A.Jackson Avro Aircraft since 1908 (Putnam)
Avro 523 Pike
In 1916 A. V. Roe decided to move the Avro factory from Manchester to a waterside site convenient for the development of naval aircraft, and bought the stretch of Hampshire grassland which is now Hamble Aerodrome, together with a mile of foreshore on the adjacent Southampton Water. Manchester architect Harry Fairhurst designed the new Avro Hamble Works and a garden city of 350 houses for employees, but after the hangars and only 24 houses had been built, wartime shortage of building materials halted the scheme. Very reluctantly the company was compelled to keep its main works in Manchester and to use Hamble only for erection and as an experimental establishment.
It was to Hamble therefore that their first twin-engined machine and the first to receive a type name, the Avro 523 Pike, was sent for erection and test. Designed by Roy Chadwick to RAF Types IV, VI and VII as a longdistance photo-reconnaissance fighter or short range day or night bomber, it was powered by two opposite-handed 160 hp Sunbeam engines driving pusher airscrews. A fine example of advanced thinking, the Pike was a large three-bay biplane equipped with horizontal-tier bomb-stowage (designed personally by A. V. Roe) and carrying the pilot just ahead of the mainplanes. Gunners’ cockpits fore and aft were armed with Lewis guns on rotatable ring mountings. The divided undercarriage was sprung with larger editions of the famous Avro shock absorbers, and a large comma-type rudder was hinged to a fixed fin of low aspect ratio.
Although the Pike was apparently sent to Hamble some months earlier, the aircraft was erected over a twelve-day period ending on November 11, 1916. After initial tests, new wings were called for by the Admiralty and these arrived at Hamble on January 22, 1917. Performance on a mere 320 hp was said to be very good but the Pike appeared too late. Production contracts had already been awarded to Short Bros for a standard RNAS bomber, and the RFC was interested solely in the much larger Handley Page heavy bombers then under construction.
During test flying, the Pike was sent to the RNAS experimental establishment on the Isle of Grain for demonstration before Admiralty officials but during one flight the Pike was flown with the C.G. position too far aft and was so tail heavy that F. P. Raynham dared not throttle back to attempt a landing. The situation was saved through the gallantry of R. H. Dobson (later Sir Roy Dobson), who climbed out of the rear cockpit and along the top of the fuselage to transfer his weight to the bow gunner’s position. The danger of stalling was averted and a successful landing made. By the end of February 1917, the Pike was ready for delivery, though it was not actually flown to Eastchurch until March 24, 1917.
A second machine, the Avro 523A, built at Manchester and initially tested at Southport, was fitted with two 150 hp Green engines like its predecessor driving pusher airscrews and cooled by nose radiators on each nacelle. Available photographs suggest it was flown both with a single fin and triple fin arrangement. The latter had two Avro 504 style comma rudders outboard which was possibly an attempt to overcome reported stability problems. On completion of four weeks of extensive test flying the machine, which was allocated the RFC serial A316, was despatched from Southport to Hamble on September 11, 1916. Its exposure to the elements at Southport necessitated thorough renovation during which process it was converted to tractor configuration with revised engine mounts and rear radiators and the two outboard fins were dispensed with. It flew for the first time in this form in February 1917. Later, after the completion of official tests both machines were returned to the manufacturers to enjoy extensive experimental careers and were still in commission at Hamble in 1918. Plans to produce Avro 523B and 523C variants with higher powered Sunbeam and Rolls-Royce engines were shelved, but the Admiralty ordered an improved version which appeared in 1917 as the Avro 529.
SPECIFICATION AND DATA
Manufacturers: A. V. Roe and Co. Ltd., Clifton Street, Miles Platting, Manchester; and Hamble Aerodrome, near Southampton, Hants.
Power Plants:
(Avro 523) Two 160 h.p. Sunbeam
(Avro 523A) Two 150 h.p. Green
Dimensions:
Span 60 ft. 0 in. Length 39 ft. 1 in.
Height 11 ft. 8 in. Wing area 815 sq. ft.
Weights: (Avro 523) Tare weight 4,000 lb. All-up weight 6,064 lb.
Performance: (Avro 523)
Maximum speed 97 m.p.h.
Climb to 5,000 ft. 9 min. 30 sec.
