Книги

Centennial Perspective
M.Dusing
German Aviation Industry in WWI. Volume 2
195

M.Dusing - German Aviation Industry in WWI. Volume 2 /Centennial Perspective/ (85)

Etrich-Taube with Mercedes D.I.
Advertisement (1913)
Typical wing design of Etrich-Taube.
The first AEG aeroplane was powered by a 75 hp Korting 8SL116 (V8) engine (1910).
Schwade compressor installed on a Mercedes D.IVa installed in a AEG G.IV aircraft.
Schwade compressor boosting a Daimler D.IVa engine on an AEG G.IV aircraft (1918).
Ago C.IV(Schul) (1916)
Ago-built Ago C.IV. Ten were ordered from Rathgeber but were not completed and were reduced to spare parts.
An early production Ago C.IV on its nose. The two-color camouflage scheme is evident but not very distinct. It was in the initial production configuration - no fixed fin, ailerons on the upper wing only, and the forward inboard interplane struts normally seen on two-bay aircraft were omitted. The camouflage extended to the rudder. The airfoil radiator is offset to the right and the gravity tank is on the left. (Bruno Schmaling)
Albatros Wasser-Militar-Zweidecker (WMZ) No. 2 with NAG 4-cylinder 100 hp F3 engine. With this aircraft (navy number D.5), the navy undertook its first flight tests to test radio telegraphy.
Albatros B.II(Mer) (1916/17)
Albatros C.III with FT generator mounted on the undercarriage and Wolff propeller.
Albatros C.III(Bay) repaired by Alter in Darmstadt.
Albatros D.III powered by 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine and "Wotan" propeller.
An extremely rare image, taken sometime after 15 April 1918, showing an Albatros D III fitted with additional small, load-spreading ancillary struts at the lower end of the normal 'V' interplane struts, clearly aimed at alleviating the high speed flutter problem. As these added struts have never appeared in any other picture of an Albatros D III seen by the author, he suspects that this fit was a locally devised modification.
Albatros D.III with Axial propeller.
This image of Offstv Edmund Nathanael, standing with his Albatros D III of Jasta 5, helps point up the fact that non-commissioned ranks formed a significant part of the total flying personnel strength, although perhaps less so in fighter units than elsewhere. Nathanael had scored 14 confirmed before being killed near Bourlon on 17 May 1917.
Edmund Nathanael in front of his Albatros D.III at Boistrancourt in March 1917 equipped with an Axial propeller. Edmund Nathanael was Jewish.
Albatros D.Va on display at the NASM. The Daimler D.III series engines powered all production Albatros fighters.
Mobelfabrik Ludwig Alter, Section Aircraft Construction, Darmstadt

Foundation:

  The upholsterer and decorator Johann Justus Ludwig Alter (1847 - 1908) initially founded a small business for the sale of furniture in 1871. After the founder's death, his children Frieda and Heinrich Alter and his son-in-law Emil Glockler took over the business. From 1915 to 1918, the Alter furniture factory also manufactured war vehicles and other army equipment of all kinds. In addition, the company specialised in the inspection and repair of military aircraft from 1915 onwards.


Aircraft development:

  With their own resources, i.e. without the help of more experienced aircraft manufacturers, Alter developed a single-seater fighter "A.I" with a fully enclosed 110 hp Goebel Goe.II engine. The biplane, a copy of Nieuport, was flown in February 1917 by the company pilot Georg Sell, but was not accepted by the Inspectorate of Air Force due to the underpowered Goebel engine.
1913: Eight by Schwade under license built Aviatik P.20 aircraft. These aircraft were exclusively used in Schwade's flight school.
Mercedes D.IIIa were used on Aviatik C.III aircraft.
The Daimler L11 fighter was a development of 1918. It used the Mercedes D.IIIb V8-engine.
The picture shows a refurbished DFW C.V. aircraft. Unfortunately, it is not possible to see which anniversary is being celebrated by the Alter management.
Aircraft graveyard at Pfalz Flugzeugwerke in 1919. The Pfal D.IV prototype (left on ground) was destroyed as well as the DFW C.V (832/17).
The fuselage of the Pfalz D.IV rests in a pile of airplane parts. The D.IV was a D.III fitted with an experimental 195 hp Benz Bz.IIIb V-8 engine. Unfortunately, the engine was not ready for production and test results were disappointing.
Opel August Euler presents his biplane (equipped with 70 hp 4-cylinder Opel piston engine) to Prinz Heinrich, 1911. This motor was the only own development by Adam Opel KG.
August Euler's Taube with Argus As I engine. (1913).
One of four aircraft hangars for storage and repair purposes at Norderney. In front: Gotha WD14 and an Euler D.II (274/17).
Flugwerk Deutschland Munich Pfeil biplane with four cylinder Rapp Motor.
Fokker D.II with Garuda propeller.
Fokker D.VI single-seater fighter with 110 hp Oberursel UR II and Axial propeller
"Фоккер" D.VII №461/18 на испытаниях в Адлерсхофе.
A Fokker built D.VIIF with BMW IIIa(O) in the lozenge type camouflaged fabric. The lozenge pattern was printed on the fabric after it was made and before it was applied to the airframe.
Replica of v. Richthofen's "Red Baron", equipped with Wohlert propeller (Deutsches Museum Munchen). Close-up of the propeller with the "Wohlert" trademark.
The Fokker Dr.I triplane was the most famous user of the Oberursel UR II.
Lt. Josef Jacobs Fokker Dr.I marked with the "devil's head". The first person on the left behind the fuselage is Peter, the artist who painted the "devil's head" and many of the other emblems of both Jagdstaffel 7 and Jagdstaffel 40.
Fokker D.III (DR.I, Dr.512/17) with 110 hp Oberursel UR II and Axial propeller.
Fokker Dr.I with Goebel Goe II.
Leutnant Eric Loewenhardt in front of his Fokker Dr.I with Axial propeller. Loewenhardt commanded Jasta 10, was credited with 53/54 victories, and was awarded the Pour le Merite. He was killed in action when he bailed out of his Fokker D.VII after a mid-air collision with a fellow pilot and his parachute failed to open.
Fdh FF4 (1913). This (now) 2-seater aircraft was also sold to the teacher Ehrler. The wings and the tail unit had the typical "Tauben" shape. Only one copy was built.
Fdh FF8 (1913). The design also came from Kober. The first flight took place in June 1913. The single-seater aircraft was specially designed for the 1913 Lake Constance hydroplane competition. It had two floats with a step (volume 460 liters, length 3.50 m, width: 0.50 m). Only one aircraft was built.
This FF9 from 1912 had a central float and was powered by a NAG engine.
Fdh FF9 (1913). The two-seater FF9 with central float was commissioned as a "racing biplane" for the 1913 Lake Constance seaplane competition. Compared to the FF1, it was considerably smaller, but had a more powerful engine (140 HP NAG). The ailerons were located in the upper wings. Only one copy was built.
Fdh FF15 (1914). The FF15 was a design by Theodor Kober, which essentially corresponded to the FF9 (also with regard to the engine), but did not have a wheeled undercarriage. There was also a canopy in front of the pilot's seat as wind protection. Ony one FF15 was built.
Fdh FF11 (1913/14). In February 1913, the Reichs-Marineamt suggested the construction of a two-seater flying boat. The hull was supplied by the Oertz shipyard. The aircraft was completed in February 1914 and was tested on Lake Constance until May 1914. It was transferred to Kiel shortly afterwards, where further flight tests were carried out. The flight performance of the FF11 exceeded that of the flying boats previously tested in Kiel. Only one was built.
The FF11 was Friedrichshafen's first flying boat. The hull was built by the Oertz yacht works and the similarity to Oertz flying boats is obvious. The similarly-powered FF9 had notably better performance than the FF11 due to the flying boat's greater size and weight. The SVK assigned Marine Number 41 to the FF11.
Fdh FF21 (1914). Developed from the FF11 for the Warnemunde seaplane competition in 1914. The hull had a length of 6.5 m and was 2.6 m wide. The design was by engineer Kemmerich. The 150 hp Benz engine was housed deep inside the boat and drove the 4-bladed tractor propeller via a bevel gear. The first flight took place in July 1914. Series production did not take place.
Fdh FF17a/b (1914). Developed for the 2nd Lake Constance Competition 1914 (May 24-30,1914). The FF17 was the first fuselage biplane with a front-mounted engine from FF.
Fdh FF17b (1914). In the further course of flight testing, the central float was replaced by a pair of floats. Subsequently, only this design was used (except FF27, which was already built).
Fdh FF27 (1914). This two-seater seaplane biplane was also designed by Th. Kober for the Warnemunde seaplane competition. (135 hp NAG engine).
The FF27 was a refinement of earlier Friedrichshafen pusher biplanes; the one built was accepted by the German Navy and assigned Marine Number 62. Wheels could be attached as shown for easier ground handling. The drag-creating pusher configuration was little used by German manufacturers after the war started. Pushers had good visibility for the crew but were too slow. Later, when air-to-air combat became more common, pushers were too vulnerable to attack from the rear.
Fdh FF29A (1914). The FF29A (series 5) had a redesigned fin and rudder.
Fdh FF31 (1915). Also in service with the Imperial Navy were two space fraim biplanes (Navy numbers 274 and 275), each equipped with a 160 hp Maybach Mb.III engine. The first flight took place on April 12, 1915. The two aircraft were not used at the front. This was a last attempt with a rear-mounted, pusher engine.
Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen, Manzell near Friedrichshafen (Fdh)

  On June 25,1912, the company "Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen" was founded by Dipl.-Ing. Kober as a limited liability company. Count v. Zeppelin was also a shareholder in the company. In addition to the main factory in Friedrichshafen, the company also had a department in Weingarten (Wurttemberg) and a shipyard in Warnemunde.


Aircraft Development:

  As already mentioned, the company was primarily engaged in the construction of seaplanes. Of them, worth mentioning are:
   FF 33 with 150 hp Benz and 160 hp Mercedes engine, 1913/15 for bombing, wireless telegraphy and machine gun;
<...>
  Repeatedly, pilots could be rescued after engine failures, their planes sometimes floating around in capsized condition for days on the North Sea. The bombing flights over London and other cities and installations in England and Belgium also testified to the usefulness of these aircraft.
<...>
Fdh FF33B (FF33D ???) (1915)
Norderney. There are at least eight floatplanes in this line up. NW 525, and Friedrichshafen FF 33E 715 and 727 can be identified.
Final assembly of FF39 (587) and FF33E (721) in the old Zeppelin hangar in Manzell near Friedrichshafen.
FF33H #687 meets a German submarine at sea.
Fdh FF33J (1916-18). FF33J: Sea reconnaissance aircraft with 150 hp Benz Bz III. This type was an improved FF33E, with F.T. equipment.
Fdh FF35 (1916). On March 24, 1915, the R.M.A. ordered a "torpedo aircraft", which later became known as the FF35. In this type, the engine support against the fuselage and float was independent of the airframe structure. The end of the fuselage was keeled out of plywood to form a tail float. The tailplane was very high to protect it from splashing water. The main fittings for the airframe, fuselage and float were forged from solid steel. Only one example was built.
Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen, Manzell near Friedrichshafen (Fdh)


Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Next to them, the twin-engine large combat aircraft distinguished themselves. The Friedrichshafen large aircraft were similar to the somewhat better-known Gotha large aircraft, but were somewhat smaller and differed in the shape of the wingtips and tailplane. Mainly the types Fdh G.II (FF38) as well as the Fdh G.III (FF45) enjoyed great popularity at the front due to their maneuverability and good landing characteristics as night planes, especially as bomber planes for bombs up to a weight of 1,000 kg. These aircraft were used over Dunkirk, Calais and Paris, among other places.
<...>
Fdh FF38 (G.II) (1916). Two 200 hp Benz Bz.IV engines powered the second large aircraft from Friedrichshafen. A total of 9 aircraft were manufactured at Lake Constance, with a further 17 built under license by Daimler.
Apparently the Friedrichshafen G.II prototype with early vertical tail surfaces. (Peter M. Bowers Collection, Museum of Flight)
Fdh FF45 (G.III) (1917). The Fdh G.III was a successful large land bomber, of which 134 were built. The type test was successfully completed on April 17, 1917. The aircraft used two 260 hp Mercedes D.IVa engines. It was built under license by Daimler in Sindelfingen, Caspar in Hamburg, Oeffag Wiener-Neustadt, and, at the end of 1918, by the Gothaer Waggonfabrik.
Friedrichshafen G.IIIa was equipped with Niendorf propellers (diameter 3.08 m). They consisted of nine layers, alternating ash and walnut; one leaf seems to be maple. The screw wing ends had 25 cm long brass fittings, the pitch of the propeller was 1.8 m and the maximum blade width was 22 cm.
Fdh FF45 (G.IIIa) (1917). In the spring of 1918, the G.III was redesigned as the G.IIIa. The payload was 1,500 kg. The G.IIIa received a box-shaped tail unit and the "Gotha" firing channel, the "AEG gasoline circuit", MG stations with open pivot. The machine gunners/observers had a passageway from the front part of the fuselage to the rear. Radio communication was possible from the front and rear MG stations.
Fdh D.I (FF46) (1916/17). The design for this single seater landplane fighter came from engineer Eisenlohr in 1916. Only three test aircraft were built.
Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen, Manzell near Friedrichshafen (Fdh)


Aircraft Development:

