDELL glider (Fardell Bros., Morton Manor, Brading. Isle of Wight)
The Fardell brothers built their glider and tested it on Brading Downs in 1910. It probably went the way of similar projects and was finally dismantled after a season of gliding.
The glider was a neat looking, two bay biplane with the pilot seated on the lower center section. The rudder and elevator were carried on tail booms, which were parallel in both plan and elevation; the rudder was tall and was pivoted inside the booms, in front of the elevator. The machine was raised well clear of the ground on twin curved main skids and a double tail-skid. The wings were double surfaced and without dihedral, and were originally fitted with ailerons mounted on the front outboard interplane struts, later removed and fitted to the lower wings.
The Fardell brothers built their glider and tested it on Brading Downs in 1910. It probably went the way of similar projects and was finally dismantled after a season of gliding.
The glider was a neat looking, two bay biplane with the pilot seated on the lower center section. The rudder and elevator were carried on tail booms, which were parallel in both plan and elevation; the rudder was tall and was pivoted inside the booms, in front of the elevator. The machine was raised well clear of the ground on twin curved main skids and a double tail-skid. The wings were double surfaced and without dihedral, and were originally fitted with ailerons mounted on the front outboard interplane struts, later removed and fitted to the lower wings.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FAVRE monoplane (C. Favre, London)
A monoplane was under construction in a mews garage of the Head Chauffeurs' Club of Great Britain and Ireland in 1910-1911. There is no evidence of its completion.
A monoplane was under construction in a mews garage of the Head Chauffeurs' Club of Great Britain and Ireland in 1910-1911. There is no evidence of its completion.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FAY-WILKINSON biplane (P.P. Fay & Wilkinson, Withernsea, Near, Hull, Yorkshire)
This machine, of which a crude drawing and description appeared in The Aero 27 July 1909 (p. 153), was said to be under construction by Messrs. Fay and Wilkinson after years of experiment.
The biplane main wings were each divided into a center section and outer panels, the latter being controllable by pivoting on their main spars. A similar tail unit was also controllable, but presumably was of smaller span, and may have been of monoplane type.
The engine drove two tractor and two pusher four-bladed propellers through chains and shafts and was mounted on the lower main center section behind the pilot. The 70hp six-cylinder engine was made in Leeds and weighed 300 lb. An undercarriage of four pairs of wheels supported the machine. A stabilizer consisting of a weight suspended below the machine was connected into the control system.
This machine, of which a crude drawing and description appeared in The Aero 27 July 1909 (p. 153), was said to be under construction by Messrs. Fay and Wilkinson after years of experiment.
The biplane main wings were each divided into a center section and outer panels, the latter being controllable by pivoting on their main spars. A similar tail unit was also controllable, but presumably was of smaller span, and may have been of monoplane type.
The engine drove two tractor and two pusher four-bladed propellers through chains and shafts and was mounted on the lower main center section behind the pilot. The 70hp six-cylinder engine was made in Leeds and weighed 300 lb. An undercarriage of four pairs of wheels supported the machine. A stabilizer consisting of a weight suspended below the machine was connected into the control system.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FERGUSON monoplane No.l (J.B. Ferguson & Co., Little Donegall St., Belfast. Later Harry Ferguson Co. Ltd., The May St. Motor Co. Ltd., Belfast)
Harry G. Ferguson was the designer and pilot, whose first aircraft were constructed by his brother's firm of motor engineers. The machine was completed late in 1909 and although a 35hp Green had been acquired it was abandoned after a temporary flywheel disintegrated on test, and the aircraft was fitted instead with a 35hp air-cooled JAP.
The machine had an open rectangular section girder fuselage, incorporating an A-frame which formed the upper pylon and continued down as the main members of the complex chassis with central skid. A large wheel supported the tail. The wings were parallel in chord and were fitted with skids in the form of hoops of cane at the tips, and also further inboard. Warping was employed for lateral control. The tail surfaces consisted of a tailplane on the fuselage centerline carrying a triangular elevator, which operated between top and bottom rudders.
The trials at Hillsborough Old Park using a Beedle propeller, resulted in a few short hops only and, greatly disappointed, Ferguson went off to both Rheims and Blackpool meetings, returning with new ideas for an improved version of his aircraft.
The second version was ready for testing at Hillsborough in December 1909. This was fitted with a new wing with tapered trailing edge. The undercarriage was simplified and no skid was fitted; a second pylon for bracings was added. On 31 December 1909, after a few short hops, the machine covered 130 yards reaching about 15 feet in height, in a 25-30mph wind, the first flight of an Irish-built aircraft. This was achieved using a Cochrane propeller, which Ferguson regarded as unsatisfactory, together with other propellers that he had tried, and he said so, in rather blunt letters to Flight. He praised a propeller from Clarke of Kingston, which he used later, and with which he was more successful, although changes to the machine no doubt contributed. The flying ground was also unsatisfactory and future tests were to be carried out elsewhere.
The third version was taken to Massareene Park, County Antrim in April 1910. It had an increased span wing, without the large hoop skids, an increased height undercarriage and a long tapered fin. The rear fuselage was covered with fabric and a large AA badge (Aviation Association of Ireland) was mounted at the nose. A Clarke propeller was fitted. Although some flights were made, the location proved unsatisfactory, also further modifications to the machine were indicated.
The fourth version was ready for trials in May 1910 and was taken to a the beach at Magilligan Strand, Lough Foyle, County Deny. The aircraft had been considerably modified by the addition of an extra 2ft bay at the nose. The wing had been reduced in span with altered bracings to the raised pylon, now positioned further forward, and without the earlier kingposts. The undercarriage was now fitted with a central skid and the tailwheel was later replaced by a skid. The rudders were triangular and no fin was fitted. Ferguson made a number of flights at Magilligan, increasing steadily to 2 1/2 miles and up to 40ft height by 8 June 1910. On 15 July 1910 the dismantled machine was moved to Newcastle, County Down for a display at Donard Park, but the ground and the weather were unsuitable and he moved to the sands at Dundrum Bay. On 8 August 1910 he was able to cover three miles at a height of 100ft at 35-40mph, for which he won a ?100 prize, donated by the Newcastle Recreation Committee.
Further improvements were made to the machine, the design of which was now basically established. The new nose bay was made triangular in section, and then reverted to rectangular. The fuel tank, previously carried above the fuselage, was placed inside and then transferred to a position between the undercarriage legs. The fuselage was completely covered.
Flying continued at Magilligan Point with passengers being carried, including on 10 October 1910, T.W.K. Clarke, the supplier of Ferguson's favored propeller. Later that day the machine crashed badly and was wrecked beyond repair.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data Version (1) (2) (3) (4)
Span 34ft 34ft 40ft 36ft
Chord 6ft 7ft 7ft 6in -
- tapering to 5ft tapering to 5ft -
Length 30ft - - 32ft
Area 192 sq ft 192 sq ft 292 sq ft 240 sq ft
Weight - 620 lb 660 lb -
Weight allup - 760 lb 800 lb 900lb
Speed - 32mph - 35-40 mph
FERGUSON monoplane No.2
The second Ferguson monoplane embodied the changes made progressively to the first machine, but except for the engine and possibly minor parts salvaged from the wreck of the first, was completely new. It was taken to Newtownards and took off unexpectedly from the beach in windy conditions on 12 June 1910. The propeller and skid were damaged on landing. On 14 June 1910 Ferguson flew with a heavy passenger, who was injured in the landing when further damage occurred. After repairs it was re-flown at Strangford Lough in October and carried several passengers. Ferguson flew the aircraft at Magilligan Strand in 1912, but was concentrating on his motor business and by January 1913 the monoplane was being flown successfully by O.G. Lywood. John Williams, an associate in Ferguson's company, also flew the machine, but abandoned it after various problems. The engine was salvaged, but the aircraft was not rebuilt.
The fuselage of No.2 was of triangular section and the aircraft was generally reminiscent of the Antoinette, having triangular tail surfaces, tapered wings, and the pilot seated high above the top longerons. The undercarriage originally had two wheels and a nose skid but was subsequently modified to include a front wheel between the two convergent landing skids; the hollow axle of the unsprung main wheels allowed the warp cables to pass through, and enabled the deletion of the separate underside mounting for the pulleys. Waiping was controlled by lever by the left hand, the elevator being operated by a separate stick. A single A-frame was used as the anchorage for the top cables. The fuel tank was carried across the fuselage, just behind the engine, with room for a passenger seated below the pylon.
A replica of this aircraft, fitted with the original engine and seat, was built in 1972-1973 for the Irish Aviation Museum by Capt. J.C. Kelly-Rogers, a well-known ex-BOAC and Aer Lingus pilot.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 7ft diameter Clarke propeller.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 7ft tapering to 5ft
Area 180sqft
Area tailplane 26 sq ft
Area elevator 11 sq ft
Area rudders 9 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 9ft 9in
Speed 55 mph
Harry G. Ferguson was the designer and pilot, whose first aircraft were constructed by his brother's firm of motor engineers. The machine was completed late in 1909 and although a 35hp Green had been acquired it was abandoned after a temporary flywheel disintegrated on test, and the aircraft was fitted instead with a 35hp air-cooled JAP.
The machine had an open rectangular section girder fuselage, incorporating an A-frame which formed the upper pylon and continued down as the main members of the complex chassis with central skid. A large wheel supported the tail. The wings were parallel in chord and were fitted with skids in the form of hoops of cane at the tips, and also further inboard. Warping was employed for lateral control. The tail surfaces consisted of a tailplane on the fuselage centerline carrying a triangular elevator, which operated between top and bottom rudders.
The trials at Hillsborough Old Park using a Beedle propeller, resulted in a few short hops only and, greatly disappointed, Ferguson went off to both Rheims and Blackpool meetings, returning with new ideas for an improved version of his aircraft.
The second version was ready for testing at Hillsborough in December 1909. This was fitted with a new wing with tapered trailing edge. The undercarriage was simplified and no skid was fitted; a second pylon for bracings was added. On 31 December 1909, after a few short hops, the machine covered 130 yards reaching about 15 feet in height, in a 25-30mph wind, the first flight of an Irish-built aircraft. This was achieved using a Cochrane propeller, which Ferguson regarded as unsatisfactory, together with other propellers that he had tried, and he said so, in rather blunt letters to Flight. He praised a propeller from Clarke of Kingston, which he used later, and with which he was more successful, although changes to the machine no doubt contributed. The flying ground was also unsatisfactory and future tests were to be carried out elsewhere.
The third version was taken to Massareene Park, County Antrim in April 1910. It had an increased span wing, without the large hoop skids, an increased height undercarriage and a long tapered fin. The rear fuselage was covered with fabric and a large AA badge (Aviation Association of Ireland) was mounted at the nose. A Clarke propeller was fitted. Although some flights were made, the location proved unsatisfactory, also further modifications to the machine were indicated.
The fourth version was ready for trials in May 1910 and was taken to a the beach at Magilligan Strand, Lough Foyle, County Deny. The aircraft had been considerably modified by the addition of an extra 2ft bay at the nose. The wing had been reduced in span with altered bracings to the raised pylon, now positioned further forward, and without the earlier kingposts. The undercarriage was now fitted with a central skid and the tailwheel was later replaced by a skid. The rudders were triangular and no fin was fitted. Ferguson made a number of flights at Magilligan, increasing steadily to 2 1/2 miles and up to 40ft height by 8 June 1910. On 15 July 1910 the dismantled machine was moved to Newcastle, County Down for a display at Donard Park, but the ground and the weather were unsuitable and he moved to the sands at Dundrum Bay. On 8 August 1910 he was able to cover three miles at a height of 100ft at 35-40mph, for which he won a ?100 prize, donated by the Newcastle Recreation Committee.
Further improvements were made to the machine, the design of which was now basically established. The new nose bay was made triangular in section, and then reverted to rectangular. The fuel tank, previously carried above the fuselage, was placed inside and then transferred to a position between the undercarriage legs. The fuselage was completely covered.
Flying continued at Magilligan Point with passengers being carried, including on 10 October 1910, T.W.K. Clarke, the supplier of Ferguson's favored propeller. Later that day the machine crashed badly and was wrecked beyond repair.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data Version (1) (2) (3) (4)
Span 34ft 34ft 40ft 36ft
Chord 6ft 7ft 7ft 6in -
- tapering to 5ft tapering to 5ft -
Length 30ft - - 32ft
Area 192 sq ft 192 sq ft 292 sq ft 240 sq ft
Weight - 620 lb 660 lb -
Weight allup - 760 lb 800 lb 900lb
Speed - 32mph - 35-40 mph
FERGUSON monoplane No.2
The second Ferguson monoplane embodied the changes made progressively to the first machine, but except for the engine and possibly minor parts salvaged from the wreck of the first, was completely new. It was taken to Newtownards and took off unexpectedly from the beach in windy conditions on 12 June 1910. The propeller and skid were damaged on landing. On 14 June 1910 Ferguson flew with a heavy passenger, who was injured in the landing when further damage occurred. After repairs it was re-flown at Strangford Lough in October and carried several passengers. Ferguson flew the aircraft at Magilligan Strand in 1912, but was concentrating on his motor business and by January 1913 the monoplane was being flown successfully by O.G. Lywood. John Williams, an associate in Ferguson's company, also flew the machine, but abandoned it after various problems. The engine was salvaged, but the aircraft was not rebuilt.
The fuselage of No.2 was of triangular section and the aircraft was generally reminiscent of the Antoinette, having triangular tail surfaces, tapered wings, and the pilot seated high above the top longerons. The undercarriage originally had two wheels and a nose skid but was subsequently modified to include a front wheel between the two convergent landing skids; the hollow axle of the unsprung main wheels allowed the warp cables to pass through, and enabled the deletion of the separate underside mounting for the pulleys. Waiping was controlled by lever by the left hand, the elevator being operated by a separate stick. A single A-frame was used as the anchorage for the top cables. The fuel tank was carried across the fuselage, just behind the engine, with room for a passenger seated below the pylon.
A replica of this aircraft, fitted with the original engine and seat, was built in 1972-1973 for the Irish Aviation Museum by Capt. J.C. Kelly-Rogers, a well-known ex-BOAC and Aer Lingus pilot.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 7ft diameter Clarke propeller.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 7ft tapering to 5ft
Area 180sqft
Area tailplane 26 sq ft
Area elevator 11 sq ft
Area rudders 9 sq ft
Length 27ft
Height 9ft 9in
Speed 55 mph
Ferguson monoplane No.l was built in Belfast by Harry Ferguson in four versions. This is the first version as tested in December 1909 with Beedle propeller.
Ferguson monoplane No.l. The fourth version at Magilligan Strand which was wrecked when flying from there in October 1910. The fuselage nose was modified and a skid was fitted.
Ferguson monoplane No.2 was a success and was flying from June 1910 to early 1913. A nosewheel was fitted.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FILL monoplane (Vincent Fill, c/o Eastbourne Aviation Co.)
This was one of the 'unofficial' Bleriot monoplanes built entirely by a pupil pilot, trained at the EAC and flown from August 1913.
Power: 30hp Anzani three-cylinder Y type air-cooled radial.
This was one of the 'unofficial' Bleriot monoplanes built entirely by a pupil pilot, trained at the EAC and flown from August 1913.
Power: 30hp Anzani three-cylinder Y type air-cooled radial.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FLANDERS aircraft (L. Howard Flanders Ltd., Brooklands Shed 33 and Townsend Rd., Richmond, Surrey)
Howard Flanders began working as an assistant to A. V. Roe at Lea Marshes in 1909. In 1910, with financial support from Dukinfield-Jones and others, he established himself in business, initially at Brooklands. He also acquired premises at Richmond in March 1912. Flanders was a Cambridge graduate and an intelligent designer, who expressed serious views on various aviation matters of importance.
The firm began with a series of monoplanes which, unfortunately, were delivered for military service at the period of the ban on monoplanes and so were never used. The only biplane from the company, for the Military Trials of August 1912, was let down by the lateness of the unsatisfactory ABC engine. Flanders, who had a physical disability, was involved in a bad motorcycle accident in the autumn of 1913 and his company passed into bankruptcy. He went to Australia in January 1914 for six months to recuperate, and returned in July 1914 to be engaged as chief designer for Vickers at Crayford.
FLANDERS F.1 monoplane
This was to be a twin pusher monoplane with a 120hp ABC engine and variable incidence wing to aid stability. The engine did not materialize and construction was abandoned in May 1911.
Howard Flanders began working as an assistant to A. V. Roe at Lea Marshes in 1909. In 1910, with financial support from Dukinfield-Jones and others, he established himself in business, initially at Brooklands. He also acquired premises at Richmond in March 1912. Flanders was a Cambridge graduate and an intelligent designer, who expressed serious views on various aviation matters of importance.
The firm began with a series of monoplanes which, unfortunately, were delivered for military service at the period of the ban on monoplanes and so were never used. The only biplane from the company, for the Military Trials of August 1912, was let down by the lateness of the unsatisfactory ABC engine. Flanders, who had a physical disability, was involved in a bad motorcycle accident in the autumn of 1913 and his company passed into bankruptcy. He went to Australia in January 1914 for six months to recuperate, and returned in July 1914 to be engaged as chief designer for Vickers at Crayford.
FLANDERS F.1 monoplane
This was to be a twin pusher monoplane with a 120hp ABC engine and variable incidence wing to aid stability. The engine did not materialize and construction was abandoned in May 1911.
Flanders Fl twin-pusher monoplane was partly built between October 1910 and May 1911 but was abandoned through lack of the selected engine.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FLANDERS F.2 monoplane
Flanders' first aeroplane to be completed was a single-seater tractor monoplane of conventional layout. The fuselage was based on a central structure incorporating two heavy ash members in the forward fuselage, which supported the engine and pilot and included front and rear spar sections, to which the wings were attached. Also included were the main kingpost and a beam, to which the upright members of the undercarriage were attached. The external shape of the fuselage was in the form of a conventional box girder, with plywood covering at the front and fabric at the rear end. The center structure was tapered and extended aft to integrate with the box girder.
The wings were tapered and braced by steel tapes from the front spar to the undercarriage structure, and to a post above the fuselage. The rear spar bracing cables also operated the warping control. The undercarriage had a central skid, the radius members being sprung and attached to the horizontal beam in the primary structure. Horizontal springs were fitted to realign the wheels, which could deflect under side loads. The tail unit had no fin.
The Green engine was fitted with a flywheel behind the propeller. Cooling was catered for by two radiators, positioned on either side of the front fuselage partly below the wings. The machine was flown initially by E.V.B. Fisher on 31 July 1911.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a 8ft diameter Regy propeller.
Data
Span 34ft 6in
Chord 7ft tapering to 5ft 6in
Area 200 sq ft
Length 29ft 6in
Dihedral 4 degrees
FLANDERS F.3 monoplane
This was the F.2 converted to a two-seater with increased length and wing area. The second cockpit was positioned in front of the pilot. The warping control cables were transferred to a post below the fuselage, separate from the undercarriage structure, and the pulley was enclosed in a streamlined casing. The side mounted radiators were taller and shorter, and positioned further back in the gaps between the wing and the fuselage. An additional small radiator, with header tank, was fitted behind the engine, which also carried an exhaust silencer. A small fin was also added.
The F.3 was first reported flying with a passenger on 22 November 1911 and continued in use until 15 May 1912, when it crashed killing the pilot, E.V.B. Fisher, and his passenger.
During its relatively short career the F.3 was used by Marconi at Brooklands for his ground to air wireless experiments.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 41ft (also 42ft reported)
Chord 7ft 8in tapering to 5ft 8in
Area 240 sq ft
Area tailplane 22 sq ft
Length 31ft 9in
Area elevators 13 sq ft
Area rudder 6.5 sq ft
Height 8ft 9in (tail down)
Flanders' first aeroplane to be completed was a single-seater tractor monoplane of conventional layout. The fuselage was based on a central structure incorporating two heavy ash members in the forward fuselage, which supported the engine and pilot and included front and rear spar sections, to which the wings were attached. Also included were the main kingpost and a beam, to which the upright members of the undercarriage were attached. The external shape of the fuselage was in the form of a conventional box girder, with plywood covering at the front and fabric at the rear end. The center structure was tapered and extended aft to integrate with the box girder.
The wings were tapered and braced by steel tapes from the front spar to the undercarriage structure, and to a post above the fuselage. The rear spar bracing cables also operated the warping control. The undercarriage had a central skid, the radius members being sprung and attached to the horizontal beam in the primary structure. Horizontal springs were fitted to realign the wheels, which could deflect under side loads. The tail unit had no fin.
The Green engine was fitted with a flywheel behind the propeller. Cooling was catered for by two radiators, positioned on either side of the front fuselage partly below the wings. The machine was flown initially by E.V.B. Fisher on 31 July 1911.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a 8ft diameter Regy propeller.
Data
Span 34ft 6in
Chord 7ft tapering to 5ft 6in
Area 200 sq ft
Length 29ft 6in
Dihedral 4 degrees
FLANDERS F.3 monoplane
This was the F.2 converted to a two-seater with increased length and wing area. The second cockpit was positioned in front of the pilot. The warping control cables were transferred to a post below the fuselage, separate from the undercarriage structure, and the pulley was enclosed in a streamlined casing. The side mounted radiators were taller and shorter, and positioned further back in the gaps between the wing and the fuselage. An additional small radiator, with header tank, was fitted behind the engine, which also carried an exhaust silencer. A small fin was also added.
The F.3 was first reported flying with a passenger on 22 November 1911 and continued in use until 15 May 1912, when it crashed killing the pilot, E.V.B. Fisher, and his passenger.
During its relatively short career the F.3 was used by Marconi at Brooklands for his ground to air wireless experiments.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 41ft (also 42ft reported)
Chord 7ft 8in tapering to 5ft 8in
Area 240 sq ft
Area tailplane 22 sq ft
Length 31ft 9in
Area elevators 13 sq ft
Area rudder 6.5 sq ft
Height 8ft 9in (tail down)
Flanders F3 was the two-seater version of F2 which crashed with fatal results at Brooklands in May 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FLANDERS B.2 biplane
The ABC engine intended for the biplane built for the Military Trials of August 1912, was not ready in time to be fitted, so the machine was towed, without its power unit to Larkhill. The undercarriage of the machine, No. 14 in the trials, was damaged on the way. After repairs, the aircraft took part in the assembly test and subsequently the engine was fitted. After a brief test, mechanical trouble developed, described as a 'tied-up camshaft' caused by a stripped timing gear, and the aircraft was withdrawn.
The bottom of the fuselage was basically of triangular section with a full-length keel, changing to rectangular in the forward area, to a position behind the rear cockpit, where the bottom longerons joined to the central keel. A rounded decking ran the full length of the top.
The wings were of two bays with top wing overhang, braced by cables to kingposts above the outer interplane struts. The front inboard struts were of strong ash to carry the loads from the undercarriage, which was mounted immediately below. The axle was sprung and moved in slots in the vertical members, being restrained by a tubular member with a pivot on a vee strut below the engine, which also served to mount a long curved central skid.
Lateral control by warping of both top and bottom wings was operated by cables and pulleys. A conventional tail unit included an aerodynamically balanced rudder of comma shape.
Subsequently a 40hp ABC was installed and the machine flew with this for the first time on 22 December 1912, piloted by Raynham, and later also with two passengers in its capacious fuselage. On 29 December 1912 the aircraft was damaged and the wings were then replaced with ones of slightly less span and altered tip shape. A split rudder to serve as an air brake was tried in the spring of 1913, but was soon discarded. In October 1913 a 60hp Isaacson radial replaced the ABC and an improved performance resulted.
A further engine change was made in June 1914, after it was reported that Lt. R.E.B. Hunt RN had bought the machine, with the fitting of a 70hp Gnome in a circular cowling, with cutaway lower portion. A fin and new rudder were also fitted. The Flanders biplane was taken over by the Admiralty at the outbreak of war, becoming serial No.918 in the RNAS until deleted in January 1915.
Power:
(1) 100hp ABC eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving a 8ft 6in dia Regy propeller.
(2) 40hp ABC four-cylinder inline, water-cooled.
(3) 60hp Isaacson seven-cylinder, air-cooled radial driving a 8ft 6in dia Lang propeller
(4) 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder, air-cooled rotary.
Data Version (1) (2) (3) (4)
Span top 43ft 43ft 41ft 40ft
Span bottom 27ft 27ft 27ft 27ft
Chord top 6ft 7in 6ft 7in 6ft 7in 6ft 7in
Chord bottom 5ft 1in 5ft 1in 5ft 1in 5ft 1in
Area wings 400 sq ft 400 sq ft 400 sq ft 400 sq ft
Area tailplane 28 sq ft 28 sq ft 28 sq ft
Area elevators 14 sq ft 14 sq ft 14 sq ft
Length 31ft 6in* 31ft 6in 31ft 10in 31ft
Weight 1,250 lb 670 lb 1,000 lb 1,050 lb
Weight allup 2,000 lb 1,100lb 1,571lb 1,650 lb
Speed (mph) 65 (est.) 38-56 40-65 40-68
* The Aero reported 30ft 6in
The ABC engine intended for the biplane built for the Military Trials of August 1912, was not ready in time to be fitted, so the machine was towed, without its power unit to Larkhill. The undercarriage of the machine, No. 14 in the trials, was damaged on the way. After repairs, the aircraft took part in the assembly test and subsequently the engine was fitted. After a brief test, mechanical trouble developed, described as a 'tied-up camshaft' caused by a stripped timing gear, and the aircraft was withdrawn.
The bottom of the fuselage was basically of triangular section with a full-length keel, changing to rectangular in the forward area, to a position behind the rear cockpit, where the bottom longerons joined to the central keel. A rounded decking ran the full length of the top.
The wings were of two bays with top wing overhang, braced by cables to kingposts above the outer interplane struts. The front inboard struts were of strong ash to carry the loads from the undercarriage, which was mounted immediately below. The axle was sprung and moved in slots in the vertical members, being restrained by a tubular member with a pivot on a vee strut below the engine, which also served to mount a long curved central skid.
Lateral control by warping of both top and bottom wings was operated by cables and pulleys. A conventional tail unit included an aerodynamically balanced rudder of comma shape.
Subsequently a 40hp ABC was installed and the machine flew with this for the first time on 22 December 1912, piloted by Raynham, and later also with two passengers in its capacious fuselage. On 29 December 1912 the aircraft was damaged and the wings were then replaced with ones of slightly less span and altered tip shape. A split rudder to serve as an air brake was tried in the spring of 1913, but was soon discarded. In October 1913 a 60hp Isaacson radial replaced the ABC and an improved performance resulted.
A further engine change was made in June 1914, after it was reported that Lt. R.E.B. Hunt RN had bought the machine, with the fitting of a 70hp Gnome in a circular cowling, with cutaway lower portion. A fin and new rudder were also fitted. The Flanders biplane was taken over by the Admiralty at the outbreak of war, becoming serial No.918 in the RNAS until deleted in January 1915.
Power:
(1) 100hp ABC eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving a 8ft 6in dia Regy propeller.
(2) 40hp ABC four-cylinder inline, water-cooled.
(3) 60hp Isaacson seven-cylinder, air-cooled radial driving a 8ft 6in dia Lang propeller
(4) 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder, air-cooled rotary.
Data Version (1) (2) (3) (4)
Span top 43ft 43ft 41ft 40ft
Span bottom 27ft 27ft 27ft 27ft
Chord top 6ft 7in 6ft 7in 6ft 7in 6ft 7in
Chord bottom 5ft 1in 5ft 1in 5ft 1in 5ft 1in
Area wings 400 sq ft 400 sq ft 400 sq ft 400 sq ft
Area tailplane 28 sq ft 28 sq ft 28 sq ft
Area elevators 14 sq ft 14 sq ft 14 sq ft
Length 31ft 6in* 31ft 6in 31ft 10in 31ft
Weight 1,250 lb 670 lb 1,000 lb 1,050 lb
Weight allup 2,000 lb 1,100lb 1,571lb 1,650 lb
Speed (mph) 65 (est.) 38-56 40-65 40-68
* The Aero reported 30ft 6in
Flanders B2. The firm's only biplane was constructed in 1912 for the Military Trials but was under-powered with its 40hp ABC, fitted when the 100hp ABC failed on test.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FLANDERS F.4 monoplane
The War Office ordered four F.4 monoplanes in late 1911, and these were built in the new works at Townsend Rd., Richmond, before being taken to Brooklands for final assembly and flight trials. The first machine was flying there by 7 July 1912 in the hands of F.R Raynham, the others being transferred there progressively until 1 January 1913, when the last machine made its first flight.
The earlier type of fuselage structure was discontinued and a conventional type of box girder now constituted the primary structure, and a decking was provided around the two cockpits. The undercarriage of the first machine failed to satisfy the rough field requirement, when tested at Farnborough in September, and the machine was returned for modification.
A strengthened undercarriage structure, with separate legs and half axles, was attached direct to the bottom longerons, and was sprung by four rubber cords on each leg. Larger wheels, which did not castor, replaced the original design on all four aircraft. The engine was now air-cooled, thus dispensing with radiators, and a four-bladed propeller was used.
The general configuration was otherwise similar to the earlier F.3 aircraft except for a pair of parallel chord wings fitted to the fourth machine. Steel tapes, chains and sprockets were used to operate the warp control.
Power: 70hp Renault eight-cylinder, air-cooled vee with integral fan and ducting. 2:1 reduction gear driving four blades consisting of two separate 8ft 6in Regy propellers.
Data
Span 40ft 6in
Chord 8ft 6in tapering to 5ft 9in
Area 240 sq ft
Area tailplane 25 sq ft
Area elevators 18 sq ft
Area rudder 10 sq ft
Length 31ft 6in
Height 9ft tail up
Weight 1,350lb
Weight allup 1,850lb
Speed range 41-67mph
Four aircraft built, serial Nos.265, 281, 422 and 439
The War Office ordered four F.4 monoplanes in late 1911, and these were built in the new works at Townsend Rd., Richmond, before being taken to Brooklands for final assembly and flight trials. The first machine was flying there by 7 July 1912 in the hands of F.R Raynham, the others being transferred there progressively until 1 January 1913, when the last machine made its first flight.
The earlier type of fuselage structure was discontinued and a conventional type of box girder now constituted the primary structure, and a decking was provided around the two cockpits. The undercarriage of the first machine failed to satisfy the rough field requirement, when tested at Farnborough in September, and the machine was returned for modification.
A strengthened undercarriage structure, with separate legs and half axles, was attached direct to the bottom longerons, and was sprung by four rubber cords on each leg. Larger wheels, which did not castor, replaced the original design on all four aircraft. The engine was now air-cooled, thus dispensing with radiators, and a four-bladed propeller was used.
The general configuration was otherwise similar to the earlier F.3 aircraft except for a pair of parallel chord wings fitted to the fourth machine. Steel tapes, chains and sprockets were used to operate the warp control.
Power: 70hp Renault eight-cylinder, air-cooled vee with integral fan and ducting. 2:1 reduction gear driving four blades consisting of two separate 8ft 6in Regy propellers.
Data
Span 40ft 6in
Chord 8ft 6in tapering to 5ft 9in
Area 240 sq ft
Area tailplane 25 sq ft
Area elevators 18 sq ft
Area rudder 10 sq ft
Length 31ft 6in
Height 9ft tail up
Weight 1,350lb
Weight allup 1,850lb
Speed range 41-67mph
Four aircraft built, serial Nos.265, 281, 422 and 439
Flanders F4. Four of these monoplanes were built at the new Richmond works in 1912 for the War Office but were discarded after the official ban on monoplanes for the RFC.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FORBES & ARNOLD monoplane (Victor F.E. Forbes and Arthur J. Arnold, Leighon Sea, Essex)
This machine was the subject of Patent No.20846/1909, although it was considerably later when details and illustrations appeared in Flight.
The upper part was a boxkite unit of diamond shape, with additional surfaces in the form of long flexible sails on either side. The lower part was a four wheeled chassis, with the operator seated on a wicker chair. Pitch and yaw control was to be obtained from the surfaces with marked anhedral, mounted at front and rear, stability being achieved by the pendulum effect. A low powered motor, mounted on the chassis, drove a tractor propeller by belt. The first engine was water-cooled, probably a car engine, requiring a radiator, and gave insufficient power. This was replaced and a corrugated blade propeller fitted, probably a Cochrane, with which a brief flight is believed to have been made at Rochford.
The structure, made of tube or bamboo, appears to be flimsy and the whole concept seems impractical. Nothing further was heard of this machine.
Data
Span 16ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 24ft
Height 10ft
Weight allup 4501b
This machine was the subject of Patent No.20846/1909, although it was considerably later when details and illustrations appeared in Flight.
The upper part was a boxkite unit of diamond shape, with additional surfaces in the form of long flexible sails on either side. The lower part was a four wheeled chassis, with the operator seated on a wicker chair. Pitch and yaw control was to be obtained from the surfaces with marked anhedral, mounted at front and rear, stability being achieved by the pendulum effect. A low powered motor, mounted on the chassis, drove a tractor propeller by belt. The first engine was water-cooled, probably a car engine, requiring a radiator, and gave insufficient power. This was replaced and a corrugated blade propeller fitted, probably a Cochrane, with which a brief flight is believed to have been made at Rochford.
The structure, made of tube or bamboo, appears to be flimsy and the whole concept seems impractical. Nothing further was heard of this machine.
Data
Span 16ft
Area 350 sq ft
Length 24ft
Height 10ft
Weight allup 4501b
Forbes and Arnold monoplane of patented design was built in Essex in 1910-1911 and may have lifted off briefly.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FRANCIS 'Comet' cycle aeroplane (B.S. and R Francis, 97 Huddleston Rd., Tufnell Park, London)
This was a bicycle with two sets of planes, which was exhibited at Olympia in March 1910. Each set comprised six planes placed in vee-form, one set in front of, and one behind the rider. The total surface area was 120 sq ft and the incidence of the planes could be controlled. There was a pusher propeller powered by the rider.
This was a bicycle with two sets of planes, which was exhibited at Olympia in March 1910. Each set comprised six planes placed in vee-form, one set in front of, and one behind the rider. The total surface area was 120 sq ft and the incidence of the planes could be controlled. There was a pusher propeller powered by the rider.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FRANKLIN biplane (H.H. Franklin, A.E. Lowy, H.W. Holt and CM. Spielman)
This crude machine was built in the 1909 Easter vacation, by four Cambridge undergraduates, at the home of Franklin, in the Chilterns.
The machine was a tandem biplane of large proportions, with front biplane elevator and tail mounted rudder. The pilot sat behind the front wings and behind him was a 12hp Buchet twin-cylinder, air-cooled motor driving through chain, the twin pusher propellers behind the rear wings. For lateral control there were four hinged flaps on each wing, pivoted diagonally to face forward, an unconventional scheme of doubtful merit. Air in compression was used in the undercarriage legs.
Limited time allowed only brief trials which resulted in some damage on the ground and the machine was abandoned.
This crude machine was built in the 1909 Easter vacation, by four Cambridge undergraduates, at the home of Franklin, in the Chilterns.
The machine was a tandem biplane of large proportions, with front biplane elevator and tail mounted rudder. The pilot sat behind the front wings and behind him was a 12hp Buchet twin-cylinder, air-cooled motor driving through chain, the twin pusher propellers behind the rear wings. For lateral control there were four hinged flaps on each wing, pivoted diagonally to face forward, an unconventional scheme of doubtful merit. Air in compression was used in the undercarriage legs.
Limited time allowed only brief trials which resulted in some damage on the ground and the machine was abandoned.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FRITZ monoplane (Fritz Goetze, designer, H. and D.J. Oyler, 35 New Cavendish St., London Wl, constructors)
This machine resembled a Bleriot XII or Demoiselle in certain features, particularly the positioning of the pilot and engine and the type of undercarriage.
The fuselage consisted of three bamboo longerons, the upper being 2 l/2in diameter and curved, and triangular steel tube frames all suitably braced. The wings were also curved to a gull wing shape and were based on two 2in diameter, and one 1 in diameter, bamboo spars with bamboo ribs. Lateral control was by pedal for warping the wings. An aluminum member formed the leading edge, and a steel wire the trailing edge. Full-chord elevators, outboard of the tailplane tips, were controlled by a hand-wheel. The rudder was also controlled by a hand-wheel and was the only vertical surface. A streamlined fuel tank was mounted in the cabane above the wing with coolant radiators just below.
The Fritz monoplane was illustrated and described briefly in Flight in August 1911 but was not referred to again, although it was in a completed state at an unidentified airfield.
Power: 40hp ENV type D eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 7ft
Area 210sqft
Area tailplane 15 sq ft
Area elevators 15 sq ft
Area rudder 9 sq ft
Length 29ft
This machine resembled a Bleriot XII or Demoiselle in certain features, particularly the positioning of the pilot and engine and the type of undercarriage.
The fuselage consisted of three bamboo longerons, the upper being 2 l/2in diameter and curved, and triangular steel tube frames all suitably braced. The wings were also curved to a gull wing shape and were based on two 2in diameter, and one 1 in diameter, bamboo spars with bamboo ribs. Lateral control was by pedal for warping the wings. An aluminum member formed the leading edge, and a steel wire the trailing edge. Full-chord elevators, outboard of the tailplane tips, were controlled by a hand-wheel. The rudder was also controlled by a hand-wheel and was the only vertical surface. A streamlined fuel tank was mounted in the cabane above the wing with coolant radiators just below.
The Fritz monoplane was illustrated and described briefly in Flight in August 1911 but was not referred to again, although it was in a completed state at an unidentified airfield.
Power: 40hp ENV type D eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 7ft
Area 210sqft
Area tailplane 15 sq ft
Area elevators 15 sq ft
Area rudder 9 sq ft
Length 29ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FROST ornithopters (Edward Purkis Frost, West Wratting Hall, Cambridgeshire)
Frost experimented with flapping wing devices, using actual goose feathers for the wing surfaces. Early trials in 1877, in association with Dr. F.W.H. Hutchison, of a large machine powered by a 5hp steam engine, with a total weight of 650 lb, were a failure when attempts were made to lift a man. This device had four sets of wings, with a maximum span of 30ft. Later tests of a small model, with 3 sq.ft of wing area, were carried out on a whirling arm, powered by a 2hp electric motor to produce the flapping motion, and this induced rotation of the arm.
A full scale machine, smaller than the 1877 machine, followed in 1905, powered by a petrol engine from a 3hp BAT motor cycle. With a span of 20ft and weighing 232 lb, it was constructed on a tubular frame on four wheels, with a platform on which the operator stood. It was said to have risen up to two feet in the air and tended to move forward. This machine had only one pair of wings. This work was reported to the Cambridge University Engineering Society and recorded in The Automotor Journal.
E.P. Frost was president of the Aeronautical Society from 1908 to 1911, until the more progressive members forced a reorganization of the Society and he retired. The 1905 machine exists at the Shuttleworth Collection and the model is preserved in the Science Museum.
Frost experimented with flapping wing devices, using actual goose feathers for the wing surfaces. Early trials in 1877, in association with Dr. F.W.H. Hutchison, of a large machine powered by a 5hp steam engine, with a total weight of 650 lb, were a failure when attempts were made to lift a man. This device had four sets of wings, with a maximum span of 30ft. Later tests of a small model, with 3 sq.ft of wing area, were carried out on a whirling arm, powered by a 2hp electric motor to produce the flapping motion, and this induced rotation of the arm.
A full scale machine, smaller than the 1877 machine, followed in 1905, powered by a petrol engine from a 3hp BAT motor cycle. With a span of 20ft and weighing 232 lb, it was constructed on a tubular frame on four wheels, with a platform on which the operator stood. It was said to have risen up to two feet in the air and tended to move forward. This machine had only one pair of wings. This work was reported to the Cambridge University Engineering Society and recorded in The Automotor Journal.
E.P. Frost was president of the Aeronautical Society from 1908 to 1911, until the more progressive members forced a reorganization of the Society and he retired. The 1905 machine exists at the Shuttleworth Collection and the model is preserved in the Science Museum.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FULFORD monoplane No.l (W.H. Fulford, Mills-Fulford Ltd., Coventry)
This very small Demoiselle type monoplane was exhibited at the Stanley Cycle Show in the Agricultural Hall, Islington in November 1909. It was in the nature of a demonstration rig, with very short wingspan, for space considerations at the show. It was also referred to as the Mills-Fulford.
The machine was powered by a four-cylinder FN air-cooled motor cycle engine driving a 6ft diameter tractor propeller by chain, and had a front elevator with differential action, as well as a combined tail elevator and rudder. The structure was of steel bicycle tubing and was mounted on three wheels with curved strip springs.
This very small Demoiselle type monoplane was exhibited at the Stanley Cycle Show in the Agricultural Hall, Islington in November 1909. It was in the nature of a demonstration rig, with very short wingspan, for space considerations at the show. It was also referred to as the Mills-Fulford.
The machine was powered by a four-cylinder FN air-cooled motor cycle engine driving a 6ft diameter tractor propeller by chain, and had a front elevator with differential action, as well as a combined tail elevator and rudder. The structure was of steel bicycle tubing and was mounted on three wheels with curved strip springs.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GASKELL-BLACKBURN biplane (Vivian Gaskell-Blackburn, Brooklands)
Gaskell-Blackburn learnt to fly at the Bristol School at Brooklands, receiving certificate No.617 dated 10 September 1913. He then constructed a biplane, that first appeared for engine run on 27 February 1914. First flight was on 2 April 1914 at Brooklands, where it was used until the outbreak of war.
The biplane was a conventional single-seat, two bay, tractor somewhat resembling the Wong Tong Mei. The Aeroplane reported at the time that a few parts from that machine, albeit adequately strengthened, were actually incorporated in the Gaskell-Blackburn. A much later record stated that parts of three aeroplanes, namely a Champel, the Parsons biplane and a Sommer of the Pashley brothers were used in its construction.
Power: 40hp ABC four-cylinder inline, water-cooled.
Gaskell-Blackburn learnt to fly at the Bristol School at Brooklands, receiving certificate No.617 dated 10 September 1913. He then constructed a biplane, that first appeared for engine run on 27 February 1914. First flight was on 2 April 1914 at Brooklands, where it was used until the outbreak of war.
The biplane was a conventional single-seat, two bay, tractor somewhat resembling the Wong Tong Mei. The Aeroplane reported at the time that a few parts from that machine, albeit adequately strengthened, were actually incorporated in the Gaskell-Blackburn. A much later record stated that parts of three aeroplanes, namely a Champel, the Parsons biplane and a Sommer of the Pashley brothers were used in its construction.
Power: 40hp ABC four-cylinder inline, water-cooled.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GAUNT Cycloplane (John Gaunt, Gargrave, near Leeds, Yorkshire)
John Gaunt first appeared on the aeronautical scene at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1909, with an attachment to a bicycle to provide lift to aid the cyclist. It could also be fitted to a boat.
John Gaunt first appeared on the aeronautical scene at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1909, with an attachment to a bicycle to provide lift to aid the cyclist. It could also be fitted to a boat.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GAUNT biplane No.l (Apperley Bridge, near Bradford, Yorkshire and Southport Aerodrome Hesketh Rd., Southport, Lancashire)
Gaunt soon discarded the Cycloplane and proceeded to design and construct a twin pusher biplane. The machine was tested in April 1910 at Apperley Bridge, near Bradford, but on 27 April 1910 a petrol explosion occurred, which damaged the machine and badly burned John Gaunt.
The machine was rebuilt and was out again in August, but Gaunt had now moved across to Southport, and rented a hangar adjacent to the sands. After engine problems, the machine appeared to be ready to lift off, until damage occurred through the undercarriage sinking into the soft sand on 30 August 1910. It was probably at this stage that Gaunt decided to save the weight of the heavy chain drives and other fittings by converting the machine to a single propeller tractor.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled.
Data
Wing area 200 sq ft
GAUNT 'See-Saw' aeroplane
The following letter, with sketch, appeared in Flight 11 March 1911 (p.213) and described an unlikely looking biplane, which presumably remained unbuilt.
'I enclose a sketch of the see-saw type of aeroplane that I have invented and for which I claim that it is easier to learn to fly than any other type. The pilot has the whole of the machine in front of him with direct control and "feel" of both elevating and steering handle, which is of gunmetal and similar to the cycle handlebar in use for steering, but with up and down movement for balancing.
Primarily, the invention is to secure a better sense of direction in beam winds. The present loading of aeroplanes is a central disposition of earned weights, which in a beam wind acts as a pivot for the aeroplane to veer round.
Features not to be lost sight of are: the compass is a long way from the engine, so is the pilot, and the provision of a hoeshoe or grapnel will be useful to hold back aeroplane whilst starting engine and as an emergency drag in finishing a flight.
The idea is the outcome of another original machine I have designed, built and flown with an Alvaston Engine. John Gaunt.'
GAUNT monoplane
Flight reported on 1 April 1911 (p.296), trials at Southport of a Gaunt monoplane, by the Hon. WS. Leveson-Gower RN, of which he was part owner. On a third run on 24 March 1911, the machine rose to 10-15ft, but crashed with damage to the wing, undercarriage and propeller. No other information can be traced on this machine.
GAUNT biplane No.2 'Baby'
First reports of the 'Baby' biplane appeared in Flight of 8 July 1911 (p.592), when Gaunt made a straight flight of two miles. Straight flights up to 100ft high were reported a week later, and these increased progressively up to 300ft high, and to four miles and return. Gaunt apparently flew regularly at Southport in the summer of 1911, and started to instruct Leveson-Gower on 7 September 1911. The machine was still flying in August 1912, but the end seems to have come on 22 August 1912, when it was damaged in an accident.
The machine was an unequal span biplane, with the same Alvaston engine and radiators fitted on either side. Control was by wing warping and conventional tail surfaces. The undercarriage was fitted with two wheels and a central skid; a tail-skid and wingtip skids were provided. The machine was constructed in the conventional style of the time, except for the wings, which were covered with thin French plywood; the separate sheets were fitted with eyelets along the edges, and were laced together with cord.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder, horizontally opposed, water-cooled driving a 7ft diameter Gaunt propeller
Data
Wing area 208 sq ft
Weight 600 lb
Speed 35-50 mph
Gaunt soon discarded the Cycloplane and proceeded to design and construct a twin pusher biplane. The machine was tested in April 1910 at Apperley Bridge, near Bradford, but on 27 April 1910 a petrol explosion occurred, which damaged the machine and badly burned John Gaunt.
The machine was rebuilt and was out again in August, but Gaunt had now moved across to Southport, and rented a hangar adjacent to the sands. After engine problems, the machine appeared to be ready to lift off, until damage occurred through the undercarriage sinking into the soft sand on 30 August 1910. It was probably at this stage that Gaunt decided to save the weight of the heavy chain drives and other fittings by converting the machine to a single propeller tractor.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled.
Data
Wing area 200 sq ft
GAUNT 'See-Saw' aeroplane
The following letter, with sketch, appeared in Flight 11 March 1911 (p.213) and described an unlikely looking biplane, which presumably remained unbuilt.
'I enclose a sketch of the see-saw type of aeroplane that I have invented and for which I claim that it is easier to learn to fly than any other type. The pilot has the whole of the machine in front of him with direct control and "feel" of both elevating and steering handle, which is of gunmetal and similar to the cycle handlebar in use for steering, but with up and down movement for balancing.
Primarily, the invention is to secure a better sense of direction in beam winds. The present loading of aeroplanes is a central disposition of earned weights, which in a beam wind acts as a pivot for the aeroplane to veer round.
Features not to be lost sight of are: the compass is a long way from the engine, so is the pilot, and the provision of a hoeshoe or grapnel will be useful to hold back aeroplane whilst starting engine and as an emergency drag in finishing a flight.
The idea is the outcome of another original machine I have designed, built and flown with an Alvaston Engine. John Gaunt.'
GAUNT monoplane
Flight reported on 1 April 1911 (p.296), trials at Southport of a Gaunt monoplane, by the Hon. WS. Leveson-Gower RN, of which he was part owner. On a third run on 24 March 1911, the machine rose to 10-15ft, but crashed with damage to the wing, undercarriage and propeller. No other information can be traced on this machine.
GAUNT biplane No.2 'Baby'
First reports of the 'Baby' biplane appeared in Flight of 8 July 1911 (p.592), when Gaunt made a straight flight of two miles. Straight flights up to 100ft high were reported a week later, and these increased progressively up to 300ft high, and to four miles and return. Gaunt apparently flew regularly at Southport in the summer of 1911, and started to instruct Leveson-Gower on 7 September 1911. The machine was still flying in August 1912, but the end seems to have come on 22 August 1912, when it was damaged in an accident.
The machine was an unequal span biplane, with the same Alvaston engine and radiators fitted on either side. Control was by wing warping and conventional tail surfaces. The undercarriage was fitted with two wheels and a central skid; a tail-skid and wingtip skids were provided. The machine was constructed in the conventional style of the time, except for the wings, which were covered with thin French plywood; the separate sheets were fitted with eyelets along the edges, and were laced together with cord.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder, horizontally opposed, water-cooled driving a 7ft diameter Gaunt propeller
Data
Wing area 208 sq ft
Weight 600 lb
Speed 35-50 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GEORGE & JOBLING biplane (A.E. George & Jobling, Smith St., Newcastle-on-Tyne, Motor Engineers)
A.E. George, a racing motorist, acquired the Voisin 'Bird of Passage' but abandoned it after a crash at Shellbeach. He subsequently decided to build a machine of his own design, which he was ready to exhibit at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1910. On 13 May 1910 he flew straights up to 130 yards at Eastchurch and, by the end of May, had made twenty flights. At the end of August George had passed the tests for his pilot's certificate on it at Eastchurch. By October the machine was moved north, but on 6 October 1910 at Gosforth Park, Newcastle damage occurred. The machine had flown 300 miles, with a longest flight of eighteen minutes and, although reported to have been repaired and ready to fly again, there was no further report that this took place.
This well designed pusher biplane used bamboo for the booms, which were to be replaced by steel tube. It had front and rear elevators, a single rudder and side panels in the front booms. Midgap ailerons were fitted to the front outboard interplane struts, together with warping extensions to the top wings for lateral control. Small side curtains were also fitted. All controls were operated by the hand-wheel and movement of the control column.
The undercarriage was made of steel tube, and the twin skids could be lowered to aid the passage of the machine over rough ground when alighting. A steerable tailwheel and wing tip skids were fitted.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving through chain a 9ft dia. G&J propeller at 2:1 reduction on a shaft above the engine, the whole being mounted on a subframe. The radiators were of surface type forming part of the lower wing.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 5ft 6in plus 1 ft 3in warpable
Gap 5ft
Area 325 sq ft
Area tailplane 50 sq ft
Area elevators 36 sq ft
Area rudder 22 1/2 sq ft
Area ailerons 27 sq ft
Length 31ft
Weight 662 lb
Weight allup 862 lb
Max speed 48mph
A.E. George, a racing motorist, acquired the Voisin 'Bird of Passage' but abandoned it after a crash at Shellbeach. He subsequently decided to build a machine of his own design, which he was ready to exhibit at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1910. On 13 May 1910 he flew straights up to 130 yards at Eastchurch and, by the end of May, had made twenty flights. At the end of August George had passed the tests for his pilot's certificate on it at Eastchurch. By October the machine was moved north, but on 6 October 1910 at Gosforth Park, Newcastle damage occurred. The machine had flown 300 miles, with a longest flight of eighteen minutes and, although reported to have been repaired and ready to fly again, there was no further report that this took place.
This well designed pusher biplane used bamboo for the booms, which were to be replaced by steel tube. It had front and rear elevators, a single rudder and side panels in the front booms. Midgap ailerons were fitted to the front outboard interplane struts, together with warping extensions to the top wings for lateral control. Small side curtains were also fitted. All controls were operated by the hand-wheel and movement of the control column.
The undercarriage was made of steel tube, and the twin skids could be lowered to aid the passage of the machine over rough ground when alighting. A steerable tailwheel and wing tip skids were fitted.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving through chain a 9ft dia. G&J propeller at 2:1 reduction on a shaft above the engine, the whole being mounted on a subframe. The radiators were of surface type forming part of the lower wing.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 5ft 6in plus 1 ft 3in warpable
Gap 5ft
Area 325 sq ft
Area tailplane 50 sq ft
Area elevators 36 sq ft
Area rudder 22 1/2 sq ft
Area ailerons 27 sq ft
Length 31ft
Weight 662 lb
Weight allup 862 lb
Max speed 48mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GEORGE & JOBLING monoplane
In June 1910, George was preparing the design of a new monoplane. This had the means of retracting both the main and tail wheels for landing on the skids, to reduce the length of run. The machine was a tandem two-seater on the lines of an Antoinette, with a tapered wing capable of being warped over the area, from the intersection of the fuselage at the trailing edge, to the leading edge at the wingtip, namely 32% of the area. The fuselage was parallel in plan, with elongated fins and horizontal surfaces extending forward to the wing junction. The wing area was 200 sq ft and a 90hp motor was estimated to give a speed of 95mph. There is no evidence that construction ever commenced.
In June 1910, George was preparing the design of a new monoplane. This had the means of retracting both the main and tail wheels for landing on the skids, to reduce the length of run. The machine was a tandem two-seater on the lines of an Antoinette, with a tapered wing capable of being warped over the area, from the intersection of the fuselage at the trailing edge, to the leading edge at the wingtip, namely 32% of the area. The fuselage was parallel in plan, with elongated fins and horizontal surfaces extending forward to the wing junction. The wing area was 200 sq ft and a 90hp motor was estimated to give a speed of 95mph. There is no evidence that construction ever commenced.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GERRARD monoplane (F.A. Gerrard, The London Aviation Ground, Acton)
Little is known about this aircraft except that which can be deduced from the illustration in The Aero 28 December 1910 (p.509), which shows it inverted after crashing on 18 December 1910 at Acton.
Although similar to certain Howard Wright designs, the machine had original features. The fuselage girder was deep towards the tail and the strong cabane had a lateral crossbar. This, together with a vertical post for bracing wires above the tailskid, no doubt enabled Gerrard to leave the aircraft unhurt, also preventing damage to the propeller.
The rudder and elevator were on a universal fitting, with a separate tailplane fixed to the lower longerons. The wing tips were rounded, the wings, without ailerons, were presumably warpable.
A gust of wind is reported to have caused the accident and was sufficient to wreck Gerrard's aspirations, for there were no further reports of him or his aircraft.
Little is known about this aircraft except that which can be deduced from the illustration in The Aero 28 December 1910 (p.509), which shows it inverted after crashing on 18 December 1910 at Acton.
Although similar to certain Howard Wright designs, the machine had original features. The fuselage girder was deep towards the tail and the strong cabane had a lateral crossbar. This, together with a vertical post for bracing wires above the tailskid, no doubt enabled Gerrard to leave the aircraft unhurt, also preventing damage to the propeller.
The rudder and elevator were on a universal fitting, with a separate tailplane fixed to the lower longerons. The wing tips were rounded, the wings, without ailerons, were presumably warpable.
A gust of wind is reported to have caused the accident and was sufficient to wreck Gerrard's aspirations, for there were no further reports of him or his aircraft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GIBSON ornithopter (William Gibson, Outram St., West Hartlepool)
This machine was shown at the exhibition at Crystal Palace, organized by the Aeronautical Society in 1868. It consisted of a framework, to which four wings were attached that could be operated by a treadle, so that when two were up, the other pair were down. The machine did not lift off, and Gibson proposed to build a larger one with more area, of which there is no information.
Data
Length of wing 12ft
Chord 1ft 6in tapering to 1ft
Area of two wings 37 sq ft
Weight 41 lb
Weight allup 188 lb (5 lb per sq ft approx.)
This machine was shown at the exhibition at Crystal Palace, organized by the Aeronautical Society in 1868. It consisted of a framework, to which four wings were attached that could be operated by a treadle, so that when two were up, the other pair were down. The machine did not lift off, and Gibson proposed to build a larger one with more area, of which there is no information.
Data
Length of wing 12ft
Chord 1ft 6in tapering to 1ft
Area of two wings 37 sq ft
Weight 41 lb
Weight allup 188 lb (5 lb per sq ft approx.)
Gibson ornithopter of 1868. This optimistic machine was at the Aeronautical Society's Exhibition at the Crystal Palace.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GIBSON biplane No.l (Caledonian Motor & Cycle Works, Leith, near Edinburgh, Scotland. J. and G.T. Gibson, proprietors)
This pusher biplane was designed and built during 1909 by the Gibsons, father and son, at their Caledonian Motor and Cycle Works. It had the typical layout of a machine of the period, with front and rear monoplane elevators and a fixed tailplane and single divided rudder. These units were apparently supported by lower booms only but were presumably braced also by wires. The chassis consisted of short curved skids carrying two pairs of sprung wheels on separate axles.
The wings were of equal span, and single acting ailerons were fitted to both top and bottom. The pilot sat on the lower center section, with the engine, fuel tank and radiators on either side. The machine was not capable of flight.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Data
Span 30ft
GIBSON biplane No.2
The second machine was a reconstruction of the first and was completed in the following year, and flown in August 1910 at Beautland Farm near Balerno.
The modifications included changing the front monoplane elevator to a biplane unit with twin rudders. The attitude of the machine on the ground was altered by lowering the tail, and rigging the machine with slight stagger. The front and rear booms were full depth strut braced units with additional support at the front, provided by the extended, curved Sommer-type skids, which met at the front elevator attachments.
The Gibsons built a further nine biplanes, one of which was shown at the Scottish International Exhibition in 1911. During 1913-1914, they were building a machine of 40ft span and had started to design and build an engine. This work was discontinued when war broke out. Of the eleven machines, four were destroyed during testing, one was burned at an exhibition in Brussels, the rest were sold. No detailed information on the design of these has been found.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Data
Span 29ft
Length 30ft
GIBSON biplane No.3
A letter from John Gibson published in Flight on 19 February 1910 illustrates the third biplane which they had made and sold. This was a Farman type machine with twin pushed propellers driven by a single engine of unknown make. There were twin fins and rudders and ailerons set at mid gap. There was a conventional undercarriage with two main wheels and a tail wheel. No further details have been found.
Gibson mentions that they were making a fourth machine of 29ft span and that a fifth was being made for display at the Olympia Show.
This pusher biplane was designed and built during 1909 by the Gibsons, father and son, at their Caledonian Motor and Cycle Works. It had the typical layout of a machine of the period, with front and rear monoplane elevators and a fixed tailplane and single divided rudder. These units were apparently supported by lower booms only but were presumably braced also by wires. The chassis consisted of short curved skids carrying two pairs of sprung wheels on separate axles.
The wings were of equal span, and single acting ailerons were fitted to both top and bottom. The pilot sat on the lower center section, with the engine, fuel tank and radiators on either side. The machine was not capable of flight.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Data
Span 30ft
GIBSON biplane No.2
The second machine was a reconstruction of the first and was completed in the following year, and flown in August 1910 at Beautland Farm near Balerno.
The modifications included changing the front monoplane elevator to a biplane unit with twin rudders. The attitude of the machine on the ground was altered by lowering the tail, and rigging the machine with slight stagger. The front and rear booms were full depth strut braced units with additional support at the front, provided by the extended, curved Sommer-type skids, which met at the front elevator attachments.
The Gibsons built a further nine biplanes, one of which was shown at the Scottish International Exhibition in 1911. During 1913-1914, they were building a machine of 40ft span and had started to design and build an engine. This work was discontinued when war broke out. Of the eleven machines, four were destroyed during testing, one was burned at an exhibition in Brussels, the rest were sold. No detailed information on the design of these has been found.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Data
Span 29ft
Length 30ft
GIBSON biplane No.3
A letter from John Gibson published in Flight on 19 February 1910 illustrates the third biplane which they had made and sold. This was a Farman type machine with twin pushed propellers driven by a single engine of unknown make. There were twin fins and rudders and ailerons set at mid gap. There was a conventional undercarriage with two main wheels and a tail wheel. No further details have been found.
Gibson mentions that they were making a fourth machine of 29ft span and that a fifth was being made for display at the Olympia Show.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GLOUCESTER military monoplane (Gloucester Aeroplane Co., Barton St., Gloucester. Campbell A. Ping and J.A. Barnet)
This newly formed company made a tractor monoplane, to the design of Campbell Ping, in the summer of 1910. It was of conventional layout, but with a special arrangement, whereby the rear wing spars could be individually moved, by separate pedals, to control the angle of incidence. The wings were single surfaced with fabric, except for a section of the leading edge, tapering from lft 6in to lft along the upper surface, which was also covered. The control units were single surfaced as well. The machine was low powered and lightly constructed.
There is no indication that the machine was ever flown and it later appeared for sale with the effects of W. W. Peet, in bankruptcy, on 20 May 1913, together with a part made tandem monoplane (almost certainly the Webb-Peet monoplane). Previously a 'new type biplane' was said to be under way.
Power: 20-24hp Phoenix five-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 6ft dia. propeller.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 6ft 9in tapering to 5ft
Weight 305 lb
This newly formed company made a tractor monoplane, to the design of Campbell Ping, in the summer of 1910. It was of conventional layout, but with a special arrangement, whereby the rear wing spars could be individually moved, by separate pedals, to control the angle of incidence. The wings were single surfaced with fabric, except for a section of the leading edge, tapering from lft 6in to lft along the upper surface, which was also covered. The control units were single surfaced as well. The machine was low powered and lightly constructed.
There is no indication that the machine was ever flown and it later appeared for sale with the effects of W. W. Peet, in bankruptcy, on 20 May 1913, together with a part made tandem monoplane (almost certainly the Webb-Peet monoplane). Previously a 'new type biplane' was said to be under way.
Power: 20-24hp Phoenix five-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 6ft dia. propeller.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 6ft 9in tapering to 5ft
Weight 305 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GNOSSPELIUS hydro-monoplane No.l (Oscar Theodore Gnosspelius, Silver Holme, Windermere and Borwicks Boatyard, Bowness, Windermere)
Gnosspelius was of Swedish origin, but of English upbringing, and had been involved in civil engineering works abroad. His aviation interest stemmed from the time of the Blackpool Meeting in 1909.
His first machine was much like a Bleriot with a rectangular section open fuselage with pyramid pylon for bracing and warping cables. It was fitted originally with twin floats, with which it would not lift from the water. It was then refitted with a single float 14ft long and 4ft wide sprung by rubber rings.
The machine was under-powered and neither version of the hydroplane was successful when tested between August and November 1910.
Power: 20hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Gnosspelius was of Swedish origin, but of English upbringing, and had been involved in civil engineering works abroad. His aviation interest stemmed from the time of the Blackpool Meeting in 1909.
His first machine was much like a Bleriot with a rectangular section open fuselage with pyramid pylon for bracing and warping cables. It was fitted originally with twin floats, with which it would not lift from the water. It was then refitted with a single float 14ft long and 4ft wide sprung by rubber rings.
The machine was under-powered and neither version of the hydroplane was successful when tested between August and November 1910.
Power: 20hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GNOSSPELIUS hydro-monoplane No.2
The second Gnosspelius machine was designed with a triangular section fuselage, to save weight, and was fitted with a more powerful engine. It was again built at Borwick's at Bowness and was fitted with a central float, together with small wingtip floats of streamlined shape. Trials in this form on Windermere in the spring of 1911 indicated the need for ventilation of the float, to enable it to unstick. In June the float from No.l was fitted with vanes at the bow. An attempt at flight with this float was made on 25 November 1911 which ended with the machine upside down in the water.
The machine was subsequently rebuilt with box type wingtip floats and No.2 flew for the first time on 13 February 1912, after taxiing trials the previous day. Gnosspelius was the pilot for the first and a number of subsequent flights, becoming the first man in the area to design and fly his own aircraft.
The machine continued to fly successfully in the hands of R.C. Kemp and Lt. J.FA. Trotter until the spring of 1914.
Power: 40-50hp Clerget four-cylinder inline, water-cooled.
Data
Area 190 sq ft
Weight 650 lb
Speed 55 mph
Central float (first) 12ft long by 5ft wide
(second) 14ft long by 4ft wide
The second Gnosspelius machine was designed with a triangular section fuselage, to save weight, and was fitted with a more powerful engine. It was again built at Borwick's at Bowness and was fitted with a central float, together with small wingtip floats of streamlined shape. Trials in this form on Windermere in the spring of 1911 indicated the need for ventilation of the float, to enable it to unstick. In June the float from No.l was fitted with vanes at the bow. An attempt at flight with this float was made on 25 November 1911 which ended with the machine upside down in the water.
The machine was subsequently rebuilt with box type wingtip floats and No.2 flew for the first time on 13 February 1912, after taxiing trials the previous day. Gnosspelius was the pilot for the first and a number of subsequent flights, becoming the first man in the area to design and fly his own aircraft.
The machine continued to fly successfully in the hands of R.C. Kemp and Lt. J.FA. Trotter until the spring of 1914.
Power: 40-50hp Clerget four-cylinder inline, water-cooled.
Data
Area 190 sq ft
Weight 650 lb
Speed 55 mph
Central float (first) 12ft long by 5ft wide
(second) 14ft long by 4ft wide
Gnosspelius No.2 hydro-monoplane was tested in 1911 but could not be flown until 1912 after changes to the floats.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GNOSSPELIUS hydro-biplane
After receiving Aviators Certificate No.360 in March 1912, the first to be issued to a pilot trained on a hydro-aeroplane, Lt. Trotter ordered a two-seater biplane to be designed by Gnosspelius. The machine was launched by the 8 September 1913, but did not takeoff until 20 September 1913, when Trotter alighted heavily immediately after lifting off and damaged the chassis and propeller. After repairs and a change of main float, only limited flying took place due to various problems, the machine apparently being flown for the last time on 11 November 1913.
The four-bladed propeller was geared down by chain and sprockets from the 100hp Green, six-cylinder inline, water-cooled engine, which was not powerful enough for the heavy aircraft that Gnosspelius had designed. A large radiator was mounted alongside the passenger seat on the port side. The three bay wings had ailerons on the top plane only. No fin was fitted and the rudder post extended down to carry a water rudder.
After receiving Aviators Certificate No.360 in March 1912, the first to be issued to a pilot trained on a hydro-aeroplane, Lt. Trotter ordered a two-seater biplane to be designed by Gnosspelius. The machine was launched by the 8 September 1913, but did not takeoff until 20 September 1913, when Trotter alighted heavily immediately after lifting off and damaged the chassis and propeller. After repairs and a change of main float, only limited flying took place due to various problems, the machine apparently being flown for the last time on 11 November 1913.
The four-bladed propeller was geared down by chain and sprockets from the 100hp Green, six-cylinder inline, water-cooled engine, which was not powerful enough for the heavy aircraft that Gnosspelius had designed. A large radiator was mounted alongside the passenger seat on the port side. The three bay wings had ailerons on the top plane only. No fin was fitted and the rudder post extended down to carry a water rudder.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GOLDMAN Crucifer biplane (L. Goldman)
This ambitious streamlined biplane was designed by Goldman in 1909 and was built as a model; a full size machine may have been commenced, but there is no evidence that it was ever completed.
The swept back wings were mounted on the torpedo like body on a ball bearing collar so that if a sudden gust of wind struck underneath one wing it moved about the central body without imparting motion to this since it was mounted on the sliding collar.
The engine was mounted within the body and drove twin propellers, mounted in midgap behind the wing, by chains or shafts and gears.
The wings could be folded back over the body and the engine was connected by suitable gearing to the wheels so that the aeroplane with its wings folded could be driven along a road. Lack of finance prevented further development of this clever design.
This ambitious streamlined biplane was designed by Goldman in 1909 and was built as a model; a full size machine may have been commenced, but there is no evidence that it was ever completed.
The swept back wings were mounted on the torpedo like body on a ball bearing collar so that if a sudden gust of wind struck underneath one wing it moved about the central body without imparting motion to this since it was mounted on the sliding collar.
The engine was mounted within the body and drove twin propellers, mounted in midgap behind the wing, by chains or shafts and gears.
The wings could be folded back over the body and the engine was connected by suitable gearing to the wheels so that the aeroplane with its wings folded could be driven along a road. Lack of finance prevented further development of this clever design.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GOODDEN Dragonfly monoplane (Frank Widenham Goodden, Elmthorpe Rd., Wolvercote, Oxfordshire)
A gale in November 1911 destroyed the Imperial Aero Club, at Port Meadow, Oxford owned by J. Bett & Co., where Gooden was employed. He purchased the remains and built a new shed, in which he built a tractor monoplane. He flew this single-seater from the middle to the end of 1912, when he sold out and moved to Hendon. The Dragonfly was destroyed by fire, with the buildings, on 6 August 1913.
The fuselage was of circular section, plywood covered at the front and faired to match at the rear, with stringers and fabric covering. The machine was of conventional layout and rested on its main wheels and front skid.
The wings were cut back to the rear spar alongside the fuselage and were fitted with trailing ailerons, and braced by many cables to a pylon and the undercarriage structure. The flowing lines of the tail surfaces perhaps inspired the name.
Power: 35hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data
Span 30ft
Area 168 sq ft
Length 25 ft
Weight allup 650lb
Max speed 60 mph
A gale in November 1911 destroyed the Imperial Aero Club, at Port Meadow, Oxford owned by J. Bett & Co., where Gooden was employed. He purchased the remains and built a new shed, in which he built a tractor monoplane. He flew this single-seater from the middle to the end of 1912, when he sold out and moved to Hendon. The Dragonfly was destroyed by fire, with the buildings, on 6 August 1913.
The fuselage was of circular section, plywood covered at the front and faired to match at the rear, with stringers and fabric covering. The machine was of conventional layout and rested on its main wheels and front skid.
The wings were cut back to the rear spar alongside the fuselage and were fitted with trailing ailerons, and braced by many cables to a pylon and the undercarriage structure. The flowing lines of the tail surfaces perhaps inspired the name.
Power: 35hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data
Span 30ft
Area 168 sq ft
Length 25 ft
Weight allup 650lb
Max speed 60 mph
Goodden Dragonfly built and flown in 1912 by Frank Goodden, the famous Farnborough testpilot killed in the SE.5 prototype.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GOULD biplane & monoplane (Gould & Co., London Inn Square, Exeter, Devon)
A pusher biplane was offered for sale in February 1910 and was illustrated in a partly built state in The Aero. A Bleriot type tractor monoplane designed by George Weeks and fitted with an Anzani engine and Cochrane propeller was also built in the same year.
A pusher biplane was offered for sale in February 1910 and was illustrated in a partly built state in The Aero. A Bleriot type tractor monoplane designed by George Weeks and fitted with an Anzani engine and Cochrane propeller was also built in the same year.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE AVIATION Co. (Claude Grahame-White, Hendon Aerodrome)
Grahame-White operated a successful motor business and, after a brief period of ballooning, turned to heavier than air machines in 1909, after the developments in France and Bleriot's Channel crossing. He learnt to fly at the Bleriot School at the end of the year, receiving Brevet No.30 of the Aero Club de France in January 1910. Thereafter he set up his own flying school at Pau, later transferring this temporarily to Brooklands. In May 1910 The Aero reported that he rented ground at Park Royal, near the Plumes Hotel, but this report was premature. The report also referred to 'half a dozen monoplanes of Bleriot type', built at his workshop at Walham Green, under the supervision of R.W.A. Brewer.
The school was moved to Hendon in 1911, where Grahame-White also ran many flying displays, which made Hendon famous. He also established his manufacturing company there, early in 1911, and this operated into the early postwar period, but was forced into receivership in 1922. From 1913 to 1915, J.D. North, later of Boulton and Paul, was in charge of design.
Farman and Bleriot machines from the French factories had been used by Grahame-White since 1909, but when his school commenced operations the number of machines was increased. The aircraft in use in 1911-1912 were often reported to be 'British-built Farmans' but the number actually made is uncertain. To indicate the scale of operations, reports at times referred to biplane No. 10 and monoplane No.6. A photograph in Flight 11 February 1911 (p. 114) showed five Bleriots, one Farman and one G.W. Baby already available. The manufacture of aircraft developed from Farman types, to those of original design, and the production capacity was enhanced by a large addition of plant and machinery in October 1911.
GRAHAME-WHITE Sommer type biplane
A single propeller, pusher type biplane with seats for two was exhibited at Gamages store from 6 to 11 June 1910, with which Grahame-White was hoping to fly to Paris from London. It was described as 'British-built', and was constructed before the works at Hendon were established. It was made by the Windham Detachable Motor Body Co. Nothing more was heard of this machine at the time.
In some respects like a Sommer biplane, the machine had front booms and long curved skids, to which the front elevator was hinged. Rear booms carried a fixed tailplane but no rudder. The front spars of the wings were at the leading edge. Large single acting ailerons hung from the rear spars of the top wings, with additional fixed trailing edge surfaces inboard of these.
A later reference states that a Sommer biplane was dismantled at Brooklands by Compton Paterson, at that time a GW pilot, and in November it was being reassembled with a Gnome engine for the use of the pupils. Although not confirmed, this is presumed to refer to this machine.
Power: 40hp Humber four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 33ft
Gap 5ft 9in
Length of tail, rear of wings 23ft
Area 450 sq ft
Weight allup 800lb
WINDHAM biplane No.2
In 1910 Windham built a biplane for Grahame-White, who intended to use it for a flight from London to Paris, which he never carried out. This machine was exhibited at Gamages in the summer of 1910, and is already described as the Grahame-White Biplane Type 1 (q. v.). It was made before Grahame-White had established his own manufacturing facilities.
Grahame-White operated a successful motor business and, after a brief period of ballooning, turned to heavier than air machines in 1909, after the developments in France and Bleriot's Channel crossing. He learnt to fly at the Bleriot School at the end of the year, receiving Brevet No.30 of the Aero Club de France in January 1910. Thereafter he set up his own flying school at Pau, later transferring this temporarily to Brooklands. In May 1910 The Aero reported that he rented ground at Park Royal, near the Plumes Hotel, but this report was premature. The report also referred to 'half a dozen monoplanes of Bleriot type', built at his workshop at Walham Green, under the supervision of R.W.A. Brewer.
The school was moved to Hendon in 1911, where Grahame-White also ran many flying displays, which made Hendon famous. He also established his manufacturing company there, early in 1911, and this operated into the early postwar period, but was forced into receivership in 1922. From 1913 to 1915, J.D. North, later of Boulton and Paul, was in charge of design.
Farman and Bleriot machines from the French factories had been used by Grahame-White since 1909, but when his school commenced operations the number of machines was increased. The aircraft in use in 1911-1912 were often reported to be 'British-built Farmans' but the number actually made is uncertain. To indicate the scale of operations, reports at times referred to biplane No. 10 and monoplane No.6. A photograph in Flight 11 February 1911 (p. 114) showed five Bleriots, one Farman and one G.W. Baby already available. The manufacture of aircraft developed from Farman types, to those of original design, and the production capacity was enhanced by a large addition of plant and machinery in October 1911.
GRAHAME-WHITE Sommer type biplane
A single propeller, pusher type biplane with seats for two was exhibited at Gamages store from 6 to 11 June 1910, with which Grahame-White was hoping to fly to Paris from London. It was described as 'British-built', and was constructed before the works at Hendon were established. It was made by the Windham Detachable Motor Body Co. Nothing more was heard of this machine at the time.
In some respects like a Sommer biplane, the machine had front booms and long curved skids, to which the front elevator was hinged. Rear booms carried a fixed tailplane but no rudder. The front spars of the wings were at the leading edge. Large single acting ailerons hung from the rear spars of the top wings, with additional fixed trailing edge surfaces inboard of these.
A later reference states that a Sommer biplane was dismantled at Brooklands by Compton Paterson, at that time a GW pilot, and in November it was being reassembled with a Gnome engine for the use of the pupils. Although not confirmed, this is presumed to refer to this machine.
Power: 40hp Humber four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 33ft
Gap 5ft 9in
Length of tail, rear of wings 23ft
Area 450 sq ft
Weight allup 800lb
WINDHAM biplane No.2
In 1910 Windham built a biplane for Grahame-White, who intended to use it for a flight from London to Paris, which he never carried out. This machine was exhibited at Gamages in the summer of 1910, and is already described as the Grahame-White Biplane Type 1 (q. v.). It was made before Grahame-White had established his own manufacturing facilities.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE Baby & New Baby biplane
While competing in America, in the autumn of 1910, Grahame-White arranged for an aircraft to be constructed to his requirements by the Burgess Co. of Marblehead, Mass. It is recorded here although not strictly British. The machine arrived at Hendon in January 1911 and made its first flight on 11 February 1911 in the hands of the owner.
The Baby was a scaled down Farman-type, with front and rear elevators carried on booms and with ailerons on all wings, and was capable of carrying a passenger. The platform, for the crew and the engine, was tilted to increase propeller ground clearance, due to the low overall height. The crew were completely exposed in the aircraft as received, but a primitive nacelle was added before the machine appeared at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911.
A much modified version for racing had rear booms tapering down to a single tail plane, with semicircular split elevators. The front boom and elevators were removed and a ring cowling fitted round the engine. An undercarriage with two wheels and nosewheel was used.
A note in Flight 11 November 1911 (p.985), refers to a 50hp Indian-engined version dispatched to California for use during Grahame-White's second U.S. tour. The Indian engine was a modified version of the Gnome made by the Hendee Manufacturing Co. However most use was made of a Nieuport monoplane during this visit.
In 1911 the Grahame-White Aviation Co. were advertising as manufacturers of the Baby aircraft, but it is not clear how many, if any, were British built. A crate from Burgess, presumably delivering another Baby arrived at Hendon in March 1911.
Power:
50hp Gnome (?950) or 70hp (?1050) seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 7ft 6in diameter propeller mounted ahead of the engine.
50hp Indian. Gnome made by Hendee.
Data
Span 27ft
Chord 4ft 9in
Gap 4ft 10in
Area 235 sq ft
Area front elevator 19 1/4 sq ft
Area rear elevator 10 1/2 sq ft
Area tailplanes 37 1/2 sq ft
Area rudders 12 1/2 sq ft
Length 32ft 3in
Height 8ft 6in
Weight 420 lb
Weight allup 655 lb
Max. speed 55mph improved to 60-65mph in July 1911
Endurance 1 l/2hr
While competing in America, in the autumn of 1910, Grahame-White arranged for an aircraft to be constructed to his requirements by the Burgess Co. of Marblehead, Mass. It is recorded here although not strictly British. The machine arrived at Hendon in January 1911 and made its first flight on 11 February 1911 in the hands of the owner.
The Baby was a scaled down Farman-type, with front and rear elevators carried on booms and with ailerons on all wings, and was capable of carrying a passenger. The platform, for the crew and the engine, was tilted to increase propeller ground clearance, due to the low overall height. The crew were completely exposed in the aircraft as received, but a primitive nacelle was added before the machine appeared at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911.
A much modified version for racing had rear booms tapering down to a single tail plane, with semicircular split elevators. The front boom and elevators were removed and a ring cowling fitted round the engine. An undercarriage with two wheels and nosewheel was used.
A note in Flight 11 November 1911 (p.985), refers to a 50hp Indian-engined version dispatched to California for use during Grahame-White's second U.S. tour. The Indian engine was a modified version of the Gnome made by the Hendee Manufacturing Co. However most use was made of a Nieuport monoplane during this visit.
In 1911 the Grahame-White Aviation Co. were advertising as manufacturers of the Baby aircraft, but it is not clear how many, if any, were British built. A crate from Burgess, presumably delivering another Baby arrived at Hendon in March 1911.
Power:
50hp Gnome (?950) or 70hp (?1050) seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 7ft 6in diameter propeller mounted ahead of the engine.
50hp Indian. Gnome made by Hendee.
Data
Span 27ft
Chord 4ft 9in
Gap 4ft 10in
Area 235 sq ft
Area front elevator 19 1/4 sq ft
Area rear elevator 10 1/2 sq ft
Area tailplanes 37 1/2 sq ft
Area rudders 12 1/2 sq ft
Length 32ft 3in
Height 8ft 6in
Weight 420 lb
Weight allup 655 lb
Max. speed 55mph improved to 60-65mph in July 1911
Endurance 1 l/2hr
GW New Baby. This is probably the second machine also built by Burgess, which arrived at Hendon in March 1911.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE Baby & New Baby biplane
<...>
A much modified version for racing had rear booms tapering down to a single tail plane, with semicircular split elevators. The front boom and elevators were removed and a ring cowling fitted round the engine. An undercarriage with two wheels and nosewheel was used.
<...>
GRAHAME-WHITE Boxkite type biplanes
These Farman type biplanes, used from 1911 onwards for training purposes at Hendon, contained variations between individual machines. Most had a single rudder and were powered by a 50hp Gnome rotary engine. One early machine had been built at the end of 1910 to compete in the Baron de Forest Contest to be flown by Gresswell, but this was prevented by damage on the ground at Dover, in a gale. To qualify, it was fitted with a 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee engine made at Willesden. After repair it flew at Hendon as School Biplane No.l, from 21 January 1911 until February, when a 60hp Wolseley was substituted, the ENV being reinstated in September 1911.
One of the school biplanes with 50hp Gnome was bought by the War Office in 1913, identified as serial No.309, and based at Farnborough.
<...>
A much modified version for racing had rear booms tapering down to a single tail plane, with semicircular split elevators. The front boom and elevators were removed and a ring cowling fitted round the engine. An undercarriage with two wheels and nosewheel was used.
<...>
GRAHAME-WHITE Boxkite type biplanes
These Farman type biplanes, used from 1911 onwards for training purposes at Hendon, contained variations between individual machines. Most had a single rudder and were powered by a 50hp Gnome rotary engine. One early machine had been built at the end of 1910 to compete in the Baron de Forest Contest to be flown by Gresswell, but this was prevented by damage on the ground at Dover, in a gale. To qualify, it was fitted with a 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee engine made at Willesden. After repair it flew at Hendon as School Biplane No.l, from 21 January 1911 until February, when a 60hp Wolseley was substituted, the ENV being reinstated in September 1911.
One of the school biplanes with 50hp Gnome was bought by the War Office in 1913, identified as serial No.309, and based at Farnborough.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE monoplane Type IX
W. Rowland Ding was the designer of this small single-seater with monocoque fuselage, which flew straights at Hendon for the first time on 7 September 1912 in the hands of Marcel Desoutter. The machine was a conventional braced monoplane with warping wings and twin skid undercarriage; a silencer was fitted to the exhaust system. The aircraft was under powered, and the 35hp engine was reported replaced by a 50hp Gnome, but even this did not solve the problems of the Type IX, and there was no further news of this machine.
Power:
Type A 35hp Anzani three-cylinder Y type air-cooled radial with silencer driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Type B 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 7ft 10in propeller
Data Type A Type B
Span 32ft -
Chord 6ft 6in -
Area 208 sq ft -
Area tailplane 18 sq ft -
Area elevators 15 sq ft -
Area rudder 11 sq ft -
Length 21ft -
Height 9ft -
Speed 50-55 mph 65 mph
Endurance 3 1/2hr 4 hr
Price ?550 ?850
W. Rowland Ding was the designer of this small single-seater with monocoque fuselage, which flew straights at Hendon for the first time on 7 September 1912 in the hands of Marcel Desoutter. The machine was a conventional braced monoplane with warping wings and twin skid undercarriage; a silencer was fitted to the exhaust system. The aircraft was under powered, and the 35hp engine was reported replaced by a 50hp Gnome, but even this did not solve the problems of the Type IX, and there was no further news of this machine.
Power:
Type A 35hp Anzani three-cylinder Y type air-cooled radial with silencer driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Type B 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 7ft 10in propeller
Data Type A Type B
Span 32ft -
Chord 6ft 6in -
Area 208 sq ft -
Area tailplane 18 sq ft -
Area elevators 15 sq ft -
Area rudder 11 sq ft -
Length 21ft -
Height 9ft -
Speed 50-55 mph 65 mph
Endurance 3 1/2hr 4 hr
Price ?550 ?850
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE biplane, nicknamed 'Lizzie' or 'Tea Tray'
Following demonstrations of looping by Pegoud at Hendon in September 1913, a strange single-seater biplane was constructed for racing and aerobatic work. This machine was made from the fuselage of a Morane-Saulnier monoplane and a set of biplane wings of a Popular. It flew for the first time on 22 November 1913. In this form it flew successfully until some time in 1914, when the lower wings were replaced with wings of near equal span to the top ones, and additional struts converted the machine into a two bay biplane.
Its demise is not recorded, but a photograph of the Blackburn Type L seaplane in the Olympia Works at Leeds shows 'Lizzie' in the background.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 7ft 6in diameter propeller
Data
Span top 28ft 6in
Span bottom 14ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft 3 in
Length 21ft 10in
Area 220 sq ft
Area elevators 15 sq ft
Area rudder 10 sq ft
Weight allup 850 lb
Max speed 65 mph
Following demonstrations of looping by Pegoud at Hendon in September 1913, a strange single-seater biplane was constructed for racing and aerobatic work. This machine was made from the fuselage of a Morane-Saulnier monoplane and a set of biplane wings of a Popular. It flew for the first time on 22 November 1913. In this form it flew successfully until some time in 1914, when the lower wings were replaced with wings of near equal span to the top ones, and additional struts converted the machine into a two bay biplane.
Its demise is not recorded, but a photograph of the Blackburn Type L seaplane in the Olympia Works at Leeds shows 'Lizzie' in the background.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 7ft 6in diameter propeller
Data
Span top 28ft 6in
Span bottom 14ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft 3 in
Length 21ft 10in
Area 220 sq ft
Area elevators 15 sq ft
Area rudder 10 sq ft
Weight allup 850 lb
Max speed 65 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE Boxkite type biplanes
These Farman type biplanes, used from 1911 onwards for training purposes at Hendon, contained variations between individual machines. Most had a single rudder and were powered by a 50hp Gnome rotary engine. One early machine had been built at the end of 1910 to compete in the Baron de Forest Contest to be flown by Gresswell, but this was prevented by damage on the ground at Dover, in a gale. To qualify, it was fitted with a 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee engine made at Willesden. After repair it flew at Hendon as School Biplane No.l, from 21 January 1911 until February, when a 60hp Wolseley was substituted, the ENV being reinstated in September 1911.
One of the school biplanes with 50hp Gnome was bought by the War Office in 1913, identified as serial No.309, and based at Farnborough.
GRAHAME-WHITE pusher type biplanes from 1912 leading to Type XV
In 1912-1913, a Boxkite with twin rudders, the bi-rudder 'bus, still with front elevator and exposed crew was used extensively at Hendon. On 27 November 1913, flown by Marcus D. Manton, it was used to demonstrate the use of a Lewis machine gun for firing at ground targets at Bisley. A similar machine to this, RNAS No. 1600, was supplied to the Admiralty early in 1915. This became the prototype for further batches, supplied in wartime to the RNAS and later to the RFC, to a total of 135 aircraft.
The early deliveries were fitted with a front elevator, which was discarded at some stage, and a nacelle for pilot and passenger, with full dual controls, was fitted. The top wings could be fitted with extensions, and the ailerons were fitted with balance cables. A variety of engines was fitted, including the 60hp Le Rhone, the 70 and 80hp Gnome air-cooled rotaries and the 60hp Green water-cooled type.
Despite the considerable differences between the early and later types, still being delivered in 1917, these aircraft were generally known as the Type XV.
These Farman type biplanes, used from 1911 onwards for training purposes at Hendon, contained variations between individual machines. Most had a single rudder and were powered by a 50hp Gnome rotary engine. One early machine had been built at the end of 1910 to compete in the Baron de Forest Contest to be flown by Gresswell, but this was prevented by damage on the ground at Dover, in a gale. To qualify, it was fitted with a 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee engine made at Willesden. After repair it flew at Hendon as School Biplane No.l, from 21 January 1911 until February, when a 60hp Wolseley was substituted, the ENV being reinstated in September 1911.
One of the school biplanes with 50hp Gnome was bought by the War Office in 1913, identified as serial No.309, and based at Farnborough.
GRAHAME-WHITE pusher type biplanes from 1912 leading to Type XV
In 1912-1913, a Boxkite with twin rudders, the bi-rudder 'bus, still with front elevator and exposed crew was used extensively at Hendon. On 27 November 1913, flown by Marcus D. Manton, it was used to demonstrate the use of a Lewis machine gun for firing at ground targets at Bisley. A similar machine to this, RNAS No. 1600, was supplied to the Admiralty early in 1915. This became the prototype for further batches, supplied in wartime to the RNAS and later to the RFC, to a total of 135 aircraft.
The early deliveries were fitted with a front elevator, which was discarded at some stage, and a nacelle for pilot and passenger, with full dual controls, was fitted. The top wings could be fitted with extensions, and the ailerons were fitted with balance cables. A variety of engines was fitted, including the 60hp Le Rhone, the 70 and 80hp Gnome air-cooled rotaries and the 60hp Green water-cooled type.
Despite the considerable differences between the early and later types, still being delivered in 1917, these aircraft were generally known as the Type XV.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE Military biplane Type VI
This two-seater pusher biplane was shown at Olympia in February 1913 and was one of the earliest attempts to produce an aircraft with offensive capability.
The engine was front mounted driving the propeller, through shaft and chain, at the rear of the nacelle. A Colt machine-gun above the engine, with a wide field of fire, could be operated by a gunner in the front cockpit.
An unusual feature was the triangular section rear boom consisting of tubular longitudinal members, the top one protruding forward through a bearing in the propeller boss, enabling the control wires to pass through to the tail.
The undercarriage incorporated wide skids, which carried the wheels on sprung mountings. The wheels each had two rims fitted with separate tires to prevent canting of the wheels on bumpy surfaces. Roll control was by wing warping.