Endurance 7 hours
Production:
(Avro 523) One aircraft only, Works Order number believed to be 2230. Allocated the serial N523 after delivery to the RNAS.
(Avro 523A) Two aircraft ordered to contract 87/A/329 dated April 12, 1916, and serials A316 and A317 allocated. It is believed that only A316 was built and that its Works Order was 2231.
Avro 529
In 1916 the Admiralty ordered two enlarged versions of the Pike for long-range bombing duties. Unnamed and known only as the Avro 529 and 529A, they had three-bay folding wings rigged without dihedral, and although closely resembling the Pike were distinguishable from it by the rudder shape. That of the Pike was flat topped with a straight bottom edge to the balance portion, but those of the Avro 529s were curved with a semicircular balance area.
Whereas the first aircraft was built wholly in Manchester and assembled at Hamble, the second was sent there in unfinished state to make way for increased Avro 504K production at Manchester. The Avro 529, first flown in March 1917, was powered by uncowled 190 hp Rolls-Royce Falcons mounted at mid-gap and driving opposite handed airscrews. The Avro 529A, flown at Hamble in the following October, had two 230 hp Galloway-built B.H.P. engines which were fully cowled and housed in nacelles on the lower mainplane. Radically different installations called for two distinct types of fuel systems and in the Avro 529 petrol was carried in a 140 gallon tank in the centre fuselage. On the Avro 529A each nacelle carried its own 50 gallon supply with small wind-driven pumps to raise the fuel to a 10 gallon gravity tank above the engine.
Lewis guns were mounted on Scarff rings over front and rear cockpits and the rear gunner was provided with emergency dual control. The front gunner also acted as bomb aimer and steered the pilot on to target with the aid of a Gosport speaking tube. On the 529A, which carried twenty 50 lb bombs stowed nose upwards inside the fuselage between the spars of the lower wing, he was able to use a projecting prone position in the cockpit floor.
Apart from poor elevator control (a shortcoming of both types), the performance of the Avro 529A was very good on such low power, asymmetrical flying being particularly easy. Nevertheless no production contract materialised and only the prototypes were built.
Both machines were tested at the Aeroplane Experimental Station, Martlesham Heath. The Avro 529A 3695 arrived there for its trials on October 31, 1917, but during the course of these the rudder gave way in the air on November 11, 1917, and the machine crashed. Interestingly, the same problem had occurred, without catastrophe, to the Avro 529 during initial tests in March 1917 and the rudder was strengthened as a result. This first machine was last heard of on January 19, 1918, when it was flown in comparative trials at Martlesham with the Blackburn Kangaroo prototype B9970, a machine which was both larger and more powerful than the Avro 529.
SPECIFICATION AND DATA
Manufacturers: A. V. Roe and Co. Ltd., Clifton Street, Miles Platting, Manchester; and Hamble Aerodrome, near Southampton, Hants.
Power Plants:
(Avro 529) Two 190 h.p. Rolls-Royce Falcon
(Avro 529A) Two 230 h.p. B.H.P. (Galloway-built)
Dimensions, Weights and Performances:
Avro 529 Avro 529A
Span 63 ft. 0 in. 64 ft. 1 in.
Length 39 ft. 8 in. 39 ft. 8 in.
Height 13 ft. 0 in. 13 ft. 0 in.
Wing area 922 1/2 sq. ft. 910 sq. ft.
Tare weight 4,736 lb. 4,361 lb.
All-up weight 6,309 lb. 7,135 lb.
Maximum speed 95 m.p.h. 116 m.p.h.
Climb
to 5,000 ft. - 7 min. 0 sec.
to 6,500 ft. 11 min. 25 sec. 9 min 50 sec
Ceiling 13,500 ft. 17,500 ft.
Endurance 5 hours 5 hours 15 min.
Production: Prototypes only under Contract CP. 122495/16 with R.F.C. serials 3694 (Avro 529) and 3695 (Avro 529A)
Показать полностью
F.Manson British Bomber Since 1914 (Putnam)
Avro Type 523 Pike
Designed by Roy Chadwick to the Royal Aircraft factory's Specification Type VII of 1915, the Avro Type 523 Pike represented a realistic approach to the War Office's demand for a night bomber, although it must be said that the Army's attitude at that time towards the need for large bombing aircraft was less than enthusiastic, and was probably influenced more by a determination to keep abreast of the Admiralty's partisan assumption of the strategic bombing role.