  As already mentioned, the company was primarily engaged in the construction of seaplanes. Of them, worth mentioning are:
<...>
   FF 39, 200 hp Benz engine, with installation of bombs and a mobile machine gun;
<...>
  Repeatedly, pilots could be rescued after engine failures, their planes sometimes floating around in capsized condition for days on the North Sea. The bombing flights over London and other cities and installations in England and Belgium also testified to the usefulness of these aircraft.
<...>
Final assembly of FF39 (587) and FF33E (721) in the old Zeppelin hangar in Manzell near Friedrichshafen.
Fdh FF40 (1916). This experimental aircraft FF40 from 1917 had two propellers driven by one 240 hp Maybach Mb.IV engine centrally located in the fuselage. Power was transmitted by means of a ZF bevel gear. The flight characteristics were good, only the reversing gears were too heavy and also prone to failure. Series production did not take place.
The single 240 hp Maybach Mb.IV engine in the FF40 drove two propellers via ZF bevel gears and propeller shafts. The FF40 was ordered in March 1916 and, despite its relatively complex power system, was quickly built and flown. First flight is reported to be in April 1916 with delivery to the SVK in August 1916.
Fdh FF41A (1916). The FF41 was the counterpart to the FF40. Due to the positive experience with the FF38 (Fdh G.II), two Benz Bz.III engines were used. In contrast to the FF41 AT (#996-1000,1208-1210), the FF.41 A (#678) had slightly shorter but wider floats.
Fdh FF44 (1915).The only FF.44 (#117) was a design by Th. Kober from 1917. This experimental aircraft (rebuilt from the FF.34) was completely revised for the purpose of testing the new Maybach engine. After intensive testing, the design was abandoned as new prototypes made further tests unnecessary.
Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen, Manzell near Friedrichshafen (Fdh)


Aircraft Development:

  As already mentioned, the company was primarily engaged in the construction of seaplanes. Of them, worth mentioning are:
<...>
   FF 49, 200 hp Mercedes engine, for installation of a fixed machine gun in the front and a movable one in the rear. The seaplanes were distinguished by great seaworthiness.
<...>
  Repeatedly, pilots could be rescued after engine failures, their planes sometimes floating around in capsized condition for days on the North Sea. The bombing flights over London and other cities and installations in England and Belgium also testified to the usefulness of these aircraft.
<...>
Fdh FF49C (1917/18). On November 20, 1917, the first of a total of 238 FF49C aircraft took off. Despite its robust, almost cumbersome appearance, this new type had significant improvements over the FF39. Eventually, the FF49C became the Kaiserliche Marine's standard high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft. This type could remain in the air for almost 6 hours. It was built under license by Sablatnig, L.F.G. (Koslin) - 105 units, and also by Gotha at the end of 1918.
A license built Fdh FF49C was modified to a passenger airplane to be operated by Luftverkehr Sablatnig.
Fdh FF49B (1917). This sea bomber with 200 hp Benz Bz IV was a further development of the FF 33. It had three parallel struts, lower wings each with a pair of struts braced to the fuselage (instead of tension cable crossings) to create a free field of fire for the movable machine gun in the front seat. Built in 1917, wingspan 17.35 m, length 11.52 m, empty weight 1432 kg, flying weight 2100 kg, top speed 152 km/h.
Fdh D.II (FF54) (1918). In 1916, at the suggestion of Idflieg, the Deutsche Versuchsanstalt fur Luftfahrt (DVL) carried out comparative flights between double-, triple- and quad-deck aircraft. In addition to Friedrichshafen, the companies Euler, Fokker, and Albatros took part in these tests. The results showed the superiority of the biplanes. The first flight of the FF.54 in May 1918 ended in a fatal crash.
Fdh N.I (1916). Night bomber, 260 hp Daimler DIVa, two-bay biplane, only prototype built in 1917.
Fdh FF59A (1918). The FF 59 was developed from the FF 49 and, like the latter, was a slightly larger version of the successful FF33 with a more powerful engine. The R.M.A. placed an order on August 27, 1917, and two examples were built with the navy numbers 1822 and 1823. Number 1822 was equipped with an "inverted", i.e. downward-set fin similar to the fin of the Hansa-Brandenburg W.12 in order to give the gunner a larger field of fire to the rear.
Fdh FF63 (1918). Following the success of the HaBra two-seater fighters which had an excellent field of fire as a low-wing monoplane, Kober also built such a low-wing monoplane at the request of the R.M.A.. However, this was braced to the floats.
Powered by the 200 hp Benz Bz.IV, the Friedrichshafen FF63 appears to be a fair design that just does not match the innovative structural design of the W29 and W33 that were its competitors. The additional bracing struts above the wing and the struts above the fuselage added weight and drag that the Brandenburg monoplanes avoided. The tail was made of fabric-covered steel tubing, a major innovation for Friedrichshafen.
Fdh FF67 (1918/19). The FF67 was the last further development of the 33/39/49/59 series with a 260 hp Mercedes engine. The prototype was completed in mid-December 1918, fitted with a simple passenger cabin in March 1919 and sold abroad.
The FF67 after the passenger cabin had been added. (Peter M. Bowers Collection, Museum of Flight)
Fdh FF71 (1918/19). Sea biplane, 200 hp Benz Bz IV, similar to the the FF 49C, prototype built in 1918, later fitted with passenger cabin.
This military Taube of Alk-Werke, a branch of Garuda-Prpellerbau, was presented at the ALA in Berlin in 1912. The forward-curved propeller blades are clearly visible. The Taube was equipped with two- and four-blade Garuda propellers. Nothing has become known about any notable successes of this aircraft.
This military Taube of Alk-Werke, a branch of Garuda-Prpellerbau, was presented at the ALA in Berlin in 1912. The forward-curved propeller blades are clearly visible. The Taube was equipped with two- and four-blade Garuda propellers. Any successes are unknown.
Gotha LD4 (1914), improved Caudron copy with Integral propeller (Chauviere design).
Gotha WD 2, #424 with Integral propeller and Parabellum LMG 14.
Detailed view of the gun turret installation on a WD2.
Gotha G.I with 2 counter-rotating Benz Bz.III engines and Reschke propeller.
The Gotha UWD at the factory prior to shipment to the SVK at Warnemunde on 30 December 1915.
The Gotha UWD (WD4, Navy No.120) was also equipped with Integral propellers in 1916.
The Gotha WD 7 had two Daimler D.II engines and two integral propellers (1915/16).
Gotha WD 8 with Reschke propeller and 240 hp Maybach Mb.IVa engine.
Front view of Gotha WD8 Marine Number 476 in the Gotha factory pond. The sole WD8 was assigned to Zeebrugge, where it was judged "totally unsuitable" for operations due to sluggish maneuverability, a poor field of fire for the rear gunner due to the large, complex tail surfaces, and insufficient fuel capacity. After a few months of operations the commander of Seeflugstation Zeebrugge requested the WD8 be removed from front-line service.
This Gotha WD.12a, Marine No.944 was equipped with Daimler D.III engine and Reschke propeller.
The Gotha WD 14 prototype (Navy No. 801) was powered by two integral propellers and 220 hp Benz engines (1916/17).
The prototype WD14, Marine Number 801, on a beaching dolly upon delivery to the SVK on 16 January 1917. This aircraft has a rear gunner but no nose turret; the pilot and observer sat side-by-side.
Something of an all-rounder, the Gotha WD 14 is seen here in prototype form, wearing its naval serial 801. First flown in January 1917, this twin 220hp Benz Bz IV three seater was designed to fulfil the roles of torpedo bomber, minelayer, or long range reconnaissance. Top level speed was 72mph at sea level, while the range was an impressive 806 miles. Following satisfactory testing and acceptance of the prototype, a further 68 production WD 14s were delivered with the navy serials 1415-1430, 1617-1631, 1651-62 and 1946-1970.
One of four aircraft hangars for storage and repair purposes at Norderney. In front: Gotha WD14 and an Euler D.II (274/17).
Oberursel U0 (80 hp) installed in a Halberstadt B.I.
Norderney. There are at least eight floatplanes in this line up. NW 525, and Friedrichshafen FF 33E 715 and 727 can be identified.
Karl Jatho, himself living in Hannover, installed a modified 30 hp Korting car engine in his Jatho IV aircraft (1909).
This Roland D.III powered by an Argus As.III engine was photographed on June 13, 1917 at Roland's Kaiserdamm facility. This aircraft was used to test different airfoils in an effort to improve flight performance. The D.III was the third configuration of the first Roland fighter generation, all part of a continued search for better visibility for the pilot. The D.I, D.II, and D.III all had a pair of synchronized machine guns mounted inside the fuselage for minimum drag, but these were difficult for the pilots to access in flight to clear jams, which occurred frequently. The fighters also shared the same structural technology and the 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine, although many D.II and D.III fighters used the 180 hp Argus As.III as the Mercedes was in great demand for many other aircraft types. Flight performance, maneuverability, and handling qualities for these very similar fighters were also nearly identical.
LFG tested the Korting Kg IIIa in its Roland D.XIII.
The Roland D.XIII fighter prototype was similar to the earlier D.VI, D.VII, and D.VIII prototypes, but used a different engine, the experimental 195 hp Korting Kg.III V-8.This engine failed to reach production, dooming the D.XIII.
Early LVG monoplane designed by Franz Schneider (1913/14).
The Rapp II engine was tested in flight in a LVG B.I.
Turret for the movable MG in LVG two-seater C-airplane.
LVG D.III with Nag C.IIIa 185 hp 6-cylinder, Garuda propeller.
Excellent restored Wolff propeller on a LVG C.VI replica. Engine: Benz Bz.IV.
Mercur-Flugzeugbau GmbH, Berlin-Neukolln (Merc)

Foundation:

  The company was founded on April 15, 1915, under the above name by Romeo Wankmuller (owner), Hermann Tradowsky (managing director) and Mr. Tiege. As a subsidiary with foundation date March 7,1917, the “Mercur-Motorenbau GmbH” was established, which was engaged in trials of an engine designed by the company itself.


Aircraft Development:

  In parallel with the orders for new Alb B.II and Alb C.Ib aircraft already mentioned above, the company attempted to bring out a fighter aircraft as its own design as early as the summer of 1917, which made it as far as its test flights, but was not satisfactory overall. As a result of this failure, the company started to design a “Type CL” aircraft, the development of which could not be completed by the end of the war, despite good flight characteristics.
  The experimental department of the Mercur factory was quite active. The following projects were pursued:
  1. Fighter single-seater (Kampf-Einsitzer) KE 2, The aircraft was brought to Johannisthal for flight testing in March 1918. However, necessary modifications prevented successful flight testing.
  2. Aircraft torpedo.The project, detailed designs, and detailed description were submitted to the Idflieg. The fuselage and wings were completed, but the project was not finished.
  3. Light fighter CL.II.The project and complete construction drawings were completed, as was prototype construction. The required supercharged 200 hp Benz Bz.IVu engine had been available since April 1918. It is not known whether flight testing took place.
  4. Fighter single-seater Type D (biplane) Prototype construction was started. Nothing is known about the completion or the beginning of a flight test.
  5. Single-seater KE 3 (monoplane) Such a project was started, but not completed.
  6. Single-seater KE 4 (monoplane with rotary engine). Such a project was in the planning stage.
  7. Giant airplane. This 1918 project of a giant airplane was to be equipped with four 260 hp Mercedes D.IVa engines. Six machine guns and 2,000 bombs were to be carried on board
  8. Tachometer: Mercur Kinergometer
  9. Mercur engine (Mercus-Motorenbau GmbH). This 350 hp stationary engine was about to be tested at the end of the war. As a result of the construction restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles, further development of this powerful engine had to be discontinued after the war. Only the Mercur KE 2 and CL.II projects were realized.
  But there was no time to finish the aircraft, and under surrender conditions the prototype KE 2 and CL 2 fighters were destroyed in May 1920.
<...>
Mercur CL.II; the only original Mercur design for which photos can be found is this large, two-bay biplane of somewhat unusual configuration. The fuselage filled the gap between wings and the pilot sat in front of the upper wing. Side radiators were apparently used. The nose is very slim with no engine visible, indicating the propeller was driven by an extension shaft with the engine buried in the fuselage behind the pilot. (Peter M. Grosz collection, STDB)
The only example of a Mercur CLII equipped with a 200 hp Benz Bz.IVu.
The mid 1918 national insignia is consistent its April 1918 completion date. The engine was a 200 hp Benz Bz.IVu, and the streamlined fuselage appears to be made of shaped plywood in the manner of the Pfalz fighters. No fixed machine-gun is visible, which may be due to the aircraft being a prototype. In May 1920 the Inter-Allied Aeronautical Commission ordered destruction of the KE.I, KE.II, CL.I, and CL.II. (Peter M. Grosz collection, STDB)
Mercur-Flugzeugbau GmbH, Berlin-Neukolln (Merc)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  An especially interesting project was the above-mentioned project of a giant airplane. Since the technical documentation of the Mercur company was lost over the years, no construction drawings have survived. Preserved patents allow conclusions about the construction. The accompanying drawing for patent 326430 of March 6, 1918, shows the unusual design. Four engines with a projected total power of 1040 hp were to drive two coaxial propellers.
Model of Mercur Giant aircraft, made by Russian aircraft enthusiasts.
Patent drawing of a Mercur giant aircraft powered by 4 Merc. D.IVa (together 1000 hp).
Norddeutsche Flugzeugwerke, Teltow i. Mark

Foundation:

  On 1 August 1916, Anton Niermann founded the company Norddeutsche Flugzeugwerke by taking over Union Flugzeugwerke, which had existed since 1912. The managing director was Anton Niermann, formerly a landowner in Berlin-Wilmersdorf.