The basic design was attributed to Horatio Barber, with J.D. North responsible for the final design work.
Power: 90hp Austro-Daimler or 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water cooled driving a 10ft diameter Chauviere propeller through shaft and Brampton chain.
Note: The engine fitted at the Olympia Show was of 90hp. It is doubtful if the 120hp Austro-Daimler was ever fitted for little was heard of this machine after the Show.
Data
Span top 42ft 6in
Span bottom 23ft
Chord 6ft lin
Gap 7ft
Length 33ft 9in
Wing area 435 sq ft
Area tailplane 50 sq ft
Area elevators 25 sq ft
Area rudder 20 sq ft
Weight empty 2100 lb
2200 lb with 120hp engine
Weight allup 2750 lb
2850 lb with 120hp engine
Speed 50-70 mph
Endurance 6 hours
This two-seater pusher biplane was shown at Olympia in February 1913 and was one of the earliest attempts to produce an aircraft with offensive capability.
The engine was front mounted driving the propeller, through shaft and chain, at the rear of the nacelle. A Colt machine-gun above the engine, with a wide field of fire, could be operated by a gunner in the front cockpit.
An unusual feature was the triangular section rear boom consisting of tubular longitudinal members, the top one protruding forward through a bearing in the propeller boss, enabling the control wires to pass through to the tail.
The undercarriage incorporated wide skids, which carried the wheels on sprung mountings. The wheels each had two rims fitted with separate tires to prevent canting of the wheels on bumpy surfaces. Roll control was by wing warping.
The basic design was attributed to Horatio Barber, with J.D. North responsible for the final design work.
Power: 90hp Austro-Daimler or 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water cooled driving a 10ft diameter Chauviere propeller through shaft and Brampton chain.
Note: The engine fitted at the Olympia Show was of 90hp. It is doubtful if the 120hp Austro-Daimler was ever fitted for little was heard of this machine after the Show.
Data
Span top 42ft 6in
Span bottom 23ft
Chord 6ft lin
Gap 7ft
Length 33ft 9in
Wing area 435 sq ft
Area tailplane 50 sq ft
Area elevators 25 sq ft
Area rudder 20 sq ft
Weight empty 2100 lb
2200 lb with 120hp engine
Weight allup 2750 lb
2850 lb with 120hp engine
Speed 50-70 mph
Endurance 6 hours
THE NEW 90-H.P. MILITARY GRAHAME-WHITE BIPLANE. - It will be seen that a quick-firing gun is mounted on the nose of the body. It can operate throughout a range of 50° vertically and 90° horizontally.
GW Type VI Military biplane was never used by the RFC.
GW Type VI Military biplane was never used by the RFC.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE Popular biplane Type VII
The single-seat Popular, designed by J.D. North, appeared at Hendon in the last week of January 1913. It was also offered as a two-seater with 50hp Gnome, which was apparently not built. The single aircraft built was acquired by the War Office as No.283 in March 1913.
The wide spaced booms tapered to the tail in side view and, together with the very short span lower wing, gave the machine a gawky appearance, not enhanced by the wide track undercarriage and squarish nacelle. The top wing was fitted with ailerons and there was a full width elevator and divided rudder. The machine rested on its four wheels and rear portions of the main skids; there was no separate tail-skid.
Power: 35hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled Y-type radial driving a 7ft diameter GW propeller
Data
Span top 28ft.
Span bottom 14ft
Chord 5ft 3in
Area 205 sq ft
Area tailplane 20 sq ft
Area elevator 14 sq ft
Area rudder 10 sq ft
Length 23ft 6in
Speed range 4060 mph
Price ?400
GRAHAME-WHITE Popular passenger biplane Type VIIC
Derived from the Boxkite, rather than the Popular Type VII, this appears to be a variation evolved in the works under Mr. Bill Law, the superintendent, prior to the appointment of J.D. North as chief designer.
The obvious differences were the removal of the front booms and elevator, and the fitting of a projecting nacelle. The tail booms were apparently raked downwards. This machine was acquired by the War Office in March 1913 and identified as serial No.354 at Farnborough.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 38ft
Chord 6ft 3in
Gap 5ft 10in
Area 475 sq ft
Area tailplane 40 sq ft
Area elevator 9 1/2 sq ft
Area rudder 14 sq ft
Length 26ft 10in
Height 9ft 10in
Speed 45 mph
Endurance 4hr
GRAHAME-WHITE Popular biplane Type VII (1913 version)
A considerably different version of the Type VII appeared in the Grahame-White catalogue of 1913. This is the version that would have been built if orders had been received. The main difference from the version flown was in the tail structure. The tail booms tapered in plan to a point at the rear and were virtually parallel in side elevation. The nacelle was of an improved rounded shape and was lowered onto the bottom wing. The tailplane, with divided elevator, was fitted on the top longerons, together with a tall, one piece rudder and sprung tail-skid, which enabled the main skids to be reduced in length.
Power:
Type A 35hp Anzani three-cylinder Y type radial driving a 7ft diameter GW propeller
Type B 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span top 29ft 2in
Span bottom 17ft
Chord 5ft
Gap 5ft
Area 230 sq ft
Area tailplane 28 sq ft
Area elevator 20 sq ft
Area rudder 12 sq ft
Speed Type A 45-50mph
Speed Type B 50-60mph
Endurance 4hr
Price Type A ?400
Price Type B ?660
The single-seat Popular, designed by J.D. North, appeared at Hendon in the last week of January 1913. It was also offered as a two-seater with 50hp Gnome, which was apparently not built. The single aircraft built was acquired by the War Office as No.283 in March 1913.
The wide spaced booms tapered to the tail in side view and, together with the very short span lower wing, gave the machine a gawky appearance, not enhanced by the wide track undercarriage and squarish nacelle. The top wing was fitted with ailerons and there was a full width elevator and divided rudder. The machine rested on its four wheels and rear portions of the main skids; there was no separate tail-skid.
Power: 35hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled Y-type radial driving a 7ft diameter GW propeller
Data
Span top 28ft.
Span bottom 14ft
Chord 5ft 3in
Area 205 sq ft
Area tailplane 20 sq ft
Area elevator 14 sq ft
Area rudder 10 sq ft
Length 23ft 6in
Speed range 4060 mph
Price ?400
GRAHAME-WHITE Popular passenger biplane Type VIIC
Derived from the Boxkite, rather than the Popular Type VII, this appears to be a variation evolved in the works under Mr. Bill Law, the superintendent, prior to the appointment of J.D. North as chief designer.
The obvious differences were the removal of the front booms and elevator, and the fitting of a projecting nacelle. The tail booms were apparently raked downwards. This machine was acquired by the War Office in March 1913 and identified as serial No.354 at Farnborough.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 38ft
Chord 6ft 3in
Gap 5ft 10in
Area 475 sq ft
Area tailplane 40 sq ft
Area elevator 9 1/2 sq ft
Area rudder 14 sq ft
Length 26ft 10in
Height 9ft 10in
Speed 45 mph
Endurance 4hr
GRAHAME-WHITE Popular biplane Type VII (1913 version)
A considerably different version of the Type VII appeared in the Grahame-White catalogue of 1913. This is the version that would have been built if orders had been received. The main difference from the version flown was in the tail structure. The tail booms tapered in plan to a point at the rear and were virtually parallel in side elevation. The nacelle was of an improved rounded shape and was lowered onto the bottom wing. The tailplane, with divided elevator, was fitted on the top longerons, together with a tall, one piece rudder and sprung tail-skid, which enabled the main skids to be reduced in length.
Power:
Type A 35hp Anzani three-cylinder Y type radial driving a 7ft diameter GW propeller
Type B 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span top 29ft 2in
Span bottom 17ft
Chord 5ft
Gap 5ft
Area 230 sq ft
Area tailplane 28 sq ft
Area elevator 20 sq ft
Area rudder 12 sq ft
Speed Type A 45-50mph
Speed Type B 50-60mph
Endurance 4hr
Price Type A ?400
Price Type B ?660
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE hydro-biplane Type VIII
Intended for the private owner, the Type VIII twin float seaplane, another design by J.D. North, was shown at Olympia in February 1913.
The machine was a conventional tractor biplane of unequal span. The passenger was seated well forward, with a fuel tank between him and the pilot. There were three pairs of interplane struts, the inboard set, adjacent to the fuselage, in lieu of center section struts. The 10ft overhang of the top plane, which carried the ailerons, was braced to triangular kingposts and could be folded down for storage. The floats had a single step and a concave rear underside and were air ventilated. The Type VIII was also flown at Hendon as a land-plane with a cumbersome undercarriage, with four main, and two nose wheels, plus a tail-skid.
The machine was acquired by the War Office in April 1913 in land-plane form. It was possibly to be serial No.287, but was struck off charge on 26 November 1913.
Power:
Type A 60hp Anzani six-cylinder air-cooled radial driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller
Type B 70-80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span top 42ft 6in
Span bottom 24ft *
Chord 5ft
Gap 5ft
Floats 15ft. long, 1ft. 9in. beam, lft.3in. deep
Area 380 sq ft *
Length 25ft
Height 12ft
Weight 850 lb
Weight allup 1,300 1b
Speed Type A 45-55 mph
Speed Type B 50-65 mph
Endurance 3 1/24 hr
Price Type A seaplane ?900
Price Type B ?1,250
*Also quoted as 22ft 6in and 335 sq ft respectively
Above data from GW catalogue
Intended for the private owner, the Type VIII twin float seaplane, another design by J.D. North, was shown at Olympia in February 1913.
The machine was a conventional tractor biplane of unequal span. The passenger was seated well forward, with a fuel tank between him and the pilot. There were three pairs of interplane struts, the inboard set, adjacent to the fuselage, in lieu of center section struts. The 10ft overhang of the top plane, which carried the ailerons, was braced to triangular kingposts and could be folded down for storage. The floats had a single step and a concave rear underside and were air ventilated. The Type VIII was also flown at Hendon as a land-plane with a cumbersome undercarriage, with four main, and two nose wheels, plus a tail-skid.
The machine was acquired by the War Office in April 1913 in land-plane form. It was possibly to be serial No.287, but was struck off charge on 26 November 1913.
Power:
Type A 60hp Anzani six-cylinder air-cooled radial driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller
Type B 70-80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span top 42ft 6in
Span bottom 24ft *
Chord 5ft
Gap 5ft
Floats 15ft. long, 1ft. 9in. beam, lft.3in. deep
Area 380 sq ft *
Length 25ft
Height 12ft
Weight 850 lb
Weight allup 1,300 1b
Speed Type A 45-55 mph
Speed Type B 50-65 mph
Endurance 3 1/24 hr
Price Type A seaplane ?900
Price Type B ?1,250
*Also quoted as 22ft 6in and 335 sq ft respectively
Above data from GW catalogue
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE Charabanc biplane Type X
This was a further J.D. North design for passenger carrying, seating four passengers in wicker seats behind the pilot; it was later reported flying with eleven persons aboard. In appearance it resembled a scaled-up Henry Farman biplane with two and a half bays, top wing extensions and with triple rudders.
The main fuel tank was under the seats supplying a gravity tank on one of the inboard interplane struts. An oil tank of similar size was fitted on the opposite strut. A horn and exhaust silencer were fitted.
The machine flew initially with a 90hp Austro-Daimler on 30 August 1913, piloted by Louis Noel with two passengers, the load was progressively increased when the more powerful engine, acquired from Cody's estate, was fitted in September. The machine was reported to show a great increase in speed with this. Early in November a 100hp Green was fitted to qualify the machine as 'all British', in order to enter the contest for the British Empire Michelin Trophy No. 1. This duly happened, when on 5 November 1913 RH Carr flew the required 300 miles, flying continuously between Hendon and Brooklands, to win the prize.
A further use was made of the Charabanc to carry out the first parachute descent from an aeroplane in Britain on 9 May 1914. The aircraft still retained the Green engine, when exhibited, less wings, at Olympia in March 1914. Only one aircraft was built.
Power:
120hp (Initially 90hp) Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled
100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled with 9ft 6in diameter Lang propeller
Data
Span top 62ft *
Span bottom 43ft 8in
Chord 7ft 6in
Gap 6ft 2in
Area 790 sq ft *
Area tailplane 128 sq ft
Area elevator 39 sq ft
Area rudders 36 sq ft
Length 37ft 6in *
Weight 2,000 lb
Weight five up 3,100lb
Speed 30-55 mph
(Averaged 51mph in Michelin Contest)
*The Aeroplane quoted 62ft 6in, 849 sq ft and 38ft 6in respectively
This was a further J.D. North design for passenger carrying, seating four passengers in wicker seats behind the pilot; it was later reported flying with eleven persons aboard. In appearance it resembled a scaled-up Henry Farman biplane with two and a half bays, top wing extensions and with triple rudders.
The main fuel tank was under the seats supplying a gravity tank on one of the inboard interplane struts. An oil tank of similar size was fitted on the opposite strut. A horn and exhaust silencer were fitted.
The machine flew initially with a 90hp Austro-Daimler on 30 August 1913, piloted by Louis Noel with two passengers, the load was progressively increased when the more powerful engine, acquired from Cody's estate, was fitted in September. The machine was reported to show a great increase in speed with this. Early in November a 100hp Green was fitted to qualify the machine as 'all British', in order to enter the contest for the British Empire Michelin Trophy No. 1. This duly happened, when on 5 November 1913 RH Carr flew the required 300 miles, flying continuously between Hendon and Brooklands, to win the prize.
A further use was made of the Charabanc to carry out the first parachute descent from an aeroplane in Britain on 9 May 1914. The aircraft still retained the Green engine, when exhibited, less wings, at Olympia in March 1914. Only one aircraft was built.
Power:
120hp (Initially 90hp) Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled
100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled with 9ft 6in diameter Lang propeller
Data
Span top 62ft *
Span bottom 43ft 8in
Chord 7ft 6in
Gap 6ft 2in
Area 790 sq ft *
Area tailplane 128 sq ft
Area elevator 39 sq ft
Area rudders 36 sq ft
Length 37ft 6in *
Weight 2,000 lb
Weight five up 3,100lb
Speed 30-55 mph
(Averaged 51mph in Michelin Contest)
*The Aeroplane quoted 62ft 6in, 849 sq ft and 38ft 6in respectively
GW Charabanc of 1913-1914 was designed to carry four passengers but flew with eleven aboard. Fitted with a Green engine.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE Military biplane Type XI
J.D. North designed a new aircraft, which was first seen at Olympia in March 1914, unflown. It was tested at Hendon on 9 May 1914 by Louis Noel, but was reported to be nose heavy, requiring a longer tail and larger tail surfaces. The location of the cockpits for carrying a gun also needed to be reversed. It is believed that the machine was soon abandoned.
The Type XI was a typical pusher biplane of the period, with two bay wings of near equal span. The tail booms tapered in plan and were readily detachable for transport. The rudder was balanced, and a small fin was mounted above the tailplane, which carried divided elevators. Ailerons were fitted to top and bottom wings and were connected by balance cables.
The engine bay was covered by metal cowling panels, cooling being effected by leaving the underside exposed. The engine itself was mounted low down and drove the propeller on a separate shaft mounted above.
Power: 100hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a four-bladed Integrale propeller through chain and sprockets at a reduction of 5:3 approx.
Data
Span top 37ft
Span bottom 35ft
Chord 5ft
Gap 6ft
Length 26ft 6in
Area 358 sq ft *
Area tailplane 26 sq ft
Area rudder 15 sq ft
Area elevators 23 sq ft
Weight 1,000 lb
Weight allup 1,550lb
Speed range 42-80 mph
*The Aeroplane reported 358 sq ft
J.D. North designed a new aircraft, which was first seen at Olympia in March 1914, unflown. It was tested at Hendon on 9 May 1914 by Louis Noel, but was reported to be nose heavy, requiring a longer tail and larger tail surfaces. The location of the cockpits for carrying a gun also needed to be reversed. It is believed that the machine was soon abandoned.
The Type XI was a typical pusher biplane of the period, with two bay wings of near equal span. The tail booms tapered in plan and were readily detachable for transport. The rudder was balanced, and a small fin was mounted above the tailplane, which carried divided elevators. Ailerons were fitted to top and bottom wings and were connected by balance cables.
The engine bay was covered by metal cowling panels, cooling being effected by leaving the underside exposed. The engine itself was mounted low down and drove the propeller on a separate shaft mounted above.
Power: 100hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a four-bladed Integrale propeller through chain and sprockets at a reduction of 5:3 approx.
Data
Span top 37ft
Span bottom 35ft
Chord 5ft
Gap 6ft
Length 26ft 6in
Area 358 sq ft *
Area tailplane 26 sq ft
Area rudder 15 sq ft
Area elevators 23 sq ft
Weight 1,000 lb
Weight allup 1,550lb
Speed range 42-80 mph
*The Aeroplane reported 358 sq ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE 'Circuit of Britain' biplane Type XIII
The Type XIII was entry No.4 for the 1914 contest, canceled by the outbreak of war. It was being tested from Southampton Water late in July, when it capsized, giving J.D. North, its designer flying in the passenger seat, a ducking. The machine was reported to be ready, less engine, after repair in late August, but was then fitted with a wheel undercarriage for testing. It failed to interest either the naval or military authorities as a reconnaissance aircraft.
The fuselage was said to resemble that of a Morane-Saulnier monoplane, owing to the horizontal knife-edge termination at the tail. The rather bulbous engine cowling was cutaway at the lower segment, and faired to a point at the sides of the flat sided fuselage.
The single bay wings were heavily staggered with N type interplane struts, an original feature at the time, and carried ailerons on the top wing only. No tailplane was fitted, only balanced divided elevators, with conventional fin and balanced rudder, the lower portion of which acted as a water rudder, and was cropped when a tail skid was fitted.
The twin wooden floats were short, with a single step and were mounted on a steel tubular chassis. The tail float was streamlined and was made of metal.
Power: 100hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 27ft 10in
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5ft 6in
Floats length 14ft 10in
Floats beam lft 9 l/2in.
Floats depth lft 2in
Area 290 sq ft *
Weight 1,000 lb
Weight allup 1,800lb
Max speed 85 mph
Endurance 5 l/2hr
*The Aeroplane reported 300 sq ft
The Type XIII was entry No.4 for the 1914 contest, canceled by the outbreak of war. It was being tested from Southampton Water late in July, when it capsized, giving J.D. North, its designer flying in the passenger seat, a ducking. The machine was reported to be ready, less engine, after repair in late August, but was then fitted with a wheel undercarriage for testing. It failed to interest either the naval or military authorities as a reconnaissance aircraft.
The fuselage was said to resemble that of a Morane-Saulnier monoplane, owing to the horizontal knife-edge termination at the tail. The rather bulbous engine cowling was cutaway at the lower segment, and faired to a point at the sides of the flat sided fuselage.
The single bay wings were heavily staggered with N type interplane struts, an original feature at the time, and carried ailerons on the top wing only. No tailplane was fitted, only balanced divided elevators, with conventional fin and balanced rudder, the lower portion of which acted as a water rudder, and was cropped when a tail skid was fitted.
The twin wooden floats were short, with a single step and were mounted on a steel tubular chassis. The tail float was streamlined and was made of metal.
Power: 100hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 27ft 10in
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5ft 6in
Floats length 14ft 10in
Floats beam lft 9 l/2in.
Floats depth lft 2in
Area 290 sq ft *
Weight 1,000 lb
Weight allup 1,800lb
Max speed 85 mph
Endurance 5 l/2hr
*The Aeroplane reported 300 sq ft
Grahame-White Scout with Marcus Manton in rear cockpit.
GW Type XIII was later tested with a wheel undercarriage but no production ensued.
GW Type XIII was later tested with a wheel undercarriage but no production ensued.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAHAME-WHITE pusher type biplanes from 1912 leading to Type XV
In 1912-1913, a Boxkite with twin rudders, the bi-rudder 'bus, still with front elevator and exposed crew was used extensively at Hendon. On 27 November 1913, flown by Marcus D. Manton, it was used to demonstrate the use of a Lewis machine gun for firing at ground targets at Bisley. A similar machine to this, RNAS No. 1600, was supplied to the Admiralty early in 1915. This became the prototype for further batches, supplied in wartime to the RNAS and later to the RFC, to a total of 135 aircraft.
The early deliveries were fitted with a front elevator, which was discarded at some stage, and a nacelle for pilot and passenger, with full dual controls, was fitted. The top wings could be fitted with extensions, and the ailerons were fitted with balance cables. A variety of engines was fitted, including the 60hp Le Rhone, the 70 and 80hp Gnome air-cooled rotaries and the 60hp Green water-cooled type.
Despite the considerable differences between the early and later types, still being delivered in 1917, these aircraft were generally known as the Type XV.
In 1912-1913, a Boxkite with twin rudders, the bi-rudder 'bus, still with front elevator and exposed crew was used extensively at Hendon. On 27 November 1913, flown by Marcus D. Manton, it was used to demonstrate the use of a Lewis machine gun for firing at ground targets at Bisley. A similar machine to this, RNAS No. 1600, was supplied to the Admiralty early in 1915. This became the prototype for further batches, supplied in wartime to the RNAS and later to the RFC, to a total of 135 aircraft.
The early deliveries were fitted with a front elevator, which was discarded at some stage, and a nacelle for pilot and passenger, with full dual controls, was fitted. The top wings could be fitted with extensions, and the ailerons were fitted with balance cables. A variety of engines was fitted, including the 60hp Le Rhone, the 70 and 80hp Gnome air-cooled rotaries and the 60hp Green water-cooled type.
Despite the considerable differences between the early and later types, still being delivered in 1917, these aircraft were generally known as the Type XV.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRATZE monoplane (Eugene V. Gratze Ltd., 446 Whitfield St., London Wl)
This machine, originally known as the 'Dirigoplane', was taken to the Blackpool Meeting in October 1909. It did not fly, as the wings had been lost in transit, and temporary wings made there were unsuitable.
The system of control was unusual and complicated, involving the use of three hand wheels and a pedal. One wheel operated a tail elevator and the incidence of the wings; the second operated the rudder portion of the cruciform tail together with horizontal movement of the propeller axis, which was mounted on a universally jointed shaft; the third wheel enabled the sweep angle of the wings to be changed, together with the upward alignment of the propeller. The foot pedal was to move the flexible wing tips upwards, in unison, with the object of increasing the dihedral angle to improve stability.
During the winter months, changes were made to the machine, which was at Canewdon, near Southend, in the middle of May 1910, where it was christened 'Daisy' in the traditional manner. The alterations included the addition of a shortspan plane, above the center section, the center portion of which served as an elevator. This operated in conjunction with flaps on the leading edges, near the wing tips, which could be raised vertically. A larger cruciform tail unit was fitted, and the rounded ends of the wings squared off. It is not clear how much of the original control system was retained, but presumably the flexible wing tips were no longer used. Although perhaps 'flown' in November 1909, no further reports of flight were published. Finally, in November 1911, the machine, which had cost the owner ?800, was advertised for sale at ?80.
Power: 40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data
Span 40ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Length 28ft 6in
This machine, originally known as the 'Dirigoplane', was taken to the Blackpool Meeting in October 1909. It did not fly, as the wings had been lost in transit, and temporary wings made there were unsuitable.
The system of control was unusual and complicated, involving the use of three hand wheels and a pedal. One wheel operated a tail elevator and the incidence of the wings; the second operated the rudder portion of the cruciform tail together with horizontal movement of the propeller axis, which was mounted on a universally jointed shaft; the third wheel enabled the sweep angle of the wings to be changed, together with the upward alignment of the propeller. The foot pedal was to move the flexible wing tips upwards, in unison, with the object of increasing the dihedral angle to improve stability.
During the winter months, changes were made to the machine, which was at Canewdon, near Southend, in the middle of May 1910, where it was christened 'Daisy' in the traditional manner. The alterations included the addition of a shortspan plane, above the center section, the center portion of which served as an elevator. This operated in conjunction with flaps on the leading edges, near the wing tips, which could be raised vertically. A larger cruciform tail unit was fitted, and the rounded ends of the wings squared off. It is not clear how much of the original control system was retained, but presumably the flexible wing tips were no longer used. Although perhaps 'flown' in November 1909, no further reports of flight were published. Finally, in November 1911, the machine, which had cost the owner ?800, was advertised for sale at ?80.
Power: 40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data
Span 40ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Length 28ft 6in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GRAY monoplane (William Edrington Gray and E.L. Gray, Lake District area)
The brothers were reported to have built a monoplane in 1910-1911 and a biplane with Humber engine in 1914-1915. There is some confusion, for W.E. Gray recorded in 1966, details of a monoplane built and flown in March 1917; presumably this should be 1911.
The layout was of a conventional tractor monoplane, which was mainly constructed of yellow pine, with corner blocks glued and wrapped with glued fabric. The elevator and rudder were made of steel tube.
The fuselage was fully covered with fabric, and terminated with a tail unit with small triangular fixed surfaces on either side, to which was hinged a large one piece elevator. The shield-shaped rudder pivoted on a post above the fuselage and was provided with a large balance area. Roll control was by ailerons. The undercarriage consisted of separate half-axles pivoted on inverted vees and a central skid.
There is no information on the biplane, which was probably not completed after the outbreak of war.
Power: 35hp Humber three-cylinder air-cooled fan-type radial (referred to as from the Windermere monoplane) driving a Chauviere propeller
Data
Span 32ft
Length 21ft 6in
Area 189sqft
Area tailplane 10 sq ft
Area elevator 23 sq ft
Weight 650 lb
Weight allup 800 lb
Speed 35-40 mph
Materials cost ? 50
The brothers were reported to have built a monoplane in 1910-1911 and a biplane with Humber engine in 1914-1915. There is some confusion, for W.E. Gray recorded in 1966, details of a monoplane built and flown in March 1917; presumably this should be 1911.
The layout was of a conventional tractor monoplane, which was mainly constructed of yellow pine, with corner blocks glued and wrapped with glued fabric. The elevator and rudder were made of steel tube.
The fuselage was fully covered with fabric, and terminated with a tail unit with small triangular fixed surfaces on either side, to which was hinged a large one piece elevator. The shield-shaped rudder pivoted on a post above the fuselage and was provided with a large balance area. Roll control was by ailerons. The undercarriage consisted of separate half-axles pivoted on inverted vees and a central skid.
There is no information on the biplane, which was probably not completed after the outbreak of war.
Power: 35hp Humber three-cylinder air-cooled fan-type radial (referred to as from the Windermere monoplane) driving a Chauviere propeller
Data
Span 32ft
Length 21ft 6in
Area 189sqft
Area tailplane 10 sq ft
Area elevator 23 sq ft
Weight 650 lb
Weight allup 800 lb
Speed 35-40 mph
Materials cost ? 50
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GROHMANN monoplane (Alfred Grohmann, Laurel Bank Terrace, Feniscowles, near Blackburn, Lancashire)
Grohmann was a carpenter of German origin working in Lancashire, who built a man-powered machine mounted on a lady's bicycle in 1910. This was made to test the wings and controls, before being rebuilt as a powered machine, of which no more was heard. A 4ft 6in diameter tractor propeller was driven through chain and bevel gearing.
Data
Span 24ft
Area 36 sq ft
Area of elevator 9 sq ft
Weight 100 lb
Grohmann was a carpenter of German origin working in Lancashire, who built a man-powered machine mounted on a lady's bicycle in 1910. This was made to test the wings and controls, before being rebuilt as a powered machine, of which no more was heard. A 4ft 6in diameter tractor propeller was driven through chain and bevel gearing.
Data
Span 24ft
Area 36 sq ft
Area of elevator 9 sq ft
Weight 100 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GROOMBRIDGE & SOUTH multiplane (C. Groombridge and W.A. South)
This large aeroplane had two tiers of five wings fore and aft and six propellers carried three on either side of the connecting framework. A seventh screw was mounted on top of the whole structure.
Two 20hp engines were fitted and these drove the propellers via a central main shaft. The propellers were vanes which worked in the manner of oars with a driving stroke in the vertical position and a return stroke with the blades feathered.
The machine was fitted with four road wheels linked to the engine so that a speed of 20 mph could be attained before the propelling vanes were brought into use.
The photograph shows a full size mockup made of wood in 1903 and was rather heavy; the final version would have been built of lighter materials. Patent Nos. 13241 1900 and 25723 of 1902 refer.
Data
Span 60ft
Length 80ft
This large aeroplane had two tiers of five wings fore and aft and six propellers carried three on either side of the connecting framework. A seventh screw was mounted on top of the whole structure.
Two 20hp engines were fitted and these drove the propellers via a central main shaft. The propellers were vanes which worked in the manner of oars with a driving stroke in the vertical position and a return stroke with the blades feathered.
The machine was fitted with four road wheels linked to the engine so that a speed of 20 mph could be attained before the propelling vanes were brought into use.
The photograph shows a full size mockup made of wood in 1903 and was rather heavy; the final version would have been built of lighter materials. Patent Nos. 13241 1900 and 25723 of 1902 refer.
Data
Span 60ft
Length 80ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GROSE and FEARY monoplane (A.M. Grose and N.A. Feary, Oaklngton, Cambridgeshire)
Construction of the tractor monoplane, designed by the partners, was carried out at the works of the Windham Detachable Motor Body Co., at Clapham Junction, London, SW11. It was ready for testing at Oakington in April 1910, but appears not to have flown.
The machine had a triangular section fuselage with sprung undercarriage, and was of conventional layout. The wings could be adjusted for incidence, which may have been related to the 'patented stability device'. The long chord, shortspan ailerons hung from the rear spars and were unbalanced.
Power: 25hp Advance four-cylinder air-cooled vee
Data
Span 26ft
Length 25ft
Area 160sqft
Construction of the tractor monoplane, designed by the partners, was carried out at the works of the Windham Detachable Motor Body Co., at Clapham Junction, London, SW11. It was ready for testing at Oakington in April 1910, but appears not to have flown.
The machine had a triangular section fuselage with sprung undercarriage, and was of conventional layout. The wings could be adjusted for incidence, which may have been related to the 'patented stability device'. The long chord, shortspan ailerons hung from the rear spars and were unbalanced.
Power: 25hp Advance four-cylinder air-cooled vee
Data
Span 26ft
Length 25ft
Area 160sqft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GROVE glider (Arthur T.M. Grove, Haslemere, Surrey)
This was a biplane glider with front elevator and rear rudder, and was mounted on a two wheel undercarriage. It was built in 1909, but was smashed before flight at Henley-on-Thames, by a gust of wind. A reference of July 1909 gave slightly different details to those below and stated that a 25-32hp Antoinette motor was to be fitted later with the engine and pilot side by side. The biplane was taken to Shellbeach for testing in September 1909. Grove stated in January 1910 that he had begun construction of a monoplane glider, of which nothing further was heard.
Data
Span 25ft
Chord 4ft 9in*
Gap 6ft *
Length 22 ft
Area 119 sq ft
Area front elevator 18 sq ft
Area rudder 12 sq ft *
Weight 500 lb
*Also reported as 4ft 6in, 6ft lin and 9 sq ft respectively
This was a biplane glider with front elevator and rear rudder, and was mounted on a two wheel undercarriage. It was built in 1909, but was smashed before flight at Henley-on-Thames, by a gust of wind. A reference of July 1909 gave slightly different details to those below and stated that a 25-32hp Antoinette motor was to be fitted later with the engine and pilot side by side. The biplane was taken to Shellbeach for testing in September 1909. Grove stated in January 1910 that he had begun construction of a monoplane glider, of which nothing further was heard.
Data
Span 25ft
Chord 4ft 9in*
Gap 6ft *
Length 22 ft
Area 119 sq ft
Area front elevator 18 sq ft
Area rudder 12 sq ft *
Weight 500 lb
*Also reported as 4ft 6in, 6ft lin and 9 sq ft respectively
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
GUILLOU & CLOUZY biplane (Henri Guillou, or Guillon, de Puirajou, Epsom, Surrey)
Attempts to fly this machine were made by Frenchman, M. Guillou, on Epsom Downs on 11 April 1907, without success, although the claim was made that it was 'just lifting' at 20 mph, and more power was needed.
The machine had a tricycle frame, on which the pilot lay prone, and to which was attached the two bay wing structure, made of bamboo with calico covering. A triangular front elevator protruded from the top wing and there was a fixed tailplane.
A 20hp Buchet four-cylinder engine was mounted low in the frame, and drove a 5ft diameter, broad bladed propeller by chain. The 370 lb weight of the machine was deemed to be excessive.
Attempts to fly this machine were made by Frenchman, M. Guillou, on Epsom Downs on 11 April 1907, without success, although the claim was made that it was 'just lifting' at 20 mph, and more power was needed.
The machine had a tricycle frame, on which the pilot lay prone, and to which was attached the two bay wing structure, made of bamboo with calico covering. A triangular front elevator protruded from the top wing and there was a fixed tailplane.
A 20hp Buchet four-cylinder engine was mounted low in the frame, and drove a 5ft diameter, broad bladed propeller by chain. The 370 lb weight of the machine was deemed to be excessive.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HALL biplanes (Hall Aviation Co., London Aerodrome, Hendon)
J.L. Hall operated a flying school at Hendon from 1913, using a variety of machines, Avro, Bleriot, Deperdussin and Caudron. In 1914 the company began the manufacture of Caudron machines, of both single and two-seater types, the latter with dual control. These were powered by 35hp and 45hp Anzani engines.
One machine used Caudron wings, but with a fuselage, instead of a nacelle and was powered by a 50hp Gnome. It was commenced in 1914 and eventually flew in June 1915 and continued in use as No.6 of a large fleet of training machines of Caudron type, operated until 1918. It was assembled in Hall's shed, but was built by another company, possibly Ruffy-Baumann.
J.L. Hall operated a flying school at Hendon from 1913, using a variety of machines, Avro, Bleriot, Deperdussin and Caudron. In 1914 the company began the manufacture of Caudron machines, of both single and two-seater types, the latter with dual control. These were powered by 35hp and 45hp Anzani engines.
One machine used Caudron wings, but with a fuselage, instead of a nacelle and was powered by a 50hp Gnome. It was commenced in 1914 and eventually flew in June 1915 and continued in use as No.6 of a large fleet of training machines of Caudron type, operated until 1918. It was assembled in Hall's shed, but was built by another company, possibly Ruffy-Baumann.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HAMBLE hydrobiplane HL.l (Hamble River, Luke & Co., Hamble, Hampshire)
Constructed by an established boat building company, to the design of Frank Murphy, late of Bristol, the machine was shown incomplete at Olympia in March 1914. Changes were made later and the machine was tested by Gordon England, but costs were excessive, and the machine and the premises were put up for sale by July 1914.
The aircraft was a large two-seater pusher seaplane with twin wooden main floats and twin metal tail floats, moving with the rudders. There were four pairs of interplane struts each side, with radiators mounted on the innermost pairs. Ailerons were fitted to both top and bottom wings, the latter having pronounced dihedral.
The spruce tail booms, to be replaced by steel tubes later, extended aft from the second interplane struts. The tailplane and elevator were carried on the top booms, the pair of rudders pivoting on posts below. The pointed nose nacelle, was covered with two layers of cedar, laid up diagonally over the structure, and was mounted on short struts between the wings. The main floats were of similar construction, but rendered watertight, and were mounted on a steel tube chassis, intended to be sprung later.
Power: 150hp NAG (British-made) six-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a Normale pusher propeller direct.
Data
Span top 60ft
Span bottom 53ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft
Length 30ft
Area 678 sq ft
Area tailplane 39 sq ft
Area elevator 33 sq ft
Area rudders 32 sq ft
Weight 1,300lb
Weight allup 2,550 lb
Speed range 32-65mph
Endurance 5hr
Constructed by an established boat building company, to the design of Frank Murphy, late of Bristol, the machine was shown incomplete at Olympia in March 1914. Changes were made later and the machine was tested by Gordon England, but costs were excessive, and the machine and the premises were put up for sale by July 1914.
The aircraft was a large two-seater pusher seaplane with twin wooden main floats and twin metal tail floats, moving with the rudders. There were four pairs of interplane struts each side, with radiators mounted on the innermost pairs. Ailerons were fitted to both top and bottom wings, the latter having pronounced dihedral.
The spruce tail booms, to be replaced by steel tubes later, extended aft from the second interplane struts. The tailplane and elevator were carried on the top booms, the pair of rudders pivoting on posts below. The pointed nose nacelle, was covered with two layers of cedar, laid up diagonally over the structure, and was mounted on short struts between the wings. The main floats were of similar construction, but rendered watertight, and were mounted on a steel tube chassis, intended to be sprung later.
Power: 150hp NAG (British-made) six-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a Normale pusher propeller direct.
Data
Span top 60ft
Span bottom 53ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft
Length 30ft
Area 678 sq ft
Area tailplane 39 sq ft
Area elevator 33 sq ft
Area rudders 32 sq ft
Weight 1,300lb
Weight allup 2,550 lb
Speed range 32-65mph
Endurance 5hr
Hamble HL1 hydro-biplane at Olympia in March 1914 was abandoned when the company was liquidated later in the year.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HAMMANT direct lift machine (William Hammant, London)
A design with two long revolving paddles was patented by Hammant, and was illustrated in The Aero of 29 March 1910. Slots in the paddles were opened and closed by cams, as they revolved. Experiments and model tests carried out by Braun and Co., Pentonville Road, North London were reported to be very satisfactory.
A design with two long revolving paddles was patented by Hammant, and was illustrated in The Aero of 29 March 1910. Slots in the paddles were opened and closed by cams, as they revolved. Experiments and model tests carried out by Braun and Co., Pentonville Road, North London were reported to be very satisfactory.
Hammant. This ambitious scheme for a direct-lift machine was tested in model form only after being patented in 1908.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HAMMOND biplane (E.V. Hammond, 88 Louisville Rd., Balham, London SW)
Hammond earned out experiments with helicopter rigs in 1906-1908, but came to the conclusion that the power required for vertical lift was not available at that time. He then turned to the construction of a pusher biplane at Brooklands, which made its appearance at some time in 1909. He later claimed to be the sole experimenter at Brooklands throughout the spring, summer and autumn of 1909.
The rather crude looking single-seater, pusher biplane was not reported upon in the Press at the time, but a surviving photograph shows the general configuration. Unusual features were the large interplane ailerons and the double boxkite-like rudder, which seemed to be carried on swinging tail booms.
The machine was presumably abandoned after the trials, which were of limited success, although Hammond was among the first dozen British pilots to get off the ground in a British-built machine.
Hammond earned out experiments with helicopter rigs in 1906-1908, but came to the conclusion that the power required for vertical lift was not available at that time. He then turned to the construction of a pusher biplane at Brooklands, which made its appearance at some time in 1909. He later claimed to be the sole experimenter at Brooklands throughout the spring, summer and autumn of 1909.
The rather crude looking single-seater, pusher biplane was not reported upon in the Press at the time, but a surviving photograph shows the general configuration. Unusual features were the large interplane ailerons and the double boxkite-like rudder, which seemed to be carried on swinging tail booms.
The machine was presumably abandoned after the trials, which were of limited success, although Hammond was among the first dozen British pilots to get off the ground in a British-built machine.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HAMMOND triplane
The successor to the biplane appeared at Brooklands for engine testing at the beginning of January 1911. Its general construction was reported to be flimsy and the commentators of the time were doubtful of its potential. On the 14 January 1911 it was taxied at speeds up to 10 mph by Howard Pixton but, although further brief appearances were made, it was presumably abandoned soon after. Hammond claimed that it made several short flights with a 14hp engine but that it was underpowered.
The layout was similar to other types, usually biplanes, of the period but, unusually, it was a twin tractor with belt drive to the propellers, and the pilot behind the engine. Lateral control was achieved by means of unbalanced ailerons on the top plane. The machine was mounted on a four wheeled chassis, with skids under the wing tips to aid balance on the ground. No further details of the machine are recorded.
The successor to the biplane appeared at Brooklands for engine testing at the beginning of January 1911. Its general construction was reported to be flimsy and the commentators of the time were doubtful of its potential. On the 14 January 1911 it was taxied at speeds up to 10 mph by Howard Pixton but, although further brief appearances were made, it was presumably abandoned soon after. Hammond claimed that it made several short flights with a 14hp engine but that it was underpowered.
The layout was similar to other types, usually biplanes, of the period but, unusually, it was a twin tractor with belt drive to the propellers, and the pilot behind the engine. Lateral control was achieved by means of unbalanced ailerons on the top plane. The machine was mounted on a four wheeled chassis, with skids under the wing tips to aid balance on the ground. No further details of the machine are recorded.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HAMMOND monoplane
A single-seater tractor monoplane was built by Hammond at Brooklands in Shed No.2 during the summer of 1913. It was a simple design with two parallel steel tubes forming the fuselage. The engine was a 30hp Advance four-cylinder water-cooled vee type, already an old type, probably used in his earlier machines. The wing was based on a single spar made of 2 l/2in diameter by 22swg steel tube.
A single-seater tractor monoplane was built by Hammond at Brooklands in Shed No.2 during the summer of 1913. It was a simple design with two parallel steel tubes forming the fuselage. The engine was a 30hp Advance four-cylinder water-cooled vee type, already an old type, probably used in his earlier machines. The wing was based on a single spar made of 2 l/2in diameter by 22swg steel tube.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HAMPSHIRE AERO CLUB glider
Patrick Y. Alexander, who had devoted his time and fortune to the advancement of aeronautics since about 1890, was the president of this club. Among his previous work was support for the United Services College (later the Imperial Service College) at Windsor where, in 1909-1910, he encouraged the making of models by the students, leading to a full size glider. It was this machine that he transferred to Gosport for the use of the Hampshire club.
The glider consisted of a braced biplane structure with four pairs of interplane struts each side and no other stabilizing or control surfaces. The operator stood on the front spar of the lower wing and was towed into a suitable breeze by the helpers on the ground. Some degree of control may have been possible by weight shift by the operator.
The glider was first flown at Fort Grange, Gosport in April 1910 and also later that year.
Patrick Y. Alexander, who had devoted his time and fortune to the advancement of aeronautics since about 1890, was the president of this club. Among his previous work was support for the United Services College (later the Imperial Service College) at Windsor where, in 1909-1910, he encouraged the making of models by the students, leading to a full size glider. It was this machine that he transferred to Gosport for the use of the Hampshire club.
The glider consisted of a braced biplane structure with four pairs of interplane struts each side and no other stabilizing or control surfaces. The operator stood on the front spar of the lower wing and was towed into a suitable breeze by the helpers on the ground. Some degree of control may have been possible by weight shift by the operator.
The glider was first flown at Fort Grange, Gosport in April 1910 and also later that year.
Hampshire Aero Club glider resulted from work carried out at the United Services College at Windsor sponsored by P.Y. Alexander.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HANDLEY PAGE glider (Frederick Handley Page, Creekmouth, Barking, Essex)
Handley Page, who later became famous as the major manufacturer of large aircraft, experimented with flapping wing models, but became actively interested in fixed wings in 1906-1907. He became acquainted with Jose Weiss in 1908, through the Aeronautical Society, thereafter making use of the Weiss patented wing form, with curved leading edge and flexible tips, in a number of his own designs.
The first of these was a glider, with both main wing and foreplane of Weiss shape, mounted on a tricycle chassis, which earned the seated pilot. The attempts to fly from slopes at Barking Creek in 1909 were unsuccessful. The glider was reported sold to a Mr. Rodez.
Handley Page, who later became famous as the major manufacturer of large aircraft, experimented with flapping wing models, but became actively interested in fixed wings in 1906-1907. He became acquainted with Jose Weiss in 1908, through the Aeronautical Society, thereafter making use of the Weiss patented wing form, with curved leading edge and flexible tips, in a number of his own designs.
The first of these was a glider, with both main wing and foreplane of Weiss shape, mounted on a tricycle chassis, which earned the seated pilot. The attempts to fly from slopes at Barking Creek in 1909 were unsuccessful. The glider was reported sold to a Mr. Rodez.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HANDLEY PAGE monoplane Type A. HP.l. (Handley Page Ltd., Barking)
A small tractor monoplane, named 'Bluebird', with Weiss type wing, was shown incomplete at Olympia in March 1910, priced at ?375. The machine left the ground after the undercarriage had been moved forward, and a small tailplane was added. The flight took place on 26 May 1910 but the aircraft was damaged by side-slipping due to lack of lateral control.
Power: 20-25hp Advance four-cylinder, air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 6in HP propeller
Data
Span 32ft 6in
Chord 6ft
Length 20ft 6in
Area 150 sq ft
Weight 300 lb
Weight allup 4501b
Speed 35 mph
Price ?375
HANDLEY PAGE monoplane Type C. HP.3
This was a reconstruction of the Type A, carried out in 1910. Wing warping was introduced together with a large rudder which was still of cruciform type on a universal mounting. A twin strut pylon replaced the single kingpost of the original. A 25hp Alvaston water-cooled engine, with a radiator mounted edge on and to one side, was fitted, but this was of insufficient power and was replaced by a 50hp Isaacson radial.
The Type C was abandoned in favor of the Type D and was transferred to the Northampton Polytechnic Institute as an instructional airframe.
Power:
25hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled
50hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span 30ft
Length 21ft
Area 150 sq ft
Weight 250 lb
Weight allup 4501b
Speed 35mph
A small tractor monoplane, named 'Bluebird', with Weiss type wing, was shown incomplete at Olympia in March 1910, priced at ?375. The machine left the ground after the undercarriage had been moved forward, and a small tailplane was added. The flight took place on 26 May 1910 but the aircraft was damaged by side-slipping due to lack of lateral control.
Power: 20-25hp Advance four-cylinder, air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 6in HP propeller
Data
Span 32ft 6in
Chord 6ft
Length 20ft 6in
Area 150 sq ft
Weight 300 lb
Weight allup 4501b
Speed 35 mph
Price ?375
HANDLEY PAGE monoplane Type C. HP.3
This was a reconstruction of the Type A, carried out in 1910. Wing warping was introduced together with a large rudder which was still of cruciform type on a universal mounting. A twin strut pylon replaced the single kingpost of the original. A 25hp Alvaston water-cooled engine, with a radiator mounted edge on and to one side, was fitted, but this was of insufficient power and was replaced by a 50hp Isaacson radial.
The Type C was abandoned in favor of the Type D and was transferred to the Northampton Polytechnic Institute as an instructional airframe.
Power:
25hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled
50hp Isaacson seven-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span 30ft
Length 21ft
Area 150 sq ft
Weight 250 lb
Weight allup 4501b
Speed 35mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HANDLEY PAGE biplane Type B. HP.2
This machine was built at Barking in 1910 for WP Thompson of Planes Ltd., Freshfield, but sustained damage on trial and was further wrecked, when the shed, in which it was housed, collapsed in a gale. It was subsequently rebuilt as the Planes biplane (q.v.).
PLANES biplane (Planes Ltd., Shed No.l, Freshfield, Lancashire)
This machine was made originally by Handley Page at Barking to the basic ideas of W.P. Thompson, a patent agent of Liverpool. The main principle was to concentrate the weight below the wings, to provide 'pendulum stability'. Thompson's original type of tubular construction was heavy and was discarded in favor of wood and fabric. Much of the work at Barking was carried out by R.C. Fenwick, an assistant of Thompson's.
The machine was tested on the rough ground at Barking in October 1909 and damage to the undercarriage resulted. Immediately afterwards, the shed in which it was housed collapsed in a gale, causing further damage. Thereafter the machine was rebuilt at Barking by Fenwick and, although previously known as the Handley Page type B, it now became the Planes biplane. It was delivered by rail to Freshfield in about September 1910, without being tested further. Fenwick taught himself to fly on it, receiving Aviators Certificate No.39 on 29 November 1910. Within a week it was badly damaged on takeoff, in a crash caused by the downwash from a Farman flown by Compton Paterson, flying low overhead. However the machine was repaired and continued in use.
This large biplane was converted from the chain driven, twin pusher type, of the Handley Page type B, to a single pusher propeller. The tail booms were raked downwards to carry a biplane elevator and twin rudders, below the level of the bottom wing. The undercarriage consisted of a pair of main landing wheels and skids, positioned on either side of the pilot, with a pair of nose wheels added to deal with any tendency for the nose to dig in. In addition there were small wheels on long supports at the wingtips and a tail skid. Ailerons replaced warping of the upper wing tips.
This machine was built at Barking in 1910 for WP Thompson of Planes Ltd., Freshfield, but sustained damage on trial and was further wrecked, when the shed, in which it was housed, collapsed in a gale. It was subsequently rebuilt as the Planes biplane (q.v.).
PLANES biplane (Planes Ltd., Shed No.l, Freshfield, Lancashire)
This machine was made originally by Handley Page at Barking to the basic ideas of W.P. Thompson, a patent agent of Liverpool. The main principle was to concentrate the weight below the wings, to provide 'pendulum stability'. Thompson's original type of tubular construction was heavy and was discarded in favor of wood and fabric. Much of the work at Barking was carried out by R.C. Fenwick, an assistant of Thompson's.
The machine was tested on the rough ground at Barking in October 1909 and damage to the undercarriage resulted. Immediately afterwards, the shed in which it was housed collapsed in a gale, causing further damage. Thereafter the machine was rebuilt at Barking by Fenwick and, although previously known as the Handley Page type B, it now became the Planes biplane. It was delivered by rail to Freshfield in about September 1910, without being tested further. Fenwick taught himself to fly on it, receiving Aviators Certificate No.39 on 29 November 1910. Within a week it was badly damaged on takeoff, in a crash caused by the downwash from a Farman flown by Compton Paterson, flying low overhead. However the machine was repaired and continued in use.
This large biplane was converted from the chain driven, twin pusher type, of the Handley Page type B, to a single pusher propeller. The tail booms were raked downwards to carry a biplane elevator and twin rudders, below the level of the bottom wing. The undercarriage consisted of a pair of main landing wheels and skids, positioned on either side of the pilot, with a pair of nose wheels added to deal with any tendency for the nose to dig in. In addition there were small wheels on long supports at the wingtips and a tail skid. Ailerons replaced warping of the upper wing tips.
Planes biplane was modified from the Handley Page Type B (HP2) to a single pusher propeller at Freshfield in 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HANDLEY PAGE monoplane Type D. HP.4
The Type D single-seater was shown at Olympia in March 1911, priced at ?450, but remained unsold. It was fitted with a 35hp Green engine, with radiators each side of the fuselage. The engine was on loan and was to be replaced by the Isaacson radial from the Type C, after the lack of success at the show.
The machine at Olympia had a monocoque fuselage, long skids, warping wings, a rudder with fixed fin below the large elevator and a small fixed tailplane. When it came to fit the radial engine, it was found impractical to mount it on the monocoque fuselage, which was replaced on a second machine with a new girder type, fabric covered fuselage.
The aircraft was due to fly in the Circuit of Britain Contest to be held on 22 July 1911, with R.C. Fenwick, who also contributed to the design, as pilot. Unfortunately he crashed the machine on its first flight on 15 July 1911 and was immediately dismissed by Handley Page. As a result of this, the second machine was not ready in time to compete in the Contest, being flown later by Edward Petre at Fairlop in Essex. The color of its new doping scheme caused it to receive the nicknames 'Yellow Peril' and 'Antiseptic'.
Power:
35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled
50hp Isaacson five-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 6ft
Length 22ft
Area 156 sq ft
Weight 420 lb
The Type D single-seater was shown at Olympia in March 1911, priced at ?450, but remained unsold. It was fitted with a 35hp Green engine, with radiators each side of the fuselage. The engine was on loan and was to be replaced by the Isaacson radial from the Type C, after the lack of success at the show.
The machine at Olympia had a monocoque fuselage, long skids, warping wings, a rudder with fixed fin below the large elevator and a small fixed tailplane. When it came to fit the radial engine, it was found impractical to mount it on the monocoque fuselage, which was replaced on a second machine with a new girder type, fabric covered fuselage.
The aircraft was due to fly in the Circuit of Britain Contest to be held on 22 July 1911, with R.C. Fenwick, who also contributed to the design, as pilot. Unfortunately he crashed the machine on its first flight on 15 July 1911 and was immediately dismissed by Handley Page. As a result of this, the second machine was not ready in time to compete in the Contest, being flown later by Edward Petre at Fairlop in Essex. The color of its new doping scheme caused it to receive the nicknames 'Yellow Peril' and 'Antiseptic'.
Power:
35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled
50hp Isaacson five-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 6ft
Length 22ft
Area 156 sq ft
Weight 420 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HANDLEY PAGE monoplane Type E. HP.5. Also identified as E/50. (Handley Page Ltd. Barking & Cricklewood)
The Type E was flown on 26 April 1912 at Fairlop, by Edward Petre, for the first time and was the first successful Handley Page aircraft, although it was damaged when landing on the rough ground when it returned to the factory at Barking in June. On the 27 July 1912 Petre flew the 55 miles from Fairlop to Brooklands along the Thames, the first such flight across London. The aircraft remained at Brooklands during August, while the factory was moved from Barking to Cricklewood, and then moved to Hendon. Modifications were made, and a further flight took place on 1 February 1913 by Sydney Pickles, the machine then going on exhibition at Olympia from 14 February 1913.
The Type E retained the Weiss type crescent wing, braced to fuselage-mounted pylons and kingposts towards the tips, which were flexible for warping, although ailerons were fitted later. The fuselage was a shallow, braced girder, tapering to a vertical post at the rear, with a deep fairing below and decking above, built up with formers and stringers and was fabric covered. The tail unit consisted of a long tapered tailplane with semicircular elevators, a fin of low, parallel shape and a tall curved rudder. The central skid, split axle undercarriage embodied spring loaded struts with rubber cord shock absorbers; the tail was supported by a tall springy skid below the rudder post.
The pilot flew the aircraft from the front cockpit and was protected by a cowl covering the upper half of the engine. The aircraft was well constructed and smartly finished, with a blue fuselage and yellow wings and tail, and again became known as the 'Yellow Peril'.
During repairs in early 1913, the fin was changed to a more elegant one of triangular shape. In 1914, before the aircraft was sold to the Beatty School of Flying, it was converted to a single-seater, with twin skid, cross axle undercarriage. However the machine was requisitioned by the War Office, who retained the engine, returning the airframe to Handley Page, where it remained until disposed of in 1940.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 3in diameter HP propeller
Data
Span 42ft 6in
Chord 7ft 8in max
Length 27ft 6in (27ft single-seater)
Area 220 sq ft
Area tailplane 32 sq ft
Area elevators 18 sq ft
Area rudder 12 sq ft
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,300lb
Speed 60mph
Endurance 3hr
Price ?850
The Type E was flown on 26 April 1912 at Fairlop, by Edward Petre, for the first time and was the first successful Handley Page aircraft, although it was damaged when landing on the rough ground when it returned to the factory at Barking in June. On the 27 July 1912 Petre flew the 55 miles from Fairlop to Brooklands along the Thames, the first such flight across London. The aircraft remained at Brooklands during August, while the factory was moved from Barking to Cricklewood, and then moved to Hendon. Modifications were made, and a further flight took place on 1 February 1913 by Sydney Pickles, the machine then going on exhibition at Olympia from 14 February 1913.
The Type E retained the Weiss type crescent wing, braced to fuselage-mounted pylons and kingposts towards the tips, which were flexible for warping, although ailerons were fitted later. The fuselage was a shallow, braced girder, tapering to a vertical post at the rear, with a deep fairing below and decking above, built up with formers and stringers and was fabric covered. The tail unit consisted of a long tapered tailplane with semicircular elevators, a fin of low, parallel shape and a tall curved rudder. The central skid, split axle undercarriage embodied spring loaded struts with rubber cord shock absorbers; the tail was supported by a tall springy skid below the rudder post.
The pilot flew the aircraft from the front cockpit and was protected by a cowl covering the upper half of the engine. The aircraft was well constructed and smartly finished, with a blue fuselage and yellow wings and tail, and again became known as the 'Yellow Peril'.
During repairs in early 1913, the fin was changed to a more elegant one of triangular shape. In 1914, before the aircraft was sold to the Beatty School of Flying, it was converted to a single-seater, with twin skid, cross axle undercarriage. However the machine was requisitioned by the War Office, who retained the engine, returning the airframe to Handley Page, where it remained until disposed of in 1940.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 3in diameter HP propeller
Data
Span 42ft 6in
Chord 7ft 8in max
Length 27ft 6in (27ft single-seater)
Area 220 sq ft
Area tailplane 32 sq ft
Area elevators 18 sq ft
Area rudder 12 sq ft
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,300lb
Speed 60mph
Endurance 3hr
Price ?850
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HANDLEY PAGE monoplane Type F. HP.6. Also identified as F/70
Alongside the Type E, a second monoplane was designed for the Military Trials, for which the previous machine was unsuitable, and was entered as No.28. Handley Page outlined the design to meet the specification, and Henry Petre prepared the drawings and was nominated as pilot. A crescent wing was to be used, which Henry Petre distrusted from experience of flying the Type E, which was unstable laterally in level flight, and he produced drawings for an alternative pair of straight wings, which were made without authority. These were fitted for the first flight at Barking, where the machine was built, but were removed when the machine was dismantled for dispatch to Larkhill, without being seen by Handley Page. Henry Petre refused to fly the machine with crescent wings and it was taken over by his brother Edward who flew it for the first time on 21 August 1912 in this form. Its performance at Larkhill was dogged by engine trouble, which eventually caused a forced landing and damage. The machine was withdrawn and taken to Hendon for repair and flew again on 9 November 1912, this time with Wilfred Parke as pilot. He was flying from Hendon to Oxford on 15 December 1912 with HP's manager, A. Arkell Hardwick as passenger, when the machine crashed at Wembley and both men were killed. It was not rebuilt.
The deep crescent wing, similar to the that of the previous Type E with warping control, was retained after the first flight, but was braced to a single point on a pylon above the fuselage. The pylon consisted of two hinged vee-struts which could be folded down for transport.
The fuselage was deep and flat sided, with curved top and bottom fairings, and seated two side by side. The observer, on the port side, was provided with a transparent panel also serving as an entry hatch. A center skid undercarriage, with divided axle and spring struts, was intended to support the tail also but was supplemented with a tail support of rattan cane There was no fin, but a large semicircular tailplane, divided elevator and balanced rudder with scalloped edges constituted the tail unit.
The engine was enclosed in a circular front cowl with center air intake entry and slotted exits for the cooling air below the fuselage. The machine was of solid construction, well finished and bore the company name, under the wings, and initials on the fuselage.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 43ft 6in
Length 30ft 2in
Height 10ft 6in
Area 250 sq ft
Area tailplane 40 sq ft (including elevators)
Area rudder. 14 sq ft
Weight 850 lb
Weight allup 1,4501b
Speed 55-58 mph
Price ?1,050
HANDLEY PAGE monoplane Type H/70 & H/110
The first of these projects by H.A. Petre was to be based on the Type F and fitted with a 70hp Gnome. The second, an improved type with 110hp Anzani and tandem seats in an elongated cockpit, was drawn by GR. Volkert in early 1913.
Alongside the Type E, a second monoplane was designed for the Military Trials, for which the previous machine was unsuitable, and was entered as No.28. Handley Page outlined the design to meet the specification, and Henry Petre prepared the drawings and was nominated as pilot. A crescent wing was to be used, which Henry Petre distrusted from experience of flying the Type E, which was unstable laterally in level flight, and he produced drawings for an alternative pair of straight wings, which were made without authority. These were fitted for the first flight at Barking, where the machine was built, but were removed when the machine was dismantled for dispatch to Larkhill, without being seen by Handley Page. Henry Petre refused to fly the machine with crescent wings and it was taken over by his brother Edward who flew it for the first time on 21 August 1912 in this form. Its performance at Larkhill was dogged by engine trouble, which eventually caused a forced landing and damage. The machine was withdrawn and taken to Hendon for repair and flew again on 9 November 1912, this time with Wilfred Parke as pilot. He was flying from Hendon to Oxford on 15 December 1912 with HP's manager, A. Arkell Hardwick as passenger, when the machine crashed at Wembley and both men were killed. It was not rebuilt.
The deep crescent wing, similar to the that of the previous Type E with warping control, was retained after the first flight, but was braced to a single point on a pylon above the fuselage. The pylon consisted of two hinged vee-struts which could be folded down for transport.
The fuselage was deep and flat sided, with curved top and bottom fairings, and seated two side by side. The observer, on the port side, was provided with a transparent panel also serving as an entry hatch. A center skid undercarriage, with divided axle and spring struts, was intended to support the tail also but was supplemented with a tail support of rattan cane There was no fin, but a large semicircular tailplane, divided elevator and balanced rudder with scalloped edges constituted the tail unit.
The engine was enclosed in a circular front cowl with center air intake entry and slotted exits for the cooling air below the fuselage. The machine was of solid construction, well finished and bore the company name, under the wings, and initials on the fuselage.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 43ft 6in
Length 30ft 2in
Height 10ft 6in
Area 250 sq ft
Area tailplane 40 sq ft (including elevators)
Area rudder. 14 sq ft
Weight 850 lb
Weight allup 1,4501b
Speed 55-58 mph
Price ?1,050
HANDLEY PAGE monoplane Type H/70 & H/110
The first of these projects by H.A. Petre was to be based on the Type F and fitted with a 70hp Gnome. The second, an improved type with 110hp Anzani and tandem seats in an elongated cockpit, was drawn by GR. Volkert in early 1913.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HANDLEY PAGE biplane Type G. HP.7. Also identified as G/100
The second biplane made by Handley Page was also of his own design, and was inspired by the monoplane ban, and a desire to improve on the BE.2, a small contract for which was in hand at Cricklewood, where the Type G was also constructed. Piloted by E.R. Whitehouse, it flew for the first time on 6 November 1913 at Hendon and, after company trials, was purchased by the new owner of the Lakes Flying Co., Lindsay Bainbridge, to be flown by Rowland Ding, also a director of that company.
It was intended to convert the machine later to a twin-float seaplane, but it was flown on tour as a land-plane after being taken over by Ding in May, until a mishap on 27 July 1914, when it was damaged and returned to the factory by rail. The repair was completed after the declaration of war. The machine was then taken over by the RNAS and continued to fly at Hendon and Chingford as No.892, until it was crashed in August 1914, the engine being bequeathed to Ding by Bainbridge, who was now deceased.
The Type G had a fuselage and tail unit similar to those of the Type E monoplane, with the pilot in the rear seat and room for one or two passengers in front. The engine was covered by a cowl at the top and had a continuous exhaust ring in front, exhausting through outlets below the bottom wing, to which a silencer was fitted later.
The top wing derived from the Type E, and the lower wing was a smaller version of that of the Type F. The wings had three bays, the outer bay having a single strut only at the rear spar, with short struts connected to both top and bottom leading edges.
The fuselage was mounted above the lower wing, to which it was attached by pairs of struts on either side. With the first type of undercarriage, which was of twin skid type, long struts were connected to the lower longerons just behind the engine. After the crash on 2 May 1914 a modified undercarriage with vee struts connected to the lower longerons was fitted, together with a smaller fin and the silencer. During its time with the RNAS the fuselage under-fairing was extended aft.
Power: 100hp Anzani ten-cylinder air-cooled radial driving a 8ft 6in diameter Integral propeller. The 100hp Green originally planned was not fitted.
Data
Span 40ft
Chord 6ft 6in max
Length 27ft later 25ft lin
Gap 6ft 6in
Area 384 sq ft
Area tailplane 32 sq ft
Area elevators 19 sq ft
Area rudder 12 1/2 sq ft
Weight 1,150 lb
Weight allup 1,775 lb
Speed range 35-73 mph
Climb to 3",000ft 10 l/2min
Endurance 4hr
Price ?1,500
HANDLEY PAGE biplane Type K/35.
A proposal for a single-seat, scaled down version of the Type G for training purposes was drawn by Volkert in December 1913; intended for use by the Beatty School at Hendon, it was not built.
Power: 35hp Anzani Y-type three-cylinder radial
Data
Span 30ft
Area 225 sq ft
An alternative Type K was described in the Handley Page Catalogue of 1913. This specified a two-seater with 80hp Gnome. This type apparently remained on paper only.
Data
Span 42ft
Area 250 sq ft
Weight 900 lb
Speed 65mph
Endurance 4 l/2hr
Price ?1,100
HANDLEY PAGE biplane Type L/200. HP.8
This large single-engined, tractor biplane was designed by Volkert in December 1913 to compete for the Daily Mail Prize of ?10,000 for an Atlantic crossing. It was ordered by Princess Ludwig of Lowenstein-Wertheim, who planned to accompany Rowland Ding on the flight, and it was nearing completion in the summer of 1914. The seats were side-by-side with dual controls. The machine was apparently a scaled-up version of the Type K/35 and was abandoned, although offered to the RNAS with straight wings.
Power: 200hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) fourteen-cylinder water-cooled radial.
Data
Span 60ft
Area 900 sq ft
Length 41ft
Weight 2,800 lb
Weight allup 6,000 lb
Speed range 43-80mph
Endurance 23hr
HANDLEY PAGE biplanes Types M/200 & MS/200 HP.9
In August 1914 when the 200hp engine for the L/200 was taken over by the Admiralty, a version was offered with two 100hp engines in the wings and then the M/200 with engines, mounted nose to nose in the fuselage, driving tractor propellers on the wings by chain. Both versions were rejected, as was the seaplane version MS/200, with twin main and tail floats. A crew of four was to be carried.
Power: Two 95hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) seven-cylinder water-cooled radials.
Data M/200 land-plane.
Span 70ft
Area 950 sq ft
Length 37ft 6in
Weight 3,000 lb
Weight allup 5,000lb
Speed 75mph
HANDLEY PAGE biplane Type N/80. HP. 10
A proposed scout version of the Type K/35, with a parallel center section inserted, and two seats side-by-side, the design of which was discontinued in January 1915.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 32ft 6in
Length 24ft
The second biplane made by Handley Page was also of his own design, and was inspired by the monoplane ban, and a desire to improve on the BE.2, a small contract for which was in hand at Cricklewood, where the Type G was also constructed. Piloted by E.R. Whitehouse, it flew for the first time on 6 November 1913 at Hendon and, after company trials, was purchased by the new owner of the Lakes Flying Co., Lindsay Bainbridge, to be flown by Rowland Ding, also a director of that company.
It was intended to convert the machine later to a twin-float seaplane, but it was flown on tour as a land-plane after being taken over by Ding in May, until a mishap on 27 July 1914, when it was damaged and returned to the factory by rail. The repair was completed after the declaration of war. The machine was then taken over by the RNAS and continued to fly at Hendon and Chingford as No.892, until it was crashed in August 1914, the engine being bequeathed to Ding by Bainbridge, who was now deceased.
The Type G had a fuselage and tail unit similar to those of the Type E monoplane, with the pilot in the rear seat and room for one or two passengers in front. The engine was covered by a cowl at the top and had a continuous exhaust ring in front, exhausting through outlets below the bottom wing, to which a silencer was fitted later.
The top wing derived from the Type E, and the lower wing was a smaller version of that of the Type F. The wings had three bays, the outer bay having a single strut only at the rear spar, with short struts connected to both top and bottom leading edges.
The fuselage was mounted above the lower wing, to which it was attached by pairs of struts on either side. With the first type of undercarriage, which was of twin skid type, long struts were connected to the lower longerons just behind the engine. After the crash on 2 May 1914 a modified undercarriage with vee struts connected to the lower longerons was fitted, together with a smaller fin and the silencer. During its time with the RNAS the fuselage under-fairing was extended aft.
Power: 100hp Anzani ten-cylinder air-cooled radial driving a 8ft 6in diameter Integral propeller. The 100hp Green originally planned was not fitted.
Data
Span 40ft
Chord 6ft 6in max
Length 27ft later 25ft lin
Gap 6ft 6in
Area 384 sq ft
Area tailplane 32 sq ft
Area elevators 19 sq ft
Area rudder 12 1/2 sq ft
Weight 1,150 lb
Weight allup 1,775 lb
Speed range 35-73 mph
Climb to 3",000ft 10 l/2min
Endurance 4hr
Price ?1,500
HANDLEY PAGE biplane Type K/35.
A proposal for a single-seat, scaled down version of the Type G for training purposes was drawn by Volkert in December 1913; intended for use by the Beatty School at Hendon, it was not built.
Power: 35hp Anzani Y-type three-cylinder radial
Data
Span 30ft
Area 225 sq ft
An alternative Type K was described in the Handley Page Catalogue of 1913. This specified a two-seater with 80hp Gnome. This type apparently remained on paper only.
Data
Span 42ft
Area 250 sq ft
Weight 900 lb
Speed 65mph
Endurance 4 l/2hr
Price ?1,100
HANDLEY PAGE biplane Type L/200. HP.8
This large single-engined, tractor biplane was designed by Volkert in December 1913 to compete for the Daily Mail Prize of ?10,000 for an Atlantic crossing. It was ordered by Princess Ludwig of Lowenstein-Wertheim, who planned to accompany Rowland Ding on the flight, and it was nearing completion in the summer of 1914. The seats were side-by-side with dual controls. The machine was apparently a scaled-up version of the Type K/35 and was abandoned, although offered to the RNAS with straight wings.
Power: 200hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) fourteen-cylinder water-cooled radial.
Data
Span 60ft
Area 900 sq ft
Length 41ft
Weight 2,800 lb
Weight allup 6,000 lb
Speed range 43-80mph
Endurance 23hr
HANDLEY PAGE biplanes Types M/200 & MS/200 HP.9
In August 1914 when the 200hp engine for the L/200 was taken over by the Admiralty, a version was offered with two 100hp engines in the wings and then the M/200 with engines, mounted nose to nose in the fuselage, driving tractor propellers on the wings by chain. Both versions were rejected, as was the seaplane version MS/200, with twin main and tail floats. A crew of four was to be carried.
Power: Two 95hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) seven-cylinder water-cooled radials.
Data M/200 land-plane.
Span 70ft
Area 950 sq ft
Length 37ft 6in
Weight 3,000 lb
Weight allup 5,000lb
Speed 75mph
HANDLEY PAGE biplane Type N/80. HP. 10
A proposed scout version of the Type K/35, with a parallel center section inserted, and two seats side-by-side, the design of which was discontinued in January 1915.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 32ft 6in
Length 24ft
HP Type G (HP7) biplane of 1913 in original form with twin-skid undercarriage and single long cockpit.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HART monoplane (William Henry Hart, Thornton Heath, Surrey)
Patent No. 1372/1911 was taken out by Hart in conjunction with Carl von Buchs for 'Improvements in Aeroplanes'. A company named Hart Aeroplanes & Waterplanes Ltd. was formed on 12 November 1912 and this was joined briefly by Howard T. Wright, before he moved to J. Samuel White & Co. Trials of a set of wings fitted to a 35hp Bleriot at Hendon, under the supervision of Grahame-White Aviation Co., were satisfactory, but not of interest to the industry. The Hart Co. was dissolved on 21 June 1916 having achieved nothing.
The invention consisted of a form of aeroplane wing construction, equivalent to that of a flying fish, with an arrangement of closing, balancing fans to which the balancing ends of the wings were connected, and a special forked rudder with fins above and below the fuselage to maintain the balance of the machine. The patent drawings convey the general arrangement.
Patent No. 1372/1911 was taken out by Hart in conjunction with Carl von Buchs for 'Improvements in Aeroplanes'. A company named Hart Aeroplanes & Waterplanes Ltd. was formed on 12 November 1912 and this was joined briefly by Howard T. Wright, before he moved to J. Samuel White & Co. Trials of a set of wings fitted to a 35hp Bleriot at Hendon, under the supervision of Grahame-White Aviation Co., were satisfactory, but not of interest to the industry. The Hart Co. was dissolved on 21 June 1916 having achieved nothing.
The invention consisted of a form of aeroplane wing construction, equivalent to that of a flying fish, with an arrangement of closing, balancing fans to which the balancing ends of the wings were connected, and a special forked rudder with fins above and below the fuselage to maintain the balance of the machine. The patent drawings convey the general arrangement.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HARTILL monoplane (A.E. Hartill, Cleveland St., Wolverhampton)
This machine was of Demoiselle type, built by Hartill for Dr. Hands. It was at Dunstall Park in 1910, but whether it flew is uncertain.
Power: 20hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Data
Span 26ft
Length 24ft
Weight 450 lb
This machine was of Demoiselle type, built by Hartill for Dr. Hands. It was at Dunstall Park in 1910, but whether it flew is uncertain.
Power: 20hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Data
Span 26ft
Length 24ft
Weight 450 lb
Hartill monoplane was of Demoiselle type and was at the Dunstall Park Meeting Wolverhampton in 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HAWKINS-OGILVIE triplane (Capt. A.C. Hawkins, Bertram Ogilvie & C.I. Nairn of Napier, New Zealand based at Winchester, Hampshire and later at Brooklands)
The partners built three machines between 1907 and 1910 in New Zealand. A pusher biplane powered by a 10hp Rex vee-twin motorcycle engine was mounted on a ramp for takeoff, but failed to sustain itself in flight. The 1910 machine, which had large ailerons below the bottom wing, was seen by Lord Kitchener on 11 March 1910, during a visit to New Zealand and he encouraged the experimenters to transfer to England for the greater opportunities, and to compete for the Baron de Forest Prize.
A model of a triplane was made during the voyage and the full size machine was constructed by Handley Page, but after the end of 1910 and thus not in time to compete for the Prize. It was ready for testing near Winchester in early March 1911, when it was reported 'rolling'. Ogilvie was the pilot with Hawkins providing the financial support.
There was a modest degree of success during the trials at Winchester and later at Brooklands before the finance was exhausted and the group returned to New Zealand. The machine was by this time of dated design.
The aircraft was an inelegant tractor triplane mounted on a high chassis with long skids and a tall tail-skid. The two bay wings were staggered and joined by long pairs of interplane struts, the forward struts being positioned at the leading edge, and the outers at the extreme tips of the wings. The tips of the wings were squarecut, and were fitted with duplicated, curved cane skids and differential ailerons fitted to all three pairs. The ailerons were separate rectangular flaps, not inset into the main wings, but were hinged at the trailing edges.
The fuselage girder was fabric covered from the pilot's cockpit aft to the tall sternpost, which supported the tail-skid below and carried a rhomboidal-shaped rudder above. There was no fin, only a strut to support the rudder post. The tailplane was rectangular, mounted on the top longerons and carried a one piece rhomboidal-shaped elevator, hinged along its narrow edge. Longitudinal stability was said to be automatically regulated by the action of the wind on the planes, the mechanism for this being covered by patent No.8212/1910.
Power: 50hp Alvaston four-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Data
Span 24ft
The partners built three machines between 1907 and 1910 in New Zealand. A pusher biplane powered by a 10hp Rex vee-twin motorcycle engine was mounted on a ramp for takeoff, but failed to sustain itself in flight. The 1910 machine, which had large ailerons below the bottom wing, was seen by Lord Kitchener on 11 March 1910, during a visit to New Zealand and he encouraged the experimenters to transfer to England for the greater opportunities, and to compete for the Baron de Forest Prize.
A model of a triplane was made during the voyage and the full size machine was constructed by Handley Page, but after the end of 1910 and thus not in time to compete for the Prize. It was ready for testing near Winchester in early March 1911, when it was reported 'rolling'. Ogilvie was the pilot with Hawkins providing the financial support.
There was a modest degree of success during the trials at Winchester and later at Brooklands before the finance was exhausted and the group returned to New Zealand. The machine was by this time of dated design.
The aircraft was an inelegant tractor triplane mounted on a high chassis with long skids and a tall tail-skid. The two bay wings were staggered and joined by long pairs of interplane struts, the forward struts being positioned at the leading edge, and the outers at the extreme tips of the wings. The tips of the wings were squarecut, and were fitted with duplicated, curved cane skids and differential ailerons fitted to all three pairs. The ailerons were separate rectangular flaps, not inset into the main wings, but were hinged at the trailing edges.
The fuselage girder was fabric covered from the pilot's cockpit aft to the tall sternpost, which supported the tail-skid below and carried a rhomboidal-shaped rudder above. There was no fin, only a strut to support the rudder post. The tailplane was rectangular, mounted on the top longerons and carried a one piece rhomboidal-shaped elevator, hinged along its narrow edge. Longitudinal stability was said to be automatically regulated by the action of the wind on the planes, the mechanism for this being covered by patent No.8212/1910.
Power: 50hp Alvaston four-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled.
Data
Span 24ft
Hawkins-Ogilvie triplane built by Handley Page for partners from New Zealand was tested near Winchester and at Brooklands in 1911.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HENSHAW cycloplane (Jack Henshaw)
This was reported to have been tried downhill by the young constructor, but required larger wings to enable it to take off. Nothing further reported.
This was reported to have been tried downhill by the young constructor, but required larger wings to enable it to take off. Nothing further reported.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HENSON monoplane (William Samuel Henson, Chard, Somerset)
W.S. Henson was an inventor who began experimenting in 1840 with model gliders, and in 1842, his patent No.9478 described a monoplane of advanced conception, to be powered by a steam engine, from which 25-30hp was expected. Earlier, he had become acquainted with John Stringfellow, a fellow inventor and designer of machinery, including light steam engines for driving lace making machines. It is believed that Stringfellow contributed his knowledge to further the design of the aeroplane.
From 1843 Henson and Stringfellow experimented with various steam powered models, with wing span up to 20ft, near Chard. In association with others, a company known as 'The Aerial Steam Transit Co.' was formed in 1844. There was considerable publicity, but the project was premature and collapsed. Henson finally withdrew from aeronautical work and emigrated to America in 1848, but Stringfellow worked on after 1848 achieving short flights with small models. His interest revived in 1866, and he won a prize of ?100 at the Crystal Palace for a successful flight. Stringfellow died in 1883 and certain of his models are exhibited at the Science Museum. Henson died in 1888 at Newark, New Jersey, U.S.A.
The proposed Henson aeroplane was to be a large monoplane, with passengers housed in a cabin below the wing, and was mounted on a tricycle undercarriage. The machine was to be launched down an incline and then propelled by two six bladed propellers driven by belts from the engine, which with its large boilers was positioned above the cabin.
Power: 25-30hp Stringfellow two-cylinder steam engine.
Data
Span 150ft
Chord 30ft
Wing area 4,500 sq ft
Tail area 1,500 sqft
W.S. Henson was an inventor who began experimenting in 1840 with model gliders, and in 1842, his patent No.9478 described a monoplane of advanced conception, to be powered by a steam engine, from which 25-30hp was expected. Earlier, he had become acquainted with John Stringfellow, a fellow inventor and designer of machinery, including light steam engines for driving lace making machines. It is believed that Stringfellow contributed his knowledge to further the design of the aeroplane.
From 1843 Henson and Stringfellow experimented with various steam powered models, with wing span up to 20ft, near Chard. In association with others, a company known as 'The Aerial Steam Transit Co.' was formed in 1844. There was considerable publicity, but the project was premature and collapsed. Henson finally withdrew from aeronautical work and emigrated to America in 1848, but Stringfellow worked on after 1848 achieving short flights with small models. His interest revived in 1866, and he won a prize of ?100 at the Crystal Palace for a successful flight. Stringfellow died in 1883 and certain of his models are exhibited at the Science Museum. Henson died in 1888 at Newark, New Jersey, U.S.A.
The proposed Henson aeroplane was to be a large monoplane, with passengers housed in a cabin below the wing, and was mounted on a tricycle undercarriage. The machine was to be launched down an incline and then propelled by two six bladed propellers driven by belts from the engine, which with its large boilers was positioned above the cabin.
Power: 25-30hp Stringfellow two-cylinder steam engine.
Data
Span 150ft
Chord 30ft
Wing area 4,500 sq ft
Tail area 1,500 sqft
Henson monoplane. The fullsize version was part of an ambitious scheme in the middle nineteenth century and was to be steam powered.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HEWITT ornithopter (S.R. Hewitt, 39 Lonsdale St., Belfast)
This machine was constructed in 1908, and had two planes of 32ft span and 7ft chord, of which 2ft was flexible trailing edge. The machine was mounted on a tricycle undercarriage and had a front elevator and biplane tail.
This machine was constructed in 1908, and had two planes of 32ft span and 7ft chord, of which 2ft was flexible trailing edge. The machine was mounted on a tricycle undercarriage and had a front elevator and biplane tail.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HEWITT glider (V.V.D. Hewitt, Trefnant, N. Wales)
Hewitt's glider was a biplane with single surfaced wings, the fabric covering being on the underside. The published illustration showed a biplane front elevator; there was a tailplane, not illustrated, and midgap ailerons. The fitting of an engine did not proceed. He took delivery of a Bleriot monoplane in early 1910 and flew to Ireland in it, in April 1912, but gave up aviation in 1914.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 6ft
Hewitt's glider was a biplane with single surfaced wings, the fabric covering being on the underside. The published illustration showed a biplane front elevator; there was a tailplane, not illustrated, and midgap ailerons. The fitting of an engine did not proceed. He took delivery of a Bleriot monoplane in early 1910 and flew to Ireland in it, in April 1912, but gave up aviation in 1914.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 6ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HEWLETT glider biplane
A photograph taken in about 1912 possibly shows Francis Hewlett, son of Hilda Hewlett, at the controls of a small biplane glider. Although quite well designed, it may have been built as a 'toy' at the Hewlett & Blondeau works. The photo may have been taken in the grounds of a church in Northwick Terrace, Maida Vale, London NW, close to the Hewlett home.
A photograph taken in about 1912 possibly shows Francis Hewlett, son of Hilda Hewlett, at the controls of a small biplane glider. Although quite well designed, it may have been built as a 'toy' at the Hewlett & Blondeau works. The photo may have been taken in the grounds of a church in Northwick Terrace, Maida Vale, London NW, close to the Hewlett home.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HIGGINS glider (Henry Higgins, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire)
This glider was designed and built in 1910, and was tested successfully at Cleeve Hill, near Cheltenham. It was a canard monoplane with the pilot seated below the wing, above the axle of the wheels. Control was provided by a front elevator, and by warping the wing, with a foot bar. A movable 'blinker' was fitted in the front bay of the single girder structure.
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 6ft
Length 20ft
Area 160 sq ft
Area elevator 16 sq ft
Weight 941b
HIGGINS monoplane
The glider had been built with the intention of fitting a low powered engine later, and one was installed as a pusher in 1911. A two-cylinder JAP of 10-12hp was fitted below the wing, driving a 7ft 2in diameter propeller by chain. A tail was fitted 12ft behind the cg; a fixed plane below the elevator increased the lifting surface to 196 sq ft and the weight to 280 lb. In this form the machine was unsuccessful.
In 1912 further changes increased the span to 30ft, the lifting area to 240 sq ft and weight to 300 lb. There were no further reports and it is presumed that the machine was not a success.
This glider was designed and built in 1910, and was tested successfully at Cleeve Hill, near Cheltenham. It was a canard monoplane with the pilot seated below the wing, above the axle of the wheels. Control was provided by a front elevator, and by warping the wing, with a foot bar. A movable 'blinker' was fitted in the front bay of the single girder structure.
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 6ft
Length 20ft
Area 160 sq ft
Area elevator 16 sq ft
Weight 941b
HIGGINS monoplane
The glider had been built with the intention of fitting a low powered engine later, and one was installed as a pusher in 1911. A two-cylinder JAP of 10-12hp was fitted below the wing, driving a 7ft 2in diameter propeller by chain. A tail was fitted 12ft behind the cg; a fixed plane below the elevator increased the lifting surface to 196 sq ft and the weight to 280 lb. In this form the machine was unsuccessful.
In 1912 further changes increased the span to 30ft, the lifting area to 240 sq ft and weight to 300 lb. There were no further reports and it is presumed that the machine was not a success.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HILL monoplane (Hill & Co., Bury, Lancashire)
This company built a single-seater monoplane, similar in layout to a Bleriot XI, but with a modified undercarriage and three large bicycle type wheels. There is no evidence that the machine actually flew.
This company built a single-seater monoplane, similar in layout to a Bleriot XI, but with a modified undercarriage and three large bicycle type wheels. There is no evidence that the machine actually flew.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HILL glider (Geoffrey T.R. Hill and Roderic M. Hill)
This biplane glider, with boat-like hull, was built by the Hill brothers in 1913-1914, and was flown off the slope of Firle Beacon in the South Downs. It was intended to fit an engine and wheels, but this was prevented by the outbreak of war. Geoffrey was to become famous as the designer of Pterodactyl aircraft, built by the Westland company; Roderic became an Air Marshal.
This biplane glider, with boat-like hull, was built by the Hill brothers in 1913-1914, and was flown off the slope of Firle Beacon in the South Downs. It was intended to fit an engine and wheels, but this was prevented by the outbreak of war. Geoffrey was to become famous as the designer of Pterodactyl aircraft, built by the Westland company; Roderic became an Air Marshal.
Hill glider was built by the brothers at their Sussex home in 1913-1914. Later they became well known in aviation circles.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HILL glider (H. Hill, Paddington Aero Club)
This was a monoplane glider, of the Demoiselle type, designed to fold easily for transport. It was proposed by a club member in 1912 and may have been evolved from the Hill glider mentioned below.
Data
Span 24ft
Chord 5ft
Area 120 sq ft
Tail elevator 32 sq ft
HILL monoplane glider (E. King Hill, Paddington, London)
This glider of Demoiselle type was partially complete in December 1910.
This was a monoplane glider, of the Demoiselle type, designed to fold easily for transport. It was proposed by a club member in 1912 and may have been evolved from the Hill glider mentioned below.
Data
Span 24ft
Chord 5ft
Area 120 sq ft
Tail elevator 32 sq ft
HILL monoplane glider (E. King Hill, Paddington, London)
This glider of Demoiselle type was partially complete in December 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HOPKIRK & McCORMICK glider (F.C. Hopkirk and W.E. McCormick, Ireland)
This biplane glider was built in 1912, and was towed down a slope, achieving several short hops, culminating on 14 December 1912, with a good flight in gusty weather, after which the machine was wrecked on landing. The glider had a front elevator, ailerons and 18ft long skids fitted with wheels.
Data
Span 20ft
Chord 5ft
Gap 5ft 8in
Area 200 sq ft
This biplane glider was built in 1912, and was towed down a slope, achieving several short hops, culminating on 14 December 1912, with a good flight in gusty weather, after which the machine was wrecked on landing. The glider had a front elevator, ailerons and 18ft long skids fitted with wheels.
Data
Span 20ft
Chord 5ft
Gap 5ft 8in
Area 200 sq ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HORNSTEIN biplanes (N.A. Hornstein, a Russian domiciled in London)
Two biplanes designed by Hornstein, with contributions by Livet de Loriere of the Thames Bank Wharf Co., were constructed in 1909-1910. The first of these, with a JAP engine, was flown very successfully by Hornstein at Upper Halliford, near Shepperton, Middlesex on 25 and again on 27 March 1910, when he landed in a ploughed field, without injury. Further flights were also made by Ernest de Loriere between 17 and 24 April 1910 when distances of 300-400 yards were flown, rising at times to fifty feet.
Both machines were of similar design, being pusher biplanes with front elevator and the tail carried on open booms. The undercarriage had three pairs of bicycle wheels, the front pair on mountings, with projecting skids. Ailerons were fitted to top and bottom wings and were operated by the pilot, seated on the lower wing, by sideways movement of the body, the back of his seat being arranged to pivot for this purpose.
The second machine had a Green engine and was of approximately similar size. Hornstein also referred to an 80hp Italian engine to be given a trial on a later machine. The Hornstein machines soon faded from the aviation scene.
See the Thames Bank Wharf Co.
Power:
35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee
35hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled
Both engines drove 6ft 11 in diameter Chauviere propellers
Data JAP Green
Span 32ft 10in 36ft
Chord 5ft 9in -
Area 378 sq ft 414 sq ft
Length 34ft -
Weight 696 lb 700 lb
Two biplanes designed by Hornstein, with contributions by Livet de Loriere of the Thames Bank Wharf Co., were constructed in 1909-1910. The first of these, with a JAP engine, was flown very successfully by Hornstein at Upper Halliford, near Shepperton, Middlesex on 25 and again on 27 March 1910, when he landed in a ploughed field, without injury. Further flights were also made by Ernest de Loriere between 17 and 24 April 1910 when distances of 300-400 yards were flown, rising at times to fifty feet.
Both machines were of similar design, being pusher biplanes with front elevator and the tail carried on open booms. The undercarriage had three pairs of bicycle wheels, the front pair on mountings, with projecting skids. Ailerons were fitted to top and bottom wings and were operated by the pilot, seated on the lower wing, by sideways movement of the body, the back of his seat being arranged to pivot for this purpose.
The second machine had a Green engine and was of approximately similar size. Hornstein also referred to an 80hp Italian engine to be given a trial on a later machine. The Hornstein machines soon faded from the aviation scene.
See the Thames Bank Wharf Co.
Power:
35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee
35hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled
Both engines drove 6ft 11 in diameter Chauviere propellers
Data JAP Green
Span 32ft 10in 36ft
Chord 5ft 9in -
Area 378 sq ft 414 sq ft
Length 34ft -
Weight 696 lb 700 lb
Hornstein biplane with Green engine built by the Thames Bank Wharf Co. in 1909-1910. The first machine with JAP engine was tested at Upper Halliford near Shepperton.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HOWARD WRIGHT aircraft (Howard T. Wright Bros. Ltd., Belgravia Chambers, 72 Victoria St., SW1. Works at Prince of Wales Rd., Battersea)
Howard Wright became involved in aeronautical work when working for Hiram Maxim, between 1899 and 1904. In July 1905, together with his brothers Warwick and Walter, the above company was formed, which included the goodwill of Maxim's company. An enquiry from an Italian inventor, Federico Capone, intended for the defunct Maxim company, was received in early 1907 for a helicopter to Capone's own design. The order was concluded and was the start of manufacture of flying machines by Howard Wright.