The Pike was a fairly large three-bay biplane with equal-span wings, and with a crew of three, comprising pilot, and nose and midships gunners. The handed 160hp Sunbeam Nubian engines were located at mid-gap with frontal car-type radiators and driving pusher propellers through extension shafts so as to clear the wing trailing edges. Ailerons were fitted to upper and lower wings. The bomb load was to be carried internally in the fuselage with horizontal tier stowage.
The Type 523 was assembled at Avro's newly opened works at Hamble in Hampshire after manufacture at the Manchester factory early in 1916. Unfortunately, despite being designed to a Factory specification, neither the Admiralty nor War Office expressed tangible interest in the Pike, with superior bombers already ordered into production.
On the other hand the Avro company itself undertook further development, producing the Type 523A with 150hp Green engines driving tractor propellers, and later proposing the 523B with 200hp Sunbeams and the 523C with 190hp Rolls-Royce Falcon engines. Neither of the latter came to be built, but their design provided much experience in the evolution of the Type 529 and 533 Manchester bombers. Both the Type 523 and 523A continued to fly at Hamble until 1918.
The Type 523 Pike gained small notoriety when, on one occasion during an early test flight the pilot, Fred Raynham, discovered that the cg was too far aft to permit throttling back to land. The situation was saved when R H Dobson (later Sir Roy, CBE, and Chairman of the Hawker Siddeley Group), who was occupying the midships gunner's cockpit, climbed out and made his way along the top of the fuselage to transfer his weight to the front gunner's position. With the cg restored to manageable limits, Raynham was able to throttle back without the danger of stalling.
Type: Twin-engine, three-crew, three-bay biplane day/night bomber.
Manufacturer: A. V. Roe and Co. Ltd., Miles Platting, Manchester.
Powerplant: Type 523. Two 160hp Sunbeam Nubian water-cooled, in-line engines driving handed two-blade pusher propellers. Type 523A. Two 150hp Green water-cooled, in-line engines driving unhanded two-blade tractor propellers.
Dimensions: Span, 60ft 0in; length, 39ft 1in; height, 11ft 8in; wing area, 815 sq ft.
Weights (Type 523): Tare, 4,000 lb; all-up, 6,064 lb.
Performance (Type 523): Max speed, 97 mph; climb to 10,000ft, 27 min; endurance, 7 hr.
Armament: Provision for single Lewis machine guns on nose and midships gunners' cockpits with Scarff rings. Internal, horizontal-tier stowage of two 100 lb or 112 lb bombs.
Avro Type 529
A natural development of the Avro 523A Pike, the Type 529 retained the same basic configuration, being a slightly larger three-bay, twin-engine biplane with parallel-chord, unstaggered wings. Suitably impressed by the choice of more powerful engines and a potential ability to lift a worthwhile weight of bombs over a range of about 400 miles, the Admiralty ordered two prototypes in 1916, allocating the serials 3694 and 3695.
Powered by two 190hp Rolls-Royce Falcon engines, the first aircraft was flown at Hamble in April 1917, having been built entirely at Manchester. The engines, mounted at mid-gap, were uncowled and drove four-blade propellers, a single 140-gallon fuel tank being situated in the centre fuselage. The undercarriage was similar to that of the Pike, and ailerons were again fitted to both upper and lower wings.
The wings of the Type 529 were, on the insistance of the Admiralty, capable of being folded, a feature that dictated a considerable reduction in the tailplane and elevator areas, and this adversely affected the already poor longitudinal control and stability. Directional control, however, was markedly improved by adopting an enlarged rudder (somewhat of the same shape as the Avro 504's famous 'comma' silhouette).
It is likely that the first aircraft was never intended for more than handling evaluation, and in this respect it was generally regarded as satisfactory in most respects, being capable of being flown straight and level on one engine; the elevator control was however sharply criticised. With the large fuel tank in the fuselage, bombs were probably not capable of being carried.