Aircraft Development:

  Initially, a training biplane (C-type) with a 150 hp Benz Bz.III engine was developed in 1915. There was no flight development of its own, as repairs were carried out according to the specifications of the original manufacturers.
Max Oertz, Jachtwerft, Neuhof-Reiherstieg (Hamburg)
  
Foundation:

  Max Oertz, a builder of high-quality sailing yachts, began designing aircraft in 1909. Later he took over the contract manufacturing of some Wright biplanes for the Berlin company, which in return provided the distribution of the monoplane designed by Oertz.
  Max Oertz designed his first powered aircraft as early as 1909, and the first closed aerodynamic fuselage in 1911. Max Oertz designed several flying boats for the Navy and maintained his own airfield in Schneverdingen for test flights. Most of the known aircraft were flying boats, of which the Oertz W6 Flugschoner was particularly striking, a tandem biplane with an additional conventional tailplane and double rudder. The two Maybach engines were housed in the elegant boat hull and drove the propellers via long-distance shafts. Prince Heinrich of Prussia supported him, and the Reichs-Marine-Amt (RMA) also took over some flying boats.
  But around 1917, the company was incorporated into the “Hansa-Brandenburg” company.


Aircraft Development:

  Max Oertz’ designs also included aircraft and self-stabilizing captive balloons. For the Zeppelin, Oertz designed a so-called spotting basket, which could be roped down from the military airship sailing above the clouds on a long rope to below the cloud cover for observation purposes.
  From “Flugsport 1979”: Above all, the Oertz Works were not laid out as quantity production works but were used to meet the special requirements of yacht construction by scientific investigation into the smallest mechanical details, and to devote an absolutely loving care to workmanship and finish.
  These fundamental facts, which were reflected in all new productions of this scientifically working factory, whether boats or flying machines, could already be noticed in the very first machine built in 1910. This was a land machine, a monoplane with monocoque body, which weighed only 770 lbs., and, fitted with a 70 hp Gnome engine, reached a speed of 80 m.p.h.
<...>
Prince Heinrich and his wife as guest by Oertz 1910, who was demonstrating his landplane LE with a 70 hp rotary engine.
Max Oertz, Jachtwerft, Neuhof-Reiherstieg (Hamburg)
  
Aircraft Development:

<...>
  This first success encouraged Oertz to return to his proper element, the sea, and to apply the same principles to the construction of a flying boat; this was ordered by the Navy in the spring of 1913. Already in the autumn of the same year this flying boat could show its usefulness by successful test flights at Breitling, near Warnemunde. This machine, which was designated as F.B.1 is shown above, was fitted with a 100 hp Argus engine placed down in the boat and driving the airscrew through shafts and bevel gearing. This arrangement, the constructional details of which had been worked out by Dr. Oertz himself, was something quite new for those times, and this first boat already showed the characteristics of all later Oertz flying boats.
<...>
The Oertz F.B.1 was a pre-war design, being built in 1913. The F.B.1 was clearly a boat hull with flying surfaces.
Max Oertz, Jachtwerft, Neuhof-Reiherstieg (Hamburg)
  
Aircraft Development:

<...>
  It was not long before a demand arose for larger and more powerful boats, and the Oertz Works received an order for a series of flying boats, which were to be fitted with 260 hp Argus engines.
  Delivery of these engines was much delayed, and when they were available, they proved to have exceeded the estimated weight to such an extent that it was quite out of the question to fit them in the Oertz boats. It was, therefore, decided to fit, instead, the 240 h.p. Maybach airship motors HsLu (Mb.IV), which were at that time quite new. This was done, and in the autumn of 1915 the first of these boats could be delivered. Although the boats were really too large for the engines’ power, which was lower than that for which they were designed, and that the engines were heavier than had been the estimated weight of the Argus engines, the boats were able to pass their acceptance tests. One of these boats Oertz W.4 is shown on the next page.
<...>
Oertz F.B.2 (1913)
Oertz F.B.3 (1914)
Oertz W.4 (1914)
Above: Oertz W.4 finally powered by a Mercedes D.lll, after the Maybach Mb.IV engines had been tested as not suitable.
Max Oertz, Jachtwerft, Neuhof-Reiherstieg (Hamburg)
  
Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The Oertz W.5 flying boat specially designed for a the 240 hp Maybach engine. This machine was presented to the Navy by Messrs. Krupp von Bohlen and Halbach. All previous experience was taken advantage of in the design of this boat, and especially was the step question solved successfully.
<...>
Oertz W.5 (1915-1917)
Max Oertz, Jachtwerft, Neuhof-Reiherstieg (Hamburg)
  
Foundation:

  Max Oertz, a builder of high-quality sailing yachts, began designing aircraft in 1909. Later he took over the contract manufacturing of some Wright biplanes for the Berlin company, which in return provided the distribution of the monoplane designed by Oertz.
  Max Oertz designed his first powered aircraft as early as 1909, and the first closed aerodynamic fuselage in 1911. Max Oertz designed several flying boats for the Navy and maintained his own airfield in Schneverdingen for test flights. Most of the known aircraft were flying boats, of which the Oertz W6 Flugschoner was particularly striking, a tandem biplane with an additional conventional tailplane and double rudder. The two Maybach engines were housed in the elegant boat hull and drove the propellers via long-distance shafts. Prince Heinrich of Prussia supported him, and the Reichs-Marine-Amt (RMA) also took over some flying boats.
  But around 1917, the company was incorporated into the “Hansa-Brandenburg” company.


Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The appearance of the large fast American Curtiss flying boats in the War gave the impetus for us also to start construction of large boats to a considerable extent. In connection with the Brandenburg Aircraft Works, the construction of two large flying boats with two 300 hp engines were commenced. The hulls of these boats were already finished when the Armistice came, but the work on the complete boats was then stopped.
One sample only was built of the Oertz W.6 "Schooner", a rare tandem biplane.
Oertz W.8 (1917)
In 1916, the last Oertz W8 flying boat was presented to the Seeflugzeug Versuchskommando SVK (Seaplane Experimental Command) and, after acceptance on September 21, 1916, was given the naval number 1157. This craft was also called "Krupp-Boot".
Manufacturing the first Otto biplane in Speyer's City Hall.
Pfalz personal with its first Pfalz-built Otto biplane (1913).
First Otto B-Type with 150 hp Rapp 1466-Motor.
Pfalz Flugzeug-Werke GmbH

Foundation:

  The company was founded in July 12, 1913 by Mr. Alfred Eversbusch. Since the financial means of one individual were not large enough for such an undertaking, not only the whole Eversbusch family participated. That is, in addition to Alfred Eversbusch, his brother Ernst and his brother-in-law Willy Sabersky-Mussigbrodt, there were three other shareholders: the brothers Richard and Eugen Kahn and August Kahn, who was not directly related to the brothers.
  Pfalz Flugzeugwerke GmbH was thus one of the oldest German aircraft manufacturing companies and during World War I became the third largest manufacturer of fighter aircraft in Germany after Fokker and Albatros.
  Apparently for economic reasons, the company was geared up to build under license. Willy Sabersky-Mussigbrodt, who was the only person with technical training in the field of aircraft, had already joined another company as a designer in 1914. In order to obtain a license contract, Alfred Eversbusch turned to the Albatroswerke in Berlin-Johannisthal. But there they were only interested in granting a license if they could acquire a share in the Pfalz-Flugzeugwerke. Therefore, a contract was signed to establish a new company: Pfalz-Flugzeugwerke Licenz Albatros GmbH. But real activities of this new company never took place. For as early as August 5, 1913, Albatros GmbH applied for cancellation of its registration.
  After some legal wrangling, the cancellation of the application was granted in December 1913 and the company was again registered as Pfalz-Flugzeugwerke GmbH.
  Before the war, it had acquired a license from the French company Morane-Saulnier. During the war, it was given the short name "Pfal" by the Flugzeugmeisterei.


Aircraft Development:

  Initially, an agreement was reached with the Bavarian Otto-Werke to build its types under license. After delivery of the promised type, production of the first licensed aircraft began immediately by the Pfalz-Flugzeugwerke at the Speyer Festhalle. Alongside this, used Otto biplanes were also repaired.
  By the outbreak of war, the company had produced just three Parasols, with three more Otto biplanes under construction for the Royal Bavarian Flying Forces. From August 1914 to the end of 1916, Parasol two-seaters and Morane-Saulnier single-seaters with 80 and 100 hp (known as Pfalz E.I and E.II), the latter later also with 160 hp (Pfalz E IV) Oberursel Gnome engines were built, following French designs. Parasol were without, the Morane already equipped with one or two turnable machine guns.
<...>
  In the case of the Parasol aircraft, the advantage was the relatively short takeoff and landing distance of about 50 m with a payload of 230 kg, and these aircraft could climb to 2,000 m within 16 to 18 minutes. The 60 Parasol aircraft were delivered without exception to the Bavarian Army Administration (Fea lb, Schleifiheim).
<...>
Pfalz E.III (1915/16)
A Pfalz parasol powered by the 100 hp Oberursel U.I engine. Under the Idflieg system this version was designated the Pfalz A.II.
In 1915, engineers at Pfalz-Werke also attempted to develop a B airplane. A 60 hp Clerget 7Y rotary engine was used for this purpose. As things stand, it is unclear why a French engine was used for these tests.
The Pfalz 1915 biplane, now powered by a 9-cylinder, 100 hp Oberursel U.I engine, was probably photographed during evaluation at the Flieger-Ersatz-Abteilung in Schleissheim.The different engine and presentation of the wing crosses indicate this may have been a second version of the airplane.
Pfalz Flugzeug-Werke GmbH

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  By the outbreak of war, the company had produced just three Parasols, with three more Otto biplanes under construction for the Royal Bavarian Flying Forces. From August 1914 to the end of 1916, Parasol two-seaters and Morane-Saulnier single-seaters with 80 and 100 hp (known as Pfalz E.I and E.II), the latter later also with 160 hp (Pfalz E IV) Oberursel Gnome engines were built, following French designs. Parasol were without, the Morane already equipped with one or two turnable machine guns. About 20 Morane monoplanes were built for 100 hp Mercedes standard engines (Pfalz V), but did not reach the front. Another 20 aircraft with 100 hp Gnomes (Pfalz VI) were built as improved Morane monoplanes.
<...>
  The Pfalz E.V and E.VI, having been overtaken by light biplanes, did not make it to the front. However, a total of 300 monoplanes were built.
<...>
No serial number is visible on this unarmed Pfalz E.IV.
Advertisement 1916.
Pfalz Flugzeug-Werke GmbH

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  About 20 Morane monoplanes were built for 100 hp Mercedes standard engines (Pfalz V), but did not reach the front.
<...>
  The Pfalz E.V and E.VI, having been overtaken by light biplanes, did not make it to the front. However, a total of 300 monoplanes were built.
<...>
Pfalz Flugzeug-Werke GmbH

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  From early to mid 1917, Roland D.I, D.II and D.IIa licensed aircraft were built. Subsequently, the company released its own type as the Pfalz D.III, later improved as the D IIIa. The latter was replaced by the Pfalz D.XII from April 1918. The average climb performance of the D.IIIa to 3,000 m, with a 180 kg payload, was only 13 minutes, and to 5,000 m about 28 minutes.
<...>
Pfalz D.III (1917)
Pfalz single-seater experimental type with in-line engine (for planned, but unfinished D.XIII).
Aircraft graveyard at Pfalz Flugzeugwerke in 1919. The Pfal D.IV prototype (left on ground) was destroyed as well as the DFW C.V (832/17).
The fuselage of the Pfalz D.IV rests in a pile of airplane parts. The D.IV was a D.III fitted with an experimental 195 hp Benz Bz.IIIb V-8 engine. Unfortunately, the engine was not ready for production and test results were disappointing.
Pfalz Flugzeug-Werke GmbH

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Another type with a Sh III engine (Pfalz D.VIII) went into production in 1918, and the following type (Pfalz D.XIV) arrived as early as the summer of 1918.
<...>
Pfalz D.VIII (1917/18)
Pfalz Flugzeug-Werke GmbH

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  A Pfalz triplane with S.Ill engine also showed good flight performance, but proved too slow, resulting in only 10 aircraft being built.
<...>
Pfalz Dreidecker Dr.I mit Siemens&Halske Sh.III. Further triplanes were the Dr.II with 110 hp Oberursel Ur.II and the Pfalz Dr.IIa with Siemens&Halske Sh.I.
Pfalz D.XII (1918)
Pfalz Flugzeug-Werke GmbH

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Another type with a Sh III engine (Pfalz D.VIII) went into production in 1918, and the following type (Pfalz D.XIV) arrived as early as the summer of 1918.
<...>
Pfalz Flugzeug-Werke GmbH

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The last development, the Pfalz D.XV (Pfalz D.XIV with low-set wings), was built only in small numbers as a result of the end of the war (40 pieces?). The exact number could not be determined.
The Pfalz D.XVf was a derivative of the D.XV equipped with a 185 hp BMW IIIa engine. The aircraft participated in the third fighter competition in Adlershof (D 8364/17).
Flugmaschine REX GmbH, Koln

Foundation:

  On 1 December 1914, the Cologne businessman Walter Gutbier founded the company "Flugmaschine REX GmbH" in Cologne-Ossendorf at Antwerpener Str.18 - 22. The purpose of the company was to build single- and biplane aircraft and to maintain a flying school.
  Co-owner was the Swiss Dr.-Ing. Friedrich Hansen from Aachen. He had already designed aircraft and rotary engines in Zurich in 1909, including the engine for the Rex D.17 aircraft.