The manufacture of the helicopter began in November 1907 at the premises of Warwick Wright Ltd. at 110 High St., Marylebone, but was transferred to Battersea under railway arch No.80. Growth of aviation work necessitated further premises and arches Nos.79 and 82 were rented later. The ground used for testing conventional aircraft was Brooklands, where Shed No.9 was in use throughout 1911, until the business was closed. Howard Wright then became the manager of the Coventry Ordnance Works Aviation Dept at the beginning of the following year.
In addition to aircraft of his own design, Howard Wright produced others, bearing their owner's or designer's name, notably the Barber, ASL and Poynter monoplanes. Apart from responsibility for the actual construction, Howard Wright was no doubt involved with some design aspects of these, and probably bore most of the design responsibility in the case of the Cooke, Lascelles and Scottish Aeroplane Syndicate monoplanes. In the five years of its existence the company built approximately thirty-five aircraft, Howard Wright being joined in December 1908 by W.O. Manning, who from then on undertook much of the design responsibility.
HOWARD WRIGHT gliders
A triplane glider was reported in October 1908 and a biplane glider in course of construction in June 1909 at Battersea. No information on these is available.
HOWARD WRIGHT biplane 1909 type
A machine constructed early in 1909, to the order of M.H. Seton-Karr, was shown at Olympia in March. It was damaged in transit to Fambridge, Essex, where it was taken for trials after the show. Further damage occurred during the trials, resulting from the propeller bursting and also the shed collapsing. Short hops of some 30ft in length were achieved by the end of May on the unsatisfactory ground. Later trials were transferred to Camber Sands, where flight was achieved, the machine continuing in use until the end of the year.
Another machine of the same type, already constructed, was reported to have been ordered by WE. Cooke of Burnley in September 1909. This was not delivered to Cooke, who received the first Howard Wright monoplane instead.
This rather ungainly pusher biplane, although well constructed and incorporating advanced features at the time, was not a great success.
The structure of the nacelle and tail booms was of welded light gauge steel tube, some of streamlined section; the nacelle was fabric covered and accommodated two persons. The machine had a single track undercarriage, consisting of one main wheel and a smaller tailwheel, supplemented by large wheels at the wingtips, on one of which the machine normally rested.
The wings were of wooden construction, fabric covered. The gap was maintained by three pairs of interplane struts, the outboard pair covered by fabric side curtains. Small ailerons, extending slightly beyond the trailing edge, were fitted to top and bottom wings.
The front elevator was a biplane structure with side curtains and the whole unit pivoted on the nose of the nacelle. The tail unit consisted of a fixed biplane structure with side curtains and central rudder.
During the course of the trials the lower corners of the side curtains of the tail were cut away to provide ground clearance. The members of the undercarriage, for the single main wheel, were strengthened and an additional pair of small wheels were fitted on a new mounting, below the rear of the nacelle. These wheels were intended to aid the leveling process on take off, as this did not take place at a sufficiently low speed.
The power was transmitted through a reduction gearbox to contra-rotating propellers, the front blades of which were of greater chord, and intended to absorb two thirds of the power. The blades were of wood on tubular steel shanks, but after the propeller disintegrated at Fambridge a single wooden propeller was fitted.
Power: 60hp Metallurgique four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving through a 3 to 1 reduction gearbox a patented, contra-rotating 5ft diameter pusher propeller
Data
Span 40ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Gap 6ft 6in
Area 520 sq ft
Length 43ft
Weight allup 1,600lb
Weight 1,100lb
Speed 35mph
Price ?1,200
Howard Wright became involved in aeronautical work when working for Hiram Maxim, between 1899 and 1904. In July 1905, together with his brothers Warwick and Walter, the above company was formed, which included the goodwill of Maxim's company. An enquiry from an Italian inventor, Federico Capone, intended for the defunct Maxim company, was received in early 1907 for a helicopter to Capone's own design. The order was concluded and was the start of manufacture of flying machines by Howard Wright.
The manufacture of the helicopter began in November 1907 at the premises of Warwick Wright Ltd. at 110 High St., Marylebone, but was transferred to Battersea under railway arch No.80. Growth of aviation work necessitated further premises and arches Nos.79 and 82 were rented later. The ground used for testing conventional aircraft was Brooklands, where Shed No.9 was in use throughout 1911, until the business was closed. Howard Wright then became the manager of the Coventry Ordnance Works Aviation Dept at the beginning of the following year.
In addition to aircraft of his own design, Howard Wright produced others, bearing their owner's or designer's name, notably the Barber, ASL and Poynter monoplanes. Apart from responsibility for the actual construction, Howard Wright was no doubt involved with some design aspects of these, and probably bore most of the design responsibility in the case of the Cooke, Lascelles and Scottish Aeroplane Syndicate monoplanes. In the five years of its existence the company built approximately thirty-five aircraft, Howard Wright being joined in December 1908 by W.O. Manning, who from then on undertook much of the design responsibility.
HOWARD WRIGHT gliders
A triplane glider was reported in October 1908 and a biplane glider in course of construction in June 1909 at Battersea. No information on these is available.
HOWARD WRIGHT biplane 1909 type
A machine constructed early in 1909, to the order of M.H. Seton-Karr, was shown at Olympia in March. It was damaged in transit to Fambridge, Essex, where it was taken for trials after the show. Further damage occurred during the trials, resulting from the propeller bursting and also the shed collapsing. Short hops of some 30ft in length were achieved by the end of May on the unsatisfactory ground. Later trials were transferred to Camber Sands, where flight was achieved, the machine continuing in use until the end of the year.
Another machine of the same type, already constructed, was reported to have been ordered by WE. Cooke of Burnley in September 1909. This was not delivered to Cooke, who received the first Howard Wright monoplane instead.
This rather ungainly pusher biplane, although well constructed and incorporating advanced features at the time, was not a great success.
The structure of the nacelle and tail booms was of welded light gauge steel tube, some of streamlined section; the nacelle was fabric covered and accommodated two persons. The machine had a single track undercarriage, consisting of one main wheel and a smaller tailwheel, supplemented by large wheels at the wingtips, on one of which the machine normally rested.
The wings were of wooden construction, fabric covered. The gap was maintained by three pairs of interplane struts, the outboard pair covered by fabric side curtains. Small ailerons, extending slightly beyond the trailing edge, were fitted to top and bottom wings.
The front elevator was a biplane structure with side curtains and the whole unit pivoted on the nose of the nacelle. The tail unit consisted of a fixed biplane structure with side curtains and central rudder.
During the course of the trials the lower corners of the side curtains of the tail were cut away to provide ground clearance. The members of the undercarriage, for the single main wheel, were strengthened and an additional pair of small wheels were fitted on a new mounting, below the rear of the nacelle. These wheels were intended to aid the leveling process on take off, as this did not take place at a sufficiently low speed.
The power was transmitted through a reduction gearbox to contra-rotating propellers, the front blades of which were of greater chord, and intended to absorb two thirds of the power. The blades were of wood on tubular steel shanks, but after the propeller disintegrated at Fambridge a single wooden propeller was fitted.
Power: 60hp Metallurgique four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving through a 3 to 1 reduction gearbox a patented, contra-rotating 5ft diameter pusher propeller
Data
Span 40ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Gap 6ft 6in
Area 520 sq ft
Length 43ft
Weight allup 1,600lb
Weight 1,100lb
Speed 35mph
Price ?1,200
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HOWARD WRIGHT monoplane 1909 type
This was the only one of its type, and was delivered to W.E. Cooke of the East Lancashire Aeroplane and Motor Co. on behalf of the Burnley and District Aero Club instead of the biplane originally ordered. It was dispatched by rail to Burnley where it arrived on 9 October 1909 and was immediately assembled for exhibition at the Athletic Ground, Brunshaw and was taxied, after some difficulty starting the engine. It was also displayed at Accrington and Blackburn, where the propeller flew off and was damaged. Thereafter the machine soon passed into other hands and finally to H.K. Hales of Burslem, the man who donated the Hales Trophy for the Blue Riband crossing of the Atlantic by ocean liner. Hales attempted to make the first flight of the machine at Keele Racecourse on 10 July 1910, where it crashed badly after twenty-five seconds. It was rebuilt and advertised for sale in The Aero, 12 October 1910, but this was the last heard of the machine.
There was some similarity between this and the Barber monoplane, which had been delivered shortly before. It had a welded light gauge tubular steel fuselage structure, parallel in depth throughout its length, apart from a slightly increased depth of the engine bay. Three large spoked wheels, in forks, were each sprung by a telescopic strut, the radius arm pivoting on tubular mountings below the fuselage.
The wings were tapered and braced to the undercarriage uprights, and to a cabane above the fuselage, in which the streamlined fuel tank was hung. Lateral control was by warping the wing using foot pedals. A structure for mounting the warping gear hung below the fuselage. End type elevators were fitted to a fixed tailplane below the fuselage girder; a simple triangular rudder completed the tail unit.
The engine was cooled by long narrow condensing radiators on each side of the fuselage and could be started from the pilot's position, which was placed well back along the fuselage. The machine was intended to hold three people.
Power: 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 32ft
Mean chord 7ft 6in
Area 240 sq ft *
Length. 27ft
Weight 750 lb
Endurance 3hr
Price ?1,000
*Flight reported 200 sq ft
HOWARD WRIGHT monoplanes (1909-1910 'Standard' type and Lascelles Ornis)
In early December 1909 The Aero described and illustrated the latest machine at Battersea, still minus its Lascelles engine, and indicated that two similar aircraft had been made for customers and several others were in the course of construction. A machine of the type appeared at Olympia in March 1910 on the stand of R. Lascelles & Co. of 13 Greek Street London, identified as the Lascelles Ornis, but this had a Bleriot-like rudder, instead of the triangular type shown earlier in The Aero 7 December 1909 (p.493). The Ornis was sold to A.G. Power, who housed the machine at Brooklands. The monoplanes produced later from Battersea were of somewhat different types.
The description as a 'standard' type may well have applied only to certain details of the construction, for there were no large quantities of the type made. Reports of the time gave variations of dimensions for the aircraft being described.
The fuselage was based on a wooden, braced girder made of ash, with steel angle fittings at the junctions and spoke and nipple type bracings. The undercarriage was of steel tube, as in the 1909 Cooke type monoplane, and three equal sized wheels were fitted.
The wings were parallel in chord and incorporated control by warping. End elevators were fitted to the tailplane and the rudder shape was triangular, when first seen, but rectangular on the Ornis, making the machine appear more like a Bleriot.
1909-1910 monoplane
Power: 35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type, semi-radial.
Data
Span 28ft
Area 160 sq ft
Length 27ft
Weight 500 lb
Ornis monoplane
Power: 35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type, semi-radial driving a 8ft diameter Weiss propeller
Data
Span 28ft
Chord 6ft
Length 28ft
Area 160 sq ft
Weight 400 lb
Weight allup 600lb
Speed 30mph
Price ?450
This was the only one of its type, and was delivered to W.E. Cooke of the East Lancashire Aeroplane and Motor Co. on behalf of the Burnley and District Aero Club instead of the biplane originally ordered. It was dispatched by rail to Burnley where it arrived on 9 October 1909 and was immediately assembled for exhibition at the Athletic Ground, Brunshaw and was taxied, after some difficulty starting the engine. It was also displayed at Accrington and Blackburn, where the propeller flew off and was damaged. Thereafter the machine soon passed into other hands and finally to H.K. Hales of Burslem, the man who donated the Hales Trophy for the Blue Riband crossing of the Atlantic by ocean liner. Hales attempted to make the first flight of the machine at Keele Racecourse on 10 July 1910, where it crashed badly after twenty-five seconds. It was rebuilt and advertised for sale in The Aero, 12 October 1910, but this was the last heard of the machine.
There was some similarity between this and the Barber monoplane, which had been delivered shortly before. It had a welded light gauge tubular steel fuselage structure, parallel in depth throughout its length, apart from a slightly increased depth of the engine bay. Three large spoked wheels, in forks, were each sprung by a telescopic strut, the radius arm pivoting on tubular mountings below the fuselage.
The wings were tapered and braced to the undercarriage uprights, and to a cabane above the fuselage, in which the streamlined fuel tank was hung. Lateral control was by warping the wing using foot pedals. A structure for mounting the warping gear hung below the fuselage. End type elevators were fitted to a fixed tailplane below the fuselage girder; a simple triangular rudder completed the tail unit.
The engine was cooled by long narrow condensing radiators on each side of the fuselage and could be started from the pilot's position, which was placed well back along the fuselage. The machine was intended to hold three people.
Power: 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 32ft
Mean chord 7ft 6in
Area 240 sq ft *
Length. 27ft
Weight 750 lb
Endurance 3hr
Price ?1,000
*Flight reported 200 sq ft
HOWARD WRIGHT monoplanes (1909-1910 'Standard' type and Lascelles Ornis)
In early December 1909 The Aero described and illustrated the latest machine at Battersea, still minus its Lascelles engine, and indicated that two similar aircraft had been made for customers and several others were in the course of construction. A machine of the type appeared at Olympia in March 1910 on the stand of R. Lascelles & Co. of 13 Greek Street London, identified as the Lascelles Ornis, but this had a Bleriot-like rudder, instead of the triangular type shown earlier in The Aero 7 December 1909 (p.493). The Ornis was sold to A.G. Power, who housed the machine at Brooklands. The monoplanes produced later from Battersea were of somewhat different types.
The description as a 'standard' type may well have applied only to certain details of the construction, for there were no large quantities of the type made. Reports of the time gave variations of dimensions for the aircraft being described.
The fuselage was based on a wooden, braced girder made of ash, with steel angle fittings at the junctions and spoke and nipple type bracings. The undercarriage was of steel tube, as in the 1909 Cooke type monoplane, and three equal sized wheels were fitted.
The wings were parallel in chord and incorporated control by warping. End elevators were fitted to the tailplane and the rudder shape was triangular, when first seen, but rectangular on the Ornis, making the machine appear more like a Bleriot.
1909-1910 monoplane
Power: 35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type, semi-radial.
Data
Span 28ft
Area 160 sq ft
Length 27ft
Weight 500 lb
Ornis monoplane
Power: 35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type, semi-radial driving a 8ft diameter Weiss propeller
Data
Span 28ft
Chord 6ft
Length 28ft
Area 160 sq ft
Weight 400 lb
Weight allup 600lb
Speed 30mph
Price ?450
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HOWARD WRIGHT monoplanes Avis Type 1910
The first of these aircraft was delivered at Brooklands to the Scottish Aviation Syndicate in which the Hon A.R. Boyle was the leading figure and pilot. The machine was named 'The Golden Plover' and he tested it early in 1910, but it was underpowered with the original 25-30hp Anzani and so was returned to the works for a more powerful engine to be fitted. Other changes were also carried out, including reducing the length of the rudder. It was returned later to Brooklands where it was flown successfully in March and was then renamed Avis.
Four Avis machines were built for the SAS and were fitted with various engines. After the early Anzanis, JAP and ENV engines were also fitted; a report of a 35hp Green being used in June 1910 may have been incorrect.
There were several changes of design from the earlier type monoplanes. The undercarriage was completely redesigned and now consisted of a tubular structure with twin wooden skids and two pairs of wheels on separate axles, sprung by rubber cord. The tailwheel was smaller and was sprung by coil spring.
The fuselage girder was reduced in depth towards the tail to earn' a universally jointed tail unit of cruciform type. This was similar to the Demoiselle type and had triangular shaped balance areas forward of the hinge on both horizontal and vertical surfaces. The actual surfaces were of light construction with wire edges giving a scalloped effect. On Avis III, at least, more area was added, which eliminated the pointed trailing edge tip.
Power:
25-30hp and 30-35hp Anzani three-cylinder fan-type, air-cooled semi-radial driving a 6ft diameter propeller
35-40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee (Avis II & III)
35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee (Avis I)
Data
Span 28ft
Chord 6ft 4in
Length. 27ft.
Area 160 sqft
Area rudder 14 sq ft
Area elevator 22 sq ft
Weight 430 lb
Weight allup 630 lb
Speed 35-40mph
Price ?370-?490
The first of these aircraft was delivered at Brooklands to the Scottish Aviation Syndicate in which the Hon A.R. Boyle was the leading figure and pilot. The machine was named 'The Golden Plover' and he tested it early in 1910, but it was underpowered with the original 25-30hp Anzani and so was returned to the works for a more powerful engine to be fitted. Other changes were also carried out, including reducing the length of the rudder. It was returned later to Brooklands where it was flown successfully in March and was then renamed Avis.
Four Avis machines were built for the SAS and were fitted with various engines. After the early Anzanis, JAP and ENV engines were also fitted; a report of a 35hp Green being used in June 1910 may have been incorrect.
There were several changes of design from the earlier type monoplanes. The undercarriage was completely redesigned and now consisted of a tubular structure with twin wooden skids and two pairs of wheels on separate axles, sprung by rubber cord. The tailwheel was smaller and was sprung by coil spring.
The fuselage girder was reduced in depth towards the tail to earn' a universally jointed tail unit of cruciform type. This was similar to the Demoiselle type and had triangular shaped balance areas forward of the hinge on both horizontal and vertical surfaces. The actual surfaces were of light construction with wire edges giving a scalloped effect. On Avis III, at least, more area was added, which eliminated the pointed trailing edge tip.
Power:
25-30hp and 30-35hp Anzani three-cylinder fan-type, air-cooled semi-radial driving a 6ft diameter propeller
35-40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee (Avis II & III)
35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee (Avis I)
Data
Span 28ft
Chord 6ft 4in
Length. 27ft.
Area 160 sqft
Area rudder 14 sq ft
Area elevator 22 sq ft
Weight 430 lb
Weight allup 630 lb
Speed 35-40mph
Price ?370-?490
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HOWARD WRIGHT monoplane 1910 Type
An alternative type of monoplane was also constructed in 1910, one of which, for Warwick Wright, appeared on the company's stand at Olympia in March. The first of the type to fly was the second machine for Capt. Hinds-Howell, which became airborne at Brooklands on 26 March 1910. The third was the machine bought by Tom Sopwith, on which he carried out his first flights in October and was used to test the first 40hp ABC engine, in April 1912, by R.L. Charteris.
The structure of the aircraft was similar to that of the Avis, but a more conventional tail unit with end elevators and a rectangular rudder, as on the Ornis, were obvious changes. Water-cooled engines were used on all three machines, the radiators on the first two being across the full width of the wing, just below the surface. Sopwith's machine had one radiator positioned below the fuselage, one vee-shaped pylon above the fuselage and a tail-skid instead of a tail wheel, also full span elevators.
Power: 35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving a 6ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 27ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Length 29ft
Area 190sqft*
Area tailplane 18 sq ft
Area elevators 18 sq ft
Area rudder 7 sq ft
Weight 455 lb*
Weight allup 655 lb*
Speed 35-40mph
Price ?650
*Various figures quoted
HOWARD WRIGHT Monoplanes, various types
In January or February 1910, when the representative of The Aero visited the works at Battersea, several aircraft were under construction, whose completion and utilization cannot be established. They were as follows:
'Santos Dumont' type
A slightly larger version of the Demoiselle with a triangular section fuselage of bamboo. It is believed that this machine was completed in 1910.
Power: 30hp Darracq two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled with 6ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 19ft
Area 120 sq ft
Weight allup 255 lb
Speed 48mph
Length 21ft
'Antoinette' type
A two-seater enlarged version of the Avis was under construction. The wing was completed in a crate and the engine already installed in the fuselage. No record of completion of this machine has been traced.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled
Data
Span 42ft
Area 320 sq ft
Length 40ft
Weight allup 800 1b
'Bleriot XII' type
This machine was described as such from the position of the engine low down in the frame, with the propeller above, driven by a chain. The pilot and passenger sat below the wing behind the engine. The monoplane tail had end elevators and the multisided rudder was similar to that on the Avis.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee
Data
Span 35ft
Area 360 sq ft
Length 46ft
Weight allup 1,100lb
Racing Type biplane
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 36ft
with outer lower panels removed 22ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft
Area 432 sq ft could reduce to 348 sq ft
Length 37ft
An alternative type of monoplane was also constructed in 1910, one of which, for Warwick Wright, appeared on the company's stand at Olympia in March. The first of the type to fly was the second machine for Capt. Hinds-Howell, which became airborne at Brooklands on 26 March 1910. The third was the machine bought by Tom Sopwith, on which he carried out his first flights in October and was used to test the first 40hp ABC engine, in April 1912, by R.L. Charteris.
The structure of the aircraft was similar to that of the Avis, but a more conventional tail unit with end elevators and a rectangular rudder, as on the Ornis, were obvious changes. Water-cooled engines were used on all three machines, the radiators on the first two being across the full width of the wing, just below the surface. Sopwith's machine had one radiator positioned below the fuselage, one vee-shaped pylon above the fuselage and a tail-skid instead of a tail wheel, also full span elevators.
Power: 35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee driving a 6ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 27ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Length 29ft
Area 190sqft*
Area tailplane 18 sq ft
Area elevators 18 sq ft
Area rudder 7 sq ft
Weight 455 lb*
Weight allup 655 lb*
Speed 35-40mph
Price ?650
*Various figures quoted
HOWARD WRIGHT Monoplanes, various types
In January or February 1910, when the representative of The Aero visited the works at Battersea, several aircraft were under construction, whose completion and utilization cannot be established. They were as follows:
'Santos Dumont' type
A slightly larger version of the Demoiselle with a triangular section fuselage of bamboo. It is believed that this machine was completed in 1910.
Power: 30hp Darracq two-cylinder horizontally opposed, water-cooled with 6ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 19ft
Area 120 sq ft
Weight allup 255 lb
Speed 48mph
Length 21ft
'Antoinette' type
A two-seater enlarged version of the Avis was under construction. The wing was completed in a crate and the engine already installed in the fuselage. No record of completion of this machine has been traced.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline, water-cooled
Data
Span 42ft
Area 320 sq ft
Length 40ft
Weight allup 800 1b
'Bleriot XII' type
This machine was described as such from the position of the engine low down in the frame, with the propeller above, driven by a chain. The pilot and passenger sat below the wing behind the engine. The monoplane tail had end elevators and the multisided rudder was similar to that on the Avis.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee
Data
Span 35ft
Area 360 sq ft
Length 46ft
Weight allup 1,100lb
Racing Type biplane
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 36ft
with outer lower panels removed 22ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft
Area 432 sq ft could reduce to 348 sq ft
Length 37ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HOWARD WRIGHT biplane 'Curtiss' type
It was reported that a machine was built in 1910, conforming generally to the design of the American pilot constructor, Glenn Curtiss. Little is recorded, except that the engine was of 35hp driving a pusher propeller, the span was 33ft and the area 270 sqft.
HOWARD WRIGHT biplane
More of the 1910 type biplanes were made than of any other Howard Wright types. In basic design the type resembled a Farman, although the curved ends of the tail booms, an original feature, were changed later. The structure of the aircraft was mostly of mahogany and ash with steel fittings. It had both front and rear interconnected elevators, with a single tall divided rudder. The wings were fabric covered on the lower surfaces only and single acting ailerons were fitted to the top and bottom wings and to the top wing extensions, which were an alternative fitment to some aircraft. These extra ailerons were coupled to the existing controls and could be folded down with the extensions for storage purposes. The undercarriage consisted of twin wheels on separate axles, sprung by rubber cords to the skids, similar springing being used for the tailskid.
The standard machines mostly had the ENV type F water-cooled engine with radiators on each side, the oil tank just above the engine and the fuel tank below the top center section. For long range flights an extra tank replaced the passenger seat, behind the pilot, and both Sopwith and Reynolds, who used the biplane, had fairings fitted in front to protect them from the elements.
The Howard Wright biplane was used by Sopwith for the Baron de Forest Contest at the end of 1910, in which he was successful, with a flight of 169 miles into Belgium.
At the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911, Tom Sopwith's machine was shown on the Aero Club's stand, while the Warwick Wright stand showed a special racing version for Robert Loraine. This had a Gnome engine and reduced wing chord, with ailerons on the top wings only. The outer panels of the lower wings could be removed back as far as the first pair of interplane struts and the overhanging top wing was then braced by wires.
The first of the machines with ENV engines was owned by E.M. Maitland, and was first flown on 1 August 1910 at Larkhill. This resulted in a crash and injury to Maitland. It was repaired and then flown by Watkins, but was later sold to the War Office and identified as serial No.F3. The second machine went to John Done, known as Jack Dare in the theatrical world. The third machine was bought by Tom Sopwith and was used by him very successfully for competition and instructional work.
The fourth aircraft was exported to New Zealand to the Walsh brothers of Auckland where it survived in modified form until December 1913, and the fifth, with the smaller 40hp ENV type D, was exported to Rangoon, Burma for W.C. England in 1912.
The eighth machine was flown by Lt. Reynolds in the Circuit of Britain Contest in July 1911, but he was forced to abandon the flight at Harrogate. This machine may have been fitted with a Green engine at some stage.
The ninth machine went to J.L. Longstaffe, a little known pilot, who made an unsuccessful attempt for the British Empire Michelin Trophy No.2 in October 1911. Grahame-White also purchased a Gnome engined version for use at Hendon.
Power:
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a 8ft 4in diameter
40hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee (one aircraft) propeller.
60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled (one or two aircraft)
Data
Span 36ft (48ft #)
Gap 6ft 6in
Length 36ft 6in
Area (inc. ailerons) 415 sq ft (504 sq ft #*) (532 sq ft #)
Area tailplane 48 sq ft (34 sq ft *)
Area front elevator 27 sq ft (23 1/3 sq ft *)
Area rear elevator 18 sq ft (12 3/4 sq ft *)
Area rudder 15 sq ft
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,2001b
Speed 36-45mph
Endurance 5hr
Price ?1,000
*Alternatives from various sources
#With extensions
It was reported that a machine was built in 1910, conforming generally to the design of the American pilot constructor, Glenn Curtiss. Little is recorded, except that the engine was of 35hp driving a pusher propeller, the span was 33ft and the area 270 sqft.
HOWARD WRIGHT biplane
More of the 1910 type biplanes were made than of any other Howard Wright types. In basic design the type resembled a Farman, although the curved ends of the tail booms, an original feature, were changed later. The structure of the aircraft was mostly of mahogany and ash with steel fittings. It had both front and rear interconnected elevators, with a single tall divided rudder. The wings were fabric covered on the lower surfaces only and single acting ailerons were fitted to the top and bottom wings and to the top wing extensions, which were an alternative fitment to some aircraft. These extra ailerons were coupled to the existing controls and could be folded down with the extensions for storage purposes. The undercarriage consisted of twin wheels on separate axles, sprung by rubber cords to the skids, similar springing being used for the tailskid.
The standard machines mostly had the ENV type F water-cooled engine with radiators on each side, the oil tank just above the engine and the fuel tank below the top center section. For long range flights an extra tank replaced the passenger seat, behind the pilot, and both Sopwith and Reynolds, who used the biplane, had fairings fitted in front to protect them from the elements.
The Howard Wright biplane was used by Sopwith for the Baron de Forest Contest at the end of 1910, in which he was successful, with a flight of 169 miles into Belgium.
At the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911, Tom Sopwith's machine was shown on the Aero Club's stand, while the Warwick Wright stand showed a special racing version for Robert Loraine. This had a Gnome engine and reduced wing chord, with ailerons on the top wings only. The outer panels of the lower wings could be removed back as far as the first pair of interplane struts and the overhanging top wing was then braced by wires.
The first of the machines with ENV engines was owned by E.M. Maitland, and was first flown on 1 August 1910 at Larkhill. This resulted in a crash and injury to Maitland. It was repaired and then flown by Watkins, but was later sold to the War Office and identified as serial No.F3. The second machine went to John Done, known as Jack Dare in the theatrical world. The third machine was bought by Tom Sopwith and was used by him very successfully for competition and instructional work.
The fourth aircraft was exported to New Zealand to the Walsh brothers of Auckland where it survived in modified form until December 1913, and the fifth, with the smaller 40hp ENV type D, was exported to Rangoon, Burma for W.C. England in 1912.
The eighth machine was flown by Lt. Reynolds in the Circuit of Britain Contest in July 1911, but he was forced to abandon the flight at Harrogate. This machine may have been fitted with a Green engine at some stage.
The ninth machine went to J.L. Longstaffe, a little known pilot, who made an unsuccessful attempt for the British Empire Michelin Trophy No.2 in October 1911. Grahame-White also purchased a Gnome engined version for use at Hendon.
Power:
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a 8ft 4in diameter
40hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee (one aircraft) propeller.
60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled (one or two aircraft)
Data
Span 36ft (48ft #)
Gap 6ft 6in
Length 36ft 6in
Area (inc. ailerons) 415 sq ft (504 sq ft #*) (532 sq ft #)
Area tailplane 48 sq ft (34 sq ft *)
Area front elevator 27 sq ft (23 1/3 sq ft *)
Area rear elevator 18 sq ft (12 3/4 sq ft *)
Area rudder 15 sq ft
Weight 800 lb
Weight allup 1,2001b
Speed 36-45mph
Endurance 5hr
Price ?1,000
*Alternatives from various sources
#With extensions
The Howard Wright racing biplane shown at Olympia in 1911 was fitted with a Gnome rotary instead of the usual ENV.
The Howard Wright biplane with which T. O. M. Sopwith won the L4,000 Baron de Forest prize on 18 December, 1910. Tom Sopwith used his Howard Wright biplane very successfully in Britain and America.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HOWARD WRIGHT aircraft (Howard T. Wright Bros. Ltd., Belgravia Chambers, 72 Victoria St., SW1. Works at Prince of Wales Rd., Battersea)
Howard Wright became involved in aeronautical work when working for Hiram Maxim, between 1899 and 1904. In July 1905, together with his brothers Warwick and Walter, the above company was formed, which included the goodwill of Maxim's company. An enquiry from an Italian inventor, Federico Capone, intended for the defunct Maxim company, was received in early 1907 for a helicopter to Capone's own design. The order was concluded and was the start of manufacture of flying machines by Howard Wright.
The manufacture of the helicopter began in November 1907 at the premises of Warwick Wright Ltd. at 110 High St., Marylebone, but was transferred to Battersea under railway arch No.80. Growth of aviation work necessitated further premises and arches Nos.79 and 82 were rented later. The ground used for testing conventional aircraft was Brooklands, where Shed No.9 was in use throughout 1911, until the business was closed. Howard Wright then became the manager of the Coventry Ordnance Works Aviation Dept at the beginning of the following year.
HOWARD WRIGHT-CAPONE helicopters
Capone had made, in Italy, an unmanned helicopter to prove his design of rotors. He then made the enquiry received by Howard Wright for the manufacture of a second machine, which was to be piloted. Patent application 7129, with drawings by Howard Wright, was made in 1908. The machine was completed in March 1908 and taken to Norbury golf course, before being dispatched to Italy. The machine proved to be unsuccessful and a third machine of much lighter weight was commissioned, which was completed and sent to Italy in January 1909. Unmanned tests were made at Naples in October/November 1909, but were inconclusive.
A fourth Capone helicopter was started in June 1909 and was delivered to Italy that year. There is some evidence of a fifth Capone helicopter and an ornithopter being made by Howard Wright.
The helicopters designed by Capone consisted basically of a structure of light gauge steel tube, welded to form a framework with outriggers. At the tips of the outriggers were mounted two-bladed lift rotors, driven through shafts and bevel gearing from the engine mounted across the framework, the pilot being seated immediately behind.
The top surface of the framework was covered with fabric to form a lifting surface in forward flight. Hinged triangular flaps at the tips of the hinged tailplane were to give yaw control, and triangular flaps below the rotors, lateral control, as well as stabilizing the machine on the ground. Large rectangular surfaces, within the main framework, were given a flapping motion by a drive from the engine, to produce a movement of air below the body and assist stability.
Forward motion was imparted to the machine by two four-bladed tractor propellers, driven by bevel gearing from the main rotor shafts. The machine was mounted on four wheels, one of which could be coupled to the rotor drive shaft by chain, to cater for taxiing on the ground. There were six small auxiliary wheels to aid stability on the ground.
The second and third helicopters were similar except that considerable weight was saved in the construction of the latter machine, through the use of a lighter air-cooled power unit and other changes of design. The fan to cool the engine was used for forward motion also, and the undercarriage was reduced to three main wheels.
CAPONE No.2 helicopter
Power: 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving two 4ft 8in diameter propellers
Data
Span over rotors 48ft 2in
Length over rotors 27ft
Wing span/rotor axis 28ft 10in
Max wing chord 11ft 8in
Tailplane span 13ft 2in
Tailplane chord 8ft 2in
Control area 81 sq ft inc. rudders
Wing area 160sqft
Rotor diameter 19ft 4in
Weight allup 1,250lb
Rotor blades 6ft 4in by 2ft 4in
Gliding speed 20mph
CAPONE No.3 helicopter
Power: 30hp REP seven-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type semiradial
Data
Span over rotors 56ft
Wing span/rotor axis 30ft
Weight allup 600 lb
Rotor diameter 26ft
Gliding speed 15mph
Rotor blades 6ft 6in by 3ft
Howard Wright became involved in aeronautical work when working for Hiram Maxim, between 1899 and 1904. In July 1905, together with his brothers Warwick and Walter, the above company was formed, which included the goodwill of Maxim's company. An enquiry from an Italian inventor, Federico Capone, intended for the defunct Maxim company, was received in early 1907 for a helicopter to Capone's own design. The order was concluded and was the start of manufacture of flying machines by Howard Wright.
The manufacture of the helicopter began in November 1907 at the premises of Warwick Wright Ltd. at 110 High St., Marylebone, but was transferred to Battersea under railway arch No.80. Growth of aviation work necessitated further premises and arches Nos.79 and 82 were rented later. The ground used for testing conventional aircraft was Brooklands, where Shed No.9 was in use throughout 1911, until the business was closed. Howard Wright then became the manager of the Coventry Ordnance Works Aviation Dept at the beginning of the following year.
HOWARD WRIGHT-CAPONE helicopters
Capone had made, in Italy, an unmanned helicopter to prove his design of rotors. He then made the enquiry received by Howard Wright for the manufacture of a second machine, which was to be piloted. Patent application 7129, with drawings by Howard Wright, was made in 1908. The machine was completed in March 1908 and taken to Norbury golf course, before being dispatched to Italy. The machine proved to be unsuccessful and a third machine of much lighter weight was commissioned, which was completed and sent to Italy in January 1909. Unmanned tests were made at Naples in October/November 1909, but were inconclusive.
A fourth Capone helicopter was started in June 1909 and was delivered to Italy that year. There is some evidence of a fifth Capone helicopter and an ornithopter being made by Howard Wright.
The helicopters designed by Capone consisted basically of a structure of light gauge steel tube, welded to form a framework with outriggers. At the tips of the outriggers were mounted two-bladed lift rotors, driven through shafts and bevel gearing from the engine mounted across the framework, the pilot being seated immediately behind.
The top surface of the framework was covered with fabric to form a lifting surface in forward flight. Hinged triangular flaps at the tips of the hinged tailplane were to give yaw control, and triangular flaps below the rotors, lateral control, as well as stabilizing the machine on the ground. Large rectangular surfaces, within the main framework, were given a flapping motion by a drive from the engine, to produce a movement of air below the body and assist stability.
Forward motion was imparted to the machine by two four-bladed tractor propellers, driven by bevel gearing from the main rotor shafts. The machine was mounted on four wheels, one of which could be coupled to the rotor drive shaft by chain, to cater for taxiing on the ground. There were six small auxiliary wheels to aid stability on the ground.
The second and third helicopters were similar except that considerable weight was saved in the construction of the latter machine, through the use of a lighter air-cooled power unit and other changes of design. The fan to cool the engine was used for forward motion also, and the undercarriage was reduced to three main wheels.
CAPONE No.2 helicopter
Power: 50hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving two 4ft 8in diameter propellers
Data
Span over rotors 48ft 2in
Length over rotors 27ft
Wing span/rotor axis 28ft 10in
Max wing chord 11ft 8in
Tailplane span 13ft 2in
Tailplane chord 8ft 2in
Control area 81 sq ft inc. rudders
Wing area 160sqft
Rotor diameter 19ft 4in
Weight allup 1,250lb
Rotor blades 6ft 4in by 2ft 4in
Gliding speed 20mph
CAPONE No.3 helicopter
Power: 30hp REP seven-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type semiradial
Data
Span over rotors 56ft
Wing span/rotor axis 30ft
Weight allup 600 lb
Rotor diameter 26ft
Gliding speed 15mph
Rotor blades 6ft 6in by 3ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUMBER biplane 1910 type
This tractor biplane shared the stand at Olympia with the monoplanes in March 1910. It was a side-by-side three seater, with the instructor in the center with overriding control of the pupils controls, which were triplicated.
The uncovered fuselage, which was square in section, tapered down to the tail by curvature of the upper longerons. The structure was of wood and the tail surfaces were similar to those of the Lovelace monoplane.
The wings were spaced by four pairs of interplane struts at the front and rear spars, all being of tubular steel. A wide-track undercarriage, below the longerons, was braced to a pair of outboard struts. The spars were jointed for ease of transport and the trailing edge sections of the wing outer portions were flexible for warping. This machine was probably not flown.
Power: 50hp Humber four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 6ft 11in diameter Humber propeller.
Data
Span 40ft (41ft 6in)*
Chord 6ft 8in
Gap 5ft
Length 33ft (36ft)*
Area 482 sq ft
Area elevators 16 sq ft
Area rudder 12 sq ft
Speed 50mph
Price ?1,000 (?1,100)*
*Alternatives from The Aero
This tractor biplane shared the stand at Olympia with the monoplanes in March 1910. It was a side-by-side three seater, with the instructor in the center with overriding control of the pupils controls, which were triplicated.
The uncovered fuselage, which was square in section, tapered down to the tail by curvature of the upper longerons. The structure was of wood and the tail surfaces were similar to those of the Lovelace monoplane.
The wings were spaced by four pairs of interplane struts at the front and rear spars, all being of tubular steel. A wide-track undercarriage, below the longerons, was braced to a pair of outboard struts. The spars were jointed for ease of transport and the trailing edge sections of the wing outer portions were flexible for warping. This machine was probably not flown.
Power: 50hp Humber four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 6ft 11in diameter Humber propeller.
Data
Span 40ft (41ft 6in)*
Chord 6ft 8in
Gap 5ft
Length 33ft (36ft)*
Area 482 sq ft
Area elevators 16 sq ft
Area rudder 12 sq ft
Speed 50mph
Price ?1,000 (?1,100)*
*Alternatives from The Aero
Humber's first biplane was a side-by-side three-seater for instructional work. At Olympia in March 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUMBER biplane 1910-1911 type
The biplane, shown at Olympia in 1910, was soon replaced by a more normal design of the time based on the French Sommer type, the design being attributed to A.H. Bailey.
The first of these was reported to have flown at Brooklands on 19 October 1910, having been fitted with a Gnome engine as, no doubt, the Humber engine still required development. The machine was packed, together with a second biplane and two monoplanes, and was dispatched to India by early November for demonstrations during an exhibition at Allahabad, in January and February. The team was managed by Capts. W.G. Windham and G. Dawes, with pilots Henri Pequet and Keith Davies, who also carried out pioneering air mail flights. The team was back by April and Pequet flew the Olympia machine at Brooklands for the first time on 6 May 1911 and the following day made a flight of 1hr 10min. Further flight trials of the engine, in a monoplane, took place throughout the summer, but apart from one in a monoplane sold to the Pashley brothers in August, the Humber engine was not generally adopted.
The machine was a typical pusher biplane with front elevator. It had the long curved skids attached to the front elevator supports, associated with the Sommer type. The tailplane was adjustable for incidence, by hand wheel adjacent to the pilot, an unusual feature at the time. The most obvious departure from standard practice, were the side curtains set at an angle between the two planes. These were warpable and were used in conjunction with small semicircular ailerons, positioned inboard of the outer pair of interplane struts, on the top wing. The top wing extensions could be folded down to reduce the span for storage, the side curtains then being folded upwards. Rudders were fitted above and below the tailplane.
Power:
50hp Humber four-cylinder inline, water-cooled with 7ft diameter propeller
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span top. 45ft 8in
Span bottom 33ft 9in
Length 40ft
Chord top 6ft 9in
Chord bottom 6ft 9in tapering to 5ft 9in
Area 506 sq ft
Weight 820 lb
Humber gave up the manufacture of aeroplanes and aero engines in August and sold all their remaining stock by auction on 4 September 1912. The sale included one Bleriot type, four biplanes, three Bleriot fuselages and two Humber Le Blon fuselages. Also a number of aero engines and finished and unfinished parts for aero engines and woodwork and metal parts.
The biplane, shown at Olympia in 1910, was soon replaced by a more normal design of the time based on the French Sommer type, the design being attributed to A.H. Bailey.
The first of these was reported to have flown at Brooklands on 19 October 1910, having been fitted with a Gnome engine as, no doubt, the Humber engine still required development. The machine was packed, together with a second biplane and two monoplanes, and was dispatched to India by early November for demonstrations during an exhibition at Allahabad, in January and February. The team was managed by Capts. W.G. Windham and G. Dawes, with pilots Henri Pequet and Keith Davies, who also carried out pioneering air mail flights. The team was back by April and Pequet flew the Olympia machine at Brooklands for the first time on 6 May 1911 and the following day made a flight of 1hr 10min. Further flight trials of the engine, in a monoplane, took place throughout the summer, but apart from one in a monoplane sold to the Pashley brothers in August, the Humber engine was not generally adopted.
The machine was a typical pusher biplane with front elevator. It had the long curved skids attached to the front elevator supports, associated with the Sommer type. The tailplane was adjustable for incidence, by hand wheel adjacent to the pilot, an unusual feature at the time. The most obvious departure from standard practice, were the side curtains set at an angle between the two planes. These were warpable and were used in conjunction with small semicircular ailerons, positioned inboard of the outer pair of interplane struts, on the top wing. The top wing extensions could be folded down to reduce the span for storage, the side curtains then being folded upwards. Rudders were fitted above and below the tailplane.
Power:
50hp Humber four-cylinder inline, water-cooled with 7ft diameter propeller
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span top. 45ft 8in
Span bottom 33ft 9in
Length 40ft
Chord top 6ft 9in
Chord bottom 6ft 9in tapering to 5ft 9in
Area 506 sq ft
Weight 820 lb
Humber gave up the manufacture of aeroplanes and aero engines in August and sold all their remaining stock by auction on 4 September 1912. The sale included one Bleriot type, four biplanes, three Bleriot fuselages and two Humber Le Blon fuselages. Also a number of aero engines and finished and unfinished parts for aero engines and woodwork and metal parts.
A modified version of the 1910-1911 Humber biplane in India without the top-wing extensions and the sloping side-curtains.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUMBER monoplane (Humber Ltd., Coventry. Flying ground at Brooklands)
Humbers announced their intention to set up an aviation department in September 1909 to produce fifty aeroplanes at ?400 each; this number was not built and by 1912 aircraft manufacture had been discontinued. From early 1910, hangars Nos.4 and 5 were rented at Brooklands for flying operations.
This well established motor company made, as its first product, a monoplane resembling a Bleriot in its general layout, although any connection was denied by the company in the Press. There were differences in detail and the machines were fitted with Humber's own design of three-cylinder engine.
The early tests of Humber monoplanes took place at Cannes in the south of France from 5 January 1910, whence the first two machines had been taken to obtain good flying weather in winter. They were flown by Capt. Dawes and J.V Neale. Dawes took the machines on to Egypt, where one was flown at the Heliopolis Meeting by Frenchman, Le Blon, who gained third place in prize money earnings. In early April Le Blon died in an accident when flying a Bleriot at St. Sebastian in Spain.
Two machines were later at Brooklands, but only began trials in May in the hands of novice pilot G.A. Barnes, with the first public flight taking place on 28 May 1910. The machine was wrecked on 18 June 1910, but Barnes continued on a second machine and took his certificate soon after, later flying at various meetings, including Wolverhampton and Bournemouth. A fuselage with a 50hp. engine was also shown at Olympia in March 1910.
Power:
30hp Humber three-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type semiradial.
50hp Humber four-cylinder inline, water-cooled as in the Lovelace type.
Humbers announced their intention to set up an aviation department in September 1909 to produce fifty aeroplanes at ?400 each; this number was not built and by 1912 aircraft manufacture had been discontinued. From early 1910, hangars Nos.4 and 5 were rented at Brooklands for flying operations.
This well established motor company made, as its first product, a monoplane resembling a Bleriot in its general layout, although any connection was denied by the company in the Press. There were differences in detail and the machines were fitted with Humber's own design of three-cylinder engine.
The early tests of Humber monoplanes took place at Cannes in the south of France from 5 January 1910, whence the first two machines had been taken to obtain good flying weather in winter. They were flown by Capt. Dawes and J.V Neale. Dawes took the machines on to Egypt, where one was flown at the Heliopolis Meeting by Frenchman, Le Blon, who gained third place in prize money earnings. In early April Le Blon died in an accident when flying a Bleriot at St. Sebastian in Spain.
Two machines were later at Brooklands, but only began trials in May in the hands of novice pilot G.A. Barnes, with the first public flight taking place on 28 May 1910. The machine was wrecked on 18 June 1910, but Barnes continued on a second machine and took his certificate soon after, later flying at various meetings, including Wolverhampton and Bournemouth. A fuselage with a 50hp. engine was also shown at Olympia in March 1910.
Power:
30hp Humber three-cylinder air-cooled, fan-type semiradial.
50hp Humber four-cylinder inline, water-cooled as in the Lovelace type.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUMBER monoplane (Le Blon Type)
Hubert Le Blon was a racing motorist who later took to aviation with Leon Delagrange, but was killed in a crash in Spain on 2 April 1910, soon after the machine he designed for Humber was exhibited at the Olympia Show. It embodied a number of original design features but interest in it died with its creator.
The fuselage consisted of a long tapered tube of light wooden monocoque construction covered with fabric. It was small in diameter and the pilot sat outside with his legs straddling the monocoque to operate the rudder bar. The fuselage hung below the wings, which were joined together by tubular center section spars that were integrated to the cabane, the engine mounting and the undercarriage. The main members of the latter were two large diameter shaped steel tubes joined below by a straight cross member, from the ends of which, short laminated springs carried the cross axle and bicycle type wheels. The tail was supported by a long curved ash tail-skid.
The center section of the wings was completely open. The wings themselves were braced with steel tapes and the entire trailing edge portions were hinged to serve the dual purpose of ailerons and camber changing flaps.
The tail unit was comprised of a long tapering fin, with rudder of equispaced areas above and below the fuselage centerline, with a shape that curved forwards at the trailing edge. The tailplane was of the type with end elevators, mounted below the fuselage and could be adjusted for incidence on the ground. The tailplane was itself supplemented by a long tapering extension earned forward below the fuselage.
Power: 30hp Humber three-cylinder air-cooled fan-type semiradial driving a 6ft 6in diameter (6ft 11in)* Chauviere propeller
Data
Span 29ft (29ft 2in)*
Chord 6ft 6in (6ft 10in)*
Length 26ft 8in (24ft)*
Area 192 sq ft (186 sq ft)*
Area tailplane 16 1/2 sq ft plus extension
Area elevators 11 sq ft
Area rudder 6 sq ft (10 sq ft)*
Weight 490 lb (480 lb)*
Price ?480
* Alternatives from The Aero
Hubert Le Blon was a racing motorist who later took to aviation with Leon Delagrange, but was killed in a crash in Spain on 2 April 1910, soon after the machine he designed for Humber was exhibited at the Olympia Show. It embodied a number of original design features but interest in it died with its creator.
The fuselage consisted of a long tapered tube of light wooden monocoque construction covered with fabric. It was small in diameter and the pilot sat outside with his legs straddling the monocoque to operate the rudder bar. The fuselage hung below the wings, which were joined together by tubular center section spars that were integrated to the cabane, the engine mounting and the undercarriage. The main members of the latter were two large diameter shaped steel tubes joined below by a straight cross member, from the ends of which, short laminated springs carried the cross axle and bicycle type wheels. The tail was supported by a long curved ash tail-skid.
The center section of the wings was completely open. The wings themselves were braced with steel tapes and the entire trailing edge portions were hinged to serve the dual purpose of ailerons and camber changing flaps.
The tail unit was comprised of a long tapering fin, with rudder of equispaced areas above and below the fuselage centerline, with a shape that curved forwards at the trailing edge. The tailplane was of the type with end elevators, mounted below the fuselage and could be adjusted for incidence on the ground. The tailplane was itself supplemented by a long tapering extension earned forward below the fuselage.
Power: 30hp Humber three-cylinder air-cooled fan-type semiradial driving a 6ft 6in diameter (6ft 11in)* Chauviere propeller
Data
Span 29ft (29ft 2in)*
Chord 6ft 6in (6ft 10in)*
Length 26ft 8in (24ft)*
Area 192 sq ft (186 sq ft)*
Area tailplane 16 1/2 sq ft plus extension
Area elevators 11 sq ft
Area rudder 6 sq ft (10 sq ft)*
Weight 490 lb (480 lb)*
Price ?480
* Alternatives from The Aero
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUMBER monoplane (Lovelace type)
Capt. T.T. Lovelace was engaged by Humber as designer and pilot, and he produced as his first design a machine which was shown at Olympia in March 1910, before it had flown. Later it was taken to Brooklands, where it was tested by Lovelace who carried out straight flights up to 10ft high on 25 May 1910. One of these resulted in a heavy landing and some damage, the machine being reported as tail heavy.
The aircraft was seemingly evolved from the basic Bleriot XI design, with some changes introduced. It featured a long central skid behind the undercarriage, carrying the warp control on one of its supporting vee struts. There were large swept tail surfaces with trailing curved elevators and a long rudder with a pointed end. The engine was water-cooled with two narrow, vertical radiators at the front.
Power: 50hp Humber four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 33ft (33ft 3in)*
Chord 6ft 10in (6ft.9in.)*
Length 26ft 6in (26ft 8in)*
Area 210 sq ft (232 sq ft)*
Area tailplane 36 sq ft
Area elevators 32 1/2 sq ft
Weight 500 lb
Speed 50mph
Price ?750 (?775)*
*Alternative figures from The Aero
Capt. T.T. Lovelace was engaged by Humber as designer and pilot, and he produced as his first design a machine which was shown at Olympia in March 1910, before it had flown. Later it was taken to Brooklands, where it was tested by Lovelace who carried out straight flights up to 10ft high on 25 May 1910. One of these resulted in a heavy landing and some damage, the machine being reported as tail heavy.
The aircraft was seemingly evolved from the basic Bleriot XI design, with some changes introduced. It featured a long central skid behind the undercarriage, carrying the warp control on one of its supporting vee struts. There were large swept tail surfaces with trailing curved elevators and a long rudder with a pointed end. The engine was water-cooled with two narrow, vertical radiators at the front.
Power: 50hp Humber four-cylinder inline, water-cooled driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 33ft (33ft 3in)*
Chord 6ft 10in (6ft.9in.)*
Length 26ft 6in (26ft 8in)*
Area 210 sq ft (232 sq ft)*
Area tailplane 36 sq ft
Area elevators 32 1/2 sq ft
Weight 500 lb
Speed 50mph
Price ?750 (?775)*
*Alternative figures from The Aero
OLYMPIA, 1910. - The Humber monoplane designed by Capt. Lovelace resembles the Bleriot type, but embodies many different features, notably the tail and the control mechanism.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUMPHREYS gliders (Jack Edmond Humphreys, Wivenhoe, Essex)
Prior to attempting powered flight, Jack Humphreys built three gliders from 1902 onwards, culminating in man carrying flights of up to half a mile from the cliffs at Coombe Farm, Fowey in Cornwall. He made a study of bird flight and based his highlift wing design on that of birds, confirming by practical experiment the airflow and lifting characteristics.
Humphreys withdrew from aviation after the series of mishaps at Brooklands with his No.3 monoplane, and strong criticism voiced in The Aeroplane by C.G. Grey concerning his piloting ability. He was a qualified dental surgeon and returned to this profession establishing a practice in Harley St., London Wl.
HUMPHREYS biplane
The construction of an amphibious biplane was begun in the autumn of 1908 at Forrest's Boatyard, Wivenhoe. It was launched on the River Colne at Rowhedge Ferry Hard in April 1909, but soon sank at its moorings. It had previously been brought to London for exhibition at the Aero Show at Olympia in March but, because of its size, the machine could not pass through the doors. The subsequent trials were unsuccessful and the machine, which became known as the 'Wivenhoe Flyer' in the Press, never did more than just taxiing on the river at speeds up to ten knots.
The biplane wings were widely spaced and curved in shape, with large triangular tip ailerons. The top center section embodied a tapered 'keel', a theory of Humphreys to assist longitudinal stability. A triangular front elevator and flexible tailplane, with rudder above, were fitted at the rear of the machine. The tailplane was fixed but could be operated differentially in conjunction with the ailerons.
The engine was mounted across the center on bearers, at midgap, and drove twin pusher propellers through shafts and bevel gearing. A four wheeled chassis, which could be folded up, was incorporated, but probably not fitted for the trials on water. The machine floated on an open central hull and tip floats, mounted on the lower wings.
Steel tube was used for the main frame with wood in the structure of the lower wing, tail and supports for the front elevator. The mainplanes and fin were covered with thin aluminum sheet, the rest of the surfaces were fabric covered.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving two counter rotating 8ft diameter steel bladed propellers at 400 rpm
Data
Span 45ft
Hull 12ft 6in by 8ft beam
Tip floats 6ft by 1ft 6in beam
Chord 13ft
Length 38ft
Area 650 sq ft *
Weight allup 1,750lb
*Area uncertain but claimed loading of 1 lb per sq ft does not seem feasible
Prior to attempting powered flight, Jack Humphreys built three gliders from 1902 onwards, culminating in man carrying flights of up to half a mile from the cliffs at Coombe Farm, Fowey in Cornwall. He made a study of bird flight and based his highlift wing design on that of birds, confirming by practical experiment the airflow and lifting characteristics.
Humphreys withdrew from aviation after the series of mishaps at Brooklands with his No.3 monoplane, and strong criticism voiced in The Aeroplane by C.G. Grey concerning his piloting ability. He was a qualified dental surgeon and returned to this profession establishing a practice in Harley St., London Wl.
HUMPHREYS biplane
The construction of an amphibious biplane was begun in the autumn of 1908 at Forrest's Boatyard, Wivenhoe. It was launched on the River Colne at Rowhedge Ferry Hard in April 1909, but soon sank at its moorings. It had previously been brought to London for exhibition at the Aero Show at Olympia in March but, because of its size, the machine could not pass through the doors. The subsequent trials were unsuccessful and the machine, which became known as the 'Wivenhoe Flyer' in the Press, never did more than just taxiing on the river at speeds up to ten knots.
The biplane wings were widely spaced and curved in shape, with large triangular tip ailerons. The top center section embodied a tapered 'keel', a theory of Humphreys to assist longitudinal stability. A triangular front elevator and flexible tailplane, with rudder above, were fitted at the rear of the machine. The tailplane was fixed but could be operated differentially in conjunction with the ailerons.
The engine was mounted across the center on bearers, at midgap, and drove twin pusher propellers through shafts and bevel gearing. A four wheeled chassis, which could be folded up, was incorporated, but probably not fitted for the trials on water. The machine floated on an open central hull and tip floats, mounted on the lower wings.
Steel tube was used for the main frame with wood in the structure of the lower wing, tail and supports for the front elevator. The mainplanes and fin were covered with thin aluminum sheet, the rest of the surfaces were fabric covered.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving two counter rotating 8ft diameter steel bladed propellers at 400 rpm
Data
Span 45ft
Hull 12ft 6in by 8ft beam
Tip floats 6ft by 1ft 6in beam
Chord 13ft
Length 38ft
Area 650 sq ft *
Weight allup 1,750lb
*Area uncertain but claimed loading of 1 lb per sq ft does not seem feasible
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUMPHREYS monoplane No.l (British Aeroplane Syndicate Ltd., 80 Brook St., London W. Works at Wivenhoe.)
In 1909 Humphreys decided to raise funds to form a company, and took full page advertisements in the aviation press for the purpose in May and June. The syndicate formed following this, being advertised for the first time in The Aero on 22 June 1909, but the advertising faded away by the end of August. However, Humphreys had somehow financed the building of a monoplane, with the declared intention of competing for the Daily Mail prize of .1,000 for a flight of one mile by an all-British aircraft. This he attempted on unsuitable ground at Rowhedge near Wivenhoe on 16 October 1909 and the machine was wrecked when it hit a drainage ditch.
No data exists for the monoplane, other than that which can be deduced from a surviving photograph. It was a tractor type and had a triangular section fuselage, apparently made of tube, with a pylon above to carry a streamlined fuel tank, bracing wires and warping controls. The tubular undercarriage structure extended rearwards, terminating in a large sprung tailwheel, the structure also providing anchorages for bracing cables.
The wings were deeply cambered and curved downwards, and the leading edge curved back to the trailing edge tips. The lateral control surfaces were wide chord flaps hinged behind the trailing edges. The tailplane was of considerable size and probably contributed lift. The pilot was seated well aft, an indication of the effect of the sweep-back and distribution of lift. The rudder, below the tailplane, was rectangular in shape and emblazoned with the Union Jack over the whole surface. The original engine, a 35hp JAP, was fitted with a clutch and extension shaft for the propeller, but was replaced by the new 50hp Green.
The machine was transported to the Bournemouth Meeting in July 1910, where it arrived dismantled on horse and cart transport, on the fourth day of the meeting, 21 October 1909, but it did not perform.
HUMPHREYS monoplane No.2 (Wivenhoe and Brooklands Hangar No.10)
This machine was considerably different from No.l, although the fuselage, which was covered, was still triangular in section and again fitted with the 50hp Green, driving the tractor propeller by clutch and extension shaft. Later these were removed and the propeller was fitted direct to the crankshaft. The original undercarriage was similar to that of an Antoinette, with a central sprung strut, using tension springs. A single front skid was fitted. This was later replaced by one of A type with two pairs of wheels, and a larger elevator was also fitted.
Long tapered fins were fitted above and below the fuselage; a skid supported the tail. The wings had curved leading edges, but less sweep-back to the trailing edges; they were braced by kingposts and did not droop as on No. 1. Lateral control was by warping the wings, which were cut away at the center section to allow access to the cockpit.
This is the machine described in The Aero as the 'earlier version' and presumably is that shown in the only remaining photograph taken at Forrest's Boatyard. The machine, with its wing span of 48ft, was the largest at Brooklands at the time, and became known as the 'Elephant'. It appeared for a test flight on 9 October 1910 in the hands of Humphreys, but it fell over to one side on take off and was damaged. It was tried again at Abbey Fields Colchester on 5 November 1919 but did no more than taxi.
In 1909 Humphreys decided to raise funds to form a company, and took full page advertisements in the aviation press for the purpose in May and June. The syndicate formed following this, being advertised for the first time in The Aero on 22 June 1909, but the advertising faded away by the end of August. However, Humphreys had somehow financed the building of a monoplane, with the declared intention of competing for the Daily Mail prize of .1,000 for a flight of one mile by an all-British aircraft. This he attempted on unsuitable ground at Rowhedge near Wivenhoe on 16 October 1909 and the machine was wrecked when it hit a drainage ditch.
No data exists for the monoplane, other than that which can be deduced from a surviving photograph. It was a tractor type and had a triangular section fuselage, apparently made of tube, with a pylon above to carry a streamlined fuel tank, bracing wires and warping controls. The tubular undercarriage structure extended rearwards, terminating in a large sprung tailwheel, the structure also providing anchorages for bracing cables.
The wings were deeply cambered and curved downwards, and the leading edge curved back to the trailing edge tips. The lateral control surfaces were wide chord flaps hinged behind the trailing edges. The tailplane was of considerable size and probably contributed lift. The pilot was seated well aft, an indication of the effect of the sweep-back and distribution of lift. The rudder, below the tailplane, was rectangular in shape and emblazoned with the Union Jack over the whole surface. The original engine, a 35hp JAP, was fitted with a clutch and extension shaft for the propeller, but was replaced by the new 50hp Green.
The machine was transported to the Bournemouth Meeting in July 1910, where it arrived dismantled on horse and cart transport, on the fourth day of the meeting, 21 October 1909, but it did not perform.
HUMPHREYS monoplane No.2 (Wivenhoe and Brooklands Hangar No.10)
This machine was considerably different from No.l, although the fuselage, which was covered, was still triangular in section and again fitted with the 50hp Green, driving the tractor propeller by clutch and extension shaft. Later these were removed and the propeller was fitted direct to the crankshaft. The original undercarriage was similar to that of an Antoinette, with a central sprung strut, using tension springs. A single front skid was fitted. This was later replaced by one of A type with two pairs of wheels, and a larger elevator was also fitted.
Long tapered fins were fitted above and below the fuselage; a skid supported the tail. The wings had curved leading edges, but less sweep-back to the trailing edges; they were braced by kingposts and did not droop as on No. 1. Lateral control was by warping the wings, which were cut away at the center section to allow access to the cockpit.
This is the machine described in The Aero as the 'earlier version' and presumably is that shown in the only remaining photograph taken at Forrest's Boatyard. The machine, with its wing span of 48ft, was the largest at Brooklands at the time, and became known as the 'Elephant'. It appeared for a test flight on 9 October 1910 in the hands of Humphreys, but it fell over to one side on take off and was damaged. It was tried again at Abbey Fields Colchester on 5 November 1919 but did no more than taxi.
Humphreys monoplane No.l, also built by Forrester's boatyard at Wivenhoe, was probably not completed.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUMPHREYS monoplane. No.3
A report in February described the naming ceremony of a 'new machine' by the Hon. Mrs. Assheton-Harbord, who christened it 'Mary' in honor of the new Queen on 4 February 1911 at Brooklands. Although described as new, the machine may well have been a reconstruction of its predecessor.
This machine was totally different from No.2 but still retained the triangular section fuselage and Green engine mounted on the top longerons. The undercarriage was of Antoinette type with a central sprung strut. Long tapered fins and small triangular rudders were fitted above and below the fuselage and a skid supported the tail. The wings had curved leading edges but little sweep-back to the trailing edges; they were braced by kingposts and had little anhedral.
In May and June, Humphreys was reported to be taking lessons at the Hanriot School. The monoplane, described in Flight as of 'Bleriot type', was not reported out until 30 August 1911, when Humphreys took off, but overcorrected at 10ft from the ground and the aircraft was severely damaged in the ensuing crash.
A major repair took place and subsequently Gordon Bell tested the machine on 12 December 1911 when it was reported to lift rapidly at half throttle, indicating tail heaviness. To correct the balance, flights were made with one and two passengers. By now the undercarriage was replaced by a Farman type structure with 'A' frames and two pairs of wheels and skids. Large diagonal radiators were attached to each side on the undercarriage struts and a larger elevator was fitted. The rear fuselage was now uncovered.
On 16 January 1912 Humphreys' mechanic was seriously hurt in a propeller swinging accident. Dual ignition was fitted and one switch must have remained on. Straight flights were made on the 20-21 January 1912, by a pilot named Hunter, who again flew the machine to test a new Regy propeller fitted to the 60hp Green. On 12 May 1912, after taxiing towards the sheds, Humphreys carelessly crashed into the Hewlett & Blondeau school machine, wrecking it completely.
The No.3 monoplane seems to have been built at Wivenhoe and the photograph of the original version was taken inside a shed at Forrest's Boatyard.
A report in February described the naming ceremony of a 'new machine' by the Hon. Mrs. Assheton-Harbord, who christened it 'Mary' in honor of the new Queen on 4 February 1911 at Brooklands. Although described as new, the machine may well have been a reconstruction of its predecessor.
This machine was totally different from No.2 but still retained the triangular section fuselage and Green engine mounted on the top longerons. The undercarriage was of Antoinette type with a central sprung strut. Long tapered fins and small triangular rudders were fitted above and below the fuselage and a skid supported the tail. The wings had curved leading edges but little sweep-back to the trailing edges; they were braced by kingposts and had little anhedral.
In May and June, Humphreys was reported to be taking lessons at the Hanriot School. The monoplane, described in Flight as of 'Bleriot type', was not reported out until 30 August 1911, when Humphreys took off, but overcorrected at 10ft from the ground and the aircraft was severely damaged in the ensuing crash.
A major repair took place and subsequently Gordon Bell tested the machine on 12 December 1911 when it was reported to lift rapidly at half throttle, indicating tail heaviness. To correct the balance, flights were made with one and two passengers. By now the undercarriage was replaced by a Farman type structure with 'A' frames and two pairs of wheels and skids. Large diagonal radiators were attached to each side on the undercarriage struts and a larger elevator was fitted. The rear fuselage was now uncovered.
On 16 January 1912 Humphreys' mechanic was seriously hurt in a propeller swinging accident. Dual ignition was fitted and one switch must have remained on. Straight flights were made on the 20-21 January 1912, by a pilot named Hunter, who again flew the machine to test a new Regy propeller fitted to the 60hp Green. On 12 May 1912, after taxiing towards the sheds, Humphreys carelessly crashed into the Hewlett & Blondeau school machine, wrecking it completely.
The No.3 monoplane seems to have been built at Wivenhoe and the photograph of the original version was taken inside a shed at Forrest's Boatyard.
Humphreys monoplane No.3 with modified undercarriage and radiators. Was tested at Brooklands and took off with three people aboard.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
HUTTON & WILSON monoplane. (Filey, Yorkshire)
A tractor monoplane with 35hp Alvaston engine, built by two Irishmen, was reported ready for testing in August 1910. No further information was recorded.
A tractor monoplane with 35hp Alvaston engine, built by two Irishmen, was reported ready for testing in August 1910. No further information was recorded.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
JAMES Bros., No.l and 2 biplanes (Henry Howard and John Herbert James, Narberth, Pembrokeshire)
The James brothers built a Caudron type C single-seater biplane with a 45hp Anzani engine, in the second half of 1913. It was the younger brother, Herbert, who was flying the machine on its initial flight on 25 September 1913, when it crashed on test at Clynderwen. Although considerable damage was done, it was repairable and Herbert suffered only minor injuries.
The aircraft, which was built with a single rudder, had carried 'James Bros. No. 1' on both the rudder and the lower wings. When the aircraft was rebuilt as No.2 it was a two-seater with the later Caudron-type twin triangular rudders, and small fixed fins and was unmarked. Herbert flew it again in this form on 22 November 1913, but damaged the propeller on landing. It was not until 20 April 1914 that flying recommenced, with increasing success until the outbreak of war.
The brothers had originally become involved in aviation by an apprenticeship with the Gloucester firm of Webb, Peat & Co. which was terminated with the liquidation of that firm. Thereafter they enrolled with the International Correspondence School, to study aeronautical theory, and moved to Hendon for flying tuition, both receiving their Aviation Certificates in October 1912. They continued at the Ewen School as instructors, until returning to Wales, in the summer of 1913, to build the aircraft at Narberth, where, in July 1914, they planned to operate a small aircraft factory. A monoplane was in course of design but this, and the factory scheme, were discontinued with the outbreak of war. The biplane was moved to the Ruffy Baumann School in February 1915, and the brothers spent until the end of 1915 instructing at Hendon.
Howard spent the first half of 1916 with the RNAS, and was then transferred to Farnborough, where Herbert was already engaged as a civilian test pilot, both becoming commissioned in the Special Reserve of the RFC in March 1917. The older brother crashed badly in December 1917 and was invalided out of the RAF in October 1918. The younger brother continued to fly after the war, becoming a famous test and competition pilot for Nieuport and General Aviation Co., and later for Gloster and the Air Navigation and Engineering Co. (ANEC). He served in the RAF in a non-flying capacity in World War II, but died in February 1944 while still serving.
The James brothers built a Caudron type C single-seater biplane with a 45hp Anzani engine, in the second half of 1913. It was the younger brother, Herbert, who was flying the machine on its initial flight on 25 September 1913, when it crashed on test at Clynderwen. Although considerable damage was done, it was repairable and Herbert suffered only minor injuries.
The aircraft, which was built with a single rudder, had carried 'James Bros. No. 1' on both the rudder and the lower wings. When the aircraft was rebuilt as No.2 it was a two-seater with the later Caudron-type twin triangular rudders, and small fixed fins and was unmarked. Herbert flew it again in this form on 22 November 1913, but damaged the propeller on landing. It was not until 20 April 1914 that flying recommenced, with increasing success until the outbreak of war.
The brothers had originally become involved in aviation by an apprenticeship with the Gloucester firm of Webb, Peat & Co. which was terminated with the liquidation of that firm. Thereafter they enrolled with the International Correspondence School, to study aeronautical theory, and moved to Hendon for flying tuition, both receiving their Aviation Certificates in October 1912. They continued at the Ewen School as instructors, until returning to Wales, in the summer of 1913, to build the aircraft at Narberth, where, in July 1914, they planned to operate a small aircraft factory. A monoplane was in course of design but this, and the factory scheme, were discontinued with the outbreak of war. The biplane was moved to the Ruffy Baumann School in February 1915, and the brothers spent until the end of 1915 instructing at Hendon.
Howard spent the first half of 1916 with the RNAS, and was then transferred to Farnborough, where Herbert was already engaged as a civilian test pilot, both becoming commissioned in the Special Reserve of the RFC in March 1917. The older brother crashed badly in December 1917 and was invalided out of the RAF in October 1918. The younger brother continued to fly after the war, becoming a famous test and competition pilot for Nieuport and General Aviation Co., and later for Gloster and the Air Navigation and Engineering Co. (ANEC). He served in the RAF in a non-flying capacity in World War II, but died in February 1944 while still serving.
The James brothers of Narberth built this Caudron Type C in 1913 and later rebuilt it as a two-seater.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
JAMOGOCHIAN cycloplane (M.A. Jamogochian)
This cycle plane was designed in 1910 and consisted of a parasol front wing and biplane rear wings mounted on a bicycle. A front mounted propeller was driven by the pedals via a chain and bevel gear. A rudder was attached to an outrigger at the rear and was connected to the front wheel so that movement of the handlebars gave lateral control. The front wing was fitted with an elevator which was controlled by a lever attached to the crossbar.
Data
Front wing 10ft x 4ft
Top rear wing 10ft x 4ft
Bottom rear wing 10ft x 3ft
Total wing area 110 sq ft
Empty weight c 100 lb
This cycle plane was designed in 1910 and consisted of a parasol front wing and biplane rear wings mounted on a bicycle. A front mounted propeller was driven by the pedals via a chain and bevel gear. A rudder was attached to an outrigger at the rear and was connected to the front wheel so that movement of the handlebars gave lateral control. The front wing was fitted with an elevator which was controlled by a lever attached to the crossbar.
Data
Front wing 10ft x 4ft
Top rear wing 10ft x 4ft
Bottom rear wing 10ft x 3ft
Total wing area 110 sq ft
Empty weight c 100 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
JAP-HARDING monoplane (J.A. Prestwich & Co., Tottenham, London, N)
This well known manufacturer of motorcycle engines also produced light aero engines and, in 1910, built a monoplane fitted with one for demonstration purposes, to be flown by H.J. Harding, their Paris representative. The machine made its first flight on 10 April 1910 at Tottenham Marshes, but thereafter was taken to Amberieu in France, where Harding learnt to fly it, before returning to England without his pilot's certificate, due to a misunderstanding. He was thus unable to compete at Blackpool or Lanark in August.
The machine was generally similar to a Bleriot except for wings fitted with ailerons, hinged on the trailing edge, which were replaced in France with Bleriot type warping wings. Harding subsequently obtained his certificate and continued to fly the machine from Tottenham during the rest of the season. It was later handed over to the Science Museum, where it is still exhibited.
Power: 40hp JAP eight-cylinder, air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 10in diameter JAP propeller
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 6ft 9in
Length 27ft
Area 190 sq ft (230 sq ft later)
Area tailplane 16 1/2 sq ft
Area elevators 7 1/2 sq ft
Weight 510lb
Speed 50 mph
This well known manufacturer of motorcycle engines also produced light aero engines and, in 1910, built a monoplane fitted with one for demonstration purposes, to be flown by H.J. Harding, their Paris representative. The machine made its first flight on 10 April 1910 at Tottenham Marshes, but thereafter was taken to Amberieu in France, where Harding learnt to fly it, before returning to England without his pilot's certificate, due to a misunderstanding. He was thus unable to compete at Blackpool or Lanark in August.
The machine was generally similar to a Bleriot except for wings fitted with ailerons, hinged on the trailing edge, which were replaced in France with Bleriot type warping wings. Harding subsequently obtained his certificate and continued to fly the machine from Tottenham during the rest of the season. It was later handed over to the Science Museum, where it is still exhibited.
Power: 40hp JAP eight-cylinder, air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 10in diameter JAP propeller
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 6ft 9in
Length 27ft
Area 190 sq ft (230 sq ft later)
Area tailplane 16 1/2 sq ft
Area elevators 7 1/2 sq ft
Weight 510lb
Speed 50 mph
Harding in full flight on his J.A.P. monoplane at Blackpool. The JAP Harding monoplane was later fitted with warping wings without ailerons.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
JEZZI No.1 biplane (P.G. Leo Jezzi, Shawfield Park, Bromley, Kent)
Construction of this machine was begun in 1909 in conjunction with Arthur Cooper, and it was moved to Eastchurch for assembly in January 1910, where successful flights were made by the following August. Aviation was a spare time occupation for Jezzi, who was employed in the City of London.
The machine was similar in layout to the Wright biplane, having twin pusher propellers driven by chains from the engine, which was mounted on the lower center section with the pilot seated in front. A small propeller for cooling was driven from the front of the engine. The three bay wings had warping sections, which extended beyond the chord, and were separated from the main wing by a gap at the inboard end. Fixed fins were built onto the rear outboard interplane struts, which were wide and of streamlined section.
The tail booms, of light tubular construction, carried a fixed, high mounted tailplane with twin rudders below. The front structure of heavier tubular members incorporated twin skids and carried a biplane elevator, with twin rudders between them, coupled to work with those at the back. The undercarriage consisted of two main wheels below the center section.
The biplane, although performing well, was capable of improvement and was converted to a twin tractor type; it flew in this form for the first time on 12 November 1910. The engine had been moved forward and reversed with the pilot repositioned behind. The front elevator and rudder, together with their supporting structure, were removed and a rear mounted elevator was fitted. The balance of the machine having changed, it now rested on a skid behind the tail booms.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder, air-cooled vee driving twin propellers by chain
Construction of this machine was begun in 1909 in conjunction with Arthur Cooper, and it was moved to Eastchurch for assembly in January 1910, where successful flights were made by the following August. Aviation was a spare time occupation for Jezzi, who was employed in the City of London.
The machine was similar in layout to the Wright biplane, having twin pusher propellers driven by chains from the engine, which was mounted on the lower center section with the pilot seated in front. A small propeller for cooling was driven from the front of the engine. The three bay wings had warping sections, which extended beyond the chord, and were separated from the main wing by a gap at the inboard end. Fixed fins were built onto the rear outboard interplane struts, which were wide and of streamlined section.
The tail booms, of light tubular construction, carried a fixed, high mounted tailplane with twin rudders below. The front structure of heavier tubular members incorporated twin skids and carried a biplane elevator, with twin rudders between them, coupled to work with those at the back. The undercarriage consisted of two main wheels below the center section.
The biplane, although performing well, was capable of improvement and was converted to a twin tractor type; it flew in this form for the first time on 12 November 1910. The engine had been moved forward and reversed with the pilot repositioned behind. The front elevator and rudder, together with their supporting structure, were removed and a rear mounted elevator was fitted. The balance of the machine having changed, it now rested on a skid behind the tail booms.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder, air-cooled vee driving twin propellers by chain
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
JEZZI No.2 biplane
Jezzi discarded his first biplane, replacing it with No.2, which appeared in September 1911 at Eastchurch, where he ran it at high speed on the ground to test features of the machine, which was still incomplete and uncovered. On 13 January 1912, it was reported that he used the machine to tow the Brocklehurst monoplane back to the hangar, after it was stranded on the airfield. The machine had been covered by the end of November.
The first flight of No.2 is not recorded, but by 10 March 1912 he had already flown and carried several passengers. The machine had been modified by August 1912, by the addition of extensions to the lower wings, making the wings of equal span. In this form Jezzi used the machine continuously at weekends throughout 1912. As an amateur designer and constructor with limited time and resources, Jezzi made a machine which was fast, very reliable and served him well.
The design was of a simple tractor two-seater, with tapering wooden fuselage girder, mounted on struts between the wings. The top wing had considerable overhang when the machine was originally built as a single bay biplane, with strut and kingpost bracing of the overhanging portion, which was flexible for warping of the inversely tapered trailing edges. The struts and kingposts were removed when the machine was converted to a two bay biplane.
A streamlined headrest was provided behind the pilot, and streamlined fairings were added to the supporting struts for the fuselage and undercarriage. In addition to twin skids on the main two wheel undercarriage, the axle of which was sprung by rubber bands, twin tail skids and skids, below the first interplane struts, were provided, all of which were laminated springs. There was a balanced rudder, but no fin, and a tailplane with divided elevators, all of which were parallel and square ended.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder, air-cooled vee, driving a 7ft 8in diameter tractor propeller
Data
Span top 28ft After conversion 27ft 7in
Span bottom 14ft After conversion 27ft 7in
Chord. 4ft
Gap 5ft
Length 24ft 6in
Area 166 sq ft After conversion 220 sq ft
Area tailplane 10 sq ft
Area elevators 15 sq ft
Area rudder 9 sq ft
Speed 65 mph
Jezzi discarded his first biplane, replacing it with No.2, which appeared in September 1911 at Eastchurch, where he ran it at high speed on the ground to test features of the machine, which was still incomplete and uncovered. On 13 January 1912, it was reported that he used the machine to tow the Brocklehurst monoplane back to the hangar, after it was stranded on the airfield. The machine had been covered by the end of November.
The first flight of No.2 is not recorded, but by 10 March 1912 he had already flown and carried several passengers. The machine had been modified by August 1912, by the addition of extensions to the lower wings, making the wings of equal span. In this form Jezzi used the machine continuously at weekends throughout 1912. As an amateur designer and constructor with limited time and resources, Jezzi made a machine which was fast, very reliable and served him well.
The design was of a simple tractor two-seater, with tapering wooden fuselage girder, mounted on struts between the wings. The top wing had considerable overhang when the machine was originally built as a single bay biplane, with strut and kingpost bracing of the overhanging portion, which was flexible for warping of the inversely tapered trailing edges. The struts and kingposts were removed when the machine was converted to a two bay biplane.
A streamlined headrest was provided behind the pilot, and streamlined fairings were added to the supporting struts for the fuselage and undercarriage. In addition to twin skids on the main two wheel undercarriage, the axle of which was sprung by rubber bands, twin tail skids and skids, below the first interplane struts, were provided, all of which were laminated springs. There was a balanced rudder, but no fin, and a tailplane with divided elevators, all of which were parallel and square ended.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder, air-cooled vee, driving a 7ft 8in diameter tractor propeller
Data
Span top 28ft After conversion 27ft 7in
Span bottom 14ft After conversion 27ft 7in
Chord. 4ft
Gap 5ft
Length 24ft 6in
Area 166 sq ft After conversion 220 sq ft
Area tailplane 10 sq ft
Area elevators 15 sq ft
Area rudder 9 sq ft
Speed 65 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
KEITH-WEISS Aviette (Alexander Keith and Jose Weiss)
Weiss (q.v.) was an artist who had experimented with gliders and powered aircraft since 1902, before he collaborated with Keith, an elderly Scotsman with knowledge of the functioning of birds in flight. The partners designed an ornithopter, the wings of which were actuated by foot pedals. The wings were retained in the normal position by springs, but were given a propelling beat of three feet, when activated.
The machine was tested as a glider, with ballast, at Amberley Mount, Sussex in the summer of 1912.
Data
Span 23ft
Length 19ft
Area 80 sq ft
Weight 95 lb
Weight loaded 230 lb
Est. speed 30 mph
Weiss (q.v.) was an artist who had experimented with gliders and powered aircraft since 1902, before he collaborated with Keith, an elderly Scotsman with knowledge of the functioning of birds in flight. The partners designed an ornithopter, the wings of which were actuated by foot pedals. The wings were retained in the normal position by springs, but were given a propelling beat of three feet, when activated.
The machine was tested as a glider, with ballast, at Amberley Mount, Sussex in the summer of 1912.
Data
Span 23ft
Length 19ft
Area 80 sq ft
Weight 95 lb
Weight loaded 230 lb
Est. speed 30 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
KING monoplane (Alec or Alick King, Kessingland, Suffolk)
This machine was built in 1908-1909 at Kessingland, and was tested on Benacre Denes, where it lifted off and was then damaged by running into a bank of earth. After repair it was removed, in October 1909, the few miles inland to Beccles Common, where Capt. Sanders proposed to fly and to build a hangar. The King monoplane was housed in a tent but was wrecked when this was blown down during a gale and was not rebuilt.
The aircraft had some similarity to a Howard Wright monoplane, but with a Bleriot type undercarriage with cycle wheels. The machine had a fuselage structure made of bamboo, which was parallel in elevation, but tapered in plan to the vertical sternpost. To this was attached the rudder, a light five sided unit with wire boundaries; there was no fixed fin. The tailplane with Bleriot-like end elevators, was fixed ahead of the rudder to the lower longerons.
The wings were of parallel section with square tips, and with spars in a diamond pattern. They were braced by cables and kingposts to the undercarriage and fuselage pylon, which also served to provide a pivot point for the warping control cables, which apparently warped the leading edge.
The sides of the center fuselage were fabric covered; the rear fuselage and engine bay were uncovered. The engine itself is believed to have been made by a local man named Talbot and was a horizontally opposed, air-cooled type of fourcylinders, although other reports referred to a three-cylinder engine.
This machine was built in 1908-1909 at Kessingland, and was tested on Benacre Denes, where it lifted off and was then damaged by running into a bank of earth. After repair it was removed, in October 1909, the few miles inland to Beccles Common, where Capt. Sanders proposed to fly and to build a hangar. The King monoplane was housed in a tent but was wrecked when this was blown down during a gale and was not rebuilt.
The aircraft had some similarity to a Howard Wright monoplane, but with a Bleriot type undercarriage with cycle wheels. The machine had a fuselage structure made of bamboo, which was parallel in elevation, but tapered in plan to the vertical sternpost. To this was attached the rudder, a light five sided unit with wire boundaries; there was no fixed fin. The tailplane with Bleriot-like end elevators, was fixed ahead of the rudder to the lower longerons.
The wings were of parallel section with square tips, and with spars in a diamond pattern. They were braced by cables and kingposts to the undercarriage and fuselage pylon, which also served to provide a pivot point for the warping control cables, which apparently warped the leading edge.
The sides of the center fuselage were fabric covered; the rear fuselage and engine bay were uncovered. The engine itself is believed to have been made by a local man named Talbot and was a horizontally opposed, air-cooled type of fourcylinders, although other reports referred to a three-cylinder engine.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
KITCHEN annular biplane (John George Aulsebrook Kitchen, Scotforth, Lancashire)
Kitchen patented ideas for circular winged aircraft, with special aerodynamic features in 1910 and 1912. A biplane based on his theories was built in 1910 and housed at Famine Point near Heysham, Lancashire. The machine may have been tested, but did not fly before it was purchased at the end of 1910 by Cedric Lee, a wealthy engineer and textile manufacturer from Manchester. He was joined by G. Tilghman Richards, an engineer and member of Manchester Aero Club.
A period of testing and modification, to incorporate some of Richards' ideas ended with the machine overturning in a ditch and finally being destroyed, while under repair, on 15 November 1911, when a gale blew down the hangar. Thereafter the experiments were conducted with models and a full size glider, to test the conflicting views of Kitchen and Richards.
The Kitchen biplane was basically of nacelle and boom type, the uncovered nacelle housing the pilot with the motor mounted on the front, was suspended between the front center section of the wings. The two tail booms were unusual, being constructed with curved vertical members, and carried a pair of rudders and a single tailplane, behind the top wing. The undercarriage had a wide track and had twin skids and four wheels.
The circular wings with central aperture, were built with ribs fore and aft and were attached to inner and outer boundary members. The wings were spaced by a pair of interplane struts each side, together with pairs of diagonal struts connected to the lower longerons. Single-acting ailerons hung on the front interplane struts. The engine was a 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Kitchen patented ideas for circular winged aircraft, with special aerodynamic features in 1910 and 1912. A biplane based on his theories was built in 1910 and housed at Famine Point near Heysham, Lancashire. The machine may have been tested, but did not fly before it was purchased at the end of 1910 by Cedric Lee, a wealthy engineer and textile manufacturer from Manchester. He was joined by G. Tilghman Richards, an engineer and member of Manchester Aero Club.
A period of testing and modification, to incorporate some of Richards' ideas ended with the machine overturning in a ditch and finally being destroyed, while under repair, on 15 November 1911, when a gale blew down the hangar. Thereafter the experiments were conducted with models and a full size glider, to test the conflicting views of Kitchen and Richards.
The Kitchen biplane was basically of nacelle and boom type, the uncovered nacelle housing the pilot with the motor mounted on the front, was suspended between the front center section of the wings. The two tail booms were unusual, being constructed with curved vertical members, and carried a pair of rudders and a single tailplane, behind the top wing. The undercarriage had a wide track and had twin skids and four wheels.
The circular wings with central aperture, were built with ribs fore and aft and were attached to inner and outer boundary members. The wings were spaced by a pair of interplane struts each side, together with pairs of diagonal struts connected to the lower longerons. Single-acting ailerons hung on the front interplane struts. The engine was a 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
KITCHEN-LEE-RICHARDS annular glider
A full size glider biplane, with a circular lower wing and an upper wing of tapered form, was built in January 1912 for testing Kitchen's theories. The trials carried out at Sellet Banks, near Kirby Lonsdale, using a 52ft long launching track and pylon, with weight and cable system, similar to the system employed by the Wright brothers.
The pilot was seated in the center of the aperture on a simple fuselage, to which the circular edge members of the wing were rigidly attached. The upper wing was mounted on a pylon above the fuselage and on single pairs of interplane struts. The elevators, inset into the lower wing, trailed behind the wing profile.
Changes were made to the glider, which was tested in three basic forms until the end of 1912, when Kitchen's ideas were discounted and Lee and Richards moved to London to continue their work (q.v.).
Data
Span 22ft
Area 400 sq ft
Weight 215 lb
Weight allup 385 1b
Speed 22mph
A full size glider biplane, with a circular lower wing and an upper wing of tapered form, was built in January 1912 for testing Kitchen's theories. The trials carried out at Sellet Banks, near Kirby Lonsdale, using a 52ft long launching track and pylon, with weight and cable system, similar to the system employed by the Wright brothers.
The pilot was seated in the center of the aperture on a simple fuselage, to which the circular edge members of the wing were rigidly attached. The upper wing was mounted on a pylon above the fuselage and on single pairs of interplane struts. The elevators, inset into the lower wing, trailed behind the wing profile.
Changes were made to the glider, which was tested in three basic forms until the end of 1912, when Kitchen's ideas were discounted and Lee and Richards moved to London to continue their work (q.v.).
Data
Span 22ft
Area 400 sq ft
Weight 215 lb
Weight allup 385 1b
Speed 22mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LAKES seaplane Sea-Bird
The Sea-Bird was a reconstruction of the Avro Duigan tractor biplane, carried out under the supervision of Stanley-Adams at the Hill of Oaks base. It flew for the first time on 28 August 1912. It suffered a number of mishaps, with disintegrating propellers and handling by inexperienced people, during its long period in use as a passenger carrying and training aircraft, until finally written off on 3 June 1915. It was not a handsome aircraft and, although fitted with the original secondhand Gnome from the Water-Bird, it served a most useful life on Windermere.
The fuselage of the Avro was used with new three bay warping wings, and was initially mounted on a large two-step central float, with rubber band springing to the chassis. Inflated airbags, on springboards, were used at the wingtips and tail and a water rudder was hung behind the main float. Various changes of float were made, including an unsatisfactory amphibious type at the end of 1912. Twin floats being fitted in the winter of 1914-1915, when the wingtip floats were also discarded.
The engine was mounted high in the fuselage with a semicircular cowl, although this was removed later, probably due to overheating.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller
Data
Span 39ft 4in
Main float 12ft long 4ft beam 1ft deep
Chord 4ft 7in
Length 29ft 4in
Area 350 sq ft
Area tailplane 22 sq ft
Area elevators 14 sq ft
Area rudder 15 sq ft
Speed 62mph
The Sea-Bird was a reconstruction of the Avro Duigan tractor biplane, carried out under the supervision of Stanley-Adams at the Hill of Oaks base. It flew for the first time on 28 August 1912. It suffered a number of mishaps, with disintegrating propellers and handling by inexperienced people, during its long period in use as a passenger carrying and training aircraft, until finally written off on 3 June 1915. It was not a handsome aircraft and, although fitted with the original secondhand Gnome from the Water-Bird, it served a most useful life on Windermere.
The fuselage of the Avro was used with new three bay warping wings, and was initially mounted on a large two-step central float, with rubber band springing to the chassis. Inflated airbags, on springboards, were used at the wingtips and tail and a water rudder was hung behind the main float. Various changes of float were made, including an unsatisfactory amphibious type at the end of 1912. Twin floats being fitted in the winter of 1914-1915, when the wingtip floats were also discarded.
