Книги

Centennial Perspective
M.Dusing
German Aviation Industry in WWI. Volume 1
395

M.Dusing - German Aviation Industry in WWI. Volume 1 /Centennial Perspective/ (84)

Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Foundation:

  In January 1910, the AEG management decided to start building aircraft. To this end, a “Flight Technology Department” was set up, which was attached to the AEG factories in Hennigsdorf. Locomotives were the main product manufactured at this site.
  Initial flying experience was gained with a purchased Wright aircraft, which then led to the construction of a number of experimental types under the direction of Chief Engineer Stumpf.
  The workshops required for this purpose were set up in the rooms of an old sawmill located on the AEG site in Hennigsdorf. In the years that followed, the factory premises required for aircraft construction were continuously expanded.


Aircraft Development:

  In 1910, at the instigation of Mr. Baurat Jordan, a “Flight Technology Department” was added to the “A.E.G.”. The first flying experiences were gained on a purchased Wright machine, which then led to the construction of a series of test types under the direction of the chief engineer Stumpf.
<...>
Second AEG aeroplane from 1911 with 95 hp NAG Type F3 engine.
AEG B.II (Z9) (1915) (???)
Several AEG biplanes (B.I) Z3 and Z6 saving space in an AEG hangar.
Advertisement 1913.
AEG-Wagner (1914) wing testbed held in the Polish Aviation Museum in Krakow.
AEG-Wagner (1914) wing testbed placard held in the Polish Aviation Museum in Krakow.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

  In 1910, at the instigation of Mr. Baurat Jordan, a “Flight Technology Department” was added to the “A.E.G.”. The first flying experiences were gained on a purchased Wright machine, which then led to the construction of a series of test types under the direction of the chief engineer Stumpf. This resulted in an airplane whose main components, such as the fuselage, undercarriage, wing spars and struts, were made of steel. The special feature of this aircraft was that the wings were retractable on the ground. It was therefore possible, without dismantling, to transport the aircraft on a country road and to store it in small tents in the field.
  This resulted in the first military aircraft, the Aeg B.I, in which, in contrast to aircraft from other aircraft factories, all structural parts, such as the fuselage, landing gear, wing spars and stalks, were made entirely of steel, thus guaranteeing weather resistance. The wings were arranged so that they could be pivoted simply by turning them.
  Initially, the aircraft were flight tested at the Teltow airfield, as the AEG site in Hennigsdorf was not suitable for this purpose. Since the long distance between the workshops and the airfield led to various inconveniences, AEG decided in the summer of 1912 to set up its own airfield and flying school in the immediate vicinity of Nieder-Neuendorf.
  In 1913, the first officers were trained on the new A.E.G. aircraft at the Nieder-Neuendorf airfield; at the same time, Captain Mackenthun joined the flight engineering department in that year.
  AEG was the only company that decided to introduce metal aircraft construction right from the beginning. This was based on experience in other branches of industry, where wooden construction was replaced by steel construction in the course of development. Particularly during the war in the construction of large aircraft, these principles proved their worth to a large extent.
  By the spring of 1914, the tests had been completed to such an extent that the military administration ordered and accepted a number of the new aircraft. The experience of the Fliegertruppe soon brought the certainty that the steel construction, which had not been used in aircraft construction until then, was particularly well suited to field requirements.
<...>
Folding wings on a AEG B.I.
Several AEG biplanes (B.I) Z3 and Z6 saving space in an AEG hangar.
AEG B.I (Z6) (1914)
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In addition to this unsuccessful attempt, the A.E.G. factory in Hennigsdorf also built a flying boat in 1914.
<...>
AEG Flying boat (1914)
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Parallel to the development of land aircraft, construction of seaplanes began in early 1914. The first of this type, the Aeg S.I, was a twin-float biplane powered by a 150 hp Benz Bz.III.
<...>
The unsuccessful AEG S1 floatplane being prepared for flight tests in May 1914 on the Havel See near the Hennigsdorf factory. The wings could be folded back for storage. Despite being powered by a 150 hp Benz Bz.III engine, the S1 was too heavy and had poor climb; it was not accepted by the Navy.
AEG S.I (Z-5) 1914.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  After the outbreak of war, further series of this type of aircraft were delivered to the air forces. Although here, too, the design did not give rise to any complaints, and the folding of the wings frequently proved advantageous in warfare, increased climbing ability was required for war-related reasons, which is why a better climbing, fighter machine was designed.
  This type was built in the autumn of 1914/15 according to the specifications of the engineer Georg Konig, who from then on was assigned the management of the design office, while maintaining the metal construction and the folding capability of the wings, and was delivered to the field as the Aeg B.II with a 120 hp Mercedes D.II engine, where it proved itself as a replacement for the earlier types due to the 1,000 m increase in climb performance. In terms of aircraft development, it is interesting to note that this type was the first to undercut the weight of the competing wooden aircraft by means of steel construction. This eliminated a prejudice that had hitherto existed against the use and usefulness of steel aircraft. The introduction of aluminum alloys into aircraft construction further displaced the wooden construction method.
<...>
AEG B.II (Z9) B.260/14 with Daimler (1915) ready for flight.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The same type was later rebuilt as a C-airplane and introduced into the air forces in larger numbers in the summer of 1915 as the Type Aeg C.I with a 150 hp Benz engine, where it was not inferior to the types of other manufacturers in terms of aeronautical performance.
<...>
  In response to the increased demands for the greatest possible climb rate, a modification of the C aircraft was undertaken. The weight of the AEG C.I was substantially reduced to a permissible level. The new type came to the front as the AEG C.II and certainly satisfied the expectations for climbing.
<...>
AEG C.I (KZ9) 75/15 was powered by a 150 hp Benz Bz.III and still used side radiators.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  As an experiment, the C.III type was built, in which the fuselage was designed so that the pilot and observer could see over the upper wings. The performance was essentially the same as that of the C.II aircraft, so the design was not pursued further.
<...>
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In the winter of 1914/15, at the suggestion of the Inspectorate of German Air Forces, AEG engineers worked on a large aircraft that was also designed entirely of steel. Initially, the propellers were located at the front, in contrast to aircraft built later by other companies. This method of mounting the engines made for smooth takeoff and comfortable flying. The two 100 hp Mercedes engines located between the engines in the G.I type were connected to the fuselage and undercarriage by a structurally sound tubular structure, which reduced engine vibration to an acceptable minimum, since the entire mass of the aircraft resisted vibration. This solution also kept the wing system vibration-free. These design features resulted in high operational reliability. The pilot’s seat was located in the center behind the propellers, had a seat for an attendant next to it and a connecting walkway to the balcony, which was intended to prevent accidents during bad landings. This type G.II, which was equipped with two 150 hp Benz engines, was first flown by pilot Kanitz. This giant aircraft was taken into troop service under the designation Aeg G.II in the summer of 1915, where it achieved remarkable success and proved itself as a fighter and bomber. With a wingspan of 16 m, the large aircraft was also the smallest of all competing aircraft and posed fewer difficulties in terms of packaging and accommodation, which was achieved by folding the engines back against the fuselage and thus allowing them to be accommodated in the cargo profile. Road transport was also accomplished without significant disassembly, and stowage in a narrow hangar was made possible by simply folding down the wings.
<...>
  Parallel to the C types, the G-aircraft were developed. The AEG G.II received 220 hp Mercedes engines and was delivered to the Fliegerkrafte as Aeg G.III (1916), where they proved themselves especially as bombers.
<...>
AEG G.II with two 150 hp Benz Bz.III engines
AEG G.II with folded wings. Folding wings were required to transport the aircraft on rails.
Road transport of an AEG G.II
Rail transport of an AEG G.II with removed wings.
Entrance gate of the AEG aircraft factory in Hennigsdorf.
Advertisement 1916.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Partly to take advantage of the improved manufacturing possibilities, partly to meet the increased demands of the front, extensive trials were undertaken in the winter of 1915/16, resulting in the Type AEG C.IV, which, equipped with a 160 hp Mercedes engine, was delivered to the fronts in large numbers. Compared with the earlier machines, this type had no welded fittings, but only turned ones, machined from solid; likewise, all considerations for increasing operational safety and durability had been taken into account. For this reason, the ability of the wings to pivot was dispensed with. Not only was it possible to deliver a very large number of this type to the tropics in the summer of 1917, but it was also possible to license the construction of larger series as training aircraft.
<...>
AEG C.IV (1916)
Aeg C.IV (C.1044/16) being inspected by army commanders.
Repair shop at AEG Flugzeugwerk (1917). On the left side are several AEG C aircraft under repair.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Meanwhile, another series of aircraft types were created on an experimental basis, intended as light C airplanes, of which type AEG C.VII met the higher climb rates required in January 1917.
<...>
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The meanwhile perceived disadvantages of this design led to a completely new design of this type, which, subsequently designated G.IV with two 260 hp engines, served well in the force.
  The urgent desire for even better climbing ability brought about the type AEG G.IVb as an additional variant, in which the wingspan, instead of 18 m for G.IV, was now increased to 24 m. Experience at the front, on the other hand, showed that the controllability and maneuverability of the smaller G.IV was preferred to the cumbersome one with greater climbing ability.
<...>
As a result of the installation of AEG compressors, the peak altitude of 6000 m was reached during a test flight of a G.IV aircraft with 8 people on board.
AEG G.IVb-Lang with larger wingspan of 24 instead of 18 meters. (1918)
AEG G.IVb (1918)
Tests with air baffles on an Aeg G.IV did not lead to an increase in performance.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Meanwhile, another series of aircraft types were created on an experimental basis, intended as light C airplanes, of which type AEG C.VII met the higher climb rates required in January 1917. The same type was also built with a single spar for study purposes to increase speed, and flown as the AEG C.VIII, achieved a speed of 190 km/h. As a triplane, very good climb rates were additionally achieved.
<...>
AEG C.VIII (1917)
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In the spring of 1917, aa AEG D.I fighter was also built on an experimental basis, which, in addition to very good climbing performance, developed a horizontal speed of 210 km/h. As a special feature, it showed wings with a single spar, which reduced the number of bracing cables to a minimum; nevertheless, the strength remained sufficiently high. The same type was designed as a triplane in order to analyze the climb and speed conditions.
<...>
The AEG D.I reached 210 km/h in level flight.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  New requests from the front for an armored aircraft were met by converting the AEG C.IV, which was equipped with a 200 hp Benz engine and complete 400 kg armor plating of the fuselage (including engine), was delivered to the field in larger numbers from 1917 under the designation AEG J.I and had now been replaced by a J.II variant. Balanced control surfaces facilitated takeoff and landing, and this change also resulted in better maneuverability.
<...>
AEG J.Ia (1917)
A civilian AEG J.II of Lufthansa postwar for passenger ferries. The typical swan insignia was placed on the fin.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The need for bombers led to a modification of the proven AEG C.IV design by enlarging the wings as a night plane. After this modification, it showed particularly good climb performance.
<...>
AEG N.I (1916)
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Similarly, an attempt was made to create an armored single-seater to attack the low-flying J planes. The fuselage of this aircraft consisted of an armored hull housing the engine, gasoline tanks, machine guns and pilot. Attached to this was an aluminum tail so that gunfire and flak hits did not damage the power-bearing structure of the aircraft. To increase speed, the same type was also designed as a biplane, in which all bracing was eliminated to achieve greater gunnery safety.
<...>
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In the meantime, the armored J-planes had proven the high value of armor and caused a desire in the troops to also armor G-planes and equip them with machine guns to be able to engage ground targets, such as tanks. In this way, the AEG G.IVk type was born.
<...>
The prototype AEG G.IVk was G.500/18 shown here on the AEG factory airfield at Henningsdorf. The four production aircraft had a different tail design. G.500/18 wears an interesting camouflage of two-color sprayed camouflage on the fuselage, dark engine nacelles, and printed camouflage fabric on the fins and rudders. The 20mm Becker cannon in the nose mounting is prominent. This aircraft was dispatched to the front for operational use in October-November 1918, but it is not known if it was used in combat.
Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft, Flugzeugfabrik, Hennigsdorf (AEG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The constant demand of the front for better-rising and more load-bearing bombers was satisfied by the development of the AEG G.V, which, loaded with a 1,000 kg bomb and
<...>


Situation after WWI:

  After the armistice, AEG converted its Type G.V into a transport aircraft for 10 passengers. In 1919, AEG had then discontinued its aircraft factory as a result of the Versailles Treaty and the associated manufacturing restrictions. The factory was incorporated into the production of the parent factory in Hennigsdorf (electric locomotives, agricultural machinery, etc.).
<...>
AEG G.V Civil (1918)
AEG R.I (1916/17)
Naval Air Station 1913/14.
Otto biplane on floats (1912).
Ago-Flugzeugwerke in Johannisthal.
Ago-Flugzeugwerke in Johannisthal.
Naval Ago C.II.
Ago DV3: single-seat biplane with 100 hp Oberursel U.I rotary engine, normal design and sweep, fully cowled engine, built 1914/15. A two-seat versions also known.
Ago C.III (1915).
Ago C.IX (1917).
Albatros-Werke GmbH, Berlin-Johannisthal (Alb)

  Captain (ret.) Dr. Walther Huth carefully studied the development of aviation, especially the progress in France.
  Believing in the positive signals and in the conviction of a profitable business, Dr. Huth had a hangar built for 6,000 Marks at the first German airfield at Johannisthal near Berlin. The company founded here under the name “Ikaros-Gesellschaft” intended to carry out demonstration flights all over Germany with one and two-seater Antoinette monoplanes. In 1910, a Farman III biplane was added. At the first international air show in August 1909, the Grande Semaine d’Aviation de la Champagne, the Farman machine had won the long distance prize and the Antoinette the high altitude prize. These machines were used as training aircraft and as patterns for license replication in the later Albatros factories. In addition to the Antoinette and Farman types, the three best-known Albatros replicas were the French summer biplane. All aircraft were successfully flown and used in student pilot training.
<...>


Aircraft Development:

  1909/10: The first design launched by Albatroswerke was a monoplane based on the French Antoinette type. A 50 hp Antoinette engine was installed in the 1909 model on an experimental basis, and a 100 hp Gnome rotary engine in the 1910 model.
<...>
Albatros-Werke GmbH, Berlin-Johannisthal (Alb)

  Captain (ret.) Dr. Walther Huth carefully studied the development of aviation, especially the progress in France.
  Believing in the positive signals and in the conviction of a profitable business, Dr. Huth had a hangar built for 6,000 Marks at the first German airfield at Johannisthal near Berlin. The company founded here under the name “Ikaros-Gesellschaft” intended to carry out demonstration flights all over Germany with one and two-seater Antoinette monoplanes. In 1910, a Farman III biplane was added. At the first international air show in August 1909, the Grande Semaine d’Aviation de la Champagne, the Farman machine had won the long distance prize and the Antoinette the high altitude prize. These machines were used as training aircraft and as patterns for license replication in the later Albatros factories. In addition to the Antoinette and Farman types, the three best-known Albatros replicas were the French summer biplane. All aircraft were successfully flown and used in student pilot training.
  In the absence of trained pilots, Dr. Huth sent his chauffeur Simon Brennhuber and the employed engineer Eugen Wiencziers to France to learn to fly.
  On December 20, 1909, the "Ikaros-Gesellschaft“ was renamed „Pilot-Flugtechnische Gesellschaft". Initially, no aircraft were designed, built or sold. The French airplanes, which had arrived in the meantime, were demonstrated at various air shows, mainly by Wienczier, and won several prizes.
  On December 29, 1909, Dr. Huth renamed the company “Albatros-Werke” to implement his acquired license rights to build French airplanes. As early as the spring of 1910, with the participation of other financiers, including engineer Otto Wiener, the “Albatros-Werke” was transformed into a limited liability company GmbH.
  The Farman aircraft, imported from France by Albatroswerke, was sold to the Army Administration on December 18, 1910, having already been loaned out for military pilot training at Doberitz. Under the Army designation “B.I”, it was the first German military aircraft. Among the five other “flying machines” acquired by the German Army Administration at the end of 1910 were a Farman and a Sommer biplane, two French types copied from Albatros. In 1911, further important development steps followed with the first in-house design, the MZ 1 twin pigeon, and with the victory of Benno Konig on Albatros-Farman in the Deutschlandflug.
  During 1912, five Albatros F.2s were built, a further development of the French Farman III biplane (hence the letter F) with a gondola for the crew and Argus in-line engine instead of the original Gnome rotary engine. Four aircraft were delivered to the newly formed Bulgarian Aircraft Department, where they participated in the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913. One of them flew its first military mission in the skies over Europe on October 16,1912.
<...>


Aircraft Development:

<...>
  1911: In this year the company released an improved Sommer-Farman type, equipped with 70 hp Gnome 7-cylinder rotary engine. The flight requirements placed on the flying machine were: Minimum speed: 60 km/h. The aircraft must be able to fly for 30 minutes at an altitude of at least 300 m with foil load. The takeoff distance was not allowed to exceed 50 m.
  At the same time, a military type was also created: M.Z. 2, a biplane with a 100 hp Argus engine weighing 480 kg, equipped with two protected seats and dual controls with levers. The engine was located in the rear, pressurized propeller. Speed was 80 km/h. At the end of the year, another Farman type with 50 hp Gnome and 70 hp Renault engine was developed. The required performances were now: Minimum speed 60 km/h, 2 hours flight time at minimum altitude 300 m.
  1912/13: During this period the military type 1912 (VM.Z. 1) was built, which was a biplane equipped with a 100 hp Argus engine. The total weight was 420 kg, the payload 300 kg. Fuel was available for 4 hours, maximum speed was 90 km/h.
<...>
Albatros Doppeltaube B.22a/12 (1913)
Albatros-Werke GmbH, Berlin-Johannisthal (Alb)

Aircraft Development:

1912/1913:<...>
  Another design was a seaplane for military purposes under the type designation W.M.Z. (Wasser-Militar-Zweidecker), which had the military designation D.5, designed as a biplane with a 100 hp Argus engine and a pressurized propeller. Acceptance of the aircraft took place in August 1912.
Naval Air Station 1913/14.
With this Albatros water biplane, the Kaiserliche Marine made its first attempts at wireless communication as early as 1912. In addition to the antenna wires, various parts of a radio system can be seen.
Albatros-Werke GmbH, Berlin-Johannisthal (Alb)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  As a result of the outbreak of war, aircraft types were created to meet the requirements of the army administration.
  The first type to emerge was the Alb B.I, a three-strut military biplane equipped with the 100 hp six-cylinder Daimler D.I engine. The aircraft still had side coolers and a 6-hour fuel tank. The climb time to 800 m was 8 1/2 minutes.
<...>
Werner Landmann set a new endurance world record with his Albatros biplane with 21 hours 49 minutes and a world distance flight record of 1,900 km.
Alb B.I (1914).
Albatros-Werke GmbH, Berlin-Johannisthal (Alb)