Aircraft Development:

  The following types of aircraft were built in Ossendorf:
  The 1915 experimental aircraft was a single-seater with a five-cylinder radial engine from the Rheinische Aerowerke. The special feature was the lower wing that ran freely under the fuselage.
<...>
Flugmaschine REX GmbH, Koln

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1916 the Rex D.6 Jagdeinsitzer was built as a biplane with parallel stems and 80 hp Oberursel. Only one example was built.
<...>
Flugmaschine REX GmbH, Koln

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The following year the Rex D.17 was introduced. It was a clean design inspired by the Nieuport with single-spar lower wing. It was powered by a 100 hp rotary that was cleanly cowled and fitted with a spinner. The small lower wing could also be adjusted as aileron and airbrake. Only one of these was built and, like the others, it did not find favour with the army administration.
Rumpler-Werke A.G. in Berlin-Johannisthal (Ru)

  In 1908, a small office and workshop were set up in Berlin on Gitschiner Strasse, where design parts for automobiles and aircraft were built; it was later moved to Reinickendorfer Strasse. In this office, among other things, the basic principles for the aircraft engine Aeolus were developed.
  Rumpler-Werke is the oldest aircraft factory in Germany after Euler-Werke. The first German aircraft factory had been founded a month earlier in October 1908 by August Euler in Frankfurt am Main.
  On November 24,1908, the "B.Z. am Mittag" published the following announcement:
  "Engineer Edmund Rumpler, Berlin SW, Gitschiner Strasse 5, has incorporated an aircraft construction institute (Luftfahrzeugbauanstalt) into his technical office. The company does not intend to manufacture specific types of aircraft, but rather to implement promising ideas in an appropriate manner at moderate prices. Small aircraft models are also to be manufactured there." Thus the company "Edmund Rumpler, Luftfahrzeugbau" was born. At first it was only a small department, which was attached to the already existing engineering office.
  Thus, in the founding period of the company, the main focus was initially on the advisory and expert evaluation of the countless existing ideas and conceptions in aircraft construction. The business idea led quite quickly to success. Engineer Rumpler, who had previously worked in automotive engineering at Daimler and Adler, where he designed the Adler engine and the Adler motor car, quickly made a respected name for himself.
  In 1909, particularly as a result of the heavy workload in the aircraft department, E. Rumpler saw fit to transform the company into a "Rumpler-Luftfahrzeugbau GmbH" with 90,000 Marks in capital and at the same time to move the factory to Lichtenberg. Gradually, the capital was increased to 700,000 Marks.
  In 1910, Rumpler rented a hangar in Johannisthal on the northern border of the airfield to have the opportunity to test flying machines on the airfield.
  In July 1915, Rumpler-Werke was renamed "Rumpler-Werke GmbH". After the GmbH was dissolved in September 1917 and registered as "E. Rumpler Luftfahrzeugbau in Liqu.", Rumpler-Werke transformed into a stock corporation (equity capital: 3.5 million Marks) as of January 1, 1918.


Aircraft Development:

  The origin of the Rumpler-Taube, whose construction period fell between October 1910 and December 1912, can be traced back to the research work of the Hamburg professor Ahlborn. Ahlborn pointed out to Rumpler that the Austrians Weis, Hiner and Etrich were already working on an aircraft project whose wings were being manufactured on the basis of his information concerning the stabilizing properties of the Zanonia seed. Shortly after, Rumpler-Werke signed a license agreement with Etrich. Shortly thereafter, however, it became apparent that, despite the correct basic principle, improvements were needed in many areas. As a result, various "Tauben" were built, powered by 50-70 and 100 hp Gnome, 70, 100 and 120 hp Argus, 70 and 120 hp Austro-Daimler, 70 and 100 hp Daimler-Mercedes, 80 hp Hiero (Werner and Pfleiderer), 70 hp Dixi (Fahrzeugwerk Eisenach), 50 hp Antoinette, 95 hp NAG as well as 70 hp Daimler with hanging cylinders and 50 hp V8 Rumpler-Aeolus engine.
  Although the company began building seaplanes in 1911, it was not until 1913 that it built the seaplane station at Muggelsee in Berlin-Kopenick.
  The outstanding personality from an aviation point of view in the 2nd decade of the 20th century was Rumpler's chief pilot Hellmuth Hirth.
  With Hirth at the top, Rumplers flight school progressed and became one of the most successful institutions in flight training. Hirth achieved lasting fame by flying from Munich to Berlin in June 1911 on a Rumpler-Taube. In 1912, Hirth was the star of almost every large flight competition and with that became the most successful and renowned aviator from Johannisthal. He changed employers in early 1913 and then became the chief technology officer of the Albatros-Works, also at Johannisthal.
<...>
Rumpler Taube with two Argus motors driving two propellers. (1914)
Rumpler Wasser-Eindecker 3F (1913)
Training of pilots at the Melli Beese Flight School. This Taube is powered by a 4-cylinder 100 hp Argus As I
Rumpler-Taube 3C (1913)
Rumpler Sea biplane 4B2 (1913/14)
Rumpler Sea biplane 4B11 (1914)
Rumpler-Werke A.G. in Berlin-Johannisthal (Ru)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1913 a new monoplane was created, which showed almost the same stability as the Taube, but was considerably faster and more capable of climbing than it. The climb of this machine with 500 kilograms of payload was 3000 meters in 25 minutes, the speed 154 kilometers per hour.
<...>
На основе "Таубе" был создан расчалочный моноплан Румплер 4С.
The Rumpler Taube 4C was the final Rumpler Taube design. For improved maneuverability it had conventional hinged ailerons and elevators; these were much easier for the pilot to operate. (The Peter M. Bowers Collection/ The Museum of Flight)
Rumpler-Werke A.G. in Berlin-Johannisthal (Ru)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  At the beginning of the war, the company developed a two-seat multi-purpose biplane of mixed construction with a wooden basis for the fuselage from the Rumpler Taube monoplane and a Mercedes D.I engine (100 hp). The aircraft with the manufacturer's designation Rumpler 4A turned out to be very successful. It was adopted by the German Air Force under the code B.I and put into mass production at Rumpler and Pfalz. Totally 198 machines were built. It was used in 1914-1915 on the Western and Eastern fronts.
<...>
Rumpler B.I (Rumpler 4A) (1914)
The Rumpler biplane on which Herr Basser beat the world's duration record at Johannisthal on June 24th last, with a flight of 18 hrs. 12 mins. duration. The nose of the fuselage round the 100 hjp. Mercedes engine is covered with aluminium, whilst the top of the body is covered with three-ply wood. The rear portion of the fuselage is totally covered in with fabric. Provision has been made for quick erecting and dismantling of the wings, which are separated by 12 steel tube struts of streamline section. The chassis is exactly similar to that of the Rumpler monoplanes, thus allowing of interchange of spare parts.
Rumpler-Werke A.G. in Berlin-Johannisthal (Ru)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The next type produced by Rumpler-Werke was a biplane, which, with further improvements, became known under the military designation Ru C.I. The first biplane of this type was the Ru C.I., which was the first of its kind in the world. Based on this type, further C-airplanes were subsequently developed by the company.
<...>
Rumpler C.I (5A2) (1915)
Rumpler-Werke A.G. in Berlin-Johannisthal (Ru)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  At the beginning of 1915 Rumpler built G-type aircraft with 2 wing-mounted engines. In May of the same year a new monoplane was built, similar in stability to the Taube, but considerably faster and more capable of climbing.
<...>
Rumpler test pilot Gustav Basser at left in front of the Rumpler 6A2 at Johannisthal. Although not a successful design, the 6A2 was instrumental in development of the larger, two-bay 6A5 that became the Rumpler C.III and lead to the Rumpler C.IV. The 6A2 introduced the basic fuselage and tail assembly and even the wing planform that are seen in the later and larger, more powerful two-bay Rumpler C.III reconnaissance airplane.
Rumpler-Werke A.G. in Berlin-Johannisthal (Ru)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The last seaplane developed during the war was the 6B1/2 single-seater naval combat aircraft. This aircraft was developed in response to the Navy's request for a singleseat aircraft with the same good flight characteristics as the Ru C.I. By dispensing with the observer's seat and all its installations, so much weight was saved that the addition of the floats and its frame did not lead to an increase in takeoff mass. As a result of the low wing loading of the aircraft, it took off easily. Climbability was remarkably good. The upper wing deck was staggered forward, while the rear tail surfaces remained the same as on the Ru C.I.
Rumpler C.V (1916-18)
Rumpler C.IV (6A7) (1916)
Rumpler C.IV(Mb) (6A7). Later production R.IV aircraft omitted the spinner, which improved speed. (1916)
Rumpler-Werke A.G. in Berlin-Johannisthal (Ru)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Particularly appreciated at the front were the long-range reconnaissance aircraft of Rumpler-Werke (Rubild). These aircraft could quickly gain 6000 to 7000 meters in altitude and effectively enable reconnaissance of the war zone.
<...>
Rumpler C.VI Rubild (1917)
Rumpler C.VII (1917)
Rumpler C.VII Rubild Mb (1917)
Rumpler-Werke A.G. in Berlin-Johannisthal (Ru)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1918, the company released a promising fighter aircraft, but too late. The development history was as follows:
   7D1 - single-seat fighter prototype (based on 7C1) with 160 hp Mercedes D.III, 3 samples built in spring 1917.
   7D2 - same as 7D1, not successful tested.
   7D3 - revised 7D2 with conventional center section, no progress.
   7D4 - flight tested in October 1917, two different variants (J- and parallel struts).
   7D5 - Tests with new surface radiator between the upper wings.
   7D7 - final D.I configuration with 170 hp Mercedes D.IIIa engine. Not accepted by Idflieg due to twisting behavior.
   8D1 - final production configuration of Rumpler D.I.
<...>
The third variant was presented as Ru 7D3 in December 1918 at the Breslau Industrial Fair.
Seen being exhibited at Breslau in December 1918, the Rumpler 7D 3 flew in the summer of 1917.
A fifth variant of the Rumpler D.I development was the Ru 7D5 with airfoil radiator.
The last Ru "7D" was this 7D8 with ear radiators above the lower wings (it had the old rudder design).
Rumpler D.I with BMW IIIa engine (1917)
This Ru 8D1 was in the final production configuration of the Ru D.I with new rudder design. The Rumpler D.I had excellent performance, but Rumpler was never able to bring it to full production status due to its complex, lightweight structure that was not robust enough for a fighter subjected to high stresses in combat.
Sablatnig-Flugzeugbau-Gesellschaft m.b.H., Berlin (Sab)

Foundation:

  Josef Sablatnig initially studied mechanical engineering at the Technical University in Graz and electrical engineering at the Technical University in Brno. When the technophile Sablatnig heard about the successful flights of the Wright brothers, he left Europe and went to the USA for some time to study with the Wrights. Before returning to Germany in 1910, Sablatnig bought a Wright airplane that same year. In 1911, he became a naturalized Prussian citizen. In the same year he took up employment with Louis Bleriot and then in Wiener Neustadt with the Autoplan company, where Sablatnig met the Munich engineer Karl Bomhard.
  In May of the same year, Bomhard applied for a patent on a biplane with sweep and V-shape. He was also involved in the development of a monoplane called "Monobiplan". However, he lacked any flying experience. In 1911/12, he had a biplane built at Goetze-Flugzeugwerke. A second biplane was commissioned from Lohner, which was based on the proven model of the Lohner-Pfeil biplane. This Lohner-Bomhard biplane achieved remarkable feats in 1912 - an altitude of 850 meters.
  1912 was also the year in which Bomhard returned to Germany and met Josef Sablatnig. The latter further developed the "Bomhard arrow biplane", which was built by the Berlin coachbuilding company Kuhlstein.
  Sablatnig was a founding member of Union-Flugzeugwerke in 1913, where the first Bomhard biplanes were also mass-produced.
  During the First World War, he was involved in building up the naval air force as a war volunteer in Kiel. On October 5, 1915, Dr. Josef Sablatnig and the banker Josef Mollinger founded their own aircraft design company, the "Sablatnig-Flugzeugbau GmbH", which, among other things, designed and built the types Sablatnig SF 2, SF 5 and SF 6 in small series from 1916 onwards in the premises acquired from the Goetze Flugzeugwerke. Since the small company was overwhelmed by production orders, it was supported in this by Luftfahrzeug-Gesellschaft mbH (LFG, Roland).
  The military abbreviation was "Sab".