The engine was mounted high in the fuselage with a semicircular cowl, although this was removed later, probably due to overheating.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller
Data
Span 39ft 4in
Main float 12ft long 4ft beam 1ft deep
Chord 4ft 7in
Length 29ft 4in
Area 350 sq ft
Area tailplane 22 sq ft
Area elevators 14 sq ft
Area rudder 15 sq ft
Speed 62mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LAKES monoplane (Later NAC monoplane)
This pusher type monoplane seaplane was designed by O.T. Gnosspelius, and was made for the Lakes company by Borwick and Sons of Bowness in 1913-1914. The first flight was made in September 1914 by W.R. Ding, who had taken over the company by this time, and renamed it the Northern Aircraft Co. The aircraft was damaged on several occasions, including having the whole tail section broken off in May 1915 and, although repaired, was finally written off at the end of that month.
The pilot and passenger sat in tandem in a nacelle of rectangular section with a curved prow. The engine was attached at the rear, with the propeller in front of the engine, and the wings joined at the top longerons. The tail surfaces were attached to a braced, outrigger structure of tapering depth, which was carried forward to provide a chassis for mounting the single main float. This was attached to the nacelle by three pairs of struts and to the wing center section by two more pairs. Triangulated pylons, above the center section, provided anchorages for the wing bracing wires. Lateral control was by ailerons. Inflatable floats were fitted under the wings and tail.
As with previous Lakes seaplanes, the original single step central float was replaced with single step twin floats, covered with aluminum alloy sheet, in which form it flew first on 1 May 1915. The wing and tail floats were deleted and the tail surfaces increased in area at the same time.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary fitted with an Integral propeller
This pusher type monoplane seaplane was designed by O.T. Gnosspelius, and was made for the Lakes company by Borwick and Sons of Bowness in 1913-1914. The first flight was made in September 1914 by W.R. Ding, who had taken over the company by this time, and renamed it the Northern Aircraft Co. The aircraft was damaged on several occasions, including having the whole tail section broken off in May 1915 and, although repaired, was finally written off at the end of that month.
The pilot and passenger sat in tandem in a nacelle of rectangular section with a curved prow. The engine was attached at the rear, with the propeller in front of the engine, and the wings joined at the top longerons. The tail surfaces were attached to a braced, outrigger structure of tapering depth, which was carried forward to provide a chassis for mounting the single main float. This was attached to the nacelle by three pairs of struts and to the wing center section by two more pairs. Triangulated pylons, above the center section, provided anchorages for the wing bracing wires. Lateral control was by ailerons. Inflatable floats were fitted under the wings and tail.
As with previous Lakes seaplanes, the original single step central float was replaced with single step twin floats, covered with aluminum alloy sheet, in which form it flew first on 1 May 1915. The wing and tail floats were deleted and the tail surfaces increased in area at the same time.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary fitted with an Integral propeller
Lakes (later Northern Aircraft Co.) monoplane was built by Borwicks boat-builders of Bowness in 1913-1914 originally with a central float.
The hydro-monoplane designed by Mr. Gnospellus and built by the Lakes Flying Co., which has now been acquired by the Northern Aircraft Co. Mr. W. Rowland Ding is In the pilot's seat ready for a flight.
The hydro-monoplane designed by Mr. Gnospellus and built by the Lakes Flying Co., which has now been acquired by the Northern Aircraft Co. Mr. W. Rowland Ding is In the pilot's seat ready for a flight.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
AVRO Curtiss type biplane
This aircraft, ordered by Capt. E. W. Wakefield of Kendal, was built in 1911 at Manchester and then transferred to Brooklands, where it flew on the 19 July 1911 as a land-plane. After completion of flight tests it was delivered to Lake Windermere and fitted with a single central float and cylindrical floats below the lower wing tips, flying for the first time in this form on 25 November 1911. The machine was the subject of criticism and legal action by Wakefield against A.V. Roe and Co., but operated successfully until the following year under the name of Lakes Water Bird (q.v.).
LAKES FLYING Co. (Capt. E.W. Wakefield of Kendal and H. Stanley-Adams. Hangars at Hill of Oaks and Cockshot, Windermere, Cumberland)
This company, financed by Wakefield, was formed in December 1911 to run a seaplane flying school, for passenger carrying and for aircraft construction. Prior to forming the company Wakefield ordered an aircraft from A.V. Roe & Co. (q.v.). This machine became known as the Lakes Water-Bird. The company was taken over by the Northern Aircraft Co. on 11 November 1914.
LAKES seaplane Water-Bird
The aircraft built by Avro was of typical Curtiss design, with front elevator and single rudder, and tailplane carried on tapering bamboo booms. The wings were of unequal span, the upper carrying four single ailerons, the inboard being of wider chord and with curved trailing edges.
The machine was flown for the first time, as a land-plane at Brooklands, by R.C. Kemp on 19 June 1911, followed by other pilots, before it was transferred to Windermere. Once there, a three step central float with canvas top, made by Borwick and Sons of Bowness, was fitted, together with cylindrical canvas wing tip floats. In this form it flew in the hands of Stanley-Adams on 25 November 1911.
The long delay before the machine was flown was mainly caused by Wakefield's criticism of the engine, which was secondhand and had to be sent back to France to be reconditioned, but also because of some constructional problems in the airframe. The aircraft was damaged beyond repair at Cockshot Point, when the hangar was destroyed by a gale on 30 March 1912.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span top 41ft
Span bottom 32ft
Chord 5ft
Length 36ft 5 in
Main float 12ft long 2ft beam 1ft deep
Wing tip floats 3ft long 8in diameter with springboards below
Area 365 sq ft
Weight 780 lb
Weight allup 1,130lb
Speed 33-45 mph
Ceiling 800ft
One aircraft built at Manchester by A. V. Roe & Co.
LAKES seaplane Water-Hen
The Lakes company built a copy of the Water-Bird, incorporating various modifications, and named it Water-Hen. The changes included a single pair of parallel chord ailerons and a tail elevator. To cater for passenger carrying a larger central float with a single step, and with aluminum sheet covering of the bottom and sides, was again made by Borwicks. An enclosed nacelle with pointed front was fitted, to protect the crew, in the winter of 1912-1913.
Adams flew the Water-Hen for the first time on 30 April 1912 and it continued in use for passenger carrying and training work until well into 1916.
Later a longer nacelle with curved front was fitted and subsequently, twin widely spaced floats; at the same time the wingtip floats were removed. A water rudder was fitted below the rudder briefly, but was not effective. One aircraft only was built.
Data as for Water-Bird except for the following information from Flight.
Data
Span top 42ft
Area 375 sq ft (Quoted incorrectly in Flight as 270 sq ft)
Area tailplane 11 sq ft
Area rudder 9 1/2 sq ft
Area rear elevator 6 1/2 sq ft
Area front elevator 17 1/2 sq ft
Main float 12ft long 6ft beam 1ft deep
This aircraft, ordered by Capt. E. W. Wakefield of Kendal, was built in 1911 at Manchester and then transferred to Brooklands, where it flew on the 19 July 1911 as a land-plane. After completion of flight tests it was delivered to Lake Windermere and fitted with a single central float and cylindrical floats below the lower wing tips, flying for the first time in this form on 25 November 1911. The machine was the subject of criticism and legal action by Wakefield against A.V. Roe and Co., but operated successfully until the following year under the name of Lakes Water Bird (q.v.).
LAKES FLYING Co. (Capt. E.W. Wakefield of Kendal and H. Stanley-Adams. Hangars at Hill of Oaks and Cockshot, Windermere, Cumberland)
This company, financed by Wakefield, was formed in December 1911 to run a seaplane flying school, for passenger carrying and for aircraft construction. Prior to forming the company Wakefield ordered an aircraft from A.V. Roe & Co. (q.v.). This machine became known as the Lakes Water-Bird. The company was taken over by the Northern Aircraft Co. on 11 November 1914.
LAKES seaplane Water-Bird
The aircraft built by Avro was of typical Curtiss design, with front elevator and single rudder, and tailplane carried on tapering bamboo booms. The wings were of unequal span, the upper carrying four single ailerons, the inboard being of wider chord and with curved trailing edges.
The machine was flown for the first time, as a land-plane at Brooklands, by R.C. Kemp on 19 June 1911, followed by other pilots, before it was transferred to Windermere. Once there, a three step central float with canvas top, made by Borwick and Sons of Bowness, was fitted, together with cylindrical canvas wing tip floats. In this form it flew in the hands of Stanley-Adams on 25 November 1911.
The long delay before the machine was flown was mainly caused by Wakefield's criticism of the engine, which was secondhand and had to be sent back to France to be reconditioned, but also because of some constructional problems in the airframe. The aircraft was damaged beyond repair at Cockshot Point, when the hangar was destroyed by a gale on 30 March 1912.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span top 41ft
Span bottom 32ft
Chord 5ft
Length 36ft 5 in
Main float 12ft long 2ft beam 1ft deep
Wing tip floats 3ft long 8in diameter with springboards below
Area 365 sq ft
Weight 780 lb
Weight allup 1,130lb
Speed 33-45 mph
Ceiling 800ft
One aircraft built at Manchester by A. V. Roe & Co.
LAKES seaplane Water-Hen
The Lakes company built a copy of the Water-Bird, incorporating various modifications, and named it Water-Hen. The changes included a single pair of parallel chord ailerons and a tail elevator. To cater for passenger carrying a larger central float with a single step, and with aluminum sheet covering of the bottom and sides, was again made by Borwicks. An enclosed nacelle with pointed front was fitted, to protect the crew, in the winter of 1912-1913.
Adams flew the Water-Hen for the first time on 30 April 1912 and it continued in use for passenger carrying and training work until well into 1916.
Later a longer nacelle with curved front was fitted and subsequently, twin widely spaced floats; at the same time the wingtip floats were removed. A water rudder was fitted below the rudder briefly, but was not effective. One aircraft only was built.
Data as for Water-Bird except for the following information from Flight.
Data
Span top 42ft
Area 375 sq ft (Quoted incorrectly in Flight as 270 sq ft)
Area tailplane 11 sq ft
Area rudder 9 1/2 sq ft
Area rear elevator 6 1/2 sq ft
Area front elevator 17 1/2 sq ft
Main float 12ft long 6ft beam 1ft deep
The first person in the British Empire to make true flights from water was Herbert Stanley Adams, who made two sucessful flights of this seaplane, the Avro-Curtiss later named the Lakes Waterbird, on 25 November 1911.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LAKING No.l biplane (Guy Francis Laking, owner. Components built by T.W.K. Clarke of Kingston-on-Thames. Assembled by A. Fitch & Son, 610 Rosemary Rd., Clactonon-Sea, Essex)
Guy Laking, the son of Sir Francis Laking, physician to King Edward VII, specified and financed the building of a biplane, largely made by T.W.K. Clarke and assembled by Fitch & Son, under the supervision of Frank Fitch. A shed was erected at Bockings Elm, Little Clacton for the trial flights. The machine was still in the course of manufacture in October 1909 when reported in the Press, but later, when it appeared for the first time, the owner was reported to have gone abroad and the trials were postponed indefinitely. Laking appeal's to have lost interest and passed responsibility for the machine to Frank Fitch. (See Fitch biplane)
Power: Two 12hp JAP engines driving 5ft 8in diameter pusher propellers
Data
Span 33ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5ft
Area 330 sq ft (Press reported 156 sq yd!)
Weight allup 504lb
FITCH biplane (A. Fitch & Son, Motor Engineers, 610 Rosemary Rd., Clacton-on-Sea, Essex)
The Laking No. 1 biplane, completed in 1909 largely by T.W.K. Clarke, was abandoned by its owner, Guy Laking, when the initial tests were unsuccessful and he went abroad. It was subsequently handed over to Frank Fitch, who reconstructed it with a single 40hp engine.
The aeroplane, still identified as Laking No. 1, was taken to a field at Little Clacton on 10 June 1911 for final assembly and testing. It made its first flight on 4 July 1911 in the hands of Mr. Anthony Westlake, who himself had made a monoplane, in 1913 (q.v.). The circular flight covered about 300 yards at a height of 11ft at 20mph and the aircraft returned safely to near the original takeoff point. In the initial euphoria after this successful flight, the Press reported that a flight would take place to Colchester and a passenger could be carried, also a training school was to be established.
The machine was very lightly built and was reported to weigh only 5 1/2 cwt with pilot ready for flight. The major change from the Laking machine was the installation of the single engine said to be 'specially designed' and possibly built by Anthony Westlake. It may also have been the 40hp Lascelles which was auctioned in October 1913 (see Westlake).
The layout of the machine was basically as the original Laking No. 1 and was of a typical pusher biplane of the period, with front elevator and rear rudder on booms and presumably wing warping. The pilot, seated on the lower center section, rested his feet on the center of the axle, and controlled the machine by two levers.
Power: 40hp with fuel injection pumps, driving a 7ft 8in diameter pusher propeller.
Data
Span 33ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5ft
Area 330 sq ft (Press reported 165 sq yds!)
Weight allup 616lb
Fuel capacity 6 gal
Guy Laking, the son of Sir Francis Laking, physician to King Edward VII, specified and financed the building of a biplane, largely made by T.W.K. Clarke and assembled by Fitch & Son, under the supervision of Frank Fitch. A shed was erected at Bockings Elm, Little Clacton for the trial flights. The machine was still in the course of manufacture in October 1909 when reported in the Press, but later, when it appeared for the first time, the owner was reported to have gone abroad and the trials were postponed indefinitely. Laking appeal's to have lost interest and passed responsibility for the machine to Frank Fitch. (See Fitch biplane)
Power: Two 12hp JAP engines driving 5ft 8in diameter pusher propellers
Data
Span 33ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5ft
Area 330 sq ft (Press reported 156 sq yd!)
Weight allup 504lb
FITCH biplane (A. Fitch & Son, Motor Engineers, 610 Rosemary Rd., Clacton-on-Sea, Essex)
The Laking No. 1 biplane, completed in 1909 largely by T.W.K. Clarke, was abandoned by its owner, Guy Laking, when the initial tests were unsuccessful and he went abroad. It was subsequently handed over to Frank Fitch, who reconstructed it with a single 40hp engine.
The aeroplane, still identified as Laking No. 1, was taken to a field at Little Clacton on 10 June 1911 for final assembly and testing. It made its first flight on 4 July 1911 in the hands of Mr. Anthony Westlake, who himself had made a monoplane, in 1913 (q.v.). The circular flight covered about 300 yards at a height of 11ft at 20mph and the aircraft returned safely to near the original takeoff point. In the initial euphoria after this successful flight, the Press reported that a flight would take place to Colchester and a passenger could be carried, also a training school was to be established.
The machine was very lightly built and was reported to weigh only 5 1/2 cwt with pilot ready for flight. The major change from the Laking machine was the installation of the single engine said to be 'specially designed' and possibly built by Anthony Westlake. It may also have been the 40hp Lascelles which was auctioned in October 1913 (see Westlake).
The layout of the machine was basically as the original Laking No. 1 and was of a typical pusher biplane of the period, with front elevator and rear rudder on booms and presumably wing warping. The pilot, seated on the lower center section, rested his feet on the center of the axle, and controlled the machine by two levers.
Power: 40hp with fuel injection pumps, driving a 7ft 8in diameter pusher propeller.
Data
Span 33ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5ft
Area 330 sq ft (Press reported 165 sq yds!)
Weight allup 616lb
Fuel capacity 6 gal
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LAMPLOUGH Orthopter & Lifterplane (Lamplough & Sons, Albany Works, Willesden Junction, London, NW)
This machine was designed to operate on the principles of bird flight and was exhibited incomplete at the Aero Show of March 1909 at Olympia.
It consisted of an elongated framework of ash members covered with Continental fabric and containing the mechanism for operating a pair of biplane wings, with their leading edges facing one another. The propulsion system consisted of two pusher propellers on long shafts driven from the forward part of the machine. A swaying motion was imparted to the lifters, by cranks, and their angle of incidence was controlled by links. Conventional biplane wings, with five pairs of interplane struts, were mounted to the sides of the framework, and biplane elevators with single rudders at front and rear.
Needless to say the Orthopter was a failure and in 1910 was followed by a biplane ornithopter with wings actuated by a 25hp motor, which was probably a modification of the earlier machine.
Data
Span 20ft
Area 945 sq ft
Weight 900 lb
This machine was designed to operate on the principles of bird flight and was exhibited incomplete at the Aero Show of March 1909 at Olympia.
It consisted of an elongated framework of ash members covered with Continental fabric and containing the mechanism for operating a pair of biplane wings, with their leading edges facing one another. The propulsion system consisted of two pusher propellers on long shafts driven from the forward part of the machine. A swaying motion was imparted to the lifters, by cranks, and their angle of incidence was controlled by links. Conventional biplane wings, with five pairs of interplane struts, were mounted to the sides of the framework, and biplane elevators with single rudders at front and rear.
Needless to say the Orthopter was a failure and in 1910 was followed by a biplane ornithopter with wings actuated by a 25hp motor, which was probably a modification of the earlier machine.
Data
Span 20ft
Area 945 sq ft
Weight 900 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LANE biplane
Lane built a Farman type biplane in 1910, fitted with a 60hp ENV type F engine. It was illustrated in Flight on the 17 December 1910 (p.1037) with CW. Bowles, an ex-pupil of the Lane School in the pilot's seat; thereafter it went to India for the Maharajah of Patiala, for whom it was purchased.
It was a single-seat pusher of typical Farman layout with biplane tail and single front elevator. Single acting ailerons were fitted on top and bottom wings which were equal in span.
Lane built a Farman type biplane in 1910, fitted with a 60hp ENV type F engine. It was illustrated in Flight on the 17 December 1910 (p.1037) with CW. Bowles, an ex-pupil of the Lane School in the pilot's seat; thereafter it went to India for the Maharajah of Patiala, for whom it was purchased.
It was a single-seat pusher of typical Farman layout with biplane tail and single front elevator. Single acting ailerons were fitted on top and bottom wings which were equal in span.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LANE glider (Charles Lane, 31 Foley St., Lane's British Aeroplanes Ltd., with works at King's Place, King St., Camden Town, London, N. Flying at Brooklands, Hangar No.l)
A Wright type glider was operated from a starting rail on the Members Hill at Brooklands in the early part of 1910. The short glides, down the slope, received publicity because some were by Mrs. Gavin, an actress, which were claimed to be the first flights by an aviatrix in Britain. The machine was bought by Mr. Gavin and later carried his wife's stage name under the wings. It was taken to their home but little more was heard of it.
The glider was a two bay biplane with single acting ailerons on the top wings, the lower wings being curved up towards the tips. A front elevator was carried on booms and two rudders were mounted in the rear booms, that also carried an elevator.
A Wright type glider was operated from a starting rail on the Members Hill at Brooklands in the early part of 1910. The short glides, down the slope, received publicity because some were by Mrs. Gavin, an actress, which were claimed to be the first flights by an aviatrix in Britain. The machine was bought by Mr. Gavin and later carried his wife's stage name under the wings. It was taken to their home but little more was heard of it.
The glider was a two bay biplane with single acting ailerons on the top wings, the lower wings being curved up towards the tips. A front elevator was carried on booms and two rudders were mounted in the rear booms, that also carried an elevator.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LANE monoplane
This single-seat monoplane was built on the lines of a Bleriot XI, but with a tailplane below the bottom longeron, and divided elevators mounted separately above and slightly behind. The castering undercarriage was sprung by rubber cords, connected by wires horizontally to a point midway down the fuselage, and served the purpose of realigning the wheels, as well as providing sprung suspension. Construction was of wood with a tubular steel undercarriage.
The first report was of trials conducted by Charles Lane on 13 January 1910. Wilfred Foulis, who was to become Lane's agent in Scotland, received a machine in February, which he was reported to be flying near Edinburgh in the spring. A monoplane with the fuselage uncovered was shown at Olympia in March 1910. This machine, and the Foulis aircraft, were certainly fitted with NEC engines. In May, The Aero reported two machines in hangar No.l at Brooklands, by then fitted with non-castering undercarriage with twin skids and four wheels, with which Lane and Astley continued flying throughout the summer.
It appears that the first Lane monoplane was originally fitted with a three-cylinder Anzani engine, which was replaced with the four-cylinder two-stroke NEC. This was an unsatisfactory engine, which did not produce the claimed power, and was finally replaced by a 35hp ENV, with which it was flown on 26 May 1910, receiving a complimentary Press report.
An early Lane monoplane fitted with an Anzani engine was wrecked at Brooklands on 25 July 1911 when flown by Pashley.
Power:
25hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan-type semiradial
25-30hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke driving a 7ft diameter propeller
35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Length 24ft
Area 160 sq ft (201 sq ft)*
Area tailplane 21 sq ft (26 sq ft)*
Area elevators 18 sq ft (24 sq ft)*
Area rudder 5 1/2 sq ft (8 sq ft)*
Weight 425 lb (450 lb)*
Weight allup 650 lb
Speed 30mph
Price with ENV ?500
* Alternative data from The Aero
LANE monoplane
In addition to the single-seater, Lane also exhibited at Olympia an incomplete side-by-side two-seater, similar in layout to the Bleriot XII, but with Lane's own type of tail unit and undercarriage. In this case the elevator was in one piece and the rudder was divided, the lower portion serving as a skid.
The engine was mounted low down in the airframe, with the propeller level with the leading edge, chain driven at about a reduction of two to one. The pilot and passenger sat on a bench seat behind the engine, just below the wing trailing edge.
The Bleriot XII was not a great success and the similar Lane machine followed it into obscurity. There are no reports of testing and the machine may not have been completed after the Aero Show.
Two Lane monoplanes, a single-seater and a two-seater, were offered for sale by L.N. Palmer of Tooting, London SW at bankrupt prices.
Power: 60hp NEC six-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke driving by chain an 8ft 6in (8ft 8in)* diameter propeller at 2 to 1 reduction
Data
Span 36ft 6in
Chord 7ft 10in (8ft)*
Length 24ft
Area 250 sq ft (320 sq ft)*
Area tailplane 30 sq ft
Area elevators 25 sq ft (26 sq ft)*
Area rudder 7 sq ft (8 sq ft)*
Weight 770 lb (675 lb)*
Weight allup 970 lb
Speed 30mph
Price ?800
*Alternative contemporary data
This single-seat monoplane was built on the lines of a Bleriot XI, but with a tailplane below the bottom longeron, and divided elevators mounted separately above and slightly behind. The castering undercarriage was sprung by rubber cords, connected by wires horizontally to a point midway down the fuselage, and served the purpose of realigning the wheels, as well as providing sprung suspension. Construction was of wood with a tubular steel undercarriage.
The first report was of trials conducted by Charles Lane on 13 January 1910. Wilfred Foulis, who was to become Lane's agent in Scotland, received a machine in February, which he was reported to be flying near Edinburgh in the spring. A monoplane with the fuselage uncovered was shown at Olympia in March 1910. This machine, and the Foulis aircraft, were certainly fitted with NEC engines. In May, The Aero reported two machines in hangar No.l at Brooklands, by then fitted with non-castering undercarriage with twin skids and four wheels, with which Lane and Astley continued flying throughout the summer.
It appears that the first Lane monoplane was originally fitted with a three-cylinder Anzani engine, which was replaced with the four-cylinder two-stroke NEC. This was an unsatisfactory engine, which did not produce the claimed power, and was finally replaced by a 35hp ENV, with which it was flown on 26 May 1910, receiving a complimentary Press report.
An early Lane monoplane fitted with an Anzani engine was wrecked at Brooklands on 25 July 1911 when flown by Pashley.
Power:
25hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan-type semiradial
25-30hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke driving a 7ft diameter propeller
35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Length 24ft
Area 160 sq ft (201 sq ft)*
Area tailplane 21 sq ft (26 sq ft)*
Area elevators 18 sq ft (24 sq ft)*
Area rudder 5 1/2 sq ft (8 sq ft)*
Weight 425 lb (450 lb)*
Weight allup 650 lb
Speed 30mph
Price with ENV ?500
* Alternative data from The Aero
LANE monoplane
In addition to the single-seater, Lane also exhibited at Olympia an incomplete side-by-side two-seater, similar in layout to the Bleriot XII, but with Lane's own type of tail unit and undercarriage. In this case the elevator was in one piece and the rudder was divided, the lower portion serving as a skid.
The engine was mounted low down in the airframe, with the propeller level with the leading edge, chain driven at about a reduction of two to one. The pilot and passenger sat on a bench seat behind the engine, just below the wing trailing edge.
The Bleriot XII was not a great success and the similar Lane machine followed it into obscurity. There are no reports of testing and the machine may not have been completed after the Aero Show.
Two Lane monoplanes, a single-seater and a two-seater, were offered for sale by L.N. Palmer of Tooting, London SW at bankrupt prices.
Power: 60hp NEC six-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke driving by chain an 8ft 6in (8ft 8in)* diameter propeller at 2 to 1 reduction
Data
Span 36ft 6in
Chord 7ft 10in (8ft)*
Length 24ft
Area 250 sq ft (320 sq ft)*
Area tailplane 30 sq ft
Area elevators 25 sq ft (26 sq ft)*
Area rudder 7 sq ft (8 sq ft)*
Weight 770 lb (675 lb)*
Weight allup 970 lb
Speed 30mph
Price ?800
*Alternative contemporary data
Lane monoplane No.2 at Olympia in March 1910. Several of the smaller machines at the rear were made.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LANGLEY SMITHERS monoplane
This aircraft was built in 1908-1909 and was assembled and tested at Knockholt Cricket ground in Kent. It took off, but crashed on the first attempt and appears not to have been rebuilt.
The fuselage of the monoplane was an open parallel girder, with curved top and bottom members, meeting at both front and rear ends. A tailplane and front elevator were fitted. There was considerable dihedral to the wings, which were braced to a tall pylon of four struts, and could be warped. The unidentified type of motor drove twin tractor propellers, apparently by shafts and bevel gearing.
This aircraft was built in 1908-1909 and was assembled and tested at Knockholt Cricket ground in Kent. It took off, but crashed on the first attempt and appears not to have been rebuilt.
The fuselage of the monoplane was an open parallel girder, with curved top and bottom members, meeting at both front and rear ends. A tailplane and front elevator were fitted. There was considerable dihedral to the wings, which were braced to a tall pylon of four struts, and could be warped. The unidentified type of motor drove twin tractor propellers, apparently by shafts and bevel gearing.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LEE RICHARDS annular monoplane No.l (Cedric Lee and George Tilghman Richards)
The association with Kitchen (q.v.), having ended in 1912, wind tunnel tests were earned out at the East London College and at the NPL to establish aerodynamic data for a new design of monoplane. After a false start with Blackburns, the detail design and construction was undertaken by James Radley and E.C. Gordon England, his works manager and test pilot at Shoreham. After problems created by Radley, the machine was completed and ready to be flown by Gordon England on 23 November 1913. After a minimum of taxiing, he flew successfully for the first time, although noting tail heaviness, until the engine cut out through lack of fuel, on the approach to land. In the resulting, crash Gordon England was injured and out of action for some months. The engine and other mechanical parts were salvaged for use in a new machine.
The monoplane wing was a complex structure, which required considerable ingenuity by Gordon England in its construction, involving as it did, a variety of sections at different positions in the wing. This was built in two halves around two steel tube, semicircular spars, spaced by steel tube compression struts at intervals. On to this basic structure were placed numerous wooden ribs, positioned radially, and connected by inner and outer edge members and stringers. At the rear edge, each wing was cut straight across to form flaps, serving as both elevators and ailerons, their trailing edges continuing the outline of the wing.
The fuselage was a tapering wooden girder of four longerons and struts braced by wires, with the addition of a curved top decking. The propeller was mounted on a long extension shaft on the Gnome engine, which was mounted on a bulkhead, to which the rear spars were also attached. Behind this were fuel and oil tanks, with the passenger seat and pilot behind. An inverted Y-pylon, in front of the passenger's cockpit, provided an anchorage for the numerous bracing wires. A long dorsal fin and semicircular rudder were fitted. The undercarriage consisted of two wheels on swing axles pivoted on the vee-shaped pylon below the fuselage, which also served as the anchorage for the lift wires. A pair of nose wheels was mounted on the central member protruding forward of the pylon. The tail was also protected by a skid.
Power: 80hp Gnome Monosoupape seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 22ft
Dihedral 5 deg
Length 23ft 6in
Area 280 sq ft
Weight allup 1,680 lb (2 crew) 1,500 lb (as flown)
Speed 83-85 mph
Climb 300ft per min
LEE RICHARDS annular monoplane No.2
The second aircraft was completed and flown by England in February or March 1914, but after a number of flights totaling some 25 hours, a tendency to spin was not resolved and he resigned. Following this N.S. Percival flew once, followed by Gordon Bell from early April until 25 April 1914, when the machine was wrecked, the pilot having lost elevator control. This monoplane was almost identical in appearance to No.l except for an additional elevator above the rudders, and the parallel chord elevators behind the wings, which were moved outwards during the course of development. The wing dihedral was reduced from 5 to 3 degrees. A speed range of 30 to 70 mph was reported.
At the end of February, Lee made two entries of machines with Austro-Daimler engines for the Gordon Bennett Race of September 1914, which was abandoned when war broke out. These machines would have been based on No.2, or its successor, would have a wingspan of fifteen feet and were reported to be partly built.
LEE RICHARDS annular monoplane No.3
The third machine incorporated changes to improve control and reduce lateral stability, by a reduction of dihedral to 1 1/2 degrees, and changes of wing section. The improvised biplane tail of No.2 was replaced with enlarged elevons, positioned well out to the side, and faired into the wing outline. A large ventral fin was added with a parallel chord rudder of greater area.
The date of completion is not recorded, but the machine was being flown by Gordon Bell up to the outbreak of war. Cedric Lee, who was an inexperienced pilot, then attempted to fly No.3 in August 1914 and crashed into the River Adur, wrecking the machine, but only suffering minor injuries himself.
The association with Kitchen (q.v.), having ended in 1912, wind tunnel tests were earned out at the East London College and at the NPL to establish aerodynamic data for a new design of monoplane. After a false start with Blackburns, the detail design and construction was undertaken by James Radley and E.C. Gordon England, his works manager and test pilot at Shoreham. After problems created by Radley, the machine was completed and ready to be flown by Gordon England on 23 November 1913. After a minimum of taxiing, he flew successfully for the first time, although noting tail heaviness, until the engine cut out through lack of fuel, on the approach to land. In the resulting, crash Gordon England was injured and out of action for some months. The engine and other mechanical parts were salvaged for use in a new machine.
The monoplane wing was a complex structure, which required considerable ingenuity by Gordon England in its construction, involving as it did, a variety of sections at different positions in the wing. This was built in two halves around two steel tube, semicircular spars, spaced by steel tube compression struts at intervals. On to this basic structure were placed numerous wooden ribs, positioned radially, and connected by inner and outer edge members and stringers. At the rear edge, each wing was cut straight across to form flaps, serving as both elevators and ailerons, their trailing edges continuing the outline of the wing.
The fuselage was a tapering wooden girder of four longerons and struts braced by wires, with the addition of a curved top decking. The propeller was mounted on a long extension shaft on the Gnome engine, which was mounted on a bulkhead, to which the rear spars were also attached. Behind this were fuel and oil tanks, with the passenger seat and pilot behind. An inverted Y-pylon, in front of the passenger's cockpit, provided an anchorage for the numerous bracing wires. A long dorsal fin and semicircular rudder were fitted. The undercarriage consisted of two wheels on swing axles pivoted on the vee-shaped pylon below the fuselage, which also served as the anchorage for the lift wires. A pair of nose wheels was mounted on the central member protruding forward of the pylon. The tail was also protected by a skid.
Power: 80hp Gnome Monosoupape seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 22ft
Dihedral 5 deg
Length 23ft 6in
Area 280 sq ft
Weight allup 1,680 lb (2 crew) 1,500 lb (as flown)
Speed 83-85 mph
Climb 300ft per min
LEE RICHARDS annular monoplane No.2
The second aircraft was completed and flown by England in February or March 1914, but after a number of flights totaling some 25 hours, a tendency to spin was not resolved and he resigned. Following this N.S. Percival flew once, followed by Gordon Bell from early April until 25 April 1914, when the machine was wrecked, the pilot having lost elevator control. This monoplane was almost identical in appearance to No.l except for an additional elevator above the rudders, and the parallel chord elevators behind the wings, which were moved outwards during the course of development. The wing dihedral was reduced from 5 to 3 degrees. A speed range of 30 to 70 mph was reported.
At the end of February, Lee made two entries of machines with Austro-Daimler engines for the Gordon Bennett Race of September 1914, which was abandoned when war broke out. These machines would have been based on No.2, or its successor, would have a wingspan of fifteen feet and were reported to be partly built.
LEE RICHARDS annular monoplane No.3
The third machine incorporated changes to improve control and reduce lateral stability, by a reduction of dihedral to 1 1/2 degrees, and changes of wing section. The improvised biplane tail of No.2 was replaced with enlarged elevons, positioned well out to the side, and faired into the wing outline. A large ventral fin was added with a parallel chord rudder of greater area.
The date of completion is not recorded, but the machine was being flown by Gordon Bell up to the outbreak of war. Cedric Lee, who was an inexperienced pilot, then attempted to fly No.3 in August 1914 and crashed into the River Adur, wrecking the machine, but only suffering minor injuries himself.
Lee-Richards annular monoplane No.2 of 1914 was similar to No.l but with additional elevators above the tail and behind the wings.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LGD monoplane glider. (LGD of 'The Motor' magazine, London)
This tail first monoplane glider was made in 1909 by a member of the staff of The Motor, who described it in that journal as one of the few gliders with a double surfaced wing, then in being.
The two spars, of the parallel chord wings, were joined at the center, and were attached to the top members of an open structure. The lower members of this structure were skids, supporting a platform, on which the operator was seated. He controlled the flat section front elevator with a short control column. The wings were braced to an overhead cabane and below to the skid members. Spruce and hickory wood were used in its construction.
Data
Span 23ft
Chord 6ft
Length 15ft
Height 4ft
Area 140 sqft
Weight 53 lb
This tail first monoplane glider was made in 1909 by a member of the staff of The Motor, who described it in that journal as one of the few gliders with a double surfaced wing, then in being.
The two spars, of the parallel chord wings, were joined at the center, and were attached to the top members of an open structure. The lower members of this structure were skids, supporting a platform, on which the operator was seated. He controlled the flat section front elevator with a short control column. The wings were braced to an overhead cabane and below to the skid members. Spruce and hickory wood were used in its construction.
Data
Span 23ft
Chord 6ft
Length 15ft
Height 4ft
Area 140 sqft
Weight 53 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LIWENTAAL glider, the Dittisham Aerostat (Albert or Alexander Liwentaal, Snail Cottage, Dittisham, Dartmouth, Devon)
Liwentaal was a Swiss who worked in the shipyard of Simpson and Strickland at Noss, Dartmouth. Between 1891 and 1911, a number of patents were taken out in the name of Alexander Liwentaal relating to flying machines.
His first attempt at flight seems to have been in February 1894, from a hill above Dittisham Mill Creek. Although the machine lifted six or seven feet for several yards, it was damaged when hit by a gust of wind. A further attempt was made in April from slopes at Bozamzeal, Dittisham which resulted in severe damage and injury to Liwentaal needing treatment in Dartmouth hospital.
The pilot sat on a bicycle saddle astride a single steel tube fuselage, mounted on an undercarriage consisting of a single bicycle wheel and a tail skid. The wing, shaped like that of a gull, comprised a straight main spar and curved leading edge member, and ribs of pine and a wire trailing edge. The tailplane was 'all moving' and there was a rudder for directional control.
LIWENTAAL ornithopter
After the accident with his glider, Lt. Liwentaal proposed, in a letter to the Press, to build a two-seater powered machine with flapping wings, which was said to be in course of construction in December 1894. Nothing further was heard of this and Liwentaal moved to London. His use of military rank probably stemmed from service in the Swiss Army, a largely part-time organization.
Power: 30hp and 5hp. The small engine presumably to operate the wing flapping at a maximum of forty strokes per minute.
Data
Span 54ft
Length 27ft
Area 475 sq ft
Area tailplane 125sqft
Weight 300 lb
Weight allup 600 lb
Speed 70mph est.
LIWENTAAL monoplane (Alexander Liwentaal, 92 High St., Islington, London N)
Some years later, when he was living in London, Liwentaal took out patent No.11784/1911. This was for a tractor monoplane with a control system consisting solely of air under pressure directed to valves at the extremities of the machine, where it emerged as jets. The operation of the valves was to be controlled by pendulums. This machine remained as a project only, but the control by air jets was remarkably similar to the reaction control system used in the 1960s in the Harrier jet fighter.
In 1909, back in Switzerland, Liwentaal constructed the unsuccessful Libellan monoplane at Vernier, Geneva and was involved in the promotion of an airship, to be named 'Vdle de Geneve', which failed to materialize due to lack of funds. In wartime he is reported to have had an aircraft factory at Courbevoie, near Paris, which was bombed by a Zeppelin and in 1919 he emigrated to Canada.
Liwentaal was a Swiss who worked in the shipyard of Simpson and Strickland at Noss, Dartmouth. Between 1891 and 1911, a number of patents were taken out in the name of Alexander Liwentaal relating to flying machines.
His first attempt at flight seems to have been in February 1894, from a hill above Dittisham Mill Creek. Although the machine lifted six or seven feet for several yards, it was damaged when hit by a gust of wind. A further attempt was made in April from slopes at Bozamzeal, Dittisham which resulted in severe damage and injury to Liwentaal needing treatment in Dartmouth hospital.
The pilot sat on a bicycle saddle astride a single steel tube fuselage, mounted on an undercarriage consisting of a single bicycle wheel and a tail skid. The wing, shaped like that of a gull, comprised a straight main spar and curved leading edge member, and ribs of pine and a wire trailing edge. The tailplane was 'all moving' and there was a rudder for directional control.
LIWENTAAL ornithopter
After the accident with his glider, Lt. Liwentaal proposed, in a letter to the Press, to build a two-seater powered machine with flapping wings, which was said to be in course of construction in December 1894. Nothing further was heard of this and Liwentaal moved to London. His use of military rank probably stemmed from service in the Swiss Army, a largely part-time organization.
Power: 30hp and 5hp. The small engine presumably to operate the wing flapping at a maximum of forty strokes per minute.
Data
Span 54ft
Length 27ft
Area 475 sq ft
Area tailplane 125sqft
Weight 300 lb
Weight allup 600 lb
Speed 70mph est.
LIWENTAAL monoplane (Alexander Liwentaal, 92 High St., Islington, London N)
Some years later, when he was living in London, Liwentaal took out patent No.11784/1911. This was for a tractor monoplane with a control system consisting solely of air under pressure directed to valves at the extremities of the machine, where it emerged as jets. The operation of the valves was to be controlled by pendulums. This machine remained as a project only, but the control by air jets was remarkably similar to the reaction control system used in the 1960s in the Harrier jet fighter.
In 1909, back in Switzerland, Liwentaal constructed the unsuccessful Libellan monoplane at Vernier, Geneva and was involved in the promotion of an airship, to be named 'Vdle de Geneve', which failed to materialize due to lack of funds. In wartime he is reported to have had an aircraft factory at Courbevoie, near Paris, which was bombed by a Zeppelin and in 1919 he emigrated to Canada.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LOCKE glider (J.C. Locke, 47 Buxton Rd., Chingford, Essex)
This was built during 1910 and was tested at Barking on 26 July 1910. The machine was tailless with a swept back wing, braced to kingposts, above and below; the machine rested on skids.
Data
Span 37ft
Chord 7ft
This was built during 1910 and was tested at Barking on 26 July 1910. The machine was tailless with a swept back wing, braced to kingposts, above and below; the machine rested on skids.
Data
Span 37ft
Chord 7ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LONDON & PROVINCIAL biplane (London & Provincial Aviation Co., Hendon)
Messrs. Warren and Smiles operated a flying school at Hendon and built a biplane, for tuition purposes, which was ready by September 1914. Further machines were to be completed later. Illustrations of the machine showed a typical Caudron biplane with no obvious differences from original French-built machines.
Power: 35hp Anzani three-cylinder Y-type air-cooled radial.
Messrs. Warren and Smiles operated a flying school at Hendon and built a biplane, for tuition purposes, which was ready by September 1914. Further machines were to be completed later. Illustrations of the machine showed a typical Caudron biplane with no obvious differences from original French-built machines.
Power: 35hp Anzani three-cylinder Y-type air-cooled radial.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LONG monoplane (J.B.D. Long, London Aviation Ground, Acton)
This machine was built on Bleriot lines, apart from its four wheel and skid type undercarriage and long tail-skid. It was constructed by Robert Beney & Co. of 7 Carlisle St., London W, using materials from Handley Page, and was tested early in 1911 at Acton.
This machine was built on Bleriot lines, apart from its four wheel and skid type undercarriage and long tail-skid. It was constructed by Robert Beney & Co. of 7 Carlisle St., London W, using materials from Handley Page, and was tested early in 1911 at Acton.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LONG monoplane (Victor Long, The Firs, Arundel, Sussex)
This monoplane, built in 1910-1911, was similar in layout to a Bleriot and incorporated a Bleriot type undercarriage. However it differed in other respects, particularly in the tail unit, which consisted of a one piece elevator and tailplane, with a long triangular fin and square shaped rudder, mounted above the fuselage girder. The heavily cambered wings incorporated cutouts for small ailerons in the trailing edges.
A 20/24hp JAP vee four, side valve, air-cooled engine was fitted, originally with a Cochrane metal propeller with corrugated metal trailing portions, but this was replaced by a Chauviere wooden propeller at some stage. The original pilots controls consisted of two hand wheels, Antoinette style, mounted fore and aft on the top longerons, but these were replaced with a more usual control column.
No record of tests or flight exists. Long discontinued his aviation activities and offered a Bleriot type monoplane with 'Farman type' landing chassis, without engine and propeller for ?20 in Flight on 8 July 1911 and the JAP engine and Chauviere propeller for ?70 on 5 August 1911, together with a Bleriot chassis.
This monoplane, built in 1910-1911, was similar in layout to a Bleriot and incorporated a Bleriot type undercarriage. However it differed in other respects, particularly in the tail unit, which consisted of a one piece elevator and tailplane, with a long triangular fin and square shaped rudder, mounted above the fuselage girder. The heavily cambered wings incorporated cutouts for small ailerons in the trailing edges.
A 20/24hp JAP vee four, side valve, air-cooled engine was fitted, originally with a Cochrane metal propeller with corrugated metal trailing portions, but this was replaced by a Chauviere wooden propeller at some stage. The original pilots controls consisted of two hand wheels, Antoinette style, mounted fore and aft on the top longerons, but these were replaced with a more usual control column.
No record of tests or flight exists. Long discontinued his aviation activities and offered a Bleriot type monoplane with 'Farman type' landing chassis, without engine and propeller for ?20 in Flight on 8 July 1911 and the JAP engine and Chauviere propeller for ?70 on 5 August 1911, together with a Bleriot chassis.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LUMB monoplane (J. Lumb, Blackpool, Lancashire)
Lumb constructed this machine in 1909 and took it to the Blackpool Aviation Meeting that year, but it did not fly during the meeting. The engine was a 50hp JAP, of unknown type. No more was heard of this machine.
Data
Span 36ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Lumb constructed this machine in 1909 and took it to the Blackpool Aviation Meeting that year, but it did not fly during the meeting. The engine was a 50hp JAP, of unknown type. No more was heard of this machine.
Data
Span 36ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
LYSTER-SMYTHE glider (Cecil and Richard Lyster-Smythe, Barbavilla, County Westmeath, Ireland)
The Lyster-Smythe brothers aged fourteen and twelve respectively built a primitive biplane glider, towards the end of 1909 and did all the work themselves, with the exception of the wheel axles. Although somewhat crudely made, the brothers were able to achieve a number of glides of thirty or forty yards. A rudder was fitted and a front elevator but with no obvious method of warping the wings. The undercarriage comprised of a pair of bicycle wheels.
Data
Span 20ft
Chord 6ft 4in
Height 6ft
The Lyster-Smythe brothers aged fourteen and twelve respectively built a primitive biplane glider, towards the end of 1909 and did all the work themselves, with the exception of the wheel axles. Although somewhat crudely made, the brothers were able to achieve a number of glides of thirty or forty yards. A rudder was fitted and a front elevator but with no obvious method of warping the wings. The undercarriage comprised of a pair of bicycle wheels.
Data
Span 20ft
Chord 6ft 4in
Height 6ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MACFIE monoplane (Robert Francis Macfie, Fambridge and Maplin Sands, Essex)
Macfie came from San Francisco to England in 1909, and began construction of the monoplane at Fambridge on 2 August 1909. Trials commenced on 16 September 1909 and flight was achieved in the period to 19 October 1909, after various modifications and repair of damage. Fambridge was unsuitable as a flying ground, and on 11 November 1909, the monoplane was taken to Maplin Sands, but was removed by the end of the month after damage, bad weather and a War Office order to move. Unable to find a suitable field in the Southeast and Midlands, Macfie took the aircraft to France, but was refused permission to fly at Pau, and Croix d'Hins was considered unsuitable. When the machine was received back in London on 2 February 1910 it was beyond repair.
The monoplane was a single-seat tractor with a triangular section fuselage consisting of a tapering ash girder, made with butt joints, reinforced with steel fittings, bound by tape, and glued. The whole structure was braced by wires and was mainly uncovered. The castering undercarriage was made of steel tubing and was sprung, as was the tail-skid.
The wing had a marked camber and small dihedral and incorporated a warping trailing edge portion. Two triangulated pylons above the fuselage provided anchorages for bracing wires and the warping control.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 28ft 6in
Chord 6ft 6in
Height 5ft to center prop boss
Area 164 sq ft
Area elevators 24 sq ft
Area rudder 4 sq ft
Weight 680 lb
Macfie came from San Francisco to England in 1909, and began construction of the monoplane at Fambridge on 2 August 1909. Trials commenced on 16 September 1909 and flight was achieved in the period to 19 October 1909, after various modifications and repair of damage. Fambridge was unsuitable as a flying ground, and on 11 November 1909, the monoplane was taken to Maplin Sands, but was removed by the end of the month after damage, bad weather and a War Office order to move. Unable to find a suitable field in the Southeast and Midlands, Macfie took the aircraft to France, but was refused permission to fly at Pau, and Croix d'Hins was considered unsuitable. When the machine was received back in London on 2 February 1910 it was beyond repair.
The monoplane was a single-seat tractor with a triangular section fuselage consisting of a tapering ash girder, made with butt joints, reinforced with steel fittings, bound by tape, and glued. The whole structure was braced by wires and was mainly uncovered. The castering undercarriage was made of steel tubing and was sprung, as was the tail-skid.
The wing had a marked camber and small dihedral and incorporated a warping trailing edge portion. Two triangulated pylons above the fuselage provided anchorages for bracing wires and the warping control.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span 28ft 6in
Chord 6ft 6in
Height 5ft to center prop boss
Area 164 sq ft
Area elevators 24 sq ft
Area rudder 4 sq ft
Weight 680 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MACFIE Empress biplane (Flying at Portholme, Hunts and Brooklands)
This machine was designed by Macfie, the parts were fabricated by W.H. Tothill and the aircraft was assembled at Portholme, between March and May 1910. First flight took place on 12 May 1910, but immediately afterwards, permission to use the ground was withdrawn and Macfie moved to Brooklands in June. First straights took place there on 18 June 1910 with insufficient power for proper flight. The machine was then altered to become more of a Farman type and loaned to J. Radley to take to Wolverhampton, but apparently was not used.
On its return in July, the aircraft reverted to its original form, and damage, including that caused by a fire, was repaired. In the week ending 14 August 1910, the aircraft reappeared at Brooklands with a 35hp Green engine in place, but lacking a suitable propeller, could not achieve flight. In September a 50hp Gnome was fitted and with this engine straight flights were made. However, as control was too sensitive, the tail booms were extended by five feet, in which form the aircraft flew on 4 October 1910 more satisfactorily. Macfie flew in the Neill Cup Contest, but only accumulated 7min 15sec flying time on 6 October 1910, far less than the 2hr 59min 17sec of Gilmour, the winner. Nevertheless the biplane flew well and was used by Macfie to obtain his RAeC pilot's certificate No.49 in January 1911, and it was also flown by others including J. Valentine.
A new engine, the Empress rotary, was fitted and ground tested on 20 November 1910. The aircraft was being flown by O.C. Morison on 22 January 1911, when the engine cut out and he landed in the sewage farm. The aircraft was salvaged and some of the parts used to rebuild it, probably again fitted with the Gnome. Straights were flown on 1 March 1911 and circuits on 8 March 1911.
The basic Macfie biplane was a typical pusher machine of the time, with front and rear elevators and fitted initially with a single rudder, which was replaced by two at some stage. The engine, pilot and passenger were mounted centrally on a platform, on struts between the wings, which carried single acting ailerons on both top and bottom planes, the rear booms were parallel in plan, but tapered to a point in elevation. The front lower booms were extensions of the undercarriage skids, which curved upwards to meet the straight top booms at the front elevator pivots. The skids were extended aft to support the tail and provided the mountings for the four main wheels on separate axles.
Macfie seems to have concentrated on his next aircraft and made little use of his biplane after it was rebuilt. At some time in 1911 he disposed of it to Herbert Spencer who rebuilt it on Farman lines and completed and flew the machine at Brooklands in April 1912.
No data is available other than information on the various power plants and the fact that the tail was extended by five feet at an early stage.
Power:
35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee, originally in the monoplane.
35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled from 14 August 1910.
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary from 20 September 1910.
50hp Empress seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary from 20 November 1910. Gnome fitted again later
This machine was designed by Macfie, the parts were fabricated by W.H. Tothill and the aircraft was assembled at Portholme, between March and May 1910. First flight took place on 12 May 1910, but immediately afterwards, permission to use the ground was withdrawn and Macfie moved to Brooklands in June. First straights took place there on 18 June 1910 with insufficient power for proper flight. The machine was then altered to become more of a Farman type and loaned to J. Radley to take to Wolverhampton, but apparently was not used.
On its return in July, the aircraft reverted to its original form, and damage, including that caused by a fire, was repaired. In the week ending 14 August 1910, the aircraft reappeared at Brooklands with a 35hp Green engine in place, but lacking a suitable propeller, could not achieve flight. In September a 50hp Gnome was fitted and with this engine straight flights were made. However, as control was too sensitive, the tail booms were extended by five feet, in which form the aircraft flew on 4 October 1910 more satisfactorily. Macfie flew in the Neill Cup Contest, but only accumulated 7min 15sec flying time on 6 October 1910, far less than the 2hr 59min 17sec of Gilmour, the winner. Nevertheless the biplane flew well and was used by Macfie to obtain his RAeC pilot's certificate No.49 in January 1911, and it was also flown by others including J. Valentine.
A new engine, the Empress rotary, was fitted and ground tested on 20 November 1910. The aircraft was being flown by O.C. Morison on 22 January 1911, when the engine cut out and he landed in the sewage farm. The aircraft was salvaged and some of the parts used to rebuild it, probably again fitted with the Gnome. Straights were flown on 1 March 1911 and circuits on 8 March 1911.
The basic Macfie biplane was a typical pusher machine of the time, with front and rear elevators and fitted initially with a single rudder, which was replaced by two at some stage. The engine, pilot and passenger were mounted centrally on a platform, on struts between the wings, which carried single acting ailerons on both top and bottom planes, the rear booms were parallel in plan, but tapered to a point in elevation. The front lower booms were extensions of the undercarriage skids, which curved upwards to meet the straight top booms at the front elevator pivots. The skids were extended aft to support the tail and provided the mountings for the four main wheels on separate axles.
Macfie seems to have concentrated on his next aircraft and made little use of his biplane after it was rebuilt. At some time in 1911 he disposed of it to Herbert Spencer who rebuilt it on Farman lines and completed and flew the machine at Brooklands in April 1912.
No data is available other than information on the various power plants and the fact that the tail was extended by five feet at an early stage.
Power:
35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee, originally in the monoplane.
35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled from 14 August 1910.
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary from 20 September 1910.
50hp Empress seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary from 20 November 1910. Gnome fitted again later
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MACFIE Circuit biplane
Macfie's entry for the Circuit of Britain of 1911 was built in three weeks and came out at Brooklands on 17 July 1911, but was damaged on its first attempt at taxiing. It seems that the center of gravity was too far forward, putting pressure on the skids, causing them to break and foul the propeller. Withdrawal from the contest resulted and no further attempt to rebuild the aircraft was made.
The intended 100hp ABC engine was not available in time and a 50hp Gnome was fitted instead. The fuselage was an open rectangular section, wooden, braced girder tapering in plan and elevation, but finishing at a vertical post well behind the tail unit. The fuselage was mounted centrally on struts between the wings, enabling the pilot to see above the top wing. It may have been intended to cover the structure later for maximum performance to be attained. Long curved skids, similar to those used on the earlier biplane, were fitted, with a pair of castering wheels on diagonal spring struts.
The wings were of tapered form with rounded tips and were swept back at an angle of twenty degrees at the leading edge. The vertical pairs of interplane struts were closely spaced and allowed warping of a large portion of the trailing edge. The tail unit comprised three sets of divided rudders, with pairs of coupling rods top and bottom; the intermediate hinges being combined with the outboard pivots of the centrally mounted elevators.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 3ft 6in tapering to 2ft 3in
Area 130 sq ft
Gap 4ft
Weight allup 600lb
Macfie's entry for the Circuit of Britain of 1911 was built in three weeks and came out at Brooklands on 17 July 1911, but was damaged on its first attempt at taxiing. It seems that the center of gravity was too far forward, putting pressure on the skids, causing them to break and foul the propeller. Withdrawal from the contest resulted and no further attempt to rebuild the aircraft was made.
The intended 100hp ABC engine was not available in time and a 50hp Gnome was fitted instead. The fuselage was an open rectangular section, wooden, braced girder tapering in plan and elevation, but finishing at a vertical post well behind the tail unit. The fuselage was mounted centrally on struts between the wings, enabling the pilot to see above the top wing. It may have been intended to cover the structure later for maximum performance to be attained. Long curved skids, similar to those used on the earlier biplane, were fitted, with a pair of castering wheels on diagonal spring struts.
The wings were of tapered form with rounded tips and were swept back at an angle of twenty degrees at the leading edge. The vertical pairs of interplane struts were closely spaced and allowed warping of a large portion of the trailing edge. The tail unit comprised three sets of divided rudders, with pairs of coupling rods top and bottom; the intermediate hinges being combined with the outboard pivots of the centrally mounted elevators.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 3ft 6in tapering to 2ft 3in
Area 130 sq ft
Gap 4ft
Weight allup 600lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MACKENSIE-HUGHES triplane (E.S.B. Mackensie-Hughes and A.W. Smith, Barking)
This machine, made by A.W. Smith at Barking, arrived at Brooklands in June 1910 and was housed in shed No.22. It carried the name 'Britannia' in large letters on the fuselage sides, but was nicknamed 'The Staircase' by the Brooklands cynics. The machine failed to fly when first tested on 9 July 1910, or subsequently, being under-powered and too heavy. It was soon converted to become the Molesworth triplane (q.v.).
The mainplanes were staggered, with the middle one overlapping the trailing edge of the lowest by nine inches. The top plane was similarly placed above and behind the middle one. The center plane had a chord approximately double that of the others, and it carried ailerons in addition, hinged to the trailing edge. Three pairs of interplane struts of N-form spaced each pair of wings, which were braced to vertical kingposts, above and below the fuselage. The tailplane was also a staggered triplane unit, with elevators on the center panel. The rudder was forward of the tailplane unit, and was hinged on a vertical strut, also carrying the tail wheel below the fuselage. Lateral control was by sideways movement of the back of the seat; rudder and elevator control was by separate levers.
The fuselage, which was fabric covered, was a rectangular section, wooden girder tapering to a point at both front and rear, with the engine housed in a compartment just forward of the pilot. The engine drove the overlapping twin propellers, ahead of the nose through chains and long shafts. The undercarriage was a widely spaced arrangement of struts and twin skids with two pairs of wheels, sprung mounted, on separate axles.
Power: 20hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving twin metal propellers by chain and shafts at a reduction of 3 to 2, spaced at ninety degrees in overlapping planes.
Data
Span 23ft
Area 250 sq ft
Weight 600 lb
This machine, made by A.W. Smith at Barking, arrived at Brooklands in June 1910 and was housed in shed No.22. It carried the name 'Britannia' in large letters on the fuselage sides, but was nicknamed 'The Staircase' by the Brooklands cynics. The machine failed to fly when first tested on 9 July 1910, or subsequently, being under-powered and too heavy. It was soon converted to become the Molesworth triplane (q.v.).
The mainplanes were staggered, with the middle one overlapping the trailing edge of the lowest by nine inches. The top plane was similarly placed above and behind the middle one. The center plane had a chord approximately double that of the others, and it carried ailerons in addition, hinged to the trailing edge. Three pairs of interplane struts of N-form spaced each pair of wings, which were braced to vertical kingposts, above and below the fuselage. The tailplane was also a staggered triplane unit, with elevators on the center panel. The rudder was forward of the tailplane unit, and was hinged on a vertical strut, also carrying the tail wheel below the fuselage. Lateral control was by sideways movement of the back of the seat; rudder and elevator control was by separate levers.
The fuselage, which was fabric covered, was a rectangular section, wooden girder tapering to a point at both front and rear, with the engine housed in a compartment just forward of the pilot. The engine drove the overlapping twin propellers, ahead of the nose through chains and long shafts. The undercarriage was a widely spaced arrangement of struts and twin skids with two pairs of wheels, sprung mounted, on separate axles.
Power: 20hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving twin metal propellers by chain and shafts at a reduction of 3 to 2, spaced at ninety degrees in overlapping planes.
Data
Span 23ft
Area 250 sq ft
Weight 600 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MACKENZIE-OSBORNE multi-plane (Aubrey C. Mackenzie & Co., 21 Monks Road and Osborne Bros., Portland St., & Princess St., Lincoln)
A photograph of the partially assembled machine is the only illustration traced. Little is known of this machine, which was built at Princess St. and tested at Lincoln West Common in July 1910. The engine was a JAP two-cylinder and the span 21ft.
A photograph of the partially assembled machine is the only illustration traced. Little is known of this machine, which was built at Princess St. and tested at Lincoln West Common in July 1910. The engine was a JAP two-cylinder and the span 21ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MANN monoplane (G.B. Mann, Wolverhampton)
Mann, a member of the Midlands Aero Club, made a small monoplane which was present at Dunstall Park on 3 September 1910. The machine was in company with the Seddon biplane and was similarly constructed of steel tube, supplied by the local firm of Accles and Pollock. Several unsuccessful attempts at flight were reported.
Power: 18/20 or 25hp JAP driving a 6 or 7ft diameter propeller.
Data
Area 140 sq ft.
Mann, a member of the Midlands Aero Club, made a small monoplane which was present at Dunstall Park on 3 September 1910. The machine was in company with the Seddon biplane and was similarly constructed of steel tube, supplied by the local firm of Accles and Pollock. Several unsuccessful attempts at flight were reported.
Power: 18/20 or 25hp JAP driving a 6 or 7ft diameter propeller.
Data
Area 140 sq ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MANN & GRIMMER M.1 biplane (R. Frank Mann and Robert P. Grimmer, Arlington Rd., Surbiton, Surrey)
These partners had been involved since 1910 with models and gliders in the Arundel House School Aero Club. In August 1914 schemed the machine and in September they secured the support ofW.H. Bonham-Carter to finance the project. Construction then began in a disused church building in Surbiton and by the end of January the machine was taken to Hendon.
Rowland Ding made a short straight flight on 19 February 1915 and a circuit of ten minutes the following day. Inevitably a number of things needed to be changed, and after further trials in March, the machine was returned to Surbiton for major work, including the fitting of a more powerful engine, new undercarriage and rudder and general strengthening.
The machine was returned to Hendon at the end of June and housed in a tent, as no spare shed was available. On 3 July 1915 the seventh flight was made and only quick action by Ding prevented a collision with a Caudron when landing. On 1 August 1915 Ding made his last flight, disenchanted no doubt after a propeller shaft failure and other setbacks. Sydney Pickles took over and flew the aircraft for a total of three hours in August, before being forced to give up. An ex-RFC pilot, A.E. Barrs took over on 2 October 1915, and earned out a number of satisfactory flights until 16 October 1915, when the gearbox seized, resulting in a broken propeller and chain. As a result of this and the deteriorating condition of the machine, due to the poor accommodation, it was moved back to Surbiton and dismantled, having flown only 18 hours. An improved successor, identified as M.2A, was half built by March 1916 and a government contract for it had been received, nevertheless the financier withdrew his support, and the incomplete machine was sold to Bleriot Aeronautics at Brooklands. It was not developed.
The M. 1 was unusual in layout, being similar to a tractor biplane with a front mounted engine, but original in that the engine was reversed to drive a pair of pusher propellers, through shafts and chains behind the wings. The drive shaft from the engine passed under the cockpit to a gearbox, from which chains were taken out through the fuselage sides to sprockets on the propeller shafts. These revolved in bearings hung on cables and light struts between the wings. This flexible method of mounting was not satisfactory, and was replaced by substantial struts at the time of the engine change. The interplane struts of the two bay wings were also strengthened and streamlined at the same time. The original undercarriage, with twin skids and multiple struts, was changed for a simpler one of vee type. A larger rudder, with balance areas above and below the fuselage, was also fitted.
Power: 100 and 125hp Anzani ten-cylinder air-cooled radial driving twin pusher propellers by shaft, gearbox and chains.
These partners had been involved since 1910 with models and gliders in the Arundel House School Aero Club. In August 1914 schemed the machine and in September they secured the support ofW.H. Bonham-Carter to finance the project. Construction then began in a disused church building in Surbiton and by the end of January the machine was taken to Hendon.
Rowland Ding made a short straight flight on 19 February 1915 and a circuit of ten minutes the following day. Inevitably a number of things needed to be changed, and after further trials in March, the machine was returned to Surbiton for major work, including the fitting of a more powerful engine, new undercarriage and rudder and general strengthening.
The machine was returned to Hendon at the end of June and housed in a tent, as no spare shed was available. On 3 July 1915 the seventh flight was made and only quick action by Ding prevented a collision with a Caudron when landing. On 1 August 1915 Ding made his last flight, disenchanted no doubt after a propeller shaft failure and other setbacks. Sydney Pickles took over and flew the aircraft for a total of three hours in August, before being forced to give up. An ex-RFC pilot, A.E. Barrs took over on 2 October 1915, and earned out a number of satisfactory flights until 16 October 1915, when the gearbox seized, resulting in a broken propeller and chain. As a result of this and the deteriorating condition of the machine, due to the poor accommodation, it was moved back to Surbiton and dismantled, having flown only 18 hours. An improved successor, identified as M.2A, was half built by March 1916 and a government contract for it had been received, nevertheless the financier withdrew his support, and the incomplete machine was sold to Bleriot Aeronautics at Brooklands. It was not developed.
The M. 1 was unusual in layout, being similar to a tractor biplane with a front mounted engine, but original in that the engine was reversed to drive a pair of pusher propellers, through shafts and chains behind the wings. The drive shaft from the engine passed under the cockpit to a gearbox, from which chains were taken out through the fuselage sides to sprockets on the propeller shafts. These revolved in bearings hung on cables and light struts between the wings. This flexible method of mounting was not satisfactory, and was replaced by substantial struts at the time of the engine change. The interplane struts of the two bay wings were also strengthened and streamlined at the same time. The original undercarriage, with twin skids and multiple struts, was changed for a simpler one of vee type. A larger rudder, with balance areas above and below the fuselage, was also fitted.
Power: 100 and 125hp Anzani ten-cylinder air-cooled radial driving twin pusher propellers by shaft, gearbox and chains.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MANN & OVERTONS monoplane (Mann & Overtons Ltd., 15 Commercial Rd., Pimlico, London SW1)
This was one of three variants of the Santos Dumont Demoiselle which appeared at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910, this one built by a professional firm of coach builders.
The structure of three pine longerons was braced by oval steel tubes and wires. The steel tube undercarriage was unsprung, but relied on the pneumatic tires and the flexibility of the curved axle to cushion landing shocks. The wing had a large cutout at the center and was set at a considerable angle of incidence.
Flight and The Aero disagreed on the method of lateral control, The Aero stating that this was catered for by the dihedral, whereas Flight stated that the left hand lever operated both rudder and warp; the right hand lever controlled the elevator. The pilot sat low down in the fuselage, below the center section. The engine was mounted on a cast aluminum bracket on the front of the single top longeron, with a streamlined oil and fuel tank behind.
Power: 30hp Anzani three-cylinder fantype semi-radial driving a 6ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 18ft 4in (20ft *)
Chord 7ft
Length 20ft
Area 120 sq ft (133 sq ft *)
Area rudder 6 1/2 sq ft
Area elevator 16 sq ft
Weight 326 lb (340 lb*)
Weight allup 536 lb
Speed 45mph
Price .300
*alternative figures from The Aero.
This was one of three variants of the Santos Dumont Demoiselle which appeared at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910, this one built by a professional firm of coach builders.
The structure of three pine longerons was braced by oval steel tubes and wires. The steel tube undercarriage was unsprung, but relied on the pneumatic tires and the flexibility of the curved axle to cushion landing shocks. The wing had a large cutout at the center and was set at a considerable angle of incidence.
Flight and The Aero disagreed on the method of lateral control, The Aero stating that this was catered for by the dihedral, whereas Flight stated that the left hand lever operated both rudder and warp; the right hand lever controlled the elevator. The pilot sat low down in the fuselage, below the center section. The engine was mounted on a cast aluminum bracket on the front of the single top longeron, with a streamlined oil and fuel tank behind.
Power: 30hp Anzani three-cylinder fantype semi-radial driving a 6ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 18ft 4in (20ft *)
Chord 7ft
Length 20ft
Area 120 sq ft (133 sq ft *)
Area rudder 6 1/2 sq ft
Area elevator 16 sq ft
Weight 326 lb (340 lb*)
Weight allup 536 lb
Speed 45mph
Price .300
*alternative figures from The Aero.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MANNING-FLANDERS MF.l monoplane (W.O. Manning and Howard Flanders)
This aircraft is one that was not completed in 1910-1911, when it was originally conceived. The basis of it was apparently the Flanders F.l, which was abandoned in June 1910-1911 (q.v.) and which Flanders passed on to Manning, at the time when Manning was employed by the Coventry Ordnance Works. Pressure of work prevented Manning completing the design and construction, the aircraft being broken up at Battersea in 1912. A Crossley aero engine, intended to be fitted, was also not produced.
The was a conventional style tractor monoplane of the period, using a triangular section fuselage, uncovered behind the pilot. A central skid undercarriage and a cabane above the fuselage provided anchorages to brace the wings, which probably employed warping control in the original design.
However a replica aircraft based on some of the original drawings was built in 1974 by Personal Plane Services of White Waltham. The replica MF.l has flown successfully at intervals, including a Channel crossing in 1984, powered by a 65hp Continental flat four air-cooled engine.
This aircraft is one that was not completed in 1910-1911, when it was originally conceived. The basis of it was apparently the Flanders F.l, which was abandoned in June 1910-1911 (q.v.) and which Flanders passed on to Manning, at the time when Manning was employed by the Coventry Ordnance Works. Pressure of work prevented Manning completing the design and construction, the aircraft being broken up at Battersea in 1912. A Crossley aero engine, intended to be fitted, was also not produced.
The was a conventional style tractor monoplane of the period, using a triangular section fuselage, uncovered behind the pilot. A central skid undercarriage and a cabane above the fuselage provided anchorages to brace the wings, which probably employed warping control in the original design.
However a replica aircraft based on some of the original drawings was built in 1974 by Personal Plane Services of White Waltham. The replica MF.l has flown successfully at intervals, including a Channel crossing in 1984, powered by a 65hp Continental flat four air-cooled engine.
Manning-Flanders MF1. This is the 1974 replica of the abandoned design, made from the original drawings.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MARTIN & HANDASYDE aircraft (Helmuth Paul Martin and George Harris Handasyde)
From the beginning of their association in 1908 the partners built monoplanes and, for certain, from the second aircraft onwards, these owed much in their design to the Antoinette. Both partners names were used originally and were actually painted under the wings of No.3, but for convenience the name was later contracted to the more manageable 'Martinsyde'.
Martin was a director of the carburetor makers, Trier and Martin, and although a statement in the aviation Press, The Aero 28 June 1910 (p.512), denied the aviation connection with that company, the stand at Olympia in March 1911 was listed in that name. Trier and Martin were based at Trinity Works, New Church Rd., Camberwell, London SE and, until the partners became established at Brooklands in 1911, some of the early work took place there. At Brooklands the No.2 aircraft was housed in the original shed used by Paulhan's aircraft, but the new sheds were being built and soon Shed No. 12 in Swallow Lane was available and a second, No.29 adjacent to the Byfleet Banking in 1911. In 1914 two big hangars with curved roofs were built behind the Flying Village. In March 1915 large premises in Oriental Rd., Woking became the manufacturing center throughout the war period. The company went into receivership in November 1920.
It was just prior to the war in 1914 that the first Martinsyde biplane, a tractor type, was designed, which was the first type to be produced in quantity during the early part of the war.
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane No.1
Little information on this aircraft remains, but photographs show the general configuration. The aircraft was a tractor monoplane built in 1908-1909 with a triangular section open fuselage structure with the wing mounted on the top longerons. In its original form the chassis consisted of a single trailing wheel, centrally mounted, and outriggers. The wing had extended areas towards the tips, presumably for warping control. A Beeston-Humber car engine, although a water-cooled type, was arranged to run without a radiator by use of an exposed condensing header tank.
At a later stage major changes were made. The undercarriage became a more usual cross axle type with possibly rubber cord springing in the vertical members and a single curved skid supported at the fuselage nose. The overhung trailing edge of the wing was removed. The tail surfaces were now of elongated triangular shape, similar to those of an Antoinette.
The photograph of the first version shows the machine housed in a shed, later the assembled aircraft was in the ballroom of the Old Welsh Harp Inn. It was tested in a field nearby at Edgware, where the propeller disintegrated and tore the engine from its mountings. Thereafter repairs took place and the machine was moved to Handley Page's ground at Barking Creek. Martin just succeeded in lifting the machine off the ground and the partners were sufficiently encouraged to enter a meeting at Halifax. The machine was damaged on the train and finally wrecked in a gale which blew down the tent in which it was housed. The engine and parts were salvaged.
Power: 29hp Beeston-Humber four-cylinder inline car engine (12-14hp rated) driving a three-bladed propeller.
Data
Span 22ft
Root chord 5ft 6in
Tip chord 3ft
Weight 580 lb
From the beginning of their association in 1908 the partners built monoplanes and, for certain, from the second aircraft onwards, these owed much in their design to the Antoinette. Both partners names were used originally and were actually painted under the wings of No.3, but for convenience the name was later contracted to the more manageable 'Martinsyde'.
Martin was a director of the carburetor makers, Trier and Martin, and although a statement in the aviation Press, The Aero 28 June 1910 (p.512), denied the aviation connection with that company, the stand at Olympia in March 1911 was listed in that name. Trier and Martin were based at Trinity Works, New Church Rd., Camberwell, London SE and, until the partners became established at Brooklands in 1911, some of the early work took place there. At Brooklands the No.2 aircraft was housed in the original shed used by Paulhan's aircraft, but the new sheds were being built and soon Shed No. 12 in Swallow Lane was available and a second, No.29 adjacent to the Byfleet Banking in 1911. In 1914 two big hangars with curved roofs were built behind the Flying Village. In March 1915 large premises in Oriental Rd., Woking became the manufacturing center throughout the war period. The company went into receivership in November 1920.
It was just prior to the war in 1914 that the first Martinsyde biplane, a tractor type, was designed, which was the first type to be produced in quantity during the early part of the war.
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane No.1
Little information on this aircraft remains, but photographs show the general configuration. The aircraft was a tractor monoplane built in 1908-1909 with a triangular section open fuselage structure with the wing mounted on the top longerons. In its original form the chassis consisted of a single trailing wheel, centrally mounted, and outriggers. The wing had extended areas towards the tips, presumably for warping control. A Beeston-Humber car engine, although a water-cooled type, was arranged to run without a radiator by use of an exposed condensing header tank.
At a later stage major changes were made. The undercarriage became a more usual cross axle type with possibly rubber cord springing in the vertical members and a single curved skid supported at the fuselage nose. The overhung trailing edge of the wing was removed. The tail surfaces were now of elongated triangular shape, similar to those of an Antoinette.
The photograph of the first version shows the machine housed in a shed, later the assembled aircraft was in the ballroom of the Old Welsh Harp Inn. It was tested in a field nearby at Edgware, where the propeller disintegrated and tore the engine from its mountings. Thereafter repairs took place and the machine was moved to Handley Page's ground at Barking Creek. Martin just succeeded in lifting the machine off the ground and the partners were sufficiently encouraged to enter a meeting at Halifax. The machine was damaged on the train and finally wrecked in a gale which blew down the tent in which it was housed. The engine and parts were salvaged.
Power: 29hp Beeston-Humber four-cylinder inline car engine (12-14hp rated) driving a three-bladed propeller.
Data
Span 22ft
Root chord 5ft 6in
Tip chord 3ft
Weight 580 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane No.2
The second monoplane was again built in the ballroom at Hendon and fitted with the original Humber engine. It was reported by The Aero, 24 May 1910 (p.407), to be nearly ready for trials in shed No. 12 at Brooklands.
The layout, similar to the earlier monoplane, was given greater wing area and the fuselage was strengthened with a three-ply wood covering throughout. The undercarriage was mounted on a single post, which also extended upwards, and together with kingposts at mid-span, provided anchorages for the bracing wires and pivots for the warping cables. The wheels, on separate half axles, were sprung by a laminated wooden spring. A tail-skid was supported by the rudder post, although the machine normally rested on the nose skid.
It is uncertain whether the machine actually flew with the Humber engine, but a 40hp side valve JAP had later been fitted and, on 15 June 1910, Martin lifted the machine off the ground. Tests continued until 30 July 1910 when it crashed heavily. It was not flown again until Martin took it out on 10 October 1910 and later that month was reported to have covered 300 yards. Graham Gilmour flew the aircraft on 2 November 1910, but disliked the Antoinette type separate hand wheel controls. He had these modified and retested the aircraft on 12 November 1910, when its identity was changed to No.3.
Power:
29hp Beeston-Humber four-cylinder inline car engine driving a Curva propeller.
40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data
Span 32ft
Root chord 6ft
Tip chord 4ft
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane No.3
When the Antoinette type controls of No.2 were criticized by Graham Gilmour and changed to a central stick for the elevator, but with a wheel to control wing waiping, the rudder bar was retained. A large metal shield was attached to the stick to protect the pilot from the large amount of oil emitted by the JAP engine, which had auxiliary exhaust ports drilled in the cylinder walls. An extended fin and a rudder with squarecut trailing edge were now fitted.
Gilmour expressed himself as very satisfied with the controls and stability of the aircraft and the general strength of its construction. He seems to have 'acquired' the aircraft, his name appearing on the rudder and 'No.3 Martin-Handasyde' under the wings.
A wing tip was damaged when the machine was taken out by him on 8 November 1910, but it was flying well on the 12 November 1910. In the following weeks the engine was changed for the 35hp ohv JAP from the Bleriot 'Big Bat', and Gilmour flew with this for the first time on 11 December 1910. Sopwith tested the machine in the middle of February as a potential purchaser of the next machine already in the course of construction. Soon after this, in April or May, a 35hp Green was fitted for a short time, which involved the fitting of a sloping radiator behind the engine. By the 4 June 1911 a JAP engine had been reinstalled and pilot E.V.B. Fisher was still being blinded by the oil. The following day the machine was damaged by falling timber when Latham crashed on the roof of shed No.29, where the machine was housed. It is uncertain whether No.3 flew again, nevertheless it was still virtually intact in August 1914.
Power:
40hp JAP eight-cylinder side valve air-cooled vee driving a 7ft diameter propeller.
35hp JAP eight-cylinder ohv air-cooled vee.
35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 6ft 2in reducing to 5ft at tips
Length 28ft
Area 175 sq ft
Area tailplane 19 sq ft
Area elevators 6 sq ft
Area rudder 8 sq ft
Area fin 8 sq ft
Weight 560 lb
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane No.4B Dragonfly
Flight reported on 4 February 1911 (p.40), the advanced state of construction of a new two-seater with Gnome engine, purchased by Tom Sopwith, while The Aero 8 March 1911 (p. 193) referred to two machines in course of construction, the first to be fitted with a Gnome.
Sopwith was out on a Martin-Handasyde aircraft several times in February culminating with one flight on 22 February 1911, when the machine tipped on its nose, but this was on No.3 and No.4B seems to have been sent to Olympia for the Aero Show opening on the 24 March 1911, unflown. After the show closed, the machine was assembled in time for Sopwith to fly it on the 17 April 1911, but a wing was damaged when landing. Sopwith was soon to leave for his American tour and, with insufficient time to repair the Dragonfly before he left, he was forced to look elsewhere for a suitable aircraft to take. The machine remained with the firm and never became Sopwith's property.
The Gnome was of inadequate power and was replaced by an Antoinette provided by Hubert Latham, who became interested in the aircraft during his visit to Brooklands in May.
The new engine was installed and Radley tested the aircraft on 14 June 1911, followed by Morison on 19 July 1911 after the wing had been reconstructed; Gilmour, Fisher and Hamel also flew the aircraft in July but, on 23 July 1911, Morison crashed badly near the sewage farm and the machine was not rebuilt. There is no evidence that a second machine of the same type was built.
No.4B followed the general pattern of its predecessor, but was larger for passenger work. The undercarriage still consisted of hinged half axles connected to a sliding central fitting, but rubber cords in tension replaced the laminated wooden spring used earlier.
Power:
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
65hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 37ft
Chord 6ft (average)
Length 33ft
Area 240 sq ft
Weight 800 lb
Speed 60mph
Price .1,100
Data for aircraft with Gnome
The second monoplane was again built in the ballroom at Hendon and fitted with the original Humber engine. It was reported by The Aero, 24 May 1910 (p.407), to be nearly ready for trials in shed No. 12 at Brooklands.
The layout, similar to the earlier monoplane, was given greater wing area and the fuselage was strengthened with a three-ply wood covering throughout. The undercarriage was mounted on a single post, which also extended upwards, and together with kingposts at mid-span, provided anchorages for the bracing wires and pivots for the warping cables. The wheels, on separate half axles, were sprung by a laminated wooden spring. A tail-skid was supported by the rudder post, although the machine normally rested on the nose skid.
It is uncertain whether the machine actually flew with the Humber engine, but a 40hp side valve JAP had later been fitted and, on 15 June 1910, Martin lifted the machine off the ground. Tests continued until 30 July 1910 when it crashed heavily. It was not flown again until Martin took it out on 10 October 1910 and later that month was reported to have covered 300 yards. Graham Gilmour flew the aircraft on 2 November 1910, but disliked the Antoinette type separate hand wheel controls. He had these modified and retested the aircraft on 12 November 1910, when its identity was changed to No.3.
Power:
29hp Beeston-Humber four-cylinder inline car engine driving a Curva propeller.
40hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee.
Data
Span 32ft
Root chord 6ft
Tip chord 4ft
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane No.3
When the Antoinette type controls of No.2 were criticized by Graham Gilmour and changed to a central stick for the elevator, but with a wheel to control wing waiping, the rudder bar was retained. A large metal shield was attached to the stick to protect the pilot from the large amount of oil emitted by the JAP engine, which had auxiliary exhaust ports drilled in the cylinder walls. An extended fin and a rudder with squarecut trailing edge were now fitted.
Gilmour expressed himself as very satisfied with the controls and stability of the aircraft and the general strength of its construction. He seems to have 'acquired' the aircraft, his name appearing on the rudder and 'No.3 Martin-Handasyde' under the wings.
A wing tip was damaged when the machine was taken out by him on 8 November 1910, but it was flying well on the 12 November 1910. In the following weeks the engine was changed for the 35hp ohv JAP from the Bleriot 'Big Bat', and Gilmour flew with this for the first time on 11 December 1910. Sopwith tested the machine in the middle of February as a potential purchaser of the next machine already in the course of construction. Soon after this, in April or May, a 35hp Green was fitted for a short time, which involved the fitting of a sloping radiator behind the engine. By the 4 June 1911 a JAP engine had been reinstalled and pilot E.V.B. Fisher was still being blinded by the oil. The following day the machine was damaged by falling timber when Latham crashed on the roof of shed No.29, where the machine was housed. It is uncertain whether No.3 flew again, nevertheless it was still virtually intact in August 1914.
Power:
40hp JAP eight-cylinder side valve air-cooled vee driving a 7ft diameter propeller.
35hp JAP eight-cylinder ohv air-cooled vee.
35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 32ft
Chord 6ft 2in reducing to 5ft at tips
Length 28ft
Area 175 sq ft
Area tailplane 19 sq ft
Area elevators 6 sq ft
Area rudder 8 sq ft
Area fin 8 sq ft
Weight 560 lb
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane No.4B Dragonfly
Flight reported on 4 February 1911 (p.40), the advanced state of construction of a new two-seater with Gnome engine, purchased by Tom Sopwith, while The Aero 8 March 1911 (p. 193) referred to two machines in course of construction, the first to be fitted with a Gnome.
Sopwith was out on a Martin-Handasyde aircraft several times in February culminating with one flight on 22 February 1911, when the machine tipped on its nose, but this was on No.3 and No.4B seems to have been sent to Olympia for the Aero Show opening on the 24 March 1911, unflown. After the show closed, the machine was assembled in time for Sopwith to fly it on the 17 April 1911, but a wing was damaged when landing. Sopwith was soon to leave for his American tour and, with insufficient time to repair the Dragonfly before he left, he was forced to look elsewhere for a suitable aircraft to take. The machine remained with the firm and never became Sopwith's property.
The Gnome was of inadequate power and was replaced by an Antoinette provided by Hubert Latham, who became interested in the aircraft during his visit to Brooklands in May.
The new engine was installed and Radley tested the aircraft on 14 June 1911, followed by Morison on 19 July 1911 after the wing had been reconstructed; Gilmour, Fisher and Hamel also flew the aircraft in July but, on 23 July 1911, Morison crashed badly near the sewage farm and the machine was not rebuilt. There is no evidence that a second machine of the same type was built.
No.4B followed the general pattern of its predecessor, but was larger for passenger work. The undercarriage still consisted of hinged half axles connected to a sliding central fitting, but rubber cords in tension replaced the laminated wooden spring used earlier.
Power:
50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
65hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 37ft
Chord 6ft (average)
Length 33ft
Area 240 sq ft
Weight 800 lb
Speed 60mph
Price .1,100
Data for aircraft with Gnome
Martin-Handasyde monoplane No.2, built at Hendon and tested at Brooklands, was much like an Antoinette including the control system.
This view of the fuselage of No.2 shows the Antoinette-type controls and the side valve JAP engine in use in 1910.
Martin-Handasyde monoplane No.4B Dragonfly at Olympia in March 1911 was fitted with a Gnome engine later replaced by an Antoinette.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane (No.5)
The next monoplane to appear followed the same general pattern of No.4 with an Antoinette engine, necessitating the long condensing radiator along the fuselage. It was a natural evolution of the type and was designed from its inception to use the Antoinette engine, the production of which was unexpectedly terminated soon after.
Improvements had been made to the cowling of the engine and decking. The undercarriage was of a strengthened type, to that previously used, but still with hinged half axles connected to a sliding central fitting and sprung by four rubber cords in tension.
The machine still adopted a nose down attitude on the ground until loaded. The plywood shell of the rear fuselage was cut away forming diamond shapes, visible through the fabric, a feature peculiar to this machine. A new shape of fin and rudder, with curved outlines was used.
The first flight was made by Tom Sopwith on 13 November 1911 and he piloted the machine on successive flights until 31 December 1911, when he flew to St Albans, damaging the propeller and undercarriage on landing. The machine was taken by road back to Hendon, where repairs were made and it was then flown back to Brooklands on 31 January 1912 by Graham Gilmour. New wings were fitted and Gilmour tested these on 13 February 1912. On 17 February 1912 he left Brooklands to fly over London. Following the Thames, in snow and freezing conditions, he was forced to land, but crashed fatally in the Old Deer Park at Richmond. The cause of the crash was not determined, although some onlookers reported that a wing broke off.
Note. This and subsequent monoplanes were not given type numbers at the time but are given numbers here for convenience only. The 'Aeroplane' referred to this machine at the time as the 'Magnificent Martinsyde'.
Power: 65hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
No data available but probably similar to No.4. One aircraft only built.
The next monoplane to appear followed the same general pattern of No.4 with an Antoinette engine, necessitating the long condensing radiator along the fuselage. It was a natural evolution of the type and was designed from its inception to use the Antoinette engine, the production of which was unexpectedly terminated soon after.
Improvements had been made to the cowling of the engine and decking. The undercarriage was of a strengthened type, to that previously used, but still with hinged half axles connected to a sliding central fitting and sprung by four rubber cords in tension.
The machine still adopted a nose down attitude on the ground until loaded. The plywood shell of the rear fuselage was cut away forming diamond shapes, visible through the fabric, a feature peculiar to this machine. A new shape of fin and rudder, with curved outlines was used.
The first flight was made by Tom Sopwith on 13 November 1911 and he piloted the machine on successive flights until 31 December 1911, when he flew to St Albans, damaging the propeller and undercarriage on landing. The machine was taken by road back to Hendon, where repairs were made and it was then flown back to Brooklands on 31 January 1912 by Graham Gilmour. New wings were fitted and Gilmour tested these on 13 February 1912. On 17 February 1912 he left Brooklands to fly over London. Following the Thames, in snow and freezing conditions, he was forced to land, but crashed fatally in the Old Deer Park at Richmond. The cause of the crash was not determined, although some onlookers reported that a wing broke off.
Note. This and subsequent monoplanes were not given type numbers at the time but are given numbers here for convenience only. The 'Aeroplane' referred to this machine at the time as the 'Magnificent Martinsyde'.
Power: 65hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
No data available but probably similar to No.4. One aircraft only built.
Martin-Handasyde monoplane No.5 built in 1911 crashed at Richmond with fatal results to Graham Gilmour in February 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplanes (No.6) and variants 1912-1914
After the loss of Gilmour in No.5, there were no reports of flying by Martinsyde until 27 June 1912, when Gordon Bell flew a new monoplane with Antoinette engine. This was soon followed by a different type of monoplane, designed specifically for the Military Trials of August 1912, (No.7) and so for the first time two Martin and Handasyde aircraft were flying at Brooklands.
Some confusion can arise from the lack of clarity of the early reports and from the use of the description 'Military Monoplane' for (No.6) at present under consideration. This arose from a War Office contract reported to be for four aircraft, against which (No.6) was the first to be built. The need for a separate design probably arose when the conditions of use were made known later.
These aircraft were being produced at the time of a number of disasters to monoplanes of various types, which resulted in the War Office ban on their use by the RFC and although it is possible that two Martin and Handasyde monoplanes were delivered to Farnborough, they were not used by the Service, one actually being used as a gunnery target at Shoeburyness.
The company was greatly committed to the monoplane design, notwithstanding the loss of Gilmour on (No.5) and the War Office ban, they continued to develop and fly variants of the type into early 1914. There were several setbacks along the way, including the fatal crash of Edward Petre in gusty weather at Marske on 24 December 1912, on the Antoinette powered aircraft completed the month before. The accident report stated that the wings collapsed, and suggested an investigation into the design was required. Although the firm disagreed with this finding a change to box type spars was made in a new machine with Laviator engine described in February, prior to its appearance at Olympia in March 1913 on the stand of T.B. Andre and Co., the successors of Trier and Martin as selling agents. This engine was unsatisfactory and was changed for an Austro-Daimler in April, and the aircraft was then flown by Gordon Bell on 8 May 1913 for the first time. In his hands it was remarkably maneuverable and achieved speeds up to 82mph, but Bell overdid the aerobatics on returning from Eastchurch to Brooklands on 13 June 1913 and the machine was destroyed and the passenger killed.
A further Austro-Daimler powered machine was flying at Brooklands in September 1913, in the hands of Barnwell, who competed in races at Brooklands in it and in the Aerial Derby, where he obtained second place at a speed of 72.5 mph over ninety-five miles.
The last monoplane to be completed flew in February 1914 and may have been intended to become a floatplane. This again had an Austro-Daimler engine and was flown by Barnwell initially, and later by R.R. Skene and V. Waterfall. The machine was at Shoreham at the outbreak of war and was commandeered by government officials, but apparently was not flown again.
No doubt these machines incorporated many improvements, and there are few features to distinguish one from the other, also contemporary information is sparse. Apart from the engine changes, there were less obvious alterations, such as the large-scale use of duralumin in parts of the structure, and changes to the undercarriage springing by enclosing the rubber springing inside the central tube. Serial No.278 was one RFC machine which had rubber cord springing on the diagonal arms, as on the Military Trials aircraft.
In some cases the extent of the plywood covering, or reinforcing, of the rear fuselage was varied. The 1913 Show machine seems to have fabric over the girder only in this area, whereas the 1913 Aerial Derby machine had plywood and a small area only covered by fabric.