The second aircraft, termed the Type 529A, was flown at Hamble in October 1917, and differed from the first in being powered by two 230hp Galloway-built BHP engines, completely cowled in nacelles located directly on the lower wings, driving two-blade handed propellers. Each nacelle accommodated a 60-gallon fuel tank for its engine, a small wind-driven pump supplying fuel to a 10-gallon gravity tank under the top wing above the engine.
Removal of the fuel to the nacelles allowed the centre fuselage between the wing spars to incorporate a bomb bay in which up to twenty 50 lb HE RL bombs could be stowed, suspended vertically from circumferential rings round their noses. However, owing to the arrangement of the stowage beams, it was not possible to carry fewer, heavier bombs.
The Type 529A carried a three-man crew comprising pilot, midships gunner and nose gunner, the last also being charged with bomb aiming; communications between him and the pilot was by means of a speaking tube. An unusual feature of the aircraft was the provision of dual controls in the midships gunner's cockpit.
There seems little doubt but that the Avro 529A was designed to perform a bombing role (that of a medium bomber over moderate ranges) whose requirement steadily disappeared with the approaching deliveries of the Handley Page O/400, an aircraft that promised to be so highly adaptable in terms of fuel and bomb load that the need for a relatively specialised bomber with the limited capabilities of the Avro 529 had become superfluous by the time the second example flew; accordingly it never progressed beyond the experimental stage.
Type: Twin-engine, three-crew, three-bay biplane medium bomber.
Manufacturer: A. V. Roe & Co. Ltd., Clifton Street, Miles Platting, Manchester, and Hamble Aerodrome, Southampton, Hampshire.
Powerplant: Type 529. Two 190hp Rolls-Royce Falcon I watercooled in-line engines driving handed four-blade tractor propellers. Type 529A. Two 230hp B.H.P. (Galloway-built) water-cooled inline engines driving two-blade tractor propellers.
Structure: All-wood, wire-braced box-girder fuselage and two-spar, three-bay folding wings; dual controls in midships gunner's cockpit.
Dimensions: Type 529. Span, 63ft 0in (Type 529A, 64ft 1in); length, 39ft 8in; height, 13ft 0in; wing area, 922.5 sq ft (Type 529A, 910 sq ft).
Weights: Type 529. Tare, 4,736 lb; all-up, 6,309 lb. Type 529A. Tare, 4,361 lb; all-up, 7,135 lb.
Performance: Type 529. Max speed, 95 mph at sea level; climb to 10,000ft, 21 min 40 sec; service ceiling, 13,500ft; endurance, 5 hr. Type 529A. Max speed, 116 mph at sea level; climb to 10,000ft, 17 min 20 sec; service ceiling, 17,500ft; endurance, 5 hr.
Armament: Single 0.303in Lewis machine guns with Scarff rings on nose and midships gunners' cockpits. Type 529A could carry up to twenty 50 lb bombs in mid-fuselage bay, suspended vertically (nose up).
Prototypes: One Type 529, No 3694, first flown at Hamble in April 1917. One Type 529A, No 3695, first flown in October 1917. No production. (Both prototypes stated to have crashed while on test at Martlesham Heath in 1918.)
Показать полностью
P.Lewis British Bomber since 1914 (Putnam)
By 1916 the concept of the multi-seat, twin-engine type had been assessed and accepted as the next inevitable stage in the evolution of the bomber. A. V. Roe made a determined but unsuccessful attempt to enter the field with the Type 523 Pike which was completed in May, 1916, being assembled at Hamble. Roy Chadwick was responsible for the design, and the three-seat Pike was of note as the first Avro type with twin engines, in this case a pair of 160 h.p. Sunbeams mounted at mid-gap as pushers driving two-blade propellers. As a short-range bomber for use by day or night, the bomb load was carried internally and horizontally in the fuselage. The flying surfaces - equal-span, non-staggered, three-bay wings and tail unit - were of typically Avro shape, and the machine was supported on separate undercarriage units beneath the engines. Extension shafts ensured propeller clearance of the trailing edges, and there were rectangular frontal radiators. Cockpits for defensive Lewis machine-guns on rings were installed in the nose and amidships. The Type 523 underwent Admiralty trials on the Isle of Grain.
A second prototype, designated Type 523A and powered by two tractor-mounted, rear-cooled 150 h.p. Green engines, emerged from the erecting shops at Hamble in August, 1916. Despite apparently excellent prospects of adoption as a very useful bomber, neither version of the Pike was ordered, and projected variants - the Sunbeam-powered Type 523B and Rolls-Royce-powered Type 523C - did not materialize.