Aircraft Development:

1912/1913:<...>
  In further development, after the Breguet type, a biplane with a 70 hp Renault engine was released, which had an hourly speed of 85 km/h with a 200 kg payload. The 1912 type, which preceded this biplane, was a three-seater with a 100 hp Argus engine that reached 500 m altitude in 10 minutes with a payload of 300 kg. The flight requirements for the same were: Action radius 250 km, climbing ability 500 m in 15 minutes, measured in circular flight.
  To meet the further requirements, the company launched the D.E. type. It was equipped with a 100 hp Argus engine. The load capacity was also 300 kg. Fuel for 4 hours could be accommodated. The requirements were: Action radius 250 km, climbing ability 500 m in 15 minutes, minimum speed 80 km/h, were achieved or exceeded in the hourly speed, which was determined to be 90 km/h.
Advertisement 1914, Motor.
Albatros-Werke GmbH, Berlin-Johannisthal (Alb)

Aircraft Development:

  1913: In this year the company launched a monoplane (Taube) under the designation Type E.E. The climb time for 800 m altitude with military load (200 kg and 4 hours of operating fuel) was 10 to 15 minutes. The maximum speed was between 100 and 105 km/h.
  1914: Further development of the Taube resulted in the type FT., a military monoplane whose fuselage was made of plywood. The climb time was 800 m in 8 minutes with a prescribed payload (200 kg and fuel for 4 hours).
Kathreiner Prize: From Puchheim near Munich to Berlin in five hours: Hellmuth Hirth on his Albatros Taube in 1911.
This seaplane is a mystery. According to the Navy Directory, this was a Brandenburg Type W.1 built at KW in Danzig. Other sources (J. Herris in [Albatros Aircraft of WWI, Vol. 3,]) refer to this seaplane as the Albatros W.1.
Alb W.1 (WDD)(1916).
Albatros-Werke GmbH, Berlin-Johannisthal (Alb)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Shortly thereafter followed the improved model with military designation B.II also with a speed of up to 108 km/h. The climb time to 8,000 m was reduced to 5 minutes with a full load (operating fuel for 4 hours with a payload of 200 kg).
<...>
Albatros B.II(Rol) [Rol B.I] (1914/15)
Albatros B.II(Bay) (1916/17); note wooden wheels.
Alb B.II (1914).
Alb B.IIa (Mercedes) on skiis (1917).
Alb B.IIa(Li) (1917/18)
Aircraft production line at Kondor. Final assembly of Albatros B.II.
Albatros B.IIa(Kon) (1918)
Albatros-Werke GmbH, Berlin-Johannisthal (Alb)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The Albatros B.IIIs had a basically similar superstructure to their predecessors, but already achieved speeds of up to 140 km/h. The engines used were 100 or 120 hp Mercedes D.I and D.II engines or 150 hp Benz Bz.III. Climbing speeds continued to decline (at full load: 800 m in 12 minutes, 2,000 m in 40 minutes).
<...>
Albatros B.III S.171 was a landplane serving with the German Navy. Powered by a 100 hp Mercedes D.I, it was Albatros Work Number 902.
Alb C.I (1915).
A wingless Albatros C.I.
Alb C.Ia (1917).
Albatros C.Ia(Bay) (1917)
Alb C.If (1917) (Argus As.III).
Alb C.II (1916).
Alb C.III(Li) (1917).
Albatros C.III(Bay) (1917)
Alb. C.V/17; airfoil radiator, rounded lower wingtips.
During its takeoff an Albatros C.V/17 of FliegerAbteilung 2 displays its elegant streamlining.
Alb C.X(Li) before acceptance. The Alb D.II standing in front was not part of the production range.
Albatros D.II(LVG) [LVG D.I] (1916)
D.III D.636/17, which served with FliegerAbteilung 300 Pascha, is shown here after being captured in the Middle East. The wheels are replacements from a British aircraft; the originals were damaged in towing it back to the British squadron. The additional over-wing radiator, visible in the photo before capture, has been removed.
Albatros D.III with ground crew in front of an airship hangar.
Alb D.III (Oaw) (1916).
This appears to be the Albatros G.III prototype. The engines are mounted above the lower wing in streamlined nacelles, the single-bay interplane struts are normal size, and the upper wing span has been increased but the ailerons have no aerodynamic balances. The G.III discarded the nose landing gear used by the G.II.
Albatros W.4 prototype Marine Number 747.
Alb C.IX (1916).
Albatros C.X(Li) 8306/16 was one of the first C.X aircraft built under license by Linke-Hofmann. Intended for aircraft training, the aircraft built by Linke-Hofmann had full operational equipment.
Alb C.X(Li) before acceptance. The Alb D.II standing in front was not part of the production range.
Albatros C.XII(Bay) (1917/18)
Alb D.Va (1917).
In terms of orders, the D.V was the most successful Albatros design. Earlier Albatros fighters were much more successful in combat; they were more robust and faced less advanced Allied fighters. The headrests were soon removed.
Немецкая почтовая открытка времен Первой мировой войны с фотографией одного из первых экземпляров "Альбатроса" D.V.
Alb D.V (1917).
Alb. D.Va(OAW). (1917)
Hannover Han C.III after a taxi accident with an Alb D.V.
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The first “Aviatik” aircraft was a biplane with a rear-mounted engine and propeller. The appearance of this type was similar to the well-known French designs.
<...>
The first attempt at Automobil und Aviatik GmbH was a disaster (1910).
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  For the seaplane competition in Heiligendamm in October 1912, the company redesigned the above-mentioned biplane into a seaplane. In addition to this WDD (wingspan 20 m, 100 hp Argus engine), construction was also completed on the monoplane then based on the Etrich pigeon, on which Jeannin won 1st prize at the Schwabenflug in September 1911.
<...>
Early Aviatik seaplane during a competition at Lake Constance. Center float and floats under the wings.
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  For the seaplane competition in Heiligendamm in October 1912, the company redesigned the above-mentioned biplane into a seaplane. In addition to this WDD (wingspan 20 m, 100 hp Argus engine), construction was also completed on the monoplane then based on the Etrich pigeon, on which Jeannin won 1st prize at the Schwabenflug in September 1911.
<...>
Aviatik monoplane (E12) developed in Mulhouse i.E.
Pre-war Aviatik monoplane outside the Aviatik factory. The design is not quite a Taube. Aviatik made its reputation before the war with sturdy biplanes and all Aviatik wartime designs that were built were single-engine biplanes.
A forerunner of the Aviatik P.13 (1913/14), which was later built in series.
Aviatik P13 (B type) (1913)
Pilot Stoffler and his Aviatik P15 after the record flight to Warsaw (1913).
Viktor Stoeffler with an LVG DD (???)
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  During the war, Automobil- u. Aviatik A.G. achieved successes that testified to a skilful ability to adapt to the increased and constantly growing demands placed on military aircraft by the army administration in terms of flight characteristics and combat capability.
  In 1914/15, the first C airplanes were built. The Av C.I with a 160 hp Mercedes engine and frontal radiator reached a top speed of 142 kph. A striking feature was that the observer sat in front of the pilot. This resulted in a better field of fire.
<...>
Aviatik C.I (1915)
Aviatik C.I(Han) (1915).
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The type Av C.III (built in 1916), also with Mercedes D.III engine, was aerodynamically improved to such an extent that its top speed already reached 160 km/h. This was achieved by reducing the damaging frontal drag, installing a wing radiator and modifying the wing profile and torpedo-like fuselage shape.
<...>
Aviatik C.III (1916)
Aviatik C.IV (1916)
Aviatik C.VI (1917)
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In the class of D airplanes, the Av D.II should be mentioned: 1916 model year, 160 hp Mercedes D.III, hydrofoil radiator. The front part of the fuselage, especially canopy, engine mount and undercarriage were a complete steel tube construction. The driver’s seat was mounted on the extended continuous U-beams of the engine foundation.
<...>
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The type Av C.V was created in 1917, powered by a 180 hp Argus engine, had a cranked upper wing with direct connection to the upper fuselage spar, or to the corresponding transverse frames. The purpose of connecting the upper wing to the fuselage was to create an improved upward field of view and firing.
<...>
Experimental Aviatik C.V. of 1917 with "gull" upper wings (180 h.p. Argus As III engine). Embodies Vee-strut Warren Type wing-bracing.
The Aviatik C.V was a significant departure from earlier Aviatik two-seat aircraft. Its interesting wing design was chosen to optimize visibility and the observer's field of fire upward. The pilot was finally moved to the front cockpit and equipped with a fixed, synchronized machine gun.
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1917, the Av C.VIII single-aisle airplane with a frontal radiator was created. To achieve greater wing spacing, the fuselage was given a keel-like attachment for mounting the lower wings.
<...>
The prototype Aviatik Type C VIII Biplane of 1917, using a 160 h.p. Mercedes D.III engine.
The Aviatik C.VIII was a small, single-bay biplane apparently designed as a light C-type.The C.VIII remained a prototype; the Halberstadt and Hannover designs were produced in quantity instead and both were very successful.
Aviatik C.IX (1917)
Fuselage of the Av D.IV prototype with built-in V8 engine Benz Bz IIIbv (195 hp).
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The type Av D.VII, equipped with the V8 high-speed Benz Bz.IIIbo engine, was capable of looping and swooping flights thanks to a reinforced design.
<...>
Evolved from the Cl I, the BFW Cl III featured longer-span wings and a Benz Bz IV engine.
BFW monoplane prototype powered by a 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine.
Hanseatische Flugzeugwerke AG (Karl Caspar), Hamburg-Fuhlsbuttel (Hansa)

Foundation:

  Karl Caspar learned to fly on Etrich-Taube and received the pilot certificate No. 77. In 1911, at the age of 28, he laid the foundation stone for his company. In the fall of 1911, Mr. Karl Caspar founded the local company, which at that time consisted of a small flight school under the name “Centrale fur Aviatik Hamburg” on the Wandsbek parade ground. The transformation into a stock corporation took place on January 1,1917.
  A fire accident in the summer of 1912 led to the company being relocated to a more suitable airfield - Hamburg-Fuhlsbuttel. The Hanseatische Flugzeugwerke were rebuilt there on the basis of a contract with the Hamburg Luftschiffhafen-Gesellschaft, which had already leased another hangar to the Navy.
  Caspar was by all means a successful pilot: on June 19, 1912, he set a German altitude record of 3,245 m with a Rumpler pigeon on the occasion of the Nordmarken flight. He achieved further successes at the “Krupp Flight Week 1912” and the “East Prussia Flight 1913”.
  In 1914, the company name changed from “Centrale fur Aviatik Hamburg” to “Hansa-Flugzeugwerke Hamburg Karl Caspar,” while the flying school was henceforth known as the “Hanseatische Flugschule”. At the outbreak of the First World War, Caspar immediately fulfilled his so-called “army duty” and reported for military service with the Fliegertruppe. In order not to leave his company without management for a long time during wartime, he negotiated a merger of his company with the “Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke GmbH” in Briest near Brandenburg (Havel) and the “Deutsche Aero-Gesellschaft AG” in Berlin in 1915. The new company was named “Hansa- und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG,” and Berlin was set as its headquarters, with operating facilities in Berlin, Hamburg and Briest. The main shareholder of the merged plants was the Vienna-based Kommerzialrat Camillo Castiglioni, who also held the position of general manager.
<...>
Caspar after returning from his first bombing flight towards Dover/England (1914). As a war pilot, Lieutenant Caspar was the first to fly a Gotha-Hansa Taube and bombs across the English Channel to Dover in October 1914.
Hansa flying school.
Advertisement 1913.
Hansa-Taube in flight.
Hanseatische Flugzeugwerke AG (Karl Caspar), Hamburg-Fuhlsbuttel (Hansa)

Aircraft Development:

  When the “Hansa- und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG” was founded, Karl Caspar reserved the right to spin off the Hamburg company again and also made use of this right at the beginning of 1917 when he was again dismissed by the army administration to manage his former company. The “Hanseatische Flugzeugwerke Karl Caspar AG” was now founded.
  When in the summer of 1916 an explosion destroyed the zeppelins in the hangar and also the roof of the airship hangar, the Navy decided to abandon the hangar. Caspar had the roof repaired and took over this hangar on a lease basis.
  Apart from the two two-seater Hansa Taube (with 50 hp Rumpler “Aeolus” and 95 hp NAG engine respectively) in 1912 and a replica of the Gotha Taube (Gotha-Hansa Taube) with 105 hp Daimler D.I engine, no other pre-war aircraft were manufactured.
<...>
Hanseatische Flugzeugwerke AG (Karl Caspar), Hamburg-Fuhlsbuttel (Hansa)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Between 1917 and 1918, a twin-engine (2 x 110 hp Oberursel UR.II or LeRhone) biplane was built. During a test run, an engine mount broke and fatally injured an assembler. As a result, further development activities were abandoned. Further attention was focused on the licensed production of Albatros C.III reconnaissance aircraft as well as Friedrichshafen Fdh G.III and G.IIIa.
  Under the (unconfirmed) designation HFC D.I, construction of a 2-engine single-seater fighter developed by Ernst Heinkel was begun before the end of the war. However, Ernst Heinkel was not contractually employed by Caspar for about a year until mid-1921, which again casts doubt on the origin statement. After an engine mount failed during testing and a mechanic was fatally injured, this project was abandoned.
Experimental construction of the twin-engine "HFC", 1918.
Daimler-Motoren-Gesellschaft AG, Stuttgart-Sindelfingen, Abteilung Flugzeugbau (Daim)

Aircraft Development (since the Outbreak of World War I):

  An aircraft factory with its own company airfield was built very close to the Boblingen military airfield. Daimler Motoren AG did not play small when it came to the hangars and hangars. However, due to a lack of in-house expertise and skilled personnel, the development contract for the first multi-engine large combat aircraft was awarded to the Union company in Teltow near Berlin. Not such a good choice, because the four-engine Union-Daimler G.I (also R.I) broke down early on, prompting DMG to pursue in-house development under the direction of Karl Schopper, until then the engineer in charge at Union-Flugzeugwerke.
  In the spring of 1916, a four-engine large combat aircraft (R.I) was produced, each with two engines in tandem. However, the expectations for this aircraft were not met.
<...>
The Daimler R.I was can be distinguished from the earlier R.II by its re-designed engine nacelles. Internal improvements were also made but were not visible. Poor performance and flying qualities quickly doomed the R.I.
Daimler-Motoren-Gesellschaft AG, Stuttgart-Sindelfingen, Abteilung Flugzeugbau (Daim)

Aircraft Development (since the Outbreak of World War I):

<...>
  This was followed by a lighter aircraft (R.II), equipped with 2 x 220 hp Mercedes engines, which again did not show positive flight characteristics.
<...>
Daimler G.II (pusher) (1917).
Daimler-Motoren-Gesellschaft AG, Stuttgart-Sindelfingen, Abteilung Flugzeugbau (Daim)

Aircraft Development (since the Outbreak of World War I):

<...>
  A third large combat aircraft (G.III) was then built, which had two 260 hp engines in the fuselage. The propellers were driven by a gearbox. The excessive weight of this third prototype was again the reason for insufficient results, so that this type was also not pursued further.
<...>
The Daimler L11 fighter prototype was powered by Daimler's Mercedes D.IIIbm geared V-8 engine; here it is seen in its final configuration with vane-balanced ailerons. It had a top speed of 240 km/h, fast for its time despite requiring wing bracing. Compare the wing design with the Fokker D.VIII which had cantilever wing. A two-seat fighter derivative designated the L14 also offered excellent performance.
The sole Daimler L11 which was the first aircraft wholly designed by Hanns Klemm.
Daimler L14 in postwar Daimler insignia.
DFW Mars biplane. (1913)
Prince Heinrich, the brother of Kaiser Wilhelm II, has his aircraft explained to him at the ALA exhibition stand of Deutsche Flugzeugwerke. The prince was a relentless supporter of the navy and aviation. The prince obtained his pilot's license at August Euler's flight school.
DFW C.V(Halb) (1916/1917)
DFW C.V C.9036/16 reconnaissance aircraft.
DFW C.V (1916/17; most produced German WWI warplane)
This reconnaissance aircraft was a major success and over 1.000 were produced.
DFW C.Vc with C.lll Nagb engine (1917)
DFW CV(Av) (1917)
DFW advertisement.
The three gun positions in the DFW R.I are clearly shown in this view. (Peter M. Grosz Collection/SDTB)
The DFW D.II (internal factory designation F 34), powered by a Mercedes D.IIIa, was entered in the Second Fighter Competition. Like the T 34 prototypes it was rejected before the flight evaluations began, but the reasons are not known. (Peter M. Grosz Collection/SDTB)
DFW C.VII (F37) (1918)
Dorner's monoplane (1911).
August Euler Flugzeugwerke, Darmstadt and Frankfurt a.M. (Eul)

Foundation:

  August Euler initially founded his own automotive parts company in 1903. By founding his “Handelshaus fur Automobilkonstruktionsmaterial”, he successfully monopolized the sale of products from German, French, English and Belgian companies. From 1903 to 1908, Euler had great success selling ignition systems made by Bosch in Stuttgart, which helped him to become wealthy in a short time.
  The passion for the automobile was decisive for Euler’s further development. The constant exposure to the rapidly developing automotive technology and the associated financial success formed the basis for his real life’s work, aviation. August Euler was not only an industrialist, but remained a sportsman, now, however, no longer as a bicycle racer, but as an automobile driver. Through his active participation in various automobile races, including in France, where he won the long-distance automobile race Barcelona-Paris in 1906, contact was made with French aviation pioneers who were also initially addicted to automobile racing. Among them were the future pilots Bleriot, Delagrange and Farman.
  In 1908, Euler visited the aeronautical exhibitions in Paris. During this visit, August Euler and the Voisin brothers agreed on the basic elements of a license agreement, which included “the exclusive right of sale and the exclusive right of reproduction” of the Voisin apparatuses, including applicable patents in Germany. The contract, which was concluded on January 18, 1908, provided for the delivery of an airworthy apparatus of the latest design by mid-December 1908.
  In anticipation of prompt delivery, August Euler intended to set up his factory at his home in Frankfurt am Main. Without being able to designate a specific location for his new company, Euler registered a trade for a flying machine factory with the city of Frankfurt in October 1908. The foundation stone for the oldest German aircraft factory had been laid. The city administration itself had the greatest reservations and was rather “outweighed by the fear of being put in the wrong light with this new-fangled business idea.”
Typical Euler trainer for Prussia (1912-14).
Euler flight machine "Yellow dog" in different sizes. (1912-14)
Typical Euler biplane trainer until 1913/14.
Euler biplane ("Gelber Hund" - "Yellow Dog'") is overflying the troops at the Kaisermanover 1911.
Rollout of an early Euler biplane in Griesheim/ Darmstadt.
Eul B.I (first batch) with nose wheel. (1914)
Euler B.I aircraft in front of Euler works at the Griesheim airfield near Frankfort.
Eul B.I (last batch). (1914)
Mercedes D.I installation in Eul. B.I.
Eul single-seat combat airplane (1915)
Eul two-seater combat airplane (1915)
The Euler D II was a more powerful derivative of the D I, but, owing to tardy delivery, shared the earlier fighter's fate in being relegated to the fighter training role.
Eul D.I. (1916/17)
Eul D 5 fighter prototype. (1918)
Eul D 6 fighter prototype. (1918)
Eul D.R.4 prototype (1915)
The first Euler single-seat fighter triplane was designed by Julius Hromadnik and was under test in the summer of 1917.
The only prototype Euler Dr 4 was powered by a 160 hp Oberursel U.III. It was designed as a testbed to compare biplanes and triplanes.
Eul D.R. 9 triplane fighter prototype. (1917/18)
Little is known about this development of the M.1. It had a 70-h.p. Renault engine, a modified fuselage and simplified cabane bracing.
Fokker A.I A20/16 after internment at Soesterberg airfield in Holland. (F. Gerdessen collection via Peter M. Grosz collection/STDB)
Fok A.II (M5L) (1915)
Fok E.I (M5KMG) (1915)
Fokker fighter E.III 410/15 after repair (M14) (1915).
When we see E.III 410/15 next, the fuselage and rudder carried updated markings while the wings retained their 1915-style national insignias. (Peter M. Grosz collection/STDB)
Three guns on Wintgens Fokker E.IV.
Один из серийных "фоккеров" D.I. В отличие от большинства ранних истребителей Фоккера, эта машина имеет развитый киль.
Another aircraft serving with Jagdstaffel 1 was Fokker D.I 216/16. The works number 861 has been marked at the bottom of the rudder and the forward lower fuselage, just behind the radiator. On the lower wing, the two-color camouflage scheme can barely be made out from this perspective. This was a late-production aircraft mounting the small radiator.
Although this M.17E is here represented as the 500th Fokker aeroplane, this is doubtful. Some records indicate that the Factory No. 500 belonged to a Fok. E.II accepted on March 20, 1916. In the group of men, Kreutzer is to the left of the engine, Platz to the right. Next to Platz is de Waal. This M.17E had a 100-h.p. Oberursel.
Fok D.II (M17) (1916)
Fok D.III (M19) late production with ailerons. (1917)
Fok D.IV with experimental nose (M21). (1916)
Fok D.VII(Alb).
Fok D.VII(OAW) 8520/18, one of the four D.VII fighters that were flown by the Victory Loan Eastern Flights in the USA, with another D.VII behind.
Fokker, in the cockpit of F.I No. 102/17, speaks to General von Lossberg. To the right of von Lossberg is Manfred von Richthofen
Fok Dr.I (1917)
Fok V20 (1918)
Fok D.VII (1918)
One of the three two-seat Fokker C. Is acquired with the fifty Fokker D VII fighters in 1922 for use as transitional trainers.
Load trials.
1914: A monoplane of the Luft-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft (Air Traffic Company) (10 men).
1918: A braceless Fokker one-seater D VIII (24 men on carrying surface).
1922: A Junkers plane in the Research Department Dessau: 42 men on one wing.
A Friedrichshafen FF 19 is placed on wheels to be rolled out of the construction hall.
Fdh FF33S (1916-18). The FF33S was a sea-going two-seat trainer. In terms of design, the aircraft was a remodeled FF 33J, 30 machines built.
FF33S 3019. Roland built 22 of this type (MNs 789-790 & 6501-6520) under license.
Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen FF38, here the G.II 6xx/16 built at Daimler DMG, Section Flugzeugbau.
Friedrichshafen G.II(Daim) 625/16 was the first Friedrichshafen bomber built by Daimler, which produced 298 Friedrichshafen bombers under license. Here it is undergoing its type test at Adlershof in April 1917. The G.II was the first Friedrichshafen twin-engine bomber design to see production and operational service and established the basic pattern followed by all subsequent Friedrichshafen bomber designs.
Fdh G.III(Hansa)
Friedrichshafen G.III(Daim) 25X/17 sports its iron cross high on its rudder, characteristice of Daimler-built G.IIIs.
Fdh G.III(Hansa)
Friedrichshafen G.IIIa(Daim) 1052/18.
FF49C(Rol) 1842, the first of 15 of this Roland-built batch.
Germania Flugzeugwerke GmbH, Leipzig-Mockau

Foundation:

  The beginnings of Germania-Flugzeugwerke GmbH date back to 1910, when the former director of the Erwin Leiber company in Gohrwihl in the Black Forest undertook experiments with wooden strip tubes for aircraft fuselages and wing spars. In 1912, the company was founded under the name “Rathjen & Co.” in Berlin-Teltow, and on December 17, it was transformed into the above-mentioned company.
  Subsequently, Works II (in Leipzig-Mockau, Leipziger Str. 200b) and Works III in Leipzig-Sellerhausen,Torgauer Strasse, were established as subsidiaries.


Aircraft Development:

  In 1912, a Taube with a round fuselage and with wings made of wooden strip tubes was the first of this design. This design represented a significant advance for the time, as this first “Wickelrumpf” (wounded fuselage) (made of wooden strip) can be considered the forerunner of the later veneer fuselages. With further improvements, two more pigeons of this design were built, equipped with 100 hp Argus engines, which were accepted by the Army Administration and the Navy in 1914 according to the regulations prescribed at that time.
<...>
Germania KDD prototype was powered by a 150 hp Benz Bz.III engine and used side radiators.
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Foundation:

  The company was founded on July 1,1898 in Gotha as a wagon factory. Subsidiaries in Furth (Bavaria) and Warnemunde were under construction until the end of the war. However, aircraft construction did not start until the end of 1912.


Aircraft Development:

  In 1913, construction of the first Taube began, still in a primitive design with a trapezoidal fuselage covered with fabric and fitted with a large tangle of bracing wires. The undercarriage was the original of the Taube designs with hinged wheels. The first Tauben were equipped with 70 hp 4 cyl; 75 hp 6 yl, 100 hp 6 cyl, Mercedes and 100 hp 4 cyl Argus engines. The climbing ability of the pigeons designed at that time, which had a total weight of about 650 kg and handled a payload of 250 kg, was good. They reached 800 m altitude in 15 minutes, and the speed was between 80 and 95 km/h.
<...>
  In 1913, only the Gotha-Taube was produced in series, the improvement of which, especially in the comfortable arrangement of the pilot’s seat, resulted in a substantial increase in the dead weight by widening the fuselage. It should also be mentioned that the bracing and controls were also improved, which made the Gotha-Taube popular as a comfortable, safe and easy-to-fly representative of military aviation.
  The year 1914 began with the insistent demand for better flight performance of all Tauben in general, which could no longer be postponed. Although the “Tauben” in general showed significant progress in the development of flight technology, they could not compete with the biplanes, which were in fierce competition. The company soon decided to reduce the development work on the Tauben and turned to the production of biplanes in series.
<...>
  The old popularity of the Taube in the field did not allow it to disappear so quickly in production, because a number of pilots who had used the Taube in the beginning could not let go of it so quickly. For this reason, they tried to adapt it better to the requirements of war, developing an enlarged tank, more comfortable interior and easier rigging.
  The Tauben had remarkable flight successes on September 2, 1914, when they circled over Paris in a squadron flight. It was reserved for the Gotha Taube to be the first aircraft (pilot Lt. Caspar) to fly to England (Dover) during the war.
  It is also worth mentioning that in cross-country flights the Taube already had significant successes in pre-war times. In the national flight competition, Schlegel won the 1st prize of 60,000 marks on the Gotha Taube after Stoeffler’s world record, and Lieutenant Caspar won the 2nd prize of 50,000 marks.
<...>
Lieutenant (ret.) Caspar achieved a German altitude record on Gotha-Taube. (Engine: V8 Aeolus).
Karl Caspar after his high-altitude flight in 1912 (3,245 m) with Gotha-Taube. Engine: Rumpler V8 Aeolus.
Advertisement 1913.
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The year 1914 began with the insistent demand for better flight performance of all Tauben in general, which could no longer be postponed. Although the “Tauben” in general showed significant progress in the development of flight technology, they could not compete with the biplanes, which were in fierce competition. The company soon decided to reduce the development work on the Tauben and turned to the production of biplanes in series. The first light biplane, at that time also called cavalry biplane, was produced, as well as a heavy one, which was called B-machine. The light biplane was soon abandoned, however, because the pilots were not happy with the built-in Gnom rotary engine. The company had better luck with the heavy biplane, which was equipped with a 120 hp 6-cylinder Mercedes engine.
<...>
Gotha LD 5 (1914) with rotary engine and Integral propeller (Chauviere design).
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  At the end of 1913, trials of light and heavy biplanes were undertaken. Based on the French model, Caudron design, the LD3 light biplane was equipped with a 50 hp Gnome rotary engine with 7 cylinders.
<...>
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Although there was no dedicated water area near Gotha for testing seaplanes, construction was nevertheless initiated in 1913, as already mentioned.
  The first seaplane, type WD1, was built, a biplane equipped with a 100 hp Gnom engine (14 cylinders). In February 1914, this aircraft was flown into Warnemunde. Later, by agreement, the city of Rostock built factory facilities and hangars at Breitling, which could already be used at the time of the first naval competition for seaplanes (August 1-10, 1914). The WD1 type with a 100 hp Mercedes D.I engine went into production.
  For this competition, the company already provided a second type, the WD2 with 150 hp Rapp Rp.III engine.
  At the outbreak of the war, which prevented the realization of the competition, the company’s branch was taken over by the Naval Administration and formed the core of the Warnemunde Naval Air Station.
  The seaplanes intended for the competition were accepted after fulfilling the acceptance conditions, and a larger number, whose delivery took place at the end of 1914, were built. In the spring of 1915, additional seaplane types WD3, WD5, WD7 and UWD were built.
<...>
  At the further instigation of the Reichs-Marine-Amt, the WD2 type was modified so that it could also take off and land from land, i.e. it was an amphibious aircraft. The reason for this modification was the fact that seaplanes were to be delivered to Turkey, but Romania did not allow the overflights. It was for this reason that, in order to carry planes by air from Hungary, a wheel axle was added under the floats, and a wheel on either side of each float. The bottom of the float was designed and used as a skid in the last stage. These design features meant that the aircraft could now take off from Gotha airfield for acceptance flights.
<...>
Five of these two seat Gotha WD-1 reconnaissance floatplanes, No.s 285 to 289, were built for the navy in mid-1914. Fitted with a 100hp Daimler D I, the WD-1 had a top level speed of 56mph at sea level. If this seems low, the climb to 3,200 feet took a tedious 24.5 minutes. However, the WD-1 did appear to have, for its day, a useful range of 335 miles. Seen here is the prototype WD, the 100 hp Gnome powered prototype, first flown in February 1914 and which never seems to have been given a naval serial number.
Gotha WD2 (1915/16)
Gotha WD2 for Turkey.
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In March 1915, Gothaer Waggonfabrik acquired the license of a giant fighter aircraft with 2 x 160 hp Mercedes engines and a high-mounted fuselage, “Friedel Ursinus” type. The company produced about 20 such G-planes in 1915, and at the same time completed the work in progress on B-planes with 120 hp Mercedes engines. Shortly thereafter, the company brought out its own design of a G-airplane, since the Ursinus design could not hold up in the long run due to its heavy armor with a high-mounted fuselage that raised the center of gravity excessively.
<...>
Gotha G.I (GUH) (1915)
Gotha G.I (Design Ursinus), 1915.
Gotha G.I with two counter-rotating Benz Bz.III and Reschke propellers, 2 kg bombs on the nose, and one 10 kg bomb under the lower wing.
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The heavy land biplane LD6 was three-strut with plywood fuselage and 150 hp Benz Bz.III engine. With this, also the construction of seaplanes began and the contact with the Imperial Navy, which had good successes with this biplane, mounted on floats.
<...>
  At the beginning of 1915, the question of armament and thus the combat value of the flying machine became increasingly important, as front-line flying led more and more to aerial combat. It was out of this need that the so-called C-machine was born. The pilot’s seat, which used to be behind the observer (especially on aircraft with rear-mounted propellers), was moved to the front, and the aircraft was equipped with a machine gun that could be moved in all directions, followed shortly thereafter by a fixed machine gun that could be operated by the pilot. The C-machines released by the company did not go into series production, as they had already been overtaken by the competition in terms of performance while the test machines were being completed.
<...>
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  WD3 was a double fuselage biplane, equipped with MG, bomb dropping device and radio equipment (F.T. system).
<...>
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  WD5 was a wartime fast seaplane with 160 hp Daimler engine intended for reconnaissance and bombing.
<...>
  The need for fighter seaplanes led to the design of the WD9 type with a 160 hp Daimler engine. Special modification regarding the bracing was necessary so that the MG could shoot forward through the wings past the propeller. The float frame formed the supporting body for the cells. The design of this type of aircraft for bombs and radios resulted in the WD13 type.
<...>
The Gotha WD5 in the Gotha factory pond. The compact, 2-bay design was for more speed; power was from a 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine.The insignia are on both top and bottom surfaces of the top wing.
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Shortly thereafter, the company brought out its own design of a G-airplane, since the Ursinus design could not hold up in the long run due to its heavy armor with a high-mounted fuselage that raised the center of gravity excessively.
  The development of aircraft engines also led to a considerable improvement in the performance of the G-planes. Gotha already installed 2 engines of 260 hp each and gave the planes an armament of 2 MG (one in front, one in the rear) and soon increased this armament to 3 pieces. The bomb load increased from 150 to 300 kg due to the improved design and towards the end of 1916 to 450 kg, bringing a further increase in armament to 4 MG. At the end of 1916, the Gothaer Waggonfabrik delivered 50 aircraft, a squadron specially designed for use against England (4 MG, 450 kg bomb load).
<...>
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  In accordance with the wishes of the Inspektion der Fliegertruppen, LVG decided in September 1916 to resume construction of large fighter aircraft. This led to the start of series production of Gotha G.IV large fighters in early 1917. Further efforts to build its own large fighter did not bring any significant success.
<...>
A factory photograph of Gotha G.IV 607/16 carrying six 50-kg PuW bombs beneath the fuselage. The far-forward carriage of the bombs under the nose illustrate the tail-heaviness of the basic design. The bombardier/forward gunner normally carried a number of 12.5 kg bombs in bomb racks inside his cockpit, which partially compensated for the center of gravity problems, at least until they were dropped.
"G hangar" of the LVG in Johannisthal.
"G hangar" of the LVG in Johannisthal.
Working on a Go G.IV(LVG).
Gotha G.IV(LVG) (1917)
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  WD7 and UWD represented the first large aircraft ordered by the Navy. Type UWD, also a biplane with fuselage arrangement between the upper wings. As a result of this design, the two 160 hp Daimler engines could be moved together almost to the point where the airscrew circuits touched.
<...>
Gotha WD4 (UWD), Ursinus-Wasser-DD (1916)
Cover of the magazine "Motor", issue Jan./Feb. 1918.
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  WD7 and UWD represented the first large aircraft ordered by the Navy. Type WD7 was a biplane with two 120 hp Daimler engines (thrust propeller arrangement) mounted on lower wings; armed with 1 MG.
<...>
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  At the instigation of the Reichs-Marine-Amt, a Type WD8 single-engine seaplane with a 260 hp Maybach engine was produced. It was similar to the Type WD7, but was equipped with a machine gun and bombing system.
<...>
Gotha G.V (1916/17)
Another view of a fully-loaded Gotha G.V. A number of 12.5 kg bombs were usually carried in the forward cockpit.
Using the standard racks for the P.u.W. bombs, the composition of bombload could easily be varied. Under the centre-section of this Gotha G V can be seen five 50kg and two 100kg bombs. Aircraft of this type seldom carried more than a maximum of 500kg bomb-load even on short-range operations. Care of the precious rubber tyres is shown by the use of small trestles under the undercarriage vees, with load-spreading boards to prevent the trestles sinking into the earthen floor of the hangar.
The Gotha G.Va prototype with the final configuration of the box tail used in production.
Gotha G.Vb (1917/18)
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The particular success of the G-planes led to the construction of torpedo planes at the instigation of the Navy Department. The types WD11 and WD14 were developed.
  WD11 was initially a biplane based on the proven WD8 type with 2 x 160 HP Daimler engines, mounted on the lower wings to the left and right of the fuselage. To accommodate the torpedoes, the fuselage was provided with a recess on its lower side.
<...>
Side view of the prototype WD11, Marine Number 679, on a beaching dolley.
The Whitehead G/125 torpedo being loaded on a Gotha WD.11, the most successful German torpedo bomber.
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The need for fighter seaplanes led to the design of the WD9 type with a 160 hp Daimler engine. Special modification regarding the bracing was necessary so that the MG could shoot forward through the wings past the propeller. The float frame formed the supporting body for the cells. The design of this type of aircraft for bombs and radios resulted in the WD13 type.
<...>
Gotha WD12 (1917)
Gotha WD9 (WD13 ???) (1916)
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The particular success of the G-planes led to the construction of torpedo planes at the instigation of the Navy Department. The types WD11 and WD14 were developed.
  Based on the experience with the type WD11, the WD14 was equipped with 2 x 200 hp Benz engines (train screw arrangement). Depending on the intended use, the internal equipment was made, namely whether the aircraft was to be used for torpedo shooting, bombing, sea mine laying, or for 11- to 12-hour sea surveillance.
<...>
Gotha WD14 (Marine No. 801).
The last Gotha developments before the end of the war: Gotha WD 27 on floats, left Bomber Go.X with undercarriage.
Automobil und Aviatik A.-G., Leipzig-Heiterblick (Av)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  About 30 large Go.VII(Av) aircraft were built under license from Gotha in 1918.
<...>
Gotha G VII (production)
The Aviatik, Type Go. G VII (1918)
Gotha G.VIII/GL.VIII (1918)
The massive WD22 would seem to deserve four 260 hp Mercedes D.IVa engines of the type used in the Gotha G.IV and G.V instead of the smaller, less powerful engines fitted. That less powerful engines were installed was likely a result of the Royal Navy's Distant Blockade that was strangling German access to resources.
The last Gotha developments before the end of the war: Gotha WD 27 on floats, left Bomber Go.X with undercarriage.
Automobil- und Aviatik AG, Subsidiary Bork i. Mark

  The Bork branch of Automobil- und Aviatik AG has a differentiated history, having evolved from the “Hans Grade Flieger-Werke”.