Aircraft Development:

  During World War I, as a war volunteer under Prince Heinrich of Prussia in Kiel, he was involved in building up the German naval air force. The first naval aircraft designed by Sablatnig, SF 1, registration 490, was built in Berlin in the workshop of the boat builder Rethel. The necessary steel parts were supplied by the Gotze company. Sablatnig presented this aircraft to the Navy administration in the summer of 1915 and hoped for a positive evaluation, since the performances presented certainly gave cause for acceptance of this aircraft as a new naval aviator type.
  Sablatnig, without having already opened his own aircraft manufacturing company, received an order to build 16 aircraft, a significant number for the Navy at that time. In the absence of his own workshops, Sablatnig agreed with Dr. Gotze to have the naval reconnaissance planes built under the designation SF 2, in the latter's aircraft works. The aircraft were delivered in the summer of 1916.
  When the Reichs-Marine-Amt held out the prospect of a follow-up order for 30 to 40 aircraft, Dr. Sablatnig and banker Moiling set up Sablatnig-Flugzeugbau-Gesellschaft mbH, Berlin, at the beginning of October 1916 by purchasing Department III of the Gotze Company at Schlesische Str. 26.
  Subsequently, they created the Sablatnig SF 2, SF 5, SF 6, and SF 8 types, which were built in small series. Greater success was achieved with the SF 5, a direct development of the SF 2, of which 101 aircraft were delivered. However, since the small company was overwhelmed by production orders, it was supported by Luftfahrzeug-Gesellschaft mbH (LFG) and Luft-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft (LVG) by acting as licensees. Sablatnig built the FF 49c under license for Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen.
  In 1917, construction of landplanes began after an SF5 was fitted with a wheeled landing gear instead of floats for experimental purposes and successfully tested.
Sablatnig SF.5 (1917)
Sablatnig SF.6 (Sab B.I) (1917)
Sablatnig Sab N.I (Bz stands for Benz) (1917)
The experimental Sablatnig C.II Two-seater Tractor Biplane C II. (240 h.p. Maybach Mb IV engine.)
This Sab P.I was modified by installing a passenger cabin. The pilot was still sitting in an open cockpit.
Sablatnig SF.3 (1916)
Sablatnig C.III (1918)
Postwar production of a Sab P.III passenger aeroplane.
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

  Johann Schutte (1873-1940). Mr. Geh. Kommerzienrat von Rochling and the well-known agricultural machinery builder Karl Lanz and his wife founded the company Schfitte-Lanz-Luftfahrzeugbau GmbH in Mannheim on June 1,1909 and built the Schutte-Lanz airship for World War I starting in 1911. As the second largest airship manufacturer, the company was Graf Zeppelin's main competitor. Schutte's rigid airship differed from the Zeppelin type in its wooden frame. On October 17, 1911 the first test flight of the airship SL I started in Rheinau.
  At the beginning of the last year of the war in 1918, the company was transformed into a general partnership under the name "Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz oHG".
  During the war, it had a second factory built in Zeesen for fear of air raids. Construction of this factory began on October 1, 1915.


Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Mannheim-Rheinau (Schul)

  Initially, the aircraft company did not have its own factory premises in Mannheim. It was affiliated with the parent company "Heinrich Lanz, Mannheim", which had a total site of around 842,000 m2 and an airfield of just under 650,000 m2.
  The airship company was located in the middle of the Rhine plain, in the southeast of the city of Mannheim, 9 km from Mannheim's main train station, near the Mannheim-Karlsruhe railroad line. A branch fine Rheinau-Ketsch branched off from the Rheinau station of this railroad fine, which could also be reached from Mannheim by electric streetcar in about 30 minutes, and its first station, "Luftschiffwerft", was located on the factory premises.
  The company was originally engaged in the construction of Schutte-Lanz type airships and later moved on to supplying aircraft spare parts specifically for DFW and AGO as well as repairing aircraft. New aircraft construction, especially in Zeesen, was not started until 1917. From the beginning of 1918, the Mannheim plant supplied apparatus for engine installations and bombing.


Aircraft development:

  The Mannheim plant did not carry out its own aeronautical development, as all development work was transferred to the Zeesen plant. As mentioned, in Mannheim-Rheinau, they were busy with the production of spare parts for airplanes and occasional repairs of airplanes. The Schutte-Lanz factory, manufactured:
   18 airships;
   1 experimental aircraft, C-Typ;
   2.300 valves for balloons;
   9,000 sets of radiator valves for aircraft.
  Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz in Mannheim-Rheinau repaired: 5.271 aircraft and 113 engines.
The Schul C.I two-seater had a futuristic look due to the radiators mounted in front of the nacelle.
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  After the initial disaster with the crashed G-airplane, the decision was made not to develop and manufacture their own aircraft types, but to seek license production of B- and C-airplanes. This gave the shipyard the opportunity to devote itself gradually and with less risk to the special features of aircraft construction.
  The Schul D.I was built in 1915 as a replica of the successful British Sopwith Tabloid as the first German fighter biplane, but it was underestimated as a fighter and rejected, as the monoplane was considered more suitable as a fighter due to its better visibility for the pilot. Its planned further development into the D.II with a more powerful 100 hp Mercedes inline engine was therefore cancelled.
<...>
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

  Johann Schutte (1873-1940). Mr. Geh. Kommerzienrat von Rochling and the well-known agricultural machinery builder Karl Lanz and his wife founded the company Schfitte-Lanz-Luftfahrzeugbau GmbH in Mannheim on June 1,1909 and built the Schutte-Lanz airship for World War I starting in 1911. As the second largest airship manufacturer, the company was Graf Zeppelin's main competitor. Schutte's rigid airship differed from the Zeppelin type in its wooden frame. On October 17, 1911 the first test flight of the airship SL I started in Rheinau.
  At the beginning of the last year of the war in 1918, the company was transformed into a general partnership under the name "Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz oHG".
  During the war, it had a second factory built in Zeesen for fear of air raids. Construction of this factory began on October 1, 1915.


Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Werk Zeesen/Konigs Wusterhausen i. Mark

Aircraft Development:

  Shortly before the war, Schutte-Lanz had already been engaged in the construction of airplanes. In the course of 1915, the G airplane with two engines arranged on the wings was completed. During a test flight, however, this prototype suffered a total loss. Since at that time the military authorities still gave priority to the airship, they showed no interest in such a large aircraft. As a result, further developments were initially discontinued. In the meantime, work began on October 1, 1915 on the construction of a new shipyard in Zeesen near Konigs Wusterhausen. Construction of the first airship manufactured in Zeesen could begin here as early as the early summer of 1916. In order to achieve an effective utilization of the shipyard, the board of Schutte-Lanz AG decided to locate the experimental aircraft construction in Zeesen as well. Thus, in addition to the airship hangar, various workshops for aircraft construction were built at the shipyard.
<...>
An early (1914-15) Schutte-Lanz Experimental Type G.I Twin-engined Biplane, possessing many features betraying its relationship lighter-than-air craft. Two 160 h.p. Mercedes D.III engine.
Schutte-Lanz G.I.
The heavy, drag-creating propeller extension shafts and their supports, clearly seen in this view, were the result of deciding to use a pusher configuration and did nothing to enhance performance or load-carrying capability.
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1916/17, the D.III and the D.IV followed in parallel.
  The D.III was a well-designed fighter biplane with wings of different vertical depths connected by V-braces, similar to the Nieuport 11, and a Mercedes D.III in-line engine fully enclosed to improve aerodynamics, which enabled the aircraft to fly at high speeds. Nevertheless, the flight characteristics were not convincing and no production took place.
<...>
The Schutte-Lanz company primarily built airships, but then expanded into designing airplanes, none of which reached production.The Schutte-Lanz D.III fighter prototype was powered by the 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine. A neat, conventional design, when flown by von Arnim on 25 January it climbed to 1,000m in 3 minutes and 5,000m in 31.9 minutes, an unimpressive performance. Loaded weight was 1,980 pounds.
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1916/17, the D.III and the D.IV followed in parallel.
  The Schul D.IV with a 220 hp Benz Bz.III engine performed even worse; only two prototypes were produced.
<...>
  The D. VII was a return to the D.III concept. Three prototypes were built, which were still being tested at the end of the war.
<...>
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The planned further development into the D.V was abandoned because the over-compressed Mercedes D.IIIa was not available. However, the prototype of a triplane, the Dr.I, was also built from the Schul D.III on an experimental basis.
<...>
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The D.VI, developed in 1917 with a 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine, was a hybrid between a high-wing monoplane and a monoplane, its upper wing supported by wide, wing-like struts. A prototype was built in 1918, but it was put on a wing during its maiden flight on May 29, 1918, and was almost totally damaged.
<...>
The Schutte-Lanz D.VI, powered by a 160 hp Mercedes D.III, was a parasol monoplane with supplementary airfoils on the bracing struts. Development was halted after it crashed 29 May 1918. This appears to be the only photograph of the type that has survived.
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The largest aircraft developed by Schutte-Lanz was the twin-fuselage giant aircraft Schul. R.I with six Basse & Selve engines of 280 hp each. This long-range bomber had a takeoff mass of 16,600 kg, while it could carry close to 6 tons of payload (including fuel). The top speed was given as 150 km/h.
<...>
Schutte-Lanz R.I unbuilt project. (1918)
Otto Schwade & Co., Erfurt

Foundation:

  The engineer Otto Schwade, born on September 25, 1857, founded a company for technical products and pumps in Erfurt in 1888. By exploiting a patent of his colleague Dr. Scholz, Otto Schwade gained a large market share from 1910 onwards with the production of a flywheel-less duplex cylinder pump without external control (duplex pumps are double cylinder pumps), which was used in particular in mines and on ships. When Otto Schwade died in 1911, the company was taken over by his son Hans-James Schwade, keeping the original name.
  In 1910, while Otto Schwade was still alive, an aircraft department was established at the plant and the company's own personnel were sent to France to study aircraft construction there. This also included training at well-known engine manufacturers such as the Societe des Moteurs Gnome of the Seguin brothers.
  The new business fields were now also reflected in the name of the company, which from 1910 was given the addition: "Aeroplan- und Motorenbau". In addition to a number of aircraft, the company mainly manufactured its own "Stahlherz" aircraft engines until the outbreak of war. The company continued to develop its own engines until 1916.


Aircraft Development:

  The aircraft developed by Otto Schwade himself between 1911 and 1916 were not used in the German armed forces.
  However, the development work on compressors for increasing the power of aircraft engines at high altitudes is worth mentioning.
  Otto Schwade had the best prerequisites due to his rich experience in pump construction, because a supercharger for aircraft engines is basically nothing other than an air pump.
1913: biplane with lattice fuselage, covered pilot seats, 80 hp Stahlherz engine.
1913: Eight by Schwade under license built Aviatik P.20 aircraft. These aircraft were exclusively used in Schwade's flight school.
1914: Single-seat biplane with disguised nose in teardrop shape, 80 hp Stalherz engine.
The Schwade 1914 single-seat pusher fighter prototype. (Peter M. Grosz collection, STDB)
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Foundation and Start of Aircraft Production:

  Before the war, Siemens-Schuckert-Werke (SSW) manufactured mainly electrical machines and electrical equipment at several locations in Germany. In the course of the war, it also engaged in aviation.
  Siemens-Schuckert-Werke had begun building a semi-rigid airship in 1907 when the commander of the Prussian Airship Battalion, Major Groll, presented it with a design he had worked out together with Chief Engineer Basenach and Captain Sperling. This military airship had a gas capacity of 1800 m3, was 40 m long, and had a 25 hp engine. After several successful voyages in the winter of 1908/9, the larger airship M I with a gas capacity of 5,000 m3 followed. SSW then started to build its own airship, designed by Dr. Kreil and Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Dietzius. With a gas capacity of 13,000 m3 and a length of 118 m, it was the largest semi-rigid airship and was powered by 4 x 125 hp Daimler engines. The first voyage took place on January 23, 1911, and it was later stationed in the newly built revolving hangar in Biesdorf, east of Berlin. A total of 72 trips were made, and while the airship proved to be quite fast, its dimensions proved too large for an impact airship. Airship construction was subsequently abandoned at SSW.
  Parallel to these airship tests, aircraft construction was also carried out from 1909 onwards, under the direction of Mr. Burkhardt, who with a further 2 occupants undertook tests with a biplane manufactured by SSW, but crashed with this aircraft in 1911, with the flying machine suffering a total loss.
  The Siemens-Schuckert-Werke in Nuremberg, a branch of the Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Siemensstadt, started aircraft construction in January 1916 and incorporated it into the transformer plant.