The last two Austro-Daimler machines rested on their tailskids, when on the ground, indicating a change to the weight distribution. Particular attention was paid to the final machine, which had fairings added to the undercarriage and bracing posts, together with improved cowlings and decking. A fore and aft strut connected the lower ends of the kingposts at mid-span. Two pairs of new wings tried in June proved to be disappointing.
Power:
65hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee. Probably used in three aircraft.
80hp Laviator (Dansette-Gillet system) eight-cylinder water-cooled vee. Used in one aircraft only, replaced by an Austro-Daimler.
120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline watercooled, probably used in 3 aircraft.
Data
Span 42ft 6in
Chord 7ft
Length 35ft 4in
Propeller 8ft 10in diameter Regy
Area 286 sq ft
Weight 1,100lb
Weight allup 1,760lb
Data is for 1913 Show machine with Laviator.
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane (No.7) Military Trials type
This machine was one of two flying at Brooklands in mid-July 1912, but it left by road for Larkhill on 20 July 1912. Although it was apparently satisfactory at Brooklands, the aircraft was soon let down by its engine at Larkhill and, apart from completing the assembly test, made only one or two flights in windy conditions. In addition the aircraft was overweight.
There were a few features to distinguish the Military Trials machine from the No.6 type. The Chenu engine incorporated a two to one reduction gear and drove a four-bladed propeller. The coolant radiator was shaped in the form of a saddle and fitted on top of the fuselage above the wing. The main undercarriage post, and the kingposts, were enclosed in streamlined fairings, however four rubber spring cords were now incorporated in both diagonal arms and these remained exposed. The object of the stronger springing being to satisfy the ploughed field case, specified in the rules of the contest. A propeller-driven pump to pressurize the main fuel tank was mounted on the undercarriage vertical post.
After the Trials the Chenu engine was replaced with an Antoinette and Petre continued flying the aircraft until it is believed to have been wrecked on 24 October 1912, after a forced landing.
Power:
75hp Chenu six-cylinder inline incorporating a 2 to 1 reduction gear.
65hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 42ft 6in (Flight 42ft)
Length 38ft
Area 310sqft
Weight 1,250lb
Weight allup 1,800lb
Speed 75mph
MARTIN-HANDASYDE Waterbus monoplane
This machine was reported to be under construction at Brooklands in 1913. It was not completed as a seaplane, with proposed center float and balancing floats at the kingposts, but may have been completed as the last land-plane of (No.6) type in 1914. Ailerons were to be fitted instead of wing warping.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
After the loss of Gilmour in No.5, there were no reports of flying by Martinsyde until 27 June 1912, when Gordon Bell flew a new monoplane with Antoinette engine. This was soon followed by a different type of monoplane, designed specifically for the Military Trials of August 1912, (No.7) and so for the first time two Martin and Handasyde aircraft were flying at Brooklands.
Some confusion can arise from the lack of clarity of the early reports and from the use of the description 'Military Monoplane' for (No.6) at present under consideration. This arose from a War Office contract reported to be for four aircraft, against which (No.6) was the first to be built. The need for a separate design probably arose when the conditions of use were made known later.
These aircraft were being produced at the time of a number of disasters to monoplanes of various types, which resulted in the War Office ban on their use by the RFC and although it is possible that two Martin and Handasyde monoplanes were delivered to Farnborough, they were not used by the Service, one actually being used as a gunnery target at Shoeburyness.
The company was greatly committed to the monoplane design, notwithstanding the loss of Gilmour on (No.5) and the War Office ban, they continued to develop and fly variants of the type into early 1914. There were several setbacks along the way, including the fatal crash of Edward Petre in gusty weather at Marske on 24 December 1912, on the Antoinette powered aircraft completed the month before. The accident report stated that the wings collapsed, and suggested an investigation into the design was required. Although the firm disagreed with this finding a change to box type spars was made in a new machine with Laviator engine described in February, prior to its appearance at Olympia in March 1913 on the stand of T.B. Andre and Co., the successors of Trier and Martin as selling agents. This engine was unsatisfactory and was changed for an Austro-Daimler in April, and the aircraft was then flown by Gordon Bell on 8 May 1913 for the first time. In his hands it was remarkably maneuverable and achieved speeds up to 82mph, but Bell overdid the aerobatics on returning from Eastchurch to Brooklands on 13 June 1913 and the machine was destroyed and the passenger killed.
A further Austro-Daimler powered machine was flying at Brooklands in September 1913, in the hands of Barnwell, who competed in races at Brooklands in it and in the Aerial Derby, where he obtained second place at a speed of 72.5 mph over ninety-five miles.
The last monoplane to be completed flew in February 1914 and may have been intended to become a floatplane. This again had an Austro-Daimler engine and was flown by Barnwell initially, and later by R.R. Skene and V. Waterfall. The machine was at Shoreham at the outbreak of war and was commandeered by government officials, but apparently was not flown again.
No doubt these machines incorporated many improvements, and there are few features to distinguish one from the other, also contemporary information is sparse. Apart from the engine changes, there were less obvious alterations, such as the large-scale use of duralumin in parts of the structure, and changes to the undercarriage springing by enclosing the rubber springing inside the central tube. Serial No.278 was one RFC machine which had rubber cord springing on the diagonal arms, as on the Military Trials aircraft.
In some cases the extent of the plywood covering, or reinforcing, of the rear fuselage was varied. The 1913 Show machine seems to have fabric over the girder only in this area, whereas the 1913 Aerial Derby machine had plywood and a small area only covered by fabric.
The last two Austro-Daimler machines rested on their tailskids, when on the ground, indicating a change to the weight distribution. Particular attention was paid to the final machine, which had fairings added to the undercarriage and bracing posts, together with improved cowlings and decking. A fore and aft strut connected the lower ends of the kingposts at mid-span. Two pairs of new wings tried in June proved to be disappointing.
Power:
65hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee. Probably used in three aircraft.
80hp Laviator (Dansette-Gillet system) eight-cylinder water-cooled vee. Used in one aircraft only, replaced by an Austro-Daimler.
120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline watercooled, probably used in 3 aircraft.
Data
Span 42ft 6in
Chord 7ft
Length 35ft 4in
Propeller 8ft 10in diameter Regy
Area 286 sq ft
Weight 1,100lb
Weight allup 1,760lb
Data is for 1913 Show machine with Laviator.
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane (No.7) Military Trials type
This machine was one of two flying at Brooklands in mid-July 1912, but it left by road for Larkhill on 20 July 1912. Although it was apparently satisfactory at Brooklands, the aircraft was soon let down by its engine at Larkhill and, apart from completing the assembly test, made only one or two flights in windy conditions. In addition the aircraft was overweight.
There were a few features to distinguish the Military Trials machine from the No.6 type. The Chenu engine incorporated a two to one reduction gear and drove a four-bladed propeller. The coolant radiator was shaped in the form of a saddle and fitted on top of the fuselage above the wing. The main undercarriage post, and the kingposts, were enclosed in streamlined fairings, however four rubber spring cords were now incorporated in both diagonal arms and these remained exposed. The object of the stronger springing being to satisfy the ploughed field case, specified in the rules of the contest. A propeller-driven pump to pressurize the main fuel tank was mounted on the undercarriage vertical post.
After the Trials the Chenu engine was replaced with an Antoinette and Petre continued flying the aircraft until it is believed to have been wrecked on 24 October 1912, after a forced landing.
Power:
75hp Chenu six-cylinder inline incorporating a 2 to 1 reduction gear.
65hp Antoinette eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Data
Span 42ft 6in (Flight 42ft)
Length 38ft
Area 310sqft
Weight 1,250lb
Weight allup 1,800lb
Speed 75mph
MARTIN-HANDASYDE Waterbus monoplane
This machine was reported to be under construction at Brooklands in 1913. It was not completed as a seaplane, with proposed center float and balancing floats at the kingposts, but may have been completed as the last land-plane of (No.6) type in 1914. Ailerons were to be fitted instead of wing warping.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler eight-cylinder water-cooled vee.
Martin-Handasyde produced two machines for the Military Trials. This version had an Antoinette engine.
Martin-Handasyde produced two machines for the Military Trials. This version was fitted with the unsatisfactory Chenu engine, the other had an Antoinette.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MARTIN-HANDASYDE pusher biplane
This aircraft was being built in the spring of 1914, and was entered for the Aerial Derby starting at Hendon on 6 June 1914 to be flown by Guy Blatherwick. The machine was not completed in time and construction seems to have been abandoned. A silhouette by Geoffrey Watson, and a brief description, showed a typical pusher biplane of the time, with tail unit carried on booms converging together in plan. The wings were of unequal span, the top having considerable overhang. A 65hp Antoinette engine was mounted in the rear of the nacelle. Steel tubing was used in the construction of the booms and the undercarriage.
This aircraft was being built in the spring of 1914, and was entered for the Aerial Derby starting at Hendon on 6 June 1914 to be flown by Guy Blatherwick. The machine was not completed in time and construction seems to have been abandoned. A silhouette by Geoffrey Watson, and a brief description, showed a typical pusher biplane of the time, with tail unit carried on booms converging together in plan. The wings were of unequal span, the top having considerable overhang. A 65hp Antoinette engine was mounted in the rear of the nacelle. Steel tubing was used in the construction of the booms and the undercarriage.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MARTIN-HANDASYDE S.l biplane
The first biplane made by the firm, produced in any numbers, was a small single-seater scout, similar in layout to the Sopwith Tabloid and Bristol Scout. Delivery of eleven aircraft was made to the RFC by the end of 1914, and production continued well into 1915.
The machine was a single bay biplane with ailerons on all wings. The early examples had a robust undercarriage of four struts and twin skids, with small wheels at the tips of the skids. The aircraft rested on the rear of the skids when on the ground. Later the undercarriage was changed to a conventional vee type with tail-skid. A peculiar feature was the use of external joint plates for the strut connections. A Lewis gun could be mounted on the top central section, some aircraft being so fitted in the early war years.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 27ft 8in
Chord 4ft 9in
Gap 4ft 6in
Length 21ft
Area 280 sq ft
Area tailplane 20 sq ft
Area elevators 13 1/3 sq ft
Area rudder 5 1/3 sq ft
Area fin 2 1/2 sq ft
Area ailerons 28 sq ft
Speed 87mph
The first biplane made by the firm, produced in any numbers, was a small single-seater scout, similar in layout to the Sopwith Tabloid and Bristol Scout. Delivery of eleven aircraft was made to the RFC by the end of 1914, and production continued well into 1915.
The machine was a single bay biplane with ailerons on all wings. The early examples had a robust undercarriage of four struts and twin skids, with small wheels at the tips of the skids. The aircraft rested on the rear of the skids when on the ground. Later the undercarriage was changed to a conventional vee type with tail-skid. A peculiar feature was the use of external joint plates for the strut connections. A Lewis gun could be mounted on the top central section, some aircraft being so fitted in the early war years.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary.
Data
Span 27ft 8in
Chord 4ft 9in
Gap 4ft 6in
Length 21ft
Area 280 sq ft
Area tailplane 20 sq ft
Area elevators 13 1/3 sq ft
Area rudder 5 1/3 sq ft
Area fin 2 1/2 sq ft
Area ailerons 28 sq ft
Speed 87mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MARTIN-HANDASYDE Transatlantic monoplane
The partners last monoplane was designed for the sole purpose of competing for the .10,000 Prize offered by the Daily Mail for an Atlantic crossing by air. The machine was sponsored by Canadian financier, E. Mackay Edgar, and was to be flown by Gustav Hamel. He was unfortunately lost in the Channel on 23 May 1914, when the machine was well advanced in construction.
Although superficially an enlarged version of earlier types, the Transatlantic monoplane incorporated a number of original features. The fuselage girder was still of triangular section with the center portion, some fourteen feet in length, enclosed by watertight bulkheads to ensure flotation should the need arise. The engine compartment, with frontal radiator, was cowled in the usual manner and the rear fuselage was fabric covered. A fuel tank of cylindrical shape, 9ft long by 3ft diameter, was housed in the front of the enclosed section, with the two crew members seated side by side behind. The top decking was continuous from the nose of the machine and faired out just behind the cockpit.
The wings were built in four sections. The front and rear spars of the center portions extended above and below the top longerons respectively, to meet on the aircraft center line. The outer wings continued the tapered plan form and included the warping area of the trailing edge portion. Balanced tail surfaces were employed, the large combined tailplane and elevators forming a semicircle.
Struts forming a vee-shape, at both front and rear spar stations provided anchorages for the extensive bracing system and the warping control. The lower pylons, and a similar one below the nose, supported the central skid. The wheels were mounted on separate struts to points at the top longerons, and the whole undercarriage was arranged to be dropped after take off, leaving the central skid for the landing with balancing skids under the mid-span kingposts.
Construction of the machine continued with the possibility of another pilot taking on the task, but inevitably the project was abandoned with the outbreak of war.
Power: 215hp Sunbeam twelve-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a 12ft diameter Lang four-bladed propeller.
Data
Span 66ft
Chord 14ft 6in tapering to 10ft 6in
Length 46ft 4in
Area 770 sq ft
Weight 2,4001b
Weight allup 4,800lb
Speed 80-85 mph
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane
Flight 7 August 1914 (p.842) reported that drawings of a large new monoplane were being prepared. It was to follow the general lines of its predecessors, but the pilot was placed far back and the passenger forward with good vision over the leading edge of the wings. The aircraft was not proceeded with.
The partners last monoplane was designed for the sole purpose of competing for the .10,000 Prize offered by the Daily Mail for an Atlantic crossing by air. The machine was sponsored by Canadian financier, E. Mackay Edgar, and was to be flown by Gustav Hamel. He was unfortunately lost in the Channel on 23 May 1914, when the machine was well advanced in construction.
Although superficially an enlarged version of earlier types, the Transatlantic monoplane incorporated a number of original features. The fuselage girder was still of triangular section with the center portion, some fourteen feet in length, enclosed by watertight bulkheads to ensure flotation should the need arise. The engine compartment, with frontal radiator, was cowled in the usual manner and the rear fuselage was fabric covered. A fuel tank of cylindrical shape, 9ft long by 3ft diameter, was housed in the front of the enclosed section, with the two crew members seated side by side behind. The top decking was continuous from the nose of the machine and faired out just behind the cockpit.
The wings were built in four sections. The front and rear spars of the center portions extended above and below the top longerons respectively, to meet on the aircraft center line. The outer wings continued the tapered plan form and included the warping area of the trailing edge portion. Balanced tail surfaces were employed, the large combined tailplane and elevators forming a semicircle.
Struts forming a vee-shape, at both front and rear spar stations provided anchorages for the extensive bracing system and the warping control. The lower pylons, and a similar one below the nose, supported the central skid. The wheels were mounted on separate struts to points at the top longerons, and the whole undercarriage was arranged to be dropped after take off, leaving the central skid for the landing with balancing skids under the mid-span kingposts.
Construction of the machine continued with the possibility of another pilot taking on the task, but inevitably the project was abandoned with the outbreak of war.
Power: 215hp Sunbeam twelve-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a 12ft diameter Lang four-bladed propeller.
Data
Span 66ft
Chord 14ft 6in tapering to 10ft 6in
Length 46ft 4in
Area 770 sq ft
Weight 2,4001b
Weight allup 4,800lb
Speed 80-85 mph
MARTIN-HANDASYDE monoplane
Flight 7 August 1914 (p.842) reported that drawings of a large new monoplane were being prepared. It was to follow the general lines of its predecessors, but the pilot was placed far back and the passenger forward with good vision over the leading edge of the wings. The aircraft was not proceeded with.
The fuselage of the immense Martinsyde monoplane, showing central sections of wings in place. The wing extensions are considerably larger than these centre parts of the planes, to which they are secured by means of the lugs seen in the photograph. The wing and rudder of the Transatlantic monoplane were actually completed at Brooklands.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MAUND monoplane (A.V. Maund, Market St., Craven Arms, later Shifnal, Shropshire)
Maund was a cycle dealer who built a monoplane, which received a mention in 1910, but presumably failed to achieve successful flight, as nothing further was reported.
The photographs that exist show a monoplane with wings mounted at the top longerons, a triangular section fuselage, with a trailing fork undercarriage of welded steel tube, fitted with twin skids. The vee-twin engine, probably a JAP motorcycle engine, no doubt gave insufficient power for flight to be achieved.
Maund was a cycle dealer who built a monoplane, which received a mention in 1910, but presumably failed to achieve successful flight, as nothing further was reported.
The photographs that exist show a monoplane with wings mounted at the top longerons, a triangular section fuselage, with a trailing fork undercarriage of welded steel tube, fitted with twin skids. The vee-twin engine, probably a JAP motorcycle engine, no doubt gave insufficient power for flight to be achieved.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MAXFIELD biplane (Alfred P. Maxfield, Gosta Green, Birmingham)
A motor engineer who experimented from 1902, Maxfield described in 1909, in a letter with sketches to The Aero, a biplane with an unusual central portion to the top and bottom wings. These were made in overlapping segments and able to flap to assist lift at takeoff and landing, and could assist control in flight. The machine had a biplane tail, and biplane front elevators carried on booms, and was propelled by a six-cylinder engine driving a pusher propeller. The design was superseded by a monoplane later that year.
A motor engineer who experimented from 1902, Maxfield described in 1909, in a letter with sketches to The Aero, a biplane with an unusual central portion to the top and bottom wings. These were made in overlapping segments and able to flap to assist lift at takeoff and landing, and could assist control in flight. The machine had a biplane tail, and biplane front elevators carried on booms, and was propelled by a six-cylinder engine driving a pusher propeller. The design was superseded by a monoplane later that year.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MAXFIELD monoplane
This was probably the first aeroplane to fly in the Midlands on 24 September 1909, confirmed again by witnesses on 30 September 1909, at Castle Bromwich Golf Links. The flights were at low height and of short duration.
The machine had a fuselage and undercarriage made of cycle tubing and was mounted on three cycle wheels, the front pair being steerable. A biplane front elevator and biplane tail with single rudder, provided control in pitch and yaw. The curved wings were single surfaced and were mounted on the top rails of the structure, and were braced to kingposts.
Power was provided by a 3hp V-twin Garrard-Maxfield motor cycle engine which was later to be changed to a 40hp. The machine was exhibited at the Royal Hotel, Birmingham at an exhibition of models by the Midland Aero Club on 13 October 1909. A half scale development was also shown at Olympia on the Royal Aero Club stand in March 1910.
This was probably the first aeroplane to fly in the Midlands on 24 September 1909, confirmed again by witnesses on 30 September 1909, at Castle Bromwich Golf Links. The flights were at low height and of short duration.
The machine had a fuselage and undercarriage made of cycle tubing and was mounted on three cycle wheels, the front pair being steerable. A biplane front elevator and biplane tail with single rudder, provided control in pitch and yaw. The curved wings were single surfaced and were mounted on the top rails of the structure, and were braced to kingposts.
Power was provided by a 3hp V-twin Garrard-Maxfield motor cycle engine which was later to be changed to a 40hp. The machine was exhibited at the Royal Hotel, Birmingham at an exhibition of models by the Midland Aero Club on 13 October 1909. A half scale development was also shown at Olympia on the Royal Aero Club stand in March 1910.
Maxfield monoplane which was flown at Castle Bromwich in September 1909 on show at the Midland Aero Club Show in Birmingham.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MAXIM biplane (Mr. later Sir Hiram Maxim, Baldwyns Park, Bexley, Kent)
Maxim, who came to England from America in 1881, had become interested in the problem of flight by 1887. He carried out many experiments, including making a large whirling arm, tested a great variety of propellers and patented many of his ideas. These culminated in his design of a large biplane, powered by two steam engines and designed to run on rails, but prevented by upper rails from lifting to a good height. On 5 July 1895 it is reported that the machine lifted off the ground and was airborne for 600ft, until an axle broke and the machine burst through the upper rail and was badly damaged.
There had been earlier tests from 1893 onwards but this, the last trial, was carried out in the presence of members of the Aeronautical Society and others. Although Maxim began repairs and modifications, he was forced to abandon the machine and to close down his operation at Baldwyns Park, which, in any case, did not allow sufficient length for his purpose.
He had spent about ?17,000 on the machine and it was about fifteen years before he constructed another aircraft. The large hangar was removed and re-erected at Eynsford in Kent, where it was later used by Pilcher for his gliding experiments.
The machine, as tested, was a biplane built around a light welded steel tube structure, the base of which provided a platform on which was positioned the boiler with its fuel and water tanks, the controls and the crew. The lifting surfaces consisted of a large octagonal, double-surfaced, top center plane, to which parallel chord outer wings were attached. Projecting at this level, were balanced front and rear elevators. At the level of the platform a pair of single surfaced lower wings were braced by light struts and cables. The sides of the base were used to mount the four running wheels. The restraining wheels, on their separate axles, were attached to the tubular frame.
Since the whole of the project was experimental, the configuration of the machine changed during the trials and, at one stage, an additional wing was fitted above the center section. In the final version it was proposed to fit five pairs of outer wings.
The two wide chord propellers had two blades consisting of laminated pine with fabric covering, and were braced by wires to an extension of the driving shaft. The engines were mounted horizontally at midgap, behind a wing shaped fairing and drove the propellers direct. Naphtha was the fuel used to raise steam in the Thorneycroft Marine boiler.
The crew of up to four stood on the platform, with Maxim controlling the power at a station behind the boiler stand, with a crew member behind controlling the elevators. The other crew members were there to take readings or as passengers.
Power: Two 180hp Maxim two-cylinder compound steam engines driving 17ft 10in diameter propellers.
Data
Span 104ft
Gap 20ft
Area 3,875 sq ft (6,000 sq ft with 5 pairs of wings)
Length 120ft
Center section span 50ft
Center section length 47ft
Fuselage platform 40ft long by 8ft wide
Weight allup 8,000 lb (3 crew & 600 lb water)
Speed achieved 42mph
Maxim, who came to England from America in 1881, had become interested in the problem of flight by 1887. He carried out many experiments, including making a large whirling arm, tested a great variety of propellers and patented many of his ideas. These culminated in his design of a large biplane, powered by two steam engines and designed to run on rails, but prevented by upper rails from lifting to a good height. On 5 July 1895 it is reported that the machine lifted off the ground and was airborne for 600ft, until an axle broke and the machine burst through the upper rail and was badly damaged.
There had been earlier tests from 1893 onwards but this, the last trial, was carried out in the presence of members of the Aeronautical Society and others. Although Maxim began repairs and modifications, he was forced to abandon the machine and to close down his operation at Baldwyns Park, which, in any case, did not allow sufficient length for his purpose.
He had spent about ?17,000 on the machine and it was about fifteen years before he constructed another aircraft. The large hangar was removed and re-erected at Eynsford in Kent, where it was later used by Pilcher for his gliding experiments.
The machine, as tested, was a biplane built around a light welded steel tube structure, the base of which provided a platform on which was positioned the boiler with its fuel and water tanks, the controls and the crew. The lifting surfaces consisted of a large octagonal, double-surfaced, top center plane, to which parallel chord outer wings were attached. Projecting at this level, were balanced front and rear elevators. At the level of the platform a pair of single surfaced lower wings were braced by light struts and cables. The sides of the base were used to mount the four running wheels. The restraining wheels, on their separate axles, were attached to the tubular frame.
Since the whole of the project was experimental, the configuration of the machine changed during the trials and, at one stage, an additional wing was fitted above the center section. In the final version it was proposed to fit five pairs of outer wings.
The two wide chord propellers had two blades consisting of laminated pine with fabric covering, and were braced by wires to an extension of the driving shaft. The engines were mounted horizontally at midgap, behind a wing shaped fairing and drove the propellers direct. Naphtha was the fuel used to raise steam in the Thorneycroft Marine boiler.
The crew of up to four stood on the platform, with Maxim controlling the power at a station behind the boiler stand, with a crew member behind controlling the elevators. The other crew members were there to take readings or as passengers.
Power: Two 180hp Maxim two-cylinder compound steam engines driving 17ft 10in diameter propellers.
Data
Span 104ft
Gap 20ft
Area 3,875 sq ft (6,000 sq ft with 5 pairs of wings)
Length 120ft
Center section span 50ft
Center section length 47ft
Fuselage platform 40ft long by 8ft wide
Weight allup 8,000 lb (3 crew & 600 lb water)
Speed achieved 42mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MAXIM biplane 1910
In 1904 Sir Hiram began the drawings of a new aircraft, but did not complete the design immediately; in 1908 work was recommenced. The machine was built at the works of the Wolseley Tool and Motor Car Co., a subsidiary of Vickers, Sons and Maxim Ltd. at Crayford in Kent and was sufficiently advanced in construction to be photographed and described by Flight in April 1910, after Sir Hiram had himself described the principle features of the machine in an earlier article. Despite the passage of time, Maxim designed a scaled down version of his 1894 machine, but powered by an internal combustion engine of his own design.
The machine was a pusher biplane with front and rear biplane elevators and rear rudder. The two outer wing bays were arched and could be warped for lateral control, operated by a foot bar. The rudder was interconnected to steerable tail wheels operated by a hand wheel or handlebar on the control column, which worked in a fore and aft manner for moving the elevators.
The center structure of the aircraft was parallel in plan and consisted of two steel tubular top longerons, which were continued fore and aft with aluminum tubular booms to carry the elevator units. The lower longerons and bracing tubes were of aluminum. The main wheels were carried in wooden forks, trailing from the bottom longerons and were sprung by pneumatic struts at the rear; curved skids of ash extended forward to limit nosing over.
The lower center section of the wing provided the mounting for the engine, which drove one propeller direct and two others of larger size by rope drives, tensioned by jockey pulleys. The starboard propeller revolved in the opposite direction to the others and, to reduce any asymmetric tendencies, the pitch of the port propeller and its speed of rotation, were lower than for the starboard. The wide chord propellers were thin and made of laminated pine and were braced back to the drive shafts by steel tapes, themselves set with pitch to give thrust. The outer propellers rotated on bearings around the main top longerons.
The pilot sat in a short nacelle ahead of the lower wing and two passengers were accommodated in exposed positions on adjacent seats with footrests on the sides of the nacelle. The lower members of the nacelle were extended to provide a mounting for the fuel and oil tank and these terminated in a small lifting surface. The radiators were carried horizontally below the top center section of the wings.
Maxim was seventy years old and weighed seventeen stone and was being pressured by the other directors of Vickers, Sons and Maxim Ltd., so it was no surprise when he announced in October his intention to rest and not to do anything further with the machine for the present In the following March he resigned as a director and the company was then renamed Vickers Ltd. The machine never did fly after all the effort expended.
Power: 80hp Maxim four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving one 5ft diameter propeller direct and two 11ft 4in diameter propellers by rope drive.
Data
Span 44ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Length 35 ft 6in
Gap 6ft 6in
Area 572 sq ft
Area front elevator 81 sq ft
Area rear elevator 81 sq ft
Area rudder 16 1/2 sq ft
In 1904 Sir Hiram began the drawings of a new aircraft, but did not complete the design immediately; in 1908 work was recommenced. The machine was built at the works of the Wolseley Tool and Motor Car Co., a subsidiary of Vickers, Sons and Maxim Ltd. at Crayford in Kent and was sufficiently advanced in construction to be photographed and described by Flight in April 1910, after Sir Hiram had himself described the principle features of the machine in an earlier article. Despite the passage of time, Maxim designed a scaled down version of his 1894 machine, but powered by an internal combustion engine of his own design.
The machine was a pusher biplane with front and rear biplane elevators and rear rudder. The two outer wing bays were arched and could be warped for lateral control, operated by a foot bar. The rudder was interconnected to steerable tail wheels operated by a hand wheel or handlebar on the control column, which worked in a fore and aft manner for moving the elevators.
The center structure of the aircraft was parallel in plan and consisted of two steel tubular top longerons, which were continued fore and aft with aluminum tubular booms to carry the elevator units. The lower longerons and bracing tubes were of aluminum. The main wheels were carried in wooden forks, trailing from the bottom longerons and were sprung by pneumatic struts at the rear; curved skids of ash extended forward to limit nosing over.
The lower center section of the wing provided the mounting for the engine, which drove one propeller direct and two others of larger size by rope drives, tensioned by jockey pulleys. The starboard propeller revolved in the opposite direction to the others and, to reduce any asymmetric tendencies, the pitch of the port propeller and its speed of rotation, were lower than for the starboard. The wide chord propellers were thin and made of laminated pine and were braced back to the drive shafts by steel tapes, themselves set with pitch to give thrust. The outer propellers rotated on bearings around the main top longerons.
The pilot sat in a short nacelle ahead of the lower wing and two passengers were accommodated in exposed positions on adjacent seats with footrests on the sides of the nacelle. The lower members of the nacelle were extended to provide a mounting for the fuel and oil tank and these terminated in a small lifting surface. The radiators were carried horizontally below the top center section of the wings.
Maxim was seventy years old and weighed seventeen stone and was being pressured by the other directors of Vickers, Sons and Maxim Ltd., so it was no surprise when he announced in October his intention to rest and not to do anything further with the machine for the present In the following March he resigned as a director and the company was then renamed Vickers Ltd. The machine never did fly after all the effort expended.
Power: 80hp Maxim four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving one 5ft diameter propeller direct and two 11ft 4in diameter propellers by rope drive.
Data
Span 44ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Length 35 ft 6in
Gap 6ft 6in
Area 572 sq ft
Area front elevator 81 sq ft
Area rear elevator 81 sq ft
Area rudder 16 1/2 sq ft
Maxim biplane built at Crayford was an obsolete design when it appeared in 1910 and was abandoned without being tested.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
McARDLE & GOULD monoplane (W.E. McArdle and George Gould, Gladstone Rd., Bournemouth and Bagshot Moor, near Beaulieu)
W.E. McArdle and J. Armstrong Drexel were the proprietors and chief flying instructors of the New Forest Aviation School near Beaulieu, which flourished in 1910 and early 1911 and which, at its height, had at least seven Bleriot monoplanes in use; three of these were built by McArdle's garage and motor works at Bournemouth and fitted with Anzani engines.
McArdle and George Gould, who became chief engineer of the New Forest School, built a monoplane of Bleriot type at Bournemouth in August 1909. Nothing was subsequently heard of it. George Gould was McArdle's foreman carpenter for the aero-construction.
In May 1910 McArdle was reported to be building three biplanes at Bournemouth. The Flying School closed down in early 1912 and some or all of their aeroplanes were sold to Major F.B. Fowler of the Eastbourne Aviation Company's Flying School.
W.E. McArdle and J. Armstrong Drexel were the proprietors and chief flying instructors of the New Forest Aviation School near Beaulieu, which flourished in 1910 and early 1911 and which, at its height, had at least seven Bleriot monoplanes in use; three of these were built by McArdle's garage and motor works at Bournemouth and fitted with Anzani engines.
McArdle and George Gould, who became chief engineer of the New Forest School, built a monoplane of Bleriot type at Bournemouth in August 1909. Nothing was subsequently heard of it. George Gould was McArdle's foreman carpenter for the aero-construction.
In May 1910 McArdle was reported to be building three biplanes at Bournemouth. The Flying School closed down in early 1912 and some or all of their aeroplanes were sold to Major F.B. Fowler of the Eastbourne Aviation Company's Flying School.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MEGONE biplane (W.B. Megone, Hawkinge, Kent)
The Megone biplane was designed and built by a Dutchman with the assistance of Victor Hunt and others, between 1912 and 1914. The machine appeared in a second version after early unsuccessful trials.
The aircraft was a two-seater pusher biplane, housing the passenger behind the pilot on a lifting seat, giving a good view through celluloid panels in the lower wing for observation purposes. The inverted triangular section tail boom required that the propeller revolve around its top member. The engine was mounted low down in the front of the nacelle with a Hele-Shaw clutch, rear extension shaft and chain drive to the propeller. This arrangement necessitated taking the control cables through the center of the propeller boss, and inside the top tube, to the tail. The tail surfaces consisted of normal tailplane and elevator with a large shield shaped rudder above and a small surface attached to the tail-skid below.
It was reported that various engines were used, including 35 and 60hp Green types, the radiators for cooling being hung on the sides of the nacelle.
The early version of the machine had a short span lower wing with pronounced anhedral apparently without external bracing. The upper wing was braced independently to an inverted vee-shaped pylon above the center section, and by cables to the bottom of the nacelle. After the failure of this version, the lower wing was increased in span and two pairs of interplane struts were introduced; the center pylon was then discarded. The top wing, originally of parallel chord, which embodied the warp, was extended rearwards towards the tips, providing a larger overhanging warping section. The top supports for the warp cables were tilted backwards to match.
The main wheels were mounted on a continuation of the lower longerons, which were curved upwards and originally fitted with small bumper wheels. Small wheels were fitted to the lower wing tips when they were extended.
The machine, in its first version, was ready for testing early in 1913 by Victor Hunt, who acted as test pilot for Megone, but damage resulted. Repairs and experiments continued into 1914, and the machine was still in existence in September of that year. Without warning, Megone suddenly disappeared leaving the machine locked in its shed and creating rumors that he was a spy for Germany.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled. A 35hp Green and other types may also have been tried. A 10ft diameter propeller was fitted.
Data
Wing area 440 sq ft
Tailplane area 54 sq ft
The Megone biplane was designed and built by a Dutchman with the assistance of Victor Hunt and others, between 1912 and 1914. The machine appeared in a second version after early unsuccessful trials.
The aircraft was a two-seater pusher biplane, housing the passenger behind the pilot on a lifting seat, giving a good view through celluloid panels in the lower wing for observation purposes. The inverted triangular section tail boom required that the propeller revolve around its top member. The engine was mounted low down in the front of the nacelle with a Hele-Shaw clutch, rear extension shaft and chain drive to the propeller. This arrangement necessitated taking the control cables through the center of the propeller boss, and inside the top tube, to the tail. The tail surfaces consisted of normal tailplane and elevator with a large shield shaped rudder above and a small surface attached to the tail-skid below.
It was reported that various engines were used, including 35 and 60hp Green types, the radiators for cooling being hung on the sides of the nacelle.
The early version of the machine had a short span lower wing with pronounced anhedral apparently without external bracing. The upper wing was braced independently to an inverted vee-shaped pylon above the center section, and by cables to the bottom of the nacelle. After the failure of this version, the lower wing was increased in span and two pairs of interplane struts were introduced; the center pylon was then discarded. The top wing, originally of parallel chord, which embodied the warp, was extended rearwards towards the tips, providing a larger overhanging warping section. The top supports for the warp cables were tilted backwards to match.
The main wheels were mounted on a continuation of the lower longerons, which were curved upwards and originally fitted with small bumper wheels. Small wheels were fitted to the lower wing tips when they were extended.
The machine, in its first version, was ready for testing early in 1913 by Victor Hunt, who acted as test pilot for Megone, but damage resulted. Repairs and experiments continued into 1914, and the machine was still in existence in September of that year. Without warning, Megone suddenly disappeared leaving the machine locked in its shed and creating rumors that he was a spy for Germany.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled. A 35hp Green and other types may also have been tried. A 10ft diameter propeller was fitted.
Data
Wing area 440 sq ft
Tailplane area 54 sq ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MERSEY monoplane (Mersey Aeroplane Co., Freshfield, Liverpool, Lancashire)
R.C. Fenwick and ST. Swaby began the design and construction of this machine when managers of Planes Ltd., and completed the aircraft at their premises. The aircraft flew for the first time late in 1911 with Fenwick, the designer, as pilot. The partners took over the development of the machine to prepare for entry in the Military Trials of August 1912, in the course of which it crashed, killing Fenwick.
The machine was a side-by-side two-seater with a nacelle between the wings, which were attached at the top longerons. The engine in the front drove a pusher propeller at half speed though an extension shaft, passing between the two seats. Steel tubing was used for the booms, wing spars and undercarriage structure. The wings were braced by wires to tall king posts and to the undercarriage, including to the wheel centers. The tail unit was carried on the pair of horizontal tubes, which, with single wire bracing, appeared quite inadequate.
The tail surfaces consisted of a single tailplane and elevator with balanced rudder above and a small fixed fin below, although originally a smaller rudder and no fin were fitted.
Power: 45hp Isaacson seven-cylinder radial air-cooled driving a pusher propeller by a 2 to 1 reduction gearing and shaft.
Data
Span 35ft
Chord 7ft
Area 220 sq ft
Weight 750 lb
Weight allup 1,150lb
Speed 55mph
R.C. Fenwick and ST. Swaby began the design and construction of this machine when managers of Planes Ltd., and completed the aircraft at their premises. The aircraft flew for the first time late in 1911 with Fenwick, the designer, as pilot. The partners took over the development of the machine to prepare for entry in the Military Trials of August 1912, in the course of which it crashed, killing Fenwick.
The machine was a side-by-side two-seater with a nacelle between the wings, which were attached at the top longerons. The engine in the front drove a pusher propeller at half speed though an extension shaft, passing between the two seats. Steel tubing was used for the booms, wing spars and undercarriage structure. The wings were braced by wires to tall king posts and to the undercarriage, including to the wheel centers. The tail unit was carried on the pair of horizontal tubes, which, with single wire bracing, appeared quite inadequate.
The tail surfaces consisted of a single tailplane and elevator with balanced rudder above and a small fixed fin below, although originally a smaller rudder and no fin were fitted.
Power: 45hp Isaacson seven-cylinder radial air-cooled driving a pusher propeller by a 2 to 1 reduction gearing and shaft.
Data
Span 35ft
Chord 7ft
Area 220 sq ft
Weight 750 lb
Weight allup 1,150lb
Speed 55mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
METZGAR & LENO monoplane (Bert and Ted Metzgar and Herbert Dan Leno, Old Town, Clapham, London, S W)
The construction of this machine, which was the design of Bert Metzgar, was started in 1907, but it was not until the summer of 1911 that trials at Shoreham took place. These resulted in short hops of no more than 50ft up to a height of 3ft or so, before the financial strain was too much.
The aircraft was a pusher monoplane, much like an ASL Valkyrie in layout, and used tube in its construction. There were twin booms and these earned the four wheels on twin axles, and these curved upwards to provide the mounting for the front elevator. The rear booms carried a rudder and tailplane, and lateral control was by single acting, broad chord ailerons.
The pilot was originally seated behind and below the engine, which drove, at reduced speed, the propeller by chain and shaft, above the pilot. Later the propeller was driven direct by the crankshaft and the engine moved back and the pilot forward. The engine was a four-cylinder water-cooled type, reported by The Aero as having been made by the partners, although elsewhere it was referred to as a 60hp Brasier. It had cast aluminum water jackets with cast iron liners and cylinder heads and may have been a modification of a car engine. The radiator was finally mounted horizontally above the aircraft together with the fuel tank.
Data
Span 36ft
The construction of this machine, which was the design of Bert Metzgar, was started in 1907, but it was not until the summer of 1911 that trials at Shoreham took place. These resulted in short hops of no more than 50ft up to a height of 3ft or so, before the financial strain was too much.
The aircraft was a pusher monoplane, much like an ASL Valkyrie in layout, and used tube in its construction. There were twin booms and these earned the four wheels on twin axles, and these curved upwards to provide the mounting for the front elevator. The rear booms carried a rudder and tailplane, and lateral control was by single acting, broad chord ailerons.
The pilot was originally seated behind and below the engine, which drove, at reduced speed, the propeller by chain and shaft, above the pilot. Later the propeller was driven direct by the crankshaft and the engine moved back and the pilot forward. The engine was a four-cylinder water-cooled type, reported by The Aero as having been made by the partners, although elsewhere it was referred to as a 60hp Brasier. It had cast aluminum water jackets with cast iron liners and cylinder heads and may have been a modification of a car engine. The radiator was finally mounted horizontally above the aircraft together with the fuel tank.
Data
Span 36ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MILLER ornithopters (W. Miller MRCS, Hart St., Covent Garden, London)
Towards the end of the 18th century Miller devised a primitive ornithopter with two pairs of winglets operated by ropes. The winglets were hinged to plates worn on the chest and back of the flyer. The ropes were pushed down by alternate movement of his legs and imparted the necessary flapping motion. As with most ornithopters the optimism of the inventor was not matched by the performance of the apparatus.
Millers second ornithopter, the, Aerostat, appeared in about 1840 and was described as based on the form of a West Indian crow, the wings were operated manually by levers. It had a fixed wing center section and a moveable tailplane aft of the pilot. Weight 500 lb.
Towards the end of the 18th century Miller devised a primitive ornithopter with two pairs of winglets operated by ropes. The winglets were hinged to plates worn on the chest and back of the flyer. The ropes were pushed down by alternate movement of his legs and imparted the necessary flapping motion. As with most ornithopters the optimism of the inventor was not matched by the performance of the apparatus.
Millers second ornithopter, the, Aerostat, appeared in about 1840 and was described as based on the form of a West Indian crow, the wings were operated manually by levers. It had a fixed wing center section and a moveable tailplane aft of the pilot. Weight 500 lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MILLER helicopter (J. Miller, 62 Abbott Rd., Putney, London, SW)
This device, built in 1909, consisted of twin screws of spiral design spinning in opposite directions on a vertical shaft, driven by a 50hp motor. A narrow vertical surface extended for the full height outside of the rotating screws to provide directional control.
Data
Two coaxial rotor screws 10ft diameter
Area 909 sq ft
Weight 1,1901b
This device, built in 1909, consisted of twin screws of spiral design spinning in opposite directions on a vertical shaft, driven by a 50hp motor. A narrow vertical surface extended for the full height outside of the rotating screws to provide directional control.
Data
Two coaxial rotor screws 10ft diameter
Area 909 sq ft
Weight 1,1901b
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MINES biplane (Edward Mines, Brightholme, W. Kirby, Cheshire)
This impractical machine appeared at the Doncaster Meeting of October 1909 but did not fly. It was variously nicknamed 'the meat safe' or 'the coffee stall'. It was for sale in February 1910.
The machine was a pusher biplane with bicycle front wheel and handlebars. There was no tail, but a large elevator flap was hinged on the front of the top wing; rudders were fitted to each outboard front interplane strut, and the lower wingtips could be pivoted for lateral control. The power was supplied by a 10hp JAP or Anzani vee-twin, air-cooled engine driving the propeller by chain and shaft. Mines is reported to have attempted to fly a glider at Llandudno in 1908.
In March 1910 Mines registered a company Edward Mines Aviation Syndicate Ltd. to raise funds to purchase a Farman type all-British aeroplane from the Aerial Manufacturing Company of Great Britain and Ireland. Nothing further is known of this venture.
Data
Span 14ft
Chord 6ft
This impractical machine appeared at the Doncaster Meeting of October 1909 but did not fly. It was variously nicknamed 'the meat safe' or 'the coffee stall'. It was for sale in February 1910.
The machine was a pusher biplane with bicycle front wheel and handlebars. There was no tail, but a large elevator flap was hinged on the front of the top wing; rudders were fitted to each outboard front interplane strut, and the lower wingtips could be pivoted for lateral control. The power was supplied by a 10hp JAP or Anzani vee-twin, air-cooled engine driving the propeller by chain and shaft. Mines is reported to have attempted to fly a glider at Llandudno in 1908.
In March 1910 Mines registered a company Edward Mines Aviation Syndicate Ltd. to raise funds to purchase a Farman type all-British aeroplane from the Aerial Manufacturing Company of Great Britain and Ireland. Nothing further is known of this venture.
Data
Span 14ft
Chord 6ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MITCHELL hydro-biplane (Three Mitchell Bros., 32 Greenfield Rd., Gillingham, Kent)
The Mitchell brothers seaplane was tested on the Medway in the middle of 1914, but could only be taxied in an area where flying was restricted. On the last of these runs the machine nosed over in the water at Bennett's Wharf.
The aircraft was a typical tractor biplane, mounted on two main floats and a tail float. Ailerons were fitted on the interplane struts. Assembly took place behind the White Horse Inn in Pier Road, Gillingham. The war prevented any further activity.
The brothers are believed to have built a 25hp monoplane in 1912.
Power: 100hp Mors, probably a car engine.
Data
Span top 37ft
Span bottom 34ft
Chord 4ft 6in
Gap 6ft
Weight 1,050 lb
The Mitchell brothers seaplane was tested on the Medway in the middle of 1914, but could only be taxied in an area where flying was restricted. On the last of these runs the machine nosed over in the water at Bennett's Wharf.
The aircraft was a typical tractor biplane, mounted on two main floats and a tail float. Ailerons were fitted on the interplane struts. Assembly took place behind the White Horse Inn in Pier Road, Gillingham. The war prevented any further activity.
The brothers are believed to have built a 25hp monoplane in 1912.
Power: 100hp Mors, probably a car engine.
Data
Span top 37ft
Span bottom 34ft
Chord 4ft 6in
Gap 6ft
Weight 1,050 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MOLESWORTH-HUGHES triplane (H.B. Molesworth, Brooklands)
The Mackensie-Hughes triplane, Brittannia, was apparently taken over by Molesworth and redesigned in the autumn of 1910. In September it was reported as still unable to fly on 20hp after changes of propeller, both geared and direct drive being tried. In November a report suggested that a 20hp British Rotary engine was to be fitted, with a larger one of 50hp later. This engine did not materialize. On the 10 February 1911 the triplane was rolling, but although improved, it would still not lift off. The same applied on 1 March 1911, but then the undercarriage collapsed and the machine stood on its nose, when the machine was on the verge of flight. Nothing more was reported.
The modification from the Mackensie-Hughes triplane was primarily to replace the original engine driving twin propellers, with a more powerful 60hp ENV eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee, driving a single propeller direct. At the same time the complicated triplane tailplane was discarded and replaced with a single tailplane on the top longerons, with the rudder mounted behind.
The Mackensie-Hughes triplane, Brittannia, was apparently taken over by Molesworth and redesigned in the autumn of 1910. In September it was reported as still unable to fly on 20hp after changes of propeller, both geared and direct drive being tried. In November a report suggested that a 20hp British Rotary engine was to be fitted, with a larger one of 50hp later. This engine did not materialize. On the 10 February 1911 the triplane was rolling, but although improved, it would still not lift off. The same applied on 1 March 1911, but then the undercarriage collapsed and the machine stood on its nose, when the machine was on the verge of flight. Nothing more was reported.
The modification from the Mackensie-Hughes triplane was primarily to replace the original engine driving twin propellers, with a more powerful 60hp ENV eight-cylinder, water-cooled vee, driving a single propeller direct. At the same time the complicated triplane tailplane was discarded and replaced with a single tailplane on the top longerons, with the rudder mounted behind.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MOON Moonbeam monoplane Nos.l and 2 (Moonbeams Ltd., Royal Pier Gates, Town Quay, Southampton)
Eric Rowland Moon managed the family marine business and, in 1909, began the construction of his first aircraft. This was of Demoiselle type, with a light steel tubular frame and tapered wings with warping control. The machine had been undergoing trials for some weeks and had flown by early June 1910, when Moon wrote to Flight. It is believed that the trials took place from fields near Fawley.
The second version may have used the same fuselage structure, but had a more substantial undercarriage with twin skids. A rigid wing with single-acting ailerons was used and the tail surfaces were changed to ones with straight edges.
The second machine flew more successfully than the first, from fields at Beaulieu, Ower and North Stonham, Eastleigh. Moon became a pilot in the RNAS after the outbreak of war.
Power: 20hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 24ft
Weight 260 lb
Eric Rowland Moon managed the family marine business and, in 1909, began the construction of his first aircraft. This was of Demoiselle type, with a light steel tubular frame and tapered wings with warping control. The machine had been undergoing trials for some weeks and had flown by early June 1910, when Moon wrote to Flight. It is believed that the trials took place from fields near Fawley.
The second version may have used the same fuselage structure, but had a more substantial undercarriage with twin skids. A rigid wing with single-acting ailerons was used and the tail surfaces were changed to ones with straight edges.
The second machine flew more successfully than the first, from fields at Beaulieu, Ower and North Stonham, Eastleigh. Moon became a pilot in the RNAS after the outbreak of war.
Power: 20hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 24ft
Weight 260 lb
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MOORE-BRABAZON biplane powered glider (J.T.C. Moore-Brabazon)
Moore-Brabazon's original intention was to make a biplane glider of 25ft span with cambered wings. However, in consultation with Short Bros, at Battersea, who made the machine for ?25, the final version became a structure of ash and bamboo of 35ft span, with almost flat wings. This was the first heavier than air machine made by the Shorts, who had previously made only balloons.
The glider had a front elevator at the level of the lower wing. The undercarriage had skids and four wheels and could be dropped. The machine was built in late-1907, and taken to Brooklands, where it was housed adjacent to the first aircraft of A.V. Roe, in the motor racing paddock area. After a few unsatisfactory tests as a glider, Moore-Brabazon arranged for Howard Wright to reconstruct it as a powered aircraft.
Apart from installing a 16-18hp Buchet four-cylinder inline air-cooled engine driving a four-bladed aluminum pusher propeller, the undercarriage was made a fixed arrangement of four castering wheels. A fixed tailplane on booms was added, together with square shaped flaps, hinged vertically to the central interplane struts as balance controls.
In this form the undercarriage proved to be weak during runs along the Finishing Straight, so the machine was converted back to a glider with all control surfaces removed and a strengthened undercarriage fitted. It was taken to Chelmsford in Essex, where it was flown briefly as a kite. Moore-Brabazon then went to France, where he acquired a Voisin aircraft.
Moore-Brabazon's original intention was to make a biplane glider of 25ft span with cambered wings. However, in consultation with Short Bros, at Battersea, who made the machine for ?25, the final version became a structure of ash and bamboo of 35ft span, with almost flat wings. This was the first heavier than air machine made by the Shorts, who had previously made only balloons.
The glider had a front elevator at the level of the lower wing. The undercarriage had skids and four wheels and could be dropped. The machine was built in late-1907, and taken to Brooklands, where it was housed adjacent to the first aircraft of A.V. Roe, in the motor racing paddock area. After a few unsatisfactory tests as a glider, Moore-Brabazon arranged for Howard Wright to reconstruct it as a powered aircraft.
Apart from installing a 16-18hp Buchet four-cylinder inline air-cooled engine driving a four-bladed aluminum pusher propeller, the undercarriage was made a fixed arrangement of four castering wheels. A fixed tailplane on booms was added, together with square shaped flaps, hinged vertically to the central interplane struts as balance controls.
In this form the undercarriage proved to be weak during runs along the Finishing Straight, so the machine was converted back to a glider with all control surfaces removed and a strengthened undercarriage fitted. It was taken to Chelmsford in Essex, where it was flown briefly as a kite. Moore-Brabazon then went to France, where he acquired a Voisin aircraft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MORTIMER & VAUGHAN biplane (Mortimer & Vaughan, Edgware, Middlesex)
A photograph of a model of this machine, which was being built at the time, appeared in Flight 4 December 1909 (p.784). It was a three propeller machine, with semicircular wings, and named a 'Safety' biplane, but it crashed and burned on test in 1910. A second modified version is said to have been made in 1911. No reports of this can be traced.
A photograph of a model of this machine, which was being built at the time, appeared in Flight 4 December 1909 (p.784). It was a three propeller machine, with semicircular wings, and named a 'Safety' biplane, but it crashed and burned on test in 1910. A second modified version is said to have been made in 1911. No reports of this can be traced.
Mortimer and Vaughan biplane. The fullsize version of this model was built but burned on test in 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MOY Aerial Steamer (Thomas Moy, Crystal Palace)
This tandem wing monoplane was the tangible result of inventions by Moy, and initially with Richard Edmund Still, patented in 1871 (No.3238) and 1874 (No.2808). The machine was powered by a 3hp steam engine and, although intended to carry a man, lifted itself only, when tried at the Crystal Palace in 1875. The tests were carried out on a circular track and a speed of 33mph was reached.
The machine was constructed of light tubing with a semicircular front plane, behind which a pair of 12ft diameter propellers, of unusual design, revolved. These took the form of circular wheels, made of tubing, with six spokes on which eight 'aeroplanes' of reducing length were mounted; the attitude of these was adjustable to provide lift as well as thrust.
A biplane tail was used as an elevator. The patent also refers to pendulum control as well as manual control.
Moy was still involved in aeronautics at a much later date. Photographs of a model ornithopter on test, dated 1901, exist; however none of his ideas resulted in practical aircraft.
This tandem wing monoplane was the tangible result of inventions by Moy, and initially with Richard Edmund Still, patented in 1871 (No.3238) and 1874 (No.2808). The machine was powered by a 3hp steam engine and, although intended to carry a man, lifted itself only, when tried at the Crystal Palace in 1875. The tests were carried out on a circular track and a speed of 33mph was reached.
The machine was constructed of light tubing with a semicircular front plane, behind which a pair of 12ft diameter propellers, of unusual design, revolved. These took the form of circular wheels, made of tubing, with six spokes on which eight 'aeroplanes' of reducing length were mounted; the attitude of these was adjustable to provide lift as well as thrust.
A biplane tail was used as an elevator. The patent also refers to pendulum control as well as manual control.
Moy was still involved in aeronautics at a much later date. Photographs of a model ornithopter on test, dated 1901, exist; however none of his ideas resulted in practical aircraft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MOYA Balloonoplane No.3
Nothing is known of Nos. 1 and 2, but No.3, a combination of a balloon, on end, above a small monoplane was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910. No contemporary reports of trials have been found, but the device would appear to be uncontrollable. Patent 30604/1909 refers.
Nothing is known of Nos. 1 and 2, but No.3, a combination of a balloon, on end, above a small monoplane was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910. No contemporary reports of trials have been found, but the device would appear to be uncontrollable. Patent 30604/1909 refers.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MULLINER COACHWORKS Ltd. (1325 Long Acre, London WC; 7385 Bridge St., Northampton & Vardens Rd., Battersea)
The firm of Mulliners decided to enter the aircraft industry and to this end acquired a former roller skating rink in Battersea in December 1910, but reversed their decision at the end of 1911. The firm continued in being as coach builders for many years after.
In the time that they operated at Vardens Rd., and at their previous premises, the firm could claim the design of two original aircraft. In addition they manufactured aircraft to other people's designs, including building, or repairing, Bleriot, Farman and other standard types. The Skinner monoplane was an example of a 'one off' machine, built for a customer; a biplane glider was reported as being made in November 1911 for an Irishman named Newton-Gordon.
MULLINER monoplane Model B
This was designed by Gordon Stewart and was exhibited at Olympia in March 1910. Although the machine was praised for the attention to detail in the design and quality of its construction, it failed to attract attention and soon disappeared from the scene.
The fuselage longerons were of H-section and lightened further by holes in the webs. The undercarriage was of light tubing with the wheels separately mounted in forks, which were sprung in a knee action manner. An unusual triple arm tail skid was fitted. The tail unit comprised a tailplane with single elevator and rudder above the fixed surface. Wing warping was controlled by a wheel on the control column.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 3in diameter Spencer propeller
Data
Span 33ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Length 27ft
Area tailplane 13 sq ft
Area 220 sq ft
Area elevator 14 sq ft
Area rudder 4 sq ft
Weight 420 lb
Weight allup 605 lb
Max speed 40 mph
Price ?450-500
The firm of Mulliners decided to enter the aircraft industry and to this end acquired a former roller skating rink in Battersea in December 1910, but reversed their decision at the end of 1911. The firm continued in being as coach builders for many years after.
In the time that they operated at Vardens Rd., and at their previous premises, the firm could claim the design of two original aircraft. In addition they manufactured aircraft to other people's designs, including building, or repairing, Bleriot, Farman and other standard types. The Skinner monoplane was an example of a 'one off' machine, built for a customer; a biplane glider was reported as being made in November 1911 for an Irishman named Newton-Gordon.
MULLINER monoplane Model B
This was designed by Gordon Stewart and was exhibited at Olympia in March 1910. Although the machine was praised for the attention to detail in the design and quality of its construction, it failed to attract attention and soon disappeared from the scene.
The fuselage longerons were of H-section and lightened further by holes in the webs. The undercarriage was of light tubing with the wheels separately mounted in forks, which were sprung in a knee action manner. An unusual triple arm tail skid was fitted. The tail unit comprised a tailplane with single elevator and rudder above the fixed surface. Wing warping was controlled by a wheel on the control column.
Power: 35hp JAP eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 3in diameter Spencer propeller
Data
Span 33ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Length 27ft
Area tailplane 13 sq ft
Area 220 sq ft
Area elevator 14 sq ft
Area rudder 4 sq ft
Weight 420 lb
Weight allup 605 lb
Max speed 40 mph
Price ?450-500
Mulliner monoplane Model B. One of the few machines bearing the firm's name was shown at Olympia in March 1910. Lightness is the keynote of the well-finished Mulliner monoplane designed by Gordon Stewarts
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MULLINER Knyplane monoplane
E. Cecil Kny was the manager at Vardens Rd. and he designed the second Mulliner aircraft. Kny was of Danish extraction and also acquired the agency for Normale propellers. This two-seater tractor monoplane had a boat shaped fuselage, covered with aluminum to behind the rear cockpit, with the rest fabric covered. A searchlight was fitted in front of the observer, when the machine was exhibited at Olympia in March 1911.
Unconventional features were the ability to control the incidence of the wings, which rotated about a tubular spar and also the ability to adjust the camber by separate controls. A fixed tailplane extended well along the fuselage; a cruciform elevator and rudder were used.
The undercarriage was of lever suspension type, with torsion springs and with a central sprung skid; a long tail skid was fitted.
The engine was buried inside the fuselage and was cooled by long external radiators extending well down the fuselage sides.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a Normale propeller through a clutch.
Data
Span 39ft
Length 36ft
Area 300 sq ft
Weight allup 1,250 1b
E. Cecil Kny was the manager at Vardens Rd. and he designed the second Mulliner aircraft. Kny was of Danish extraction and also acquired the agency for Normale propellers. This two-seater tractor monoplane had a boat shaped fuselage, covered with aluminum to behind the rear cockpit, with the rest fabric covered. A searchlight was fitted in front of the observer, when the machine was exhibited at Olympia in March 1911.
Unconventional features were the ability to control the incidence of the wings, which rotated about a tubular spar and also the ability to adjust the camber by separate controls. A fixed tailplane extended well along the fuselage; a cruciform elevator and rudder were used.
The undercarriage was of lever suspension type, with torsion springs and with a central sprung skid; a long tail skid was fitted.
The engine was buried inside the fuselage and was cooled by long external radiators extending well down the fuselage sides.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a Normale propeller through a clutch.
Data
Span 39ft
Length 36ft
Area 300 sq ft
Weight allup 1,250 1b
Mulliner Knyplane designed by the firm's Danish manager was at Olympia in 1911. It was not seen subsequently.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MUMFORD helicopter SO.60,1st and 2nd versions. (Edwin R. Mumford and J. Pollock Brown, Denny Bros., Leven Shipyard, Dumbarton, Strathclyde)
The partners were two senior men running the test tank at the shipyard, and the project was sponsored by Mr. Maurice Denny in 1905. A great deal of experimental work was carried out, and the first machine was virtually complete in 1906, but by 1909 was still in difficulties with the unsatisfactory Buchet engine, which was not achieving its claimed 25hp. This was replaced that year with a four-cylinder inline NEC, which also proved to be inadequate.
A second NEC, this time the new four-cylinder vee was fitted and first tests took place during September 1911. Thereafter this engine was used in both of the machines that were built.
The two versions were of the same basic layout, but varied mainly in improved detail construction, better materials and general points arising from the tests.
The frame was of rectangular planform, initially made of 1 1/2in o/d and 2in o/d by 22 swg aluminum tube, joined by steel castings and braced by wires. Two long wooden skids were fitted below the outside longitudinal members. The pilot sat behind the engine in the center of the craft with an elevator above him and a rudder at the rear of the frame.
Six 25ft diameter rotors, with two blades each, positioned at the four extremities and at either side at the center, were mounted on shafts tilted forward at ten degrees from the vertical, thus providing forward thrust. In October 1906 the blades were formed of bamboo rims with silk covering, but these suffered from water soakage causing reduction in strength and increase in weight. Steel rims were tried, but elm rims proved to be the most satisfactory and these survived from 1909 to the completion of the trials. In all positions the blades were braced back to their center shafts. The rotors were designed to revolve at 40 rpm.
A gearbox coupled through a clutch to the engine had two output shafts carrying sprockets, running at 3:1 reduction, and drove by chain two lengthwise side drive shafts, from which bevel gearing translated the drive to the rotor shafts. The radiator was made in four sections, which were mounted high up in the frame behind the pilot.
In 1912 the helicopter had made a number of tethered flights to about 10ft height, which culminated in one on 6 January 1913 when damage occurred, due to failure of a side drive shaft. The strain was telling on the aluminum tubes, and it was evident that a major reconstruction was necessary. A new machine was started in 1913 with a structure made of composite material of paper, wood and cloth, a foretaste of bonded materials of many years ahead.
Late in 1914 the new machine was fitted with floats, in which form it taxied out onto the water and flew 100 yards at 10ft height. The machine was towed back to the slipway, where it was destroyed that night by a gale, which ended this promising experiment.
Power:
25hp Buchet eight-cylinder air-cooled vee. The specified weight of 110 lb was exceeded and the power was not achieved.
25hp NEC four-cylinder inline two liter water-cooled two-stroke, weight 187 lb
40hp NEC four-cylinder 2.4 liter water-cooled two-stroke vee, weight 159 1/2 lb
A speed of 1,100 rpm was required to drive the mechanism and at this speed the first NEC gave less than 23 bhp; the second gave 37 bhp at 1,100 rpm.
Data
Max length 60ft
Max width 41ft
Weight first version originally 886 lb increased to 1,577 lb prepared for flight.
Weight second version 1,508 lb prepared for flight.
The partners were two senior men running the test tank at the shipyard, and the project was sponsored by Mr. Maurice Denny in 1905. A great deal of experimental work was carried out, and the first machine was virtually complete in 1906, but by 1909 was still in difficulties with the unsatisfactory Buchet engine, which was not achieving its claimed 25hp. This was replaced that year with a four-cylinder inline NEC, which also proved to be inadequate.
A second NEC, this time the new four-cylinder vee was fitted and first tests took place during September 1911. Thereafter this engine was used in both of the machines that were built.
The two versions were of the same basic layout, but varied mainly in improved detail construction, better materials and general points arising from the tests.
The frame was of rectangular planform, initially made of 1 1/2in o/d and 2in o/d by 22 swg aluminum tube, joined by steel castings and braced by wires. Two long wooden skids were fitted below the outside longitudinal members. The pilot sat behind the engine in the center of the craft with an elevator above him and a rudder at the rear of the frame.
Six 25ft diameter rotors, with two blades each, positioned at the four extremities and at either side at the center, were mounted on shafts tilted forward at ten degrees from the vertical, thus providing forward thrust. In October 1906 the blades were formed of bamboo rims with silk covering, but these suffered from water soakage causing reduction in strength and increase in weight. Steel rims were tried, but elm rims proved to be the most satisfactory and these survived from 1909 to the completion of the trials. In all positions the blades were braced back to their center shafts. The rotors were designed to revolve at 40 rpm.
A gearbox coupled through a clutch to the engine had two output shafts carrying sprockets, running at 3:1 reduction, and drove by chain two lengthwise side drive shafts, from which bevel gearing translated the drive to the rotor shafts. The radiator was made in four sections, which were mounted high up in the frame behind the pilot.
In 1912 the helicopter had made a number of tethered flights to about 10ft height, which culminated in one on 6 January 1913 when damage occurred, due to failure of a side drive shaft. The strain was telling on the aluminum tubes, and it was evident that a major reconstruction was necessary. A new machine was started in 1913 with a structure made of composite material of paper, wood and cloth, a foretaste of bonded materials of many years ahead.
Late in 1914 the new machine was fitted with floats, in which form it taxied out onto the water and flew 100 yards at 10ft height. The machine was towed back to the slipway, where it was destroyed that night by a gale, which ended this promising experiment.
Power:
25hp Buchet eight-cylinder air-cooled vee. The specified weight of 110 lb was exceeded and the power was not achieved.
25hp NEC four-cylinder inline two liter water-cooled two-stroke, weight 187 lb
40hp NEC four-cylinder 2.4 liter water-cooled two-stroke vee, weight 159 1/2 lb
A speed of 1,100 rpm was required to drive the mechanism and at this speed the first NEC gave less than 23 bhp; the second gave 37 bhp at 1,100 rpm.
Data
Max length 60ft
Max width 41ft
Weight first version originally 886 lb increased to 1,577 lb prepared for flight.
Weight second version 1,508 lb prepared for flight.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
MUSGRAVE biplane (Major Musgrave, East Grinstead, Sussex)
This machine was under construction in 1911, but still only partly built when Musgrave died before war was declared in 1914. A.M. Low was originally involved with the design and later AW. Judge. The machine was mainly made of bamboo, a material already obsolete.
This machine was under construction in 1911, but still only partly built when Musgrave died before war was declared in 1914. A.M. Low was originally involved with the design and later AW. Judge. The machine was mainly made of bamboo, a material already obsolete.
Musgrave biplane was under construction from 1911-1914 by which time it was obsolete and Major Musgrave had died.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NORTHERN AIRCRAFT Co. Ltd. (Cockshot, Bownesson-Windermere, Cumberland)
This company was formed in February 1914, with W.R. Ding as pilot and general manager, to operate commercial flights, initially using the Handley Page Type G biplane. Ding also applied to the Lakes Co. for the post of pilot, starting there in September 1914. By November he had arranged for the Northern Aircraft Co. to take over the whole of the Lakes company's activities.
As the successors to the Lakes Co., NAC inherited the monoplane that was nearing completion (q.v.), which then became known as the NAC monoplane. The first new aircraft initiated after the change was a pusher biplane, which did not materialize until early in 1915.
Although Ding has been credited with the design, the aircraft was mainly the work of C. Fleming Williams.
NAC pusher biplane seaplanes PB.l and PB.2
The machine that appeared after the outbreak of war was a two bay biplane with strut braced top wing extensions, and ailerons in the top wing only. The twin tail booms tapered in plan to a vertical rudder post, and joined the wings at the junctions of the rear spars and inboard interplane struts. A triangular fin was inset in the booms, and a rudder, with curved outline, was fitted. The rectangular tailplane, with tapered tips, was mounted on the top longerons and carried a divided elevator.
The nacelle was long and shallow and basically square in section. It carried a nose mounted radiator and had a raised decking to protect the pilot and passenger, aft of which the top was open. The Green engine was mounted aft with the cylinders protruding above the top of the nacelle, with fuel provided by a gravity tank under the top wing. The machine was mounted on a complex chassis of struts and cross members on twin floats.
The PB.l was converted to the PB.2 by the change to an air-cooled rotary. This enabled the nose radiator to be dispensed with, with a consequent improvement to the shape of the nacelle and rearrangement of the rear portion for the new engine installation.
The first test flight was carried by J. Lankester Parker, who later was for many years the chief test pilot for Short Bros. Ding also flew the machine but little is known of its use in the early war years.
Power:
PB.l 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled
PB.2 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
This company was formed in February 1914, with W.R. Ding as pilot and general manager, to operate commercial flights, initially using the Handley Page Type G biplane. Ding also applied to the Lakes Co. for the post of pilot, starting there in September 1914. By November he had arranged for the Northern Aircraft Co. to take over the whole of the Lakes company's activities.
As the successors to the Lakes Co., NAC inherited the monoplane that was nearing completion (q.v.), which then became known as the NAC monoplane. The first new aircraft initiated after the change was a pusher biplane, which did not materialize until early in 1915.
Although Ding has been credited with the design, the aircraft was mainly the work of C. Fleming Williams.
NAC pusher biplane seaplanes PB.l and PB.2
The machine that appeared after the outbreak of war was a two bay biplane with strut braced top wing extensions, and ailerons in the top wing only. The twin tail booms tapered in plan to a vertical rudder post, and joined the wings at the junctions of the rear spars and inboard interplane struts. A triangular fin was inset in the booms, and a rudder, with curved outline, was fitted. The rectangular tailplane, with tapered tips, was mounted on the top longerons and carried a divided elevator.
The nacelle was long and shallow and basically square in section. It carried a nose mounted radiator and had a raised decking to protect the pilot and passenger, aft of which the top was open. The Green engine was mounted aft with the cylinders protruding above the top of the nacelle, with fuel provided by a gravity tank under the top wing. The machine was mounted on a complex chassis of struts and cross members on twin floats.
The PB.l was converted to the PB.2 by the change to an air-cooled rotary. This enabled the nose radiator to be dispensed with, with a consequent improvement to the shape of the nacelle and rearrangement of the rear portion for the new engine installation.
The first test flight was carried by J. Lankester Parker, who later was for many years the chief test pilot for Short Bros. Ding also flew the machine but little is known of its use in the early war years.
Power:
PB.l 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled
PB.2 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NATURA ornithopter (N.R. Gordon)
This machine was reported in The Car Illustrated as being at the 1910 Aero Show, but was ignored by the aviation press. The illustration published was of a small flapping wing monoplane. The wings, which were heavily cambered and gull-shaped, were mounted at the top of a tubular structure. The operator was seated below and pedaled to provide the motion, through a system of levers. An extension of the chassis, which was mounted on three wheels, carried a fixed horizontal tail surface.
This machine was reported in The Car Illustrated as being at the 1910 Aero Show, but was ignored by the aviation press. The illustration published was of a small flapping wing monoplane. The wings, which were heavily cambered and gull-shaped, were mounted at the top of a tubular structure. The operator was seated below and pedaled to provide the motion, through a system of levers. An extension of the chassis, which was mounted on three wheels, carried a fixed horizontal tail surface.
Natura ornithopter at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910 received little mention and was an obvious lost cause.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NEALE Pup monoplane (J.V. Neale, Aeronautical Society Experimental Ground, Dagenham, Essex)
A report in The Aero, 31 May 1910 (p.425), stated that Neale had been involved in aeronautics for many years and had built a successful airship twelve years before, in 1898, although this has not been confirmed. However, Neale brought his first monoplane to Dagenham in the middle of 1909, where he tested and improved it, prior to taking it to the Blackpool Meeting held 18 to 25 October 1909. Although the machine was assembled, the weather conditions made flying impractical and Neale complained that his machine had been damaged in a leaking shed. On returning from Blackpool Neale transferred to Brooklands shed No.6.
The Pup was a small tractor monoplane with a triangular section, wooden, braced fuselage girder, originally mounted on a transverse bamboo axle, with bicycle wheels and forks, which were also used at the tail. The undercarriage was improved before the machine reached Blackpool.
The wings were heavily cambered and included chord-wise endplates; stiffeners at the outboard of the outer section provided hinge points for the wide chord, overhanging ailerons. The tail surfaces consisted of a biplane elevator and long trailing rudder behind. An inverted vee-shaped pylon, behind the engine, served to anchor the bracing wires and as a mounting for fuel and oil tanks. Spruce and bamboo were used in the construction of this rather crude machine.
Power: 9/12hp JAP twin-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 6in diameter propeller at 3 to 1 reduction by a gearbox below the propeller.
Data
Span 18ft
Chord 5ft
Weight allup 420lb.
NEALE monoplane 1909-1910 (J.V. Neale, Brooklands Shed No.6)
At Brooklands Neale was reported in The Aero to have made a successful flight on 5 December 1909 on his 'Bleriot' monoplane, when he covered the whole length of the aerodrome at a height of fifteen feet, having previously made several short flights at no great distance from the ground. This was almost certainly on the machine now described, which was considerably different from that taken to Blackpool.
The fuselage girder was rectangular in section with a Bleriot-like undercarriage, with trailing axle and wheels and with a tail skid. The tail unit consisted of a long fixed tailplane extending well forward along the top of the fuselage, with triangular shaped divided elevators and rudder. The wings incorporated shortspan ailerons, inset into the wings. A coolant radiator stood above the fuselage by the pylon in front of the pilot.
Power: 24hp ENV type H four-cylinder water-cooled horizontally opposed.
A report in The Aero, 31 May 1910 (p.425), stated that Neale had been involved in aeronautics for many years and had built a successful airship twelve years before, in 1898, although this has not been confirmed. However, Neale brought his first monoplane to Dagenham in the middle of 1909, where he tested and improved it, prior to taking it to the Blackpool Meeting held 18 to 25 October 1909. Although the machine was assembled, the weather conditions made flying impractical and Neale complained that his machine had been damaged in a leaking shed. On returning from Blackpool Neale transferred to Brooklands shed No.6.
The Pup was a small tractor monoplane with a triangular section, wooden, braced fuselage girder, originally mounted on a transverse bamboo axle, with bicycle wheels and forks, which were also used at the tail. The undercarriage was improved before the machine reached Blackpool.
The wings were heavily cambered and included chord-wise endplates; stiffeners at the outboard of the outer section provided hinge points for the wide chord, overhanging ailerons. The tail surfaces consisted of a biplane elevator and long trailing rudder behind. An inverted vee-shaped pylon, behind the engine, served to anchor the bracing wires and as a mounting for fuel and oil tanks. Spruce and bamboo were used in the construction of this rather crude machine.
Power: 9/12hp JAP twin-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 6ft 6in diameter propeller at 3 to 1 reduction by a gearbox below the propeller.
Data
Span 18ft
Chord 5ft
Weight allup 420lb.
NEALE monoplane 1909-1910 (J.V. Neale, Brooklands Shed No.6)
At Brooklands Neale was reported in The Aero to have made a successful flight on 5 December 1909 on his 'Bleriot' monoplane, when he covered the whole length of the aerodrome at a height of fifteen feet, having previously made several short flights at no great distance from the ground. This was almost certainly on the machine now described, which was considerably different from that taken to Blackpool.
The fuselage girder was rectangular in section with a Bleriot-like undercarriage, with trailing axle and wheels and with a tail skid. The tail unit consisted of a long fixed tailplane extending well forward along the top of the fuselage, with triangular shaped divided elevators and rudder. The wings incorporated shortspan ailerons, inset into the wings. A coolant radiator stood above the fuselage by the pylon in front of the pilot.
Power: 24hp ENV type H four-cylinder water-cooled horizontally opposed.
Neale Pup monoplane. Neale took this to the Blackpool Meeting of October 1909 but did not fly due to damage and weather conditions.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NEALE VI monoplane
This was, it seems, a reconstruction of the previous machine that was being tested in May 1910 at Brooklands. Neale flew the machine on 21 May 1910 with only a 9hp JAP but the fuselage broke on landing, after the failure of the undercarriage. It was later rebuilt with a more powerful engine. The Petre brothers, Howard Flanders and possibly W.O. Manning were involved with the rebuild.
The fuselage, undercarriage and wings were the same as those described before, except that the fuselage was fully covered with fabric. The tail surfaces were completely new; there was now a biplane tail with flexible trailing edge for control in pitch. The rudder was a flexible continuation of the fuselage. A long shallow fin was fitted ahead of the tail unit, on top of the fuselage, with a bicycle type tail wheel below.
Power:
9hp JAP twin-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 7ft 8in diameter propeller
20hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 7ft 10in diameter propeller
Reduction gearing of 6 to 1 and 3.25 to 1 were fitted to these engines with the propeller shaft passing through the gap between the cylinders.
Data
Span 27ft (30ft *)
Chord 5ft
Area 140 sq. ft
Length 19ft 10in
Biplane tail 9ft 6in by 2ft 6in
Biplane tail area 50 sq. ft
Weight 360 lb.
Weight allup 490 lb. (530 lb.*)
*rebuilt version
This was, it seems, a reconstruction of the previous machine that was being tested in May 1910 at Brooklands. Neale flew the machine on 21 May 1910 with only a 9hp JAP but the fuselage broke on landing, after the failure of the undercarriage. It was later rebuilt with a more powerful engine. The Petre brothers, Howard Flanders and possibly W.O. Manning were involved with the rebuild.
The fuselage, undercarriage and wings were the same as those described before, except that the fuselage was fully covered with fabric. The tail surfaces were completely new; there was now a biplane tail with flexible trailing edge for control in pitch. The rudder was a flexible continuation of the fuselage. A long shallow fin was fitted ahead of the tail unit, on top of the fuselage, with a bicycle type tail wheel below.
Power:
9hp JAP twin-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 7ft 8in diameter propeller
20hp JAP four-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 7ft 10in diameter propeller
Reduction gearing of 6 to 1 and 3.25 to 1 were fitted to these engines with the propeller shaft passing through the gap between the cylinders.
Data
Span 27ft (30ft *)
Chord 5ft
Area 140 sq. ft
Length 19ft 10in
Biplane tail 9ft 6in by 2ft 6in
Biplane tail area 50 sq. ft
Weight 360 lb.
Weight allup 490 lb. (530 lb.*)
*rebuilt version
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NEALE VII biplane (J.V. Neale, Neale's Aeroplane Works, Baker St., Weybridge)
Neale had by now acquired a works in Weybridge, but continued to fly at Brooklands He brought out the biplane from his shed on 8 August 1910, taxied it for the first time and flew it soon after. Its origin and ownership became the subject of some controversy, with a pupil pilot named Rippin, who damaged it at the end of September, after which only Neale seems to have handled the machine until flying ceased in November.
The machine was designed with a control system to avoid problems over the Wright patent for lateral control. Although different from the methods of control in general use, its originality was contested from as far afield as America and Australia in letters to the press.
This was Neale's last design, although in November, he was proposing the construction of a large dirigible, for which he was seeking funds. It is believed that the Neale biplane was dismantled and the parts used in a machine by another hopeful constructor.
The layout was of a conventional, equal span pusher biplane of the period, with front and rear elevators carried on booms, which were parallel in plan. A special feature was the omission of a rudder at the tail, this being replaced by rudders at each wing tip. These were of single acting type and were hinged on posts just behind the front outer interplane struts, where they not only provided directional control, but caused a 'screened area' over the top wing tip and aileron. Lift was thereby lost on one side, sufficient to make the ailerons redundant, and these were disconnected.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 7ft 9in diameter propeller
Data
Span 34ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Gap 6ft
Area 400 sq. ft
Area tailplane 52 1/2 sq. ft
Area rear elevator 26 sq. ft
Area front elevator 24 sq. ft
Area screen rudder 15 1/2 sq. ft each
Length 41ft
Weight 800 lb.
Max speed 41mph
Neale had by now acquired a works in Weybridge, but continued to fly at Brooklands He brought out the biplane from his shed on 8 August 1910, taxied it for the first time and flew it soon after. Its origin and ownership became the subject of some controversy, with a pupil pilot named Rippin, who damaged it at the end of September, after which only Neale seems to have handled the machine until flying ceased in November.
The machine was designed with a control system to avoid problems over the Wright patent for lateral control. Although different from the methods of control in general use, its originality was contested from as far afield as America and Australia in letters to the press.
This was Neale's last design, although in November, he was proposing the construction of a large dirigible, for which he was seeking funds. It is believed that the Neale biplane was dismantled and the parts used in a machine by another hopeful constructor.
The layout was of a conventional, equal span pusher biplane of the period, with front and rear elevators carried on booms, which were parallel in plan. A special feature was the omission of a rudder at the tail, this being replaced by rudders at each wing tip. These were of single acting type and were hinged on posts just behind the front outer interplane struts, where they not only provided directional control, but caused a 'screened area' over the top wing tip and aileron. Lift was thereby lost on one side, sufficient to make the ailerons redundant, and these were disconnected.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 7ft 9in diameter propeller
Data
Span 34ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Gap 6ft
Area 400 sq. ft
Area tailplane 52 1/2 sq. ft
Area rear elevator 26 sq. ft
Area front elevator 24 sq. ft
Area screen rudder 15 1/2 sq. ft each
Length 41ft
Weight 800 lb.
Max speed 41mph
Neale VII biplane of 1910 with an original system of control. It could be flown with ailerons disconnected.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NEWINGTON monoplane (Thomas L. Bell, St. George's St., Fenny Arches, Hull and E.M. Ling, 22 Parliament St., Hull)
Bell was the superintending engineer of the Newington Steam Trawling Co., the sponsors, and construction was the responsibility of his uncle, Mr. Jackson. E.M. Ling was presumably involved with design, being concerned with patents Nos.21956/1909 and 29614/1909. John Work was appointed president of a subsidiary Newington Monoplane Co.
The machine was exhibited at Hull Royal Institute in 1909 and was then taken, it is thought, to Hedon Racecourse for trials. Mechanical problems and damage from outside storage persisted up till the time when an attempt to fly was made, when the machine was finally wrecked.
The machine was a tractor monoplane with high wing positioned clear of the sides of the fuselage. This was built with a boat-like front section with vertical prow, the rear portion continuing as a diagonally braced open girder carrying fins above and below, with one piece rudder and a tailplane on top, with divided elevators. The undercarriage was sprung and consisted of a pair of motorcycle size wheels at the front, and a pair of bicycle type wheels, in separate forks, at the rear.
Power was apparently provided by a three-cylinder 40hp engine, mounted well back in the fuselage, driving the Handley Page propeller through a long shaft. The engine was water cooled by an array of pipes under the body, the underside of which, was partly open to reveal the presence of a water pump and other parts of the engine installation.
Data
Span 30ft 9in
Length 26ft 3in
Bell was the superintending engineer of the Newington Steam Trawling Co., the sponsors, and construction was the responsibility of his uncle, Mr. Jackson. E.M. Ling was presumably involved with design, being concerned with patents Nos.21956/1909 and 29614/1909. John Work was appointed president of a subsidiary Newington Monoplane Co.
The machine was exhibited at Hull Royal Institute in 1909 and was then taken, it is thought, to Hedon Racecourse for trials. Mechanical problems and damage from outside storage persisted up till the time when an attempt to fly was made, when the machine was finally wrecked.
The machine was a tractor monoplane with high wing positioned clear of the sides of the fuselage. This was built with a boat-like front section with vertical prow, the rear portion continuing as a diagonally braced open girder carrying fins above and below, with one piece rudder and a tailplane on top, with divided elevators. The undercarriage was sprung and consisted of a pair of motorcycle size wheels at the front, and a pair of bicycle type wheels, in separate forks, at the rear.
Power was apparently provided by a three-cylinder 40hp engine, mounted well back in the fuselage, driving the Handley Page propeller through a long shaft. The engine was water cooled by an array of pipes under the body, the underside of which, was partly open to reveal the presence of a water pump and other parts of the engine installation.
Data
Span 30ft 9in
Length 26ft 3in
Newington (Ling) monoplane built at Hull and exhibited there in 1909. Failed to achieve flight on test in 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NICHOLSON monoplane (Built by Holland & Holland Ltd., 479488 Oxford St., W)
This Bleriot-like monoplane was built by a well-known firm of coach builders for Mr. B.H. Nicholson, and was shown on the stand of the Royal Aero Club at Olympia in March 1910. Its subsequent use is not recorded.
Some differences from the standard Bleriot were apparent, such as the addition of a tall triangular shaped fin above the fuselage and a triangular shaped tailplane below the bottom longerons.
Power: 25hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke driving a 8ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 32ft 6in
Chord 7ft
Area 227 sq. ft
Area elevators 18 sq. ft
Area rudder: 5 l/2sq ft
Weight 800 lb.
Length 32ft
Price ?550
This Bleriot-like monoplane was built by a well-known firm of coach builders for Mr. B.H. Nicholson, and was shown on the stand of the Royal Aero Club at Olympia in March 1910. Its subsequent use is not recorded.
Some differences from the standard Bleriot were apparent, such as the addition of a tall triangular shaped fin above the fuselage and a triangular shaped tailplane below the bottom longerons.
Power: 25hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke driving a 8ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 32ft 6in
Chord 7ft
Area 227 sq. ft
Area elevators 18 sq. ft
Area rudder: 5 l/2sq ft
Weight 800 lb.
Length 32ft
Price ?550
Nicholson monoplane built by coachbuilders Holland and Holland Ltd. was on the Royal Aero Club stand at Olympia in March 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NORTH LONDON "FLYING HOUSE" multiplane (built at Alexandra Palace, Hornsey, London N)
It is difficult to believe that the Flying House here illustrated was seriously expected to fly and might just have been a fantasy in the mind of an eccentric inventor. However, the Illustrated London News of 10 November 1906 reported that it was built by a party of Frenchmen in the grounds of the Alexandra Palace (perhaps with the assistance of Auguste Gaudron, the balloon-maker, whose workshop was nearby). The machine had eight aluminium wings, each fifty-four feet long, and four propellers. The proposed powerplant is not known. The multiplane was designed to carry 100 passengers in some comfort. Needless to say there are no reports of it having flown and it was probably never completed.
This is almost certainly the flying machine described by "A.D." of the Alexandra Park Aviation Works, 77 Duke's Avenue, Muswell Hill, London N in his letter of 10 January 1905 to Patrick Alexander in which he offered to sell him patent rights to enable the construction to be finished. "A.D." stated that the machine was half-built and all the pieces of the mechanism were at hand. ?2000 was required to complete the project.
The machine was 65ft long, 13ft wide and 19ft 6in high. It had eight wings, each 48ft 9in long and of 6ft 6in chord. The total wing span was 104ft. The engine was of about 100hp and drove four propellers. It was designed to carry 200 people at 60mph.
Whilst Patrick Alexander was very generous with his support of aeronautical projects, it would seem that on this occasion he decided that the project was without any merit. Nothing further was heard of the Flying House.
It is difficult to believe that the Flying House here illustrated was seriously expected to fly and might just have been a fantasy in the mind of an eccentric inventor. However, the Illustrated London News of 10 November 1906 reported that it was built by a party of Frenchmen in the grounds of the Alexandra Palace (perhaps with the assistance of Auguste Gaudron, the balloon-maker, whose workshop was nearby). The machine had eight aluminium wings, each fifty-four feet long, and four propellers. The proposed powerplant is not known. The multiplane was designed to carry 100 passengers in some comfort. Needless to say there are no reports of it having flown and it was probably never completed.
This is almost certainly the flying machine described by "A.D." of the Alexandra Park Aviation Works, 77 Duke's Avenue, Muswell Hill, London N in his letter of 10 January 1905 to Patrick Alexander in which he offered to sell him patent rights to enable the construction to be finished. "A.D." stated that the machine was half-built and all the pieces of the mechanism were at hand. ?2000 was required to complete the project.
The machine was 65ft long, 13ft wide and 19ft 6in high. It had eight wings, each 48ft 9in long and of 6ft 6in chord. The total wing span was 104ft. The engine was of about 100hp and drove four propellers. It was designed to carry 200 people at 60mph.
Whilst Patrick Alexander was very generous with his support of aeronautical projects, it would seem that on this occasion he decided that the project was without any merit. Nothing further was heard of the Flying House.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NOTTINGHAM monoplane (Messrs. Searby, Allen & Searby, Hartley Rd., Nottingham)
This rather fragile looking two-seater tractor monoplane, of conventional layout, was built by the above individuals, who wrote to Flight (25 November 1911 p.1031), outlining their lack of success in forming an aero club in the area.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled
This rather fragile looking two-seater tractor monoplane, of conventional layout, was built by the above individuals, who wrote to Flight (25 November 1911 p.1031), outlining their lack of success in forming an aero club in the area.
Power: 30hp Alvaston two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
NYBORG monoplane (T.G. Nyborg, 9 Chelsea Grove, Newcastle-on-Tyne, Northumberland)
Although trials of this machine were earned out at Bolden Racecourse, there is no evidence that flight was achieved. An entry in Jane's of 1909 gave no details, but photographs reveal the general configuration.
The machine consisted of a central structure of tubes, in which the engine, of unknown type, and the pilot were accommodated. Twin tractor propellers were driven by chains or belts. The narrow track undercarriage consisted of two bicycle wheels with a central skid and a smaller rear wheel mounted well forward.
The gull-shaped wings were constructed with the inboard trailing sections divided into smaller flexible sections, apparently to simulate a bird's wing and these sections may have been controllable. A fixed horizontal surface, perhaps with a flexible trailing section for pitch control, was provided but there were no vertical tail surfaces.
The machine was quite low, probably no more than four feet high, but with a wing span approaching 40ft. Patent No.11961/1909 may be relevant.
The Northumberland and Durham Aero Club, of which Nyborg was a member, was unsuccessful in raising sufficient interest to run meetings in June and September 1910.
Although trials of this machine were earned out at Bolden Racecourse, there is no evidence that flight was achieved. An entry in Jane's of 1909 gave no details, but photographs reveal the general configuration.
The machine consisted of a central structure of tubes, in which the engine, of unknown type, and the pilot were accommodated. Twin tractor propellers were driven by chains or belts. The narrow track undercarriage consisted of two bicycle wheels with a central skid and a smaller rear wheel mounted well forward.
The gull-shaped wings were constructed with the inboard trailing sections divided into smaller flexible sections, apparently to simulate a bird's wing and these sections may have been controllable. A fixed horizontal surface, perhaps with a flexible trailing section for pitch control, was provided but there were no vertical tail surfaces.
The machine was quite low, probably no more than four feet high, but with a wing span approaching 40ft. Patent No.11961/1909 may be relevant.
The Northumberland and Durham Aero Club, of which Nyborg was a member, was unsuccessful in raising sufficient interest to run meetings in June and September 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
OLIVER biplane (R.G. Oliver, Cafe Windmill, Cricklewood, London NW)
This biplane, designed in 1911, was similar in many respects to the early Avro biplanes except that it had twin pusher propellers mounted mid-gap behind the trailing edge of the wings. The propellers were driven by chains or belts from a water cooled engine "of Wright type" in the nose of the machine.
The biplane appears not to have been completed and its wings and other parts were offered for sale in Flight of 14 October 1911.