Hans-Grade-Werke, Bork i. Mark

  After Hans Grade completed an engineering course at the Grevenbroich machine factory near Cologne at the age of 20, he began his studies at the Technische Hochschule in Berlin-Charlottenburg, the same university where Otto Lilienthal had previously studied. Equipped with the internship experience, Grade developed engine construction while still a student. The work progressed so well that he soon received three patents for his engine development. An engine-powered bicycle followed. After graduation, Grade returned to Koslin and accepted a managerial position in a small Koslin engine workshop, which he took over as manager with the support of the sponsor Hentschel in 1904. To increase sales opportunities, Hentschel and Grade decided to move to Magdeburg.
  On September 23, 1905, Hans Grade signed a shareholders’ agreement for Grade-Motorwerke GmbH, was appointed to the board of directors and became managing director. This GmbH manufactured in particular motorcycle engines for the well-known company Burckhardtia.
  In 1907, Grade had just completed his compulsory military service as a one-year volunteer and began designing the first aircraft engine. At the same time, he manufactures the first parts for an airplane in a workshop of his engine factory. The award of the Lanzpreis der Lufte (Lance Prize of the Skies) spurred Grade on to accelerate work on his aircraft; after all, the winner received 40,000 marks.
<...>
Automobil- und Aviatik AG, Subsidiary Bork i. Mark

  The Bork branch of Automobil- und Aviatik AG has a differentiated history, having evolved from the “Hans Grade Flieger-Werke”.

Hans-Grade-Werke, Bork i. Mark

Aircraft Development:

  Hans Grade developed a new monoplane from the “Libelle”, the “Schwalbe” in the basic models A, B and C, which differed in their wingspans of 8, 8.5 and 12 meters. The C basic type was designed as a two-seater. Grade also offered a total of seven different engines. This large number of possible combinations was intended to help meet special customer requirements. The competition was huge at the time. Grade felt this during many competitions and display flights in which he participated. The speeds that could be achieved with the “Schwalbe” (swallow) were no longer sufficient, so Grade decided to develop a racing monoplane. Two new models were developed. Type D was a single-seater with a 30 or 45 hp four-cylinder engine. For the first time, this type had a partially aluminum-clad fuselage made of tubular steel, in which the pilot was accommodated. However, the attainable maximum speed increased only to 110-115 Km/h.
  Although further types were also built at the Grade works in 1913 and 1914, the expected success failed to materialize, not least because of the collapse of civilian sport aviation. In particular, the measures taken under the National Flight Donation led to a steady decline in sales.
  After the outbreak of the World War, the capacities of Grade Flieger-Werke were used to repair front-line aircraft. Therefor an independent aeronautical development in Bork did not existed after the beginning of WWI. Grade’s influence within his company was so weakened by the directive rights of the military construction supervisors that he decided to sell his factory in 1916. The date of the establishment of the above company is January 1, 1917, the date of the takeover of Hans-Grade Flieger-Werke by Aviatik. The company manufactured about 550 Albatros B.II aircraft under license and repaired 250 Aviatik C I, C II and C III and DFW C V aircraft in 1917.
Halberstadter Flugzeugwerke GmbH, Halberstadt (Halb)

Foundation:

  In December 1911, the “Halberstadter Flugplatzgesellschaft” was founded. This paved the way for the construction of an airfield. The city also had the foresight to lay a cable line. This made it possible to build an aircraft factory on the edge of the new airfield site.
  The fact that Halberstadt became an “aviation town” was mainly due to the efforts of Max Heckel, a mining councilor.
  It can be assumed that Heckel also thought about creating an aircraft factory or at least an aircraft workshop. He was very well acquainted with the owners of the Oschersleben-based company Behrens & Kuhne, which was already building novel and transportable aircraft tents and airship hangars in 1911. When Hermann Behrens demonstrated his products in Berlin, he was asked to add light aircraft for the German army headquarters to the company’s production program in addition to the production of tents. These were primarily Bristol monoplanes, which were considered the best machines at the time and had been successfully flown by British pilots at Doberitz, the heart of German “military aviation”. Behrens therefore contacted Bristolwerke (The British and Colonial Aeroplane Comp., Ltd.), which had only been founded in 1910. He succeeded in concluding an agreement that Bristol aircraft could also be built in Germany.
  This company was then founded on April 9, 1912 under the name “Deutsche Bristol-Werke GmbH”. After the demonstration of the first Bristol aircraft, the Army Administration commissioned four aircraft, but required that the HFW simultaneously train pilots for the German Army. Thus, the Bristolwerke were also among the flying schools financed by funds from the Nationalflugspende.
  In September 1914, the company was renamed Halberstadter Flugzeugwerke GmbH. The founders were H. Behrens, G. Behrens, T. Stockhausen and Eduard Schnebel. The “Halberstadter Militar-Fliegerschule GmbH” and Plant II in Klusstrasse, where mainly boat building was carried out, were affiliated as subsidiaries.


Aircraft Development:

  The first new development to leave the Halberstadt aircraft works in 1913 was the so-called “Halberstadt-Taube” with a 70 hp engine. The Bristol monoplane (also known as the “Bristol pig”), which had been built up to that point, turned out to be difficult to steer. The Halberstadt Taube, on the other hand, was more cumbersome, but was smoother in the air. In addition, it was more stable (due to the so-called “Rover fuselage”).
<...>
Postcard with different views on the Halberstadter Flugzeugwerke.
"Хальберштадт-Таубе"
Halberstadt-Bristol Taube III ready for flight. (Peter M. Grosz collection/STDB)
Halberstadt-Bristol experimental biplane (1913), designed by Rover, being manhandled by its ground crew. The "Wickelrumpf" fuselage technology was used.
Halberstadter Flugzeugwerke GmbH, Halberstadt (Halb)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The first in-house design launched by the company was a biplane with an 80 hp rotary engine under the designation Halb B.I, on which flights were made for the first time in 1914. This design was followed by the Halb B.II type with a stationary engine, on which engineer Voigt, employed as the company’s chief pilot, made his first flights, and the first with an aircraft with a stationary engine.
<...>
Halberstadt B.III
Хальберштадт D.II. Западный фронт, 1916 год
Halberstadt D.III (1916).
Halberstadt C.III (1917)
Halberstadter Flugzeugwerke GmbH, Halberstadt (Halb)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1917/1918 the company built the first light C-airplane, type Halb CL.II, as a light fighter two-seater. The advantages of this aircraft, besides great maneuverability and speed (168 km/h), were its climbing ability, for it climbed to 5,000 m in 37 minutes. This aircraft went into serial production in 1917 and 80 to 90 were produced per month, and as many as 100 in early 1918.
<...>
Light combat aircraft Halberstadt CL.II (C.15459/17) in the Berlin Aviation Collection (opening: June 20, 1936).
March 23,1918 - 1000th HFW aircraft: Halb CL.II.
Halberstadter Flugzeugwerke GmbH, Halberstadt (Halb)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The next type, the Halb C.V, must be mentioned as another major advance in C aircraft. This type of aircraft was equipped with a 200 hp Benz engine (supercharged), possessed particularly great maneuverability and extraordinarily increased climbing capabilities, which according to the results of the C-machine competition in Adlershof amounted to 5,000 m in 23 minutes. With this performance, the machine was superior even to the C machines with 260 hp supercharged Maybach engines. The horizontal speed was around 180 km/h.
<...>
Halberstadt C.IX (C.VIII ???) (1918)
Halberstadter Flugzeugwerke GmbH, Halberstadt (Halb)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  As a further development, the Halb CL.IV type was created. This aircraft was even more maneuverable than the CL.II and reached 5,000 m in 31 minutes during competitive flights at Adlershof. The speed in straight flight was stated at 175 km/h at the time.
<...>
Restored Halberstadt CL.IV of the commanding officer of Schlachtstaffel 21. This aircraft is in the National Museum of the USAF. The compact design of the Halberstadt CL.IV is evident.
Halberstadt CLS.I (1918)
Hannover CL.II (1917)
Representatives of HaWa and members of the military authorities celebrate the delivery of the 1000th Han CL.II aircraft.
Hannover CL.IIa(Rol)
Hannover CL.II(Rol) 622/18 bears a white individual numeral "2" on the forward fuselage and a dark painted nose. Note the auxiliary struts to the tailplane.
THE HOME OF THE "HANNOVERANERS." - A batch of Hannover biplanes in the grounds in front of the HAWA. (Hannoveranian coach works) offices. The building on the left is part of fhe erecting shop.
Hannover CL.III (1917)
HaWa airfield was used postwar for civilian purposes.
The robustness of German aircraft is clearly demonstrated by this Hannover CL.II. The fabric was partially torn off.
Hannover CL.II 9387/17 from the first production batch photographed with its relieved crew after returning with significant damage to the fabric of the lower right wing. Early Hannovers did suffer wing failures that led to the strengthening of the machine; however, this appears to have been caused by anti-aircraft fire.
Hannover Han C.III after a taxi accident with an Alb D.V.
Aircraft delivered for repair (including Han C.III).
Hannover C.IV (1918)
HaWa airfield was used postwar for civilian purposes.
Hannover CL.V (1918)
Hawa F6, disarmed CL.V introduced in 1919 as a passenger aircraft, still believing in a continuation of the German aircraft industry.
The Hannover Type 6 was an 'express transport' derived from the CL.V. It could carry two passengers in addition to the pilot. It could achieve 180 km/h. Aircraft D.84 broke the world's altitude record on 22 October 1919.
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In the Autumn of 1914, the new Brandenburg Type “FD” was ready for tests. A development of the Type “D”, the prototype was powered with the 100 hp Argus As.II. After testing, at least 8 other machines were constructed with similar power plants. These aircraft had no Military Number and were probably the property of Hansa-Brandenburg, being used by the Caspar Flying School at Fuhlsbuttel.
<...>
  In the Spring of 1915, the Type “LDD”was ordered in quantity by the Austro-Hungarian Air Service. Machines were required urgently, but production capacity at the Briest plant was fully utilized. An Albatros B.I production line at Phonix was therefore changed over to the Brandenburg type after about the 25th machine and the initial order filled by the Austrian plant.
<...>
Production line in Brandenburg (Briest).
Brandenburg LDD (Austro-Hungarian B.I) (1915)
Brandenburg FD (German B.I) (1914)
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Heinkel‘s first design for Brandenburg was completed in April. A two-seater reconnaissance biplane, it was powered with a Benz Bz.II engine of 110 hp. Designated type “D”, some 12 aircraft were eventually produced, four of which were supplied to Austro-Hungary in late 1914.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In mid-1914 an enlarged version of the Type ‘D’ was fitted with pontoons and designated Type “W”. The German Navy, after testing the prototype, ordered 24 machines powered with the Benz Bz.III of 150 hp. Subsequently, 2 further aircraft were built which were fitted with the Maybach Mb.III of 160 hp. and in early 1915, one experimental machine powered with the Argus As.II of 140 hp.
<...>
Brandenburg W (1914/15)
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The Type “DD” was a cleaned-up version of the earlier “LDD”. Fitted with a Mercedes D.III of 160 hp, the performance was so improved over the latter type that on September 21st, 1915, it set a world altitude record, with 4 passengers, of 4760 m. Three machine guns were fitted, one pivot-mounted and two fixed to fire over the wing.
<...>
  The C.I (Brand DD) was, without doubt, the most common Brandenburg type in the Austro-Hungarian Air Service. Between 1916 and 1918 about 834 were produced by UFAG. The Briest plant delivered another 85 machines, and Phonix built about 400.
<...>
Brandenburg DD (Austrian C.I) (1915/16)
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In the Autumn of 1915 Heinkel ‘s first flying boat made its debut. The aircraft was designated type “FB” and was powered by a Benz Bz.III of 150 hp.
<...>
Hansa-Brandenburg FB Flying boat #511.
The MN has been remarked in the usual size and style on the prototype FB seen here at the Gotha works.
The Brandenburg FB was Brandenburg's first flying boat, developed in 1916.
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Second marine aircraft type for 1915 was the Brandenburg “LW”, a float-equipped biplane powered with a Mercedes D.III of 160 hp.This was an experimental type which was fitted with a machine gun - one of the first installations of this weapon on a seaplane. The sole machine (Navy No; 571) was tested late in the Summer but no production was undertaken.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In early 1915 the Type “NW”, a coastal patrol seaplane, was produced at the Briest works. 32 machines were built there and a repeat order for 30 additional aircraft were subcontracted by Gothaer Waggonfabrik AG in early 1916.
<...>
Gotha WD6 (HaBra NW(Go)) (1916)
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Heinkel‘s next aircraft was a single seat flying boat and as a tribute to Castiglioni it was given the designation “CC”. 36 of these aircraft were supplied to the Navy, all with Benz Bz.III engines of 150 hp.
<...>
Front view of Brandenburg CC (1916/17).
The Brandenburg CC was a successful flying boat fighter, but German crews preferred floatplanes in the chill waters in which they operated and the CC did not long remain in German service. In the warmer waters of the Adriatic it was a great success operating with the Austro-Hungarian Navy. The CC used the star-struts of the KDW; this model mounts one machine gun. Power for the German CC was the 150 hp Benz Bz.III.
Brandenburg CC from the first production batch, probably #1144, displays its clean lines, it carries two guns, has an airfoil radiator, and a streamlined engine cowling with propeller spinner.
The Benz engine got its own cowling to reduce drag and prevent damage by salt water.
This picture shows an experimental flying boat from HBF. The crosswise wing struts indicate a predecessor of the CC.
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  UFAG were unable to build any D.I’s as they were fully occupied with the production of the Brandenburg C.I. The 48 aircraft of UFAG‘s order were therefore supplied by the Briest works. This was the last Brandenburg type supplied in quantity by the German firm, as hence forth the design teams headed by Kirsten & Gabriel of Phonix and Orovecz and Blodek of UFAG were unable to develop their own designs independently of the Briest Design Office.
<...>
Brandenburg KD (Austrian D.I). 50 aircraft were built at Brandenburg, 71 at Phonix.
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Brandenburg had much greater success with the floatplane version of the “GF”. This was designated Type “GW” and was the first torpedo-bomber in the German Navy. 21 machines were ordered in 1916 in both long and short nosed versions all being powered with two Mercedes D.III’s of 160 hp each.
  A more powerful version of the Type “GW” appeared in mid-1916. This aircraft, the Type “GDW” had a greater wingspan than its predecessor and more powerful engines (2 Benz Bz.IV’s of 200 hp. each). It was also tested with the Benz Bz.IVa’s of 220 hp but as no orders were placed by the Navy it remained the sole example.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The third 1916 type was the “KDD” with an Austro-Daimler engine of 160 hp. This was the two-seat reconnaissance version of the “KD” and like that type had the “Star-strut” arrangement for bracing the main surfaces. Two machines were built and sent to UFAG as samples, but no production was undertaken, as it was considered that the strut arrangement was too complex.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Just after mid 1916 Heinkel’s team of marine aircraft designers had their greatest success thus far when the Brandenburg Type “KDW” was ordered in quantity for the German Navy. 58 examples were constructed, utilizing the Benz Bz.III engine of 150 hp and 10 aircraft were delivered with the more powerful Maybach Mb.III of 160 hp. One further Maybach powered example with increased wingspan may also have been built.
<...>
The Brandenburg KDW was the last model where only letters were used as the model designation. The following seaplane designations started with a "W".
Brandenburg KDW in front of the H.B.F. hangar in Hamburg-Fuhlsbuttel.
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The second experimental type of 1916 was the Brandenburg “KF” which was also Heinkel‘s second pusher scout. Powered by a Benz Bz.Ill of 150 hp, the twin-truss tail booms of the “MLD” were replaced with enclosed booms approximating in size to an actual fuselage structure. No production was undertaken as the performance did not match the complexity of the design.
<...>
Brandenburg KF (1916)
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  After the parent factory had started deliveries of the “GW” Series in 1916, Heinkel's team produced a floatplane with the designation “KW”. This was a development of the “LW” and was powered with a Benz Bz.IV of 200 hp (some sources quote the Benz Bz.IVa of 220 hp). Three aircraft were supplied as training machines, numbered 588-590.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Following the “CC”’ all subsequent Brandenburg aircraft followed by a number. Thus, the next design was Type W.11, and this was a larger and more powerful version of the “KDW”. Three were ordered by the Navy, but as performance proved to be inferior the last machine may not have been built.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Late in the year a redesigned version of the Type W.18 was built for the Austro-Hungarian Navy. This machine was powered with the 350 hp Austro-Daimler engine Dm345 and was generally referred to as the Type “KG”. 60 aircraft were eventually delivered from Brandenburg, 60 from UFAG and 8 from Phonix. In early 1918 OEFFAG constructed three modified machines, and these were designated Class "T".
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The W.14, W.15, and W.17 were projects which never got beyond the layout phase. Type W.16 was a design for a small “Station Defense” aircraft powered by an Oberursel U.III rotary engine of 160 hp. Three machines were ordered, but it is believed that only two were built in late 1916.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The last 1916 type was the “K” a specimen of which was sent to UFAG as a sample for a proposed replacement series for the “LDD” (C.I.) still being built there. However, the improvement in performance was not sufficient to warrant production of the type and the project was abandoned.
<...>
Brandenburg K (Austrian C.II) (1916)
Brandenburg L 16 (1917)
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Although the Type W.12 was completed in December 1916, weather conditions prevented it being tested until the following month. This was the first Brandenburg type with a field of fire from the observers’ guns which gave effective protection against a rear attack. The German Navy was very satisfied with its performance, and it was ordered into production.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In early 1917 Heinkel designed a small single-seat flyingboat powered with a 200 hp Hiero engine. This aircraft was designated W.18 and the German Navy ordered 3 for trial purposes. However, only the prototype is believed to have been constructed, as the Navy was never very keen on flyingboats, preferring the more easily maintained floatplane.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Type W. 25 was similar to the earlier KDW, except that it reverted to normal interplane bracing instead of the “star-strut” design of that type. It originally had ailerons on the upper wing only, but at a later date both wings were so fitted. Power plant was a Benz Bz. Ill of 150 hp. It was re-engined later with a Maybach Mb. Ill of 160 hp.
<...>
The W.25 had the fixed upper vertical fin of the late-production KDW, but differed in having ailerons on all four wings, which also featured increased span and area. These changes likely improved its handling characteristics, but not enough for a production order.
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In mid-1917 the German Navy decided to equip a submarine with a small scouting plane, and for this purpose Brandenburg designed the Type W.20, which was powered with the 80 hp Oberursel rotary motor. Three examples were built, the first without interplane struts. Another Series was proposed with the 110 hp Le Rhone, but these were never built, as the class of submarine for which both series were intended never went into service.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  At the start of 1918 it was apparent that aircraft supplied to the German Navy in the future would be required to carry more payload at greater speed over longer distances; hence installed power would increase, either through increased output of engines or the use of multiple engine installations. It was also clear that more machines would be needed to carry out the increasing tasks which befell a Navy now turning more and more to a defensive strategy.
  Orders for aircraft had increased from small batches in 1914 to dozens in 1918, in spite of difficulties in the procurement of materials and components. This delayed deliveries to such an extent that many aircraft were short of vital parts as early as the spring of 1918. However, Hansa-Brandenburg managed to supply and deliver aircraft in fulfilment of their Navy contracts and at the same time produce experimental machines in the hope of receiving orders.
  Early in 1918 the Briest plant produced the W.26 which was a long-range patrol seaplane with a 260 hp. Mercedes D.IVa engine. Three were built, but no production followed, The W.27 was a development of the W.12 with a Benz Bz.IIIb of 190 hp. One was built, although two machines were ordered. The W.28 remained in the project stage.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  At the start of 1918 it was apparent that aircraft supplied to the German Navy in the future would be required to carry more payload at greater speed over longer distances; hence installed power would increase, either through increased output of engines or the use of multiple engine installations. It was also clear that more machines would be needed to carry out the increasing tasks which befell a Navy now turning more and more to a defensive strategy.
  Orders for aircraft had increased from small batches in 1914 to dozens in 1918, in spite of difficulties in the procurement of materials and components. This delayed deliveries to such an extent that many aircraft were short of vital parts as early as the spring of 1918. However, Hansa-Brandenburg managed to supply and deliver aircraft in fulfilment of their Navy contracts and at the same time produce experimental machines in the hope of receiving orders.
  Early in 1918 the Briest plant produced the W.26 which was a long-range patrol seaplane with a 260 hp. Mercedes D.IVa engine. Three were built, but no production followed, The W.27 was a development of the W.12 with a Benz Bz.IIIb of 190 hp. One was built, although two machines were ordered. The W.28 remained in the project stage.
<...>
  The Type W.32 appeared in early 1918 and was essentially a re-engined W.27. Five machines were ordered, but the latter two were cancelled in April so that the full production resources of the Brandenburg firm could be concentrated on the manufacture of the superior W.33.
<...>
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In March 1918, Heinkel’s successor to the W.12 was tested at the Brandenburg factory. The W.29 was a low-wing monoplane on pontoons powered by a Benz Bz.III of 150 hp and using many components of the former type for ease of production. The design was an immediate success and over 100 were ordered, although only 78 were delivered before the Armistice terminated production.
  Type No. “W.30” was allocated to a large flying boat design which showed the trend in development of German naval aircraft. This machine was to be powered by three Mercedes D.III engines each of 160 hp - the first time such an installation had been proposed. Serial Nos. 2301 and 2302 were reserved, but the project was cancelled in favour of a larger aircraft.
<...>
The prototype W.29 with its Marine Nummer 2204 applied photographed 4 April 1918, at Warnemunde.
"The Rest. II. S.F.A. Wilhelmshaven." Wings, fuselage, engine parts of W.29.
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The last Brandenburg machine which was produced in any quantity was the W.33 of mid-1918, a larger and more powerful development of the W.29. Twenty-six aircraft had been delivered by November, 23 powered by the Maybach Mb. IVb of 260 hp. and 3 fitted with the Maybach Mb.IVa of 245 hp. (Some sources state that these machines were, in fact, W.29’s; that the latter three machines were fitted initially with the 300 hp Basse und Selve BuS.V, and that these engines were later changed to 260 hp Maybachs in order to standardise the power plant. No information on these statements is available).
  The W.34 was a slightly larger version of the W.33 and was powered with the 300 hp Basse und Selve BuS.V engine. Six were ordered, but only one example was completed, five were awaiting installation of power plants at the Armistice. The W.34 was the last Brandenburg machine completed in Germany in 1918.
<...>
  Brandenburg Types W.36 and W.37 were projects and although the former never got beyond the layout stage, the latter was eventually built in 1921 as the Caspar S.l (or He.l).
Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke AG (Brand)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In the summer of 1918 Brandenburg submitted a design for a large flying-boat designated W.35 which was to be powered with two Basse und Selve engines of 300 hp each. These aircraft were to carry a crew of four and in addition to the normal cargo of bombs a Becker-Kanone was installed on a swivel mount in the front cockpit. It was hoped that these machines would be the answer to the large Curtiss and Felixstowe boats which were giving some trouble to their smaller and more lightly armed German opponents.
  Construction was commenced on the premises of the former Oertz Works, and two hulls were almost completed at the end of October 1918. However, after the Armistice no further work was done on these machines and the unfinished hulls were broken up.
<...>
This single-seater fighter was designed in 1918 by Hergt. The aircraft was tested under field conditions without success.
Junkers-Fokker-Werke, AG, Dessau (Junk and Jfa)