Aircraft Development:

Siemensstadt:

  The practical implementation of aircraft construction began in 1909 in a small workshop on the Bornstedter Feld near Potsdam, where engineer Burkhardt designed a biplane.
<...>
The first SSW biplane performed its maiden flight in March 1910.
The first SSW monoplane was powered by an 4-cyl 50 hp Argus pusher engine above the wings (1911).
The radiator on this Ssw monoplane with tractor propeller (50 hp Argus) directly in front of the pilot prevented any forward visibility. The sight gaps between the fuselage and the wing allowed sufficient ground visibility during landing.
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Siemensstadt:

<...>
  The first experimental aircraft were soon released, these were two monoplanes of the "Bulldogg" type, one of which was equipped with 100 hp Mercedes, the other with 100 hp Siemens-Halske. The death of Alfred Pietschker, a grandson of Wernervon Siemens, gave the final boost to the discontinuation of aircraft construction. Since both aircraft did not meet Forssman's expectations, the project was discontinued.
<...>
Front quarter view of the 100 hp Mercedes D.I-powered "Bulldog" built by SSW to Forssman's prewar design. Seating was two crewmen side-by-side. No armament was fitted. The radiators are fitted between the wing-roots and the wheels.
Two SSW aircraft "Bulldog" existed: equipped with Daimler D.I (100 hp) (shown) or with Siemens-Halske Sh.I (100 hp).
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Transformatorenwerk Nuremberg

<...>
  Due to the fact that these monoplanes were replaced by biplanes at the front and a repeat order was not planned, the construction of a new biplane "D.5” was started in June 1916 as a type aircraft for a new series. However, no delivery contract was signed.
<...>
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Transformatorenwerk Nuremberg

<...>
  The start of aircraft construction at the Nuremberg branch plant developed hand in hand with the main plant in Siemensstadt. The first delivery order consisted of 25 monoplanes with permanently installed machine guns. 19 aircraft were equipped with Siemens rotary engines, the rest received rotary engines from Oberursel. Initially, production proceeded in very slow steps, since on the one hand there was too little manpower, and on the other hand delivery of the aircraft was delayed, since on the one hand the MGs were missing and on the other hand the rotary engines were delivered late.
  Due to the fact that these monoplanes were replaced by biplanes at the front and a repeat order was not planned, the construction of a new biplane "D.5” was started in June 1916 as a type aircraft for a new series. However, no delivery contract was signed.
<...>
Engine installation on a SSW E.I fighter.
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Siemensstadt:

<...>
  After the outbreak of World War I, the aircraft designers Villehad Forssmann and the Steffen brothers from Neumunster offered their experience and plans to the SSW. Since the army administration also suggested a resumption of aircraft construction, an aircraft department was set up at the Siemens-Schuckert dynamo plan under the direction of Prof. Reichel. Forssmann immediately began designing a four-engine R airplane, while Franz Steffen went to work on an R airplane with a central engine system, in which the Idflieg was very interested.
  Forssmann left at the beginning of 1916, after engineer Harald Wolff had previously taken over as head of the design office.
  Under the leadership of Professor Reichel, Forssman began designing a four-engine R airplane as early as the end of 1914, while Franz Steffen turned his attention to an R airplane with a central engine arrangement and a split fuselage. After various modifications, both aircraft were accepted by the Army Administration. The design developed by Franz Steffen was used for series production.
<...>
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Siemensstadt:

<...>
  After the outbreak of World War I, the aircraft designers Villehad Forssmann and the Steffen brothers from Neumunster offered their experience and plans to the SSW. Since the army administration also suggested a resumption of aircraft construction, an aircraft department was set up at the Siemens-Schuckert dynamo plan under the direction of Prof. Reichel. Forssmann immediately began designing a four-engine R airplane, while Franz Steffen went to work on an R airplane with a central engine system, in which the Idflieg was very interested.
  Forssmann left at the beginning of 1916, after engineer Harald Wolff had previously taken over as head of the design office.
  Under the leadership of Professor Reichel, Forssman began designing a four-engine R airplane as early as the end of 1914, while Franz Steffen turned his attention to an R airplane with a central engine arrangement and a split fuselage. After various modifications, both aircraft were accepted by the Army Administration. The design developed by Franz Steffen was used for series production.
<...>
SSW R.I, originally designated as G.31/15, than G.32/15, was powered by three 150 hp Benz Bz.III engines. Two engines were located side by side in the forward fuselage. The third engine was located behind it and a little lower. All three engines used a central gearbox to drive the two propellers.
The SSW R.II 2/15 under construction at the SSW Dynamowerk.
The only Siemens Schuckert-Werken R VI, 6/15, was delivered to the giant bomber operating Rf Abt 501, flying out of Vilna on the Eastern Front in late 1916. Powered by three 222hp Benz Bz IVs burried in the fuselage, these drove two oppositely rotating propellers via a complex web of right-angled power take-offs and transmission drives. A key characteristic of this six-man machine was that its twin boom fuselage was arranged with the booms one on top of the other, rather than being set out side by side in the normal fashion. The top level speed of the R VI was 80.8mph, while its optimum range was 323 miles.
The SSW R.VI 6/15 on its way to join Rfa 501 at Vilna in August 1916.
SSW VII (R7/15) (1916)
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Siemensstadt:

<...>
  Siemens-Schuckert-Werke achieved its first major successes with the development of a single-seater based on the Nieuport model - the SSW D.I with a 110 hp Siemens- Halske Sh.I rotary engine. This type was accepted by Idflieg in August 1916 and an order was placed for the delivery of 150 + 250 aircraft, of which, however, only 95 were realized, as the Army administration wanted the development of an aircraft with improved performance using a 160 hp Siemens- Halske engine (Sh.III).
<...>


Transformatorenwerk Nuremberg

<...>
  In October 1916, an order for the production of 6 Nieuport-type "D.I" biplanes was placed on a test basis by the Inspectorate of Aviation Troops (Idflieg), and the monthly output was increased somewhat. Towards the end of 1916, another order was placed, initially for the accelerated completion of 150 units with Siemens rotary engines. Parallel to this, as already mentioned, the factory premises were expanded by May 1917.
  In the meantime, the series production of the D airplanes, which had been developed in the rooms of the transformer plant during the months of January to the end of April 1917 and which amounted to 15 units per month, and which was brought to the required level of 50 airplanes per month in June, had to be aborted suddenly, since the type had been classified as obsolete in the meantime. The biplane, now in series production, met the same fate. The existing contract for the delivery of 100 aircraft and the current order were cancelled, so that only the parts already manufactured could be accepted.
  As compensation for the cancelled contracts, Idflieg offered Siemens-Schuckert Werke in Nuremberg to turn its attention to aircraft repair. The monthly output was set at 30 to 40 B- or C-type Albatros or LVG aircraft. Although an average of 25 repair orders were still received at the plant between June and July 1917, it soon became apparent that the existing workshop capacity was underutilized. In September, only 18 repair aircraft were delivered, and in October through December 1917, an average of only 5 to 6 aircraft were delivered. For this reason, Idflieg, in order to again keep the plant fully occupied, placed a new series order on Alb C.IIIs and additionally contracted the company to repair SSW aircraft built at the parent company.
  Although the Transformatorenwerk was able to absorb a large part of the workforce of the aircraft construction department as a result of the constantly changing order situation, it could not be avoided that a large part of the employees of the aircraft construction department had to be furloughed or laid off for several weeks.
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Siemensstadt:

<...>
  On the basis of these experimental experiences and detailed scientific calculations, the aircraft SSW D.III and SSW D.IV were then developed. These aircraft, as well as the Gotha G.IV license, were then mass produced.
  The parallel development of D aircraft led to the success of the SSW D.III with 160 hp Siemens-Halske engine (Sh. Ill) in September 1917, which was followed by an initial order for 20 aircraft at the end of 1917. This type, developed from the SSW D.I, featured an improved design as well as climbability and maneuverability.
  In addition to the D.I and R.I aircraft mentioned above, other types were developed and some were delivered to the front in smaller series. These were B-, D-, E-airplanes from own development as well as licensed Alb C.IIIc and Go G.IV equipped with Daimler, Maybach, Argus or NAG engines.
<...>
SSW D.III 8341/17, the second production D.III fighter with 4-bladed "Wotan" propeller installed, is shown at the SSW factory at Siemensstadt. Normally fitted with a spinner, the photo shows it without its spinner.
Siemens-Schuckert SSW D.III with 4-blade "Wotan" propeller.
Siemens-Schuckert D.III fighter single-seater with 4-blade propeller. View into two MG barrels. SSW received an order for 80 aircraft of this type.
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Siemensstadt:

<...>
  This was followed by the construction of a large number of experimental aircraft, including a triplane with a 110 hp Sh.Ia engine and another with two such engines (Dr.I and Dr.II and DDr.I and DDr.II).
<...>
Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Abt. Flugzeugbau, Siemensstadt b. Berlin (SSW)

Aircraft Development:

Siemensstadt:

<...>
  In the last year of the war, SSW intended to complete a 6-engine R-plane. However, this project could not be realized before the end of the war, as well as the plan for an 8-engine bomber (SSW R.IX).
<...>
SSW R.VIII (R23/16) with Helix wooden propeller, its drive and bearing, Junkers nozzle radiator. The pusher propeller had four blades, the tractor propeller only two. Only one of two aircraft was completed. At the time of its completion the Siemens-Schuckert R.VIII was the largest aeroplane in the world.
Union Flugzeugwerke, Berlin-Teltow (Mark)

  By the end of 1912 Karl Bomhard and Josef Sablatnig formed the Union-Flugzeugwerke GmbH in Berlin-Teltow. The two were joined by Georg Konig as aircraft designer. Up to 1916 the Union Flugzeugwerke designed and produced aircraft, but lack of orders led to the take-over of the company by the Norddeutsche Flugzeugwerke. The aircraft all had a characteristic wing in the shape of an arrow. This design proved to be insufficient and was later abandoned. In 1915 J. Sablatnig constructed his first seaplane and in 1916 he formed the Sablatnig-Flugzeugbau GmbH in Berlin.
  Josef Sablatnig studied mechanical and electrical engineering in Graz and Brno. In 1909 he trained as a pilot with the company Flugmaschine Wright GmbH in Johannisthal. Sablatnig, who may also be considered the world's first night pilot, set several high-altitude flight records at Johannisthal in September 1913. He then participated in the founding of "Union-Flugzeugwerke GmbH" in Teltow near Berlin, where he was involved in the design of new aircraft types as technical director.


Aircraft Development:

  The unique Union Wasserdoppeldecker (sea-biplane) was designed in 1913. The 3-bay floatplane was powered by a 120 hp Austro-Daimler engine. The machine was bought by the German Marine and got the navy number 73, but crashed before the beginning of the war. This machine was built by the Union-Flugzeugwerke GmbH in Berlin-Teltow (Germany), a really small prewar airplane factory which existed from 1912 to 1916.
<...>
Union Flugzeugwerke, Berlin-Teltow (Mark)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The Union-Flugzeugwerke made a few own designed aeroplanes, such as U1, U2, ... and even an own Union-Taube.
<...>
Union U1. Pilot: Walter Stagge. Dr Josef Sablatnig set a new world record on September 27, 1912 with three passengers to a height of 1,120 metres.
Union Pfeildoppeldecker U2 (1912)
Union Pfeildoppeldecker U3 (1913)
Union Pfeildoppeldecker U8 (1914)
Another Union biplane with 120 hp Austro-Daimler engine. The radiator was placed directly into the aircraft's nose behind the propeller.
Small Union Arrow biplane (racer) with four cylinder Rapp-Motor Rp III (1466).
Union Flugzeugwerke, Berlin-Teltow (Mark)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Union engineers Baurat Rittberger and Karl Schopper began the design of a large four-engined bomber in 1914, classified in the Grossflugzeug category because the engines could not be serviced in flight. Constructed of wood with fabric covering, (some parts may have been plywood covered) and wire bracing. The tail unit comprised a single tailplane with elevator with a single fin carrying a rudder and two auxiliary rudders at approx half tailplane span. The G-type aircraft can be assumed as one of the first German 4-engined planes.
  At the successful Idflieg inspection on 13 April 1915, the airframe construction was described as good, but the low cruising and maximum speeds were criticised as well as the disappointing useful load. Flight trials began in May 1915 but the first G.I was damaged and there is no evidence of further flying. The machine was not accepted by Idflieg, so the designation G.I may be spurious.
  The second G.I named "Marga-Emmy" was ordered by Daimler to allow them to rapidly enter the aircraft market. The strengthened second G.I, stationed at Schneidemuhl, flew soon after but was destroyed just before landing on 1 September 1915 after experiencing extreme vibrations from the engines during flight. Development continued as the Daimler R.I.
  On 1 August 1916 the Union-Flugzeugwerke went into liquidation and its assets were taken over by the Norddeutsche Flugzeugwerke, which spent the remainder of the war years repairing aircraft.
Zeppelin-Werke Lindau GmbH (ZWL), (Do)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Luftschiffbau Zeppelin GmbH, a part of the Zeppelin Gesellschaft, also received the request. There, it had long been recognized that the time of the great war airships was over and the company was intensively engaged in aircraft construction. The Lindau plant saw the development of the fast C-airplane as a great opportunity to establish itself in aircraft construction. One of the best and most experienced engineers of the Zeppelin Gesellschaft - Paul Jaray - was appointed to head the project.
  Coming from airship construction, where he had been responsible for the aerodynamic design of all Zeppelins, Paul Jaray was now given the task of developing such an aircraft in the shortest possible time.
  To achieve a higher speed, there were several ways:
   1. as powerful an engine as possible,
   2. the lowest possible empty mass,
   3. a good aerodynamic design and thus low drag,
   4. as small dimensions as possible.
  Paul Jaray knew the Maybach Mb VIa engines used in airship construction very well. In contrast to the BMW BMW.IIIa and Daimler D.IIIa or Oberursel UR.IIa usually used, which ranged in output from 150 to 175 hp, the Maybach Mb.IVa produced 240 hp. It was a water-cooled standing six-cylinder in-line engine with a displacement of 23.1 liters, a compression ratio of 6.08:1, an output of 240 hp (176.5 kW) at 1,800 rpm and an average consumption of 67 liters/hour. The engine was very reliable. Its only disadvantage was the high weight of 400 kg. If the Maybach was to be used, weight had to be saved elsewhere, because the empty mass of the aircraft was not to exceed one ton. This meant, however, that a metal construction or a mixed construction of metal and wood, which Jaray had in mind, was out of the question. The new airplane had to be made entirely of wood and canvas to meet the one-ton requirement. Only the engine had to be partially clad in light metal because of heat generation. By August 1917, the design was completed and submitted for review to the Idflieg (Inspectorate of Air Forces) Commanding General of the Air Forces (Kogenluft). In order not to lose any time, the Zeppelin Company decided to start building two machines immediately, without an official order from the Idflieg.
  The C.I was a two-seat biplane with normal tailplane and fixed slip-spur landing gear of wooden construction. The fuselage with an oval cross-section consisted of wooden frames and longitudinal chords and was wrapped with plywood. This construction method made the fuselage very robust and allowed for an aerodynamically favorable design. The forward fuselage accommodated the large Maybach engine, which protruded significantly above the fuselage contour. To reduce frontal drag, it was carefully clad in light metal sheeting. A sheet steel firewall separated the engine area from the rest of the fuselage. Since the radiator was centered under the upper wing, an appropriate connecting pipe had to be used between the engine and the radiator, which contained the supply and exhaust lines made of copper tubing. The engine directly drove a fixed two-bladed wooden propeller model Heine. Directly behind the fire bulkhead was the fuel tank with a volume of 220 liters.
  The two crew members were accommodated in two separate round-cut fuselage sections, one behind the other. The pilot's cockpit had no wind protection of any kind. The pilot sat low in the fuselage, able to look straight across the long fuselage structure, with the protruding voluminous engine cowling and the connecting tube from the engine to the radiator further limiting visibility. The observer sat on a turntable, so he could operate his various devices, such as camera, later FT-device, as well as in case of attack by enemy aircraft, the swiveling 7.92 mm Spandau machine gun. The ammunition supply for this was 500 rounds. Light bombs were also to be carried, with three mounts for 10 kg bombs attached to each side of the fuselage at the level of the observer's seat.
  By means of two N-struts made of aerodynamically shaped steel tube, it was firmly connected to the corresponding fuselage frames. In addition, there was a bracing to the fuselage. Two further V-posts, one on each side, also made of steel tubing, went from the fuselage at 45 degrees to the wing and were connected there to the longitudinal spars. Directly above the fuselage on the underside of the upper wing was the radiator, designed as a finned radiator. The upper and lower wings were connected on each side by a V-stem of formed steel tubing and were also cross-braced with steel cables running from the bottom of the fuselage to the V-stem connections. The tailplane resembled a rounded triangle and was also a fabric-covered wooden structure, with both spars passing through the rear of the fuselage and also forming a solid box with the spars. This connection was so strong that it could be cantilevered, which was unusual at the time.
  In September 1917, the first machine was completed in Lindau and could be tested. The aircraft generally showed good flight characteristics, only a few minor modifications were necessary, for example the aircraft was slightly top-heavy, caused by the heavy Maybach Mb IVa. This was remedied by slightly lengthening the tail of the fuselage. One complaint was the very poor visibility for the pilot, which was sought to be improved by a higher seating position. By early 1918, the second machine was also completed and had flown by mid-February. Both machines were transferred to Adlershof for the C-type competition, where they were thoroughly tested and found to be good by the frontline pilots acting as test pilots, prompting a series order from Idflieg for 200 units to Luftschiffbau Zeppelin GmbH Friedrichshafen. However, some modifications were required, as well as the substitution of various wartime bottleneck materials and equipment. The most important changes were that the ailerons, elevators and rudders were now made of fabric-covered metal structures, since the wooden frames could not withstand the stresses. The fuel tank was also moved under the pilot's seat and designed to be jettisonable for emergencies to reduce the risk of fire. The design was given the designation C.II and series production began in June 1918.
  Difficulties were encountered in supplying the Maybach engines needed for various models, including the Zeppelin-Staaken giant aircraft, as production did not keep up. By the time the armistice negotiations began on November 8, 1918, only 19 examples of the Zeppelin C.II had been completed.
  By order of the Allied Control Commission, these were to be scrapped. In a night and fog operation, however, the Swiss Air Force acquired all 19 machines, where they were then successfully used as reconnaissance aircraft until 1928.
<...>
Zeppelin (Ja) C.I (1916)
Zeppelin-Werke Lindau GmbH (ZWL), (Do)