This biplane, designed in 1911, was similar in many respects to the early Avro biplanes except that it had twin pusher propellers mounted mid-gap behind the trailing edge of the wings. The propellers were driven by chains or belts from a water cooled engine "of Wright type" in the nose of the machine.
The biplane appears not to have been completed and its wings and other parts were offered for sale in Flight of 14 October 1911.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
OTTINO-WYLLIE Direct Lift device (G.P. Ottino and A. Wyllie)
This impractical device was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910. It consisted of a series of tilting planes on an endless chain, intended to act as 'paddles'. No motor was fitted and there were no controls. Nothing further was heard of this machine. Patent No.9378 of 1909 refers.
This impractical device was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1910. It consisted of a series of tilting planes on an endless chain, intended to act as 'paddles'. No motor was fitted and there were no controls. Nothing further was heard of this machine. Patent No.9378 of 1909 refers.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PARKES biplane No.l (C.H. Parkes)
This first experimental machine, made by Parkes, was a two-bay biplane mounted on a bicycle and fitted with a biplane front elevator and tail rudder. The pedals drove a pusher propeller only, the chain to the rear wheel being disconnected. A speed of nine mph was reached on the level, but the machine would only lift off for a yard or two, when tested down a slope in 1909.
PARKES biplane No.2
This was a motor powered pusher biplane, with large front divided elevator, capable of being operated together or independently. Separate single-acting ailerons were mounted behind the trailing edge of the top wing. The machine was mounted on a three-wheeled chassis with a 4hp vee-twin air-cooled engine behind the pilot, driving by chain a shaft, on which was mounted a pusher propeller. The allup weight was 350 lb. Jumps of 10-40 feet in length were made in the summer of 1909.
This first experimental machine, made by Parkes, was a two-bay biplane mounted on a bicycle and fitted with a biplane front elevator and tail rudder. The pedals drove a pusher propeller only, the chain to the rear wheel being disconnected. A speed of nine mph was reached on the level, but the machine would only lift off for a yard or two, when tested down a slope in 1909.
PARKES biplane No.2
This was a motor powered pusher biplane, with large front divided elevator, capable of being operated together or independently. Separate single-acting ailerons were mounted behind the trailing edge of the top wing. The machine was mounted on a three-wheeled chassis with a 4hp vee-twin air-cooled engine behind the pilot, driving by chain a shaft, on which was mounted a pusher propeller. The allup weight was 350 lb. Jumps of 10-40 feet in length were made in the summer of 1909.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PARKES monoplane (C.H. Parkes & Parkes, Monmouth)
This machine was constructed for Parkes by T Preece & Co., coach builders of Monmouth.
It was a single-seat tractor monoplane with front and rear elevators and rear rudder, all mounted on an open girder structure on a three wheeled undercarriage. The high wing was heavily cambered and double surfaced, and was surmounted by a bracing pylon. Single acting wide chord ailerons were hinged behind the trailing edge of the wing and there were hoop shaped wingtip skids. The engine was positioned just ahead of the wing on a level with the top longerons, with the pilot seated behind the trailing edge.
The machine flew for the first time on 7 July 1910, but there were no reports of any further progress. A biplane, said to be under construction by Parkes brother, did not materialize.
Power: 20hp JAP vee-twin air-cooled with auxiliary exhaust ports, driving a variable pitch Chauviere propeller.
Data
Span 28ft 3in
Area 200 sq. ft
Length 28ft 3in
Weight 500 lb.
This machine was constructed for Parkes by T Preece & Co., coach builders of Monmouth.
It was a single-seat tractor monoplane with front and rear elevators and rear rudder, all mounted on an open girder structure on a three wheeled undercarriage. The high wing was heavily cambered and double surfaced, and was surmounted by a bracing pylon. Single acting wide chord ailerons were hinged behind the trailing edge of the wing and there were hoop shaped wingtip skids. The engine was positioned just ahead of the wing on a level with the top longerons, with the pilot seated behind the trailing edge.
The machine flew for the first time on 7 July 1910, but there were no reports of any further progress. A biplane, said to be under construction by Parkes brother, did not materialize.
Power: 20hp JAP vee-twin air-cooled with auxiliary exhaust ports, driving a variable pitch Chauviere propeller.
Data
Span 28ft 3in
Area 200 sq. ft
Length 28ft 3in
Weight 500 lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PARSONS biplane (J.G. Parsons and Percy Maxwell Muller, Shed No.6, Brooklands)
P.M. Muller, who later became manager of Vickers at Brooklands in wartime, designed and built this biplane primarily for testing the Parsons Pendulum Paddle-Wheel Stabilizer. The machine was flown in May 1913, by John Alcock, later of Atlantic crossing fame, and also by Jack Humphries, without the stabilizer fitted; although using a heavy car engine weighing 400 lb. with radiators, the machine flew well reaching 1500 feet in twenty minutes. The stabilizers, which were mounted in the gap between each wingtip, were presumably tried and found wanting, as was the Aster engine, for it was replaced in August by a Gnome.
Alcock was involved in a collision on the ground with the Champel biplane on 4 August 1913, in spite of which he started soon after in a race, but was soon forced to land. In September the machine was sold to a recent pupil of the Bristol School named Boger, who crashed it on 11 December 1913 at Ripley, when attempting to land there to breakfast at the Talbot Hotel. The remains were bought by Pemberton Billing and some parts were used in the construction of the Gaskell-Blackbum biplane.
Some features of the Caudron were embodied in the Parsons. The wing structure in particular employing closely spaced interplane struts and a similar system of warping of the top outer wing panels. Flexing of the tailplane for control, instead of a separate elevator, was also similar to the Caudron.
The fuselage was an ash and spruce girder, fabric covered in the area of the pilot's seat with the fabric tapering to a cone shape inside the structure, which was open back to the tail. The main undercarriage had a wide track and consisted of six ash struts and twin skids with a rubber cord sprung axle. The tail was supported by a cane, hoop-shaped tail skid. The engine was cooled by two radiators mounted behind, partially in the fuselage, behind which were fuel and oil tanks, followed by the pilot in his hammock type seat.
Power:
40hp Aster four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 8ft 2in diameter Normale propeller
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary from July 1913
Data
Span top 39ft 6in
Span bottom 25ft
Chord 4ft 7in
Area 295 sq. ft
Area tailplane/elevator 40 sq. ft
Area rudder 9 sq. ft
Length 26ft 4in
P.M. Muller, who later became manager of Vickers at Brooklands in wartime, designed and built this biplane primarily for testing the Parsons Pendulum Paddle-Wheel Stabilizer. The machine was flown in May 1913, by John Alcock, later of Atlantic crossing fame, and also by Jack Humphries, without the stabilizer fitted; although using a heavy car engine weighing 400 lb. with radiators, the machine flew well reaching 1500 feet in twenty minutes. The stabilizers, which were mounted in the gap between each wingtip, were presumably tried and found wanting, as was the Aster engine, for it was replaced in August by a Gnome.
Alcock was involved in a collision on the ground with the Champel biplane on 4 August 1913, in spite of which he started soon after in a race, but was soon forced to land. In September the machine was sold to a recent pupil of the Bristol School named Boger, who crashed it on 11 December 1913 at Ripley, when attempting to land there to breakfast at the Talbot Hotel. The remains were bought by Pemberton Billing and some parts were used in the construction of the Gaskell-Blackbum biplane.
Some features of the Caudron were embodied in the Parsons. The wing structure in particular employing closely spaced interplane struts and a similar system of warping of the top outer wing panels. Flexing of the tailplane for control, instead of a separate elevator, was also similar to the Caudron.
The fuselage was an ash and spruce girder, fabric covered in the area of the pilot's seat with the fabric tapering to a cone shape inside the structure, which was open back to the tail. The main undercarriage had a wide track and consisted of six ash struts and twin skids with a rubber cord sprung axle. The tail was supported by a cane, hoop-shaped tail skid. The engine was cooled by two radiators mounted behind, partially in the fuselage, behind which were fuel and oil tanks, followed by the pilot in his hammock type seat.
Power:
40hp Aster four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 8ft 2in diameter Normale propeller
70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary from July 1913
Data
Span top 39ft 6in
Span bottom 25ft
Chord 4ft 7in
Area 295 sq. ft
Area tailplane/elevator 40 sq. ft
Area rudder 9 sq. ft
Length 26ft 4in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PASHLEY biplane (Cecil Lawrence Pashley and Eric Clowes Pashley, Shoreham)
This pusher type two-seater was built by the Pashley Brothers in 1914 and it competed soon after its first trials, in a race for the Brighton Cup and .70, which Eric Pashley won on 11 July 1914.
The machine was basically of Farman type with ailerons on the top wing and a cumbersome four wheeled undercarriage, which it was planned to replace with a neater two wheeled vee type.
The engine was a 50hp Gnome, also to be replaced by a 100hp Monosoupape Gnome, but it is believed that these further developments were curtailed by the outbreak of war. The machine continued in use as a trainer at Shoreham.
Data
Weight 800 lb.
Speed 61mph
This pusher type two-seater was built by the Pashley Brothers in 1914 and it competed soon after its first trials, in a race for the Brighton Cup and .70, which Eric Pashley won on 11 July 1914.
The machine was basically of Farman type with ailerons on the top wing and a cumbersome four wheeled undercarriage, which it was planned to replace with a neater two wheeled vee type.
The engine was a 50hp Gnome, also to be replaced by a 100hp Monosoupape Gnome, but it is believed that these further developments were curtailed by the outbreak of war. The machine continued in use as a trainer at Shoreham.
Data
Weight 800 lb.
Speed 61mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PASSAT ornithopter No.l (Monsieur J.B. Passat, Wimbledon, Surrey, assisted by Monsieur Martiniere)
Passat was a Frenchman living in England, who experimented with flapping wings from 1905. In 1908 he built his first machine in his garden at Wimbledon, and took it on to Wimbledon Common for its first and only trial, when it traveled at speed for some distance, being airborne for at least twenty yards, before being wrecked against a tree. He was present at Olympia in March 1909 demonstrating his flapping wing principle to visitors at the Aero Show.
The machine consisted of a welded tubular frame, faired to streamlined shape and mounted on three wheels. Two pairs of wings were fitted in tandem; the front pair serving as elevators and for lateral control. The rear pair flapped to provide propulsion, driven by the motor, which also drove the rear wheel. A tailplane, fin and rudder were fitted, together with a small fixed surface at the nose. The wings could be folded to enable the machine to be driven along the road.
Power: 4 l/2hp Werner two-cylinder air-cooled motor cycle engine
Data
Span 24ft
Length 20ft
Weight 300 lb.
PASSAT ornithopter No.2 Seagull
A second machine was built in 1909-1910 on generally similar lines to No.l, but strengthened and with a tractor propeller. Passat took this machine to Brooklands and tested it in the summer, without success. It was further reported to have flown between 100 and 150 yards after taking off at less than 15 mph.
Power: 8hp George of unknown type
Passat was a Frenchman living in England, who experimented with flapping wings from 1905. In 1908 he built his first machine in his garden at Wimbledon, and took it on to Wimbledon Common for its first and only trial, when it traveled at speed for some distance, being airborne for at least twenty yards, before being wrecked against a tree. He was present at Olympia in March 1909 demonstrating his flapping wing principle to visitors at the Aero Show.
The machine consisted of a welded tubular frame, faired to streamlined shape and mounted on three wheels. Two pairs of wings were fitted in tandem; the front pair serving as elevators and for lateral control. The rear pair flapped to provide propulsion, driven by the motor, which also drove the rear wheel. A tailplane, fin and rudder were fitted, together with a small fixed surface at the nose. The wings could be folded to enable the machine to be driven along the road.
Power: 4 l/2hp Werner two-cylinder air-cooled motor cycle engine
Data
Span 24ft
Length 20ft
Weight 300 lb.
PASSAT ornithopter No.2 Seagull
A second machine was built in 1909-1910 on generally similar lines to No.l, but strengthened and with a tractor propeller. Passat took this machine to Brooklands and tested it in the summer, without success. It was further reported to have flown between 100 and 150 yards after taking off at less than 15 mph.
Power: 8hp George of unknown type
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PASSAT monoplane Seagull
Although lacking confirmation, it seems likely that Passat converted the ornithopter into a monoplane with variable incidence wings, as illustrated in Flight 3 February 1912 (p.109). Reportedly fitted with a 15hp Anzani engine, it suffered from engine problems, but may have been the machine with which flights of 100-150 yards were achieved on Wimbledon Common in 1912.
Passat became a naturalized Englishman and, much later, made further attempts with flapping wings at Surbiton, on a machine he termed a 'Helithopter.'
Although lacking confirmation, it seems likely that Passat converted the ornithopter into a monoplane with variable incidence wings, as illustrated in Flight 3 February 1912 (p.109). Reportedly fitted with a 15hp Anzani engine, it suffered from engine problems, but may have been the machine with which flights of 100-150 yards were achieved on Wimbledon Common in 1912.
Passat became a naturalized Englishman and, much later, made further attempts with flapping wings at Surbiton, on a machine he termed a 'Helithopter.'
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PATERSON biplane No.l (Compton Cecil Paterson., Freshfield Sands, Lancashire)
Paterson was a director of the Liverpool Motor House Ltd., and his biplane was built there in 1909-1910, making its first flight from the beach at Freshfield on 14 May 1910. The second flight on 23 June 1910 resulted in damage, which was repaired by the end of July. After this the aircraft flew well and was used by Paterson to obtain his aviators certificate No.38 issued on 6 December 1910. He used the machine for passenger carrying and acquired a considerable amount of flight experience. In November it was reported to have flown over 160 miles and that a second machine, with a more powerful engine, was being built. This was for Gerald Higginbotham and was completed in January 1911, the two Paterson machines being housed in adjacent hangars at Freshfield.
The Paterson biplane was basically of Curtiss type, constructed of ash, spruce and bamboo with a tubular steel undercarriage. Paterson arranged the machine for easy transport, by designing the outer wings for quick removal and assembly.
The machine had a biplane front elevator with a small triangular fin on top, the single rear elevator carried the rudder, which was cut away at the center to allow it to swing clear of the elevator. The ailerons were originally mounted in midgap on the interplane struts, but were moved to the trailing edges of the top wings; they were of single acting type and were enlarged with a part circular trailing edge shape. For early flights wheels were fitted at the wing tips.
Power:
1st machine 25-30hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan type semi-radial
2nd machine 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 34ft 4in
Weight with 6 gal fuel 600 lb. for 90 miles
Length 31ft
Speed 41mph
Price .625
Paterson was a director of the Liverpool Motor House Ltd., and his biplane was built there in 1909-1910, making its first flight from the beach at Freshfield on 14 May 1910. The second flight on 23 June 1910 resulted in damage, which was repaired by the end of July. After this the aircraft flew well and was used by Paterson to obtain his aviators certificate No.38 issued on 6 December 1910. He used the machine for passenger carrying and acquired a considerable amount of flight experience. In November it was reported to have flown over 160 miles and that a second machine, with a more powerful engine, was being built. This was for Gerald Higginbotham and was completed in January 1911, the two Paterson machines being housed in adjacent hangars at Freshfield.
The Paterson biplane was basically of Curtiss type, constructed of ash, spruce and bamboo with a tubular steel undercarriage. Paterson arranged the machine for easy transport, by designing the outer wings for quick removal and assembly.
The machine had a biplane front elevator with a small triangular fin on top, the single rear elevator carried the rudder, which was cut away at the center to allow it to swing clear of the elevator. The ailerons were originally mounted in midgap on the interplane struts, but were moved to the trailing edges of the top wings; they were of single acting type and were enlarged with a part circular trailing edge shape. For early flights wheels were fitted at the wing tips.
Power:
1st machine 25-30hp Anzani three-cylinder air-cooled fan type semi-radial
2nd machine 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 34ft 4in
Weight with 6 gal fuel 600 lb. for 90 miles
Length 31ft
Speed 41mph
Price .625
Paterson biplane No.l. The version with Gnome engine, modified ailerons and other improvements late in 1910.
Mr. C. C. Paterson in the pilot's seat of his British-built biplane, which he made some short flights at Liverpool recently, as recorded in FLIGHT last week.
Paterson biplane No.l built at the Liverpool Motor House where he was a director and tested at Freshfield sands in 1910.
Paterson biplane No.l built at the Liverpool Motor House where he was a director and tested at Freshfield sands in 1910.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PATERSON biplane No.2
In the spring of 1911 Paterson left Liverpool to become an instructor for the Grahame-White School at Hendon, remaining there till late in the year, during which time he designed a new aircraft, which he planned to take to South Africa. This time the machine was constructed by Lawton's Motor Body Works, Cricklewood London NW. Paterson flew the machine for the first time from a field near the Welsh Harp on 18 October 1911, with some damage occurring, when he was forced to land in a restricted space with a blocked fuel pipe.
The machine was soon repaired, but it seems unlikely that it reached Brooklands when ready, as reported to be Paterson's intention. Time was short before the machine was to be packed for shipment on the SS Garth Castle on 11 November 1911. Paterson's team in the African Aviation Syndicate consisted of his assistant pilot, E.F Driver, manager Guy Livingston and several mechanics. Apart from having the Bleriot agency for Africa, the object was to interest the government and public in aviation, and to set up a flying school.
The party arrived at Cape Town in early December and gave demonstrations straight away, but Paterson crashed on 26 December 1911, when the fabric on the tail split open and he suffered injuries. The early problem overcome, Paterson and Driver flew considerable distances to give demonstrations, using the biplane, Driver's Bleriot, and a Farman built earlier by John Weston at Brandfoort in the Orange Free State.
In March 1912 Driver crashed the Bleriot badly, although it was later rebuilt, but by September the African Aviation Syndicate was in liquidation. However, Paterson acquired the assets and persuaded local business men to finance a new scheme, the Paterson Aviation Syndicate, for which he obtained a contract from the government to train ten military pilots, beginning in September 1913. For this he required a new instructor and E.W. Cheeseman late of the Grahame-White school, came out, but he crashed and was killed on 13 October 1913. At that time there were two Paterson biplanes in use at Alexandersfontein, near Kimberley; the second biplane, built by Mr. H. Carpenter was described as 'of Henry Farman type with Paterson section'.
The machine built in England was a typical pusher of the time, with front elevator and fixed tailplane carried on booms, parallel in plan and tapering in side view. The rudder made of aluminum sheet was cut away at the center to clear the tailplane. The wings were double surfaced and of equal span and carried single acting ailerons on all four. A nacelle enclosed the two occupants, seated in tandem, with fuel and oil tanks behind. The propeller was mounted in front of the rotary engine.
In the early part of 1913, Paterson fitted floats to one of his machines, which also had top wing extensions and this was the first seaplane in South Africa. On both the seaplane, and when operating on wheels, the nacelle was removed to reduce weight to aid the performance in the heat of South Africa.
There are shadowy references to a further Paterson aeroplane having been built in October 1913 by Lawtons Ltd., 25 Hope St., Liverpool, but this cannot be confirmed.
Paterson returned to England in 1914 and formed a partnership with Capt. E. Bass to build the Bass-Paterson flying boat, constructed by S.E. Saunders Ltd. at Cowes (q.v.).
Paterson is well remembered for his work in training the first pilots of the SAAF and a memorial hangar was built in 1981 on the original site, where this took place, housing a replica of Paterson's second aircraft. A road near Kimberley Airport was also named after him in 1987.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 32ft without extensions
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5ft 3in
Area 329 sq. ft
Area tailplane 24 sq. ft
Area elevator 311/2 sq. ft
Area rudder 8 1/2 sq. ft
Length 32ft 9in
Weight 750 lb.
Height 10ft 4in
In the spring of 1911 Paterson left Liverpool to become an instructor for the Grahame-White School at Hendon, remaining there till late in the year, during which time he designed a new aircraft, which he planned to take to South Africa. This time the machine was constructed by Lawton's Motor Body Works, Cricklewood London NW. Paterson flew the machine for the first time from a field near the Welsh Harp on 18 October 1911, with some damage occurring, when he was forced to land in a restricted space with a blocked fuel pipe.
The machine was soon repaired, but it seems unlikely that it reached Brooklands when ready, as reported to be Paterson's intention. Time was short before the machine was to be packed for shipment on the SS Garth Castle on 11 November 1911. Paterson's team in the African Aviation Syndicate consisted of his assistant pilot, E.F Driver, manager Guy Livingston and several mechanics. Apart from having the Bleriot agency for Africa, the object was to interest the government and public in aviation, and to set up a flying school.
The party arrived at Cape Town in early December and gave demonstrations straight away, but Paterson crashed on 26 December 1911, when the fabric on the tail split open and he suffered injuries. The early problem overcome, Paterson and Driver flew considerable distances to give demonstrations, using the biplane, Driver's Bleriot, and a Farman built earlier by John Weston at Brandfoort in the Orange Free State.
In March 1912 Driver crashed the Bleriot badly, although it was later rebuilt, but by September the African Aviation Syndicate was in liquidation. However, Paterson acquired the assets and persuaded local business men to finance a new scheme, the Paterson Aviation Syndicate, for which he obtained a contract from the government to train ten military pilots, beginning in September 1913. For this he required a new instructor and E.W. Cheeseman late of the Grahame-White school, came out, but he crashed and was killed on 13 October 1913. At that time there were two Paterson biplanes in use at Alexandersfontein, near Kimberley; the second biplane, built by Mr. H. Carpenter was described as 'of Henry Farman type with Paterson section'.
The machine built in England was a typical pusher of the time, with front elevator and fixed tailplane carried on booms, parallel in plan and tapering in side view. The rudder made of aluminum sheet was cut away at the center to clear the tailplane. The wings were double surfaced and of equal span and carried single acting ailerons on all four. A nacelle enclosed the two occupants, seated in tandem, with fuel and oil tanks behind. The propeller was mounted in front of the rotary engine.
In the early part of 1913, Paterson fitted floats to one of his machines, which also had top wing extensions and this was the first seaplane in South Africa. On both the seaplane, and when operating on wheels, the nacelle was removed to reduce weight to aid the performance in the heat of South Africa.
There are shadowy references to a further Paterson aeroplane having been built in October 1913 by Lawtons Ltd., 25 Hope St., Liverpool, but this cannot be confirmed.
Paterson returned to England in 1914 and formed a partnership with Capt. E. Bass to build the Bass-Paterson flying boat, constructed by S.E. Saunders Ltd. at Cowes (q.v.).
Paterson is well remembered for his work in training the first pilots of the SAAF and a memorial hangar was built in 1981 on the original site, where this took place, housing a replica of Paterson's second aircraft. A road near Kimberley Airport was also named after him in 1987.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 32ft without extensions
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 5ft 3in
Area 329 sq. ft
Area tailplane 24 sq. ft
Area elevator 311/2 sq. ft
Area rudder 8 1/2 sq. ft
Length 32ft 9in
Weight 750 lb.
Height 10ft 4in
Paterson biplane No.2 was built at Cricklewood by Lawtons Motor Body Works in 1911 and soon dispatched to South Africa.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PEMBERTON BILLING aircraft (Noel Pemberton Billing)
Pemberton Billing's early activities in aviation began in 1903-1904 with a manlifting kite or glider (PB.0). He then built three variations of a small monoplane, one using a rotary motor of his own design (PB.l). On the second of these he lifted off the ground in 1909, but crashed and was injured.
In 1909 Billing was responsible for the abortive attempt to create an aerodrome, with factory and support facilities, at Fambridge in Essex. This was a failure owing to the nature of the ground and its remoteness. Later, apart from editing a magazine, he turned his activities back to boats, for which he had facilities at Woolston, Southampton from 1912. Late in 1913 he again turned to aeronautical, work with the design of a small flying boat PB.l (PB.7) using the name Supermarine for the first time.
Following the lack of success of this and other types, and little official interest, he gradually gave up his interest in the company, the responsibility for which was taken over by his works manager, Hubert Scott Paine, as the Supermarine Aviation Works Ltd. in 1916.
The identification of Pemberton Billing types is confused by the renumbering that took place retrospectively; the bracketed number is the later identity.
PEMBERTON BILLING glider (PB.0)
This was a triangular kite on which PB tried to glide from the roof of his house at East Grinstead in 1904.
Pemberton Billing's early activities in aviation began in 1903-1904 with a manlifting kite or glider (PB.0). He then built three variations of a small monoplane, one using a rotary motor of his own design (PB.l). On the second of these he lifted off the ground in 1909, but crashed and was injured.
In 1909 Billing was responsible for the abortive attempt to create an aerodrome, with factory and support facilities, at Fambridge in Essex. This was a failure owing to the nature of the ground and its remoteness. Later, apart from editing a magazine, he turned his activities back to boats, for which he had facilities at Woolston, Southampton from 1912. Late in 1913 he again turned to aeronautical, work with the design of a small flying boat PB.l (PB.7) using the name Supermarine for the first time.
Following the lack of success of this and other types, and little official interest, he gradually gave up his interest in the company, the responsibility for which was taken over by his works manager, Hubert Scott Paine, as the Supermarine Aviation Works Ltd. in 1916.
The identification of Pemberton Billing types is confused by the renumbering that took place retrospectively; the bracketed number is the later identity.
PEMBERTON BILLING glider (PB.0)
This was a triangular kite on which PB tried to glide from the roof of his house at East Grinstead in 1904.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PEMBERTON BILLING monoplane (PB.1 and 3) (Woolston & Park Royal)
The machine was a small pusher, based on a tubular chassis on a tricycle undercarriage, tested unsuccessfully at Woolston in 1909.
The wings were extended aft at their inboard ends, terminating in flaps for lateral and directional control. On the second version the pilot was enclosed in a nacelle. It was the second version that lifted off briefly on several occasions, finishing with a jump of 60ft and a crash which injured PB.
Power:
PB.1 Pemberton Billing valveless rotary
PB.3 JAP two-cylinder air-cooled
PEMBERTON BILLING monoplane (PB.5)
This was similar to PB.3 with the addition of a front elevator. It was not flown, but was sold to pay debts, while PB was recovering from his injuries.
Power: 25-40hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke.
The machine was a small pusher, based on a tubular chassis on a tricycle undercarriage, tested unsuccessfully at Woolston in 1909.
The wings were extended aft at their inboard ends, terminating in flaps for lateral and directional control. On the second version the pilot was enclosed in a nacelle. It was the second version that lifted off briefly on several occasions, finishing with a jump of 60ft and a crash which injured PB.
Power:
PB.1 Pemberton Billing valveless rotary
PB.3 JAP two-cylinder air-cooled
PEMBERTON BILLING monoplane (PB.5)
This was similar to PB.3 with the addition of a front elevator. It was not flown, but was sold to pay debts, while PB was recovering from his injuries.
Power: 25-40hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PEMBERTON BILLING flying boat Supermarine PB.l (PB.7 and 9)
This small single-seater flying boat was displayed at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1914 and was tested later with little success. The machine was broken up later in the year after an altered layout had been tried.
The PB.l had a well shaped, circular section hull with an added lower section, with flared sides, ending in a step. The pilot was seated behind the wings, with the engine in a nacelle on struts ahead of the wings, mounted at a steep thrust angle. The wings were of unequal span and were made in one piece, without dihedral. Sprung, streamlined, circular section floats were mounted below the outboard interplane struts. Ailerons and conventional tail surfaces were fitted. An instrument named a 'Supermeter', to register the height above the water on alighting, was a special feature. A grapnel in the nose, controlled from the cockpit, was another original fitment.
After unsuccessful attempts to takeoff, the engine and pilot's position were interchanged. The engine was buried in the hull and drove twin pusher propellers by chain drives. The pilot was positioned ahead of the wings to balance the aircraft. In this form the machine was tested in May 1914 by Howard Pixton and was later identified as PB.9.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft diameter three-bladed PB Trinity propeller, replaced by twin chain driven outboard propellers
Data
Span top 30ft
Span bottom 28ft
Chord 5ft 7 l/2in
Gap 5ft 3in
Area 293 sq. ft
Area elevator 20 sq. ft
Area rudder 12 sq. ft
Area tailplane 31 sq. ft
Weight 750 lb.
Price .525
Weight allup 970 lb.
This small single-seater flying boat was displayed at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1914 and was tested later with little success. The machine was broken up later in the year after an altered layout had been tried.
The PB.l had a well shaped, circular section hull with an added lower section, with flared sides, ending in a step. The pilot was seated behind the wings, with the engine in a nacelle on struts ahead of the wings, mounted at a steep thrust angle. The wings were of unequal span and were made in one piece, without dihedral. Sprung, streamlined, circular section floats were mounted below the outboard interplane struts. Ailerons and conventional tail surfaces were fitted. An instrument named a 'Supermeter', to register the height above the water on alighting, was a special feature. A grapnel in the nose, controlled from the cockpit, was another original fitment.
After unsuccessful attempts to takeoff, the engine and pilot's position were interchanged. The engine was buried in the hull and drove twin pusher propellers by chain drives. The pilot was positioned ahead of the wings to balance the aircraft. In this form the machine was tested in May 1914 by Howard Pixton and was later identified as PB.9.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft diameter three-bladed PB Trinity propeller, replaced by twin chain driven outboard propellers
Data
Span top 30ft
Span bottom 28ft
Chord 5ft 7 l/2in
Gap 5ft 3in
Area 293 sq. ft
Area elevator 20 sq. ft
Area rudder 12 sq. ft
Area tailplane 31 sq. ft
Weight 750 lb.
Price .525
Weight allup 970 lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PEMBERTON BILLING flying boat Supermarine PB.2 (PB.11)
This project, which remained unbuilt, was to have the engine installed in the hull, driving the propeller through bevel gearboxes and shafts, at a high thrust angle. The hull design was an enlarged version of PB. 1, with the lower hull portion extended further aft. The pilot sat in the rear cockpit; the front cockpit, under the wing, was larger and could probably hold more than one passenger. The monoplane wing was mounted above the hull on struts, and was braced to the hull by narrow chord aerofoils. The balancing floats, mounted under the aerofoil struts, were sprung by a scissors-like system of struts, passing on either side of the aerofoil struts, to attach to the main wing.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 9ft diameter three-bladed PB Trinity propeller
Data
Weight allup 2,000lb.
Price .1575
PEMBERTON BILLING flying boat Supermarine PB.3
This was a further enlargement of PB.2 which remained unbuilt. This time wing warping was employed. The machine was to have two engines driving a propeller through bevel gearboxes and shafts as before. In his elaborate publicity material, produced for issue at the Aero Show, PB refers to 'alternate drive', which is presumably for a water propeller, and perhaps the first intended 'slip wing' machine.
Power: Two 90hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 9ft 6in diameter three-bladed PB Trinity propeller
Data
Weight allup 3,000lb.
Price .2310
PEMBERTON BILLING flying lifeboat, Supermarine PB.5 (PB.21) and PB.7 (PB.19)
The first version of this 'slip wing' design was not built, but two of the PB.7 type were ordered by the German Navy and construction of these was commenced in May 1914. The machine was illustrated and details given in advertisements dating from 29 May 1914.
The design consisted of a biplane with engine in the hull, driving twin pusher propellers by chain. The hull was designed as a motor boat, with water propeller and rudder, to which the rear portion of the hull, and complete wing cellule, were attached as one unit. One of the German machines was basically complete by the end of July, but further work was discontinued at the outbreak of war. The boat portion is believed to have been finished and used later on the Solent.
Power: PB.7 200hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) fourteen-cylinder water-cooled radial or 225hp Sunbeam twelve-cylinder water-cooled vee
Data
Span 57ft 6in
Length 34ft
Endurance 4hr
Weight allup 3,000lb.
Speed 45-70 mph
The boat portion had a speed of 35 knots and a range of 200 miles maximum
This project, which remained unbuilt, was to have the engine installed in the hull, driving the propeller through bevel gearboxes and shafts, at a high thrust angle. The hull design was an enlarged version of PB. 1, with the lower hull portion extended further aft. The pilot sat in the rear cockpit; the front cockpit, under the wing, was larger and could probably hold more than one passenger. The monoplane wing was mounted above the hull on struts, and was braced to the hull by narrow chord aerofoils. The balancing floats, mounted under the aerofoil struts, were sprung by a scissors-like system of struts, passing on either side of the aerofoil struts, to attach to the main wing.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 9ft diameter three-bladed PB Trinity propeller
Data
Weight allup 2,000lb.
Price .1575
PEMBERTON BILLING flying boat Supermarine PB.3
This was a further enlargement of PB.2 which remained unbuilt. This time wing warping was employed. The machine was to have two engines driving a propeller through bevel gearboxes and shafts as before. In his elaborate publicity material, produced for issue at the Aero Show, PB refers to 'alternate drive', which is presumably for a water propeller, and perhaps the first intended 'slip wing' machine.
Power: Two 90hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a 9ft 6in diameter three-bladed PB Trinity propeller
Data
Weight allup 3,000lb.
Price .2310
PEMBERTON BILLING flying lifeboat, Supermarine PB.5 (PB.21) and PB.7 (PB.19)
The first version of this 'slip wing' design was not built, but two of the PB.7 type were ordered by the German Navy and construction of these was commenced in May 1914. The machine was illustrated and details given in advertisements dating from 29 May 1914.
The design consisted of a biplane with engine in the hull, driving twin pusher propellers by chain. The hull was designed as a motor boat, with water propeller and rudder, to which the rear portion of the hull, and complete wing cellule, were attached as one unit. One of the German machines was basically complete by the end of July, but further work was discontinued at the outbreak of war. The boat portion is believed to have been finished and used later on the Solent.
Power: PB.7 200hp Salmson (Canton-Unne) fourteen-cylinder water-cooled radial or 225hp Sunbeam twelve-cylinder water-cooled vee
Data
Span 57ft 6in
Length 34ft
Endurance 4hr
Weight allup 3,000lb.
Speed 45-70 mph
The boat portion had a speed of 35 knots and a range of 200 miles maximum
Flying lifeboats PB5 and 7 later renamed PB21 and 19 respectively with slipwing allowing the hull to proceed separately. One was basically complete in July 1914.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PEMBERTON BILLING biplane PB.9 (PB.13)
This scout type biplane was constructed in August 1914 at the time of the outbreak of war. It was produced in a hurry, on an initiative by Billing, and became known as 'the Seven Day Bus', from its construction between the 3rd and 11th of August. On the 12th, it was taken to a field at Netley, where after repair of damage caused while taxiing, it was flown by Victor Mahl of Sopwith's. Thereafter it was transferred to Brooklands, where it was flown by Jack Alcock, who refused to fly it again after two flights. Billing then attempted to take off himself, but damaged the undercarriage before becoming airborne.
The machine was taken over by the RNAS in early 1915 and became serial No. 1267 at Hendon and Chingford, until struck off charge in June. Billing acquired the discarded PB.9 and used it to further his unsuccessful election campaign of early 1916.
The machine was comparable to other scout biplanes of the period, such as the Sopwith Tabloid and Martinsyde S.l, but it had nothing to commend it for general use, so was not ordered in quantity. A proposed enlarged version with staggered wings (PB. 17) was not built.
One feature, which was unusual, was the construction of the complete wing assembly in one unit, which was passed over the tail to its correct position, where it was then clamped to the longerons. This feature may have stemmed from an original set of wings, bought by Billing from Radley, made for the Radley-England pusher biplane, which was not completed.
The engine was the Gnome originally used in the Farman, on which Billing had learnt to fly in 1913, and was also used in the PB. 1 flying boat, which had been discarded by this time.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 4ft 6in
Gap 4ft 6in
Area 205 sq. ft
Area tailplane 13 sq. ft
Area elevators 11 sq. ft
Area fin 2 sq. ft
Area rudder 6 sq. ft
Weight 560 lb.
Weight allup 750 lb.
Length 20 ft
Speed range 40-75 mph
Endurance 3hr
This scout type biplane was constructed in August 1914 at the time of the outbreak of war. It was produced in a hurry, on an initiative by Billing, and became known as 'the Seven Day Bus', from its construction between the 3rd and 11th of August. On the 12th, it was taken to a field at Netley, where after repair of damage caused while taxiing, it was flown by Victor Mahl of Sopwith's. Thereafter it was transferred to Brooklands, where it was flown by Jack Alcock, who refused to fly it again after two flights. Billing then attempted to take off himself, but damaged the undercarriage before becoming airborne.
The machine was taken over by the RNAS in early 1915 and became serial No. 1267 at Hendon and Chingford, until struck off charge in June. Billing acquired the discarded PB.9 and used it to further his unsuccessful election campaign of early 1916.
The machine was comparable to other scout biplanes of the period, such as the Sopwith Tabloid and Martinsyde S.l, but it had nothing to commend it for general use, so was not ordered in quantity. A proposed enlarged version with staggered wings (PB. 17) was not built.
One feature, which was unusual, was the construction of the complete wing assembly in one unit, which was passed over the tail to its correct position, where it was then clamped to the longerons. This feature may have stemmed from an original set of wings, bought by Billing from Radley, made for the Radley-England pusher biplane, which was not completed.
The engine was the Gnome originally used in the Farman, on which Billing had learnt to fly in 1913, and was also used in the PB. 1 flying boat, which had been discarded by this time.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 8ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 26ft
Chord 4ft 6in
Gap 4ft 6in
Area 205 sq. ft
Area tailplane 13 sq. ft
Area elevators 11 sq. ft
Area fin 2 sq. ft
Area rudder 6 sq. ft
Weight 560 lb.
Weight allup 750 lb.
Length 20 ft
Speed range 40-75 mph
Endurance 3hr
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PEMBERTON BILLING biplane PB.11 (PB.15)
Serial No. 1374, which the RNAS acquired in February 1915, was a pusher 'Gun Bus' type with a Gnome engine. This was probably no more than the Farman III, which Billing had purchased in order to learn to fly in twenty-four hours on 17 September 1913, to win a wager with Handley Page, although this machine did not have an enclosed nacelle.
Serial No. 1374, which the RNAS acquired in February 1915, was a pusher 'Gun Bus' type with a Gnome engine. This was probably no more than the Farman III, which Billing had purchased in order to learn to fly in twenty-four hours on 17 September 1913, to win a wager with Handley Page, although this machine did not have an enclosed nacelle.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PERCIVAL Parseval I biplane (N.S. Percival, Hangar No.2, Brooklands)
This machine was a further reconstruction of the biplane built by Eardley Billing, which was itself a reconstruction of a Voisin. During early trials it was reported to be difficult to fly, attributed to the replacement of the ailerons with warping control, and the fact that the fore and aft balance was incorrect. The latter defect was corrected by moving the fuselage by four inches in relation to the wings.
The machine was flown by Percival from the 16 August 1911 and, despite odd damage occurring, was successfully used for instructional work until April, when more extensive damage took place. In August the machine reappeared, after repair, fitted with the new Adams-Dorman engine for flight testing. This engine failed to attract interest and by October Percival had transferred his interest to a Caudron and later to the Dunne tailless aircraft.
Power:
40hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee
60-80hp Adams-Dorman eight-cylinder water-cooled vee from August 1912
This machine was a further reconstruction of the biplane built by Eardley Billing, which was itself a reconstruction of a Voisin. During early trials it was reported to be difficult to fly, attributed to the replacement of the ailerons with warping control, and the fact that the fore and aft balance was incorrect. The latter defect was corrected by moving the fuselage by four inches in relation to the wings.
The machine was flown by Percival from the 16 August 1911 and, despite odd damage occurring, was successfully used for instructional work until April, when more extensive damage took place. In August the machine reappeared, after repair, fitted with the new Adams-Dorman engine for flight testing. This engine failed to attract interest and by October Percival had transferred his interest to a Caudron and later to the Dunne tailless aircraft.
Power:
40hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee
60-80hp Adams-Dorman eight-cylinder water-cooled vee from August 1912
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PERRY, BEADLE biplane 1913 type T.l (Perry, Beadle & Co., Aviation Works, Gould Rd., Twickenham, Middlesex)
The first result of collaboration by E.W. Copland Perry, a qualified pilot, and F.P. Hyde Beadle, a technician, who had met at the RAF Farnborough in 19112, was a small single-seater biplane built at Beaulieu in 1913. The machine apparently flew well at Beaulieu, making at least one flight to Cowes. It was described by C.G. Grey as being on 'Avro cum BE lines' but no description appeared.
However in 1914, after Perry, Beadle & Co. was formed, a catalogue was issued with a photograph showing an aircraft conforming to this description. The associated data refers to a developed version of this machine, Type T.2, with a six-cylinder radial Anzani, but this is probably applicable, in part, to the 1913 type.
The illustration shows an equal span biplane with a three-cylinder Y type engine and fuselage mounted with a gap between it and the lower wing. A twin skid undercarriage with wheels sprung on the skids was shown. Parallel ailerons were fitted to the top wing only.
Power: 25hp Anzani three-cylinder Y type air-cooled semiradial
Data
Span 25ft
Gap c.5ft 9in
Chord 4ft 6in
Area c.225 sq. Ft
PERRY, BEADLE biplane 1914 type T.2
The biplane, which arrived at Brooklands in May 1914, revealed differences from the earlier version. The fuselage now rested on the lower wing, the gap having been reduced. There was a large cutout in the trailing edge of the lower wing, below the fuselage. The top wing had been extended, and there was taper on the trailing edge of the ailerons, and bracing struts to support the extensions had been added. The undercarriage was of simple vee type with cross axle and no skids. The engine was a six-cylinder radial.
Copland Perry flew the aircraft on 26 June 1914 and later M.F Glew and A. Dukinfield Jones also. It was requisitioned by the RNAS later in the year, becoming serial No. 1322, and was wrecked at Hendon in March 1915.
Power: 45hp Anzani six-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span top c.35ft
Span bottom 25ft
Chord 4ft 6in
Gap 4ft 9in
Area c.270 sq. ft
Climb rate 400 ft per min
Speed range 45-65 mph
Endurance 2hr
Price .450
PERRY, BEADLE biplane type P.6
This project was to meet a military specification for 'Reconnaissance Type B', for which the following information appeared in the 1914 catalogue.
The aircraft was to be a pusher biplane, with a two wheeled undercarriage and skids and double acting ailerons. Ccommodation was provided for a crew of three.
Power: 100-110hp Anzani ten-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span 38ft
Chord 6ft
Area 450 sq. ft
Area tailplane 58 sq. ft
Area elevators 30 sq. ft
Area rudders 18 sq. ft
Weight 1,000lb.
Speed range 34-63mph
Climb rate 380ft per min
Endurance 4hr
The first result of collaboration by E.W. Copland Perry, a qualified pilot, and F.P. Hyde Beadle, a technician, who had met at the RAF Farnborough in 19112, was a small single-seater biplane built at Beaulieu in 1913. The machine apparently flew well at Beaulieu, making at least one flight to Cowes. It was described by C.G. Grey as being on 'Avro cum BE lines' but no description appeared.
However in 1914, after Perry, Beadle & Co. was formed, a catalogue was issued with a photograph showing an aircraft conforming to this description. The associated data refers to a developed version of this machine, Type T.2, with a six-cylinder radial Anzani, but this is probably applicable, in part, to the 1913 type.
The illustration shows an equal span biplane with a three-cylinder Y type engine and fuselage mounted with a gap between it and the lower wing. A twin skid undercarriage with wheels sprung on the skids was shown. Parallel ailerons were fitted to the top wing only.
Power: 25hp Anzani three-cylinder Y type air-cooled semiradial
Data
Span 25ft
Gap c.5ft 9in
Chord 4ft 6in
Area c.225 sq. Ft
PERRY, BEADLE biplane 1914 type T.2
The biplane, which arrived at Brooklands in May 1914, revealed differences from the earlier version. The fuselage now rested on the lower wing, the gap having been reduced. There was a large cutout in the trailing edge of the lower wing, below the fuselage. The top wing had been extended, and there was taper on the trailing edge of the ailerons, and bracing struts to support the extensions had been added. The undercarriage was of simple vee type with cross axle and no skids. The engine was a six-cylinder radial.
Copland Perry flew the aircraft on 26 June 1914 and later M.F Glew and A. Dukinfield Jones also. It was requisitioned by the RNAS later in the year, becoming serial No. 1322, and was wrecked at Hendon in March 1915.
Power: 45hp Anzani six-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span top c.35ft
Span bottom 25ft
Chord 4ft 6in
Gap 4ft 9in
Area c.270 sq. ft
Climb rate 400 ft per min
Speed range 45-65 mph
Endurance 2hr
Price .450
PERRY, BEADLE biplane type P.6
This project was to meet a military specification for 'Reconnaissance Type B', for which the following information appeared in the 1914 catalogue.
The aircraft was to be a pusher biplane, with a two wheeled undercarriage and skids and double acting ailerons. Ccommodation was provided for a crew of three.
Power: 100-110hp Anzani ten-cylinder air-cooled radial
Data
Span 38ft
Chord 6ft
Area 450 sq. ft
Area tailplane 58 sq. ft
Area elevators 30 sq. ft
Area rudders 18 sq. ft
Weight 1,000lb.
Speed range 34-63mph
Climb rate 380ft per min
Endurance 4hr
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PERRY, BEADLE flying boat type B.3
This biplane flying boat appeared for the first time at Olympia, incomplete, in March 1914, where it received praise for the quality of its workmanship. Much of this was the work of S.E. Saunders Ltd. of Cowes, who had designed the hull shape, and built it using the patented 'Consuta' system of copper wire sewn plywood. The lower wing was surfaced with 'Consuta' also and was made buoyant. The fin and tailplane were integral with the hull. The use of the lower wings as sponsons was covered by patent No.4634/1914.
The engine was mounted in the nose under a detachable cowling and drove, by means of an extension shaft and chains, the twin tractor propellers. These were mounted in streamlined housings and were supported between the planes by the intermediate interplane struts and bracing wires. Behind this, a single open cockpit, in the rounded top decking, housed the passenger in front and the pilot behind. The radiator was fitted high up across the inboard interplane struts.
The top wing carried inset ailerons in the overhanging portion. The other control surfaces consisted of a divided elevator and a rudder, the lower portion of which was immersed when the machine was at rest, to serve as a water rudder. The immersed tail surfaces were also covered with 'Consuta' ply.
After the Aero Show the machine was assembled in Saunders' Columbine Works and, soon after, the visiting impressment officer recorded it as a potential machine for Service use, by which time the ENV engine had been replaced by a 90hp Curtiss. The extent of the testing carried out at Cowes is not clear, but in August the machine was moved to the Eastbourne Aviation Co. Perry had been killed in an air crash on 16 August 1914 in France and the company was being closed down. Later the aircraft was sold to the Lakes Flying Co. and tests were carried out on Lake Windermere until July 1915, without flight being achieved. The aircraft was then broken up.
Power:
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving two Integral propellers through an extension shaft and chains, one crossed for opposite rotation.
90hp Curtiss type OX eight-cylinder water-cooled vee substituted in mid-1914
Data
Span top 35ft
Span bottom 23ft 3in
Chord top 6ft
Chord bottom 4ft
Gap 6ft 8 l/2in
Area 290 sq. ft
Area rudder 11 sq. ft
Area elevators 6 sq. ft
Area tailplane 25 sq. ft
Weight 1,100lb.
Speed 72 mph
Endurance 3 1/2hr
Weight allup 1,600lb.
This biplane flying boat appeared for the first time at Olympia, incomplete, in March 1914, where it received praise for the quality of its workmanship. Much of this was the work of S.E. Saunders Ltd. of Cowes, who had designed the hull shape, and built it using the patented 'Consuta' system of copper wire sewn plywood. The lower wing was surfaced with 'Consuta' also and was made buoyant. The fin and tailplane were integral with the hull. The use of the lower wings as sponsons was covered by patent No.4634/1914.
The engine was mounted in the nose under a detachable cowling and drove, by means of an extension shaft and chains, the twin tractor propellers. These were mounted in streamlined housings and were supported between the planes by the intermediate interplane struts and bracing wires. Behind this, a single open cockpit, in the rounded top decking, housed the passenger in front and the pilot behind. The radiator was fitted high up across the inboard interplane struts.
The top wing carried inset ailerons in the overhanging portion. The other control surfaces consisted of a divided elevator and a rudder, the lower portion of which was immersed when the machine was at rest, to serve as a water rudder. The immersed tail surfaces were also covered with 'Consuta' ply.
After the Aero Show the machine was assembled in Saunders' Columbine Works and, soon after, the visiting impressment officer recorded it as a potential machine for Service use, by which time the ENV engine had been replaced by a 90hp Curtiss. The extent of the testing carried out at Cowes is not clear, but in August the machine was moved to the Eastbourne Aviation Co. Perry had been killed in an air crash on 16 August 1914 in France and the company was being closed down. Later the aircraft was sold to the Lakes Flying Co. and tests were carried out on Lake Windermere until July 1915, without flight being achieved. The aircraft was then broken up.
Power:
60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving two Integral propellers through an extension shaft and chains, one crossed for opposite rotation.
90hp Curtiss type OX eight-cylinder water-cooled vee substituted in mid-1914
Data
Span top 35ft
Span bottom 23ft 3in
Chord top 6ft
Chord bottom 4ft
Gap 6ft 8 l/2in
Area 290 sq. ft
Area rudder 11 sq. ft
Area elevators 6 sq. ft
Area tailplane 25 sq. ft
Weight 1,100lb.
Speed 72 mph
Endurance 3 1/2hr
Weight allup 1,600lb.
Perry Beadle B3 flying boat in the works of SE Saunders Ltd. at Cowes where it was constructed in 1914.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PETRE monoplane (Henry A. Petre and Edward Petre, Brooklands, Hangar No.ll)
The brothers designed and constructed this machine in 1909-1910 and it was shown in skeleton form on the stand of Leo Ripault Ltd. at Olympia in March 1910. The aircraft was taken to Brooklands for completion and testing and was housed in hangar No.11.
On the 26 July 1910 Henry Petre was airborne 23ft. above the ground, but, after flying about 100 yards, a gust of wind caused the machine to crash on the port wing. It was not rebuilt and the brothers went on to fly other people's aircraft. Edward was killed on a Martinsyde on 24 December 1912, but Henry went to Australia, that same month, to train the first military pilots at Point Cook and continued to serve in the Australian Flying Corps and its successor service, the RAAF.
The layout of the monoplane was unusual in that the propeller was behind the tail, driven by a long shaft from the engine mounted in the central position, with the pilot positioned ahead of the wing in the nose. The wing was built in two halves and could be rotated about the main spar to vary the angle of incidence in flight.
The fuselage, which was split at the center to assist transport, was built with four longerons, vertical members and diagonal cross bracing, mainly of laminated ash. The top longerons were set wider apart than the lower pair and tapered towards the tail. The aircraft rested almost horizontally on the ground by virtue of the tall tail wheel mounting, a consequence of the incidence changing feature.
The main undercarriage consisted of two A-frames with twin skids and sprung cross axle. The control surfaces consisted of ailerons with diagonal hinge lines, their outline extending behind the main trailing edge shape. The all moving tail surface was mounted above the fuselage on a structure braced to the tail wheel support and provided lift as well as control in pitch. A small rudder was positioned below the fuselage. The two radiators for cooling the NEC engine were located on the fuselage sides alongside the cockpit.
Power: 25-35hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke driving a 7ft diameter Handley Page propeller through a 15ft long 2in diameter shaft.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 7ft
Area 195 sq. ft
Area tailplane 36 sq. ft
Area rudder 7 sq. ft
Length 29ft
Weight 540 lb.
Weight allup 740 lb.
Speed 30mph
Price .800
The brothers designed and constructed this machine in 1909-1910 and it was shown in skeleton form on the stand of Leo Ripault Ltd. at Olympia in March 1910. The aircraft was taken to Brooklands for completion and testing and was housed in hangar No.11.
On the 26 July 1910 Henry Petre was airborne 23ft. above the ground, but, after flying about 100 yards, a gust of wind caused the machine to crash on the port wing. It was not rebuilt and the brothers went on to fly other people's aircraft. Edward was killed on a Martinsyde on 24 December 1912, but Henry went to Australia, that same month, to train the first military pilots at Point Cook and continued to serve in the Australian Flying Corps and its successor service, the RAAF.
The layout of the monoplane was unusual in that the propeller was behind the tail, driven by a long shaft from the engine mounted in the central position, with the pilot positioned ahead of the wing in the nose. The wing was built in two halves and could be rotated about the main spar to vary the angle of incidence in flight.
The fuselage, which was split at the center to assist transport, was built with four longerons, vertical members and diagonal cross bracing, mainly of laminated ash. The top longerons were set wider apart than the lower pair and tapered towards the tail. The aircraft rested almost horizontally on the ground by virtue of the tall tail wheel mounting, a consequence of the incidence changing feature.
The main undercarriage consisted of two A-frames with twin skids and sprung cross axle. The control surfaces consisted of ailerons with diagonal hinge lines, their outline extending behind the main trailing edge shape. The all moving tail surface was mounted above the fuselage on a structure braced to the tail wheel support and provided lift as well as control in pitch. A small rudder was positioned below the fuselage. The two radiators for cooling the NEC engine were located on the fuselage sides alongside the cockpit.
Power: 25-35hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke driving a 7ft diameter Handley Page propeller through a 15ft long 2in diameter shaft.
Data
Span 30ft
Chord 7ft
Area 195 sq. ft
Area tailplane 36 sq. ft
Area rudder 7 sq. ft
Length 29ft
Weight 540 lb.
Weight allup 740 lb.
Speed 30mph
Price .800
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PHILLIPS helicopters and multi-planes (Horatio Frederick Phillips, Norwood, Harrow, Southminster, Streatham etc.)
Phillips, born 1845, was an inventor who began experimental aeronautical work with models, including making experiments with various forms of propulsion, aiming at a lightweight engine for flight purposes. His particular contribution was his work on aerofoil sections, from which the term 'Phillips Entry' is still used as a description and which were the subject of Patent Nos.13768/1884 and 13311/1891. His experimental equipment included a large steam powered Whirling Arm and a Circular Track as part of his costly experiments.
He aimed initially to develop direct lift types, i.e. helicopters, but lacking success with these, turned to gliders and models. His experience with the use of flexible fabric covering led him to decide to use solid 'sustainers', i.e. aerofoils, and he used examples of these, ranging in chord from 1.5 to 24 inches in the course of his trials. The nature of these narrow sections led to the design of 'Multi-planes' with many individual aerofoils in supporting frames. Several were built before a limited degree of success was achieved. His Patent No.20435/1890 covered machines with two or more frames.
Phillips carried out aeronautical experiments from about 1864 until 1910. Some of his early work was facilitated by his position as works manager, from 1890 to 1902, of the factory at Harrow of gun makers Cogswell and Harrison Ltd. This position, and their mutual interests, brought him into contact with Hiram Maxim. Support was also provided in 1893-1894 by the Comte de Lambert, but this was withdrawn owing to problems arising as a result of Phillips drinking habits. After retirement from business in 1902, Phillips devoted his time to experimental aeronautics and later to work as a motor and general mechanical engineer, with premises at West Barnham, Sussex. He died in 1926.
PHILLIPS helicopters and monoplane
In about 1870, a direct lift machine was constructed at Battersea, south London, in one of the railway arches. This was powered by a steam engine, of Phillips' own design, and drove contrarotating steel rotors, later replaced by 20ft diameter wooden rotors. No success was achieved during tests in Battersea Fields. In 1903, with his son A.H. Phillips, he was again testing direct lift machines at the Crystal Palace, but again without success. One of these had 33ft diameter contra-rotating rotors driven by a 15 hp petrol engine.
At this time Phillips also built a petrol engined monoplane on floats, which was launched on the Thames from Messengers Island, Surbiton with his son in control. The first trial was stopped when the port wing lifted 56ft and the machine, banking steeply, was at risk as it rounded the bend in the river towards Hampton Court. The trials were discontinued after the propeller broke and were not resumed.
In 1904, at Furzle Down Farm, Mitcham a machine with a more powerful motor driving two 20ft diameter rotors, set at nine degrees from the vertical, on the ends of a girder, was also tried. The tilt was to create some forward motion to aid takeoff, but as with previous machines, this was a complete failure. Phillips returned to direct lift machines in the autumn of 1909, when a new machine gave promising results and encouraged him to again pursue the principle, which he regarded as the practical flying machine of the future, particularly in England with its small fields and open spaces.
PHILLIPS multi-planes
Phillips pursued his aeronautical work with models after his early disappointments with rotary wings. Using models weighing up to 20 lb., which were shot from a catapult, he then constructed at Norwood a circular concrete track of 500ft circumference, 160ft diameter approximately, and tethered his machine to the center. First he used a full size type of box-kite with fabric covering, but soon decided on the use of more rigid aerofoils. This work led to the patents of 1884 and 1891 and the favoring of solid narrow aerofoils and the multi-plane type aircraft. To assess the best form for the blades, he proposed to use a steam driven whirling arm machine traversing a circumference of 323ft, 103ft diameter, to test them.
PHILLIPS multi-plane No.l 1893
Resulting from the work on the whirling arm and other tests, Phillips constructed a large unmanned multi-plane, with fifty aerofoils in a frame, mounted on a body on three wheels, with the single wheel at the front and was propelled by a compound steam engine driving a two-bladed tractor propeller. Phillips was sponsored by the Comte de Lambert at this time, which resulted in this engine being sold by the Count to the Musee de 1'Air in 1936.
The machine was tested on a circular track at Harrow, 628ft. in circumference, 200ft diameter, anchored to a central post, where it lifted itself and a 56 lb. load, a total of 416 lb., about 2ft in 1893.
Power: 6hp Phillips compound steam engine driving a two-bladed tractor propeller
Data
Span 22ft
Chord of slats 1 1/2 in
Area 136 sq. ft
Length 20ft
Height 9ft 6in
Weight 360 lb.
Phillips, born 1845, was an inventor who began experimental aeronautical work with models, including making experiments with various forms of propulsion, aiming at a lightweight engine for flight purposes. His particular contribution was his work on aerofoil sections, from which the term 'Phillips Entry' is still used as a description and which were the subject of Patent Nos.13768/1884 and 13311/1891. His experimental equipment included a large steam powered Whirling Arm and a Circular Track as part of his costly experiments.
He aimed initially to develop direct lift types, i.e. helicopters, but lacking success with these, turned to gliders and models. His experience with the use of flexible fabric covering led him to decide to use solid 'sustainers', i.e. aerofoils, and he used examples of these, ranging in chord from 1.5 to 24 inches in the course of his trials. The nature of these narrow sections led to the design of 'Multi-planes' with many individual aerofoils in supporting frames. Several were built before a limited degree of success was achieved. His Patent No.20435/1890 covered machines with two or more frames.
Phillips carried out aeronautical experiments from about 1864 until 1910. Some of his early work was facilitated by his position as works manager, from 1890 to 1902, of the factory at Harrow of gun makers Cogswell and Harrison Ltd. This position, and their mutual interests, brought him into contact with Hiram Maxim. Support was also provided in 1893-1894 by the Comte de Lambert, but this was withdrawn owing to problems arising as a result of Phillips drinking habits. After retirement from business in 1902, Phillips devoted his time to experimental aeronautics and later to work as a motor and general mechanical engineer, with premises at West Barnham, Sussex. He died in 1926.
PHILLIPS helicopters and monoplane
In about 1870, a direct lift machine was constructed at Battersea, south London, in one of the railway arches. This was powered by a steam engine, of Phillips' own design, and drove contrarotating steel rotors, later replaced by 20ft diameter wooden rotors. No success was achieved during tests in Battersea Fields. In 1903, with his son A.H. Phillips, he was again testing direct lift machines at the Crystal Palace, but again without success. One of these had 33ft diameter contra-rotating rotors driven by a 15 hp petrol engine.
At this time Phillips also built a petrol engined monoplane on floats, which was launched on the Thames from Messengers Island, Surbiton with his son in control. The first trial was stopped when the port wing lifted 56ft and the machine, banking steeply, was at risk as it rounded the bend in the river towards Hampton Court. The trials were discontinued after the propeller broke and were not resumed.
In 1904, at Furzle Down Farm, Mitcham a machine with a more powerful motor driving two 20ft diameter rotors, set at nine degrees from the vertical, on the ends of a girder, was also tried. The tilt was to create some forward motion to aid takeoff, but as with previous machines, this was a complete failure. Phillips returned to direct lift machines in the autumn of 1909, when a new machine gave promising results and encouraged him to again pursue the principle, which he regarded as the practical flying machine of the future, particularly in England with its small fields and open spaces.
PHILLIPS multi-planes
Phillips pursued his aeronautical work with models after his early disappointments with rotary wings. Using models weighing up to 20 lb., which were shot from a catapult, he then constructed at Norwood a circular concrete track of 500ft circumference, 160ft diameter approximately, and tethered his machine to the center. First he used a full size type of box-kite with fabric covering, but soon decided on the use of more rigid aerofoils. This work led to the patents of 1884 and 1891 and the favoring of solid narrow aerofoils and the multi-plane type aircraft. To assess the best form for the blades, he proposed to use a steam driven whirling arm machine traversing a circumference of 323ft, 103ft diameter, to test them.
PHILLIPS multi-plane No.l 1893
Resulting from the work on the whirling arm and other tests, Phillips constructed a large unmanned multi-plane, with fifty aerofoils in a frame, mounted on a body on three wheels, with the single wheel at the front and was propelled by a compound steam engine driving a two-bladed tractor propeller. Phillips was sponsored by the Comte de Lambert at this time, which resulted in this engine being sold by the Count to the Musee de 1'Air in 1936.
The machine was tested on a circular track at Harrow, 628ft. in circumference, 200ft diameter, anchored to a central post, where it lifted itself and a 56 lb. load, a total of 416 lb., about 2ft in 1893.
Power: 6hp Phillips compound steam engine driving a two-bladed tractor propeller
Data
Span 22ft
Chord of slats 1 1/2 in
Area 136 sq. ft
Length 20ft
Height 9ft 6in
Weight 360 lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PHILLIPS multi-plane No.2 1903
There was a period of work on direct lift, before the next machine was built on the lines of the unmanned 1893 multi-plane. The new machine was constructed at Soufhminster in Essex and was tested in about September 1903.
In addition to a thirty-two slat wing, a thirteen slat front mounted elevator and five slat rudder, were fitted. The contrarotating propellers were probably driven by a petrol motor. There are reports of a flight reaching 2-3 feet in height for 20-30 yards, at St. Lawrence Hall, near Southminster. A witness of this, Mr. J.J. Cant of Tillingham, confirmed this in November 1972, but there is no other evidence. The only known photographs came from Phillips' nephew.
There was a period of work on direct lift, before the next machine was built on the lines of the unmanned 1893 multi-plane. The new machine was constructed at Soufhminster in Essex and was tested in about September 1903.
In addition to a thirty-two slat wing, a thirteen slat front mounted elevator and five slat rudder, were fitted. The contrarotating propellers were probably driven by a petrol motor. There are reports of a flight reaching 2-3 feet in height for 20-30 yards, at St. Lawrence Hall, near Southminster. A witness of this, Mr. J.J. Cant of Tillingham, confirmed this in November 1972, but there is no other evidence. The only known photographs came from Phillips' nephew.
Phillips No.2 multiplane was tested at Southminster in Essex in 1903 and is reported to have lifted off briefly.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PHILLIPS multi-plane No.3 1904
Another multi-plane was tested at Furzle Down Farm, Mitcham and was found to be longitudinally unstable, although it lifted at a speed of 50ft per second, 34mph. The total weight was 600lb.
The machine, of which a photograph exists and some details, was a tractor driven by a 22hp petrol engine. The pilot sat behind the lifting surfaces, of which there were twenty. The machine had a cruciform tail unit with elevator and a rudder and was mounted on three bicycle wheels.
PHILLIPS multi-plane No.4 1906
This version was tested on fields at Mitcham, later to become the golf course. No details are known, but it was probably a revision of No.3.
Another multi-plane was tested at Furzle Down Farm, Mitcham and was found to be longitudinally unstable, although it lifted at a speed of 50ft per second, 34mph. The total weight was 600lb.
The machine, of which a photograph exists and some details, was a tractor driven by a 22hp petrol engine. The pilot sat behind the lifting surfaces, of which there were twenty. The machine had a cruciform tail unit with elevator and a rudder and was mounted on three bicycle wheels.
PHILLIPS multi-plane No.4 1906
This version was tested on fields at Mitcham, later to become the golf course. No details are known, but it was probably a revision of No.3.
Phillips No.3 multiplane. This petrol-engined machine was able to take off and fly a short distance at Mitcham in 1904.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PHILLIPS multi-plane No.5 1907
This was a most unusual multi-plane, built with 200 slats, 1_ inches wide and 1/8" thick and with two inch spaces between them, carried in four separate frames. It was a tractor with, presumably, the previous engine driving a wide bladed propeller. There were no tail surfaces and the pilot sat in the center between two of the frames. The body of the machine consisted of a triangular girder with lattice bracing of steel ribbon. The machine rested on two twenty-eight inch bicycle wheels in tandem with two smaller wheels at the wingtips.
It seems possible that Phillips lifted off the ground with this machine at Streatham in the middle of 1907. The airborne distance of about 500ft in a 30mph wind was calculated later. Although Phillips never claimed this as a flight, it could well have been the first sustained flight in the country. Further tests anchored to a pole by a 200ft wire were also made. Multi-planes, and No.5 in particular, were more in the nature of test equipment and not suitable for development into successful flying machines.
Power: 22hp petrol engine, eight-cylinder air-cooled make unknown, driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 20ft
Length 15ft
Area 140 sq ft
Height 10ft
Weight 500 lb.
This was a most unusual multi-plane, built with 200 slats, 1_ inches wide and 1/8" thick and with two inch spaces between them, carried in four separate frames. It was a tractor with, presumably, the previous engine driving a wide bladed propeller. There were no tail surfaces and the pilot sat in the center between two of the frames. The body of the machine consisted of a triangular girder with lattice bracing of steel ribbon. The machine rested on two twenty-eight inch bicycle wheels in tandem with two smaller wheels at the wingtips.
It seems possible that Phillips lifted off the ground with this machine at Streatham in the middle of 1907. The airborne distance of about 500ft in a 30mph wind was calculated later. Although Phillips never claimed this as a flight, it could well have been the first sustained flight in the country. Further tests anchored to a pole by a 200ft wire were also made. Multi-planes, and No.5 in particular, were more in the nature of test equipment and not suitable for development into successful flying machines.
Power: 22hp petrol engine, eight-cylinder air-cooled make unknown, driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 20ft
Length 15ft
Area 140 sq ft
Height 10ft
Weight 500 lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PICKERING & WILLOUGHBY glider (Charles Leigh Pickering, and Norman Dean Willoughby, Knutsford, Cheshire)
This was constructed in the summer of 1910 by two friends, aged sixteen and fifteen respectively, and was a tail-first type, based on the Valkyrie monoplane. It was substantially built and designed for easy transport; it had cost . 150 and been built in a fortnight. Span was 26ft, Length 20ft.
This was constructed in the summer of 1910 by two friends, aged sixteen and fifteen respectively, and was a tail-first type, based on the Valkyrie monoplane. It was substantially built and designed for easy transport; it had cost . 150 and been built in a fortnight. Span was 26ft, Length 20ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PICKERSGILL monoplanes (James Thompson Pickersgill, Park Lane, Longlee, Keighley, Yorkshire)
Patent No.307/1909 was applied for in January 1909, for a machine with a near circular wing, below which hung the tubular steel airframe, balanced so that, in the event of engine failure, the machine would descend as a parachute. The patent shows a twin-engined pusher with coupled drive by chains, with a front biplane elevator and twin rear rudders, mounted on a four wheeled undercarriage.
The local press reported that Pickersgill made three machines, one of which he assembled in 1909 in a marquee on a farm near Harden, with the intention of entering this for the Blackpool Meeting, to be held from 18-23 October 1909, but he was unable to complete the aircraft in time. He appears to have abandoned the circular wing by this time, for the only illustration found, is of a high wing, parallel chord monoplane with single acting ailerons, hinged at the trailing edges, but based on an airframe similar to that in the patent. The front and rear control surfaces were different and the power was provided by a single JAP vee-twin engine driving the propeller direct. However, it would seem that the machine was originally fitted with a chain drive to the propeller and this broke on test on 16 December 1909. This prevented any attempt to fly at a meeting arranged by the Northern Aero Syndicate (J.W. House a Bleriot owner) at Halifax, which was to be held over the Christmas holiday. The machine was, however, exhibited at Halifax Zoo unflown instead.
On 4 and 5 January 1910 the machine was being towed back to Pickersgill's home at night by horses, when it slid off the bogie, which had shed a wheel. The effort was too much and it was decided to store the machine in the yard of the 'T'Gawmless Inn' at Cullingworth, to be collected the following day. However a gale destroyed the machine in the night and it never did fly.
Another version, probably a reconstruction, was fitted with two JAP vee-twin engines. The two engines drove separate propellers from countershafts, but were coupled together to give 16hp. A Mr. Taylor of the Central Motor Co. of Keighley supervised the preparation of the power.
Two 6ft 8in diameter propellers are known to have survived until at least 1971. It is unclear which power came first, but no doubt, it was one based on the scheme shown in the patent sketches. Patents 307/1909 and 21411/1910, which appear not to have been accepted, are relevant.
Patent No.307/1909 was applied for in January 1909, for a machine with a near circular wing, below which hung the tubular steel airframe, balanced so that, in the event of engine failure, the machine would descend as a parachute. The patent shows a twin-engined pusher with coupled drive by chains, with a front biplane elevator and twin rear rudders, mounted on a four wheeled undercarriage.
The local press reported that Pickersgill made three machines, one of which he assembled in 1909 in a marquee on a farm near Harden, with the intention of entering this for the Blackpool Meeting, to be held from 18-23 October 1909, but he was unable to complete the aircraft in time. He appears to have abandoned the circular wing by this time, for the only illustration found, is of a high wing, parallel chord monoplane with single acting ailerons, hinged at the trailing edges, but based on an airframe similar to that in the patent. The front and rear control surfaces were different and the power was provided by a single JAP vee-twin engine driving the propeller direct. However, it would seem that the machine was originally fitted with a chain drive to the propeller and this broke on test on 16 December 1909. This prevented any attempt to fly at a meeting arranged by the Northern Aero Syndicate (J.W. House a Bleriot owner) at Halifax, which was to be held over the Christmas holiday. The machine was, however, exhibited at Halifax Zoo unflown instead.
On 4 and 5 January 1910 the machine was being towed back to Pickersgill's home at night by horses, when it slid off the bogie, which had shed a wheel. The effort was too much and it was decided to store the machine in the yard of the 'T'Gawmless Inn' at Cullingworth, to be collected the following day. However a gale destroyed the machine in the night and it never did fly.
Another version, probably a reconstruction, was fitted with two JAP vee-twin engines. The two engines drove separate propellers from countershafts, but were coupled together to give 16hp. A Mr. Taylor of the Central Motor Co. of Keighley supervised the preparation of the power.
Two 6ft 8in diameter propellers are known to have survived until at least 1971. It is unclear which power came first, but no doubt, it was one based on the scheme shown in the patent sketches. Patents 307/1909 and 21411/1910, which appear not to have been accepted, are relevant.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PIFFARD Biplane No.l (Harold Hume Piffard, Bedford Park, Chiswick, London W4)
The first Piffard biplane was largely manufactured in the studio at his home, with the aid of two carpenters, and was taken to a shed rented from Thorneycrofts at Back Common Rd., Turnham Green, Ealing for final assembly and engine testing. In September 1909 a field was rented at North Ealing adjacent to Hanger Lane Farm, in the area which soon became Acton Aerodrome. After various problems, the machine was coaxed off the ground to a height of twelve feet for about 100 yards on 2 December 1909. That night a gale destroyed the marquee and the aircraft.
The machine was a pusher biplane with long curved cane skids, reinforced with steel, similar to a Sommer in appearance. The wings were double surfaced, with fabric back to the main spar on the lower surface. The engine was originally spring loaded, on a sliding bed, in a fore and aft direction and could move forward as power was applied. This was to bring the center of gravity forward and reduce the angle of incidence and risk of a stall; the system could also be locked by the pilot, but was abandoned at the suggestion of W.O. Manning.
A front mounted elevator and rudder were fitted, together with a fixed stabilizer above and further forward. A rear non-lifting stabilizer was also fitted. Ailerons on the front outboard interplane struts were controlled by a rocking seat backrest. Vertical fabric panels were fitted to the intermediate interplane struts.
The undercarriage consisted of a sprung nose wheel and two rear wheels, the latter arranged to lift above the level of the skids for landing. A pair of radiators faced the airflow on either side of the pilot.
Power: 35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee
Data
Span 34ft 6in
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 510 sq. ft
PIFFARD biplane No.2
Construction of a second biplane was begun immediately, utilizing parts and the engine of the first. It was ready for testing at Shoreham by 3 May 1910, but, after a number of short straights at low level, the machine was badly smashed and Piffard injured on 21 May 1910.
The machine was rebuilt by 23 June 1910, but bad weather prevented tests until 10 July 1910, after which further short flights were made, with damage occurring and repairs necessary. Flights of up to half a mile were made. On 4 October 1910, after a successful flight, including a turn, a gust caused the machine to crash. The tail booms broke behind the wings and extensive damage was done although the engine was unharmed. Piffard had already decided to make a machine of a new design.
The layout of the second machine was generally as No. 1 although some important changes had been made. The lower fabric covering of the wing, back to the spar, was previously attached to the ribs on both sides, but on this machine it was released on the lower surface to allow it to take the shape created by the pressure of the air. The ailerons, initially on the interplane struts, were removed and single acting ailerons were hinged to the trailing edges of all four wings. The rudder was transferred to the tail, and the front fixed stabilizer removed. The main wheels were brought forward and a steerable tail wheel, in addition to cane skids, was fitted. The tail wheel was frequently broken and was soon discarded.
Power: 35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled driving a 7ft diameter Weiss propeller
Data
Span 34ft
Chord 6ft
Area 408 sq. ft
Area elevator 56 sq. ft
Area rudder 10 sq. ft
Area stabilizer 63 sq. ft
Length 31ft
Weight allup 850 lb.
The first Piffard biplane was largely manufactured in the studio at his home, with the aid of two carpenters, and was taken to a shed rented from Thorneycrofts at Back Common Rd., Turnham Green, Ealing for final assembly and engine testing. In September 1909 a field was rented at North Ealing adjacent to Hanger Lane Farm, in the area which soon became Acton Aerodrome. After various problems, the machine was coaxed off the ground to a height of twelve feet for about 100 yards on 2 December 1909. That night a gale destroyed the marquee and the aircraft.
The machine was a pusher biplane with long curved cane skids, reinforced with steel, similar to a Sommer in appearance. The wings were double surfaced, with fabric back to the main spar on the lower surface. The engine was originally spring loaded, on a sliding bed, in a fore and aft direction and could move forward as power was applied. This was to bring the center of gravity forward and reduce the angle of incidence and risk of a stall; the system could also be locked by the pilot, but was abandoned at the suggestion of W.O. Manning.
A front mounted elevator and rudder were fitted, together with a fixed stabilizer above and further forward. A rear non-lifting stabilizer was also fitted. Ailerons on the front outboard interplane struts were controlled by a rocking seat backrest. Vertical fabric panels were fitted to the intermediate interplane struts.
The undercarriage consisted of a sprung nose wheel and two rear wheels, the latter arranged to lift above the level of the skids for landing. A pair of radiators faced the airflow on either side of the pilot.
Power: 35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled vee
Data
Span 34ft 6in
Chord 6ft 6in
Area 510 sq. ft
PIFFARD biplane No.2
Construction of a second biplane was begun immediately, utilizing parts and the engine of the first. It was ready for testing at Shoreham by 3 May 1910, but, after a number of short straights at low level, the machine was badly smashed and Piffard injured on 21 May 1910.
The machine was rebuilt by 23 June 1910, but bad weather prevented tests until 10 July 1910, after which further short flights were made, with damage occurring and repairs necessary. Flights of up to half a mile were made. On 4 October 1910, after a successful flight, including a turn, a gust caused the machine to crash. The tail booms broke behind the wings and extensive damage was done although the engine was unharmed. Piffard had already decided to make a machine of a new design.
The layout of the second machine was generally as No. 1 although some important changes had been made. The lower fabric covering of the wing, back to the spar, was previously attached to the ribs on both sides, but on this machine it was released on the lower surface to allow it to take the shape created by the pressure of the air. The ailerons, initially on the interplane struts, were removed and single acting ailerons were hinged to the trailing edges of all four wings. The rudder was transferred to the tail, and the front fixed stabilizer removed. The main wheels were brought forward and a steerable tail wheel, in addition to cane skids, was fitted. The tail wheel was frequently broken and was soon discarded.
Power: 35hp ENV type D eight-cylinder water-cooled driving a 7ft diameter Weiss propeller
Data
Span 34ft
Chord 6ft
Area 408 sq. ft
Area elevator 56 sq. ft
Area rudder 10 sq. ft
Area stabilizer 63 sq. ft
Length 31ft
Weight allup 850 lb.
Piffard biplane No.2 used the engine and parts of No.l and achieved a number of straight flights at Shoreham in 1911.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PIFFARD hydrobiplane No.3
In January 1911, in an article in The Aero, Piffard indicated that a successor was in hand, to the machine wrecked in the previous October. This time his intention was to fly from the water. The information on his seaplanes is not available in much detail, but it would appear that he produced a pusher biplane fitted with his original engine, making use of tube in its construction.
The flotation gear consisted of a single large central float, possibly also intended to provide lift, with a pair of nose floats and a small tail float. Air bags for the minor floats were originally used. The machine was a sesquiplane, with the lower wings extending only out as far as the main booms, whereas the top wings had considerable overhang, braced by struts back to the ends of the lower spars.
The front elevator was carried on booms and was on a level with the lower wing. There was a fixed tailplane and rectangular rudder and single acting ailerons on the top wing, with the outer ends cut back diagonally.
The machine was housed at Bungalow Town, Shoreham. On 8 August 1911 the hydroplane was taken down to the sea for the first time but it capsized and had to be beached. There were further trials with no satisfactory results and the machine was reconstructed later that year.
PIFFARD hydrobiplane No.4
The rear portion of the fuselage and the center section of No.3 were used again, to form the basis of No.4, later in 1911. The wings were of two bays, with extensions on the top wings tilted upwards and braced with light struts to the lower spars. Two separate single acting ailerons on each top wing hung on the trailing edges of the main wing and the extensions. All of Piffard's wing surfaces were made with spars at the leading and trailing edges with little or no camber to the ribs. The buoyancy was now provided by two rather short main floats with a tail float as before. The main floats had, in addition, curved hydroskis attached to their undersides, which were braced back to the main structure of the aircraft.
The aircraft taxied, but would not unstick from the water; Piffard achieved no success with his seaplanes and this was his last aviation activity. The aircraft was wrecked in a gale on the beach at Shoreham at the end of 1911. The ENV engine, propeller, fuel tank and radiator were retained and now form an exhibit at the Science Museum.
In January 1911, in an article in The Aero, Piffard indicated that a successor was in hand, to the machine wrecked in the previous October. This time his intention was to fly from the water. The information on his seaplanes is not available in much detail, but it would appear that he produced a pusher biplane fitted with his original engine, making use of tube in its construction.
The flotation gear consisted of a single large central float, possibly also intended to provide lift, with a pair of nose floats and a small tail float. Air bags for the minor floats were originally used. The machine was a sesquiplane, with the lower wings extending only out as far as the main booms, whereas the top wings had considerable overhang, braced by struts back to the ends of the lower spars.
The front elevator was carried on booms and was on a level with the lower wing. There was a fixed tailplane and rectangular rudder and single acting ailerons on the top wing, with the outer ends cut back diagonally.
The machine was housed at Bungalow Town, Shoreham. On 8 August 1911 the hydroplane was taken down to the sea for the first time but it capsized and had to be beached. There were further trials with no satisfactory results and the machine was reconstructed later that year.
PIFFARD hydrobiplane No.4
The rear portion of the fuselage and the center section of No.3 were used again, to form the basis of No.4, later in 1911. The wings were of two bays, with extensions on the top wings tilted upwards and braced with light struts to the lower spars. Two separate single acting ailerons on each top wing hung on the trailing edges of the main wing and the extensions. All of Piffard's wing surfaces were made with spars at the leading and trailing edges with little or no camber to the ribs. The buoyancy was now provided by two rather short main floats with a tail float as before. The main floats had, in addition, curved hydroskis attached to their undersides, which were braced back to the main structure of the aircraft.
The aircraft taxied, but would not unstick from the water; Piffard achieved no success with his seaplanes and this was his last aviation activity. The aircraft was wrecked in a gale on the beach at Shoreham at the end of 1911. The ENV engine, propeller, fuel tank and radiator were retained and now form an exhibit at the Science Museum.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PIGGOTT No.l biplane (Piggott Bros. & Co. Ltd., 220-224 Bishopsgate St, London EC. Construction at Stanford Rivers, Ongar, Essex)
This unusual machine was designed by S.C. Parr and was reported to be built on the theories of FW. Lanchester. The aircraft was a side-by-side two-seater pusher biplane, constructed of light aluminum tubing joined by sockets. The front and rear booms, which were single tubes only at the top, were braced by wires, the front one carrying the elevator, the rear one a fixed tailplane with a shield shaped rudder, between the top and bottom members. The rear booms were spread vertically as much as possible; the top member attaching to the bracing pylon above the wing, the bottom to the lowest point on the understructure. Two large stabilizing fins were mounted on the top wings.
The wings, ailerons and the front and rear surfaces were elliptical in shape, the ailerons being mounted on the front outboard interplane struts. The main undercarriage, a pair of wheels in tandem, consisted of a pair of fabricated radius arms cantilevered from points on the main frame, with suspension by helical springs between the arms and the main frame. The skids between the wheels became effective when the wheels lifted on landing. Outboard wheels, on similar radius arms, were positioned below the last pair of interplane struts.
The power plant was rather complex, incorporating a multiple disc clutch, which was disengaged for starting. The outboard end carried a multiple disc sprocket for the wide chain taking the drive, at about 2 to 1 reduction, to a differential gearbox on, the front of the propeller shaft. The output of this gearbox was through inner and outer drive shafts, each mounting a propeller of different diameters, each with four blades. The smaller propeller was mounted about 4ft 6in behind the larger. The differential gear was designed to balance the loading on the two propellers as they counter-rotated.
In May 1910 the machine was far from completion, but it was eventually taken to Hendon for testing in 1912. It was a failure and almost certainly never left the ground.
Power: 80hp Vivinus four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving contra-rotating four-bladed metal propellers 13ft 6in and 8ft 4in diameter with adjustable pitch, through clutch, reduction chain drive and differential gear box.
Data
Span 60ft
Max chord 5ft
Area 568 sq. ft
Area elevator 33 sq. ft
Area tailplane 44 sq. ft
Area rudder 20 sq. ft
Length 34 sq. ft
Weight allup 1,150lb.
Speed 48 mph
This unusual machine was designed by S.C. Parr and was reported to be built on the theories of FW. Lanchester. The aircraft was a side-by-side two-seater pusher biplane, constructed of light aluminum tubing joined by sockets. The front and rear booms, which were single tubes only at the top, were braced by wires, the front one carrying the elevator, the rear one a fixed tailplane with a shield shaped rudder, between the top and bottom members. The rear booms were spread vertically as much as possible; the top member attaching to the bracing pylon above the wing, the bottom to the lowest point on the understructure. Two large stabilizing fins were mounted on the top wings.
The wings, ailerons and the front and rear surfaces were elliptical in shape, the ailerons being mounted on the front outboard interplane struts. The main undercarriage, a pair of wheels in tandem, consisted of a pair of fabricated radius arms cantilevered from points on the main frame, with suspension by helical springs between the arms and the main frame. The skids between the wheels became effective when the wheels lifted on landing. Outboard wheels, on similar radius arms, were positioned below the last pair of interplane struts.
The power plant was rather complex, incorporating a multiple disc clutch, which was disengaged for starting. The outboard end carried a multiple disc sprocket for the wide chain taking the drive, at about 2 to 1 reduction, to a differential gearbox on, the front of the propeller shaft. The output of this gearbox was through inner and outer drive shafts, each mounting a propeller of different diameters, each with four blades. The smaller propeller was mounted about 4ft 6in behind the larger. The differential gear was designed to balance the loading on the two propellers as they counter-rotated.
In May 1910 the machine was far from completion, but it was eventually taken to Hendon for testing in 1912. It was a failure and almost certainly never left the ground.
Power: 80hp Vivinus four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving contra-rotating four-bladed metal propellers 13ft 6in and 8ft 4in diameter with adjustable pitch, through clutch, reduction chain drive and differential gear box.
Data
Span 60ft
Max chord 5ft
Area 568 sq. ft
Area elevator 33 sq. ft
Area tailplane 44 sq. ft
Area rudder 20 sq. ft
Length 34 sq. ft
Weight allup 1,150lb.
Speed 48 mph
Piggott No.l biplane built at Ongar, Essex from 1910 was eventually taken to Hendon for testing in 1912 but was a failure.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PIGGOTT monoplane
This machine was exhibited at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911, with a fully enclosed cockpit. However, before it was tested at Hendon by S.C. Parr, it was modified to provide an open pilot's cockpit. During the tests the machine left the ground, but the undercarriage was damaged on landing. Although the damage was repaired, there were no further reports and the machine was abandoned.
As originally built, the Piggott monoplane had a light body totally enclosing the engine, pilot and passengers, who gained access to the interior cabin through a door in the underside; the only vision was through portholes. The engine was set back in the fuselage and required an extension shaft to carry the propeller, which had a streamlined boss to blend into the lines of the body. The radiator was shaped to lie on top of the front fuselage. A twin skid Farman-type undercarriage, with two pairs of rubber sprung wheels and a large tail wheel were fitted. A rather small rudder, elongated tailplanes and a one piece elevator comprised the tail unit. Lateral control was by warping, and all control cables were duplicated.
Power: 80hp Vivinus four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 30ft 6in
Weight 850 lb.
Length 24ft 6in
Weight allup 1,4001b.
Max speed 75 mph
This machine was exhibited at the Olympia Aero Show in March 1911, with a fully enclosed cockpit. However, before it was tested at Hendon by S.C. Parr, it was modified to provide an open pilot's cockpit. During the tests the machine left the ground, but the undercarriage was damaged on landing. Although the damage was repaired, there were no further reports and the machine was abandoned.
As originally built, the Piggott monoplane had a light body totally enclosing the engine, pilot and passengers, who gained access to the interior cabin through a door in the underside; the only vision was through portholes. The engine was set back in the fuselage and required an extension shaft to carry the propeller, which had a streamlined boss to blend into the lines of the body. The radiator was shaped to lie on top of the front fuselage. A twin skid Farman-type undercarriage, with two pairs of rubber sprung wheels and a large tail wheel were fitted. A rather small rudder, elongated tailplanes and a one piece elevator comprised the tail unit. Lateral control was by warping, and all control cables were duplicated.
Power: 80hp Vivinus four-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 30ft 6in
Weight 850 lb.
Length 24ft 6in
Weight allup 1,4001b.
Max speed 75 mph
Piggott monoplane shown at Olympia in March 1911 was abandoned after damage incurred while on test at Hendon.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PIGGOTT biplane
The third, and final, Piggott aircraft was a small two-seater biplane entered for the Military Trials of August 1912 (No. 29), for which puipose it was unsuited, being under powered, and consequently unable to perform any of the tests.
The design was of conventional tractor layout, but featured three bay wings, with a narrow gap, and single interplane struts. The crew sat exposed above the level of the top wing and were vulnerable if the machine should overturn. The tailplane extended well forward along the fuselage sides and a crescent shaped rudder extended, equally above and below the fuselage.
Power: 25-35hp Anzani three-cylinder Y-type air-cooled radial.
Data
Span 25ft 6in
Gap 2ft 6in
Area 100 sq. ft
Weight 300 lb.
Weight allup 700lb.
Length 17ft 6in
Max speed 55 mph
The third, and final, Piggott aircraft was a small two-seater biplane entered for the Military Trials of August 1912 (No. 29), for which puipose it was unsuited, being under powered, and consequently unable to perform any of the tests.
The design was of conventional tractor layout, but featured three bay wings, with a narrow gap, and single interplane struts. The crew sat exposed above the level of the top wing and were vulnerable if the machine should overturn. The tailplane extended well forward along the fuselage sides and a crescent shaped rudder extended, equally above and below the fuselage.
Power: 25-35hp Anzani three-cylinder Y-type air-cooled radial.
Data
Span 25ft 6in
Gap 2ft 6in
Area 100 sq. ft
Weight 300 lb.
Weight allup 700lb.
Length 17ft 6in
Max speed 55 mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PILCHER gliders (Percy Sinclair Pilcher, Glasgow and London)
Pilcher became interested in flight whilst at Glasgow University. He began by making and testing models from 1893 and made his first full size glider in 1895. He corresponded with Lilienthal and visited Germany that year, to witness and discuss matters at first hand, at a time when his machine was well advanced in construction. In the space of a year or so Pilcher had made his fourth glider, at which time he moved south to London, to work for the Maxim, Nordenfeldt Gun Co. as Hiram Maxim's assistant; this was around March 1896.
This arrangement terminated, when Maxim was no longer managing his own company and Pilcher then became joint managing director of Wilson and Pilcher Ltd., an engineering company registered in November 1897, with workshop premises in Clerkenwell. The latest of his gliders, the Hawk, was brought down with him for further development and trials were carried out at Eynsford in Kent. This glider was still in use in September 1899 when he agreed to demonstrate it at Stanford Park, near Rugby, which resulted in an accident on 30 September 1899, from which he died two days later.