Foundation:

  Professor Hugo Junkers had been working on aerodynamics since 1908. His laboratory was located in Aachen at the time. In 1911, he built a wind tunnel in Aachen that resembled Mr. Eiffel’s.
  His numerous experiments led him to conclude that the airplane of the future would be made entirely of metal, with thick wings, no stalks or braces. In April 1915, he had another aerodynamic laboratory with tunnel built at his factory in Dessau, so that he could more easily continue his research and apply the results of his experiments.
  This factory was already engaged in metal processing (production of heating stoves, bathtubs, etc.). In September 1915, he had it start building the first German all-metal aircraft (J.1).
  The first official tests of this aircraft took place in January 1916. The Flugzeugmeisterei rated them as interesting. The Junkers factory then received its first government order and continued to produce various types of all-metal aircraft.
<...>


Aircraft Development:

  In May 1914, Professor Junkers, who at the time was primarily concerned with the design and construction of his opposed-piston engine, began preliminary work on the construction of a metal monoplane without bracing. Junkers recognized in the braceless cantilever wings a significant advance in the aerodynamic sense, because such a wing has a significantly lower air resistance. For these cantilever wings, metal was and is definitely preferable to wood because of its uniform strength properties, its weather resistance, its fire resistance and the construction method that is largely ensured with metal.
  Following the principles of Eiffel in Auteuil and Prof. Prandtl in Gottingen, Prof. Hugo Junkers created a wind tunnel facility to establish the scientific basis for his design. In May 1914, the first facility was commissioned in Aachen, followed by a second facility in Dessau in February 1916. After the positive laboratory results led to the conclusion that the wing required for the cantilever design with a relatively large airfoil height compared to the usual thin airfoils could be built not only without a noticeable deterioration in the lift-to-drag ratio but with more favorable stability characteristics, construction of test flights could begin. These first tests were carried out in 1915 at the Junkers company in Dessau. Iron was used as the building material and a steel tube construction was used for the wing interior. The wing surface (covering) was designed as a flexurally rigid beam and was thus part of the load-bearing wing structure. The fuselage structure was also made of steel tubes.
  In January 1916, the first experimental aircraft, the J1 (monoplane with 120 hp Mercedes D II engine) was demonstrated, followed by an order for 6 aircraft. The rapid development of the aircraft as a weapon on both sides of the front led to a permanent increase in the requirements for flight characteristics and performance. For example, Junkers was forced to make technical changes to the monoplane while the first small order was being processed, among other things to improve the climb performance of the relatively heavy aircraft.
<...>
Junkers J.1 (1915)
Junkers aircraft production (J.1).
Junkers J.2 (1915)
Junkers aircraft production (J.2).
Strength test on a Junkers J.2 prototype under supervision of Bauaufsicht.
From the Junkers experimental aircraft project J.3 only fuselage and wings were built.
Junkers J.3 (only fuselage has been built, not a complete aircraft) (1916)
Junkers-Fokker-Werke, AG, Dessau (Junk and Jfa)

Foundation:

<...>
  In the fall of 1917, Junkers merged with Fokker on government orders to increase the production of its factories.
  The “Junkers-Fokker-Flugzeugwerke” A. G., which was founded in this way, had new buildings constructed in Dessau. The new company set forth especially the construction of the metal airplanes.
  During the war, the Flugzeugmeisterei gave the “Junkers” factories the short name “Junk”, after the merger with Fokker: “Jfa”. Fokker near Schwerin had the abbreviation “Jfo”.


Aircraft Development:

<...>
  During this period (late 1916) Junkers received a trial order to build 3 experimental J-airplanes (armored biplanes for ground combat) with 200 hp Benz engines. Although the J4 (military J.I) aircraft, which underwent its flight tests at Doberitz in February 1917, had a mass of 2,000 kg, which was enormous by the standards of the time, it proved that the required climb times could also be achieved in metal construction. The first armored aircraft for the front were released in the summer of 1917 and had quite satisfactory results, so that series production could begin. Duralumin instead of steel was used for the first time in the J4/J.I. Due to the lower strength, reinforcing corrugated sheets made of duralumin were also used for the first time in the structural area of the J4. Incidentally, there was also a single J4 in which the entire fuselage, including paneling, was built from duralumin for test purposes.
<...>
  All in all, it can be said that the two partners, Fokker and Junkers, pursued too different approaches to aircraft construction, so that a fruitful collaboration did not materialize after the takeover. It was not until after the end of the First World War, when both entrepreneurs went their separate ways again, that decisive impetus was given to aircraft construction by both companies.


Story behind the fusion from Fokker and Junkers (taken from “The Hugo Junkers Homepage" by Horst Zoeller

  The initial Junkers aircraft J1 to J3 and the J4 prototypes were still produced within the Junkers & Co. workshops. Following the successful tests of the Junkers J4, Idflieg was interested in a serial production of this combat aircraft. However, Idflieg was not convinced with the Junkers facilities in Dessau, as Junkers did not have any experience in a large-scale serial production of aircraft. Nevertheless, an initial order for 50 Junkers J.4s was placed in February 1917. Difficulties with the material supply of the armour plates, which were provided by Huttenwerk Dillingen and change requests from the still ongoing test program at Adlershof resulted in the Idflieg expected delivery delays. The first aircraft 100/17 was delivered in August 1917 for front tests. At this time Junkers was still unable to put out the promised number of 30-50 aircraft per month. Therefore, Idflieg refused to put any further orders for the J4 until Junkers solved his production problems. Idflieg also promoted a merger with one of the larger experienced aircraft manufacturers in Germany. Due to the missing Idflieg orders Junkers got into financial problems and therefore started discussions with several potential partners, like Daimler, Stinnes, Siemens-Schuckert, Bosch, Aviatik, Oesterreichsiche Fiat, and Fokker as well.
  The experienced manufacturers were interested in picking up the J4 design for their own production lines and offered Junkers a minority shareholder position. But Hugo Junkers still intended to set up an own production line at his facilities at Dessau and was therefore looking for a partnership with knowledge transfer. Camillo Castiglioni of the Oesterreichische Fiat made a promising offer leaving Hugo Junkers with 70 percent of the shares. The joint venture company was intended to take a license agreement for the J4 from the Forschungsanstalt at Dessau and Fiat would be responsible for the setup of a serial production in the new company. However, these discussions did not come to a successful end.
  Anthony Fokker was another discussion partner. Instead of picking up the J4 for his own production lines, he offered the setup of a new facility at Dessau. As the Fiat offer, the Fokker offer was heading for a license agreement between the new company and the Forschungsanstalt. Junkers and Fokker should hold 50 percent of the company. On 20th October 1917 the Junkers-Fokker-Werke A.G. was founded at Dessau with a capital of 2.6 Mio. Mark. The Junkers capital was added with facility grounds, tools and materials.
  Following the foundation of the Junkers-Fokker-Werke Idflieg promptly put several orders for Junkers aircraft. With the engagement of Fokker at the Junkers facility and with additional staff from the Fokker-Werke at Schwerin the production rate at Dessau was raised from 17 J4 aircraft in January 1918 to 31 aircraft in October 1918. However, this was still less than the promised output rate of 50 aircraft per month. Initially the J.4s were shipped to Doberitz for flight tests, still in 1917 the flight tests were transferred to Wurzen near Leipzig. In May 1918 Junkers was able to offer test flights at a newly established airfield at Dessau as well. At least with the production setup of the Junkers J.9 new complexities arise.
  To increase the number of available J4 aircraft, in Summer 1918 Idflieg placed orders at other aircraft manufacturers for the J4 as well. In June 1918 a number of 100 J4 aircraft were ordered at Linke-Hofmann in Breslau. But as the license discussions between Linke-Hofmann and the Junkers did not make progress, this order was later cancelled. Another third-party order was put by Idflieg at Hansa-Brandenburg for a total of 50 Junkers J9 aircraft. Again, this third-party order was not realized. Therefore, all WWI Junkers aircraft were produced at Junkers & Co. or at Junkers-Fokker-Werke. At the end of WWI deep differences between Junkers and Fokker existed. During the time of Junkers-Fokker-Werke Fokker always tried to transfer technological knowhow from the Junkers-Fokker-Werke to his own facilities at Schwerin. Additionally, Fokker took opposite positions to Junkers’ designs as he liked to promote his own aircraft at Idflieg. On the other hand, Jco and Jfa were competitors regarding Idflieg orders, at least a number of pre series aircraft were built at Jco. Therefore, when WWI came to an end, both Hugo Junkers and Anthony Fokker quickly separated from each other, and the Junkers-Fokker-Werke were dissolved.
Junkers J.I (Junkers J.4) (1917)
Junker J.4 (J.I), J.140/17 ready for take-off.
Junkers J.4 (J.I) J.884/17 at airfield in Koln-Butzweilerhof (probably postwar).
Junkers J4 (military designation Junk J.I) shortly before completion (Dessau 1917).
The Junkers J.4 (J.I) had a special armored forward fuselage protecting the cockpits and engine.
Junkers-Fokker-Werke, AG, Dessau (Junk and Jfa)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In parallel development, the single-decker was converted into a D.I and CL.I aircraft, equipped with 185 hp BMW IIIa and 160 hp Mercedes D.IIIa engines, respectively. In September 1917, shortly before the merger with Fokker-Werke, the company produced a single-seat monoplane, followed by a two-seater in December. Comparison flights carried out at Adlershof in the spring of 1918 showed satisfactory results, but the aircraft was never put into larger-scale production. Development work on an R-airplane and a naval D-airplane was equally unsuccessful.
Demilitarized Junkers J.10 with cabin configuration for civil air transport, here flying between Dessau and Weimar, where the National Assembly of the Weimar Republic met in 1919.
Junkers-Fokker-Werke, AG, Dessau (Junk and Jfa)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In parallel development, the single-decker was converted into a D.I and CL.I aircraft, equipped with 185 hp BMW IIIa and 160 hp Mercedes D.IIIa engines, respectively. In September 1917, shortly before the merger with Fokker-Werke, the company produced a single-seat monoplane, followed by a two-seater in December. Comparison flights carried out at Adlershof in the spring of 1918 showed satisfactory results, but the aircraft was never put into larger-scale production. Development work on an R-airplane and a naval D-airplane was equally unsuccessful.
The ground-based image shows the same aircraft some 15 months later and looking almost indistinguishable from the prototype D I fighter, many of whose features had been evolved thanks to the J.7.
The J 7 with definitive wing proved faster than all other contenders in the first D-type contest.
Junkers J.7 (1917)
Loading Junkers J.9 (D.I) for the front line.
Junkers CLS.I (Junkers J.11) (1918)
View at the instrument panel and the two machine guns of a Junkers J.11 (CL.I)
Kaiserliche Werften

Foundation:

  The Imperial Shipyards in the German Empire were state-owned shipyards, alongside private shipyards, responsible for the design, construction, repair, modernization, and conversion of warships and submarines of the Imperial Navy in the period from 1871 to 1920. Some of their history began as Royal Shipyards for the Prussian Navy and, from July 7, 1867, for the Navy of the North German Confederation. In addition to the 3 shipyards in the German Empire:
  Kaiserliche Werft Danzig (1852-1920)
  Kaiserliche Werft Kiel (1867-1920)
  Kaiserliche Werft Wilhelmshaven (1853-1920)
  the Kaiserliche Werft Antwerpen in Hoboken (1914-1918) continued to exist at the time of WWl.
  The Ottoman Navy also had facilities in Istanbul, Izmit and Gemlik known as Tersane-i Amire (Turkish for Imperial Shipyards).
  Repairs were carried out at the Kaiserliche Werft, as well as the construction of licensed and own designs. In addition, a whole series of experiments were carried out in the interest of naval aviation. At Danzig-Putzig, Coulmann carried out experiments with central floats around 1912, using a converted Albatros fuselage biplane. Around 1917/18, the first catapult starts of a Hansa-Brandenburg from a military ship also took place here.
  Surprisingly, in addition to the already established aircraft companies, the Navy administration decided to develop and build aircraft on its own responsibility from the end of 1914. All 3 above-mentioned shipyards of the Kaiserliche Marine built a total of only 20 floatplanes, a number that seems insignificant when measured against the total number of all aircraft in service with the Navy.