  Dipl. Ing. Claude Dornier, born in Kempten on May 14, 1884, joined the Zeppelin Luftschiffbau as early as 1910 and carried out preliminary work for a large steel airship. After the outbreak of war in 1914, Count Zeppelin decided to take up aircraft construction as well, founded a new shipyard in Seemoos and commissioned C. Dornier to develop giant flying boats here. In 1916, factory buildings were added in Reutin near Lindau and Zech on the Bavarian-Austrian border. In 1917, these facilities were transformed into the independent company "Zeppelinwerke Lindau GmbH" (ZWL) and continued to be run by Dornier as managing director. A number of giant flying boats were built in Seemoos, the first of their kind, designed in all-metal construction by Dr. C. Dornier, which today are generally attributed to the Dornier plant, although they were built by the Luftschiffbau Group and Claude Dornier did not build aircraft on his own account in Friedrichshafen until after the First World War.
  Around the time Flugzeugbau-Friedrichshafen GmbH was founded as a new subsidiary of Luftschiffbau for the construction of seaplanes, the decision matured at Zeppelin to find another company - Zeppelin-Werke, Lindau, GmbH.
  The seaplanes developed by Claude Dornier at the Seemoos and Reutin factories bore the military abbreviation "Do".


Aircraft Development:

  The influence of the Lindau developments on wartime events can be considered extremely small. Apart from a few frontline missions of the Rs.III, no Dornier aircraft took part in any significant combat missions. However, the technological advancement of metal aircraft construction by Claude Dornier and his engineers is even more noteworthy. The achievements of the early flying boats had a significant influence on the design of seaplanes of the postwar period and beyond.
  Zeppelinwerke Lindau GmbH was one of the oldest companies on the continent, which for many years considered metal aircraft construction to be its sole task, avoiding the tubular constructions and welding of any kind that were otherwise generally used.
  Large funds provided by the late Count Zeppelin to the head of the company, his long-time employee in airship construction, Mr. Dornier, enabled the company to work on the methodical development of the metal aircraft for over six years as a purely experimental company.
  The experience gained during this time was extremely valuable and became fundamental for metal airplane construction.
  From the very beginning, only high-quality steel and duralumin were used as construction materials. While highly stressed parts, such as spars, engine mounts, spars and the like, were preferably made of hardened steel, duralumin was mainly used for hulls, boats, floats, and spars. The development of, particularly favorable cross-sectional shapes of profiles made of steel and light metal was one of the company's main tasks for many years.
  Extensive load tests with spars, struts, complete wings, and airplanes created the necessary documentation for calculating the aircraft. Hand in hand with this work went the testing of the aircraft in the air.
  The company's field of activity was seaplanes and landplanes of all types and dimensions. From the very beginning, special attention was paid to the construction of monoplanes and aircraft without bracing.
  The factory built and designed airplanes from 160 to 2400 HP and, thanks to its unique experience, was able to meet even the most demanding requirements. The company was particularly involved in the construction of flying boats.
  While the first Dornier flying boat Rs.l, built in 1914/15, still had the usual support floats, the second type Do Rs.II was already an inherently stable hull.
<...>
Rs.I, 1st version with 3 x 145 hp Maybach, of which the center engine was installed between the wings and 2 engines in the hull, the latter driving one airscrew each via driveshafts and angular gears. Not flown due to gearbox problems.
The Rs.I after the modification of the propellers. The bulge of the hull was a stopgap measure to widen the fuselage to make room for the dual control cockpit where pilots sat next to each other.
Rs.I, 2nd version; all 3 engines are mounted on a frame between the wings and directly drive the pusher propellers. The aircraft was flight tested with this engine system successfully.
Zeppelin-Werke Lindau GmbH (ZWL), (Do)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  While the first Dornier flying boat Rs.l, built in 1914/15, still had the usual support floats, the second type Do Rs.II was already an inherently stable hull.
  The flying boat was built as a one-and-a-half decker and four Maybach engines of 240 hp each, supported by the hull under the upper deck, were used for propulsion. The engines were arranged two behind the other, so that two tractor and two pusher propellers were used.
  The upper wing with a span of 33.2 m was supported from the boat by struts arranged in a V-shape. Two rudders and the balanced elevator were arranged on a longer lattice girder. The wing area was 257 m2, the overall length 23.9 m. With an empty weight of 7100 kg, this resulted in a payload of 2200 kg. Although the advantages of this design were obvious, it took several years to overcome the existing prejudices. In the meantime, it has been proven that flying boats of this design are far superior to those with supporting floats in terms of seaworthiness and maneuverability.
<...>
Zeppelin Rs.IIb (1433) (modified, 4 engines) (1916/17)
Zeppelin-Werke Lindau GmbH (ZWL), (Do)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In late 1916/early 1917, the Army's requirement for fast reconnaissance aircraft was formulated. C-planes were already in front-line service, but their top speed, which was about 170 km/h, was too low to escape the faster enemy fighter planes. In the summer of 1917, the demand for a faster C-airplane was consequently made to the industry. Zeppelin-Werke Friedrichshafen was also called upon to draw up corresponding designs.
  In 1917, the experience gained in the construction of metal boat hulls led to a significant new design: the first aircraft with a completely tensionless metal fuselage, type Do. C.I. In the fuselage of this aircraft, the sheet metal covering is not merely a dummy, as in other German metal aircraft, but the completely smooth sheet metal transferred all the stresses that occurred.
<...>
The C.I was a two-seat biplane with normal tailplane and fixed landing gear of wooden construction. Since the radiator was mounted centrally under the upper wing, an appropriate connecting pipe had to be used between the engine and the radiator, in which the supply and exhaust lines were made of copper tubing. The engine directly drove a fixed two-bladed wooden propeller model Heine. The upper and lower wings were connected on each side by a V-strut of molded steel tubing, and were additionally cross-braced with steel cables running from the bottom of the fuselage to the connections of the V-struts.
CL.II (???) production line at Z.W.F. (Friedrichshafen). 19 aircraft were completed but not delivered. After the armistice all aircraft were scrapped by the Swiss Air Force.
Zeppelin-Werke Lindau GmbH (ZWL), (Do)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The same difficulties that initially confronted the introduction and development of the Dornier flying boats also arose in the realization of the idea of replacing the multi-deck airplane, which had previously been the norm.
  The realization of this idea began as early as 1915. The experience gained with the Do Rs.II led to the construction of the Do Rs.III flying boat.
  This type clearly proved that the objections that biplanes were lighter and faster were invalid. With this type, the long-disputed question of boat or two-float aircraft was also decided in favor of the boat.
  While a two-float biplane aircraft equipped with four 260 hp Maybach engines had an empty weight of 9000 kg, the Dornier boat Rs.III, also with four Maybach engines, weighed only 7000 kg. The speed of the Rs.III at full load was 145 km/h, while the biplane only reached about 110 km/h under the same conditions. The flight characteristics of the monoplane boat were also extremely satisfactory.
  A remarkable feature of this boat was the fuselage, which was also placed on the wing and carried the steering devices at its rear end, giving it special military advantages. The wingspan was increased to 37 m and the overall length was reduced to 22.7 m.The wing area was known to be 226 m2, the empty weight 7200 kg and the payload 3500 kg. All the fears that had been raised by experts with regard to the stability characteristics were disproved.
<...>
Zeppelin Rs.III (1431) (1917)
Dornier Rs.III with 4 x 260 hp Maybach engines in tandem arrangement. First takeoff on 4.11.1917, navy no. 1431. The prototype was tested with 3 different tail shapes. The boat also still without hull extensions. The aircraft was transferred to Norderney in February 1918 in a 7-hour nonstop flight for testing with naval aviation in the North Sea. In 1919 it was destroyed by its own crew.
Zeppelin-Werke Lindau GmbH (ZWL), (Do)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  It was only a logical development of the experience gained with the use of sheet metal that in the spring of 1918 the first completely tension-free aircraft with a pure sheet metal construction was launched. In this Do D.I type, the sheet metal skin of the wings was the strength bond of a large hollow beam. With a completely smooth and robust outer surface, a high level of structural safety was achieved, as detailed load tests proved.
<...>
Zeppelin D.I with BMW IIIa engine (1918)
Zeppelin D.I with BMW IIIa engine (1918)
A 1918 Zeppelin D.I All-metal Wireless Scout. One 185 h.p. BMW IIIa engine.
Zeppelin-Werke Lindau GmbH (ZWL), (Do)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1917, the experience gained in the construction of metal boat hulls led to a significant new design: the first aircraft with a completely tensionless metal fuselage, type Do. C.I. In the fuselage of this aircraft, the sheet metal covering is not merely a dummy, as in other German metal aircraft, but the completely smooth sheet metal transferred all the stresses that occurred. The experience with this fuselage was so good that the fuselage of the next R-Type Rs.IV was also made of self-supporting sheet metal with complete success and since then only this design has been used.
<...>
Zeppelin Companies
  