Also at Stanford Park, for exhibition only, was a triplane glider, to which Pilcher intended to fit a small 'oil engine', that had already been on test, but required further development.
PILCHER Bat glider
This first glider was made early in 1895 and was tested from slopes at Cardross by the River Clyde from June of that year.
The machine was a monoplane hang glider with considerable dihedral, controlled by weight shift only. A triangular front frame, and a single rod to carry the fin, comprised the center structure of the machine. A tailplane was fitted later. The wings were made separately, the main spars being lashed to the front frame and extensively braced by wires. Later the excessive dihedral was reduced, by curving the wings downwards, and introducing greater camber.
Data
Area 150 sq. ft
Weight 45 lb.
Weight allup 1901b.
PILCHER Beetle glider
Pilcher's second machine was ready for use in about June 1895, but not for very long, as he found the machine ungainly. It had been assembled in a barn at Auchensail, north of Cardross, where he was able to spend more time at practice.
He had built the Beetle with the intention of fitting an engine, after the initial gliding trials, and consequently it was stronger and heavier than would otherwise be the case. The body consisted of two parallel Warren girders, between which the shoulders could pass to enable the pilot to rest his arms in sleeves on the bottom longerons. The wing, of angular shape, was built round five spars and was braced to kingposts above, and to the girders below. A circular fin and tailplane, in the form of a cross, were fitted.
The Beetle was discarded in favor of the modified Bat, which was put back into use again in September.
Data
Area 170 sq. ft
Weight 80 lb.
Weight allup 225 1b.
PILCHER Gull glider
The third glider was constructed late in 1895, but was not really proved until the following year, although there is evidence of it being complete, but damaged, in October 1895. The light wing loading made the Gull difficult to handle in gusty conditions in Scotland, but with better conditions in the summer of 1896, after the move to Eynsford, the Gull was flown. It suffered some damage at times and was still awaiting repair in January 1897.
The body consisted of a tapered, wire braced girder, from which a frame extended below, and which carried, at its outboard ends, the two vertical kingposts, later connected by a crossbar. The cruciform tail, as used on the Beetle, was employed. The wing structure consisted of a number of radial ribs, similar to those of the Bat, which could be swung round the kingposts to fold back for transport.
Data
Area 300 sq. ft
Weight 55 lb.
Weight allup 2001b.
Pilcher became interested in flight whilst at Glasgow University. He began by making and testing models from 1893 and made his first full size glider in 1895. He corresponded with Lilienthal and visited Germany that year, to witness and discuss matters at first hand, at a time when his machine was well advanced in construction. In the space of a year or so Pilcher had made his fourth glider, at which time he moved south to London, to work for the Maxim, Nordenfeldt Gun Co. as Hiram Maxim's assistant; this was around March 1896.
This arrangement terminated, when Maxim was no longer managing his own company and Pilcher then became joint managing director of Wilson and Pilcher Ltd., an engineering company registered in November 1897, with workshop premises in Clerkenwell. The latest of his gliders, the Hawk, was brought down with him for further development and trials were carried out at Eynsford in Kent. This glider was still in use in September 1899 when he agreed to demonstrate it at Stanford Park, near Rugby, which resulted in an accident on 30 September 1899, from which he died two days later.
Also at Stanford Park, for exhibition only, was a triplane glider, to which Pilcher intended to fit a small 'oil engine', that had already been on test, but required further development.
PILCHER Bat glider
This first glider was made early in 1895 and was tested from slopes at Cardross by the River Clyde from June of that year.
The machine was a monoplane hang glider with considerable dihedral, controlled by weight shift only. A triangular front frame, and a single rod to carry the fin, comprised the center structure of the machine. A tailplane was fitted later. The wings were made separately, the main spars being lashed to the front frame and extensively braced by wires. Later the excessive dihedral was reduced, by curving the wings downwards, and introducing greater camber.
Data
Area 150 sq. ft
Weight 45 lb.
Weight allup 1901b.
PILCHER Beetle glider
Pilcher's second machine was ready for use in about June 1895, but not for very long, as he found the machine ungainly. It had been assembled in a barn at Auchensail, north of Cardross, where he was able to spend more time at practice.
He had built the Beetle with the intention of fitting an engine, after the initial gliding trials, and consequently it was stronger and heavier than would otherwise be the case. The body consisted of two parallel Warren girders, between which the shoulders could pass to enable the pilot to rest his arms in sleeves on the bottom longerons. The wing, of angular shape, was built round five spars and was braced to kingposts above, and to the girders below. A circular fin and tailplane, in the form of a cross, were fitted.
The Beetle was discarded in favor of the modified Bat, which was put back into use again in September.
Data
Area 170 sq. ft
Weight 80 lb.
Weight allup 225 1b.
PILCHER Gull glider
The third glider was constructed late in 1895, but was not really proved until the following year, although there is evidence of it being complete, but damaged, in October 1895. The light wing loading made the Gull difficult to handle in gusty conditions in Scotland, but with better conditions in the summer of 1896, after the move to Eynsford, the Gull was flown. It suffered some damage at times and was still awaiting repair in January 1897.
The body consisted of a tapered, wire braced girder, from which a frame extended below, and which carried, at its outboard ends, the two vertical kingposts, later connected by a crossbar. The cruciform tail, as used on the Beetle, was employed. The wing structure consisted of a number of radial ribs, similar to those of the Bat, which could be swung round the kingposts to fold back for transport.
Data
Area 300 sq. ft
Weight 55 lb.
Weight allup 2001b.
Pilcher constructed the Gull, his third glider, in Scotland but moved to Eynsford in Kent in 1896 where it flew successfully.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PILCHER Hawk glider
Work began on the fourth glider towards the end of 1895, which was to be of smaller wing area than the Gull, and thus more manageable. The move to London involved Pilcher with other activities, which included the design and construction of a large exhibit, to be shown at an International Exhibition at the Imperial Institute, South Kensington. This was a lifting platform for launching gliders, and the Hawk was also displayed alongside it, under the names of Maxim and Pilcher, 32 Victoria St., London SW. The exhibition lasted four months so it was towards the end of 1896, before the Hawk was available to test. By the end of the year Pilcher had flown distances up to 100 yards and at least 150 yards had been achieved at a public demonstration in July 1897 at Eynsford.
The Pilcher gliders had been housed in Maxim's large shed on property owned by the reorganized Vickers company, who now required the removal of the shed by the end of the year, with the consequent loss of gliding facilities. Thereafter the Hawk, which was not flown at all in 1898, was used as an exhibit at lectures, until the final demonstration at which Pilcher was killed.
The center structure consisted of two curved bamboo members, joined at front and rear by cast metal fittings, the latter also providing a mounting for a hinged bamboo member to carry the tailplane, which was designed to pivot upwards only; a fin was added later.
A spar, clamped to the center structure, terminated in the uprights, which served as bracing kingposts and pivots for the axles of a pair of sprung wheels, a new feature. The wings, as before, were built with radial ribs designed to fold back fanwise; these were of bamboo and heavily cambered. The pilot stood in the center with his arms in sleeves, resting on the bamboo members.
Pilcher's intention to power the Hawk, as with his earlier gliders, was covered by patent No.9144 /1896, but this was never realized.
The Hawk still exists as an exhibit at the Royal Scottish Museum. At least six reproductions have been made for films and for display purposes, and include examples at Stanford Hall and the Science Museum in London.
Work began on the fourth glider towards the end of 1895, which was to be of smaller wing area than the Gull, and thus more manageable. The move to London involved Pilcher with other activities, which included the design and construction of a large exhibit, to be shown at an International Exhibition at the Imperial Institute, South Kensington. This was a lifting platform for launching gliders, and the Hawk was also displayed alongside it, under the names of Maxim and Pilcher, 32 Victoria St., London SW. The exhibition lasted four months so it was towards the end of 1896, before the Hawk was available to test. By the end of the year Pilcher had flown distances up to 100 yards and at least 150 yards had been achieved at a public demonstration in July 1897 at Eynsford.
The Pilcher gliders had been housed in Maxim's large shed on property owned by the reorganized Vickers company, who now required the removal of the shed by the end of the year, with the consequent loss of gliding facilities. Thereafter the Hawk, which was not flown at all in 1898, was used as an exhibit at lectures, until the final demonstration at which Pilcher was killed.
The center structure consisted of two curved bamboo members, joined at front and rear by cast metal fittings, the latter also providing a mounting for a hinged bamboo member to carry the tailplane, which was designed to pivot upwards only; a fin was added later.
A spar, clamped to the center structure, terminated in the uprights, which served as bracing kingposts and pivots for the axles of a pair of sprung wheels, a new feature. The wings, as before, were built with radial ribs designed to fold back fanwise; these were of bamboo and heavily cambered. The pilot stood in the center with his arms in sleeves, resting on the bamboo members.
Pilcher's intention to power the Hawk, as with his earlier gliders, was covered by patent No.9144 /1896, but this was never realized.
The Hawk still exists as an exhibit at the Royal Scottish Museum. At least six reproductions have been made for films and for display purposes, and include examples at Stanford Hall and the Science Museum in London.
Pilcher Hawk the fourth glider was begun late in 1895 and was flown successfully at Eynsford from 1896 until Pilcher was killed when flying it at Stanford Park, Rugby in September 1899.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PILCHER multi-plane
By 1897 Pilcher was corresponding with Chanute, a protagonist of multiple wings, which may have influenced him to construct a multi-plane as his fifth machine. On 30 September 1899, at Stanford Park, in addition to the Hawk, there was an untried glider described as a 'three decked machine' at the time. There is some uncertainty whether it was in fact a triplane or perhaps an incomplete quadruplane, as one of Pilcher's surviving drawings shows such a machine. T.W.K. Clarke produced a drawing of a triplane in 1910, from the remains of the machine and the balance of evidence favors a triplane.
Since his early experiences with the Beetle, Pilcher had contemplated the use of a power unit using steam, carbonic acid, oil or other material to extend the range of his flights. The patent No.9144 for a small pusher driven machine was based on the Hawk. A small 4hp petrol motor was designed by his partner, Walter G. Wilson in 1898-1899 and may have been of twin-cylinder horizontally opposed type. The installation of this engine in the triplane, driving a pusher propeller on a long shaft above the pilot's head, is probably the configuration of the machine that Pilcher was envisaging.
The Pilcher Triplane, probably named Duck, would have conformed to the drawing shown, which is based on the surviving data.
Data
Span 20-24ft
Area 150-170 sq. ft
Weight 50-60 lb. as a pure glider
Weight allup 256-266 lb as a powered machine
By 1897 Pilcher was corresponding with Chanute, a protagonist of multiple wings, which may have influenced him to construct a multi-plane as his fifth machine. On 30 September 1899, at Stanford Park, in addition to the Hawk, there was an untried glider described as a 'three decked machine' at the time. There is some uncertainty whether it was in fact a triplane or perhaps an incomplete quadruplane, as one of Pilcher's surviving drawings shows such a machine. T.W.K. Clarke produced a drawing of a triplane in 1910, from the remains of the machine and the balance of evidence favors a triplane.
Since his early experiences with the Beetle, Pilcher had contemplated the use of a power unit using steam, carbonic acid, oil or other material to extend the range of his flights. The patent No.9144 for a small pusher driven machine was based on the Hawk. A small 4hp petrol motor was designed by his partner, Walter G. Wilson in 1898-1899 and may have been of twin-cylinder horizontally opposed type. The installation of this engine in the triplane, driving a pusher propeller on a long shaft above the pilot's head, is probably the configuration of the machine that Pilcher was envisaging.
The Pilcher Triplane, probably named Duck, would have conformed to the drawing shown, which is based on the surviving data.
Data
Span 20-24ft
Area 150-170 sq. ft
Weight 50-60 lb. as a pure glider
Weight allup 256-266 lb as a powered machine
The Pilcher multiplane was not completed but this artists impression is based on the surviving drawings.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PORTE monoplane (Lt. J.C. Porte RN, Haslar, Portsmouth, Hampshire)
After the biplane glider, made in conjunction with Lt. Pirie, Porte made a Demoiselle type monoplane. This followed the general lines of Santos Dumont's design, with the pilot seated at the level of the lower longerons in the triangular section fuselage. There were some original features, such as the extra pair of wheels fitted on a long axle, below the pilot's position, to aid balance during the taxiing trials, and also a forward projecting skid.
A biplane, which Porte was reported to be making with a 40hp Green engine and using metal construction, failed to materialize.
Power: 35hp Dutheil-Chalmers two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled
Data
Span 22ft
Length 27ft
After the biplane glider, made in conjunction with Lt. Pirie, Porte made a Demoiselle type monoplane. This followed the general lines of Santos Dumont's design, with the pilot seated at the level of the lower longerons in the triangular section fuselage. There were some original features, such as the extra pair of wheels fitted on a long axle, below the pilot's position, to aid balance during the taxiing trials, and also a forward projecting skid.
A biplane, which Porte was reported to be making with a 40hp Green engine and using metal construction, failed to materialize.
Power: 35hp Dutheil-Chalmers two-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled
Data
Span 22ft
Length 27ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PORTE & PIRIE glider (Lts. J.C. Porte and W.B. Pirie RN, Haslar, Portsmouth)
Two reported attempts to fly the glider at Portsdown Hill from a trolley on a track both resulted in damage. Porte continued with his Demoiselle monoplane, and later became a director of the British Deperdussin Co. A project to fly the Atlantic in a Curtis s flying boat was stopped by the outbreak of war. In wartime he was the leading figure on flying boats at Felixstowe. The glider had equal span wings, notable for the heavy stagger, the trailing edge of the top wing being vertically in line with the leading edge of the bottom wing. Four pairs of N-shaped interplane struts spaced the gap, with ailerons mounted on each outboard pair. There were also rudders on each vertical strut at the wingtips. An elevator was carried on the tail booms and the machine rested on two skids on its launching trolley.
The two officers sat side by side in the center section, Porte controlling the elevator and ailerons, possibly also serving as elevators, by means of a lever, while Pirie operated the rudders directly by a cable.
Data
Span 26ft
Two reported attempts to fly the glider at Portsdown Hill from a trolley on a track both resulted in damage. Porte continued with his Demoiselle monoplane, and later became a director of the British Deperdussin Co. A project to fly the Atlantic in a Curtis s flying boat was stopped by the outbreak of war. In wartime he was the leading figure on flying boats at Felixstowe. The glider had equal span wings, notable for the heavy stagger, the trailing edge of the top wing being vertically in line with the leading edge of the bottom wing. Four pairs of N-shaped interplane struts spaced the gap, with ailerons mounted on each outboard pair. There were also rudders on each vertical strut at the wingtips. An elevator was carried on the tail booms and the machine rested on two skids on its launching trolley.
The two officers sat side by side in the center section, Porte controlling the elevator and ailerons, possibly also serving as elevators, by means of a lever, while Pirie operated the rudders directly by a cable.
Data
Span 26ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PORTER helicopter (J. Robertson Porter, 9 Gray's Inn Square, London EC)
Porter exhibited his direct lift machine at Cordingley's Motor Car Exhibition at the Agricultural Hall, Islington in March 1908 and again at the Sports and Travel Exhibition at Olympia in July 1909.
The design was covered by patent No.21261 /1908 and consisted of two ducted fans in a frame, driven through shafts, gearboxes and a chain drive from the motor mounted on the base. Each fan had four separate stages and was enclosed in a cowl to direct the air pressure downwards. A pusher propeller was mounted on an extension of the horizontal main shaft; a rudder was provided at the rear and was controllable from the operator's station at the front of the machine.
A similar but smaller machine with a single two-stage ducted fan was also proposed.
Power: 6hp JAP two-cylinder air-cooled
Data
Length 16ft
Width. 8ft
Height 14ft
Weight 200 lb.
Porter exhibited his direct lift machine at Cordingley's Motor Car Exhibition at the Agricultural Hall, Islington in March 1908 and again at the Sports and Travel Exhibition at Olympia in July 1909.
The design was covered by patent No.21261 /1908 and consisted of two ducted fans in a frame, driven through shafts, gearboxes and a chain drive from the motor mounted on the base. Each fan had four separate stages and was enclosed in a cowl to direct the air pressure downwards. A pusher propeller was mounted on an extension of the horizontal main shaft; a rudder was provided at the rear and was controllable from the operator's station at the front of the machine.
A similar but smaller machine with a single two-stage ducted fan was also proposed.
Power: 6hp JAP two-cylinder air-cooled
Data
Length 16ft
Width. 8ft
Height 14ft
Weight 200 lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PORTER 'Gyropachute' (J. Robertson Porter, 9 Gray's Inn Square, London EC)
This vertical lift machine was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1913 by Messrs. Dagnall, Mallinson and Porter. It consisted of a frame of steel tube, over which was formed a bell shaped covering with a flexible skirt. Inside this was a rotor driven from below, by a Gnome rotary engine, with the fifteen gallon and two gallon fuel and oil tanks revolving with the engine. A smaller parachute surface at the bottom encompassed the pilot's station, at the base of the machine. The control of horizontal movement was obtained by manipulating sections of the skirt to release some of the air pressure.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Diameter 14ft
Height 11ft
Area 400 sq. ft
Weight 350 lb.
This vertical lift machine was exhibited at the Aero Show at Olympia in March 1913 by Messrs. Dagnall, Mallinson and Porter. It consisted of a frame of steel tube, over which was formed a bell shaped covering with a flexible skirt. Inside this was a rotor driven from below, by a Gnome rotary engine, with the fifteen gallon and two gallon fuel and oil tanks revolving with the engine. A smaller parachute surface at the bottom encompassed the pilot's station, at the base of the machine. The control of horizontal movement was obtained by manipulating sections of the skirt to release some of the air pressure.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Diameter 14ft
Height 11ft
Area 400 sq. ft
Weight 350 lb.
Porter Gyropachute was an unusual type exhibited at Olympia in March 1913 of which no more was heard.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PORTWAY monoplane (A.P. Portway & Portway, Bromley, Kent)
A modified form of the Santos Dumont Demoiselle was made by the Portway brothers in early 1910. It was flown at West Wickham, although flying was limited by the nature of the ground and damage to the wheels. The fuselage was made of bamboo with cast aluminum sockets at the joints.
Power: 35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled fantype semi-radial driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 25ft
Area 150 sq. ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Weight 350 lb.
A modified form of the Santos Dumont Demoiselle was made by the Portway brothers in early 1910. It was flown at West Wickham, although flying was limited by the nature of the ground and damage to the wheels. The fuselage was made of bamboo with cast aluminum sockets at the joints.
Power: 35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled fantype semi-radial driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 25ft
Area 150 sq. ft
Chord 6ft 6in
Weight 350 lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
POYNTER monoplane (E.J. Poynter, Twickenham, Middlesex and Brooklands)
Poynter was an artist and model maker, who had a full size monoplane of his own design constructed by Howard Wright at Battersea. It was completed and taken to Brooklands for assembly early in June 1910. It was apparently never flown, as Poynter had a car accident and, despite being well made by a reputable constructor, the monoplane found no further use.
The machine had a large tapered monoplane wing braced with kingposts, in the style of the Antoinette. There was a heavy twin skid main undercarriage, with two pairs of sprung wheels. The large cruciform tail, with radial ribs, was mounted on a universal pivot, similar to that of the Demoiselle, and required a very tall tailwheel strut to provide adequate ground clearance. The engine was mounted high on the top longerons and was controlled by two foot pedals, one for the throttle and the other for a valve lifter for starting.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled
Data
Span 45ft
Chord 9ft tapering to 6ft
Area 300 sq. ft
Area elevators 60 sq. ft
Area rudder 30 sq. ft
Length 28ft
Poynter was an artist and model maker, who had a full size monoplane of his own design constructed by Howard Wright at Battersea. It was completed and taken to Brooklands for assembly early in June 1910. It was apparently never flown, as Poynter had a car accident and, despite being well made by a reputable constructor, the monoplane found no further use.
The machine had a large tapered monoplane wing braced with kingposts, in the style of the Antoinette. There was a heavy twin skid main undercarriage, with two pairs of sprung wheels. The large cruciform tail, with radial ribs, was mounted on a universal pivot, similar to that of the Demoiselle, and required a very tall tailwheel strut to provide adequate ground clearance. The engine was mounted high on the top longerons and was controlled by two foot pedals, one for the throttle and the other for a valve lifter for starting.
Power: 60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled
Data
Span 45ft
Chord 9ft tapering to 6ft
Area 300 sq. ft
Area elevators 60 sq. ft
Area rudder 30 sq. ft
Length 28ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
PUPIN motoplane. (Emile Pupin and Marc Denaus, 114 Wardour St., London W)
Early in 1911, a machine of unusual layout arrived at Hendon. It was a monoplane with an open girder fuselage mounted on a two wheel undercarriage with two skids, and a tail wheel on a tall structure. The engine, of unidentified type, was mounted in the center and drove, through chains and shafts, a pair of propellers mounted alongside the rear fuselage. A long rectangular fin was mounted above the forward fuselage with a rudder at the tail.
Three pairs of equal span wings were fitted, which could be varied in incidence and moved differentially in conjunction with the rudder. Patent No 27 476/1909 is relevant.
On test on 10 February 1911, three of the wings were damaged and that was the last heard of the motoplane.
Early in 1911, a machine of unusual layout arrived at Hendon. It was a monoplane with an open girder fuselage mounted on a two wheel undercarriage with two skids, and a tail wheel on a tall structure. The engine, of unidentified type, was mounted in the center and drove, through chains and shafts, a pair of propellers mounted alongside the rear fuselage. A long rectangular fin was mounted above the forward fuselage with a rudder at the tail.
Three pairs of equal span wings were fitted, which could be varied in incidence and moved differentially in conjunction with the rudder. Patent No 27 476/1909 is relevant.
On test on 10 February 1911, three of the wings were damaged and that was the last heard of the motoplane.
Pupin monoplane, with three pairs of wings, seen at Hendon in 1911. A new arrival at the London Aerodrome. Mr. Pupin, the designer, is standing to the right.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
R.A.S. Monoplane (R.A.S. Aeroplane Co., Gosport, Hampshire)
This tractor monoplane appeared in October 1910, but reports disappeared from the Press soon after and it was presumably unsuccessful on test.
The fuselage was an open braced girder of triangular section, the two top longerons and the struts being of circular section hickory wood; the bottom longeron was of rectangular section forming a keel which extended from below the engine to the tail. The fuselage rested on an undercarriage structure made mainly of steel tubing with two hickory cross members. A combination of air pressure with compression and tension springs provided the suspension of the fork mounted wheels. The tail wheel steered in unison with the rudder and was sprung by air and compression spring.
The tail unit comprised a one piece tailplane, adjustable for incidence, and triangular shaped elevator. Both the fin and the rudder were triangular in shape, with a small rudder below the tailplane on an extension of the rudder post. A further fin was fitted below the pilot's seat.
The wing was built with a main spar which, in combination with the top and bottom bracing, contained the compression loads without loading the fuselage. The full span rear spar could be rocked bodily to provide lateral warping control activated by a system of cables and pulleys to a wheel on the horizontal control shaft; the elevator was operated by the fore and aft movement of this wheel. Foot pedals controlled the rudder and tail wheel.
Power: 35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled fantype semiradial driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 32ft.4in
Chord 7ft tapering to 6ft 6in
Area 210 sq. ft
Length 28ft 6in
Weight allup 700lb.
This tractor monoplane appeared in October 1910, but reports disappeared from the Press soon after and it was presumably unsuccessful on test.
The fuselage was an open braced girder of triangular section, the two top longerons and the struts being of circular section hickory wood; the bottom longeron was of rectangular section forming a keel which extended from below the engine to the tail. The fuselage rested on an undercarriage structure made mainly of steel tubing with two hickory cross members. A combination of air pressure with compression and tension springs provided the suspension of the fork mounted wheels. The tail wheel steered in unison with the rudder and was sprung by air and compression spring.
The tail unit comprised a one piece tailplane, adjustable for incidence, and triangular shaped elevator. Both the fin and the rudder were triangular in shape, with a small rudder below the tailplane on an extension of the rudder post. A further fin was fitted below the pilot's seat.
The wing was built with a main spar which, in combination with the top and bottom bracing, contained the compression loads without loading the fuselage. The full span rear spar could be rocked bodily to provide lateral warping control activated by a system of cables and pulleys to a wheel on the horizontal control shaft; the elevator was operated by the fore and aft movement of this wheel. Foot pedals controlled the rudder and tail wheel.
Power: 35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled fantype semiradial driving a 7ft diameter propeller
Data
Span 32ft.4in
Chord 7ft tapering to 6ft 6in
Area 210 sq. ft
Length 28ft 6in
Weight allup 700lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RADLEY ENGLAND waterplane No.l (James Radley and Eric Gordon England, Portholme & Shoreham)
This big six seater, twin-hull flying boat was built in 1912-1913 at Portholme. Although not eligible for competing in the Daily Mail Circuit of Britain Contest to be held in August 1913, it was to form the basis of a suitable machine with a British-made engine.
The initial flight trials were carried out with a temporary four wheel undercarriage and tail wheels on the floats, at Portholme and flotation tests also on the local river. The machine then was moved to Shoreham, where it was tested on the River Adur. It was soon moved to Brighton and housed in Volk's hangar, but it sank close inshore in early June and was moved back to Shoreham.
It was possible that some salvaged items were used in the second machine, but since there were so many differences, this seems unlikely.
The wings contained three bays outboard of the tail booms, with a slight overhang of the top wing; within the tail booms the center section bays were smaller. The wings were unstaggered and carried ailerons on the top only.
The aircraft was mounted on each float with three struts only and bracing wires. Each float had a front and rear watertight compartment, between which was an open cockpit for three persons, the pilot seated in front on the starboard side, the passengers being seated side by side behind. The floats were rather like punts with flat undersides, without steps, and with curved top deckings.
The power plant was the most unusual feature of the machine, and consisted of three Gnome rotary engines on a common axis, which drove a separate propeller shaft above them. A U-shaped cowling surrounded the front engine to act as an oil collector. The fuel and oil were carried in a cylindrical tank above the propeller shaft, the fuel and oil being pumped to each engine, which each had their own throttle control.
Power: Three 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries driving a 9ft.l0in. diameter four-bladed propeller, by triple chain at a ratio of 29 to 19.
Data
Span top 45ft 4in (47ft 1 lin The Aero)
Span bottom 44ft 6in
Chord 5ft 8in
Area 505 sq. ft
Area tailplane 25 sq. ft
Area elevators 32 sq. ft
Area rudders 15 sq. ft
Hulls length 15ft
Hulls beam 3ft
Length 29ft 3in
Weight 1,4001b.
Endurance 1 1/2 hr
This big six seater, twin-hull flying boat was built in 1912-1913 at Portholme. Although not eligible for competing in the Daily Mail Circuit of Britain Contest to be held in August 1913, it was to form the basis of a suitable machine with a British-made engine.
The initial flight trials were carried out with a temporary four wheel undercarriage and tail wheels on the floats, at Portholme and flotation tests also on the local river. The machine then was moved to Shoreham, where it was tested on the River Adur. It was soon moved to Brighton and housed in Volk's hangar, but it sank close inshore in early June and was moved back to Shoreham.
It was possible that some salvaged items were used in the second machine, but since there were so many differences, this seems unlikely.
The wings contained three bays outboard of the tail booms, with a slight overhang of the top wing; within the tail booms the center section bays were smaller. The wings were unstaggered and carried ailerons on the top only.
The aircraft was mounted on each float with three struts only and bracing wires. Each float had a front and rear watertight compartment, between which was an open cockpit for three persons, the pilot seated in front on the starboard side, the passengers being seated side by side behind. The floats were rather like punts with flat undersides, without steps, and with curved top deckings.
The power plant was the most unusual feature of the machine, and consisted of three Gnome rotary engines on a common axis, which drove a separate propeller shaft above them. A U-shaped cowling surrounded the front engine to act as an oil collector. The fuel and oil were carried in a cylindrical tank above the propeller shaft, the fuel and oil being pumped to each engine, which each had their own throttle control.
Power: Three 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries driving a 9ft.l0in. diameter four-bladed propeller, by triple chain at a ratio of 29 to 19.
Data
Span top 45ft 4in (47ft 1 lin The Aero)
Span bottom 44ft 6in
Chord 5ft 8in
Area 505 sq. ft
Area tailplane 25 sq. ft
Area elevators 32 sq. ft
Area rudders 15 sq. ft
Hulls length 15ft
Hulls beam 3ft
Length 29ft 3in
Weight 1,4001b.
Endurance 1 1/2 hr
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RADLEY ENGLAND waterplane No.2
The second version of the Waterplane, launched on 6 August 1913, was so different and appeared so soon after the damage to the first, that it seems to have been a new machine built at Portholme, where the capacity for construction existed. It had a British-made engine and greater endurance, to make it suitable for the Circuit Contest, apart from strengthening and other major changes.
The wings had greater span and area and were now mounted on four splayed struts, closer together, and were connected by a pair of struts, which ran from each bow to the engine bearers. The earlier punt-like floats had been replaced by stronger, clinker-built boat hulls made by the South Coast Yacht Agency, and now accommodated four crew in separate cockpits, with the pilot in the starboard front position as before.
The engine bearers carried the radiator at the front, with a large combined fuel and oil tank holding eighty-two gallons of petrol and eight gallons of oil, between the radiator and the engine.
Serious trouble was found with the engine immediately the trials began and the machine was withdrawn from the Circuit Contest straight away. There were no further reports and Gordon England left to take up other work and later to sue Radley for arrears of salary and expenses. The machine was bought by Pemberton Billing but was not used.
Power: 150hp Sunbeam, eight-cylinder water-cooled vee, geared to drive a 9ft 6in diameter Lang four-bladed propeller at half engine speed
Data
Span top 51ft 7 l/2in
Span bottom 45ft 10in
Chord 5ft 10in
Area 560 sq. ft
Area tailplane 24 sq. ft
Area elevator 35 sq. ft
Area rudders 18 sq. ft
Hulls length 18ft
Hulls beam 2ft 6in
Length 29ft 9in
The second version of the Waterplane, launched on 6 August 1913, was so different and appeared so soon after the damage to the first, that it seems to have been a new machine built at Portholme, where the capacity for construction existed. It had a British-made engine and greater endurance, to make it suitable for the Circuit Contest, apart from strengthening and other major changes.
The wings had greater span and area and were now mounted on four splayed struts, closer together, and were connected by a pair of struts, which ran from each bow to the engine bearers. The earlier punt-like floats had been replaced by stronger, clinker-built boat hulls made by the South Coast Yacht Agency, and now accommodated four crew in separate cockpits, with the pilot in the starboard front position as before.
The engine bearers carried the radiator at the front, with a large combined fuel and oil tank holding eighty-two gallons of petrol and eight gallons of oil, between the radiator and the engine.
Serious trouble was found with the engine immediately the trials began and the machine was withdrawn from the Circuit Contest straight away. There were no further reports and Gordon England left to take up other work and later to sue Radley for arrears of salary and expenses. The machine was bought by Pemberton Billing but was not used.
Power: 150hp Sunbeam, eight-cylinder water-cooled vee, geared to drive a 9ft 6in diameter Lang four-bladed propeller at half engine speed
Data
Span top 51ft 7 l/2in
Span bottom 45ft 10in
Chord 5ft 10in
Area 560 sq. ft
Area tailplane 24 sq. ft
Area elevator 35 sq. ft
Area rudders 18 sq. ft
Hulls length 18ft
Hulls beam 2ft 6in
Length 29ft 9in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RADLEY (& MOORHOUSE) monoplane (James Radley, St. John's St., Huntingdon and William B. Rhodes Moorhouse)
James Radley was one of the leading British pilots of a Bleriot in 1910. After he returned from a successful tour of America at the end of the year, he turned to design and construction and gradually gave up flying. He was joined in this work by W.B. Rhodes Moorhouse, who took on the flying and instructional work, and later was to win the VC in the RFC in 1915.
The first aircraft built was a single-seater with gull wing, which flew at Portholme, Huntingdon for the first time 27 July 1911. The machine was of conventional tractor layout with the fuselage faired to a circular section. The engine was set back in the nose, with the propeller mounted on an extension shaft supported on a front bearing. A four wheeled main undercarriage with two skids, and a tall tail skid, supported the machine on the ground, this providing clearance for the bottom rudder. The tail unit consisted of a long triangular shaped fin, with tailplanes extending along the center of the fuselage sides, together with a one piece elevator and top rudder.
The inboard section of the wing was set with a small dihedral angle but curved downwards from about mid-span; the tips were extended rearwards and could be warped for lateral control.
The machine was later referred to by the names of both Radley and Moorhouse, and was bought by a newly qualified pilot from Brooklands, named Tom Game. He wrote it off in a crash at Huntingdon on 19 January 1912.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
James Radley was one of the leading British pilots of a Bleriot in 1910. After he returned from a successful tour of America at the end of the year, he turned to design and construction and gradually gave up flying. He was joined in this work by W.B. Rhodes Moorhouse, who took on the flying and instructional work, and later was to win the VC in the RFC in 1915.
The first aircraft built was a single-seater with gull wing, which flew at Portholme, Huntingdon for the first time 27 July 1911. The machine was of conventional tractor layout with the fuselage faired to a circular section. The engine was set back in the nose, with the propeller mounted on an extension shaft supported on a front bearing. A four wheeled main undercarriage with two skids, and a tall tail skid, supported the machine on the ground, this providing clearance for the bottom rudder. The tail unit consisted of a long triangular shaped fin, with tailplanes extending along the center of the fuselage sides, together with a one piece elevator and top rudder.
The inboard section of the wing was set with a small dihedral angle but curved downwards from about mid-span; the tips were extended rearwards and could be warped for lateral control.
The machine was later referred to by the names of both Radley and Moorhouse, and was bought by a newly qualified pilot from Brooklands, named Tom Game. He wrote it off in a crash at Huntingdon on 19 January 1912.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Radley monoplane with gullwing was built at Huntingdon in 1911 but was wrecked in January 1912 by the inexperienced purchaser.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RADLEY & MOORHOUSE monoplane, Bleriot type (Portholme, Hunts)
The Bleriot monoplane was a machine that was copied, with variations, by a number of small establishments, when embarking on construction work. The Radley and Moorhouse concern at Portholme was no exception. A two-seater was flying from about October 1911 and was used by Moorhouse to gain his Aviators Certificate No.147 on 7 October 1911. The following month he was testing a new R & M two-seater. This was the machine illustrated on the 14 December 1911 in The Aeroplane.
A machine flown by Moorhouse into third place in the Aerial Derby on 8 June 1912 had changes made for racing. It may have been the same machine, converted into a single-seater, with the addition of a streamlined fairing around the pilot's cockpit on the fuselage top. The wheels had been given fabric covers.
In April 1912 Moorhouse had left Huntingdon and established himself at Brooklands with the single-seater machine and later in the year undertook to fly a French Breguet in the Military Trials. On the flight from France on 4 August 1912, with two passengers, the machine crashed in Kent and took no part in the trials.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
The Bleriot monoplane was a machine that was copied, with variations, by a number of small establishments, when embarking on construction work. The Radley and Moorhouse concern at Portholme was no exception. A two-seater was flying from about October 1911 and was used by Moorhouse to gain his Aviators Certificate No.147 on 7 October 1911. The following month he was testing a new R & M two-seater. This was the machine illustrated on the 14 December 1911 in The Aeroplane.
A machine flown by Moorhouse into third place in the Aerial Derby on 8 June 1912 had changes made for racing. It may have been the same machine, converted into a single-seater, with the addition of a streamlined fairing around the pilot's cockpit on the fuselage top. The wheels had been given fabric covers.
In April 1912 Moorhouse had left Huntingdon and established himself at Brooklands with the single-seater machine and later in the year undertook to fly a French Breguet in the Military Trials. On the flight from France on 4 August 1912, with two passengers, the machine crashed in Kent and took no part in the trials.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ROYAL AIRCRAFT FACTORY (RAF) Farnborough, Hampshire)
This military establishment began life in 1904-1905 on the Farnborough site, after the transfer of the Balloon Factory and School of Ballooning. The early work carried out included the building and flying of airships and kites, which developed into gliders and, from 1906, into powered flying machines. The earliest machines made at Farnborough were those for which Cody and Dunne were primarily responsible, but their work came to an end in March 1909, when all heavier-than-air work was stopped as an economy measure.
The Factory was reorganized as a civilian establishment from October 1909, with authority to carry out experimental work and to repair and maintain the aircraft operated by the Balloon School. It was necessary to acquire aircraft to carry out experimental work, among the first being the machine constructed by Geoffrey de Havilland, who was himself engaged at the same time as an engineer and pilot. The Factory was retitled HM Aircraft Factory in April 1910, and again in April 1912, when it became officially the Royal Aircraft Factory.
The building of a few aircraft for experimental work soon developed into quantity manufacture of a variety of aircraft types and engines. This competition caused considerable disquiet in the aircraft industry, where many firms were suffering from lack of orders. This contentious situation was finally resolved in 1917 by a major reorganization and a return to the original objective, of concentrating on research and experimental work for the benefit of the industry and the flying services. Contracts for various RAF designs were placed with industry from 1912 and made a major contribution to the growth of the industry for wartime production.
BE.1 was nominally the 'reconstruction' of a Voisin, although probably only the engine and little else was used in the new machine. Designed by Geoffrey de Havilland, he flew it for the first time on 4 December 1911.
BE.2 was virtually an identical aircraft, but with an air-cooled engine, perhaps from the Breguet, which was the basis for its 'reconstruction'. This machine flew for the first time on 1 February 1912 and again was flown by de Havilland.
BE.5 began life on 27 June 1912 with a water-cooled ENV engine from a Howard Wright, which was soon changed to an air-cooled Renault, which became the usual engine for other aircraft of a similar type.
BE.6 first flew on 6 September 1912 and may have been fitted briefly with an ENV before a Renault was installed. Later this machine was used for testing an oleo undercarriage with a single skid.
BE.1, 5 and 6 were similar machines to BE.2 and there were five more made at Farnborough in 1913, of the type loosely referred to as BE.2 type aircraft.
These machines were conventional two bay tractor biplanes, with the pilot in the rear seat of the single cockpit, although later a decking between the crew was fitted together with one behind the engine. The latter took the place of the vertical radiator, when the air-cooled engine was fitted. The exhaust pipes of the BE.2 were originally taken inside the fuselage instead of underneath. Differences in the length of the undercarriage skids, and the substitution of equal span wings, were other variations introduced over the period of the aircraft's life. Changes to the rigging of the wings were made during testing, but these were originally unstaggered and without dihedral and with warping control.
The BE.2 was fitted with twin main and tail floats as an amphibian and as a pure seaplane, in which latter form it apparently lifted off when tested on the Fleet Pond.
Power:
60hp Wolseley eight-cylinder water-cooled vee BE.l
60hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee BE.1 and 2 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee BE.5 and 6
70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee BE.2, 6 and others
Data for BE.1. Some variations for other machines.
Span top 38ft 7in
Span bottom 34ft 11 l/2in
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft
Area 374 sq. ft
Area tailplane 52 sq. ft (Originally smaller on BE. 1)
Area elevators 25 sq. ft
Area rudder 12 sq. ft
Length 29ft 6 l/2in
Weight allup 1,700lb.
Height 10ft 2in
BE.1 with Wolesley
Speed range 42-59mph
Climb 155ft per min. to 600ft
BE.2 with 70hp Renault
Speed range 40-70mph
Climb 305ft per min. to 1,000ft
This military establishment began life in 1904-1905 on the Farnborough site, after the transfer of the Balloon Factory and School of Ballooning. The early work carried out included the building and flying of airships and kites, which developed into gliders and, from 1906, into powered flying machines. The earliest machines made at Farnborough were those for which Cody and Dunne were primarily responsible, but their work came to an end in March 1909, when all heavier-than-air work was stopped as an economy measure.
The Factory was reorganized as a civilian establishment from October 1909, with authority to carry out experimental work and to repair and maintain the aircraft operated by the Balloon School. It was necessary to acquire aircraft to carry out experimental work, among the first being the machine constructed by Geoffrey de Havilland, who was himself engaged at the same time as an engineer and pilot. The Factory was retitled HM Aircraft Factory in April 1910, and again in April 1912, when it became officially the Royal Aircraft Factory.
The building of a few aircraft for experimental work soon developed into quantity manufacture of a variety of aircraft types and engines. This competition caused considerable disquiet in the aircraft industry, where many firms were suffering from lack of orders. This contentious situation was finally resolved in 1917 by a major reorganization and a return to the original objective, of concentrating on research and experimental work for the benefit of the industry and the flying services. Contracts for various RAF designs were placed with industry from 1912 and made a major contribution to the growth of the industry for wartime production.
BE.1 was nominally the 'reconstruction' of a Voisin, although probably only the engine and little else was used in the new machine. Designed by Geoffrey de Havilland, he flew it for the first time on 4 December 1911.
BE.2 was virtually an identical aircraft, but with an air-cooled engine, perhaps from the Breguet, which was the basis for its 'reconstruction'. This machine flew for the first time on 1 February 1912 and again was flown by de Havilland.
BE.5 began life on 27 June 1912 with a water-cooled ENV engine from a Howard Wright, which was soon changed to an air-cooled Renault, which became the usual engine for other aircraft of a similar type.
BE.6 first flew on 6 September 1912 and may have been fitted briefly with an ENV before a Renault was installed. Later this machine was used for testing an oleo undercarriage with a single skid.
BE.1, 5 and 6 were similar machines to BE.2 and there were five more made at Farnborough in 1913, of the type loosely referred to as BE.2 type aircraft.
These machines were conventional two bay tractor biplanes, with the pilot in the rear seat of the single cockpit, although later a decking between the crew was fitted together with one behind the engine. The latter took the place of the vertical radiator, when the air-cooled engine was fitted. The exhaust pipes of the BE.2 were originally taken inside the fuselage instead of underneath. Differences in the length of the undercarriage skids, and the substitution of equal span wings, were other variations introduced over the period of the aircraft's life. Changes to the rigging of the wings were made during testing, but these were originally unstaggered and without dihedral and with warping control.
The BE.2 was fitted with twin main and tail floats as an amphibian and as a pure seaplane, in which latter form it apparently lifted off when tested on the Fleet Pond.
Power:
60hp Wolseley eight-cylinder water-cooled vee BE.l
60hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee BE.1 and 2 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee BE.5 and 6
70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee BE.2, 6 and others
Data for BE.1. Some variations for other machines.
Span top 38ft 7in
Span bottom 34ft 11 l/2in
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft
Area 374 sq. ft
Area tailplane 52 sq. ft (Originally smaller on BE. 1)
Area elevators 25 sq. ft
Area rudder 12 sq. ft
Length 29ft 6 l/2in
Weight allup 1,700lb.
Height 10ft 2in
BE.1 with Wolesley
Speed range 42-59mph
Climb 155ft per min. to 600ft
BE.2 with 70hp Renault
Speed range 40-70mph
Climb 305ft per min. to 1,000ft
This photograph of the B.E.I, taken on Farnborough Common, bears the contemporary caption 'The Silent Army Aeroplane'. The wheel tracks demonstrate the machine's impressively small ground turning circle. RAF BE.2 was also fitted with unequal span wings but had a Renault aircooled engine.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SE.1 biplane (Santos Experimental)
The 'reconstruction' of a Bleriot XII monoplane was the basis for a 'canard' biplane identified as SE. 1, due to its similarity in layout to the biplane, Type 14bis, of Santos Dumont. in which he made the first flight of a powered heavier-than-air machine in Europe.
This was the first original design from the Aircraft Factory after the reorganization, which followed the discontinuing of the work of Cody and Dunne under Col. Capper, the aircraft making its appearance in June 1911. After the repair of minor damage, which occurred when taxiing on 7 June 1911, the aircraft was flown the following day for about a mile. Geoffrey de Havilland was the pilot and largely responsible for the design, although Mervyn O'Gorman, the Superintendent and F.M. Green, the Chief Engineer of the Factory, exerted their influence on various aspects. Many changes were made in the course of testing the machine in June and July to improve the handling, particularly the tendency to sideslip.
The aeroplane that emerged from the Factory was rather different to earlier concepts outlined by O'Gorman in March 1911, and other sources in the technical press. It had a two bay wing structure, the top wing slightly greater in span than the bottom, with lateral control by warping sections in the top wings. Control in pitch was by a divided elevator mounted at the nose of the nacelle. The machine was mounted on a twin skid undercarriage with two wheels, on a rubber cord sprung axle, and with small tail skids at the ends of the main skids.
Power was provided by the ENV engine from the Bleriot, which drove a pusher propeller at two-thirds engine speed, through a chain and shaft. The engine was cooled by radiators mounted on either side of the nacelle, alongside the pilot's position.
The separate wire braced tail booms carried rudders of approximately the height of the wing gap. The boom lengths were shortened early in the trials and were planned to be lengthened again later. A supplementary nose mounted rudder was fitted at one stage and the fabric covering of the nacelle was temporarily removed without improvement in the yawing plane. Also the foreplane was later changed to provide a fixed portion with separate elevators.
The position of the wheels was varied and this change was accompanied by the deletion of the small tail skids, which were replaced by a tall sprung nose skid and additional vee-struts connecting the skids to the lower longerons and wing spars.
Despite these and possibly other alterations, de Havilland still regarded the machine as difficult to handle. However, on 18 August 1911, Lt. Ridge the Assistant Superintendent an inexperienced pilot, insisted on being allowed to fly the machine, which side slipped into the ground. Ridge succumbed from his injuries and the SE.l was destroyed.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled driving a two-bladed propeller by chain and shaft at 2/3rds engine speed
Data
Span top 38ft
Span bottom 36ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft
Area 382 sq. ft
Length 29ft short booms
Height lift 6in
Foreplane span 18ft 4in
Foreplane chord 4ft
Foreplane area 64 sq. ft
Weight 1,220lb.
Weight allup 1,640lb.
Max speed 55mph
The 'reconstruction' of a Bleriot XII monoplane was the basis for a 'canard' biplane identified as SE. 1, due to its similarity in layout to the biplane, Type 14bis, of Santos Dumont. in which he made the first flight of a powered heavier-than-air machine in Europe.
This was the first original design from the Aircraft Factory after the reorganization, which followed the discontinuing of the work of Cody and Dunne under Col. Capper, the aircraft making its appearance in June 1911. After the repair of minor damage, which occurred when taxiing on 7 June 1911, the aircraft was flown the following day for about a mile. Geoffrey de Havilland was the pilot and largely responsible for the design, although Mervyn O'Gorman, the Superintendent and F.M. Green, the Chief Engineer of the Factory, exerted their influence on various aspects. Many changes were made in the course of testing the machine in June and July to improve the handling, particularly the tendency to sideslip.
The aeroplane that emerged from the Factory was rather different to earlier concepts outlined by O'Gorman in March 1911, and other sources in the technical press. It had a two bay wing structure, the top wing slightly greater in span than the bottom, with lateral control by warping sections in the top wings. Control in pitch was by a divided elevator mounted at the nose of the nacelle. The machine was mounted on a twin skid undercarriage with two wheels, on a rubber cord sprung axle, and with small tail skids at the ends of the main skids.
Power was provided by the ENV engine from the Bleriot, which drove a pusher propeller at two-thirds engine speed, through a chain and shaft. The engine was cooled by radiators mounted on either side of the nacelle, alongside the pilot's position.
The separate wire braced tail booms carried rudders of approximately the height of the wing gap. The boom lengths were shortened early in the trials and were planned to be lengthened again later. A supplementary nose mounted rudder was fitted at one stage and the fabric covering of the nacelle was temporarily removed without improvement in the yawing plane. Also the foreplane was later changed to provide a fixed portion with separate elevators.
The position of the wheels was varied and this change was accompanied by the deletion of the small tail skids, which were replaced by a tall sprung nose skid and additional vee-struts connecting the skids to the lower longerons and wing spars.
Despite these and possibly other alterations, de Havilland still regarded the machine as difficult to handle. However, on 18 August 1911, Lt. Ridge the Assistant Superintendent an inexperienced pilot, insisted on being allowed to fly the machine, which side slipped into the ground. Ridge succumbed from his injuries and the SE.l was destroyed.
Power: 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled driving a two-bladed propeller by chain and shaft at 2/3rds engine speed
Data
Span top 38ft
Span bottom 36ft
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft
Area 382 sq. ft
Length 29ft short booms
Height lift 6in
Foreplane span 18ft 4in
Foreplane chord 4ft
Foreplane area 64 sq. ft
Weight 1,220lb.
Weight allup 1,640lb.
Max speed 55mph
The S.E.1 in late June/early July 1911, after the addition of a long skid beneath the nose. It underwear extensive modification and development. RAF SE.l first flown in June 1911 was destroyed in a fatal crash which killed Lt. Ridge.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BE.1 was nominally the 'reconstruction' of a Voisin, although probably only the engine and little else was used in the new machine. Designed by Geoffrey de Havilland, he flew it for the first time on 4 December 1911.
BE.2 was virtually an identical aircraft, but with an air-cooled engine, perhaps from the Breguet, which was the basis for its 'reconstruction'. This machine flew for the first time on 1 February 1912 and again was flown by de Havilland.
BE.1, 5 and 6 were similar machines to BE.2 and there were five more made at Farnborough in 1913, of the type loosely referred to as BE.2 type aircraft.
These machines were conventional two bay tractor biplanes, with the pilot in the rear seat of the single cockpit, although later a decking between the crew was fitted together with one behind the engine. The latter took the place of the vertical radiator, when the air-cooled engine was fitted. The exhaust pipes of the BE.2 were originally taken inside the fuselage instead of underneath. Differences in the length of the undercarriage skids, and the substitution of equal span wings, were other variations introduced over the period of the aircraft's life. Changes to the rigging of the wings were made during testing, but these were originally unstaggered and without dihedral and with warping control.
The BE.2 was fitted with twin main and tail floats as an amphibian and as a pure seaplane, in which latter form it apparently lifted off when tested on the Fleet Pond.
Power:
60hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee BE.1 and 2 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee BE.5 and 6
70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee BE.2, 6 and others
Data for BE.2 with 70hp Renault
Speed range 40-70mph
Climb 305ft per min. to 1,000ft
BE.2a and BE.2b biplanes
The BE.2a was evolved from the previous variants of the BE.2 in the middle of 1912, into a machine suitable for use by the Military Wing, and orders were placed with a number of firms. Approaching one hundred BE.2a aircraft were built.
The type inherited the unequal span wing initially, although the majority were fitted with wings of equal span and a new section, rigged with reduced incidence. The aircraft incorporated the front and rear deckings added to previous machines. A semicircular tail plane was standardized which had reduced area.
Individual machines were used at Famborough to test various new installations in connection with research into stability, such as triangular fins above the center section, increased width at the top of the interplane struts, and alternative tailplanes.
A BE.2a No.218, converted to a single-seater, with an extra fuel tank in the front cockpit, flew 560 miles nonstop in 7hr 20min on 22 November 1913, flown by Capt. Longcroft. On the 13 December 1913, Capt. Salmond established a British height record, by reaching an altitude of 13,140 feet.
The BE.2b gave the crew better protection, by changes to the top decking and embodied revised control runs, but was basically the same aircraft as the BE.2a. The BE.2b was developed in early 1914 and was ordered in considerable numbers from contractors, the last deliveries being made to the RFC, the prime user, in February 1917. The development of the basic BE.2 series was continued in 1915 and later.
The earliest manufacturers of the BE.2a were Vickers, Sir W.G. Armstrong-Whitworth, British & Colonial (Bristol), Coventry Ordnance Works (COW), S.E. Saunders, Handley Page and Hewlett & Blondeau. Some of these firms continued to make the BE.2b and later versions.
Power: 70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 8ft 10in diameter four-bladed propeller
Data
Span 36ft 11 in (Early aircraft, top 37ft 7in, bottom 34ft 10 l/2in)
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft
Area 376 sq. ft (Early aircraft 357 sq. ft)
Area elevators 25 sq. ft
Area rudder 12 sq. ft
Area tailplane 34 sq. ft
Length 28ft 4in (29ft 6 l/2in; long skids)
Height 10ft 2in
Weight 1,2741b.
Weight allup 1,600lb.
Max speed 70 mph
Climb to 3,000ft 9 min
Endurance 3hr
BE.2 was virtually an identical aircraft, but with an air-cooled engine, perhaps from the Breguet, which was the basis for its 'reconstruction'. This machine flew for the first time on 1 February 1912 and again was flown by de Havilland.
BE.1, 5 and 6 were similar machines to BE.2 and there were five more made at Farnborough in 1913, of the type loosely referred to as BE.2 type aircraft.
These machines were conventional two bay tractor biplanes, with the pilot in the rear seat of the single cockpit, although later a decking between the crew was fitted together with one behind the engine. The latter took the place of the vertical radiator, when the air-cooled engine was fitted. The exhaust pipes of the BE.2 were originally taken inside the fuselage instead of underneath. Differences in the length of the undercarriage skids, and the substitution of equal span wings, were other variations introduced over the period of the aircraft's life. Changes to the rigging of the wings were made during testing, but these were originally unstaggered and without dihedral and with warping control.
The BE.2 was fitted with twin main and tail floats as an amphibian and as a pure seaplane, in which latter form it apparently lifted off when tested on the Fleet Pond.
Power:
60hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee BE.1 and 2 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee BE.5 and 6
70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee BE.2, 6 and others
Data for BE.2 with 70hp Renault
Speed range 40-70mph
Climb 305ft per min. to 1,000ft
BE.2a and BE.2b biplanes
The BE.2a was evolved from the previous variants of the BE.2 in the middle of 1912, into a machine suitable for use by the Military Wing, and orders were placed with a number of firms. Approaching one hundred BE.2a aircraft were built.
The type inherited the unequal span wing initially, although the majority were fitted with wings of equal span and a new section, rigged with reduced incidence. The aircraft incorporated the front and rear deckings added to previous machines. A semicircular tail plane was standardized which had reduced area.
Individual machines were used at Famborough to test various new installations in connection with research into stability, such as triangular fins above the center section, increased width at the top of the interplane struts, and alternative tailplanes.
A BE.2a No.218, converted to a single-seater, with an extra fuel tank in the front cockpit, flew 560 miles nonstop in 7hr 20min on 22 November 1913, flown by Capt. Longcroft. On the 13 December 1913, Capt. Salmond established a British height record, by reaching an altitude of 13,140 feet.
The BE.2b gave the crew better protection, by changes to the top decking and embodied revised control runs, but was basically the same aircraft as the BE.2a. The BE.2b was developed in early 1914 and was ordered in considerable numbers from contractors, the last deliveries being made to the RFC, the prime user, in February 1917. The development of the basic BE.2 series was continued in 1915 and later.
The earliest manufacturers of the BE.2a were Vickers, Sir W.G. Armstrong-Whitworth, British & Colonial (Bristol), Coventry Ordnance Works (COW), S.E. Saunders, Handley Page and Hewlett & Blondeau. Some of these firms continued to make the BE.2b and later versions.
Power: 70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a 8ft 10in diameter four-bladed propeller
Data
Span 36ft 11 in (Early aircraft, top 37ft 7in, bottom 34ft 10 l/2in)
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft
Area 376 sq. ft (Early aircraft 357 sq. ft)
Area elevators 25 sq. ft
Area rudder 12 sq. ft
Area tailplane 34 sq. ft
Length 28ft 4in (29ft 6 l/2in; long skids)
Height 10ft 2in
Weight 1,2741b.
Weight allup 1,600lb.
Max speed 70 mph
Climb to 3,000ft 9 min
Endurance 3hr
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BE.3 and BE.4 biplanes
These two machines, designed by John Kenworthy, were structurally identical even though the BE.3 was allegedly the 'reconstruction' of a Paulhan biplane, No.F2 and BE.4 of a Bristol Box-kite No.F.9.
The design was of a two-seat tractor biplane, similar to the BE. 1 and 2, but with staggered wings and a rotary engine. The fuselage, which was wide and deep to accommodate the rotary engine, had one cockpit for the two crew in tandem and was mounted on short struts above the lower wing. The tailplane and elevator were in one piece, with a balanced rudder above and no fin. The wings were of equal span and control was by warping.
BE.3. was flown by G. de Havilland for the first time on 3 May 1912 and was passed to No.3 Squadron RFC on 13 May 1912 becoming No.203. It continued in use to the end of 1914.
BE.4 was also flown by de Havilland for the first time on 24 June 1912 and was handed over to the RFC on 8 May 1912, becoming No.204. The original 50hp Gnome was replaced with a 70hp and again with an 80hp engine. The aircraft was involved in a fatal crash on 11 March 1914, when the rudder post broke, resulting in an ugly new design with a fin being introduced. This was fitted to No.203 and the three other machines of the type, which were also built by contractors, namely Nos.303,417 and 418.
Power: 50, 70 & 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries driving two-bladed or occasionally four-bladed propellers.
Data
Span 39ft 6in
Chord 5 ft 6in
Length 27ft 3in
BE.7 biplane
Only one of these high-powered versions of the BE.3/4 was built, and it began life with a first flight of twenty minutes flown by de Havilland on 28 February 1912. The machine became Serial No.408 later 438 at the Central Flying School, where it was in use to at least the end of 1913. On 2 May 1913 it established a British altitude record of 8,400ft. with pilot and two passengers aboard.
The changes made to the BE.3/4 design were seemingly only those necessary to accommodate the two-row 140hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder rotary, primarily the reduction of the front fuselage length by one bay, to adjust the position of the center of gravity.
These two machines, designed by John Kenworthy, were structurally identical even though the BE.3 was allegedly the 'reconstruction' of a Paulhan biplane, No.F2 and BE.4 of a Bristol Box-kite No.F.9.
The design was of a two-seat tractor biplane, similar to the BE. 1 and 2, but with staggered wings and a rotary engine. The fuselage, which was wide and deep to accommodate the rotary engine, had one cockpit for the two crew in tandem and was mounted on short struts above the lower wing. The tailplane and elevator were in one piece, with a balanced rudder above and no fin. The wings were of equal span and control was by warping.
BE.3. was flown by G. de Havilland for the first time on 3 May 1912 and was passed to No.3 Squadron RFC on 13 May 1912 becoming No.203. It continued in use to the end of 1914.
BE.4 was also flown by de Havilland for the first time on 24 June 1912 and was handed over to the RFC on 8 May 1912, becoming No.204. The original 50hp Gnome was replaced with a 70hp and again with an 80hp engine. The aircraft was involved in a fatal crash on 11 March 1914, when the rudder post broke, resulting in an ugly new design with a fin being introduced. This was fitted to No.203 and the three other machines of the type, which were also built by contractors, namely Nos.303,417 and 418.
Power: 50, 70 & 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries driving two-bladed or occasionally four-bladed propellers.
Data
Span 39ft 6in
Chord 5 ft 6in
Length 27ft 3in
BE.7 biplane
Only one of these high-powered versions of the BE.3/4 was built, and it began life with a first flight of twenty minutes flown by de Havilland on 28 February 1912. The machine became Serial No.408 later 438 at the Central Flying School, where it was in use to at least the end of 1913. On 2 May 1913 it established a British altitude record of 8,400ft. with pilot and two passengers aboard.
The changes made to the BE.3/4 design were seemingly only those necessary to accommodate the two-row 140hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder rotary, primarily the reduction of the front fuselage length by one bay, to adjust the position of the center of gravity.
RAF BE.3 was the first of a small number of rotary-powered aircraft supplied to the RFC in 1912-1913.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FE.2 1911 and 1913 versions
Two distinct versions of this aircraft were built, the first of which made its first attempt at flight on 16 August 1911, which was aborted due to engine failure.
1911 version. This machine was a typical pusher biplane with a nacelle for the crew with single acting ailerons on all four wings, which consisted of two bays outboard of the tail boom struts.
The tailbooms comprised three bays and originally carried a biplane tail with single rudder between; the lower tailplane was soon removed and the rudder area increased by making it taller. The two wheel and twin skid undercarriage was mounted below the wings.
In April 1912 the FE.2 was tested on Fleet Pond as a seaplane, with large central float fitted under the undercarriage skids, together with a tail float and small wingtip floats. A new and more powerful engine was fitted, enabling a passenger to be carried successfully.
After reconversion to wheel undercarriage, limited tests were carried out with a Maxim gun fitted to the front cockpit.
Power: 50 and 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary with four-bladed propeller
Data
Span 33ft
Weight allup 1,2001b.
Area 340 sq. ft
Max speed 48 mph
Length 28ft
Climb with passenger 140 ft per min
1913 version. The second version of the machine was quite different from the first, although some parts of the earlier machine may have been used in its construction. It does not appear on the RAE list as a new machine in 1913.
The center section, enclosed within the tailboom struts, was broad; the outer wings, reported to be of BE.2a origin, were of single bay type with a large unsupported outer section with rounded tips and warping control. A deeper nacelle than its predecessor's, was mounted on a similar two wheel and twin skid undercarriage, but with mounting struts forward of the wings.
The tail booms tapered inwards more acutely and the top members sloped down more steeply. The tailplane, with divided elevators, was mounted on the top members and braced with struts to the lower members. A large unbalanced rudder was fitted but no fin. This FE.2 was wrecked on 2 October 1914, when being flown by R. Kemp, the passenger E.T Haynes being killed in the crash.
Power: 70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee with four-bladed propeller
Data
Span 42ft
Area 425 sq. ft
Length 30ft
Weight allup 1,865 1b.
Max speed 67 mph
Climb 330ft per min initially
Ceiling 5,500ft
Two distinct versions of this aircraft were built, the first of which made its first attempt at flight on 16 August 1911, which was aborted due to engine failure.
1911 version. This machine was a typical pusher biplane with a nacelle for the crew with single acting ailerons on all four wings, which consisted of two bays outboard of the tail boom struts.
The tailbooms comprised three bays and originally carried a biplane tail with single rudder between; the lower tailplane was soon removed and the rudder area increased by making it taller. The two wheel and twin skid undercarriage was mounted below the wings.
In April 1912 the FE.2 was tested on Fleet Pond as a seaplane, with large central float fitted under the undercarriage skids, together with a tail float and small wingtip floats. A new and more powerful engine was fitted, enabling a passenger to be carried successfully.
After reconversion to wheel undercarriage, limited tests were carried out with a Maxim gun fitted to the front cockpit.
Power: 50 and 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary with four-bladed propeller
Data
Span 33ft
Weight allup 1,2001b.
Area 340 sq. ft
Max speed 48 mph
Length 28ft
Climb with passenger 140 ft per min
1913 version. The second version of the machine was quite different from the first, although some parts of the earlier machine may have been used in its construction. It does not appear on the RAE list as a new machine in 1913.
The center section, enclosed within the tailboom struts, was broad; the outer wings, reported to be of BE.2a origin, were of single bay type with a large unsupported outer section with rounded tips and warping control. A deeper nacelle than its predecessor's, was mounted on a similar two wheel and twin skid undercarriage, but with mounting struts forward of the wings.
The tail booms tapered inwards more acutely and the top members sloped down more steeply. The tailplane, with divided elevators, was mounted on the top members and braced with struts to the lower members. A large unbalanced rudder was fitted but no fin. This FE.2 was wrecked on 2 October 1914, when being flown by R. Kemp, the passenger E.T Haynes being killed in the crash.
Power: 70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee with four-bladed propeller
Data
Span 42ft
Area 425 sq. ft
Length 30ft
Weight allup 1,865 1b.
Max speed 67 mph
Climb 330ft per min initially
Ceiling 5,500ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BE.8 biplane
Kenworthy was responsible for the development of the BE.3/4 type into the BE.8, a similar rotary-powered tractor biplane, which was first flown in August 1913. Two prototypes were built at the RAF, and were probably the machines delivered to the CFS, Nos.423-424 in November 1913. Subsequent machines were manufactured by Vickers, Bristols and the Coventry Ordnance Works, to a total of twenty four.
The main changes from the BE.3/4 included mounting the lower wings directly to the fuselage bottom longerons, and the fitting of a BE.2 type rudder. The two prototypes had one large cockpit for the two occupants, but production aircraft incorporated a central decking, a triangular fin and a four-bladed propeller.
Although some aircraft went to France with squadrons, the BE.8 saw little operational use and was mainly used for training. A further development, the BE.8a, appeared in 1915 with alternative engines, ailerons replacing warping, larger fins and other improvements adopted from the BE.2c.
Kenworthy was responsible for the development of the BE.3/4 type into the BE.8, a similar rotary-powered tractor biplane, which was first flown in August 1913. Two prototypes were built at the RAF, and were probably the machines delivered to the CFS, Nos.423-424 in November 1913. Subsequent machines were manufactured by Vickers, Bristols and the Coventry Ordnance Works, to a total of twenty four.
The main changes from the BE.3/4 included mounting the lower wings directly to the fuselage bottom longerons, and the fitting of a BE.2 type rudder. The two prototypes had one large cockpit for the two occupants, but production aircraft incorporated a central decking, a triangular fin and a four-bladed propeller.
Although some aircraft went to France with squadrons, the BE.8 saw little operational use and was mainly used for training. A further development, the BE.8a, appeared in 1915 with alternative engines, ailerons replacing warping, larger fins and other improvements adopted from the BE.2c.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BS.1 (Bleriot Scout) Biplane
Geoffrey de Havilland, assisted by H.P. Folland and S.J. Waters, was responsible for the design of the BS.l. The aircraft was a scaled down BE.3 with single bay wings, and was the first ever known as a 'Scout', which later evolved into the traditional single-seater fighter.
The circular engine cowling was cut away at the bottom and also allowed space for a 140hp two-row rotary, although the single-row Gnome only was fitted. The forward part of the fuselage was constructed on four longerons to a point aft of the cockpit, from where it continued to the tail as a wooden monocoque.
Lateral control was by wing warping; the tail unit consisted of a semicircular tailplane with one piece elevator. The small balanced rudder was due to be replaced by a larger unit, at de Havilland's suggestion, but before this could take place the machine spun into the ground. The machine was wrecked and de Havilland was severely injured. The aircraft was rebuilt in a new form as the SE.2.
Power: 100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled two-row rotary
Data
Span 27ft 6in
Length 20ft 6in
Weight allup 1,232 lb.
Height 8ft 10in
Speed range 51-92 mph
Climb 800 ft per min
BS.2 biplane.
This was an aircraft which was proposed, but not built. It was to be larger than the BS.l, and to have a welded steel tubular fuselage structure.
Geoffrey de Havilland, assisted by H.P. Folland and S.J. Waters, was responsible for the design of the BS.l. The aircraft was a scaled down BE.3 with single bay wings, and was the first ever known as a 'Scout', which later evolved into the traditional single-seater fighter.
The circular engine cowling was cut away at the bottom and also allowed space for a 140hp two-row rotary, although the single-row Gnome only was fitted. The forward part of the fuselage was constructed on four longerons to a point aft of the cockpit, from where it continued to the tail as a wooden monocoque.
Lateral control was by wing warping; the tail unit consisted of a semicircular tailplane with one piece elevator. The small balanced rudder was due to be replaced by a larger unit, at de Havilland's suggestion, but before this could take place the machine spun into the ground. The machine was wrecked and de Havilland was severely injured. The aircraft was rebuilt in a new form as the SE.2.
Power: 100hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder air-cooled two-row rotary
Data
Span 27ft 6in
Length 20ft 6in
Weight allup 1,232 lb.
Height 8ft 10in
Speed range 51-92 mph
Climb 800 ft per min
BS.2 biplane.
This was an aircraft which was proposed, but not built. It was to be larger than the BS.l, and to have a welded steel tubular fuselage structure.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FE.3 biplane (AE.l Armed Experimental)
This machine was a two-seater pusher designed, under the leadership of S.J. Waters, to carry a one-pounder COW gun. The testing, by de Havilland and Kemp, revealed the inadequate rigidity of the tail and flying was abandoned. The effect of the recoil of the gun was assessed with the machine suspended from a hangar roof.
The water-cooled engine was mounted at the front of the nacelle and drove a four-bladed propeller through a shaft and enclosed chain. A circular air intake in the nose provided air to a radiator in front of the crew, the air escaping through louvered panels in the sides.
The tail unit was mounted on a single tubular boom, with a support for the extension shaft behind the propeller, the tail itself being braced by wires to the wings and undercarriage. Triangular fins, above and below the boom, formed a post for the tall rudder; a large semicircular tailplane and divided elevators completed the tail unit.
The wings were of unequal span, with the top overhang braced by struts. Lateral control was by warping. Tests of the machine, which was built in 1913, were not continued, but a successor of the same general configuration followed in 1914.
Power: 100hp Chenu six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 40ft
Chord 5ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 436 1/2 sq. ft
Length 29ft 3 In
Height 11ft 3in
Weight 1,4001b.
Weight allup 2,080lb.
Speed 75mph
Rate of climb 350ft per min to 1,000ft
Ceiling 5,000ft
FE.6 biplane
The FE.6 was designed and built in 1914 as a successor to the FE.3, to carry on the work of investigating the requirements for the carnage of the one pounder COW gun. Frank Goodden flew the aircraft on 14 November 1914 for the first time, but the flight resulted in damage which, although not severe, was not repaired, indicating problems of a more fundamental nature.
The aircraft was a heavier and larger version of the FE.3 and was of the same basic layout. The tail boom was more substantial and was not braced externally, and had space to run the tail surface controls internally. The boom would, of necessity, have been firmly anchored back to the structure of the aircraft. The gun was mounted above the lip of the front cockpit to fire forward, but was probably never actually fired.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline watercooled
Data
Span 49ft 4in
Chord 6ft
Area 542 sq. ft
Length 29ft 6in
Height 15ft
Weight 2,000 lb.
Weight allup 2,630lb.
This machine was a two-seater pusher designed, under the leadership of S.J. Waters, to carry a one-pounder COW gun. The testing, by de Havilland and Kemp, revealed the inadequate rigidity of the tail and flying was abandoned. The effect of the recoil of the gun was assessed with the machine suspended from a hangar roof.
The water-cooled engine was mounted at the front of the nacelle and drove a four-bladed propeller through a shaft and enclosed chain. A circular air intake in the nose provided air to a radiator in front of the crew, the air escaping through louvered panels in the sides.
The tail unit was mounted on a single tubular boom, with a support for the extension shaft behind the propeller, the tail itself being braced by wires to the wings and undercarriage. Triangular fins, above and below the boom, formed a post for the tall rudder; a large semicircular tailplane and divided elevators completed the tail unit.
The wings were of unequal span, with the top overhang braced by struts. Lateral control was by warping. Tests of the machine, which was built in 1913, were not continued, but a successor of the same general configuration followed in 1914.
Power: 100hp Chenu six-cylinder inline water-cooled.
Data
Span 40ft
Chord 5ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 436 1/2 sq. ft
Length 29ft 3 In
Height 11ft 3in
Weight 1,4001b.
Weight allup 2,080lb.
Speed 75mph
Rate of climb 350ft per min to 1,000ft
Ceiling 5,000ft
FE.6 biplane
The FE.6 was designed and built in 1914 as a successor to the FE.3, to carry on the work of investigating the requirements for the carnage of the one pounder COW gun. Frank Goodden flew the aircraft on 14 November 1914 for the first time, but the flight resulted in damage which, although not severe, was not repaired, indicating problems of a more fundamental nature.
The aircraft was a heavier and larger version of the FE.3 and was of the same basic layout. The tail boom was more substantial and was not braced externally, and had space to run the tail surface controls internally. The boom would, of necessity, have been firmly anchored back to the structure of the aircraft. The gun was mounted above the lip of the front cockpit to fire forward, but was probably never actually fired.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline watercooled
Data
Span 49ft 4in
Chord 6ft
Area 542 sq. ft
Length 29ft 6in
Height 15ft
Weight 2,000 lb.
Weight allup 2,630lb.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RE.1 biplane (Reconnaissance Experimental)
The first of two prototypes, serial No.607 was flown in May 1913, the second No.608 following in September 1913. Both were used for test flying at Farnborough, mostly by E.T Busk, in connection with improvements to aircraft stability, although the second machine was transferred to the RFC in March 1914.
The RE. 1 was a single bay biplane, which in its original form, had staggered wings with warping control. The fuselage incorporated some steel tube in addition to wood in its structure and was mounted on a two wheeled undercarriage by four struts, a neater arrangement than that of the BE.2, from which the aircraft was derived. The tail unit was conventional, with tailplane, fin, rudder and divided elevators. However, changes were made to a number of features during development. For a time on No.608, four small triangular fins were fitted above the top wings. Wings of greater span with ailerons were fitted, the stagger reduced and the dihedral varied. The fin was reduced and a larger aerodynamically balanced rudder fitted, together with a new tailplane with straight leading edge, square tips and new elevators to match. Provision for armor plate was made in the basic design and may have been fitted.
Power: 70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a four-bladed propeller
Data
Span 34ft later 36ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Area 316 sq. ft (later 328 sq. ft)
Weight 1.000lb.
Weight allup 1,580 lb.
Speed range 48-78 mph
Initial climb 600 ft per min
The first of two prototypes, serial No.607 was flown in May 1913, the second No.608 following in September 1913. Both were used for test flying at Farnborough, mostly by E.T Busk, in connection with improvements to aircraft stability, although the second machine was transferred to the RFC in March 1914.
The RE. 1 was a single bay biplane, which in its original form, had staggered wings with warping control. The fuselage incorporated some steel tube in addition to wood in its structure and was mounted on a two wheeled undercarriage by four struts, a neater arrangement than that of the BE.2, from which the aircraft was derived. The tail unit was conventional, with tailplane, fin, rudder and divided elevators. However, changes were made to a number of features during development. For a time on No.608, four small triangular fins were fitted above the top wings. Wings of greater span with ailerons were fitted, the stagger reduced and the dihedral varied. The fin was reduced and a larger aerodynamically balanced rudder fitted, together with a new tailplane with straight leading edge, square tips and new elevators to match. Provision for armor plate was made in the basic design and may have been fitted.
Power: 70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee driving a four-bladed propeller
Data
Span 34ft later 36ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Area 316 sq. ft (later 328 sq. ft)
Weight 1.000lb.
Weight allup 1,580 lb.
Speed range 48-78 mph
Initial climb 600 ft per min
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RE.2 and HRE.2 biplane (Hydro Reconnaissance Experimental)
Only one of this type was built, incorporating features of the RE. 1 and some from the BE aircraft. The machine was a two bay biplane with warping and staggered wings, a tall aerodynamically balanced rudder and one piece elevator and no fin. The undercarriage was derived from the RE.l as, no doubt, was much of the fuselage design.
The RE.2 was flown first as a land plane on 1 July 1913, and was then converted to the HRE.2 hydroplane. The twin main floats had steps and the tail float mounted a water rudder. A triangular fin and tall rudder were fitted.
The first attempts to take off from Fleet Pond were unsuccessful. A 100hp engine was then fitted and wings with ailerons, but despite the increased power, the aircraft would not rise and finally hit the bank, wrecking the floats and causing other damage, when it overturned. After repair, the machine reverted to a land undercarriage and was passed to the RNAS as No. 17 from August 1914, until it was wrecked on 10 January 1915.
Power:
70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee
100hp Renault twelve-cylinder air-cooled vee
Data
Span 45ft 3 l/2in
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft 3 l/2in
Area 498 sq. ft
Length 32ft 3in
Height 12ft 2in
Max speed
60 mph (70hp)
75 mph (100hp)
Climb to 3,000ft 5 min
Endurance 4 1/2hr
RE.3 biplane
This aircraft was the same as the RE.2 in its final form, but was fitted with an Austro-Daimler engine. It first flew in November 1913, but was wrecked at Farnborough, as a result of engine failure, when being flown by E.T. Busk on 27 September 1914.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline watercooled
Data
Span 45ft 3 l/2in
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft 3 l/2in
Area 498 sq. ft
Length 32ft 3 in
Height 12ft 2in
RE.4 biplane
This aircraft, intended to operate from small fields, was not built. It would have been developed from the RE.2/3, with unequal span wings and fitted with a 120hp Austro-Daimler engine or the large Gnome fourteen-cylinder two-row rotary as used in the SE.4.
Only one of this type was built, incorporating features of the RE. 1 and some from the BE aircraft. The machine was a two bay biplane with warping and staggered wings, a tall aerodynamically balanced rudder and one piece elevator and no fin. The undercarriage was derived from the RE.l as, no doubt, was much of the fuselage design.
The RE.2 was flown first as a land plane on 1 July 1913, and was then converted to the HRE.2 hydroplane. The twin main floats had steps and the tail float mounted a water rudder. A triangular fin and tall rudder were fitted.
The first attempts to take off from Fleet Pond were unsuccessful. A 100hp engine was then fitted and wings with ailerons, but despite the increased power, the aircraft would not rise and finally hit the bank, wrecking the floats and causing other damage, when it overturned. After repair, the machine reverted to a land undercarriage and was passed to the RNAS as No. 17 from August 1914, until it was wrecked on 10 January 1915.
Power:
70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee
100hp Renault twelve-cylinder air-cooled vee
Data
Span 45ft 3 l/2in
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft 3 l/2in
Area 498 sq. ft
Length 32ft 3in
Height 12ft 2in
Max speed
60 mph (70hp)
75 mph (100hp)
Climb to 3,000ft 5 min
Endurance 4 1/2hr
RE.3 biplane
This aircraft was the same as the RE.2 in its final form, but was fitted with an Austro-Daimler engine. It first flew in November 1913, but was wrecked at Farnborough, as a result of engine failure, when being flown by E.T. Busk on 27 September 1914.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler six-cylinder inline watercooled
Data
Span 45ft 3 l/2in
Chord 6ft
Gap 6ft 3 l/2in
Area 498 sq. ft
Length 32ft 3 in
Height 12ft 2in
RE.4 biplane
This aircraft, intended to operate from small fields, was not built. It would have been developed from the RE.2/3, with unequal span wings and fitted with a 120hp Austro-Daimler engine or the large Gnome fourteen-cylinder two-row rotary as used in the SE.4.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SE.2 biplane (Scouting Experimental)
The BS.1, which crashed on 27 March 1913, had by that time been reidentified as the SE.2. However, approval for its reconstruction was given, within a cost of .900, and so the opportunity was taken to carry out a number of design changes. Among these was the fitting of an 80hp Gnome engine in a new circular cowling and a completely new tail unit. The latter consisted of small triangular fin surfaces, above and below the fuselage datum, with a high aspect ratio rudder, having a reinforced lower edge member, serving as a tail skid. The new vertical surfaces necessitated the fitting of a divided tailplane and elevators.
In this form the SE.2 was flown by de Havilland in October 1913 and was retained by the Factory until instructions to release it to the Military Wing caused it to be handed over on 17 January 1914, becoming No.609, before being returned to Farnborough in April for further modification. This rebuild included the replacement of the rear fuselage monocoque with a conventional wooden girder of four longerons, with formers and stringers fairing the outside shape. The tail unit was changed to provide a larger fin and rudder and there were new tailplane and elevators. The engine was enclosed in a new cowling, tapering steeply from its largest diameter down towards the propeller boss, and rearwards to align with the fuselage shape. A small spinner was fitted. All external bracing was made of streamlined section wires known as Rafwires, the first use of these, which were adopted extensively.
Frank Goodden flew the rebuilt SE.2 on 3 October 1914 and it was soon serving with No.3 Squadron in France armed with two rifles. It was returned to England in March 1915 and no further details of its use are known.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 27ft.6 l/4in
Chord 3ft 9 l/2in
Gap 4ft 7in
Area 188 sq. ft
Length 20ft 10in
Height 9ft 3in
Weight 720 lb.
Weight allup
1,132 lb. (1st form)
1,246 lb. (2nd form)
Max speed
91 mph (1 st form)
96mph (2nd form)
Endurance 3hr
SE.3 biplane
This was a project for a development of the SE.2, with the more powerful 100hp Gnome nine-cylinder engine, for which some preliminary design work was carried out by HP Folland. It was to be an unstaggered biplane with single I-shaped interplane struts and with ailerons usable as either flaps or airbrakes.
The BS.1, which crashed on 27 March 1913, had by that time been reidentified as the SE.2. However, approval for its reconstruction was given, within a cost of .900, and so the opportunity was taken to carry out a number of design changes. Among these was the fitting of an 80hp Gnome engine in a new circular cowling and a completely new tail unit. The latter consisted of small triangular fin surfaces, above and below the fuselage datum, with a high aspect ratio rudder, having a reinforced lower edge member, serving as a tail skid. The new vertical surfaces necessitated the fitting of a divided tailplane and elevators.
In this form the SE.2 was flown by de Havilland in October 1913 and was retained by the Factory until instructions to release it to the Military Wing caused it to be handed over on 17 January 1914, becoming No.609, before being returned to Farnborough in April for further modification. This rebuild included the replacement of the rear fuselage monocoque with a conventional wooden girder of four longerons, with formers and stringers fairing the outside shape. The tail unit was changed to provide a larger fin and rudder and there were new tailplane and elevators. The engine was enclosed in a new cowling, tapering steeply from its largest diameter down towards the propeller boss, and rearwards to align with the fuselage shape. A small spinner was fitted. All external bracing was made of streamlined section wires known as Rafwires, the first use of these, which were adopted extensively.
Frank Goodden flew the rebuilt SE.2 on 3 October 1914 and it was soon serving with No.3 Squadron in France armed with two rifles. It was returned to England in March 1915 and no further details of its use are known.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 27ft.6 l/4in
Chord 3ft 9 l/2in
Gap 4ft 7in
Area 188 sq. ft
Length 20ft 10in
Height 9ft 3in
Weight 720 lb.
Weight allup
1,132 lb. (1st form)
1,246 lb. (2nd form)
Max speed
91 mph (1 st form)
96mph (2nd form)
Endurance 3hr
SE.3 biplane
This was a project for a development of the SE.2, with the more powerful 100hp Gnome nine-cylinder engine, for which some preliminary design work was carried out by HP Folland. It was to be an unstaggered biplane with single I-shaped interplane struts and with ailerons usable as either flaps or airbrakes.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
BE.2c biplane
The BE.2c was the result of a good deal of development work at Farnborough on stability, carried out on examples of its predecessors. The ability of the aircraft to fly, with the minimum of control movement by the pilot, was regarded as a great attribute for a reconnaissance aircraft, the intended role of the BE.2c. The lack of maneuverability was later to become a great disadvantage, when air fighting developed.
The most apparent change from the BE.2b was the use of wing stagger, which was obtained by moving the lower wing back, to compensate for the loss of lift, occasioned by the use of a smaller non-lifting tailplane. The ailerons replaced wing warping on all four wings and a fin was fitted. The twin skid undercarriage of the BE.2b was used on early aircraft, but was later replaced by a vee type with cross axle on most aircraft. The long exhausts, fitted under the fuselage, were shortened later and some machines had exhausts taken up over the top wing. Many changes and operational additions came much later, among which was the introduction of the RAF. la engine, made by the Factory.
The BE.2c was in production by a number of contractors over a long period and was in service until the end of the war.
Power:
70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee
90hp RAF.1a eight-cylinder air-cooled vee
Data
Span 37ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft 3in
Area 354 sq. ft *
Area tailplane 36 sq. ft
Area elevators 27 sq. ft
Area rudder 12 sq. ft
Area fin 4 sq. ft
Length 27ft 3in
Height lift 1 l/2in
* Alternative sources quote 371 & 396 sq. ft
Data RAF. 1a
Weight 1,370lb.
Weight allup 2,142lb.
Max speed
86 mph at sea level
72 mph at 6,500ft
Climb to 6,500ft 20min
Climb to 3,000ft 6 min
Ceiling 10,000ft
Endurance 3 1/4hr
The BE.2c was the result of a good deal of development work at Farnborough on stability, carried out on examples of its predecessors. The ability of the aircraft to fly, with the minimum of control movement by the pilot, was regarded as a great attribute for a reconnaissance aircraft, the intended role of the BE.2c. The lack of maneuverability was later to become a great disadvantage, when air fighting developed.
The most apparent change from the BE.2b was the use of wing stagger, which was obtained by moving the lower wing back, to compensate for the loss of lift, occasioned by the use of a smaller non-lifting tailplane. The ailerons replaced wing warping on all four wings and a fin was fitted. The twin skid undercarriage of the BE.2b was used on early aircraft, but was later replaced by a vee type with cross axle on most aircraft. The long exhausts, fitted under the fuselage, were shortened later and some machines had exhausts taken up over the top wing. Many changes and operational additions came much later, among which was the introduction of the RAF. la engine, made by the Factory.
The BE.2c was in production by a number of contractors over a long period and was in service until the end of the war.
Power:
70hp Renault eight-cylinder air-cooled vee
90hp RAF.1a eight-cylinder air-cooled vee
Data
Span 37ft
Chord 5ft 6in
Gap 6ft 3in
Area 354 sq. ft *
Area tailplane 36 sq. ft
Area elevators 27 sq. ft
Area rudder 12 sq. ft
Area fin 4 sq. ft
Length 27ft 3in
Height lift 1 l/2in
* Alternative sources quote 371 & 396 sq. ft
Data RAF. 1a
Weight 1,370lb.
Weight allup 2,142lb.
Max speed
86 mph at sea level
72 mph at 6,500ft
Climb to 6,500ft 20min
Climb to 3,000ft 6 min
Ceiling 10,000ft
Endurance 3 1/4hr
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
FE.2a biplane
The FE.2a was a new type of two-seater pusher biplane, the design of which began in the middle of 1914, the first aircraft flying on 26 January 1915, piloted by Frank Goodden.
The aircraft was considerably bigger and heavier than the earlier FE.2 types, with a very deep nacelle, reduced at the front to seat the observer in an exposed position, with a wide area of view. The machine was fitted with BE.2c wings, but without stagger, for the two bays outboard of the wide center section. The center section trailing edge was hinged to form a flap intended to be used as an airbrake, but this was discarded on later production aircraft. The undercarriage had oleo legs and a nose wheel which required a complex arrangement of supporting struts.
The tailplane was mounted on the top of the tail booms, with a triangular fin above, as a kingpost for bracing wires. The rearmost struts in the tail booms were wider in chord to provide additional fin area ahead of the large aerodynamically balanced rudder.
Small side air intakes provided cooling air to the radiator for the cowled Green engine, which was originally fitted, but which was soon replaced by a Beardmore engine of lighter weight.
Twelve machines were ordered straight off the drawing board and, although delay occurred in delivery due to slowness of engine deliveries, the aircraft were dispatched by October 1915, and all saw service in France. The FE.2a. was later developed through the FE.2b to FE.2h, and was a successful aircraft in the early part of the war and was used in various roles until the Armistice.
Power:
100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a two-bladed propeller
120hp Beardmore (Austro-Daimler) six-cylinder inline water-cooled
Data
Span
47ft 10in plain ailerons
50ft 1in balanced ailerons
Chord 5 ft 6in
Gap 6ft 3 l/2in
Area 494 sq. ft
Length 32ft 3 l/2in
Weight 1,993 1b.
Weight allup 2,680 lb.
Max speed
75 mph at sea level (Green)
80 mph at sea level (Beardmore)
Climb to 3,000ft 8 l/4min
The FE.2a was a new type of two-seater pusher biplane, the design of which began in the middle of 1914, the first aircraft flying on 26 January 1915, piloted by Frank Goodden.
The aircraft was considerably bigger and heavier than the earlier FE.2 types, with a very deep nacelle, reduced at the front to seat the observer in an exposed position, with a wide area of view. The machine was fitted with BE.2c wings, but without stagger, for the two bays outboard of the wide center section. The center section trailing edge was hinged to form a flap intended to be used as an airbrake, but this was discarded on later production aircraft. The undercarriage had oleo legs and a nose wheel which required a complex arrangement of supporting struts.
The tailplane was mounted on the top of the tail booms, with a triangular fin above, as a kingpost for bracing wires. The rearmost struts in the tail booms were wider in chord to provide additional fin area ahead of the large aerodynamically balanced rudder.
Small side air intakes provided cooling air to the radiator for the cowled Green engine, which was originally fitted, but which was soon replaced by a Beardmore engine of lighter weight.
Twelve machines were ordered straight off the drawing board and, although delay occurred in delivery due to slowness of engine deliveries, the aircraft were dispatched by October 1915, and all saw service in France. The FE.2a. was later developed through the FE.2b to FE.2h, and was a successful aircraft in the early part of the war and was used in various roles until the Armistice.
Power:
100hp Green six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a two-bladed propeller
120hp Beardmore (Austro-Daimler) six-cylinder inline water-cooled
Data
Span
47ft 10in plain ailerons
50ft 1in balanced ailerons
Chord 5 ft 6in
Gap 6ft 3 l/2in
Area 494 sq. ft
Length 32ft 3 l/2in
Weight 1,993 1b.
Weight allup 2,680 lb.
Max speed
75 mph at sea level (Green)
80 mph at sea level (Beardmore)
Climb to 3,000ft 8 l/4min
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RE.5 biplane
The basic RE.5 was a large two-seater with the pilot seated in the rear cockpit. The engine was closely cowled and ducted cooling air to a radiator mounted behind the engine; the cooling air exhausted through louvered panels on either side of the fuselage. A tall rudder, with curved trailing edge, and triangular fin were fitted, together with a conventional tailplane and divided elevators. Much use was made of steel tubing in the fuselage structure and tail unit.
This further development of the RE.2/3 first appeared with equal span wings, and with ailerons fitted to both top and bottom. Later, on four aircraft, the top wings were increased in span, braced to the lower wing by diagonal struts, and the ailerons were moved outboard. One of these aircraft, No.380, flown by Norman Spratt, reached an altitude of 18,900 feet on 14 May 1914. Certain of the extended span aircraft had increased fuel tankage and were flown as single-seaters.