<...>
Further Admiralty sponsorship of the long-range bomber was evident in 1916, when two developments of the Avro 523 Pike were ordered as the prototypes 529 and 529A. Both machines were constructed at Manchester and erected on the South Coast at Hamble, the 529 being completed in April, 1917, and the 529A six months later in October.
3694, the 529, was slightly the smaller of the pair with a span of 63 ft. as opposed to the 64 ft. 1 in. spread of 3695, the 529A. Each followed the same basic layout of the Pike, receiving three-bay unstaggered wings which could be folded to the rear. In place of the earlier design’s square tips, however, those of the new machines were rounded. The three cockpits were disposed similarly to those of the Pike in the same style of fuselage but in one of slightly greater length. A significant difference between the 529 and the 529A lay in their engines; 3694 was equipped with a pair of 190 h.p. Rolls-Royce Falcons mounted without cowlings at mid-gap, fed with fuel under pressure from a single large tank to the rear of the pilot, while each of the two enclosed 230 h.p. B.H.P. engines of the 529A, mounted on the lower wings, received its fuel independently from its own nacelle-mounted tank by way of a gravity tank installed on the underside of the upper planes. Scarff rings fitted in both gunners’ cockpits facilitated the use of the Lewis guns, and a set of controls in the amidships cockpit enabled the gunner to take over in an emergency. The 529A’s offensive load of twenty vertically-stowed 50 lb. bombs was housed inside the fuselage and was released by the front gunner - who doubled as bomb-aimer - from a prone sighting position in the nose. Despite this second attempt by Avro at producing a competent twin-engine, long- range bomber and the good overall handling reports earned by each machine, the effort expended on the 529 and the 529A was in vain and neither was destined for production.
Показать полностью
J.Bruce British Aeroplanes 1914-1918 (Putnam)
Avro 523, the Pike
THE Pike was the first twin-engined aeroplane to be built by the Avro company. The first machine was tested in May, 1916, and was powered by two Sunbeam engines, each of 160 h.p., which were installed as pushers. The airscrews were driven by extension shafts, and rotated in opposite directions. Wings and tailplane were simple rectangular surfaces with square extremities, and a balanced rudder of generous area was fitted to the large, low aspect-ratio single fin.
The aircraft had good lines and was of advanced conception for its day. Indeed, the basic proportions changed but little between the Pike and the Manchester of 1918, and the family likeness between the two types was pronounced.
The Pike was designed as a bomber, and had a good performance on only 320 h.p. It is not easy to find a reason why the type was not produced in quantity, but it is possible that the Short Bomber had been adopted as the standard R.N.A.S. bombing aircraft by the time the Pike appeared. The fact that the Short machine utilised a number of standard Short 184 components facilitated its production. Moreover, the Handley Page O/100 was in prospect, with the promise of weight-carrying capabilities much greater than those of the Pike.
The first Pike was sent to the R.N.A.S. Station at the Isle of Grain, where it was tested by F. P. Raynham. During an early flight, with R. H. Dobson (later Sir Roy Dobson) in the rear cockpit, the machine proved to be seriously tail-heavy, possibly due to an experimental distribution of loads. The Pike became sufficiently controllable to be landed only because Mr Dobson climbed along the fuselage to the bow cockpit, a performance which was fraught with danger. The transference forward of Dobson s weight enabled Raynham to throttle down the engines without stalling the aircraft, and a successful landing was made.
A second Avro 523 was tested in August, 1916, but differed in having two 150 h.p. Green engines which were installed as tractors. The Pikes were built at A. V. Roe’s Manchester works but were sent to the Hamble experimental works for completion.
SPECIFICATION
Manufacturers: A. V. Roe & Co., Ltd., Clifton Street, Miles Platting, Manchester; final assembly at Hamble works.
Power: Two 160 h.p. Sunbeam (pushers); two 150 h.p. Green (tractors).
Dimensions: Span: 60 ft. Length: 39 ft 1 in. Chord: 7 ft. Gap: 7 ft 3 in. Stagger: nil. Dihedral: 3 30'. Incidence: 4.