  Ferdinand Graf Zeppelin was born on July 8, 1838 in Constance on Lake Constance and died on March 8, 1917 in Berlin-Charlottenburg. After completing his school education, he began his officer career in the Imperial Army. In 1863, by now in the rank of lieutenant, von Zeppelin was given leave of absence from the army to participate as a military observer in the American War of Secession joining the forces of the Northern States. In his capacity as observer, the Count took part in a reconnaissance flight in a balloon on August 19, 1863. Possibly because of this experience, he subsequently pursued the idea of building aircraft.
  After Graf von Zeppelin's discharge from military service, he became intensively involved with the question of building guided balloons, later referred to as airships. In 1894, Zeppelin presented a concept for a rigid airship to a council of experts, but it found no supporters. Undeterred, the count continued to work on his vision and one year later filed a patent for his idea of an airship.
  In 1898, Zeppelin succeeded in founding the "Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Luftschiffahrt" (Society for the Promotion of Aerostation). More than half of the capital stock of 800,000 marks came from the count's private assets.
  Construction of the first airship, LZ 1, began in 1899, and the first ascent took place a year later, on July 2,1900. The airships LZ 2 and LZ 3 followed in 1906. The fire catastrophe of the LZ 4 in Echterdingen on June 20, 1908, did not mark the beginning of the ruin of the Zeppelin Society, but, thanks to the support of the German people in 1909, the upswing of airship construction in Germany.
  From the proceeds of the national Zeppelin donation, a total of over 6 million marks were collected, Count von Zeppelin founded the "Luftschiffbau-Zeppelin-GmbH" (LZ) with a capital of one million marks. With the remaining donation money, Zeppelin established the "Zeppelin Foundation", which still exists today and is based in Friedrichshafen. The LZ was owned by the Zeppelin Foundation.
  The parent company of all subsequent Zeppelin companies was "Luftschiffbau Zeppelin GmbH", which had initially been founded by Count Zeppelin exclusively for the construction of rigid airships. The company's factory, where the first Zeppelin airship, LZ 1, was built in 1900, was located in Manzell on the northern shore of Lake Constance, seven kilometers west of Friedrichshafen.
  In 1910, Graf Zeppelin succeeded in founding the Delag Luftschiffahrt Gesellschaft (Deutsche Luftschiffahrt A. G.).
  Right at the beginning of the war (August 1914) he gave simultaneously:
   a) to his engineer Claude Dornier from Friedrichshafen the order to build huge metal seaplanes and
   b) to Professor Baumann from Stuttgart the order to build huge land planes.
  New companies were founded for these purposes:
   (a) Zeppelin-Werke GmbH, Lindau, which bought the then Reutin automobile workshops as a factory.
   (b) For the construction of the giant airplanes, the "Versuchsbau Gotha Ost GmbH" was initially founded with capital from Zeppelin and Bosch, whose workshops were housed in the premises of the Gothaer Waggonfabrik in Gotha. It was there that Professor Baumann built his first "R" aircraft, the "VGO".
   (c) Around this time, a new subsidiary of Luftschiffbau, Flugzeugbau-Friedrichshafen GmbH, was founded for the construction of seaplanes. Zeppelin Luftschiffbau (LZ) left its workshops in Manzell to it as a factory. The Flugzeugmeisterei gave it the abbreviated designation "Fdh".
   (d) Since it had to reckon with air raids due to its proximity to the border, it set up new workshops in its airship harbor in Staaken in 1916 near the two large airship hangars that the German government had just built. After the premises in Gotha were no longer sufficient, the operating facilities were also relocated to Staaken, which
   (e) led to the founding of the "Flugzeug-Werft Staaken GmbH".
  In 1917, Flugzeugbau-Friedrichshafen GmbH established an assembly and testing station for seaplanes in Warnemunde, which was named "Flugzeugbau-Friedrichshafen Werft Warnemunde".
  From 1915, Luftschiffbau GmbH used hangars and workshops in Wildpark near Potsdam, a former military hangar in Lowenthal near Friedrichshafen (until 1916), in addition to its factory in Friedrichshafen to increase its production capacity.
  When the demand for airships dwindled, Flugzeug-Werft, Staaken GmbH decided to take over the work carried out in Gotha by Versuchsbau Gotha-Ost GmbH. It adopted a new name: Zeppelin-Werke Staaken GmbH (for the construction of airships and giant aircraft in Staaken).
  In summary, the situation of the Zeppelin companies at the end of World War I was as follows:
   (a) Zeppelin Luftschiffbau GmbH ("LZ"), for the construction of rigid airships. Plants in: Friedrichshafen and Lowenthal.
   (b) Zeppelin-Werke Staaken GmbH ("Staak"), for the construction of rigid airships and giant aircraft. Factory in Staaken.
   (c) Zeppelin-Werke Lindau GmbH ("Do"), for the construction of giant metal seaplanes. Plants in: Reutin and Seemoos.
   (d) Flugzeugbau-Friedrichshafen GmbH (Fdh), for the construction of seaplanes. Plants in: Manzell and Warnemunde.
   (e) Deutsche Luftschiffahrt AG ("Delag")" for the operation of civil air transport companies.
   (f) Zeppelin Gebaude Gesellschaft mbH, for the construction of airship hangars. Headquarters in Berlin, Kurfurstendamm, 13.
   (g) Ballonhullen-Gesellschaft mbH, for the manufacture of balloons, in Berlin-Tempelhof.
   (h) Maybach Motorenbau AG, for the construction of engines for airships and aircraft. Factory in Friedrichshafen.


Zeppelin-Werke GmbH, Staaken near Spandau (Berlin) (Staak)

  In 1913, Hellmuth Hirth, a well-known German aviator, and Gustav Klein, a Bosch director, planned a giant airplane with which they would cross the Atlantic Ocean to America two years later. Count Zeppelin became aware of this. He was very interested, since he was pursuing the same goal, albeit by other means. Count Zeppelin saw no competition in the project, which led to the foundation of the "Versuchsbau GmbH Gotha-Ost" (VGO) in 1914 with Zeppelin's support and participation.
  The workshops provided by the Gothaer Waggonfabrik were soon no longer sufficient to achieve the goals set. This led to R-aircraft construction being transferred to Staaken near Spandau/Berlin, where a shipyard belonging to Luftschiffbau Zeppelin GmbH had already been set up in 1915. From 1915 onward, Luftschiffbau GmbH used hangars and workshops in Wildpark near Potsdam and a former military hangar in Lowenthal near Friedrichshafen (until 1916) to increase its production capacity, in addition to its factory in Friedrichshafen.
  Since the sites on Lake Constance had to expect air raids due to their proximity to the border, Luftschiffbau GmbH set up new workshops in its Staaken airship port in 1916 near the two large airship hangars that the German government had just built. The Flugzeugmeisterei gave it the short name "Staak."
  On January 25, 1918, the Staaken-based plants Luftschiffbau Zeppelin GmbH (Plant I) and Flugzeugwerft Staaken GmbH (Plant II) were merged.The founders of this new company were the same shareholders who had owned the predecessor companies, namely Generaldirektion Luftschiffbau Zeppelin, Friedrichshafen am Bodensee.
  Nevertheless, the parent company of the Zeppelin companies was "Zeppelin Luftschiffbau-GmbH", which had been founded by Count Zeppelin for the construction of rigid airships. The company's factory was located in Manzell on the northern shore of Lake Constance, seven kilometers west of Friedrichshafen.


Aircraft Development:

  Right at the beginning of the war (August 1914), Count Zeppelin commissioned his engineer Dornier from Friedrichshafen to build huge metal seaplanes. Professor Baumann from Stuttgart, on the other hand, was commissioned to build giant land planes.
  To build the giant aircraft, the Versuchsbau Gotha Ost GmbH (VGO) was initially founded with capital from Zeppelin and Bosch, and its workshops were housed in the premises of the Gothaer Waggonfabrik in Gotha. It was there that Professor Baumann built his first "R" aircraft.
  The VGO project was a three-engine biplane with one pulling and two pushing propellers. One engine was located in the fuselage nose section and two in carefully profiled nacelles, "suspended" between planes on the biplane box legs. Such a layout allowed to dispense with a relatively short landing gear struts when using large-diameter propellers. Machine gun turrets were installed at the front end of the engine nacelles, with gunners serving simultaneously as engine mechanics, operating in flight the wing motors. The aircraft was powered by six-cylinder single-row liquid-cooled Maybach engines, similar to those used on Zeppelin airships. For their time they were quite powerful engines, producing up to 245 hp in takeoff mode. However, the reliability of their operation, as they say, left much to be desired, so the crew had to include three engine crew members. The total number of the crew reached 8 people. The construction of the first prototype designated by the index VGO.I was completed surprisingly quickly. Already in April 1915 it took off.
<...>
Zeppelin-Werke GmbH, Staaken near Spandau (Berlin) (Staak)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The first production Zeppelin-Staaken R.IV was not much different from its predecessor VGO.III. However, it was equipped with different engines: in the nose, twin Mercedes D.III engines, and in the wing nacelles, tandem Benz Bz.IV engines turning a single pusher propeller. On the upper wing above the nacelles were mounted turret defenses, which the gunners reached by ladder.
  The first flight of the bomber (serial number R.12/15) made on 16 August 1916. After testing the aircraft was handed over to the military in May 1917. As part of the Rfa 500, the R.IV bombed targets in East Prussia, and the following year it was flown west (as part of Rfa 501) and bombed French territory and the British Isles. The aircraft operated successfully until the end of the war, and after the war was over flew on civilian airlines until April 1919.
<...>
Zeppelin-Werke GmbH, Staaken near Spandau (Berlin) (Staak)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  To meet the Imperial Navy's ideas for a bomber suitable for naval warfare, the Staaken management proposed the Staaken R.VI floatable heavy bomber. This aircraft, designated Staaken L, was ordered on February 15, 1917, and was given the number 1432 by the German Navy. In August 1917, after assembly was completed, the Staaken L, equipped with the standard R.VI wheeled landing gear, was delivered to the company's proving ground at Potsdam, where the aircraft was fitted with floats. Two short flights were made on September 5, 1917. Modifications made during flight testing included replacement of the narrow four-blade propellers with normal two-blade propellers, installation of a center keel to improve track stability, and strengthening of the float structure with additional struts.
  On November 12,1917, the Staaken L left Potsdam for a long-distance flight over nearly half the country. However, due to the failure of an engine, the aircraft was forced to make an emergency landing in Saaler Bodden Bay, forty kilometers east of Warnemunde. After repairs were completed, Staaken L was handed over to the Navy on November 14.
  Except for the floats, the Staaken L was not much different from the normal Staaken R.VI. Minor changes included the sweep of the wing consoles. The sweep began at the centerline of the aircraft and was equal to 1.5°. The ailerons were aerodynamically balanced with large horn compensation areas. To counteract the side drag of the floats, the chord length of the wingtips was increased. The total area of the wings, including ailerons, was increased to 360 square meters. The fuselage streamlined bomb bay of the R-class Staaken R.VI was removed.
<...>
Staaken L (1917)
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  As the military need for R-airplanes grew, the Inspectorate of the Air Force also approached Schutte-Lanz with the desire to produce R-airplanes based on the Staaken model. The enormous dimensions of these aircraft meant that special hangars had to be erected to avoid the parallel production of airships and airplanes in the airship hangar.
  The good flight performance of the in-house developments convinced the military administration to such an extent that, among other things, D- and also R-airplanes were built in series for the front.
<...>
Staaken R.VI (R27/16) with Garuda propeller (built under license by Schutte-Lanz).
Views of Staaken R.VI production aircraft from the R.27-R.29 batch. The Garuda propellers all have two blades. The photo shows the wing camouflage well. The hand-painted camouflage under the wings was not toned down well. (Peter M. Grosz collection/STDB)
In the Staak R.VI R30/16 a separate 120 hp Mercedes D.II drove a Brown-Boveri-compressor (BBC) to improve the high altitude performance.
Staaken R.VI with Daimler D.IVa engine, preceding gearbox and Helix controllable pitch propeller.
Luftfahrzeugbau Schutte-Lanz, Zeesen (SchuI)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  As the military need for R-airplanes grew, the Inspectorate of the Air Force also approached Schutte-Lanz with the desire to produce R-airplanes based on the Staaken model. The enormous dimensions of these aircraft meant that special hangars had to be erected to avoid the parallel production of airships and airplanes in the airship hangar.
  The good flight performance of the in-house developments convinced the military administration to such an extent that, among other things, D- and also R-airplanes were built in series for the front.
<...>
This detail view of a Staaken R.XIVa. A parachute static line (Zugleine) for the co-pilot is visible below the cockpit. (Peter M. Grosz collection/STDB)
Long-range bomber R XIVa with 5 x Maybach at the Staaken plant. CEO Rasch is standing in the middle to the right of the propeller. The center propeller looks optically much larger than the side propellers due to the long nose which is almost 5 m long.
Zeppelin-Werke GmbH, Staaken near Spandau (Berlin) (Staak)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Staak 8301 and later Staak 8302 were sent to Warnemunde for naval trials. The testing program for these aircraft was interrupted by the end of the war and it is believed that the Navy did not accept these machines for service. After the war, an Allied naval commission inspecting German naval bases was struck by the gigantic size of the Staak 8301 and Staak 8302.
  Shortly after the Staak 8301/8302, a slightly improved Staak 8303 series was ordered, which was never delivered to the fleet. Two completed machines, Staak 8303 and Staak 8304, were discovered by the Inter-Allied Control Commission (I.A.C.C.) in the Staaken seaplane hangar at Potsdam's Wildpark. It should be noted that one I.A.C.C. report, which was not always reliable, claimed that three Staaken R-class seaplanes crashed during the tests. The most notable change that distinguished the Staaken 8303 was the return to a small sweep wing similar to that fitted to the Staak R.XIV.
  The Staak floatplanes 8301 thru 8304 were the largest, though not the heaviest, floatplanes ever built.
The French "Integrale" propellers made by L Chauviere were extremely popular and were also initially the most widely used propellers in Germany.
Military aircraft of Schweizerische Waggonfabrik Schlieren SWS C1 (1918).