A total of 24 RE.5 aircraft were delivered between January 1914 and early 1915, and most served with the RFC. Experiments, to reduce their long landing run, were made with both a 'plough brake' on the undercarriage and airbrakes on the fuselage sides. One aircraft served with the RNAS, and others were retained at Farnborough for trials, including the dropping of cast iron weights of up to 10 cwt.. the testing of the RAF.4 and Sunbeam engines, also the RAF type of undercarriage oleo legs.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler or Beardmore six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving either two or four-bladed propellers.
Data
Span 45ft 3 l/2in or 57ft l/2in
Chord 6ft
Area 498 sq. ft or 569 sq. ft
Max speed 78 mph
Climb 400ft per min
RE.6 biplane
This was a design for a three-seater biplane powered by a 250hp engine and fitted with a float undercarriage. The project was discontinued at an early design stage.
The basic RE.5 was a large two-seater with the pilot seated in the rear cockpit. The engine was closely cowled and ducted cooling air to a radiator mounted behind the engine; the cooling air exhausted through louvered panels on either side of the fuselage. A tall rudder, with curved trailing edge, and triangular fin were fitted, together with a conventional tailplane and divided elevators. Much use was made of steel tubing in the fuselage structure and tail unit.
This further development of the RE.2/3 first appeared with equal span wings, and with ailerons fitted to both top and bottom. Later, on four aircraft, the top wings were increased in span, braced to the lower wing by diagonal struts, and the ailerons were moved outboard. One of these aircraft, No.380, flown by Norman Spratt, reached an altitude of 18,900 feet on 14 May 1914. Certain of the extended span aircraft had increased fuel tankage and were flown as single-seaters.
A total of 24 RE.5 aircraft were delivered between January 1914 and early 1915, and most served with the RFC. Experiments, to reduce their long landing run, were made with both a 'plough brake' on the undercarriage and airbrakes on the fuselage sides. One aircraft served with the RNAS, and others were retained at Farnborough for trials, including the dropping of cast iron weights of up to 10 cwt.. the testing of the RAF.4 and Sunbeam engines, also the RAF type of undercarriage oleo legs.
Power: 120hp Austro-Daimler or Beardmore six-cylinder inline water-cooled driving either two or four-bladed propellers.
Data
Span 45ft 3 l/2in or 57ft l/2in
Chord 6ft
Area 498 sq. ft or 569 sq. ft
Max speed 78 mph
Climb 400ft per min
RE.6 biplane
This was a design for a three-seater biplane powered by a 250hp engine and fitted with a float undercarriage. The project was discontinued at an early design stage.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SE.4 biplane
The SE.4 was a single-seat tractor biplane designed by H.P Folland, which was of similar style to the projected SE.3, but with more power.
The fuselage was of girder type, with formers and stringers to fair the shape to circular section. A triangular dorsal fin, and a smaller ventral fin, were fitted together with a conventional rudder. The tailplane and divided elevators had the gaps sealed with an elastic material to reduce drag. The wings were like those of the unbuilt SE.3 with I-shaped interplane struts and full span ailerons capable of use as flaps, when raised, to reduce drag for high speed flight. The undercarriage was unusual, consisting of a transverse leaf spring mounted to an inverted tripod of struts. Owing to excessive rolling during taxiing trials it was soon altered to a conventional type with rubber cord sprung axle. The 160hp Gnome proved to be unreliable and was changed for a 100hp Gnome Monosoupape, with the consequent reduction of performance.
The SE.4 was ready for testing on 17 June 1914by Norman Spratt and was passed to the RFC in August, but was badly damaged in a landing accident on the 12th of the month and was not rebuilt. Work on a second machine was discontinued.
Power:
160hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder two-row air-cooled rotary
100hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 27ft.6in.
Chord 3ft.9 l/2in
Gap 5ft lin
Area 188 sq. ft
Length 21ft 4in
Height 9ft tripod u\c, 9ft 10in V u\c
Max speed
135mph (160hp)
92mph(100hp)
Min speed 52mph
Climb 1,600 ft /min (160hp)
Endurance 1hr
SE.4a biplane
The design of the SE.4a was begun late in 1914 by H.P Folland but the aircraft did not fly until 25 June 1915, when Frank Goodden made the first flight. Three more of the type soon followed, but these were a modified version which had flat sided fuselages with only short fairings behind the open fronted, circular engine cowling, whereas the first machine had the circular fuselage shape obtained with formers and stringers. The large spinner of the prototype was open at the center and a cooling fan was fitted to supplement the airflow through the narrow opening around the periphery. This was not used on the subsequent aircraft.
The SE.4a was a new design with few of the SE.4 components used in its construction, perhaps only the tailplane and elevators. The full span ailerons used as flaps or to reduce drag when raised, were again fitted, but in a new staggered wing cellule with conventional interplane struts. There was no center section and the top wings met at the centerline at an inverted V-cabane.
The prototype, No.5609, probably remained at Farnborough. but the other three Nos.5610-5612, were used by the RFC with Lewis guns fitted to the top center section, the first British aircraft with forward firing guns.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 27ft 6in
Chord 4ft 2in
Gap 4ft 9in
Length 20ft 10 l/2in
Height 9ft 5in
The SE.4 was a single-seat tractor biplane designed by H.P Folland, which was of similar style to the projected SE.3, but with more power.
The fuselage was of girder type, with formers and stringers to fair the shape to circular section. A triangular dorsal fin, and a smaller ventral fin, were fitted together with a conventional rudder. The tailplane and divided elevators had the gaps sealed with an elastic material to reduce drag. The wings were like those of the unbuilt SE.3 with I-shaped interplane struts and full span ailerons capable of use as flaps, when raised, to reduce drag for high speed flight. The undercarriage was unusual, consisting of a transverse leaf spring mounted to an inverted tripod of struts. Owing to excessive rolling during taxiing trials it was soon altered to a conventional type with rubber cord sprung axle. The 160hp Gnome proved to be unreliable and was changed for a 100hp Gnome Monosoupape, with the consequent reduction of performance.
The SE.4 was ready for testing on 17 June 1914by Norman Spratt and was passed to the RFC in August, but was badly damaged in a landing accident on the 12th of the month and was not rebuilt. Work on a second machine was discontinued.
Power:
160hp Gnome fourteen-cylinder two-row air-cooled rotary
100hp Gnome Monosoupape nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 27ft.6in.
Chord 3ft.9 l/2in
Gap 5ft lin
Area 188 sq. ft
Length 21ft 4in
Height 9ft tripod u\c, 9ft 10in V u\c
Max speed
135mph (160hp)
92mph(100hp)
Min speed 52mph
Climb 1,600 ft /min (160hp)
Endurance 1hr
SE.4a biplane
The design of the SE.4a was begun late in 1914 by H.P Folland but the aircraft did not fly until 25 June 1915, when Frank Goodden made the first flight. Three more of the type soon followed, but these were a modified version which had flat sided fuselages with only short fairings behind the open fronted, circular engine cowling, whereas the first machine had the circular fuselage shape obtained with formers and stringers. The large spinner of the prototype was open at the center and a cooling fan was fitted to supplement the airflow through the narrow opening around the periphery. This was not used on the subsequent aircraft.
The SE.4a was a new design with few of the SE.4 components used in its construction, perhaps only the tailplane and elevators. The full span ailerons used as flaps or to reduce drag when raised, were again fitted, but in a new staggered wing cellule with conventional interplane struts. There was no center section and the top wings met at the centerline at an inverted V-cabane.
The prototype, No.5609, probably remained at Farnborough. but the other three Nos.5610-5612, were used by the RFC with Lewis guns fitted to the top center section, the first British aircraft with forward firing guns.
Power: 80hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 27ft 6in
Chord 4ft 2in
Gap 4ft 9in
Length 20ft 10 l/2in
Height 9ft 5in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RATHEN biplane (George Morrice, John Scott and George Dean, Rathen near Fraserburgh, Scotland)
This machine was built by three friends in 1911 with the object of competing for the Daily Mail .1,000 prize then on offer for a flight between Glasgow and Edinburgh. Morrice and Scott, originally from Buchan, returned from America and set up an engineering works at Rathen in conjunction with Dean, who was from England.
The aircraft structure was the work of Morrice and Scott and the engine was Dean's handiwork. It was to be flown by a pilot named Nutter from Nelson in Lancashire. Dean was apparently aiming to make a machine capable of flying the Atlantic, hoping to win the much larger prize on offer. However the aircraft was not completed, work being discontinued when Dean, who had a marital problem, disappeared.
The type of machine can be seen from the only available photograph, which shows a single-seater biplane with an elegant fuselage of circular frames and stringers. The wings had straight leading and curved trailing edges, blending into rounded wing tips. Among the parts are six-cylinder barrels and two propellers with corrugated blades, the latter probably bought from Cochrane or Beney.
Power: 60hp Dean probably water-cooled
Data
Span 22ft
Length 20ft
Speed 68mph
This machine was built by three friends in 1911 with the object of competing for the Daily Mail .1,000 prize then on offer for a flight between Glasgow and Edinburgh. Morrice and Scott, originally from Buchan, returned from America and set up an engineering works at Rathen in conjunction with Dean, who was from England.
The aircraft structure was the work of Morrice and Scott and the engine was Dean's handiwork. It was to be flown by a pilot named Nutter from Nelson in Lancashire. Dean was apparently aiming to make a machine capable of flying the Atlantic, hoping to win the much larger prize on offer. However the aircraft was not completed, work being discontinued when Dean, who had a marital problem, disappeared.
The type of machine can be seen from the only available photograph, which shows a single-seater biplane with an elegant fuselage of circular frames and stringers. The wings had straight leading and curved trailing edges, blending into rounded wing tips. Among the parts are six-cylinder barrels and two propellers with corrugated blades, the latter probably bought from Cochrane or Beney.
Power: 60hp Dean probably water-cooled
Data
Span 22ft
Length 20ft
Speed 68mph
Rathen biplane intended to compete in the Daily Mail flight from Glasgow to Edinburgh was not completed in 1911.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RIDLEY gliders (Cyril Burfield Ridley, Arundel House School Aero Club, Surbiton, Surrey)
A Chanute type biplane glider was built by Cyril Ridley of Thames Ditton in 1910, while he was a pupil at Arundel House School. The machine was flown successfully at Sandown Park on several occasions and also at the Crystal Palace. It was made of cheap materials and did not last long. For 1911 Ridley proposed to make a monoplane glider and wrote to The Aero asking for comments on his suggested design. After leaving school Ridley worked for Sopwiths in the Rink, before the War. But by April 1916 had learned to fly at the Hall School before joining the RNAS on 25 June 1916.
Data Glider No.l Glider No.2
Span 18ft 24ft
Chord 4ft 6in 6ft
Gap 4ft 6in -
Area sq. ft sq. ft
Length 14ft 16ft
Weight 140 lb. -
ARUNDEL HOUSE SCHOOL CLUB glider. (Sec. R.P. Grimmer, Senior Pupil, R.F. Mann)
A biplane of Chanute type was built by Cyril Ridley (q.v.), pupil at the school in 1910. The two leading lights in the club were later partners building, in wartime, the Mann and Grimmer M1 biplane. A second glider was reported nearly complete in May 1910, built by pupil Owen Wilson-Jones of Surbiton.
A Chanute type biplane glider was built by Cyril Ridley of Thames Ditton in 1910, while he was a pupil at Arundel House School. The machine was flown successfully at Sandown Park on several occasions and also at the Crystal Palace. It was made of cheap materials and did not last long. For 1911 Ridley proposed to make a monoplane glider and wrote to The Aero asking for comments on his suggested design. After leaving school Ridley worked for Sopwiths in the Rink, before the War. But by April 1916 had learned to fly at the Hall School before joining the RNAS on 25 June 1916.
Data Glider No.l Glider No.2
Span 18ft 24ft
Chord 4ft 6in 6ft
Gap 4ft 6in -
Area sq. ft sq. ft
Length 14ft 16ft
Weight 140 lb. -
ARUNDEL HOUSE SCHOOL CLUB glider. (Sec. R.P. Grimmer, Senior Pupil, R.F. Mann)
A biplane of Chanute type was built by Cyril Ridley (q.v.), pupil at the school in 1910. The two leading lights in the club were later partners building, in wartime, the Mann and Grimmer M1 biplane. A second glider was reported nearly complete in May 1910, built by pupil Owen Wilson-Jones of Surbiton.
Cyril Ridley from Thames Ditton built this glider in 1910 while still at Arundel House School. He flew it at Sandown Park and the Crystal Palace.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ROLLS RPG powered glider
C.S. Rolls acquired his first glider from Shorts in July 1909, which was based on an early Wright type. (Short-Wright glider S.9). Soon after Rolls placed on order with Shorts for a second glider (S.12), which seemingly was not delivered in complete form, but was developed by stages into a powered aircraft (RPG.IV). The extent of Rolls' influence on the design is not clear, for features of Shorts construction at the time were used in a basic layout resembling a Wright twin pusher aircraft, fitted with a 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled engine.
The aircraft was virtually complete at Eastchurch in May 1910 and was for sale, but may not have flown before Rolls died at Bournemouth on the 12th of July. It was almost certainly regarded as an obsolete type and, if Rolls had lived, his own designs would probably have been based on Farman or Sommer types, for the indications were that Rolls had intentions of becoming a constructor himself.
The fate of the RPG is not known but it was probably dismantled soon after Rolls' death. The unsuccessful Short No.3 (Constructors No.S.24), probably contributed it's engine and parts of the airframe in the construction of RPG IV.
C.S. Rolls acquired his first glider from Shorts in July 1909, which was based on an early Wright type. (Short-Wright glider S.9). Soon after Rolls placed on order with Shorts for a second glider (S.12), which seemingly was not delivered in complete form, but was developed by stages into a powered aircraft (RPG.IV). The extent of Rolls' influence on the design is not clear, for features of Shorts construction at the time were used in a basic layout resembling a Wright twin pusher aircraft, fitted with a 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled engine.
The aircraft was virtually complete at Eastchurch in May 1910 and was for sale, but may not have flown before Rolls died at Bournemouth on the 12th of July. It was almost certainly regarded as an obsolete type and, if Rolls had lived, his own designs would probably have been based on Farman or Sommer types, for the indications were that Rolls had intentions of becoming a constructor himself.
The fate of the RPG is not known but it was probably dismantled soon after Rolls' death. The unsuccessful Short No.3 (Constructors No.S.24), probably contributed it's engine and parts of the airframe in the construction of RPG IV.
Rolls powered glider (RPG) of 1909-1910 built by Shorts at Eastchurch and developed by C.S. Rolls just prior to his death.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
ROWELL monoplane (R. Rowell & Co., Springwell House, Bath Rd., Cheltenham, Gloucestershire)
This firm of cycle agents built a Bleriot type monoplane covered with Pegamoid in 1910-1912 It was offered for sale in June 1912.
Power: 30/35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled semiradial.
Data
Span 36ft
Length 28ft
This firm of cycle agents built a Bleriot type monoplane covered with Pegamoid in 1910-1912 It was offered for sale in June 1912.
Power: 30/35hp Lascelles four-cylinder air-cooled semiradial.
Data
Span 36ft
Length 28ft
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RUFFY biplanes (Ruffy School of Flying. Works at 34 Kendall Mews, George St., Portman Square, London W. Flying operations at Hendon)
The Ruffy School of Flying was a training establishment that built Caudron biplanes in 1914 and used them for instructional purposes at Hendon. Both single and two seater machines with 45hp Anzani six-cylinder radial and 50 and 60hp Gnome seven-cylinder rotary engines were built. The company became the Ruffy-Baumann School of Flying in early 1915, to which the James brothers (q.v.), moved their Caudron type built in Wales in late 1914.
The Ruffy School of Flying was a training establishment that built Caudron biplanes in 1914 and used them for instructional purposes at Hendon. Both single and two seater machines with 45hp Anzani six-cylinder radial and 50 and 60hp Gnome seven-cylinder rotary engines were built. The company became the Ruffy-Baumann School of Flying in early 1915, to which the James brothers (q.v.), moved their Caudron type built in Wales in late 1914.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
RYLEY glider (L.G. Ryley, Coventry Aero Club)
This canard type biplane, named 'Dragonfly I', was made in 1914 and, on 21 August, was tested by towing, carrying operators of up to ten stone in weight. The war soon stopped these activities.
The machine was constructed mainly of bamboo, with steel joint fittings, all glued and bound with twine; ash was used for the skids and deal for the interplane struts and internal compression ribs in the wings.
Data
Span 24ft
Chord 4ft
Gap 4ft 6in
Area 184 sq. ft
Area elevator 27 sq. ft
Area rudder 4 1/2 sq. ft
Length 17ft 6in
This canard type biplane, named 'Dragonfly I', was made in 1914 and, on 21 August, was tested by towing, carrying operators of up to ten stone in weight. The war soon stopped these activities.
The machine was constructed mainly of bamboo, with steel joint fittings, all glued and bound with twine; ash was used for the skids and deal for the interplane struts and internal compression ribs in the wings.
Data
Span 24ft
Chord 4ft
Gap 4ft 6in
Area 184 sq. ft
Area elevator 27 sq. ft
Area rudder 4 1/2 sq. ft
Length 17ft 6in
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SANDERS biplane No.1 (Capt. Haydn Arnold Sanders MD, London Aeroplane and Navigation Co., 23 Blenheim Park Rd., Croydon, Surrey)
Capt. Sanders was assisted by his brother, Kempton Sanders and FL. Rawson, a consultant.
The machine was built at Kessingland, near Lowestoft, and was tested at Benacre Denes, making its first flight in October 1909, but was wrecked on hitting a telephone wire on 13 February 1910. In its short life the Sanders biplane had achieved a flight of 2 1/2 miles, but had only flown at heights up to twenty-five feet.
The biplane was constructed mainly of steel tubing and was a canard design with a fixed boxkite biplane unit on the front booms. There was a single rudder behind the elevators, which were hinged to the top and bottom wing trailing edges. The wings had tips which curved downwards outboard of the X-shaped interplane struts, the centers of which served as mountings for the aileron hinges.
The pilot was seated ahead of the engine which drove twin pusher propellers on long shafts by chains. The engine, although reliable, was heavy at 289 lb., for the power developed. The undercarriage was a tubular structure with two main wheels and twin wooden skids and a single tail wheel. Certain features were covered by patent No.4624/1909.
Power: 30hp Brooke four-cylinder inline water-cooled 'marine' engine driving two 8ft diameter propellers by chains.
Data
Span 50ft
Capt. Sanders was assisted by his brother, Kempton Sanders and FL. Rawson, a consultant.
The machine was built at Kessingland, near Lowestoft, and was tested at Benacre Denes, making its first flight in October 1909, but was wrecked on hitting a telephone wire on 13 February 1910. In its short life the Sanders biplane had achieved a flight of 2 1/2 miles, but had only flown at heights up to twenty-five feet.
The biplane was constructed mainly of steel tubing and was a canard design with a fixed boxkite biplane unit on the front booms. There was a single rudder behind the elevators, which were hinged to the top and bottom wing trailing edges. The wings had tips which curved downwards outboard of the X-shaped interplane struts, the centers of which served as mountings for the aileron hinges.
The pilot was seated ahead of the engine which drove twin pusher propellers on long shafts by chains. The engine, although reliable, was heavy at 289 lb., for the power developed. The undercarriage was a tubular structure with two main wheels and twin wooden skids and a single tail wheel. Certain features were covered by patent No.4624/1909.
Power: 30hp Brooke four-cylinder inline water-cooled 'marine' engine driving two 8ft diameter propellers by chains.
Data
Span 50ft
Sanders biplane No.l was built and tested near Kessingland in 1909-1910. It flew successfully until it hit telephone wires.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SANDERS teacher.
After the crash of No.l, Sanders moved to Beccles where a ground trainer was constructed with control surfaces and structure representative of those to be used for No.2.
SANDERS biplane No.2 Types 1 and 2 (Sanders Aeroplane Co., Beccles, Suffolk)
The second Sanders biplane was made in two versions and had quite a different fuselage from No. 1, although contemporary reports referred to 'reconstruction' taking place. The only report of flight refers to three over Beccles Common, where the machine was constructed. These took place on 30 April 1911, when a height of forty feet was achieved and a speed of 40mph. This was soon after the Type 2 aircraft had been exhibited at Olympia in March and probably refers to that machine.
The Type 1 was illustrated in March and must have been tested earlier in the year, but no evidence of flight can be traced. In advertisements in June 1911 the machine was referred to as the 'Aerial Cruiser' with a 'Sanders Patent Aerial Gun'.
The two versions were basically identical, except for the power, which on the Type 1, had twin pusher propellers, whereas the Type 2 had a single larger propeller. This change necessitated widening the gap between the tail booms to provide clearance, which then tapered to the tail in plan, instead of being parallel as on No.l.
The main girder took the form of an extended undercarriage structure and formed a mounting for the front biplane elevator, which incorporated two small fixed fins. The undercarriage consisted of a nose-wheel and a pair of main wheels on a rubber cord sprung axle, which after takeoff could be retracted to allow the machine to land on the skids to reduce the landing run. The top wing had the down turned tips, as used previously, but the lower was of reduced span, cut squarely at the outboard interplane struts with wingtip skids below. Outboard of the center section were three pairs of interplane struts, the two rear outers being used to mount the ailerons. On the twin pusher version, further pairs of struts were necessary to mount the bearings for the propeller shafts. The outer wing bays, with the ailerons, could be folded forward to reduce the span for storage. Elevator flaps were again fitted to the top and bottom center sections on the first version but were not present on the machine at Olympia. Three narrow chord rudders were fitted at the tail. The pilot again sat ahead of the engine which was flanked on either side by coolant radiators, with a fuel and oil tank above.
The first machine had an Alvaston engine with the twin propellers driven by chains. The second machine had an ENV, driving a single propeller by chain on a shaft mounted above. A report that Sanders' aircraft was converted to a waterplane and was in Northumberland in 1913 has not been confirmed.
Power:
No.1 50hp Alvaston four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled driving two 8ft 6in diameter propellers by chains and shafts.
No.2 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a 9ft diameter Sanders propeller by chain and shaft at a ratio of 1.4 to 1.
Data for Type 1.
Span 40ft
Chord 6ft
Area 472 3/4 sq. ft (inc. tailplanes)
Length 31ft 6in
Front elevator span 12ft
Front elevator chord 3 ft
Front elevator area 72 sq. ft
Rudders height 6ft
Rudders chord 1ft
Rudders area 18 sq. ft
Ailerons span 7ft
Ailerons chord 2ft
Ailerons area 4 sq. ft each
Weight
1,100 lb. (Type 1)
1,000 lb. (Type 2)
After the crash of No.l, Sanders moved to Beccles where a ground trainer was constructed with control surfaces and structure representative of those to be used for No.2.
SANDERS biplane No.2 Types 1 and 2 (Sanders Aeroplane Co., Beccles, Suffolk)
The second Sanders biplane was made in two versions and had quite a different fuselage from No. 1, although contemporary reports referred to 'reconstruction' taking place. The only report of flight refers to three over Beccles Common, where the machine was constructed. These took place on 30 April 1911, when a height of forty feet was achieved and a speed of 40mph. This was soon after the Type 2 aircraft had been exhibited at Olympia in March and probably refers to that machine.
The Type 1 was illustrated in March and must have been tested earlier in the year, but no evidence of flight can be traced. In advertisements in June 1911 the machine was referred to as the 'Aerial Cruiser' with a 'Sanders Patent Aerial Gun'.
The two versions were basically identical, except for the power, which on the Type 1, had twin pusher propellers, whereas the Type 2 had a single larger propeller. This change necessitated widening the gap between the tail booms to provide clearance, which then tapered to the tail in plan, instead of being parallel as on No.l.
The main girder took the form of an extended undercarriage structure and formed a mounting for the front biplane elevator, which incorporated two small fixed fins. The undercarriage consisted of a nose-wheel and a pair of main wheels on a rubber cord sprung axle, which after takeoff could be retracted to allow the machine to land on the skids to reduce the landing run. The top wing had the down turned tips, as used previously, but the lower was of reduced span, cut squarely at the outboard interplane struts with wingtip skids below. Outboard of the center section were three pairs of interplane struts, the two rear outers being used to mount the ailerons. On the twin pusher version, further pairs of struts were necessary to mount the bearings for the propeller shafts. The outer wing bays, with the ailerons, could be folded forward to reduce the span for storage. Elevator flaps were again fitted to the top and bottom center sections on the first version but were not present on the machine at Olympia. Three narrow chord rudders were fitted at the tail. The pilot again sat ahead of the engine which was flanked on either side by coolant radiators, with a fuel and oil tank above.
The first machine had an Alvaston engine with the twin propellers driven by chains. The second machine had an ENV, driving a single propeller by chain on a shaft mounted above. A report that Sanders' aircraft was converted to a waterplane and was in Northumberland in 1913 has not been confirmed.
Power:
No.1 50hp Alvaston four-cylinder horizontally opposed water-cooled driving two 8ft 6in diameter propellers by chains and shafts.
No.2 60hp ENV type F eight-cylinder water-cooled vee driving a 9ft diameter Sanders propeller by chain and shaft at a ratio of 1.4 to 1.
Data for Type 1.
Span 40ft
Chord 6ft
Area 472 3/4 sq. ft (inc. tailplanes)
Length 31ft 6in
Front elevator span 12ft
Front elevator chord 3 ft
Front elevator area 72 sq. ft
Rudders height 6ft
Rudders chord 1ft
Rudders area 18 sq. ft
Ailerons span 7ft
Ailerons chord 2ft
Ailerons area 4 sq. ft each
Weight
1,100 lb. (Type 1)
1,000 lb. (Type 2)
Sanders biplane No.2 of 1911. This is the first version with Alvaston engine and twin pusher propellers.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SAUL tandem biplane No.l (G.P. Deverall Saul)
Also described as a quadruplane, the machine was a tandem biplane, built by Handley Page at 36 William St.. Woolwich, London SE. It was completed in May 1909 and Handley Page tested it on a trolley towed by a car to aid the low powered motor, at his new flying ground and premises at Dagenham. The machine apparently lifted off briefly on 25 May 1909 with H.P aboard, and Saul was sufficiently encouraged to order a two-seater version. The machine was also flown as a kite. The Saul biplane was exhibited at the Sport and Travel Exhibition at Olympia which opened on 6 July 1909.
The structure was built of wood, mainly hickory, and rested on two long skids. The front wings had rigid curved leading edges and flexible trailing portions; the rear wings were of greater span and of similar construction. The pairs of wings were heavily staggered in opposite directions, the whole arrangement being patented to cover a claim for automatic stability. There were no other control surfaces or systems. A small motor drove a pusher propeller.
Power: 8hp air-cooled petrol motor of unknown make.
Data
Span 20ft
Chord 3 ft
Gap 3ft
Area 216 sq. ft
Length 20ft
Weight 162lb.
Weight allup 320lb.
Speed 30mph
Price ?250
SAUL tandem biplane No.2
The two-seater, of similar design, was under construction in mid-1909 by Handley Page at Dagenham, also a similar machine for the Bridgwater Motor Co., Handley Page's agent in the West of England. There were no further reports of these machines. Price ?550.
Power: 20-25hp air-cooled petrol motor of unknown make.
Also described as a quadruplane, the machine was a tandem biplane, built by Handley Page at 36 William St.. Woolwich, London SE. It was completed in May 1909 and Handley Page tested it on a trolley towed by a car to aid the low powered motor, at his new flying ground and premises at Dagenham. The machine apparently lifted off briefly on 25 May 1909 with H.P aboard, and Saul was sufficiently encouraged to order a two-seater version. The machine was also flown as a kite. The Saul biplane was exhibited at the Sport and Travel Exhibition at Olympia which opened on 6 July 1909.
The structure was built of wood, mainly hickory, and rested on two long skids. The front wings had rigid curved leading edges and flexible trailing portions; the rear wings were of greater span and of similar construction. The pairs of wings were heavily staggered in opposite directions, the whole arrangement being patented to cover a claim for automatic stability. There were no other control surfaces or systems. A small motor drove a pusher propeller.
Power: 8hp air-cooled petrol motor of unknown make.
Data
Span 20ft
Chord 3 ft
Gap 3ft
Area 216 sq. ft
Length 20ft
Weight 162lb.
Weight allup 320lb.
Speed 30mph
Price ?250
SAUL tandem biplane No.2
The two-seater, of similar design, was under construction in mid-1909 by Handley Page at Dagenham, also a similar machine for the Bridgwater Motor Co., Handley Page's agent in the West of England. There were no further reports of these machines. Price ?550.
Power: 20-25hp air-cooled petrol motor of unknown make.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SAUNDERSON monoplane Mayfly (H.P. Saunderson & Mills, Elstow, Bedfordshire)
The Saunderson monoplane arrived at the Blackpool Meeting on 18 October 1909. Although it was reported to have flown previously, when tested on Dunstable Downs, it was unable to lift off at Blackpool.
The machine was a single-seat tractor with wings mounted high on either side of a fuselage of tubular construction. Power was provided by a three-cylinder air-cooled fantype radial also made by Saunderson.
SAUNDERSON monoplane Verifly
The second monoplane built by Saunderson in 1910, was tested on the Earl of Verulam's estate, Gorhambury Park, St. Alban's. It probably used the same engine as the first machine. No record of flight can be traced.
The fuselage of the aircraft was very shallow, so the seat and the pilot were exposed to the slipstream. The box girder was tapered and fully enclosed, probably with plywood covering. Two triangular shaped fins were fitted, above and below the rear fuselage, the lower protected by a separate skid. The rudder is not shown in surviving photographs, but was apparently fitted to the top fin only. The tailplane consisted of triangular shaped halves extending well along the fuselage sides. The elevator was in one piece and was also triangular. The undercarriage and wings were similar to those of the earlier machine and may have been transferred from it. The name 'Verifly' was carried on both sides of the fuselage with a decorated surround.
The Saunderson monoplane arrived at the Blackpool Meeting on 18 October 1909. Although it was reported to have flown previously, when tested on Dunstable Downs, it was unable to lift off at Blackpool.
The machine was a single-seat tractor with wings mounted high on either side of a fuselage of tubular construction. Power was provided by a three-cylinder air-cooled fantype radial also made by Saunderson.
SAUNDERSON monoplane Verifly
The second monoplane built by Saunderson in 1910, was tested on the Earl of Verulam's estate, Gorhambury Park, St. Alban's. It probably used the same engine as the first machine. No record of flight can be traced.
The fuselage of the aircraft was very shallow, so the seat and the pilot were exposed to the slipstream. The box girder was tapered and fully enclosed, probably with plywood covering. Two triangular shaped fins were fitted, above and below the rear fuselage, the lower protected by a separate skid. The rudder is not shown in surviving photographs, but was apparently fitted to the top fin only. The tailplane consisted of triangular shaped halves extending well along the fuselage sides. The elevator was in one piece and was also triangular. The undercarriage and wings were similar to those of the earlier machine and may have been transferred from it. The name 'Verifly' was carried on both sides of the fuselage with a decorated surround.
Saunderson monoplane No.l 'Mayfly' was taken to the Blackpool Meeting in October 1909 but did not fly.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SCHMARZ ornithopter 'Airship' (Rudolf Schmarz, 14 Dorset St., W. Derby together with C.W. Sandler, Sutton Lodge, Great Sutton, Cheshire)
Known as the 'Airship', the machine was in fact heavier than air with a rotor and flapping wings. It was built by Archibald Ford & Co. at Liverpool in 1909-1910, with the intention of flying across the Mersey. Patent No 2165/1909 is relevant.
Data
Height 12ft approx.
Rotor diameter 20ft
Known as the 'Airship', the machine was in fact heavier than air with a rotor and flapping wings. It was built by Archibald Ford & Co. at Liverpool in 1909-1910, with the intention of flying across the Mersey. Patent No 2165/1909 is relevant.
Data
Height 12ft approx.
Rotor diameter 20ft
Schmarz ornithopter built in Liverpool in 1909-1910 with the intention of flying across the River Mersey.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SCOTTISH AVIATION Co., Caledonia and Dart monoplanes. (185 Hope St., Glasgow)
This company published a prospectus on 14 December 1911 stating, among other things, the acquisition of Barrhead Aerodrome and an agreement to build Avro-type aircraft. A. V. Roe was himself on the list of directors. The managing director, Frederick Norman, reported in The Aero on 9 October 1911, that an Avro-type aircraft was nearing completion and that a Scottish-built Farman type pusher biplane, already flying, was to be re-engined with a 50hp Alvaston, built at Glasgow, to make it eligible to compete for the ?1,000 prize on offer for a flight from Edinburgh to Glasgow by an all-Scottish machine.
The first aircraft, of which illustrations have been traced, is the Caledonia monoplane, which was flying at Barrhead from November 1911 piloted by R.W. Philpott, the company pilot. Norman was the designer of this single-seat tractor monoplane, with triangular section fuselage and twin skid, four wheeled undercarriage. It was powered by a 35hp JAP eight-cylinder vee air-cooled engine.
<...>
This company published a prospectus on 14 December 1911 stating, among other things, the acquisition of Barrhead Aerodrome and an agreement to build Avro-type aircraft. A. V. Roe was himself on the list of directors. The managing director, Frederick Norman, reported in The Aero on 9 October 1911, that an Avro-type aircraft was nearing completion and that a Scottish-built Farman type pusher biplane, already flying, was to be re-engined with a 50hp Alvaston, built at Glasgow, to make it eligible to compete for the ?1,000 prize on offer for a flight from Edinburgh to Glasgow by an all-Scottish machine.
The first aircraft, of which illustrations have been traced, is the Caledonia monoplane, which was flying at Barrhead from November 1911 piloted by R.W. Philpott, the company pilot. Norman was the designer of this single-seat tractor monoplane, with triangular section fuselage and twin skid, four wheeled undercarriage. It was powered by a 35hp JAP eight-cylinder vee air-cooled engine.
<...>
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SCOTTISH AVIATION Co., Caledonia and Dart monoplanes. (185 Hope St., Glasgow)
This company published a prospectus on 14 December 1911 stating, among other things, the acquisition of Barrhead Aerodrome and an agreement to build Avro-type aircraft. A. V. Roe was himself on the list of directors. The managing director, Frederick Norman, reported in The Aero on 9 October 1911, that an Avro-type aircraft was nearing completion and that a Scottish-built Farman type pusher biplane, already flying, was to be re-engined with a 50hp Alvaston, built at Glasgow, to make it eligible to compete for the ?1,000 prize on offer for a flight from Edinburgh to Glasgow by an all-Scottish machine.
<...>
A Bleriot with a modified undercarriage and skids, also fitted with a 35hp JAP engine, appeared for the first time on 3 February 1912, and became known as the SAC Dart. The two monoplanes and the Avro and Farman type biplanes were destroyed in a fire at Barrhead on 13 April 1912. This set back the prospects for growth of Scottish Aviation and no further reports of flying at Barrhead or of the company followed this disaster.
This company published a prospectus on 14 December 1911 stating, among other things, the acquisition of Barrhead Aerodrome and an agreement to build Avro-type aircraft. A. V. Roe was himself on the list of directors. The managing director, Frederick Norman, reported in The Aero on 9 October 1911, that an Avro-type aircraft was nearing completion and that a Scottish-built Farman type pusher biplane, already flying, was to be re-engined with a 50hp Alvaston, built at Glasgow, to make it eligible to compete for the ?1,000 prize on offer for a flight from Edinburgh to Glasgow by an all-Scottish machine.
<...>
A Bleriot with a modified undercarriage and skids, also fitted with a 35hp JAP engine, appeared for the first time on 3 February 1912, and became known as the SAC Dart. The two monoplanes and the Avro and Farman type biplanes were destroyed in a fire at Barrhead on 13 April 1912. This set back the prospects for growth of Scottish Aviation and no further reports of flying at Barrhead or of the company followed this disaster.
SAC Dart was a much modified Bleriot monoplane flown at Barrhead in 1911 and destroyed by fire with the other SAC machines. The pilot is the comedian Harry Tate.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SEDDON biplane (Lt. J.W. Seddon RN, and A.G. Hackett, Wolverhampton)
This tandem biplane, jointly designed by Seddon and Hackett, was possibly the world's largest at the time of its appearance in the late summer of 1910, at Dunstall Park flying ground, Wolverhampton. It was built by Accles and Pollock Ltd., tube manufacturers of Oldbury, Worcestershire and employed mainly circular members rolled from tube in its construction. About 2.000 feet of tubing was used.
The machine was a twin-engined tractor with a front biplane elevator, with two rudders between each pair of main wings, and a fin aft of the front wings. Separate fuel tanks and radiators were provided for each engine, these being mounted on either side of the crew enclosure, intended to carry six people amidships.
Seddon carried out an initial run on 7 November 1910, but testing was halted when a wheel collapsed. The machine was extremely heavy and did not fly, and was later scrapped.
Power: Two 65hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke engines driving Beedle propellers by chains.
Data
Area 1,000 sq. ft
Weight 2,600 lb.
This tandem biplane, jointly designed by Seddon and Hackett, was possibly the world's largest at the time of its appearance in the late summer of 1910, at Dunstall Park flying ground, Wolverhampton. It was built by Accles and Pollock Ltd., tube manufacturers of Oldbury, Worcestershire and employed mainly circular members rolled from tube in its construction. About 2.000 feet of tubing was used.
The machine was a twin-engined tractor with a front biplane elevator, with two rudders between each pair of main wings, and a fin aft of the front wings. Separate fuel tanks and radiators were provided for each engine, these being mounted on either side of the crew enclosure, intended to carry six people amidships.
Seddon carried out an initial run on 7 November 1910, but testing was halted when a wheel collapsed. The machine was extremely heavy and did not fly, and was later scrapped.
Power: Two 65hp NEC four-cylinder inline water-cooled two-stroke engines driving Beedle propellers by chains.
Data
Area 1,000 sq. ft
Weight 2,600 lb.
THE SEDDON AEROPLANE. - A most unusual type of aeroplane has made its appearance at Wolverhampton, and is illustrated above. It consists of a tandem biplane, and has been designed by Lieut. J. W. Seddon and Mr. A G. Hackett. Apart from the tandem biplane principle, which has not yet been given any real practical trial, the Seddon machine is also unique in its system of construction, the bracing of the main planes being effected by an arrangement of crossed hoops instead of by the usual system of struts and ties. The constructive work has been carried out by Messrs. Accles and Pollock, at Oldbury, the two engines, which drive Beedle propellers, being supplied by the New Engine Co. The estimated weight of the machine is about one ton, and its supporting surface about 1,000 sq. ft. Beyond the Seddon machine a monoplane is seen.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SHEFFIELD & DISTRICT Aero Club gliders
A tailless biplane glider of 42ft span was illustrated in flight under tow at Tinsley on 16 July 1910. In May 1911 it was presented to the Conisbrough and District Aeroplane Society. A member of the society, S.H. Dewsnap, constructed a full-sized biplane glider with tail. This was reported in towed flight on 13 May 1913, with two small children aboard, when it reached a height of 20ft.
A tailless biplane glider of 42ft span was illustrated in flight under tow at Tinsley on 16 July 1910. In May 1911 it was presented to the Conisbrough and District Aeroplane Society. A member of the society, S.H. Dewsnap, constructed a full-sized biplane glider with tail. This was reported in towed flight on 13 May 1913, with two small children aboard, when it reached a height of 20ft.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SHORT Bros, aircraft
The two younger brothers, Eustace and Oswald began constructing balloons in 1900 at Hove, but moved to Battersea railway arches in 1903. In November 1908 the partnership, which now included the eldest brother Horace, was established to build heavier-than-air aircraft. Their first products were an unsuccessful biplane for F.K. McClean, and a more successful machine for J.T.C. Moore-Brabazon. These were followed by a license agreement with the Wright brothers to build six Wright Flyers, the demand coming from would-be British aviators, headed by C.S. Rolls, who also ordered a glider of Wright type on which to gain his first experience of flight.
This work established Short Bros, as the first aircraft manufacturers in the world and necessitated an increase in the work force. Anew factory was established at Leysdown, also known as Shellbeach, on the Isle of Sheppey, in March 1909 for aircraft manufacture, leaving Battersea to continue for a period beyond 1914 on balloon and airship work. The following year the factory was reestablished a few miles away at Eastchurch on ground providing a more suitable airfield. The increased seaplane work in 1913, necessitated a more convenient site and an enlarged factory, which was built on the banks of the River Med way at Rochester. Shorts became the major contractor for seaplanes for the RNAS in the Great War and specialized mainly in marine aircraft until the demand for these ceased. The company remains in being, but has been located in Belfast for many years resulting from major rearrangements of the industry following the Second World War.
The early products of the company were recorded in numerical sequence in an order book; the number, prefixed by the letter S, indicated the sequence in which work was initiated, but was not related to the first flight or delivery date. The book included orders for aircraft of types other than Short's designs, also major spares orders were entered, creating breaks in the continuity of the constructors number sequence.
The particulars of the aircraft follow in groups of related type and are not in strict numerical order. The naval serial numbers and Admiralty type numbers are also quoted to facilitate identification; the latter became the more usual means of identification in the later part of the period covered.
SHORT biplane S.1
An order for an aeroplane from F.K. McClean, early in 1909, was the start of aircraft manufacture by the Short brothers. No. 1 was designed by Horace Short and was built at Battersea, in quick time, to be exhibited as an uncovered structure at the Olympia Aero Show of March 1909. After the Show it was taken to Shellbeach for completion and covering. The first trials were in September with the Nordenfeldt car engine, later used in Short-Wright No.3 with which it failed to leave the starting rail. A Wright engine, made by Barriquand et Marre in France, arrived in October, but after McClean made several attempts to take off, damage occurred and the machine was discarded. Although The Aero later reported that 'the machine had the ability to fly' there is no evidence to support this statement.
Short No.1 was a three bay biplane with front biplane elevator incorporating a fixed fin. The wings were double surfaced and heavily cambered, with the chords of the outer bays considerably increased in width to provide a flexible surface for lateral control. Four rudders were pivoted between these flexible panels for directional control.
The pilot's position was ahead of the lower wing front spar and the engine, which drove twin pusher propellers by chains and shafts. A narrow radiator filled the gap between the wings on the starboard side of the engine. The chassis was a long twin skid structure without wheels.
Power:
30hp Nordenfeldt four-cylinder inline water-cooled car engine weighing 600 lb.
30hp Wright four-cylinder inline water-cooled made by Barriquand et Marre in France driving two 10ft diameter propellers by uncrossed chains and shafts.
Data
Span 40ft
Length 24ft 7in
Area 576 sq. ft
Weight allup 1,2001b.
The two younger brothers, Eustace and Oswald began constructing balloons in 1900 at Hove, but moved to Battersea railway arches in 1903. In November 1908 the partnership, which now included the eldest brother Horace, was established to build heavier-than-air aircraft. Their first products were an unsuccessful biplane for F.K. McClean, and a more successful machine for J.T.C. Moore-Brabazon. These were followed by a license agreement with the Wright brothers to build six Wright Flyers, the demand coming from would-be British aviators, headed by C.S. Rolls, who also ordered a glider of Wright type on which to gain his first experience of flight.
This work established Short Bros, as the first aircraft manufacturers in the world and necessitated an increase in the work force. Anew factory was established at Leysdown, also known as Shellbeach, on the Isle of Sheppey, in March 1909 for aircraft manufacture, leaving Battersea to continue for a period beyond 1914 on balloon and airship work. The following year the factory was reestablished a few miles away at Eastchurch on ground providing a more suitable airfield. The increased seaplane work in 1913, necessitated a more convenient site and an enlarged factory, which was built on the banks of the River Med way at Rochester. Shorts became the major contractor for seaplanes for the RNAS in the Great War and specialized mainly in marine aircraft until the demand for these ceased. The company remains in being, but has been located in Belfast for many years resulting from major rearrangements of the industry following the Second World War.
The early products of the company were recorded in numerical sequence in an order book; the number, prefixed by the letter S, indicated the sequence in which work was initiated, but was not related to the first flight or delivery date. The book included orders for aircraft of types other than Short's designs, also major spares orders were entered, creating breaks in the continuity of the constructors number sequence.
The particulars of the aircraft follow in groups of related type and are not in strict numerical order. The naval serial numbers and Admiralty type numbers are also quoted to facilitate identification; the latter became the more usual means of identification in the later part of the period covered.
SHORT biplane S.1
An order for an aeroplane from F.K. McClean, early in 1909, was the start of aircraft manufacture by the Short brothers. No. 1 was designed by Horace Short and was built at Battersea, in quick time, to be exhibited as an uncovered structure at the Olympia Aero Show of March 1909. After the Show it was taken to Shellbeach for completion and covering. The first trials were in September with the Nordenfeldt car engine, later used in Short-Wright No.3 with which it failed to leave the starting rail. A Wright engine, made by Barriquand et Marre in France, arrived in October, but after McClean made several attempts to take off, damage occurred and the machine was discarded. Although The Aero later reported that 'the machine had the ability to fly' there is no evidence to support this statement.
Short No.1 was a three bay biplane with front biplane elevator incorporating a fixed fin. The wings were double surfaced and heavily cambered, with the chords of the outer bays considerably increased in width to provide a flexible surface for lateral control. Four rudders were pivoted between these flexible panels for directional control.
The pilot's position was ahead of the lower wing front spar and the engine, which drove twin pusher propellers by chains and shafts. A narrow radiator filled the gap between the wings on the starboard side of the engine. The chassis was a long twin skid structure without wheels.
Power:
30hp Nordenfeldt four-cylinder inline water-cooled car engine weighing 600 lb.
30hp Wright four-cylinder inline water-cooled made by Barriquand et Marre in France driving two 10ft diameter propellers by uncrossed chains and shafts.
Data
Span 40ft
Length 24ft 7in
Area 576 sq. ft
Weight allup 1,2001b.
Short S.l. The brothers' first aircraft was built at Battersea and shown at Olympia part finished in March 1909. The machine failed to fly when on test at Shellbeach.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SHORT biplane S2
Horace Short designed his second machine to Moore-Brabazon's order of April 1909, for a machine on which to attempt to win the Daily Mail Prize of ?1,000, for a circuit of one mile on a British aircraft flown by a British pilot. The aircraft was built at Shellbeach and was ready to receive the engine in September. For the initial trials a Belgian Vivinus engine was fitted, until the British-made Green became available in early October. However two flights were made with the heavy Vivinus, including one of nearly a mile on 27 September 1909. After repair of damage and fitment of the Green, Moore-Brabazon flew for a mile to win the prize on 30 October 1909. S2 was then flown successfully from Shellbeach to the new Short works at Eastchurch, a distance of four and a half miles, on 7 January 1910 and on 1 March 1910 flew nineteen miles in thirty-one minutes before the crankshaft broke. This flight won him the British Empire Michelin Trophy of 1910. The aircraft was exhibited on the Royal Aero Club stand at Olympia in March 1910.
Short S2 was a twin pusher biplane with three-bay wings outboard of the twin girder chassis. The wings were mainly parallel in chord, of higher aspect ratio than on S1 and with tips curving to a point, where a strut was provided to mount the 'balancers' for lateral control. These each consisted of two surfaces of different areas on an arm with a central pivot and these worked differentially controlled by foot pedals.
The main girder structure was carried upwards at the front to mount the biplane elevator with rudder mounted behind. A fixed tail was carried on wire braced top and bottom booms. In the early part of 1910 the tail was modified; twin booms tapering in side elevation, were fitted with a much extended fin and fixed tail surfaces.
The pilot sat on the leading edge of the lower wing on the starboard side of the centrally mounted engine with a space to port for a passenger; a pig was carried on one occasion for a wager to prove that pigs could fly! The single narrow radiator was later replaced by two of greater width and lower height on the lower wings in line with the chassis members.
Power:
32 l/2hp (?) Vivinus four-cylinder inline water-cooled reported 'to weigh 200 lb. more and give 15hp less than the Green engine'.
50/60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving twin pusher propellers by uncrossed chains and shafts.
Data
Span 48ft 4in
Length 32ft
Area 450 sq. ft
Weight allup 1,485 lb.
Speed 45mph
Horace Short designed his second machine to Moore-Brabazon's order of April 1909, for a machine on which to attempt to win the Daily Mail Prize of ?1,000, for a circuit of one mile on a British aircraft flown by a British pilot. The aircraft was built at Shellbeach and was ready to receive the engine in September. For the initial trials a Belgian Vivinus engine was fitted, until the British-made Green became available in early October. However two flights were made with the heavy Vivinus, including one of nearly a mile on 27 September 1909. After repair of damage and fitment of the Green, Moore-Brabazon flew for a mile to win the prize on 30 October 1909. S2 was then flown successfully from Shellbeach to the new Short works at Eastchurch, a distance of four and a half miles, on 7 January 1910 and on 1 March 1910 flew nineteen miles in thirty-one minutes before the crankshaft broke. This flight won him the British Empire Michelin Trophy of 1910. The aircraft was exhibited on the Royal Aero Club stand at Olympia in March 1910.
Short S2 was a twin pusher biplane with three-bay wings outboard of the twin girder chassis. The wings were mainly parallel in chord, of higher aspect ratio than on S1 and with tips curving to a point, where a strut was provided to mount the 'balancers' for lateral control. These each consisted of two surfaces of different areas on an arm with a central pivot and these worked differentially controlled by foot pedals.
The main girder structure was carried upwards at the front to mount the biplane elevator with rudder mounted behind. A fixed tail was carried on wire braced top and bottom booms. In the early part of 1910 the tail was modified; twin booms tapering in side elevation, were fitted with a much extended fin and fixed tail surfaces.
The pilot sat on the leading edge of the lower wing on the starboard side of the centrally mounted engine with a space to port for a passenger; a pig was carried on one occasion for a wager to prove that pigs could fly! The single narrow radiator was later replaced by two of greater width and lower height on the lower wings in line with the chassis members.
Power:
32 l/2hp (?) Vivinus four-cylinder inline water-cooled reported 'to weigh 200 lb. more and give 15hp less than the Green engine'.
50/60hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving twin pusher propellers by uncrossed chains and shafts.
Data
Span 48ft 4in
Length 32ft
Area 450 sq. ft
Weight allup 1,485 lb.
Speed 45mph
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SHORT-WRIGHT glider S9 (CSR.1)
This was a copy of the Wright glider of 1902-1903, the structure of which was made at Battersea for C.S. Rolls in the spring of 1909, and was then taken to Leysdown for covering. The machine was completed by the end of July and Rolls commenced testing immediately, using a rail on a slope near Leysdown. A number of glides were made terminating on 10 October 1909 when, having acquired sufficient experience of handling the glider, Rolls offered it for sale in March 1910. A second order for a glider, S12, was apparently not completed but may have covered work for a later powered glider.
The glider had equal span two bay wings with warping control, a front biplane elevator and twin rear rudders. It differed from the original Wright in that the pilot sat upright controlling the machine with a lever on the right hand side operating the elevator and one on the left operating both the warp and the rudders. Fins, known as 'half-moons', were added between the biplane elevators during the time that the glider was in use.
Data
Span 32ft 10in
Area 325 sq. ft
Length 18ft
This was a copy of the Wright glider of 1902-1903, the structure of which was made at Battersea for C.S. Rolls in the spring of 1909, and was then taken to Leysdown for covering. The machine was completed by the end of July and Rolls commenced testing immediately, using a rail on a slope near Leysdown. A number of glides were made terminating on 10 October 1909 when, having acquired sufficient experience of handling the glider, Rolls offered it for sale in March 1910. A second order for a glider, S12, was apparently not completed but may have covered work for a later powered glider.
The glider had equal span two bay wings with warping control, a front biplane elevator and twin rear rudders. It differed from the original Wright in that the pilot sat upright controlling the machine with a lever on the right hand side operating the elevator and one on the left operating both the warp and the rudders. Fins, known as 'half-moons', were added between the biplane elevators during the time that the glider was in use.
Data
Span 32ft 10in
Area 325 sq. ft
Length 18ft
Short-Wright glider S.9 as delivered to Rolls in July 1909 for practice prior to completion of his powered Short-Wright.
Short-Wright glider S.9 at Leysdon in August 1909 after rear rudder and 'halfmoons' had been fitted.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SHORT-WRIGHT biplanes S3-S8
Six of these biplanes were built at Shellbeach under license from the Wright brothers, to the same design as the Wright Flyer used by the Wrights for demonstrations in the U.S.A. and in France. Some changes however were made to the last two which were built.
Four aircraft were completed but waiting for engines by July 1909. The third, for McClean, was tested with a Nordenfeldt car engine, but could not maintain flight after launching. The car engine was replaced with one of Wright type built by Barriquand et Marre. No.l was tested in October by C.S. Rolls, with a Wright engine made in France by the Leon Bollee company of Le Mans. Some damage was sustained during the initial tests, but this was soon repaired and flight was achieved on 1 November 1909.
The six machines were delivered to private owners as follows:
S3 No.1 C.S. Rolls 1 November 1909
S4 No.2 A. Ogilvie 3 September 1909
S5 No.3 F.K. McClean 20 November 1909 (McClean No.2)
S6 No.4 M. Egerton 21 December 1909
S7 No.5 C.Grace 14 February 1910
S8 No.6 C.S. Rolls 14 February 1910 to A. Ogilvie later
The Wright Model B biplane was of equal span with warping of the two outer bays. The twin skid chassis was extended forward to mount a biplane elevator with 'half-moon' fins between. The twin rudders were mounted on a single width, wire braced tail boom on the first to fourth aircraft; on the fifth and sixth the tail boom was of double width. The water-cooled engine was mounted on the right of the lower center section and drove twin pusher propellers by chain and shafts mounted outboard between the wings. The pilot and passenger sat to the left of the engine, with the pilot in the center. The machine was launched from a rail and landed on the skids.
Ogilvie later modified his second machine at Camber Sands to delete the front elevator and its supporting structure, as on the later version known as the 'headless' Wright. The single elevator was placed behind the rudders and blinker type fins were added to the front skids. The machine was operated on wheels and continued in use until August 1914. It is reported to have flown with three passengers and to have been tried unsuccessfully as a floatplane.
Power:
30hp Wright four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving twin pusher propellers by chains and shafts. French made by Leon Bollee or Barriquand et Marre.
50hp NEC four-cylinder vee water-cooled two-stroke fitted to No.6 September 1910.
Data
Span 41ft
Area 515 sq. ft
Length 29ft
Weight 885 lb.
Weight allup 1,200lb.
Speed 50 mph
SHORT biplane. S13 (Refers also to S18 and S20)
A biplane for the Hon. Maurice Egerton, of which there is no evidence of completion, was on order from December 1909. A further entry, S23, in March 1910 covered the supply of a propeller for this machine. It was to be powered by a Wolseley engine driving two propellers and to have a detachable skid. S18 and S20 were to be similar machines for C.G. Colmore and another.
SHORT biplane S24
This machine, usually referred to as Short No.3 in the press, was ordered by C S . Rolls (his CSR3), and was the last Short machine built at Battersea, before the move to Eastchurch. It appeared at Olympia in March 1910 but failed to fly, when tested briefly by Rolls, soon after the Aero Show closed.
The machine was a smaller and lighter version of S3, but with a single pusher propeller, driven directly by the engine, which necessitated twin tail booms to clear the propeller. The rail and derrick system for launching was abandoned in favor of a four wheeled undercarriage, which could be retracted under spring tension, to permit landing on the skids. The engine was mounted on the centerline in the top half of the wing gap with the main fuel tank below, flanked by twin radiators. A gravity fuel tank and oil tank was mounted above the engine, for which a starting handle was provided. The pilot sat ahead of the wing leading edge between the top longerons.
The tail surfaces were fixed, and consisted of a long rectangular fin mounted at the center of the tailplane, which was of high aspect ratio and was adjustable for incidence on the ground only. The front biplane elevator was without camber and, with the rudder mounted separately behind, was similar to S2. The balancers, mounted on a single strut at the extreme tips of the wings, were single panels of spring tensioned fabric and were controlled by the right-hand lever; foot pedals controlled the rudder, and a separate lever on the left side controlled the front elevator. The main wooden girder structure was similar to that of S2, with flat strip bracing twisted at the point of crossover.
The lack of success in the short time that Rolls had available, before leaving for the Nice Meeting, caused him to discontinue trials, and to dismantle the aircraft, parts of it being used later in the machine known as the Rolls Powered Glider (RPG) costed against Rolls' order for S12.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a Short 7ft 6in diameter propeller direct.
Data
Span 35ft 2in over balancers
31ft 8in to wingtips
Chord 5ft 4in
Gap 4ft 4in
Area 282 sq. ft
Area tailplane 21 1/2 sq. ft
Area elevator 55 sq. ft
Area rudder 10 sq. ft
Area balancers 12 sq. ft each
Length 31ft.
Weight 615 lb.
Weight allup 857 lb.
Speed 45-50 mph
Price ?650
Six of these biplanes were built at Shellbeach under license from the Wright brothers, to the same design as the Wright Flyer used by the Wrights for demonstrations in the U.S.A. and in France. Some changes however were made to the last two which were built.
Four aircraft were completed but waiting for engines by July 1909. The third, for McClean, was tested with a Nordenfeldt car engine, but could not maintain flight after launching. The car engine was replaced with one of Wright type built by Barriquand et Marre. No.l was tested in October by C.S. Rolls, with a Wright engine made in France by the Leon Bollee company of Le Mans. Some damage was sustained during the initial tests, but this was soon repaired and flight was achieved on 1 November 1909.
The six machines were delivered to private owners as follows:
S3 No.1 C.S. Rolls 1 November 1909
S4 No.2 A. Ogilvie 3 September 1909
S5 No.3 F.K. McClean 20 November 1909 (McClean No.2)
S6 No.4 M. Egerton 21 December 1909
S7 No.5 C.Grace 14 February 1910
S8 No.6 C.S. Rolls 14 February 1910 to A. Ogilvie later
The Wright Model B biplane was of equal span with warping of the two outer bays. The twin skid chassis was extended forward to mount a biplane elevator with 'half-moon' fins between. The twin rudders were mounted on a single width, wire braced tail boom on the first to fourth aircraft; on the fifth and sixth the tail boom was of double width. The water-cooled engine was mounted on the right of the lower center section and drove twin pusher propellers by chain and shafts mounted outboard between the wings. The pilot and passenger sat to the left of the engine, with the pilot in the center. The machine was launched from a rail and landed on the skids.
Ogilvie later modified his second machine at Camber Sands to delete the front elevator and its supporting structure, as on the later version known as the 'headless' Wright. The single elevator was placed behind the rudders and blinker type fins were added to the front skids. The machine was operated on wheels and continued in use until August 1914. It is reported to have flown with three passengers and to have been tried unsuccessfully as a floatplane.
Power:
30hp Wright four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving twin pusher propellers by chains and shafts. French made by Leon Bollee or Barriquand et Marre.
50hp NEC four-cylinder vee water-cooled two-stroke fitted to No.6 September 1910.
Data
Span 41ft
Area 515 sq. ft
Length 29ft
Weight 885 lb.
Weight allup 1,200lb.
Speed 50 mph
SHORT biplane. S13 (Refers also to S18 and S20)
A biplane for the Hon. Maurice Egerton, of which there is no evidence of completion, was on order from December 1909. A further entry, S23, in March 1910 covered the supply of a propeller for this machine. It was to be powered by a Wolseley engine driving two propellers and to have a detachable skid. S18 and S20 were to be similar machines for C.G. Colmore and another.
SHORT biplane S24
This machine, usually referred to as Short No.3 in the press, was ordered by C S . Rolls (his CSR3), and was the last Short machine built at Battersea, before the move to Eastchurch. It appeared at Olympia in March 1910 but failed to fly, when tested briefly by Rolls, soon after the Aero Show closed.
The machine was a smaller and lighter version of S3, but with a single pusher propeller, driven directly by the engine, which necessitated twin tail booms to clear the propeller. The rail and derrick system for launching was abandoned in favor of a four wheeled undercarriage, which could be retracted under spring tension, to permit landing on the skids. The engine was mounted on the centerline in the top half of the wing gap with the main fuel tank below, flanked by twin radiators. A gravity fuel tank and oil tank was mounted above the engine, for which a starting handle was provided. The pilot sat ahead of the wing leading edge between the top longerons.
The tail surfaces were fixed, and consisted of a long rectangular fin mounted at the center of the tailplane, which was of high aspect ratio and was adjustable for incidence on the ground only. The front biplane elevator was without camber and, with the rudder mounted separately behind, was similar to S2. The balancers, mounted on a single strut at the extreme tips of the wings, were single panels of spring tensioned fabric and were controlled by the right-hand lever; foot pedals controlled the rudder, and a separate lever on the left side controlled the front elevator. The main wooden girder structure was similar to that of S2, with flat strip bracing twisted at the point of crossover.
The lack of success in the short time that Rolls had available, before leaving for the Nice Meeting, caused him to discontinue trials, and to dismantle the aircraft, parts of it being used later in the machine known as the Rolls Powered Glider (RPG) costed against Rolls' order for S12.
Power: 35hp Green four-cylinder inline water-cooled driving a Short 7ft 6in diameter propeller direct.
Data
Span 35ft 2in over balancers
31ft 8in to wingtips
Chord 5ft 4in
Gap 4ft 4in
Area 282 sq. ft
Area tailplane 21 1/2 sq. ft
Area elevator 55 sq. ft
Area rudder 10 sq. ft
Area balancers 12 sq. ft each
Length 31ft.
Weight 615 lb.
Weight allup 857 lb.
Speed 45-50 mph
Price ?650
Short-Wright biplane S.6 acquired by Ogilvie after Rolls died. It was much altered by him at Camber Sands and was flown successfully until 1914.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
SHORT biplanes, pusher types S26-S29
The Short brothers discontinued the manufacture of Wright type aircraft and changed to those similar to the Farman/Sommer types. The change coincided with the move to Eastchurch and identification by construction numbers beginning at S26. The first production was a batch of four aircraft S26-S29, which were usually referred to as the S27 type, this being the machine which was most successful in the hands of Cecil Grace. The first of the type appeared in June 1910.
The S27 type was a typical pusher biplane of the period with either equal span wings or with top wing extensions. The undercarriage was a simple two wheel, two skid arrangement and the tail was supported by hoops of rattan cane under the booms, although a sprung tail skid was soon fitted. Single acting ailerons were originally fitted to all four wings but Grace had these removed from the lower wings, which suffered from flexibility and which were stiffened at the same time.
The front elevator was split in two and originally extended outboard of the front booms but these extensions were later removed. The rudder was originally one rectangular surface below the tailplane but, when this proved to be inadequate, a similar rudder was mounted above the tailplane. A section of the tailplane trailing edge was hinged and controllable by the pilot as a trimming control.
Water-cooled Green and ENV engines were used originally but later the air-cooled Gnome rotary was fitted. The four aircraft of the type were as follows:
S26. 35/40hp Green: For G.C. Colmore, originally under No.S18, not completed. The machine crashed but was rebuilt and passed to F.K. McClean (McClean No.3), who loaned it to the Navy for pilot instruction. It survived until April 1911, but was sluggish on the controls and known as 'The Dud'. (Naval biplane No.l)
S27. 60hp ENV French-made type F Series 1 No.4: C.S. Grace No.2. Flown by him at Wolverhampton, Bournemouth, Lanark and elsewhere from June 1910. After Grace was lost in December 1910 the aircraft was sold to McClean and converted to become the Tandem Twin with two 50hp Gnome engines. (McClean No.7 became No. 11 after conversion)
S28. 35/40hp Green also 50hp Gnome: For J.T.C. Moore-Brabazon, but transferred to F.K. McClean after Brabazon gave up flying in July, and allocated to the Navy for pilot instruction. (Naval Biplane No.2) Converted for longer range as S38 from May 1911. (Moore-Brabazon No.6. McClean No.5)
S29. 60hp ENV British-made type F: Originally a spare machine but became C.S. Grace No.3 as an all-British machine, to compete in the Baron de Forest Contest. This was the machine in which Grace was lost on 22 December 1910 in the Channel, when returning to England for a second attempt for the Prize
Data
Span 34ft 2in (46ft 5in with extensions)
Chord 6ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 480 sq. ft (517 sq. ft with extensions)
Length 40ft 6in
Weight 1,000 lb.
Weight allup 1,400lb.
Speed 40 mph
S32. Pusher biplane, dual-control type (Refers also to S33, S43 and S44)
S32 was acquired by McClean, and was rebuilt for him as a dual control side by side pusher, which he flew for the first time on 29 July 1911, before lending it to the Navy (McClean No.8).
S33 was a similar machine, which he lent for a short time to the Army for training Territorials. Two more of the type, S43 and S44 were built for the Central Flying School at Upavon becoming Nos.401-402 in the service. These machines were of the same basic S27 type with wing extensions and a 70hp Gnome rotary engine. An additional rudder was fitted above the tailplane. Originally, No.13A in McClean's fleet, S33 was converted to a floatplane for a flight along the Thames on 10 July 1912, then identified as No.13B.
In early 1913 S32 was again rebuilt for McClean to a new standard similar to the S38 type, then becoming McClean No. 14. The machine was provided with a nacelle with tandem seating for two, with a structure at the prow carrying the front elevator. The tail booms were parallel in elevation, but tapered slightly in plan. A rectangular tailplane and elevator were mounted on the top boom and twin rudders pivoted between the booms. A 70hp Gnome was fitted. The wings were extended by a further bay each side to a span of 70ft 6in, with dihedral and taper on the leading edge, outboard of the second pair of interplane struts. Kingposts supported the upper wing extensions.
S32 was intended to be a seaplane to take to Egypt to explore the River Nile, but in this form it was unsatisfactory, and was replaced by S80. S32 was passed to the Admiralty and later rebuilt as S38 with 52ft span wings and duplicated landing wheels. It became serial No.904 and was used for training purposes at Hendon.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data After Rebuild as S38
Span 46ft 5in 70ft 6in 52ft
Area 517 sq. ft 772 1/2 sq. ft 580 sq. ft
Length 40ft 6in
Weight 1,150lb.
Weight allup 1,540lb.
Speed 45 mph 38 mph
The Short brothers discontinued the manufacture of Wright type aircraft and changed to those similar to the Farman/Sommer types. The change coincided with the move to Eastchurch and identification by construction numbers beginning at S26. The first production was a batch of four aircraft S26-S29, which were usually referred to as the S27 type, this being the machine which was most successful in the hands of Cecil Grace. The first of the type appeared in June 1910.
The S27 type was a typical pusher biplane of the period with either equal span wings or with top wing extensions. The undercarriage was a simple two wheel, two skid arrangement and the tail was supported by hoops of rattan cane under the booms, although a sprung tail skid was soon fitted. Single acting ailerons were originally fitted to all four wings but Grace had these removed from the lower wings, which suffered from flexibility and which were stiffened at the same time.
The front elevator was split in two and originally extended outboard of the front booms but these extensions were later removed. The rudder was originally one rectangular surface below the tailplane but, when this proved to be inadequate, a similar rudder was mounted above the tailplane. A section of the tailplane trailing edge was hinged and controllable by the pilot as a trimming control.
Water-cooled Green and ENV engines were used originally but later the air-cooled Gnome rotary was fitted. The four aircraft of the type were as follows:
S26. 35/40hp Green: For G.C. Colmore, originally under No.S18, not completed. The machine crashed but was rebuilt and passed to F.K. McClean (McClean No.3), who loaned it to the Navy for pilot instruction. It survived until April 1911, but was sluggish on the controls and known as 'The Dud'. (Naval biplane No.l)
S27. 60hp ENV French-made type F Series 1 No.4: C.S. Grace No.2. Flown by him at Wolverhampton, Bournemouth, Lanark and elsewhere from June 1910. After Grace was lost in December 1910 the aircraft was sold to McClean and converted to become the Tandem Twin with two 50hp Gnome engines. (McClean No.7 became No. 11 after conversion)
S28. 35/40hp Green also 50hp Gnome: For J.T.C. Moore-Brabazon, but transferred to F.K. McClean after Brabazon gave up flying in July, and allocated to the Navy for pilot instruction. (Naval Biplane No.2) Converted for longer range as S38 from May 1911. (Moore-Brabazon No.6. McClean No.5)
S29. 60hp ENV British-made type F: Originally a spare machine but became C.S. Grace No.3 as an all-British machine, to compete in the Baron de Forest Contest. This was the machine in which Grace was lost on 22 December 1910 in the Channel, when returning to England for a second attempt for the Prize
Data
Span 34ft 2in (46ft 5in with extensions)
Chord 6ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 480 sq. ft (517 sq. ft with extensions)
Length 40ft 6in
Weight 1,000 lb.
Weight allup 1,400lb.
Speed 40 mph
S32. Pusher biplane, dual-control type (Refers also to S33, S43 and S44)
S32 was acquired by McClean, and was rebuilt for him as a dual control side by side pusher, which he flew for the first time on 29 July 1911, before lending it to the Navy (McClean No.8).
S33 was a similar machine, which he lent for a short time to the Army for training Territorials. Two more of the type, S43 and S44 were built for the Central Flying School at Upavon becoming Nos.401-402 in the service. These machines were of the same basic S27 type with wing extensions and a 70hp Gnome rotary engine. An additional rudder was fitted above the tailplane. Originally, No.13A in McClean's fleet, S33 was converted to a floatplane for a flight along the Thames on 10 July 1912, then identified as No.13B.
In early 1913 S32 was again rebuilt for McClean to a new standard similar to the S38 type, then becoming McClean No. 14. The machine was provided with a nacelle with tandem seating for two, with a structure at the prow carrying the front elevator. The tail booms were parallel in elevation, but tapered slightly in plan. A rectangular tailplane and elevator were mounted on the top boom and twin rudders pivoted between the booms. A 70hp Gnome was fitted. The wings were extended by a further bay each side to a span of 70ft 6in, with dihedral and taper on the leading edge, outboard of the second pair of interplane struts. Kingposts supported the upper wing extensions.
S32 was intended to be a seaplane to take to Egypt to explore the River Nile, but in this form it was unsatisfactory, and was replaced by S80. S32 was passed to the Admiralty and later rebuilt as S38 with 52ft span wings and duplicated landing wheels. It became serial No.904 and was used for training purposes at Hendon.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data After Rebuild as S38
Span 46ft 5in 70ft 6in 52ft
Area 517 sq. ft 772 1/2 sq. ft 580 sq. ft
Length 40ft 6in
Weight 1,150lb.
Weight allup 1,540lb.
Speed 45 mph 38 mph
Cecil Grace about to start from Dover in S.29 on 22 December, 1910.
Short S.29 was similar with a British ENV.
Short S.29 was similar with a British ENV.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
S34. Pusher biplane
This was an 'improved S27' fitted with a 50hp Gnome and a nacelle for the crew of two in tandem. It was bought by McClean (his No.7) and loaned for instructional use as Naval Biplane No. 1. It was later sold to the Admiralty for ?500, becoming successively B.I, T.I and serial No.l. A similar machine, S38, was bought by the Admiralty to replace S26, and became T2 and serial No.2. Increased tankage was fitted later to both machines for duration tests.
S35. Pusher biplane (1911 type)
This machine, also referred to as of 'improved S27 type', differed in certain respects it. The most noticeable feature was the nacelle to protect the crew. It was fitted with top wing extensions, single acting ailerons on the top wing only and a single sprung tail skid.
An additional rudder was fitted above the tailplane as on S32. The aircraft was built to the order of the Hon. Maurice Egerton, and was flown by him on 9 March 1911.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span top 46ft
Span bottom 32ft
Chord 6ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 517 sq. ft
Area tailplane 65 sq. ft
Area front elevator 30 1/2 sq. ft
Area rear elevator 26 sq. ft
Area rudders 31 sq. ft
Height lift 6in tail down
Weight 1,100lb.
Weight allup 1,540lb.
Speed 40 mph
This was an 'improved S27' fitted with a 50hp Gnome and a nacelle for the crew of two in tandem. It was bought by McClean (his No.7) and loaned for instructional use as Naval Biplane No. 1. It was later sold to the Admiralty for ?500, becoming successively B.I, T.I and serial No.l. A similar machine, S38, was bought by the Admiralty to replace S26, and became T2 and serial No.2. Increased tankage was fitted later to both machines for duration tests.
S35. Pusher biplane (1911 type)
This machine, also referred to as of 'improved S27 type', differed in certain respects it. The most noticeable feature was the nacelle to protect the crew. It was fitted with top wing extensions, single acting ailerons on the top wing only and a single sprung tail skid.
An additional rudder was fitted above the tailplane as on S32. The aircraft was built to the order of the Hon. Maurice Egerton, and was flown by him on 9 March 1911.
Power: 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving 8ft 6in diameter propeller.
Data
Span top 46ft
Span bottom 32ft
Chord 6ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 517 sq. ft
Area tailplane 65 sq. ft
Area front elevator 30 1/2 sq. ft
Area rear elevator 26 sq. ft
Area rudders 31 sq. ft
Height lift 6in tail down
Weight 1,100lb.
Weight allup 1,540lb.
Speed 40 mph
Short S.28. McClean had a Green engine fitted but trouble with this prevented his attempt on the Baron de Forest prize. A Gnome was refitted later and a nacelle as on S.35 was added.
Commander Samson in rebuilt S.34 at Dover in September 1912.
Short S.34. An instructional machine for the RNAS.(B.l, T.l and No.l).
Short S.34. An instructional machine for the RNAS.(B.l, T.l and No.l).
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
S27. Tandem Twin biplane
Although a major reconstruction was carried out to S27 to fit a second engine, this machine received no separate construction number. The aircraft was built to investigate the effect of rotating airscrews on stability and control and was the subject of patent No.22675/1911 by Horace Short. The first flight took place on 29 October 1911 by McClean, who acquired this as McClean No. 11, as well as many of the early Short aircraft. The Tandem Twin was loaned to the Navy for instructional use from December 1911, but was crashed on 11 March 1912 by Lt. Samson. It was identified as Serial No.4 in the first Admiralty series.
The machine was flown both with and without extensions, and the main structure was unchanged apart from strengthening of the undercarriage. A nacelle was added to house the crew side by side, between the two engines, to which access was gained through an aperture in the floor, the draught through which inspired the nickname 'Vacuum Cleaner'. Two extra rudders were added on top of the original cambered tailplane.
Data
Span 34ft 2in (46ft with extensions)
Chord 6ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 480 sq. ft (571 sq. ft with extensions)
Weight 1,800lb.
Weight allup 2,100lb.
Speed 55 mph
S39. Triple-Twin tractor/pusher biplane (Refers also to S35 rebuild)
This aircraft was built to test Horace Short's ideas to improve control at low speeds, by designing for slipstream over all control surfaces. The twin engines were also a safety measure, since the aircraft could fly successfully on one. McClean flew the S39 solo for the first time on 18 September 1911 and also with Samson as a passenger the same day. (McClean No. 10).
The aircraft was a strengthened form of earlier Short biplanes, with a central nacelle and side-by-side seating. It was necessary to place the front booms closer together, to provide clearance for the outboard propeller tips; the front elevator consequently extended beyond the booms. The tail booms were parallel in plan and with slight taper towards the tail in elevation. The tailplane, with rear elevator, was mounted on the top booms, with three rectangular rudders trailing behind their last uprights. A strengthened undercarriage with diagonal bracing struts and twin tail skids were fitted.
The wings were originally without extensions, which were added later, and were fitted with single acting ailerons both top and bottom, including to the extensions when these were fitted. The front engine drove the outboard counter rotating tractor airscrews by chains. The rear engine was mounted with the propeller in front on an overhung mounting. Two cylindrical fuel tanks were originally mounted below the top center section, but a further pair were added in December 1911, in similar positions on the next pair of interplane struts at the time when the extensions were first fitted. The extensions were removed in October 1912 and replaced by wings of 50 feet span, these also being fitted with extensions later when the span increased to 64 feet.
The Admiralty purchased S39 in June 1912; identified as T3, it became No.3 later. The machine was entirely rebuilt under Short's No.S78, as a single engined, tandem seated pusher with either 70 or 80hp Gnome. From June 1913 it was used by the Navy, including wartime service in France, until finally discarded in April 1916.
A second Triple Twin was constructed from S35 for the Hon. Maurice Egerton and was flown from April 1912 and may have been rebuilt itself by early 1914.
Power: Two 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries driving two 8ft 6in diameter tractor propellers by chain and one 8ft 6in diameter pusher propeller direct.
Data
Span 34ft later 50ft and 64ft
Chord 6ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 435 sq. ft later 650 sq. ft and 745 sq. ft
Area tailplane 65 sq. ft
Area front elevator 29 sq. ft
Area rear elevator 29 sq. ft
Area rudders 45 sq. ft
Length 45ft
Height 12ft
Weight 1,800 lb.
Weight allup 2,100lb.
Speed 55mph
Although a major reconstruction was carried out to S27 to fit a second engine, this machine received no separate construction number. The aircraft was built to investigate the effect of rotating airscrews on stability and control and was the subject of patent No.22675/1911 by Horace Short. The first flight took place on 29 October 1911 by McClean, who acquired this as McClean No. 11, as well as many of the early Short aircraft. The Tandem Twin was loaned to the Navy for instructional use from December 1911, but was crashed on 11 March 1912 by Lt. Samson. It was identified as Serial No.4 in the first Admiralty series.
The machine was flown both with and without extensions, and the main structure was unchanged apart from strengthening of the undercarriage. A nacelle was added to house the crew side by side, between the two engines, to which access was gained through an aperture in the floor, the draught through which inspired the nickname 'Vacuum Cleaner'. Two extra rudders were added on top of the original cambered tailplane.
Data
Span 34ft 2in (46ft with extensions)
Chord 6ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 480 sq. ft (571 sq. ft with extensions)
Weight 1,800lb.
Weight allup 2,100lb.
Speed 55 mph
S39. Triple-Twin tractor/pusher biplane (Refers also to S35 rebuild)
This aircraft was built to test Horace Short's ideas to improve control at low speeds, by designing for slipstream over all control surfaces. The twin engines were also a safety measure, since the aircraft could fly successfully on one. McClean flew the S39 solo for the first time on 18 September 1911 and also with Samson as a passenger the same day. (McClean No. 10).
The aircraft was a strengthened form of earlier Short biplanes, with a central nacelle and side-by-side seating. It was necessary to place the front booms closer together, to provide clearance for the outboard propeller tips; the front elevator consequently extended beyond the booms. The tail booms were parallel in plan and with slight taper towards the tail in elevation. The tailplane, with rear elevator, was mounted on the top booms, with three rectangular rudders trailing behind their last uprights. A strengthened undercarriage with diagonal bracing struts and twin tail skids were fitted.
The wings were originally without extensions, which were added later, and were fitted with single acting ailerons both top and bottom, including to the extensions when these were fitted. The front engine drove the outboard counter rotating tractor airscrews by chains. The rear engine was mounted with the propeller in front on an overhung mounting. Two cylindrical fuel tanks were originally mounted below the top center section, but a further pair were added in December 1911, in similar positions on the next pair of interplane struts at the time when the extensions were first fitted. The extensions were removed in October 1912 and replaced by wings of 50 feet span, these also being fitted with extensions later when the span increased to 64 feet.
The Admiralty purchased S39 in June 1912; identified as T3, it became No.3 later. The machine was entirely rebuilt under Short's No.S78, as a single engined, tandem seated pusher with either 70 or 80hp Gnome. From June 1913 it was used by the Navy, including wartime service in France, until finally discarded in April 1916.
A second Triple Twin was constructed from S35 for the Hon. Maurice Egerton and was flown from April 1912 and may have been rebuilt itself by early 1914.
Power: Two 50hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotaries driving two 8ft 6in diameter tractor propellers by chain and one 8ft 6in diameter pusher propeller direct.
Data
Span 34ft later 50ft and 64ft
Chord 6ft 9in
Gap 6ft 4in
Area 435 sq. ft later 650 sq. ft and 745 sq. ft
Area tailplane 65 sq. ft
Area front elevator 29 sq. ft
Area rear elevator 29 sq. ft
Area rudders 45 sq. ft
Length 45ft
Height 12ft
Weight 1,800 lb.
Weight allup 2,100lb.
Speed 55mph
Short S.27 Tandem-Twin. A major conversion of the original S.27 was acquired by McClean and loaned by him to the Admiralty.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
S33. Pusher biplane, twin float seaplane
This was a further variation of the S27/S32 type, bought by McClean and briefly loaned to the Army, but later converted for use as a seaplane (McClean No.13B). On 31 May 1912 McClean flew the seaplane from the River Swale at Harty Ferry and, on 16 July 1912, flew under all the bridges over the River Thames, including passing under the top span of Tower Bridge, finally alighting on the river between Charing Cross and Westminster Bridges, to attend a reception given by Lord Northcliffe at Carmelite House. Police permission to fly back was refused, the machine was then taxied down river but was damaged at Shadwell Basin and dismantled.
S38. Pusher biplane (Refers also to S55, 58, 59, 61-62, 66-67,75-78, 86 and 89)
S38 began life basically as an S27/32 with top wing extensions and a 50hp Gnome and was initially used for training by the Navy. Later it was used for experimental work as an amphibian, fitted with three streamlined air bags and a 70hp Gnome engine. The aircraft was flown off the platform deck of HMS Africa by Samson on 10 January 1912, the first British shipboard takeoff and the first of a number of experiments, until it was wrecked on 9 July 1912.
This was a further variation of the S27/S32 type, bought by McClean and briefly loaned to the Army, but later converted for use as a seaplane (McClean No.13B). On 31 May 1912 McClean flew the seaplane from the River Swale at Harty Ferry and, on 16 July 1912, flew under all the bridges over the River Thames, including passing under the top span of Tower Bridge, finally alighting on the river between Charing Cross and Westminster Bridges, to attend a reception given by Lord Northcliffe at Carmelite House. Police permission to fly back was refused, the machine was then taxied down river but was damaged at Shadwell Basin and dismantled.
S38. Pusher biplane (Refers also to S55, 58, 59, 61-62, 66-67,75-78, 86 and 89)
S38 began life basically as an S27/32 with top wing extensions and a 50hp Gnome and was initially used for training by the Navy. Later it was used for experimental work as an amphibian, fitted with three streamlined air bags and a 70hp Gnome engine. The aircraft was flown off the platform deck of HMS Africa by Samson on 10 January 1912, the first British shipboard takeoff and the first of a number of experiments, until it was wrecked on 9 July 1912.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
S32. Tractor biplane
This machine was built for Cecil Grace towards the end of 1910, originally as a tractor version of the S27 with a 60hp ENV type F water-cooled engine. Reports appeared that Grace was out at Eastchurch with the aircraft on 12 November 1910, and again after alterations with a mechanic on 19 November 1910. On 27 November 1910 a pair of calipers lying around on the ground, flew into the propeller and damaged it during engine running. No further report on this machine appeared and Grace left for Swingate on 11 December 1910, for his Baron de Forest attempt from which he did not return. No illustration of this machine has been traced, but it was almost certainly similar to the Gnome engined S36.
S36. Tractor biplane
This machine was built for McClean to a design evolved from the original S32 for Cecil Grace, but fitted with a rotary engine. It was flown by McClean for the first time on 10 January 1912 (McClean No.12).
The fuselage was a wooden braced girder, originally uncovered behind the two cockpits; the engine and tank bays were closely cowled with aluminum panels, and plywood covering behind in the cockpit area. The fuselage was mounted centrally in the wing gap and rested directly on the twin skid undercarriage, which was carried on four struts ahead of the wings. The two bay wings had separate pairs of interplane struts adjacent to the fuselage, on which connections were made to attachment fittings, protruding from the fuselage sides at the top and bottom longerons. The wings were of S27 type with top extensions and single acting ailerons on the top wing only; there was a gap in the lower center section. The tail unit consisted of a tailplane with divided elevator, on the top longerons, and an unbalanced rudder. The placing of the fuselage in the gap was aimed at avoiding a change of trim with the non-lifting tailplane. Later the fuselage was lowered slightly and the rear portion was covered with fabric.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 9ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 46ft 5in
Area 515 sq. ft
Length 35ft 6in
Weight 850 lb.
Weight allup 1,300lb.
Speed 60 mph
S45. Tractor biplane (Refers also to S49, S51)
A second biplane for the Navy, similar to S36 41 was flown by Lt. Spenser Grey on 23 May 1912 as a landplane, identified as T5, later No.5. When used as a seaplane it was fitted with a central pontoon float, and twin streamlined airbags under the inboard interplane struts only. An airbag was fitted close-up under the tail later. S45 capsized on 4 October 1912 and was deleted.
S45 (No.5) had been fitted with new wings in the autumn of 1912, in which the top wing extensions were braced by wires and kingposts instead of the diagonal struts originally used. Double acting ailerons were also fitted. The engine cowling was modified to a square section matching the fuselage shape and the top cowling line was continued as decking to the rear of the two cockpits.
In this form the machine was the pattern for three landplanes (S49 51) ordered by the War Office for use at the CFS (serial Nos.413, 423 4). No.413 was soon written off in December 1912. The airframes of 423 and 424 were transferred to the Admiralty in August 1914 and reidentified as 1268 and 1279. These were Shorts last landplanes built prewar.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 42ft
Area 450 sq. ft
Length 35ft 6in
Weight 1,080 lb.
Weight allup 1,500lb.
Speed 60 mph
This machine was built for Cecil Grace towards the end of 1910, originally as a tractor version of the S27 with a 60hp ENV type F water-cooled engine. Reports appeared that Grace was out at Eastchurch with the aircraft on 12 November 1910, and again after alterations with a mechanic on 19 November 1910. On 27 November 1910 a pair of calipers lying around on the ground, flew into the propeller and damaged it during engine running. No further report on this machine appeared and Grace left for Swingate on 11 December 1910, for his Baron de Forest attempt from which he did not return. No illustration of this machine has been traced, but it was almost certainly similar to the Gnome engined S36.
S36. Tractor biplane
This machine was built for McClean to a design evolved from the original S32 for Cecil Grace, but fitted with a rotary engine. It was flown by McClean for the first time on 10 January 1912 (McClean No.12).
The fuselage was a wooden braced girder, originally uncovered behind the two cockpits; the engine and tank bays were closely cowled with aluminum panels, and plywood covering behind in the cockpit area. The fuselage was mounted centrally in the wing gap and rested directly on the twin skid undercarriage, which was carried on four struts ahead of the wings. The two bay wings had separate pairs of interplane struts adjacent to the fuselage, on which connections were made to attachment fittings, protruding from the fuselage sides at the top and bottom longerons. The wings were of S27 type with top extensions and single acting ailerons on the top wing only; there was a gap in the lower center section. The tail unit consisted of a tailplane with divided elevator, on the top longerons, and an unbalanced rudder. The placing of the fuselage in the gap was aimed at avoiding a change of trim with the non-lifting tailplane. Later the fuselage was lowered slightly and the rear portion was covered with fabric.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary driving a 9ft diameter propeller.
Data
Span 46ft 5in
Area 515 sq. ft
Length 35ft 6in
Weight 850 lb.
Weight allup 1,300lb.
Speed 60 mph
S45. Tractor biplane (Refers also to S49, S51)
A second biplane for the Navy, similar to S36 41 was flown by Lt. Spenser Grey on 23 May 1912 as a landplane, identified as T5, later No.5. When used as a seaplane it was fitted with a central pontoon float, and twin streamlined airbags under the inboard interplane struts only. An airbag was fitted close-up under the tail later. S45 capsized on 4 October 1912 and was deleted.
S45 (No.5) had been fitted with new wings in the autumn of 1912, in which the top wing extensions were braced by wires and kingposts instead of the diagonal struts originally used. Double acting ailerons were also fitted. The engine cowling was modified to a square section matching the fuselage shape and the top cowling line was continued as decking to the rear of the two cockpits.
In this form the machine was the pattern for three landplanes (S49 51) ordered by the War Office for use at the CFS (serial Nos.413, 423 4). No.413 was soon written off in December 1912. The airframes of 423 and 424 were transferred to the Admiralty in August 1914 and reidentified as 1268 and 1279. These were Shorts last landplanes built prewar.
Power: 70hp Gnome seven-cylinder air-cooled rotary
Data
Span 42ft
Area 450 sq. ft
Length 35ft 6in
Weight 1,080 lb.
Weight allup 1,500lb.
Speed 60 mph
Short S.36 as originally built with open rear fuselage. The basis for a succession of tractor biplanes was built for McClean in 1911 and followed the abandoned S.32 for the late Cecil Grace.
Deleted by request of (c)Schiffer Publishing
S38. Pusher biplane (Refers also to S55, 58, 59, 61-62, 66-67,75-78, 86 and 89)
S38 began life basically as an S27/32 with top wing extensions and a 50hp Gnome and was initially used for training by the Navy. Later it was used for experimental work as an amphibian, fitted with three streamlined air bags and a 70hp Gnome engine. The aircraft was flown off the platform deck of HMS Africa by Samson on 10 January 1912, the first British shipboard takeoff and the first of a number of experiments, until it was wrecke
S38 began life basically as an S27/32 with top wing extensions and a 50hp Gnome and was initially used for training by the Navy. Later it was used for experimental work as an amphibian, fitted with three streamlined air bags and a 70hp Gnome engine. The aircraft was flown off the platform deck of HMS Africa by Samson on 10 January 1912, the first British shipboard takeoff and the first of a number of experiments, until it was wrecke