Aircraft Development:

  Marine numbers 404 and 405 were the sole two examples of a unique seaplane design produced for the flying service of the Imperial German Navy during the First World War. By 1917, the output of the major German seaplane manufacturers was taken up producing machines for frontline service. As a consequence, the only machines available for training purposes were those that had been made obsolete or which had been damaged and rebuilt. In order to provide modern trainers for the Navy, the Kaiserliche Werft Danzig undertook the design and construction of two brand-new seaplanes between March and June, unarmed two-seat biplanes. These machines were supplied to the naval base at Putzig along with a batch of four trainers of a different design, numbered 467-470.
  Construction of these unarmed two-seat biplanes took place between October 1916 and March 1917, ahead of a separate order for two more machines of different design that had been assigned lower serial numbers by the Navy (404-405).
<...>



Kaiserliche Werft Wilhelmshaven

Foundation:

  Shortly after the commissioning of the war port in the middle of the 19th century, the construction of the third royal Prussian shipyard in Germany was started on the site in 1870, following the already existing royal Prussian shipyards in Danzig and Kiel. With the proclamation of the German Empire in January 1871, the navies of the North German Confederation and Prussia were in turn combined to form the Imperial Navy, and the former “ Konigliche Werften” (Royal Shipyards) were renamed “Kaiserliche Werften” (Imperial Shipyards) accordingly.
  In the meantime, a new town had grown up on the area around the naval facilities, which was given the name Wilhelmshaven in 1869 on the occasion of the inauguration of new harbor facilities by Wilhelm I.
  The company did not turn to aircraft construction until the end of 1914. For this purpose, vacant hangars on the shipyard’s waterside were used.


Aircraft Development:

  Imperial German Navy seaplanes numbers 401 to 403 were the only three examples of a unique seaplane design produced for the Navy’s flying service during the First World War. Production of these types commenced in April 1915 in an effort to supply the navy with a seaplane trainer of contemporary design. With the outbreak of war, the output of Germany’s major seaplane manufacturers was taken up with producing front-line types, and the only trainers available were obsolete or rebuilt machines withdrawn from their original duties. Number 401 and its two siblings were delivered to the Navy in August 1915.
<...>
Kaiserliche Werft Wilhelmshaven

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The KW Wilhelmshaven Marine Numbers 461 and 462 (Type 461, also known as W 10) were of the unarmed, two-seat floatplane (B-type) genus according to the Kaiserliche Marine’s aircraft group classification.
<...>



Kaiserliche Werft Kiel

Foundation:

  When the Kaiser Wilhelm Canal was finally completed in 1895, the Kaiserliche Werft Kiel moved to Kiel-Gaarden-Ost in 1899. Between 1899 and 1904, the area of the shipyard expanded to such an extent that the Germania shipyard in the south had to cede part of its site to the Kaiserliche Werft. The operation also continued to grow to the north, and in 1904 the last remnants of the old fishing village of Ellerbek disappeared with the expansion of the shipyard. To connect the two parts of the shipyard, the suspension ferry was completed in 1910 and soon became a landmark in Kiel.


Aircraft Development:

  Kaiserliche Werft Kiel received an order for four seaplanes in October 1915. The first aircraft of this batch (# 463) was delivered to the seaplane testing unit (SVK - Seeflugzeug-Versuchskommando) at Warnemunde near Rostock the following summer. It remained there under test for well over one year and was not finally accepted for service until summer 1918. This lengthy delay was possibly due to the aircraft being used as a trainer at Warnemunde itself.
  Marine number 463 was a conventional, two-bay biplane with unstaggered wings of equal span and two open cockpits for the pilot and instructor. The undercarriage consisted of twin pontoons. The large, square rudder was hinged to the rear end of the fuselage and extended below the ventral line of the fuselage.
KW Type 401 (461 ???) (Danzig) (1917)
Kaiserliche Werft #461
Kaiserliche Werft #462
KW Type 462 (Wilhelmshaven, Kiel) (1916)
Kaiserliche Werft Kiel Marine Nummer 463 (Type 462) with Benz engine.
Kaiserliche Werften

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Imperial German Navy seaplanes numbers 1105 and 1106 were the only examples of a unique design produced for the navy’s flying service (not for training purposes) during the First World War. They were unarmed biplanes of conventional configuration with staggered wings of unequal span. The empennage included a sizable ventral fin. Intended as training aircraft, the pilot and instructor sat in tandem, open cockpits. The undercarriage consisted of twin pontoons. The interplane strut arrangement was remarkable for its day, consisting of N-struts and V-struts without any rigging wires.
  These machines were supplied also to the naval base at Putzig at the end of 1917. After a short time at least the 1105 were returned to the manufacturer as “unserviceable”.
<...>
KW Type 1106 (Danzig) (1917)
The aircraft with the marine designations 1105 and 1106 were of the same design (type 1106).
Kaiserliche Werft Wilhelmshaven

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Marine number 945 (also called W9) was based on the Brandenburg W12, completed in the summer of 1918, but almost certainly never delivered to the Navy.
<...>
Kaiserliche Werften

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Number 1650 was an armed reconnaissance seaplane equipped with radio equipment capable of transmission and reception, therefore gaining the naval CHFT classification.



Kaiserliche Werft Wilhelmshaven

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Marine number 947 was handed over to the SVK in December 1917, but the aircraft was not accepted and returned to the shipyard.
<...>
Sea reconnaissance aircraft 947 with Daimler D.IV engine.
Kondor-Flugzeugwerke, Essen (Kon)

Foundation:

  Kondor-Flugzeugwerke, founded by the Lord Mayor of Dusseldorf, Wilhelm Marr, in Essen an der Ruhr on July 20, 1912, maintained its main plant on the site of the former Gelsenkirchen-Essen-Rotthausen airfield. The company also maintained a flying school there. A second flying school was opened in Nordhausen.


Aircraft Development:

  Although Suwelak, as the most experienced of the Kondor pilots, demonstrated the first pigeons designed by the company in flight, at first no orders were placed for the pigeons. The company endeavored to produce aircraft types through further improvements, which were not entirely without success in aircraft competitions and records, such as:
  1913:
   8-hour endurance record, Prinz Heinrich flight,
   Aeroplan tournament in Gotha, flight around Berlin,
   Krupp flight week, triangle flight;
  1915:
   Altitude record 4,000 m with 4 passengers (Lieutenant Hohndorf).
  Since the German army administration could not decide on the orders in the Kondor-Flugzeugwerke, the company first turned to the foreign market and exhibited its own design of an aircraft in Madrid on February 1,1914. This exhibition and demonstration was a complete success, as the Kondor-Flugzeugwerke received a trial order from the Spanish government for the delivery of a series of Kondor Taube G. This seemed to secure the further development of the company, but as a result of the outbreak of war, the delivery of the aircraft was prohibited by the army administration, as the aircraft were needed by Germany’s own aviation forces. Due to the difficulties associated with the outbreak of war, such as the mobilization of a large part of the personnel, including the technical director at the time, Mr. Josef Suwelack, the company itself ran into difficulties, although it was itself constantly seeking Army orders. By hiring new designers, 4 biplanes D.I, D.II, D.6 and D.7 were developed in succession.
  In 1915, due to good experience with this Spanish G export version, the factory received an Army order for several Type H “Kondors”with 100 hp Daimler D.I engines.
<...>
  Since the airfield in Essen-Gelsenkirchen-Rotthausen was unsuitable for effective training operations, the company transferred its flight school to the military airfield in Grossenhain/Saxony on April 20, 1915, and finally began training operations in Nordhausen on September 1,1917. The training aircraft, mainly Kondor Tauben and Kondor B.I, had the identifiers K1 to K23, but DFW, Albatros and LVG aircraft were also used for training. <...>
February 26, 1913: Suwelak's Kondor-Taube in Deventer near Zwolle. He attempted to fly to London. The bad weather conditions forced him to abort the flight.
Kondor Type A Taube on display. The Type A had an early 4-wheel landing gear. The engine was a 4-cylinder Benz. Identification of the various Kondor Taube is not certain and most of these identifications are tentative. The Kondor Type A was designed and built pre-war. (Peter M. Grosz collection, STDB)
Kondor Taube Type B. (1913)
Kondor Taube Type C (???) (1913)
Kondor Taube Type G. (1914)
Kondor-Werke 1913: Wooden wing production for Tauben.
Advertisement 1916.
Kondor-Flugzeugwerke, Essen (Kon)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1915/16, they began to design various school biplanes, which had angular fuselages as opposed to the round fuselages of the machines they had previously built.
  Of these, only the Kondor W.1 and Kondor W.2c types have so far become known in the picture. In 1915, the company has built Albatros biplanes under license, and for 1916 it had received an order from the Army Administration for 50 Albatros type B.II training aeroplanes.
<...>
Kondor-Flugzeugwerke, Essen (Kon)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1915, the company has built Albatros biplanes under license, and for 1916 it had received an order from the Army Administration for 50 Albatros type B.II training aeroplanes.
  First a triplane with a 160 hp Mercedes D.IIIa engine was built and then a two-seater unit training aircraft with a 120 hp Mercedes engine. However, the army administration continued to give preference to the Albatros aircraft.
<...>
Kondor B.I, 120 hp Mercedes D.II ("B.I" - internal company designation). (1917)
Kondor-Flugzeugwerke, Essen (Kon)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In the meantime, a subsidiary company had been established in Nordhausen/Harz, where the Kondor flight school was located, which was called “Kondor-Werk, Gesellschaft fur Holzbearbeitung mbH”. Another company division, “Kondor-Flugzeugwerke GmbH Abt. Sagewerk” in Lemgo/Lippe, was added in 1918 by taking over the Schnackenback sawmill, because good wood and its good processing were essential for aircraft construction. And a lot of it was needed.
  While previously only training aircraft had been built, the first fighter aircraft was built in 1918, the Kondor D.I. It was a normal braced biplane with a round plywood fuselage and V-stems. It was equipped with a 110 HP Oberursel UR.II engine and took part in the second comparison flight in June 1918 in Berlin-Adlershof.
  The Kondor D.II also took part in the same test flight. It was an improved version of the Kondor D.I. The engine remained the same. The V-struts were replaced by II-struts. An interesting feature of the Kondor D.II was that the ailerons were not only on the upper wing, but also on the lower wing.
<...>
Kondor-Flugzeugwerke, Essen (Kon)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The Kondor D.VI was a further development of the Kondor D.II. The engine was an Oberursel UR.III with 145 hp. The special and unusual feature of this aircraft was the separated upper wing to improve upward visibility. No doubt this was ideal for a biplane, but the turbulence at the separation points above the fuselage also brought aerodynamic disadvantages. Incidentally, the fuselage was not made of plywood, as was the case with its predecessors, but consisted of a tubular steel structure with fabric covering.
<...>
Kondor-Flugzeugwerke, Essen (Kon)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Another aircraft, the Kondor D.7, had a completely different appearance from its predecessor. With its torpedo shape, it strongly resembled the Albatros aircraft.
  It was a biplane with a carefully covered 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine. A striking feature was the narrow lower sweeping wing, which was braced by three struts that diverged from a point to the upper wing. The landing gear also had three shrouded struts on each side of the wheel. The Kondor D.VII crashed during testing at Adlershof in 1918.
<...>
  After the end of the war (until June 1,1020) furniture was also produced in the “Kondor-Werke”. On June 1,1920, due to bad business, the company stopped production.
Kondor E.IIIa (1918). Competing at the 3rd Fighter Competition in October, the Kondor E.III demonstrated higher wing strength and roll rate than the Fokker D.VIII. Unlike the Fokker, the Kondor's wing did not vibrate at high speed. The E.IIIa was faster and had a much better climb rate than the E.III due to its engine.
Kondor E.III: Tubular steel construction of the fuselage structure.
Wooden landing gear on the Kondor E.III.
Kondor E.III: 4-spar wing structure.
Kondor project P8 (1919)
Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Charlottenburg (Rol)

Foundation:

  Luftfahrzeug Gesellschaft mbH (LFG) is one of the oldest German plants established for the factory production of aircraft. It had its origins in Motorluftschiff-Studiengesellschaft mbH, which was founded in Bitterfeld in 1906. LFG was founded when Motorluftschiff-Studiengesellschaft merged with Parseval-Gesellschaft to build airships in 1908. The company headquarters moved from Bitterfeld to Berlin-Charlottenburg. The focus until then had been on the Parseval airships.
  A short time later, LFG took over the “inheritance” of the “Flugmaschinen Wright Gesellschaft”, which had gone into liquidation, and also began to manufacture aircraft, originally in Reinickendorf near Berlin on a site adjacent to the Luftschifferbataillon.
  Initially it built Wright-type aircraft under license, then in 1912 it launched the first LFG-branded aircraft, which soon became known as “Roland” aircraft.
  During the war, LFG was given the short name “Rol” by the Flugzeugmeisterei.
  The LFG comprised various business facilities:
   Plant in Charlottenburg (aircraft factory);
   Bitterfeld plant (factory for airships and seaplanes built in 1908);
   plant in Stralsund (factory for seaplanes);
   an old hangar in Reinickendorf near Berlin (see above).
  For the purpose of flying in the newly produced aircraft, a branch factory was established at the airfield in Berlin-Adlershof.
  The shareholders of Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft m.b.H, included a number of banks, Bank fur Handel und Industrie, Deutsche Bank and Nationalbank fur Deutschland, as well as companies such as Elektrochemische Werke Friedrich Krupp, Ludwig Loewe and Hugo Stinnes.


Aircraft Development:

  The LVG company was originally engaged in the construction of non-rigid airships, Parseval system, and in 1909 started building airplanes. In 1913, the Roland-Stahl-Pfeil biplane with a 100 hp Mercedes engine was built. The first aircraft of this biplane were made almost exclusively of metal, because the company wanted to undertake test flights in the colonies and wood was out of the question because of the climatic conditions. As early as the spring of 1913, a Roland steel biplane was taken to German Southwest Africa, which made numerous cross-country flights and excelled especially after the outbreak of the war until it was destroyed. During the war, it reverted to wooden construction due to the shortage of raw materials.
  The company bought the Wright Company, which had gone into liquidation as a result of patent disputes, and in further development and using the existing facilities began building modern aircraft in 1912, for which it introduced the trademark “Roland” as a symbol of power and reliability. With these self-designed machines, it achieved not insignificant successes in 1913 and 1914 and received an incentive for further lively activity from the Nationalflugspende, which was int ended to secure Germany a leading position in aviation.
  The first monoplanes and biplanes were made almost entirely of steel and were called “Roland-Stahl-Taube” and “Roland-Stahl-Doppeldecker” respectively.
  At the outbreak of war in 1914, the LFG initially saw its main task in training young pilots.
<...>
Roland-Steel-Arrow-Biplane, 1913, here stationed in German Southwest Africa.
Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Charlottenburg (Rol)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The first monoplanes and biplanes were made almost entirely of steel and were called “Roland-Stahl-Taube” and “Roland-Stahl-Doppeldecker” respectively.
<...>
Load trials.
1914: A monoplane of the Luft-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft (Air Traffic Company) (10 men).
1918: A braceless Fokker one-seater D VIII (24 men on carrying surface).
1922: A Junkers plane in the Research Department Dessau: 42 men on one wing.
Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Charlottenburg (Rol)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  Although Roland monoplanes and biplanes had already been delivered to the Army Administration, these types were not yet sufficiently war-tested to send them to the front. Therefore, on the advice of the Army Administration, LFG decided to build the proven Albatros aircraft under license. License construction then began rapidly at the beginning of 1915 under the type designation Alb B.II(Rol), equipped with 120 hp Mercedes engines. In further development, a reconnaissance aircraft without armament was built, and later a more powerful two-seater biplane Alb C.I(Rol), also an Albatros design, but with a rotating machine gun.
  As a result of extensive tests conducted by the Gottingen Experimental Institute, the company produced an aircraft under the designation “Roland-Walfisch”, which was characterized in particular by increased speed (by 30 km/h), improved field of fire and climbing ability. The Rol C.II “Whale” aircraft achieved an epoch-making reduction in propulsive drag. This Roland C.II biplane (Walfisch) began its test flights in October 1915. However, the first plane already had an accident, because forced to land quickly by engine failure, it rolled against a bollard and broke the wing.
<...>
  Above all, efforts were made to reduce the harmful frontal drag of the aircraft to a minimum. This problem could not be solved with the practical experience of the aircraft builders alone. It was now necessary to apply the findings of science, in particular those of the Gottingen Aviation Research Institute. The low-drag drop shapes developed here were to form the basis of future aircraft fuselage shapes. Thus, the Rol C.IIa “Whale” developed by LFG was the first to emerge, which allowed the top speed to shoot up by 30 km/h.
  At that time (1916), the emerging shortage of metals, especially steel, was already foreseeable. Skilled metal workers were tied up in other industries, such as the munitions industry. In contrast, carpenters and wood were freely available, which led to the “Whale” being made predominantly of wood. Even the stems, the basic framework of the hull, the frames, for which steel had also been used exclusively up to then, were now made of wood. This required a completely new strength determination for the entire aircraft. As a result, the Rol C.IIa was structurally better and lighter. External features, such as the propeller hub and ear cooler and the teardrop-shaped muffler, promised aerodynamic progress.
  Four weeks after the catastrophic fire at the Adlershof plant (September 6, 1916), the move to the hangars on Kaiserdamm (Charlottenburg) was completed. On October 9, 1916, the first aircraft left the factory there. Several hundred “Walfische”, now no longer built solely by LFG itself but under license from several major aircraft factories, reached the front. The German aircraft industry made the most imaginable efforts to catch up with LFG’s lead. The shape of the Rol C.IIa became the model for most of all subsequent aircraft designs.
<...>
A Roland C.II prototype rests in front of the L.F.G. factory at Adlershof. A similar photo was taken on October 24, 1915, and this photo was probably taken at the same time. An anemomenter airspeed indicator is mounted on the upper left wing for speed measurements. The aileron controls were led through the upper wing but early production aircraft ran the aileron controls through the lower wing. Although all production C.II aircraft used the 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine, at least two prototypes were tested with a 150 hp Benz Bz.III. The Walfisch design was patented by Ing. R. Richter on October 7,1915, and the Wickelrumpf technology was a closely-held industrial secret until 1918 when publicity photos of the Pfalz factory revealed some details of the process.
Roland C.IIa "Walfisch" (1916)
LVG C.IV with Daimler geared D.IV (8 cylinder in-line engine) and wooden propeller from Gebr. Niendorf GmbH; right: LFG Roland C.IIa Walfisch.
Oblt. Franz Hailer (center, hands on hips) with aircrew posing in front of an LVG C.IV at left (with late-production exhaust pipe) and Roland C.II at right. Hailer was the CO of FFA 9b (from 30 May 1915 to 21 June 1916), but this photo probably shows him as CO of FA(A) 292b in May 1917.
Two Rol D.I and C.IIa in the production hall in Charlottenburg (former airship hangar).
Rol C.II muffler, ear radiator, propeller spinner.
Fuselage structure of the Roland C.II "Whale", 1915/16.
The simple wood frame of the Roland C.II was covered by a streamlined, two-part Wickelrumpf shell.
Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Charlottenburg (Rol)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1916, the Roland biplane C.III with a 200 hp Benz engine was built, which was unfortunately destroyed by fire in the factory while still in the experimental stage. After this fire and the relocation to the newly leased factory premises on Kaiserdamm in Charlottenburg, a new design was created, a single-seater fighter called the “Haifisch” (Shark) under the type designation Rol D.II with a 160 hp Mercedes engine.
<...>
Clearly derived from the C.II, the Roland C.III had larger wings with conventional two-bay interplane bracing. Intended for the more powerful 200 hp Benz Bz.IV engine, it appears like a 160 hp Mercedes D.III is installed here, perhaps for initial flight testing. Armament was the standard fixed Spandau for the pilot and flexible Parabellum for the observer. The sole prototype was destroyed when LFG's Adlershof factory burned.
Two Rol D.I and C.IIa in the production hall in Charlottenburg (former airship hangar).
Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Charlottenburg (Rol)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1916, the Roland biplane C.III with a 200 hp Benz engine was built, which was unfortunately destroyed by fire in the factory while still in the experimental stage. After this fire and the relocation to the newly leased factory premises on Kaiserdamm in Charlottenburg, a new design was created, a single-seater fighter called the “Haifisch” (Shark) under the type designation Rol D.II with a 160 hp Mercedes engine.
<...>
  Development now proceeded at a rapid pace. The “Walisch” was followed by the Rol D.II “Haifisch” as a single-seater fighter. In February 1917, the 500th aircraft was delivered, and in October 1917 the 1000th. An aircraft left the Kaiserdamm plant every two hours.
<...>
Roland D.IIa "Haifisch" (1917)
L.F.G. Roland W (Alb C.Ia on floats) (1915)
The LFG Roland W16 photographed without floats in front of the LFG Bitterfeld seaplane production facility.
The Roland C.V was derived from the D.II fighter. It had the same 160 hp Mercedes D.III engine used in the D.II and larger wings with conventional single-bay interplane struts. Armament was the standard fixed Spandau for the pilot and flexible Parabellum for the observer. Only one Roland C.V was built.
A raised top wing and a conventional cabane distinguished the Roland D III from the earlier Roland fighter biplanes.
Although a triplane, this Roland fighter was designated the D.IV, not the Dr.I. This was the first Roland fighter to use the Klinkerrumpf fuselage construction, which was similar to constructing a wooden boat hull with overlapping boards. (160 h.p. Mercedes engine.)
Basically similar to the D XIII, the D XIV was powered by the unsatisfactory Goebel rotary.
Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Charlottenburg (Rol)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In February 1917, the company delivered its 500th aircraft and in October 1917, its 1,000th aircraft as the Roland biplane D.VI. By the end of the war, the production rate had risen to 10 aircraft per day.
<...>
This Rol D.VI was the 1000 LFG-aircraft.
Roland D.VI (1917)
The 2000th Roland aircraft was built in Charlottenburg: Roland D.VIb.
Roland D.XV prototype with BMW IIIa engine (1918)
The third Roland D.XV prototype was a completely new design that abandoned Roland's Klinkerrumpf fuselage construction in favor of a plywood fuselage. It retained the distinctive radiator design and location introduced on the previous Roland D.XV prototypes; other than the radiator it closely resembled the reigning Fokker D.VII.
LFG V19 single-seat low-wing monoplane from 1918 for use from submarines.
It was envisaged that the V19, packed in individual parts, could be carried in the submarine. The aircraft was to be assembled on the deck of the submarine. Far left: Engine with fairing as a separate individual part.
Components of the V19, packed in individual containers for submarine carriage.
Linke-Hofmann Werke AG, Breslau (now Wroclaw), (Li)

