
Описание
Страна: США
Год: 1918
Fighter
J.Wegg General Dynamics Aircraft and Their Predecessors Since 1912 (Putnam)
MB-1
After concentrating on trainers, attention was turned to an experimental two-seat, high-wing parasol monoplane (Mono-Biplane) fighter, powered by a 400hp Liberty 12. Faired struts offered additional lifting area and in an effort to make the airframe as light as possible, all metal parts were given holes and the plywood bulkheads had cut-out sections. Even the control column was perforated.
Two aircraft were ordered (including one for static tests only) in 1918 and built at the Center Street building. But by the time the prototype had reached the flying field, towed behind a truck, the undercarriage had already been weakened and repairs had to be made. When the aircraft sat in the hangar, the tailskid fittings failed and the skid was pushed through the tail. Taxi-ing and flight tests were begun on the ice of Cayuga Lake but the undercarriage failed on take-off on its first flight. The MB-1 was repaired and flown only once more, then abandoned.
Span 37ft; length 22ft.
Описание:
- J.Wegg General Dynamics Aircraft and Their Predecessors Since 1912 (Putnam)
- W.Green, G.Swanborough The Complete Book of Fighters
- J.Forsgren The Thomas-Morse MB-3 (A Centennial Perspective on Great War Airplanes 60)
Фотографии
-
J.Herris - Weird Wings of WWI /Centennial Perspective/ (70)
The Thomas-Morse MB-1 seen during ground trials. Note that no propeller seems to befitted.
Designed as a two-seat fighter, the Thomas-Morse MB-1 monoplane was so poorly designed that the Army's only interest was evaluating its parasol wing. Like most American designs of the time it used the Liberty V-12 of 400 hp. Its landing gear collapsed on its first take-off attempt, and it crashed on its first test flight due to being much too tail heavy. In addition, the pilot's field of view was very poor and the design was abandoned. -
W.Green, G.Swanborough - The Complete Book of Fighters
Constructed in such a fashion as to save as much weight as possible, the MB-1 proved structurally inadequate and was only flown twice.
-
J.Herris - Weird Wings of WWI /Centennial Perspective/ (70)
The Thomas-Morse MB-1 prototype during engine trials. The abnormally large wing struts would surely have reduced the pilot's downward view. Via Jack Herris
-
J.Forsgren - The Thomas-Morse MB-3 /Centennial Perspective/ (60)
A three-quarter view of the Thomas-Morse MB-1. Via Jack Herris
-
W.Green, G.Swanborough - The Complete Book of Fighters
Over-zealous lightening of the airframe made the MB-1 structurally unsound.
-
J.Forsgren - The Thomas-Morse MB-3 /Centennial Perspective/ (60)
A front view of the Thomas-Morse MB-1. Via Jack Herris