Areas: Wings: upper 418 sq ft, lower 397 sq ft, total 815 sq ft. Ailerons: each 30-5 sq ft, total 122 sq ft. Tailplane: 80 sq ft. Elevators: 45 sq ft. Fin: 17-5 sq ft. Rudder: 21 sq ft.
Weights: Empty: 4,000 lb. Loaded: 6,064 lb.
Performance: Maximum speed at ground level: 97 m.p.h.; at 10,000 ft: 88 m.p.h. Climb to 5,000 ft: 9 min 30 sec;
to 10,000 ft: 27 min. Endurance: 7 hours.
Armament: One Lewis machine-gun on rotatable ring-mounting on nose cockpit; a second Lewis gun on a similar mounting on rear cockpit aft of wings. Bombs could be carried.
Avro 529 and 529A
THE Avro 529 and 529A were ordered by the Admiralty in 1916, and were intended for service with the R.N.A.S. as long-range bombers. The type was developed from the earlier Pike and was of similar general layout, having three-bay wing bracing, a single fin and balanced rudder, and the simple but sturdy form of undercarriage first fitted to the Pike. The Type 529 was somewhat larger than its predecessor, however. Like the two Pikes, the 529 and 529A were made at Manchester and assembled at Hamble.
The basic design was a handsome twin-engined tractor biplane which, m its 529A form, had a remarkably good performance. By the time the Avro 529 appeared, the Handley Page O/100 was in service; and the prototype O/400 was flying a few weeks before the 529A was flown. No doubt it was considered undesirable to interfere with O/400 production. However that may be, the Avro design did not proceed beyond the prototype stage.
The 529 was first tested in April, 1917, but it was not until October of that year that the 529A appeared. The 529 and 529A differed principally in the type of engines fitted and in the arrangement of the fuel system. The 529 had two Rolls-Royce Falcon I engines developing 190 h.p. each, driving opposite-handed airscrews; the fuel was carried in a single large pressure tank immediately behind the pilot’s cockpit. The 529A had two 230 h.p. B.H.P. engines mounted directly on to the lower wings: the Falcons of the 529 were at the mid-gap position. The fuel system of the Avro 529A was designed to make each nacelle a self-contained unit: there was a 50-gallon tank in each nacelle, and from it fuel was pumped to a 10-gallon gravity tank directly above the engine. A small wind-driven pump was mounted on top of each nacelle. The two machines had slightly different elevator cable arrangements, and the 529A had a projecting bomb-aimer’s position under the nose. The wings could be folded.
Elevator control on the type was described as poor, and the ailerons were said to be rather heavy. The rudder must have been effective, however, for both the 529 and 529A could be flown straight with one engine out of action. An unusual feature in a machine of this size was the dual control which was installed in the rear gunner’s cockpit. The bombs were carried internally, suspended by their noses, and were aimed and released by the bow gunner, who could communicate with the pilot by means of a speaking tube.
SPECIFICATION
Manufacturers: A. V. Roe & Co., Ltd., Clifton Street, Miles Platting, Manchester; final assembly at Hamble works.
Power: Avro 529: two 190 h.p. Rolls-Royce Falcons, engines Nos. 1/190/201 (port) and 1/190/8 (starboard). Avro 529A: two 230 h.p. B.H.P. (Galloway-built), engines Nos. £15435 and £15442. Dimensions: Span: 63 ft. Length: 39 ft 8 in. Height: 13 ft. Chord: 7 ft 6 in. Gap: 7 ft 3 in. Stagger: nil. Dihedral: 3. Incidence: 3. Span of tail: 18 ft. Wheel track: 12 ft 9 in. Tyres: 900 X 200 mm. Airscrew diameter (Avro 529): 9 ft 11 1/2 in.
Areas: Wings: 922-5 sq ft. Ailerons: each 32-2 sq ft, total 128-8 sq ft. Tailplane: 48-4 sq ft. Elevators: 36-8 sq ft. Fin: 10 sq ft. Rudder: 24-5 sq ft.