Foundation:

  The original company was founded in 1841 in Breslau by Gottfried Linke and became a joint stock company in 1871. Aircraft construction itself was not started until after the outbreak of World War 1 in 1916.


Aircraft Development:

  In 1916, Linke-Hofmann Werke were particularly involved in aircraft repairs. At the end of 1916, the company began building new aircraft under license. At the same time, Linke-Hofmann also developed its own designs, especially R-airplanes.The only type built and accepted was an R airplane designated Li R I.
<...>
Linke-Hofmann R.I (R40/16) (1917)
Linke-Hofmann R.I 40/16 fitted with faired interplane struts in front of a hangar in Breslau.
Linke-Hofmann Werke AG, Breslau (now Wroclaw), (Li)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  A second R airplane design, Li R.II, was undergoing flight tests at the end of the war. A total of 319 aircraft were manufactured in Linke-Hofmann factories.
Lufttorpedo-Gesellschaft (LTG), Berlin-Johannisthal (Torp)
  
Foundation:

  The Lufttorpedo-Gesellschaft Berlin, founded around 1916/17, worked mainly as a supplier for the aviation industry and generally produced wings, rudders, tension towers and tail units. The director of the Lufttorpedo-Gesellschaft, Max Schuler, contributed a patent for a sliding torpedo to the company when it was founded.
  The military abbreviation was Torp.


Aircraft Development:

  From the beginning, a design department was also established, which developed two types of aircraft during the war: an unspecified biplane with wheeled undercarriage, built only in small numbers (if at all), and the FD1 fighter on floats. On February 8,1917, the Navy Department placed an order with LTG for the construction of 6 of the latter, although the prototype was destroyed during the mandatory strength tests at SVK.
  The LTG received the order for the three prototypes (Marine numbers 1299-1301) of a floatplane fighter on 8 February 1917. The first airframe for static testing was delivered three months later and was destroyed during the process. The next aircraft was delivered in July; flight testing showed that it was not very maneuverable and lacked longitudinal stability, so the third prototype was returned to the factory on 7 September.
  LTG therefore revised the design and extended the keel and fin forward by about twice their length to improve stability in particular, whereupon the Navy ordered three more SD1s, which were assigned numbers 1518 to 1520. MN 1518 was delivered to the SVK on March 4,1918, and were accepted as early as the 8th of that month. The Imperial Navy ended up taking delivery of five of the aircraft, but did not use them. One was given a wheel landing gear on a trial basis. The sixth FD1 was used for static testing and was destroyed in the process.
  The LTG SD 1 was a single-seat sea-fighter aircraft which had as a special feature an upper wing directly connected to the fuselage. According to the Kaiserliche Marine’s aircraft group classification, it belonged to the type of single-seat floatplane with fixed MGs (ED).
  The two single-stage floats were 5.00 m long, 0.60 m wide and had a capacity of 948 l.
The LTG FD1 Marine Number 1518 was the first of three revised prototype floatplane fighters. The vertical tail surfaces were greatly enlarged to improve stability. By the time this aircraft appeared, the Brandenburg W.12 had proved the operational superiority of the two-seat floatplane fighter and the single-seat floatplane fighter was obsolete.
Torp SD1 Marine number 1518 with new fin design to improve stability and maneuverability.
Undocumented single-seater photographed in the LTG factory. This may have been a landplane development of the SD1 or a type developed in parallel. While the size of the vertical tail surfaces did not need to be as large as the floatplanes, it still looks too small for good stability.
Flugzeugwerft Lubeck-Travemunde GmbH, Travemunde

Foundation:

  In the course of the expansion of the Deutsche Flugzeugwerke (DFW) plant, they founded the Flugzeugwerft Lubeck-Travemunde in 1914 at the initiative of its director, Kommerzienrat Bernhard Meyer, together with the city of Lubeck and its financial support. The Flugzeugwerft Lubeck-Travemunde was entered in the commercial register on June 8, 1914.
  A 5-year contract between the finance directorate of the city of Lubeck and the “Flugzeugwerft Lubeck-Travemunde GmbH,” newly founded by the entrepreneur Bernhard Meyer of the Deutsche Flugzeugwerke Leipzig, initiated the start of aviation and the construction of an airport on the Priwall, a peninsula about three kilometers long at the mouth of the Trave River in eastern Schleswig-Holstein. This had been preceded by explorations to find a combined land and seaflight site on the Baltic Sea suitable for the German Reich. Priwall was given preference over Warnemunde for geographical reasons.
  In August 1917, after the death of Kommerzienrat Meyer, the aircraft company was taken over by Fokker. In late summer 1918, however, Karl Caspar was in negotiations with Anthony Fokker regarding the takeover of Flugzeugwerft Lubeck-Travemunde GmbH. The company, located in Travemunde on the Priwall, had originally belonged to the Deutsche Flugzeug-Industrie GmbH group in Leipzig (DFW), along with Deutsche Flugzeugwerke GmbH in Leipzig-Lindenthal and National-Flugzeugwerke Allgemeine Flug GmbH in Berlin-Johannisthal. Within this group, the Lubeck-Travemunde Flugzeugwerk specialized in the production of seaplanes. It thus became a branch of Hanseatische Flugzeugwerke Caspar AG Hamburg (HFC). The sole shareholder was Dr. Karl Caspar.


Aeronautical Development:

  The Deutsche Flugzeugwerke (DFW), which emerged from the Sachsische Flugzeugwerke in 1911, was first confronted with the problems of seaplanes in 1913 when it received an order from the Kaiserliche Marine to build a flying boat. The prototype, built according to the client’s specifications, was a biplane of wooden construction with a 100 hp Mercedes engine. Nothing is known about successful flights, but the company looked forward to new orders with confidence. In 1916, orders from the Navy followed, prompting DFW to establish a new aircraft plant with access to the water. This took place in Travemunde near Lubeck.
  In 1917, the first seaplane designed by Fritsch was introduced - the F.1. This aircraft was a DFW D.III equipped with floats. All three aircraft (Navy Nos. 282 - 284) were unique, because first the wings were staggered, on the next one they were unstaggered, and the latter was swept (similar to DFW’s Mars biplane). Only the Navy No. 282 was delivered, as there were delays in the first F.1 due to various improvement requests from the Navy.
  The F.2 (prototype: Marine No. 677), which had been ordered in 1916, even before delivery of the F.1, did not make its maiden flight until 1917. It was the first armed seaplane to be manufactured at Travemunde. The F.2 was also manufactured in various configurations. According to references, ten aircraft were delivered with the carrying deck raised for better pilot visibility from April 1917 to February 1918 (Marine Nos. 1147-1156). A second order for 9 aircraft was placed in October 1917 (Marine Nos. 1971-1979), with #1971-1973 being delivered as F.4s.
  The two-seater biplane with a wingspan of about 19 meters, based on the fuselage of the DFW B-types, was equipped with amphibious floats. The designer was Heinrich Oelerich. The powerplant was an eight-cylinder 220 hp (164 kW) Mercedes D.IV engine with transmission and a four- blade wooden propeller. The crew consisted of a pilot and an observer in tandem seating arrangement. The observer’s seat was equipped with a 7.92 mm Parabellum machine gun mounted on a swivel turret.
  Eleven F.2 aircraft were used by the Imperial Naval Forces of the German Empire. The aircraft were stationed at the Travemunde-Priwall seaplane base, which was also the location of the Imperial Navy’s flying school.
<...>
  The F.4 was the flagship of the Lubeck-Travemunde aircraft plant. In addition to the three aircraft already mentioned, a further 30 aircraft of this type with Marine Nos. 7001-7030 were delivered by November 1918. It is doubtful whether all aircraft were actually completed.
  One reason for stopping the production of the F.4 aircraft may have been that the new owner of the company, Karl Caspar, signed a license agreement with Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen (FF) for the construction of the FF.49C seaplanes, which were well established within the German Navy. Some of these aircraft were not completed and sold as civilian aircraft until after the end of the war.
Lubeck-Travemunde F.1 prototype.
Lubeck-Travemunde F.2 of first production batch.
Lubeck-Travemunde F.4.
Flugzeugwerft Lubeck-Travemunde GmbH, Travemunde

Aeronautical Development:

<...>
  The following F.3 was only built as a single unit. The only aircraft was not accepted by the SVK (Seeflugzeug-Versuchskommando) on March 23, 1918.
<...>
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH (LVG), Johannisthal & Koslin

Foundation:

  Luft-Verkehrs Gesellschaft mbH (LVG) was founded by Arthur Muller even before the war (1910) with the aim of carrying out advertising trips with Parseval airships Parseval PL.6 and P.L.9 “Charlotte”.
  When the company did not deliver the hoped for results after one year due to technical difficulties, the company started building Farman type airplanes under license.
  But the time of dependence on others was not to last long. At the end of 1911, the German army administration became interested in aircraft. They began to realize that an important weapon was in the making, even if they could not yet remotely foresee the extraordinary importance that the aviation industry would have in the not too distant future. Now the LVG saw a wide sphere of activity ahead of it and was determined to exploit the possibilities. The designer Franz Schneider was appointed, who had worked for a long time in the Nieuport factory in Reims and enjoyed the reputation of being a particularly reliable and skilled aircraft builder.
  During the war, the Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH had been given the abbreviated designation “Lvg”by the Flugzeugmeisterei. It owned:
   A factory in Johannisthal along with its own screw factory in Berlin.
   A factory in Koslin (Pomerania).



Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

Aircraft Development:

  Since 1910, the company was engaged in the exploitation of guided balloons designed at that time for passenger and light advertising trips. It bought some Parseval airships and made the first trips with them in 1910. The company was attracted by the growing interest in airplane construction and turned its attention to this field as well. As early as 1911, the company presented two self-built biplanes based on the Farman system and one original Farman biplane for the B.Z. flight. When the factory pilot and flight instructor Benno Konig won the first prize on an Albatros-Farman biplane built by LVG on the very last day, the company became known to the general public for the first time. The construction of further airplanes, improved by own constructions, but always after the Farman system, was taken up and civil pilots, whom the company had accepted as pupils, were trained on it in flying.
<...>
The D 3 airplane was a trainer built in 1912 with a 100 hp Argus or NAG engine. The nose was shrouded. The Prussian Army Administration ordered 18 aircraft of this type. A NAG engine was installed here.
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH (LVG), Johannisthal & Koslin

Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1912, the first monoplane was built, based on the Nieuport type. Although several were built, this aircraft was not accepted by the army administration. After the flop of the monoplane, the company turned to the construction of a biplane based on the Farman system and produced a design on the basis of which the Army Administration signed an order for 18 units.
<...>
  The monoplane type, equipped with an in-line engine, was taken back into the program on an experimental basis, but was soon put aside permanently, as the results achieved were unsatisfactory. With seven airplanes of two types, the company successfully participated in the Ostmarken-Flug, as each participating airplane received a prize.
<...>
  Returning to the monoplane, this machine was again rebuilt as such, but after Lieutenant Wentsch’s fatal crash it was finally discarded.
<...>



Franz Schneider Flugmaschinenwerke GmbH, Seegefeld/Spandau

Foundation:

  Franz Schneider acquired the factory facilities in Seegefeld from the liquidated Deutsche Eisenbahn-Speisewagen-Gesellschaft and founded his own company, Franz Schneider Flugmaschinenwerke.


Aircraft Development:

  In 1906, Schneider joined Edouard de Nieuport and his brother Charles as technical director of the Nieuport Duplex magneto factory in Suresnes near Paris. Infected by the Nieuport brothers' enthusiasm for aircraft construction, Schneider assisted them in 1909 with the design and construction of a monoplane "Nieuport N.1". In 1910, they built a closed monoplane, and the following year Schneider and the Nieuport brothers developed a monoplane for the Gordon Bennett race that flew at more than 100 km/h.
  After Nieuport's accidental death in September 1911, Schneider moved to Luft-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft A.G. in Johannisthal and began working as technical director, where, in addition to three different monoplanes, he designed the LVG B and LVG C biplanes, which were used in large numbers by the German air force.
<...>
LVG E 2 monoplane, Schneider system from 1912. This type was tested with different 80-100 hp engines: Gnome, Schwade, or Oerlikon.
Viktor Stoeffler (here in an LVG monoplane) was awarded by the National-Flugspende.
The E 4 was a racing monoplane with 80-100 hp Gnome, but also Oberursel rotary engine.
Advertisement 1915.
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  After the flop of the monoplane, the company turned to the construction of a biplane based on the Farman system and produced a design on the basis of which the Army Administration signed an order for 18 units. Supported by these successes, another biplane was built, namely a fuselage biplane B I (internally D IV), which made its first test flights in May 1913 with very good results. This type gave rise to the so-called Prinz Heinrich machine, which performed brilliantly for its time at the Prinz Heinrich flight and successfully took part in the competition, winning six prizes.
<...>
  In further development of the above-mentioned biplane, the aircraft with the internal designation D IV was created at the outbreak of war in August 1914, which was initially considered one of the best aircraft types at the front. Subsequently, and in particular to meet the wishes of the army administration and the front-line units, the type C.I, a combat machine with a movable machine gun for the rear-mounted observer’s seat, was created through redesigns and new constructions.
<...>
Advertisement 1915.
Luft-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft mbH, Koslin (now Koszalin, Poland) (LVG)

Foundation:

  The company, a subsidiary of Luft-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft mbH Berlin, was founded on September 1, 1915.