Weights (lb) and Performance without Bombs:
Avro 529 Avro 529A
No. of Trial Report M.110 M.155
Date of Trial Report June, 1917 November, 1917
Type of airscrew used on trial A. V. Roe, 4834 and 4824 -
Weight empty 4.376 -
Military load 273 273
Crew 540 540
Fuel and oil 1,120 -
Loaded 6,309 6,323
Maximum speed (m.p.h.) at
8,000 ft 94 -
10,000 ft 89 106
13,000 ft 81-5 -
14,000 ft 79'5 -
15,000 ft - 93
m. s. m. s.
Climb to
1,000 ft 1 25 - -
6,500 ft 11 25 9 50
10,000 ft 21 40 17 20
12,000 ft 31 05 - -
14,000 ft 48 05 - -
15,000 ft - - 35 05
Service ceiling (feet) 13,500 17,500
Endurance (hours) 5 5
Tankage :
Petrol 140 gallons in pres- Main:
sure tank in 2 X 50 gallons
fuselage Service:
2x10 gallons Total: 120 gallons
Oil 7 gallons per engine; -
total 14 gallons
Water 8 gallons per engine; -
total 16 gallons
Armament: One Lewis machine-gun on a Scarff ring-mounting on front cockpit; a second Lewis gun on a Scarff ring-mounting was fitted to the cockpit aft of the wings. The bomb load of the Avro 529A could consist of twenty 50-lb bombs stowed internally within the fuselage, between the spars of the lower wing. The bombs were suspended by their noses.
Serial Numbers: Avro 529: 3694. Avro 529A: 3695. Both machines were built under Contract No. C.P. 122495/16/X/23723.
Показать полностью
H.King Armament of British Aircraft (Putnam)
Pike. Bearing the type number 523, the Pike was built in 1916 as a formidable fighter, stoutly armed, of long endurance, and capable of bringing heavy fire power to bear upon airships. Lights were also installed to this end. Only later does the type appear to have been developed for bombing. The nose was designed to take, and actually had installed on at least one occasion, a large-calibre quick-firing gun, apparently of Hotchkiss type. In a second Pike this gun was replaced by a Lewis gun on a ring-mounting, but in both examples the rear gunner had a Lewis gun, likewise ring-mounted. Bombs could certainly be carried on the Pike, and A.V. Roe himself is said to have designed the horizontal tier-stowage.
529 and 529A. These aeroplanes, of 1916/17, were specifically long-range bombers. Located between the lower wing spars, the bomb compartment was of three-ply and could take twenty 50-lb bombs, suspended by their noses. A bombsight and release gear were installed in the nose, and on the 529A at least the bomb-aimer appears to have assumed a prone position in a jutting structure. He communicated with the pilot by speaking tube. Scarff ring-mountings, with one Lewis gun each, were fitted at the nose and dorsal positions, but the gunner who manned the dorsal ring was also responsible for a third Lewis gun which fired through the floor. A contemporary document stated:
'A special seat is made in the floor through the rear cockpit and a long hole is arranged in the floor through which a good view downward and backward is obtained. When it is not required to use this opening it is covered by a sliding door.#
The same account listed the following weights: guns, 70 lb; ammunition, 100 lb; bombs, 1.080 lb.
Показать полностью
Jane's All The World Aircraft 1919
Flown for the first time in May 1916, the Pike three-seat twin-engined biplane was designed primarily to meet an Admiralty requirement for a long-range escort and anti-airship fighter. The pilot was seated just ahead of the main-planes with gunners' cockpits, each with a free-mounted 0-303-in (7,7-mm) Lewis, fore and aft. Of wooden construction with fabric skinning, the first prototype Pike had two 150-hp Sunbeam eight-cylinder liquid-cooled engines mounted as pushers driving two-bladed airscrews via extension shafts. A second Pike, the Avro 523A, differed primarily in having two 150 hp Green six-cylinder liquid-cooled engines driving tractor airscrews, and a Scarff-type ring mounting for the forward Lewis gun. No production of the Pike was ordered following completion of official trials.
Avro 523
Max speed 97 mph (156 km/h) at sea level
88 mph (142 km/h) at 10,000 ft (3 050 m).
Time
to 5,000 ft (1 524 m) 9.5 min,
to 10,000 ft (3 050 m) 27 min.
Endurance 7 hr.
Empty weight 4,000 lb (1 814 kg).
Loaded weight 6,064 lb (2 751 kg).
Span 60 ft 0 in (18,29 m).
Length 39 ft 1 in (11,91 m).
Height 11 ft 8 in (3,55 m).
Wing area 815 sq ft (75,71 m2).
Показать полностью
W.Green, G.Swanborough The Complete Book of Fighters
AVRO 523 PIKE UK
Flown for the first time in May 1916, the Pike three-seat twin-engined biplane was designed primarily to meet an Admiralty requirement for a long-range escort and anti-airship fighter. The pilot was seated just ahead of the mainplanes with gunners’ cockpits, each with a free-mounted 0.303-in (7,7-mm) Lewis, fore and aft. Of wooden construction with fabric skinning, the first prototype Pike had two 150 hp Sunbeam eight-cylinder liquid-cooled engines mounted as pushers driving two-bladed propellers via extension shafts. A second Pike, the Avro 523A, differed primarily in having two 150 hp Green six-cylinder liquid-cooled engines driving tractor propellers and a Scarff-type ring mounting for the forward Lewis gun. No production of the Pike was ordered following completion of official trials. The following data relate to the Avro 523.
Max speed, 97 mph (156 km/h) at sea level, 88 mph (142 km/h) at 10,000 ft (3 050 m).
Time to 5,000 ft (1525 m), 9.5 min, to 10,000 ft (3 050 m), 27 min.
Endurance, 7hrs.
Empty weight, 4,000 lb (1814 kg).
Loaded weight, 6,0641b (2 751kg).
Span, 60 ft 0 in (18,29 m).
Length, 39 ft 1 in (11,91m).
Height, 11 ft 8 in (3,55m).
Wing area, 815 sqft (75,71m2).
Показать полностью
Журнал Flight
Flight, March 20, 1919.
"MILESTONES"
The Avro Machines
The Avro "Pike." May, 1916
This machine was the first Avro twin-engined machine to be built, and was intended for work as a three-seater fighter. The general arrangement will be clear from the accompanying diagrams. The pilot occupied the middle seat, while a gunner was placed in the nose of the fuselage, and one well aft, about half-way between the planes and the tail. From the tables it will be seen that the "Pike" had a very good performance, considering that she only had a total h.p. of 320, the power plant consisting of two Sunbeam engines each of 160 h.p. In plan the machine was very similar to the standard single-engined Avros, with rectangular planes and tail, with the corners rounded off. The machine had an adjustable tail, rotatable gun rings, and bomb racks. The pusher airscrews were carried on extension shafts from the engines, and rotated in opposite directions. Considering the time of testing the first machine, May, 1916, and the good performance for its power, it is not immediately obvious why the type was not at once put into production, but the fact remains that it was not, immediately or at any time. The solution does not emerge from the table of performances, which would certainly appear to justify its production in quantities.
Contemporary with the "Pike," another machine, which was really her sister 'plane, was going through the works. This machine was, however, fitted with two Green engines of 150 h.p. each. Also the airscrews were tractors instead of pushers. This machine was tested in August, 1916. A third machine on very similar lines, but totally different in detail design, was fitted with two Rolls-Royce engines of 190 h.p. each. This was known as the 529 type, and was first tested in April, 1917. One of the accompanying photographs shows these three machines lined up, the one on the left being the "Pike," that in the middle the Green engined machine, and the one nearest the camera the 529.
The Three-Seater Bomber, Type 529A. October, 1917.
The reason for the apparent break in the series, by which the two-seater fighter, type 530, comes before the 529A, is to be found in the fact that these two machines were going through the works at the same time, and the type 530 was finished a short time before the other machine. The type 529A is a sister plane to the Rolls-Royce engined machine. From the table of performances it will be seen that both speed and climb of this machine were very good indeed, while at the same time she had a good range of action (556 miles at 10,000 ft.). She would therefore have made a good long-distance bomber, and should have been coming through in quantities in the spring and early summer of 1918. From the plan view of the machine it will be seen that the wings were arranged so as to be capable of being folded back, thus economising storage room. The pilot sat just ahead of the leading edge of the planes, while a gunner was placed in the nose of the fuselage, and another gunner well aft, whence he had a good field for his machine gun. The engines fitted were Galloway B.H.Ps., of 220 h.p. each. As shown in the illustrations the engines were very neatly covered in, and drove tractor screws, running in the same direction.
Показать полностью