Aircraft Development:

  From the flight school established in Koslin in the spring of 1914, the branch factory was created due to the good local location of the airfield and favorable working conditions because of low labor costs.
  After completion of the building erected for fabrication, repair work on Lvg B.I and B.II aircraft was started, until an order for the production of Lvg B II front-line aircraft followed in January 1916. In April 1916, the company was awarded another order on 10 aircraft, Sablatnig type. As orders on front-line aircraft failed to materialize in September 1916, repairs were resumed in the workshops. In October 1916, LVG Koslin received a smaller order to supply seaplanes to the Reichs-Marine-Amt.
  In May 1917, the parent company, having expanded enormously, placed an order with the Koslin branch for the delivery of 200 Alb C.III(LVG) aircraft, which was subsequently increased to 300 aircraft (with a capacity of 40 aircraft per month).
LVG B.II (1914)
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
Subsequently, and in particular to meet the wishes of the army administration and the front-line units, the type C.I, a combat machine with a movable machine gun for the rear-mounted observer’s seat, was created through redesigns and new constructions.
<...>
  In February 1915, at the request of the Reichs-Marine-Amt, the company constructed a W.I experimental aircraft, a Lvg C.I with floats, for use as a torpedo plane. After completion in June of that year, the first flights were made and shortly thereafter the aircraft was acquired by the Navy as a training aircraft.
<...>
LVG C.I(Eul).
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  Progressive improvements in the Lvg C.I aircraft resulted in the company receiving large series orders on the resulting new type, Lvg C.II
<...>
LVG C.II (1916)
LVG C.I (C.II ???) (1915)
Franz Schneider Flugmaschinenwerke GmbH, Seegefeld/Spandau

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In 1913, Schneider patented a firing device for firearms on aircraft to the German Imperial Patent Office (D.R.P. No. 276396). This patent used a locking mechanism that, via a linkage coupled to the engine's crankshaft, locked the gun's trigger when a propeller blade was in front of the muzzle.
  In 1915, Schneider had this mechanism installed in the LVG E.I two-seat monoplane, whose observer seat he equipped with a second, movable machine gun on a special rotating ring mount, for which he also held a patent. Although the LVG E.I was lost during transport to the front for practical tests, the principle of Schneider's rotating-ring mount soon became standard in German military aircraft of the First World War.
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  Progressive improvements in the Lvg C.I aircraft resulted in the company receiving large series orders on the resulting new type, Lvg C.II, and in parallel also decided to build two large fighter aircraft, one with a fuselage and two tenders which served as engine foundations, and one with two fuselages in which the engines were installed, and a dinghy in the center to carry the occupants and armament. Since these aircraft did not meet the requirements set, construction of the large aircraft was abandoned. The same happened to a biplane with a wooden fuselage, which was put aside while still under construction because its fuselage was far too heavy.
<...>
The LVG G.I was designed as a Kampfflugzeug, and a single example was built in 1915. The arrangement enabled the gunner to fire in a 360° arc above the aircraft and gave a wide field of fire forward, but the standing gunner undoubtedly created a great deal of drag, limiting the aircraft's speed. The Kampfflugzeugs (battle planes) of all types soon proved failures as interceptors and air superiority aircraft because they were simply too slow and cumbersome to intercept and engage enemy aircraft. Operational experience soon demonstrated that bombing was the true role of these aircraft, and the early operational Kampfflugzeugs were the ancestors of German twin-engine bombers of WWI.
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  Further experiments in design and production led to the type Lvg C.IV (internally D XI), equipped with 220 hp 8-cylinder in-line engine Mercedes D.IV.
  This type, which after various modifications had become a success, was followed in mid-1916 by an order from the Army administration to build 125 aircraft, which were mass-produced.
<...>
LVG C.IV with Daimler geared D.IV (8 cylinder in-line engine) and wooden propeller from Gebr. Niendorf GmbH; right: LFG Roland C.IIa Walfisch.
Oblt. Franz Hailer (center, hands on hips) with aircrew posing in front of an LVG C.IV at left (with late-production exhaust pipe) and Roland C.II at right. Hailer was the CO of FFA 9b (from 30 May 1915 to 21 June 1916), but this photo probably shows him as CO of FA(A) 292b in May 1917.
The LVG D.10 with 120 hp Daimler D.II was an experimental aircraft with an extreme oval fuselage. Only one aircraft was built and tested in 1916.
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  The single-seat LVG aircraft, which was under construction in parallel, showed particularly good results in terms of top speed, which was still 206 km/h. Despite great expectations of this aircraft, they did not lead to the goal due to an unexpected wing failure.
<...>
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  A new training aircraft Lvg B.III was successful in 1918 and was built in larger series in the company’s own factory and also under license from other companies.
<...>
LVG B.III(Eul) with improved center of gravity compared to LVG B.III. (1918)
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  It was not until the fall of 1916, after Sabersky-Mussigbrodt had joined the company as designer and first technical director, that a new biplane LVG C.V (internally D XV) was built. This type was successfully accepted and went into serial production.
<...>
"C hangar" of the LVG in Johannisthal.
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  In accordance with the wishes of the Inspektion der Fliegertruppen, LVG decided in September 1916 to resume construction of large fighter aircraft. This led to the start of series production of Gotha G.IV large fighters in early 1917. Further efforts to build its own large fighter did not bring any significant success.
<...>
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  After these unsuccessful attempts, the company initially refrained from further in-house developments. LVG made successful efforts to obtain licenses from the Army Administration to build Albatros Alb D.II and DFW C.V aircraft.
  A machine with a 200 hp Benz Bz.IV engine designed during these license constructions, internally perceived as a Type D XIII, also led to no success.
<...>
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  At the suggestion of the Flugzeugmeisterei, the company decided to build a C-airplane LVG C.VI with a 200 hp Benz engine Bz.IIIa, which started its first test flights in mid-1918. In addition to this type, another C-airplane C.VIII with over-compressed Benz engine Bz.IIIau was constructed on the basis of the B.III training machine. However, this development was completed too late to be used.
<...>
LVG C.VI (1918)
Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin-Johannisthal, (LVG)

<...>
  At the suggestion of the Flugzeugmeisterei, the company decided to build a C-airplane LVG C.VI with a 200 hp Benz engine Bz.IIIa, which started its first test flights in mid-1918. In addition to this type, another C-airplane C.VIII with over-compressed Benz engine Bz.IIIau was constructed on the basis of the B.III training machine. However, this development was completed too late to be used.
<...>
The LVG D.VI used the ungainly fuselage and experimental Benz V-8 engine used in the earlier D.V coupled to an entirely new wing cellule. The D.VI was the final LVG single-seat fighter design built.
An L.V.G. Single-seater Scout produced towards the end of the War, presumably of the D.VI class (195 h.p. Benz Bz IIIb.).
Last of the LVG fighters, the D VI was not tested until the last week of World War I.
LVG W.II [LVG B.III on floats] (1918). Built at LVG Johannistal, not Koslin.
The LVG W.II serial 20/19 was another passenger-carrying floatplane derivative of the wartime C.VI. The W.II appeared to differ from the W.I in the type of engine installed.
Markische Flugzeugwerft GmbH, Golm i. Mark (Mark)

Foundation:

  The company was founded in Teltow on December 4, 1913 by Director Frank Eckelmann and Hans Coler. Initially, only test flights were carried out here. The construction of its own aircraft factory was not possible in Teltow. The Union Flugzeugwerke already located there prevented further expansion. In June 1914, the company’s headquarters were moved to Golm i. d. Mark. Golm is now a district of Potsdam. In 1920, the company was renamed Markische Industrie-Werke GmbH.


Aircraft Development:

  In addition to the licensed production of Ru C.I aircraft, the company was engaged in the finishing of two of its own single-seat fighters, originally designed by Wilhelm Hillmann of Schutte-Lanz.
  Work was carried out from 1918 on:
  D I - single-seat fighter with 195 hp Bz IIIbo. Interesting features were the drop tank under the pilot’s seat and wing warping on the lower wings for lateral control. One prototype was built.
  D II - since Idflieg declined the wing warping, Hillmann developed an improved variant with ailerons, but still retained the wing warping! The development was not completed until the end of the First World War.
Markische D.I (1918)
The sole Mark D I was destroyed before it could take part in evaluation at Adlershof.
AGO-Flugzeugwerke GmbH and Otto Flugzeugwerke
  
  After completing his studies in 1909, Gustav Otto initially founded three companies in Munich: “Bayerische Auto-Garage GmbH” (B.A.G.), the “Akademie fur Aviatik” and “Aeroplanbau Otto & Alberti/Gustav Otto Flugmaschinenwerke”, although it should be noted that Gustav Otto initially devoted himself to aviation technology purely out of sporting interest. In 1909/10, he took over the German representation of Bleriot and the biplane manufacturer “Aviatik GmbH” from Mulhouse (Alsace).
  The “Academy of Aviation” newly founded by Otto prompted him to move from Munich to Puchheim and, in the summer of 1910, to become the 34th German pilot to take his pilot’s certificate on an aviation flying machine with a 50 HP Argus engine. Otto then trained various pilots at his academy on the Puchheim airfield near Munich, including Ernst Udet (1896-1941) in 1914.
  His “Aeroplanbau Otto & Alberti” was initially set up in 1909 at Munich’s Oberwiesenfeld, at that time a drill ground which G. Otto was allowed to use as an airfield by agreement with the Bavarian military authorities. In 1910, both opened a branch of the company in Puchheim, the seat of his Academy of Aviation. Puchheim had a newly opened airfield and thus offered quite good conditions for the repair and manufacture of flying machines. 40 employees and technical staff were initially only responsible for the production of replicas of the Bleriot monoplanes. With 40 employees produced mainly replicas of the Bleriot monoplane. The first Bleriot replica, the “Otto No.1”was christened the “Sperber“ (Sparrowhawk).
<...>
Early Otto monoplane.
Otto monoplane (#1)
Advertising AGO type 3.
AGO-Flugzeugwerke GmbH and Otto Flugzeugwerke
  
<...>
  The Bleriot monoplane was followed by replicas by Henry Farman. Unlike the Bleriot, the Farman biplanes had a pusher propeller. The grid fuselages were not covered on the Bleriot or the Farman airplanes.
<...>
The number on the fin identifies the aeroplane as the Otto-Alberti No. 2.
Otto biplane (#3)
Otto-Flugmaschinenwerke on the Oberwiesenfeld near Munich (1911-1915). Hangar with an Otto mono- and biplane.
This photo of the Gustave Otto Flugmaschinewerke was scanned from Udet's book Mein Fliegerleben. In 1909, 13-year old Ernst Udet and some of his buddies (aged 10 to 13) formed what they called the "Aero-Club Munchen". Each Wednesday they met in the Udet attic to build flying models from scratch. When Gustav Otto, the son of Dr. Nicolas Otto, started building aircraft in his wooden sheds at Milbertshofen, the group of kids would organize outings to the Gustav Otto Flugmaschinenwerke. They would peer through the fence for hours... that is what you see in this photo. Later, of course, Udet would learn to fly there as well. The group of little boys peering through the fence no doubt includes Udet but which one is not known. (Greg VanWyngarden)
Gustav Otto biplane (1910/11).
AGO-Flugzeugwerke GmbH and Otto Flugzeugwerke
  
<...>
  As late as 1910, Otto had his own aircraft designed by Gabriel Letsch on the basis of the French prototypes. These first airplanes already had to meet important criteria that were expected of military airplanes, such as quick disassembly, fast assembly and good loading characteristics. The flight characteristics were relatively uncomplicated, so that these grid fuselage biplanes were gladly used in flight schools. The crew consisted of a passenger and the pilot, who sat directly in front of the engine. This was also an unfavorable aspect of the design: Since the Otto fuselage biplane was not yet equipped with a so-called shock landing gear, it could happen that the nose of the aircraft made contact with the ground in the event of an ungentle landing. In such a case, there was a risk that the pilot and passenger would be killed by the engine. However, there were large skids between the pairs of wheels of the landing gear, which were able to dampen forward pitching movements.
<...>
Advertising AGO type 2.
This photo of the Gustave Otto Flugmaschinewerke was scanned from Udet's book Mein Fliegerleben. In 1909, 13-year old Ernst Udet and some of his buddies (aged 10 to 13) formed what they called the "Aero-Club Munchen". Each Wednesday they met in the Udet attic to build flying models from scratch. When Gustav Otto, the son of Dr. Nicolas Otto, started building aircraft in his wooden sheds at Milbertshofen, the group of kids would organize outings to the Gustav Otto Flugmaschinenwerke. They would peer through the fence for hours... that is what you see in this photo. Later, of course, Udet would learn to fly there as well. The group of little boys peering through the fence no doubt includes Udet but which one is not known. (Greg VanWyngarden)
Otto Biplane #77 of 1913. So-called premium flights are advertised as part of the national flight donation tender (Nationalflugspende).
Ago-Flugzeugwerke in Johannisthal.
AGO-Flugzeugwerke GmbH and Otto Flugzeugwerke
  
<...>
  Shortly after the beginning of World War I, the production of airplanes was accelerated. In 1914 a new Otto biplane with a front-mounted engine was built, for which a 150 hp Rapp engine was intended. This machine was the first to reach a speed of over 150 km/h and was described in the English trade journal “Flight" as a “noteworthy front-line opponent”.
<...>
Otto-Werke, Development of own aeroengines (A.G.O. - Aeromotor Gustav Otto).
AGO-Flugzeugwerke GmbH and Otto Flugzeugwerke
  
<...>
  In 1915, the so-called “Doppelrumpf-Kampfflugzeug”with a 200 hp Rapp engine (Ot C.I), an armed twin-fuselage biplane developed by the Swiss designer August Haefeli, was also built. It was used as a reconnaissance plane and was extremely popular with pilots because of its very good flight characteristics.
<...>
Otto C.I 545/15.
Pega-Emich monoplane 1913.
Final assembly of Pfalz D.XII fighters with Daimler D.IIIa engines.
Etrich-Rumpler-Taube with Argus engine (1910).
From April 1, 1914, Alfred Friedrich was chief pilot at Rumpler-Flugzeugwerke in Berlin-Johannisthal. In June, he caused a sensation with his flights Berlin-Sofia, where he wanted to demonstrate German flying equipment, and Sofia-Bucharest, which was the first overflight of the Balkan Mountains with a passenger. Also noteworthy was his Berlin-Paris-London-Berlin round trip on September 6, 1913, in an Etrich-Rumpler-Taube. The photo shows Etrich as Friedrichs observer on his flight from Paris to London (the aircraft shown are not identical).
From April 1, 1914, Alfred Friedrich was chief pilot at Rumpler-Flugzeugwerke in Berlin-Johannisthal. In June, he caused a sensation with his flights Berlin-Sofia, where he wanted to demonstrate German flying equipment, and Sofia-Bucharest, which was the first overflight of the Balkan Mountains with a passenger. Also noteworthy was his Berlin-Paris-London-Berlin round trip on September 6, 1913, in an Etrich-Rumpler-Taube.
First Navy aircraft: Taube on floats. The Fritzsche monoplane took off from Sonderburg, on the island of Alsen, with First Lieutenant Low as pilot and Captain Lieutenant Busch as guest on its overseas flight to Kiel on June 18, 1911.
[Otto Fritzsche, Oberleutnant z. See, Kiel
Tandem monoplane 1908. Unable to fly. (In 1911 Rumpler rebuilt the plane to a Taube which became E1 in het German Navy).]
Germania Flugzeugwerke GmbH, Leipzig-Mockau

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In summary: The development of its own types of aircraft that were suitable for war failed.
  In 1915, the first order was placed by Idflieg for aircraft repairs and for the supply of spare parts. New aircraft for the Air Force were ordered for the first time in the autumn of 1917. Germania Flugzeugwerke received an order to supply 100 new Ru C.I. aircraft.
  In May 1917, the company received a further order for 100 Ru C.I aircraft, which was followed in October of the same year by another order for 100 aircraft.
<...>
Proud crew of a frontline aircraft.
Rumpler C.Ic(Germ)
Germania Flugzeugwerke. In front stands a Rumpler C.I(Germ) built under license.
Rumpler C.I(Bayru) 7051/18 was built as a trainer. Its late-style national insignia reflect the year 1918. Here is is undergoing acceptance flight testing at Adlershof in Autumn 1918.
Four aircraft Rumpler Ru C.I(Mark) shortly before being accepted by the local inspection authority Bauaufsicht #26.
Rumpler C.I(Mark) (1917)
Several Rumpler Ru C.I(Mark) in production. The large numbers show the internal serial number.
Unhappy landing at the flight school of Markische Flugzeugwerft.
Advertising poster 1916.
Germania Flugzeugwerke GmbH, Leipzig-Mockau

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  The aircraft repair shop had expanded in accordance with the requirements of the Army administration to such an extent that in the fall of 1917 a closed order was placed for 100 Ru C.IV type aircraft for repair.
  To eliminate the cooling problems of the 260 hp Maybach Mb.IVa engine, various cooling methods were tried: a) with so-called ear coolers next to the fuselage, b) cooling surfaces on the struts between the wings, or c) using surface coolers.
  At the beginning of 1918, at the instigation of the Idflieg, the production figures were initially reduced to 30 new aircraft per month, and later to 25. The number of repairs was also reduced (only up to 12 repairs per month), which meant that only half of the plant’s capacity was utilized.
Rumpler aircraft ready for shipment.
LVG-built Sablatnig SF2 (1916)
LVG-built Sablatnig SF5 (1917)
Advertisement Schulze-Herford monoplane 1910.
Schutte-Lanz Dr.I experimental triplane fighter (1918).
Sablatnigs world record flight with 5 passengers. October 14, 1913: He climbed up to 890 m.
Zeppelin D.I 1751/18 Ersatz (replacement).
The all-metal Zeppelin D.I, with its fully semi-monocoque construction, had the most sophisticated structure of any WWI aircraft. Designed by Claude Dornier, its structural technology is still being used.
Albatros-built Staaken R.VI(OAW) "Giant" of the 36-38/16 series on the Rfa field. (1917) (Peter M. Grosz collection/ STDB)
Albatros-built Staaken R.VI(OAW) 36-38/16 in the snow. (1917) (Peter M. Grosz collection/STDB)
Gothaer Waggonfabrik A.-G., Gotha (Go)

Aircraft Development:

<...>
  In January 1917, especially for the England flights, the type was substantially improved, since requirements were made for the flight duration of more than 6 hours. Towards the end of 1917, the essential demands made on payload and comfort of crew and aircrew, due to the night flights that had to be made to England because of antiaircraft defenses, led to a new design that would again allow daytime flying at altitudes of 6,000 to 7,000 meters. This goal was worked on until the end of the war.
  The construction of R-planes, which began in Gotha and was carried out in conjunction with Count Zeppelin, later led to the founding of a special company, Flugzeugwerft GmbH Staaken (see that chapter).
<...>
Orville Wright's biplane, on which he demonstrated the first round-trip flights performed in Germany in September 1909.
Wallin, for example, built the first man-carrying swing-wing glider.
Wallin's rotorcraft (???) (1906).